To biopsy or not to biopsy a teenager with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome? Biopsy first

Kidney biopsy plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of several glomerular diseases. While it is generally considered a routine and safe procedure in children, it should be conducted with the primary objective of addressing the following question: do the prognosis and treatments vary based on the findings of kidney biopsy? In children presenting with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS), guidelines suggest to consider kidney biopsy for individuals older than 12 years, primarily due to the possible increased incidence of different glomerulonephritis compared to younger patients, who predominantly manifest with minimal change disease. However, these guidelines also advocate for uniform therapeutic strategies, typically steroids, irrespective of the age or histological findings. Whether the age of more than 12 years may be a recommendation for performing kidney biopsy at presentation of INS is debatable. Instead, kidney biopsy could be reserved for steroid-resistant cases. On the other hand, when kidney biopsy is performed in INS, particularly in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, histology may reveal additional lesions, that are strongly associated with a poorer response to treatment and worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, current guidelines on treatments of nephrotic syndrome may appear overly restrictive, despite the relevant findings provided by kidney biopsy. Therefore, in the present manuscript, which is part of a pro-con debate on the management of nephrotic syndrome in adolescents, we emphasize the potential role of performing a kidney biopsy before initiating corticosteroid treatment.

Nonlupus Full House Nephropathy: A Systematic Review

Key Points

Nonlupus full house nephropathy is a rare, complex entity: confusion arises by the low-quality evidence and the lack of consensus on nomenclature. This systematic review supports that systemic lupus erythematosus and nonlupus full house nephropathy are distinct clinical entities, with comparable outcomes. The identification of three pathogenetic categories provides further clues for a shared clinical and diagnostic approach to the disease.

Background

The presence of a full house pattern at immunofluorescence on kidney biopsy in a patient without clinical and laboratory features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has led to the descriptive term nonlupus full house nephropathy. This systematic review and meta-analysis focus on nonlupus full house nephropathy nomenclature, clinical findings, and outcomes.

Methods

In a reiterative process, all identified terms for nonlupus full house nephropathy and other medical subject headings terms were searched in PubMed. Out of 344 results, 57 records published between 1982 and 2022 were included in the analysis. Clinical data of single patients from different reports were collected. Patients were classified into three pathogenetic categories, which were compared according to baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes.

Results

Out of the 57 records, 61% were case reports. Nonlupus full house nephropathy was addressed with 17 different names. We identified 148 patients: 75 (51%) were men; median age 35 (23–58) years. Serum creatinine and proteinuria at onset were 1.4 (0.8–2.5) mg/dl and 5.7 (2.7–8.8) g/d. About half of patients achieved complete response. A causative agent was identified in 51 patients (44%), mainly infectious (41%). Secondary nonlupus full house nephropathy was mostly nonrelapsing with worse kidney function at onset compared with idiopathic disease (P = 0.001). Among the 57 patients (50%) with idiopathic nonlupus full house nephropathy, complete response was comparable between patients treated with immunosuppression and supportive therapy; however, proteinuria and creatinine at onset were higher in patients treated with immunosuppression (P = 0.09 and P = 0.07). The remaining 7 patients (6%) developed SLE after a median follow-up of 5.0 (1.9–9.0) years.

Conclusions

Our data support that SLE and nonlupus full house nephropathy are distinct clinical entities, with comparable outcomes. A small subset of patients develops SLE during follow-up. Nonlupus full house nephropathy is addressed by many different names in the literature. The identification of three pathogenetic categories provides further clues for the management of the disease.

Clinical significance of exostosin 1 in confirmed and suspected lupus membranous nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of exostosin 1 (EXT1) in confirmed and suspected lupus membranous nephropathy (LMN).

METHODS

EXT1 was detected in 67 renal tissues of M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R)-negative and ANA-positive membranous nephropathy by immunohistochemistry, and cases were divided into confirmed LMN and suspected LMN. The clinicopathological data were compared among the above groups, as well as EXT1-positive group and EXT1-negative group.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases (73.3%) of confirmed LMN and six cases (16.2%) of suspected LMN exhibited EXT1 expression on the glomerular basement membrane and/or mesangium area, showing a significant difference (p<0.001). Concurrently, lupus nephritis (LN) of pure class V demonstrated a lower frequency of EXT1 positivity compared with mixed class V LN in the confirmed LMN group (31.8% vs 68.2%, p=0.007). EXT1-positive patients in the confirmed and suspected LMN group showed significant differences in some clinicopathological data comparing with EXT1-negative patients (p<0.05). Follow-up data revealed that a greater proportion of patients in the EXT1-positive group achieved complete remission post-treatment (p<0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that EXT1 positivity was significantly correlated with complete remission across the entire study cohort (HR 5.647; 95% CI, 1.323 to 12.048; p=0.019). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the EXT1-positive group had a higher rate of accumulated nephrotic remission compared with the EXT1-negative group in the whole study cohort (p=0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The EXT1-positive group exhibited a higher active index and a more favourable renal outcome than the EXT1-negative group. It would be better to recognise suspected LMN with EXT1 positivity as a potential autoimmune disease and maintain close follow-up due to its similarities with confirmed LMN.

