COVID-19 and ANCA-associated vasculitis - recommendations for vaccine preparedness and the use of rituximab

Analysis of T-cell and Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Rituximab-Treated Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Vaccinated with Combined Vector Vaccine Gam-COVID-Vac

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant changes in managing of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rituximab-treated patients were more susceptible to severe infection. This required a "switch" to another genetically engineered drug in the patients with high risk of adverse COVID-19. In this study, we assessed the severity of immune response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in rituximab-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis vaccinated with the combined vector vaccine Gam-COVID-Vac. Insufficient formation of the humoral response and a high level of T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in this group of patients were revealed. An imbalance of cellular and humoral response may play a role in more severe COVID-19 in rituximab-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

New-onset systemic vasculitis following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination: the trigger, phenotype, and outcome

The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic overwhelmed the capacity of healthcare systems to cope with the rapidly spreading infection and its associated complications. Among these complications, autoimmune phenomena such as systemic vasculitis emerged as a significant challenge. Both the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the vaccines developed to combat it appeared to induce clinical manifestations resembling various types of systemic vasculitis, affecting large, medium, and small vessels. These virus- or vaccine-induced vasculitides exhibited a distinct natural history and course from de novo vasculitis, as they were more responsive to steroid therapy and some mild cases even resolved spontaneously. Notably, there have been no confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination triggering variable vessel vasculitis like Behcet's disease or Kawasaki disease. IgA vasculitis, which is predominantly a pediatric condition, was more prevalent in adults after COVID-19 infection and they had a favorable outcome with glucocorticoid treatment. The impact of immunosuppression, especially B-cell-depleting agents, on the immunogenicity of the vaccine was evident, but there was no significant increase in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in these patients compared to the general population. Considering their relatively benign course, these post-COVID or post-vaccine vasculitides seem to be amenable to 0.8 to 1 mg/kg prednisolone or equivalent, which could be gradually tapered. The need for immunosuppression and the duration of steroid therapy should be determined on an individual basis. While the world still reels from the perils of a deadly pandemic, the aftermath continues to haunt. Our narrative review aims to explore the effects of COVID and the vaccine on systemic vasculitis, as well as the effect of disease and immunosuppression on the immunogenicity of the COVID vaccine.

Risks and treatment related aspects of COVID-19 infection in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis

OBJECTIVE

Patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) require immunosuppressive therapy for disease control and relapse prevention and may be at risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The study objective was to analyse risk factors and outcomes of COVID-19 in well-characterized AAV patients.

METHOD

Data were retrieved from March 2020 to May 2021 from medical records of AAV cohorts in Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden. COVID-19 was confirmed by positive PCR test or by ELISA. Severe COVID-19 was defined as need for non-invasive ventilation, intensive care unit care, and/or death. Age, gender, ANCA antibody type, ongoing immunosuppressive medication, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were recorded.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 310 AAV patients, of whom 29 (9%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Four deaths were attributed to COVID-19. Fifteen patients (52%) were on prednisolone in the COVID-19 group and 130 (46%) in the non-COVID group, with significantly higher doses in COVID-19 patients (p < 0.01). Ongoing induction therapy was more prevalent in the COVID-19 group (p < 0.01). Severe COVID-19 was diagnosed in 9/29 (31%). Significant risk factors for severe COVID-19 were impaired kidney function (p = 0.01) and more intense immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.02), with a trend for age (p = 0.07). Maintenance therapy with rituximab was not associated with severe COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight risks and suggest that more attention should be given to optimal AAV treatment in a pandemic situation. They also emphasize the need for continued shielding, mitigation strategies, and effective vaccination of AAV patients.

Immunosuppression and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may have an increased risk of mortality compared with the general population and hemodialysis patients. As these patients are immunosuppressed, it might seem obvious to attribute this excess mortality to the impaired immunity induced by immunosuppression. In line with this reasoning is the low immune response, both cellular and humoral, that KTRs mount in response to the anti–SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; however, acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus disease 2019 is triggered by a state of inflammation and cytokine release syndrome that lead to pulmonary damage and increased mortality. In that context, immunosuppressive treatment dampening the immune response could, in theory, be potentially beneficial.

This review aims at analyzing the current knowledge on the impact of immunosuppressive treatment on mortality in SARS-CoV-2–infected KTRs, the optimal management of immunosuppression in the coronavirus disease 2019 era, and the vaccine response and management in immunosuppressed KTRs.

Severe COVID pneumonia and undetectable B cells after vaccination in patients previously treated with rituximab: a case series

INTRODUCTION

The risk of developing severe COVID-19 illness despite completing vaccination for patients who have previously received immunosuppressive therapy is unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present three patients who received rituximab for treatment of autoimmune disorders who subsequently developed severe COVID-19 pneumonia post-vaccination requiring intensive care unit admission and found to have undetectable B cells.