Recommendations for the use of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in the diagnosis and follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus - A proposal from an expert panel

Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies are listed as one of the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are relatively effective indicators for monitoring disease activity and treatment response. Therefore, clinicians rely on them to diagnose and adjust medication and treatment strategies for SLE patients. However, the use of anti-dsDNA antibodies is not free from controversy. Part of this controversy stems from the fact that anti-dsDNA antibodies are found in several disorders, besides SLE. In addition to this, anti-dsDNA antibodies are a heterogeneous group of antibodies, and their determination still lacks proper standardization. Moreover, anti-dsDNA testing specificity and diagnostic performance change depending on the population under study. These and other issues result in inconsistency and encumber the clinical use of anti-dsDNA antibodies. A panel of medical laboratory and clinical experts on SLE discussed such issues based on their clinical experience in a first meeting, establishing a series of recommendations. The proceedings of this first meeting, plus an exhaustive review of the literature, were used to compose a paper draft. The panel subsequently discussed and refined this draft in a second meeting, the result of which is this paper. This document is relevant to clinical laboratories as it guides to improving diagnosis and monitoring of SLE. Simultaneously, it will help laboratories compile more informative reports, not limited to a mere number. It is also relevant to clinical doctors who wish to better understand laboratory methods so that they can do a more efficient, better-aimed laboratory test ordering.

A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dilemma Concerning Exostosin 1/Exostosin 2-associated Lupus-like Membranous Nephropathy with Positive Antinuclear Antibody in an Elderly Man with Various Immune Abnormalities

Exostosin 1 (EXT1) and exostosin 2 (EXT2)-associated membranous nephropathy (MN) may be associated with active autoimmune disease. We encountered an elderly man who presented with EXT1/EXT2-associated lupus-like MN with full house immune deposits, monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and Sjögren's syndrome. The patient exhibited various other immune abnormalities. Although he did not fulfill the criteria of clinical systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), he met a stand-alone renal criterion of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012. Whether or not a stand-alone renal criterion with EXT1/EXT2 positivity, as in the present patient, can efficiently guide decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of SLE remains a clinical dilemma.

A possible role of classical complement pathway activation in the pathogenesis of immunoglobulin G nephropathy: a case report

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) nephropathy refers to a rare group of diseases characterized by deposits of IgG in the mesangial region. However, IgG nephropathy is controversial as a single disease entity, and its pathogenesis remains to be elucidated. In the present report, we discuss a case of IgG nephropathy in which we observed activation of the classical complement pathway.A 47-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with nephrotic syndrome. Light-microscopic examination revealed neither proliferative nor sclerotic lesions in the glomeruli. However, unusual and large deposits were observed in the paramesangial area. An immunofluorescence study revealed predominant IgG and C1q and slight C3 deposits in the paramesangial area, suggesting immune-complex-type glomerular disease. An electron microscopic study also revealed different sizes of non-organized electron-dense deposits with a similar pattern of distribution, which were accompanied by foot process effacement. Clinically, there was no evidence of systemic diseases, such as infectious or autoimmune diseases (including systemic lupus erythematosus). Based on these findings, she was diagnosed with IgG nephropathy and treated with prednisolone. Steroid therapy was effective, and complete remission was maintained.Additional immunological examination revealed that IgG deposits were polyclonal and consisted mainly of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses. Furthermore, staining was positive for C4d and C5b-9. The present findings indicate that the pathogenesis of IgG nephropathy in our patient may have involved activation of the classical complement pathway.

Seronegative Full-house Nephropathy with Crohn's Disease

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major risk factor for mortality in SLE, and glomerular "full-house" immunofluorescence staining is a well-known characteristic of LN. However, some cases of non-lupus glomerulonephritis can also present with a "full-house" immunofluorescence pattern. We recently encountered a patient with full-house nephropathy (FHN) during adalimumab administration for Crohn's disease. IgA nephropathy or idiopathic FHN was diagnosed, and treatment with steroids was started, after which there was improvement in proteinuria. The prognosis of FHN has been reported to be poor; therefore, aggressive treatment is required for such patients.

Bartonella endocarditis and diffuse crescentic proliferative glomerulonephritis with a full-house pattern of immune complex deposition

Background

Bartonella endocarditis is often a diagnostic challenge due to its variable clinical manifestations, especially when it is first presented with involvement of organs other than skin and lymph nodes, such as the kidney.

Case presentation

This was a 13-year-old girl presenting with fever, chest and abdominal pain, acute kidney injury, nephrotic-range proteinuria and low complement levels. Her kidney biopsy showed diffuse crescentic proliferative glomerulonephritis with a full-house pattern of immune complex deposition shown by immunofluorescence, which was initially considered consistent with systemic lupus erythematous-associated glomerulonephritis (lupus nephritis). After extensive workup, Bartonella endocarditis was diagnosed. Antibiotic treatment and valvular replacement surgery were undertaken with subsequent return of kidney function to normal range.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the importance of considering the full clinical picture when interpreting clinical, laboratory and biopsy findings, because the treatment strategy for infective endocarditis versus lupus nephritis is drastically different.

The spectrum of renal diseases with lupus-like features: a single-center study

Background

A subset of patients without overt systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) present with biopsy findings typically seen in lupus nephritis (LN). Although a minority eventually develops SLE, many do not. It remains unclear how to classify or treat these patients. Our study attempted to further understand the clinical and pathological characteristics of cases with lupus-like nephritis (LLN).

Methods

Among 2700 native kidney biopsies interpreted at University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) from 2010 to 2019, we identified 27 patients with biopsies showing lupus-like features (LL-fx) and 96 with LN. Of those with LL-fx, 17 were idiopathic LLN and 10 were associated with a secondary etiology (e.g., infection/drugs).

Results

At the time of biopsy, the LLN-group tended to be slightly older (44 vs. 35), male (58.8 vs. 17.7%, p = .041), and Caucasian (47.0 vs. 28.1%, p = .005). Chronic kidney disease was the most common biopsy indication in LLN (21.4 vs. 2.8%, p = .001). Both LN and LLN presented with nephrotic-range proteinuria (mean 5.73 vs. 4.40 g/d), and elevated serum creatinine (mean 1.66 vs. 1.47 mg/dL). Tubuloreticular inclusions (TRIs; p < .001) and fibrous crescents (p = .04) were more often seen in LN, while more tubulointerstitial scarring was seen in LLN (p = .011). At mean follow-up of 1684 d (range: 31–4323), none of the LLN patients developed ESRD. A subset of both LN and cases with LL-fx overlapped with other autoimmune diseases.

Conclusions

Lupus-like pathologic features are seen in a wide array of disease processes. The findings suggest that LLN may be a manifestation of an autoimmune process that overlaps with SLE.

De novo lupus-like glomerulonephritis after pediatric non-kidney organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

We propose a novel clinically significant finding, de novo lupus-like glomerulonephritis (DNLLGN), in patients with autoantibodies and kidney abnormalities in pediatric liver transplant (LT) and intestinal inclusive transplants (ITx).

METHODS

We describe the clinical, serologic, and histopathologic presentation and kidney outcomes in eight patients from our center found to have DNLLGN on kidney biopsy.

RESULTS

Pediatric recipients of non-kidney solid organ transplants developed an unusual de novo immune complex glomerulonephritis with morphologic similarity to lupus nephritis. Six had isolated LT (0.9% of all pediatric LT at our center) and two had ITx (2.1% of all ITx). Five (63%) presented with nephrotic syndrome. Five patients had autoantibodies. Patients underwent kidney biopsy at a mean of 11.5 years in LT and 2.8 years in ITx after the index transplant. Biopsies demonstrated changes similar to focal or diffuse active lupus. Follow-up eGFR at a mean of 6 years after biopsy showed a mean decrease of 30 ml/min/1.73 m² in all patients (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

DNLLGN has not been previously recognized in this clinical setting, yet 8 kidney biopsies from pediatric recipients of LT and ITx at our center in 25 years demonstrated this finding. DNLLGN appears to be an under-reported phenomenon of clinical significance. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Lupus-like nephritis with positive anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and negative antinuclear antibodies

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) are associated with small vessel vasculitis but their prevalence is not rare in other immune diseases. In lupus nephritis (LN), their pathological role and clinical relevance have been the target of controversial views.

We present a case of acute kidney injury and nephrotic syndrome in a young woman with diffuse global proliferative and membranous nephritis on her kidney biopsy, showing a full-house immunofluorescence pattern, very allusive of class IV + V LN, but lacking associated clinical criteria and laboratory findings to support the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Furthermore, the patient presented with high titers of ANCA, steadily decreasing alongside the renal function and proteinuria improvements, with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid treatment.

The authors believe this is a case of lupus-like nephritis, in which ANCAs are immunological markers, although they are not directly involved in the pathogenesis.