DISCUSSION

While there have been concerns about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in this patient cohort, this is the first case series to report development of severe COVID-19 illness after completing vaccination in those who previously received rituximab. Guidelines for the optimal timing of COVID-19 vaccination in relation to immunosuppressive therapy have been recently published, albeit after many patients in this subpopulation have already been vaccinated.

CONCLUSION

This case series brings attention to the limited humoral response to vaccines in patients treated with rituximab, highlights existing guidelines and their limitations, and raises future considerations about the potential benefits to testing vaccine responsiveness.

The COVID-19 pandemic and ANCA-associated vasculitis - reports from the EUVAS meeting and EUVAS education forum

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic influenced the management of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. A paucity of data exists on outcome of patients with vasculitis following COVID-19, but mortality is higher than in the general population and comparable to patients undergoing haemodialysis or kidney transplant recipients (reported mortality rates of 20-25%). Delays in diagnosis have been reported, which are associated with sequelae such as dialysis-dependency. Management of ANCA-associated vasculitis has not changed with the aim to suppress disease activity and reduce burden of disease. The use of rituximab, an important and widely used agent, is associated with a more severe hospital course of COVID-19 and absence of antibodies following severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 infections, which prone patients to re-infection. Reports on vaccine antibody response are scarce at the moment, but preliminary findings point towards an impaired immune response, especially when patients receive rituximab as part of their treatment. Seropositivity was reported in less than 20% of patients when rituximab was administered within the prior six months, and the antibody response correlated with CD19⁺ B-cell repopulation. A delay in maintenance doses, if disease activity allows, has been suggested using a CD19⁺ B-cell guided strategy. Other immunosuppressive measures, which are used in ANCA-associated vasculitis, also impair humoral and cellular vaccine responses. Regular measurements of vaccine response or a healthcare-policy time-based strategy are indicated to provide additional doses ("booster") of COVID-19 vaccines. This review summarizes a recent educational forum and a recent virtual meeting of the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS) focusing on COVID-19.

COVID vaccination in patients under treatment with rituximab: A presentation of two cases from Iran and a review of the current knowledge with a specific focus on pemphigus

SARS‐COV2 vaccines were approved without long‐term monitoring due to emergent situations. This has raised some issues about the timing and protocol of receiving vaccines in specific situations such as patients receiving immunomodulatory agents including rituximab, which is widely used for various disorders such as multiple sclerosis, pemphigus, and many rheumatologic disorders. We described two cases of pemphigus vulgaris (a new case and one with flare‐up) following vaccination with Astrazeneca in Iran and reviewed the existing data in this regard through searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. All of the relevant papers published until June 28, 2021, which we could access their full‐texts were included. We found some recommendations made by rheumatologists, neurologists, and dermatologists in regard to vaccination timing in this group of patients and tried to summarize them to provide a practical guide for clinicians. Clinicians should perform a careful, individualized risk–benefit assessment for their patients and consider a delay in rituximab administration after completion of COVID vaccination if there is not any considerable risk of disease relapse or organ failure. Moreover, choosing vaccines with potential of providing protection after single dose, especially in countries with limited access to vaccines may be a reasonable approach.

De Novo and Relapsing Glomerulonephritis following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Microscopic Polyangiitis

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is the most important advance in the fight against the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Recent case reports show that the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines can very rarely cause de novo or relapsing glomerular disease. Here, we report two female patients with microscopic polyangiitis, who developed severe glomerulonephritis after immunisation with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. One patient with a possible ongoing but undiagnosed disease developed severe necrotising glomerulonephritis after the second vaccination. In the other patient with a long-lasting disease, rituximab maintenance therapy had been postponed because of the coronavirus pandemic. She noted macrohematuria immediately after the second vaccine dose and developed a severe renal relapse leading to end-stage kidney disease. We suggest that patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis be carefully monitored for disease activity immediately before and after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially if maintenance therapy has been interrupted. Ultimately, mRNA vaccines should probably be avoided in these patients.

Managing ANCA-associated vasculitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an online survey

Management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) during the COVID-19 pandemic poses unique therapeutic challenges. An online survey was conducted to understand physician’s choices for treating AAV during the COVID-19 pandemic. Web-based survey featuring nineteen questions was circulated amongst physicians across various specialties. The responses regarding immunosuppressive therapy for remission induction and maintenance, COVID-19 testing, and preventive measures were recorded. A total of 304 responses were recorded. Most of the respondents were from India (83.9%) and comprised rheumatologists (66%) in practice for ≥ 5 years (71%). Though a majority preferred Rituximab or intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) as a remission induction agent, a significant proportion opted for oral CYC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) also. Only one-third wanted to test for COVID-19 before initiating immunosuppressive therapy in patients with organ/life-threatening manifestations. Rituximab was the most favored maintenance therapy (47%), followed by azathioprine, MMF, and methotrexate. The results of this focused survey of managing AAV patients depict the real-world dilemmas and physicians’ choices in this setting.