Anti-Nuclear Antibody-Negative Lupus Nephritis or Post-Infectious Glomerulonephritis: Diagnostic Dilemma in a Young Male

Proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is histologically characterized by endocapillary hypercellularity and large immune deposits on light microscopy. Immunofluorescence shows almost all immunoglobulins and complement staining. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is important for diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Absence of ANA rules out the possibility of SLE according to the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. We report a young boy with fever, nephrotic-nephritic syndrome and pancytopenia consistent with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Renal biopsy was consistent with LN; however, his initial ANA was negative. In view of pathological features of LN and persistent pancytopenia, high dose steroid therapy was started. Repeat ANA, done during the illness, turned positive. In this report, we describe the relevance of pathological patterns and the uncertainties of ANA positivity in making a diagnosis of SLE.

Lupus-like membranous nephropathy. Is it lupus? Report of 5 cases in a reference hospital in Mexico

INTRODUCTION

Lupus nephritis requires antinuclear antibodies as classification criteria. There is a group of patients with nephrotic syndrome and conclusive histopathological findings for lupus nephritis, without classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or extrarenal manifestations. These groups of patients have been described as "lupus-like" nephritis or "renal-limited lupus nephritis".

METHODS

Renal biopsy with histopathological evaluation with "full-house" immune-reactants in patients with negative antinuclear antibodies.

RESULTS

We report four cases with nephrotic syndrome and one with hematuria-proteinuria syndrome: two with impaired glomerular filtration rate and three with preserved renal function; urinary sediment with hematuria without dysmorphia and without extrarenal manifestations for autoimmune disease, negative antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA); normal C3 and C4 complement levels. Renal biopsy in all cases was consistent for lupus nephritis class V. All patients received treatment as lupus nephritis protocol; only one case received induction with cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone boluses, the rest received mycophenolic acid and prednisone as induction and maintenance. Two of the cases induced with mycophenolic acid relapsed, requiring cyclophosphamide for 6 months, achieving complete remission. All patients received renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and hydroxychloroquine. At follow-up, 4 cases still have negative antibodies and are without extrarenal manifestations for SLE classification criteria. The other case, during pregnancy several years after initial diagnosis, had preeclampsia with nephrotic proteinuria and a new determination of positive ANA and anti-dsDNA antibodies, complement levels below normal limits.

CONCLUSION

The follow-up of patients with membranous glomerulopathy must be close; lupus like nephritis may be the first manifestation of the disease.

Renal outcomes of idiopathic and atypical membranous nephropathy in adult Chinese patients: a single center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is mainly classified into idiopathic MN (iMN) and secondary MN in etiology. In recent years, a new kind of membranous nephropathy, atypical membranous nephropathy (aMN) which shows "full house" in immunofluorescence but without definite etiology was paid more attention. In a single center cohort, the renal outcomes of iMN and aMN were compared.

METHODS

iMN and aMN patients were selected from renal pathology databank from January 2006 to December 2015. Patients' demographics, laboratory values, induction regimens and patients' responses were recorded. Specially, creatinine, eGFR, albumin and 24 h urinary protein excretion were recorded at 6th month after the induction of immunosuppressive (IS) treatment and at the end of follow up. Complete proteinuria remission was defined as urinary protein < 0.3 g/d, partial proteinuria remission was defined as urinary protein between 0.3 g/d ~ 3.5 g/d and decreased > 50 % from the baseline. The primary outcome was worsening renal function, defined as a 30 % or more decrease in eGFR or end-stage renal disease (eGFR < 15ml/min/1.73m²). COX proportional hazard models were used to test if aMN was a risk factor of worsening renal function compared with iMN.

RESULTS

There were 298 patients diagnosed with MN and followed in our center for 1 year or more, including 145 iMN patients with an average follow-up time of 4.5 ± 2.6 years, and 153 aMN patients with 4.1 ± 2.0 years (p = 0.109). The average age of iMN patients was older than aMN patients (56.1 ± 12.2 versus 47.2 ± 16.2 years old, p < 0.001). There were 99 iMN patients and 105 aMN patients with nephrotic range proteinuria and without previous immunosuppressive treatment. 93 (93.9 %) and 95 (90.5 %) patients underwent immunosuppressive treatment in iMN and aMN group, and there was no significant difference of the overall proteinuria remission rates at 6th month (59.1 % vs. 52.0 %, p = 0.334) and endpoint (73.7 % vs. 69.5 %, p = 0.505) between the two groups. 25 (25.3 %) patients in iMN group and 21 (20.0 %) patients in aMN group reached primary endpoint (X² = 0.056, p = 0.812). Multivariate COX regression showed that after demographics, baseline laboratory values and remission status at 6th month were adjusted, aMN group had similar renal outcome compared with iMN group, the HR of primary outcome was 0.735 (95 % CI 0.360 ~ 1.503, p = 0.399).

CONCLUSIONS

The proteinuria remission rates and renal outcomes were similar in iMN and aMN patients after covariables were adjusted.

IgM on the surface of T cells: a novel biomarker of pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) frequently have kidney involvement. Lupus nephritis sometimes presents alone, without systemic SLE features, representing the so-called full-house nephropathy (FHN). Distinguishing patients with SLE or FHN has therapeutic and prognostic implications.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we determined the presence of IgM on the surface of T cells (T cell IgM) by flow cytometry and characterized its ability in distinguishing SLE and FHN patients in a large pediatric cohort (n = 84). Fifty-seven patients with SLE (≥ 4 SLICC criteria at disease onset or during the follow-up) and 27 patients with FHN (3 or less SLICC criteria) were enrolled.

RESULTS

Elevated T cell IgM levels were found in 24/25 SLE patients in active phase of disease and in 29/45 SLE patients in remission. In contrast, among FHN patients, only 1/9 presented this characteristic in active phase of disease and 0/20 in remission. Compared with standardized SLICC laboratory parameters, i.e., autoantibody titers and hypocomplementemia, T cell IgM positivity showed an extremely high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of SLE, with the highest area under the curve (0.97, p < 0.001) by receiver operating characteristic analysis, similar to ANA (0.96, p < 0.001) and anti-dsDNA (0.90, p < 0.001) autoantibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, our data indicate that T cell IgM intensity may be a useful tool to correctly classify patients with lupus nephritis as SLE or FHN since disease onset.

Systemic lupus erythematosus multiorgan flare with quiescent serologic markers

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can affect almost every organ with differing degrees of severity. Typically, SLE activity is associated with hypocomplimentaemia and elevated double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) levels. We describe a case of a severe multiorgan lupus flare including lupus cerebritis, autoimmune haemolytic anaemia, lupus nephritis and lupus myopericarditis with normal complement and dsDNA levels. This highlights the importance of understanding the heterogeneous nature of SLE flares.

Non-lupus full-house nephropathy: a case series

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic multisystem autoimmune inflammatory disease. However, some patients may exhibit a histological pattern of kidney injury, with characteristics indistinguishable from lupus nephritis, but without presenting any extrarenal symptoms or serologies suggestive of SLE. Such involvement has recently been called non-lupus full-house nephropathy. The objective is to report a series of clinical cases referred to the Laboratory of the Federal University of Maranhão that received the diagnosis of "full-house" nephropathy unrelated to lupus, upon immunofluorescence and to discuss its evolution and outcomes. Non-lupus full-house nephropathy represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, because it is a new entity, which still needs further studies and may be the initial manifestation of SLE, isolated manifestation of SLE or a new pathology unrelated to SLE.

Emicizumab-Induced Seronegative Full-House Lupus Nephritis in a Child

Hemophilia A (HA) is a serious inherited bleeding disorder resulting from a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Replacement therapy with intravenous infusion of FVIII can be associated with treatment failure in approximately one-third of patients secondary to the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitor). Emicizumab is a recombinant, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody that binds factor IXa and factor X and mimics FVIII. It has been licensed in many countries for the treatment of patients with HA with and without inhibitors with a favorable efficacy and safety profile. A 7-year-old child with severe HA and FVIII inhibitors, refractory to immune tolerance therapy, developed hematuria with nephrotic-range proteinuria after the first dose of emicizumab and subsequently also after a second dose 6 weeks later, which was associated with mild and transient leukopenia. Renal biopsy revealed a pattern of a full-house lupus nephritis. The patient fully and spontaneously recovered between 2 weeks after symptoms onset. In this report, we provide insights on a new and so far unreported renal complication associated to emicizumab treatment. Although emicizumab offers significant benefits for patient with HA, clinicians should be aware of this rare and potential serious renal adverse effect.

Non-lupus full house nephropathy in pediatrics: Case reports

Full house nephropathy is defined as the simultaneous detection of IgA, IgG, IgM, C3, and C1q deposits by immunofluorescence, usually indicating lupus nephritis. There are patients with this immunofluorescence pattern, but with negative autoantibody serology, which means they cannot be diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus. Patients presenting with full house nephropathy but no other criteria for lupus are diagnosed as having nonlupus full house nephropathy. Here, we describe two cases: A male patient who debuted with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and a female patient with nephrotic syndrome. Both had negative autoantibody serology, findings in the renal biopsy of class IV lupus nephritis and afull house immunofluorescence pattern. Histological findings in non-lupus full house nephropathy are similar to those in lupus nephritis and, probably, similar physiopathological bases. However, prospective studies are needed to determine risk factors and the renal prognosis and to make suggestions for specific treatments.

Stellenwert der Nierenbiopsie bei Lupusnephritis

Bei systemischem Lupus erythematodes (SLE) findet sich häufig eine renale Mitbeteiligung, der verschiedene pathogenetische Mechanismen zugrunde liegen. Die Nierenbeteiligung hat einen negativen Einfluss auf die Prognose des SLE, insbesondere bei progredienter Niereninsuffizienz. Eine Nierenbiopsie ist aufgrund der Heterogenität der Nierenbeteiligung und der damit verbundenen therapeutischen Konsequenzen unabdingbar. Sie kann durch nicht-invasive Untersuchungen wie die Urindiagnostik oder Serologie nicht ersetzt werden, da das Ausmaß der Proteinurie oder der Mikrohämaturie keine sicheren Rückschlüsse auf den Schweregrad, die Pathogenese und die Prognose der Nierenbeteiligung erlauben. Die Nierenbiopsie gibt neben der korrekten Klassifikation der Lupusnephritis (LN) Informationen über die Mitbeteiligung des Niereninterstitium, der intrarenalen Gefäße und der Aktivität sowie Chronizität der Nephritis. Auch kann der Pathologe die Frage beantworten, inwieweit mit einer Besserung der Nierenfunktion unter Therapie gerechnet werden kann. Der folgende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den Stellenwert der Nierenbiopsie bei SLE, der revidierten Klassifikation der LN von 2018 einschließlich Sonderformen der LN und über die Implikationen des Biopsie-Ergebnisses für die Therapie.

Update on the cellular and molecular aspects of lupus nephritis

Recent progress has highlighted the involvement of a variety of innate and adaptive immune cells in lupus nephritis. These include activated neutrophils producing extracellular chromatin traps that induce type I interferon production and endothelial injury, metabolically-rewired IL-17-producing T-cells causing tissue inflammation, follicular and extra-follicular helper T-cells promoting the maturation of autoantibody-producing B-cells that may also sustain the formation of germinal centers, and alternatively activated monocytes/macrophages participating in tissue repair and remodeling. The role of resident cells such as podocytes and tubular epithelial cells is increasingly recognized in regulating the local immune responses and determining the kidney function and integrity. These findings are corroborated by advanced, high-throughput genomic studies, which have revealed an unprecedented amount of data highlighting the molecular heterogeneity of immune and non-immune cells implicated in lupus kidney disease. Importantly, this research has led to the discovery of putative pathogenic pathways, enabling the rationale design of novel treatments.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Pathologic Findings to Diagnose Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In 2012, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics proposed that lupus nephritis, in the presence of positive ANA or anti-dsDNA antibody, is sufficient to diagnose SLE. However, this "stand-alone" kidney biopsy criterion is problematic because the ISN/RPS classification does not specifically define lupus nephritis. We investigated the combination of pathologic features with optimal sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lupus nephritis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Three hundred consecutive biopsies with lupus nephritis and 560 contemporaneous biopsies with nonlupus glomerulopathies were compared. Lupus nephritis was diagnosed if there was a clinical diagnosis of SLE and kidney biopsy revealed findings compatible with lupus nephritis. The control group consisted of consecutives biopsies showing diverse glomerulopathies from patients without SLE, including IgA nephropathy, membranous glomerulopathy, pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (excluding C3 GN), and infection-related glomerulonephritis. Sensitivity and specificity of individual pathologic features and combinations of features were computed.

RESULTS

Five characteristic features of lupus nephritis were identified: "full-house" staining by immunofluorescence, intense C1q staining, extraglomerular deposits, combined subendothelial and subepithelial deposits, and endothelial tubuloreticular inclusions, each with sensitivity ranging from 0.68 to 0.80 and specificity from 0.8 to 0.96. The presence of at least two, three, or four of the five criteria had a sensitivity of 0.92, 0.8, and 0.66 for the diagnosis of lupus nephritis, and a specificity of 0.89, 0.95, and 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, combinations of pathologic features can distinguish lupus nephritis from nonlupus glomerulopathies with high specificity and varying sensitivity. Even with stringent criteria, however, rare examples of nonlupus glomerulopathies may exhibit characteristic features of lupus nephritis.

Class IV Lupus Nephritis in the Setting of Serologically Quiescent Disease and Normal Urine Sediment in a Patient with Late-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that may affect any organ of the body. Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and serious complication of SLE. We report a case of an 80-year-old woman who was initially diagnosed with late-onset SLE and eventually developed LN in the setting of normal complements, double-stranded DNA, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and urine sediment. She developed abnormal renal function (creatinine of 1.7 mg/dl) and mild proteinuria (1-2+) without hematuria. Renal biopsy showed class IV lupus glomerulonephritis, active and chronic. The patient was started on mycophenolate mofetil which led to improvement of proteinuria and stabilization of creatinine. The suspicion for LN in a patient with late-onset SLE should remain high when there is development of suspicious renal or urinary abnormalities even if laboratory values do not suggest high disease activity and urinary sediment is normal. To our knowledge, this is one of the oldest patients with biopsy-proven LN and late-onset SLE.

Clinicopathological features of atypical membranous nephropathy with unknown etiology in adult Chinese patients

Membranous nephropathy is typically classified as idiopathic and secondary, but nowadays the number of atypical membranous nephropathy (aMN) is increasing, many of which cannot determine its etiology in China. In this study, we compared the clinical and pathological characteristics of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) with aMN with unknown etiology from a single center in China.We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 577 patients with iMN and aMN at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2006 to December 2015 over a 10-year period, and analyzed their clinical and pathological characteristics. The level of serum phospholipase A2 receptors (PLA2R) antibody was detected in 106 iMN and 162 aMN patients.There were 278 iMN patients and 299 aMN patients who were included into this study in 3210 cases of renal biopsy during a 10-year period in our hospital. The average age of patients with iMN was significantly older than those with aMN (54.77 ± 13.01 vs 47.13 ± 16.16, P < .001). Around 75 patients (27%) were smokers in iMN patients, and 111 patients (37.1%) in aMN patients (P = .009). The mainly clinical manifestation of these 2 groups was nephrotic syndrome (61.5% in iMN group vs 58.4% in aMN group), but there were more patients accompanied with nephritis syndrome in aMN group than iMN group (17.1% vs 6.1%, P < .001). The immunofluorescence of renal biopsy showed "full house" in aMN group; and IgG subclass of the glomeruli demonstrated IgG4 (90.4%) was commonest in iMN group, but IgG1 (94.6%) in aMN group. 51 (48.1%) patients with iMN were detected positive PLA2R antibody in their serum, and 93 (57.4%) in aMN patients (P = .168). The patients with positive PLA2R antibody had higher positive rate of microscopic hematuria and urinary protein, lower albumin.The aMN patients are younger, higher smoking rate, its main clinical manifestation is nephrotic syndrome, but more of them accompanied with nephritis syndrome than those in iMN patients. Serum PLA2R antibody could not distinguish aMN from iMN. aMN could be a special glomerular disease in China, and need a further research on a larger scale.

Outcome of childhood-onset full-house nephropathy

Background

Patients with full-house nephropathy (FHN) present renal lesions that are indistinguishable from those of lupus nephritis (LN) but lack the systemic features necessary to meet diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erithematosus (SLE). Some have been reported to develop a delayed SLE with time. The clinical outcome of children having FHN without SLE has never been reported.

Methods

Children with biopsy-proven FHN were selected after excluding SLE cases by the absence of America College of Rheumatology criteria. The proportion of patients with complete (proteinuria <0.5 g/day) or partial remission (proteinuria ≤50% from baseline), relapse (estimated glomerular filtration rate <25% and/or proteinuria ≥50% from baseline) and progression to Stage III chronic kidney disease (CKD) was described according to age and gender groups with the Kaplan-Meier curve and compared with the Log-rank test. Entity of treatment was summarized by a score at induction (0-6 months) and maintenance (6-18 months). Cox-regression model was performed to test predictors of remission, relapse and progression to CKD.

Results

Among 42 patients (28 pre-pubertal) who met the inclusion criteria, 39 (92.9%) achieved partial and 32 (76.2%) complete remission of nephropathy over 2.78 and 7.51 months of follow-up. At 10 years, the probability of progressing to CKD was 4.8%. Of those achieving remission, 18% had a renal flare mainly within 4 years after remission. Pre-pubertal males achieved complete remission more frequently than other patients but often relapsed; pre-pubertal females were treated more aggressively. Cox-regression analysis did not find independent predictors of remission or relapse.

Conclusions

The outcome of the patients with FHN we investigated was encouraging. Recurrences are limited to the first 4 years following diagnosis, allowing progressive withdrawal of immunosuppression in patients achieving remission. Evaluation of risk factors for adverse outcome is necessary especially in pre-pubertal children.

Proliferative lupus nephritis in the absence of overt systemic lupus erythematosus: A historical study of 12 adult patients

Severe lupus nephritis in the absence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare condition with an unclear clinical presentation and outcome.We conducted a historical observational study of 12 adult (age >18 years) patients with biopsy-proven severe lupus nephritis or lupus-like nephritis without SLE immunological markers at diagnosis or during follow-up. Excluded were patients with chronic infections with HIV or hepatitis B or C; patients with a bacterial infectious disease; and patients with pure membranous nephropathy. Electron microscopy was retrospectively performed when the material was available. End points were the proportion of patients with a complete response (urine protein to creatinine ratio <0.5 g/day and a normal or near-normal eGFR), partial response (≥50% reduction in proteinuria to subnephrotic levels and a normal or near-normal eGFR), or nonresponse at 12 months or later after the initiation of the treatment.The study included 12 patients (66% female) with a median age of 36.5 years. At diagnosis, median creatinine and proteinuria levels were 1.21 mg/dL (range 0.5-11.6) and 7.5 g/day (1.4-26.7), respectively. Six patients had nephrotic syndrome and acute kidney injury. Renal biopsy examinations revealed class III or class IV A/C lupus nephritis in all cases. Electron microscopy was performed on samples from 5 patients. The results showed mesangial and subendothelial dense deposits consistent with LN in 4 cases, and a retrospective diagnosis of pseudo-amyloid fibrillary glomerulonephritis was made in 1 patient.Patients received immunosuppressive therapy consisting of induction therapy followed by maintenance therapy, similar to treatment for severe lupus nephritis. Remission was recorded in 10 patients at 12 months after the initiation of treatment. One patient reached end-stage renal disease. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 2 patients relapsed.Lupus nephritis in the absence of overt SLE is a nosological entity requiring careful etiological investigation, including systematic electron microscopy examination of renal biopsies to rule out fibrillary glomerulonephritis. In this series, most patients presented with severe glomerulonephritis, which was highly similar to lupus nephritis at presentation and in terms of response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Renal-Limited "Lupus-Like" Nephritis: How Much of a Lupus?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by development of autoantibodies to nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens. A small subset of SLE patients who had the typical clinical features of SLE was reported to show persistently negative antinuclear antibody tests. Our report describes a 5-year-old male who presented with histopathological findings suggestive of lupus nephritis with no clinical signs or symptoms of SLE and negative autoantibodies. He was treated with corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide. During the 2-year follow-up period, the proteinuria resolved and kidney function improved with continued negative autoantibody workup. This case presents a category of renal-limited “lupus-like” glomerulonephritis which can be challenging to treat and carries a poor prognosis.

Mammary-type myofibroblastoma with the nephrotic syndrome

We describe a 23-year-old white man who presented with anasarca and a new periumbilical mass. He had preserved kidney function and laboratory findings consistent with nephrotic syndrome, including 9.7 g/day albuminuria. Serum serologies were positive for anti-SSa and anti-SSb and low complements but were negative for antinuclear antibody. Pathologic findings of the abdominal mass showed a mammary-type myofibroblastoma. A kidney biopsy revealed a diffuse proliferative and membranous immune-mediated glomerulonephritis with 10% interstitial fibrosis. This is a novel case of mammary-type myofibroblastoma associated with nephrotic syndrome mimicking a proliferative lupus pattern.

An Overlapping Case of Lupus Nephritis and IgG4-Related Kidney Disease

We report a case of a 71-year-old Filipino female who was admitted to the hospital for abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea of 8 days duration. The patient was found to have marked acute kidney injury (AKI), which required hemodialysis in the next 3 days. Extensive workup revealed hematuria, subnephrotic range proteinuria, elevated anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and elevated total immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, with normal IgG4 and anti-dsDNA levels. On kidney biopsy, mild membranous glomerulonephritis was found, along with autoimmune tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN) with a “full-house” pattern of immune deposits. These findings were suggestive of lupus interstitial nephritis. However, IgG4+ plasma cells were detected in the interstitium by immunostaining, favoring a diagnosis of IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD). Our case highlights the difficulty in differentiating lupus nephritis (LN) from IgG4-RKD in some patients, raising the suspicion that these two entities can co-exist.

An unusual initial presentation of lupus nephritis as a renal mass

Lupus nephritis is a frequent manifestation of systemic lupus erythematous. Lupus nephritis usually presents with abnormal urinalysis, proteinuria, and/or renal insufficiency. We report a case of a 48-year-old woman who underwent partial nephrectomy for a fortuitously discovered solid enhancing left kidney mass. No neoplastic cells were found in the biopsy specimen; however, the pathology findings were compatible with immune complex glomerulonephritis with a predominantly membranous distribution, a pattern suggestive of lupus nephritis. The mass effect was apparently due to a dense interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate resulting in a pseudotumor. Further investigation revealed microscopic hematuria with a normal kidney function and no significant proteinuria. Antinuclear antibodies were negative, although anti-DNA and anti-SSA/Rho antibodies were positive. A diagnosis of probable silent lupus nephritis was made and the patient was followed up without immunosuppressive treatment. After two years of follow-up, she did not progress to overt disease. To our knowledge, this represents the first case of lupus nephritis with an initial presentation as a renal mass.