Effect of a plasma sodium biofeedback system applied to HFR on the intradialytic cardiovascular stability. Results from a randomized controlled study

Uremic toxins removal and iron status: a medium-term comparison between 4 dialysis techniques (EMPIRE study)

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence documented that dialyzers and hemodialytic techniques yield different dialytic performances. The study aims to compare uremic toxins removal and iron status between on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD), expanded hemodialysis (HDx), and HFR Aequilibrium (HFR-Aeq).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 52 patients on chronic HD. Each study group (HFR-Aeq, HDx, HF-HD, and OL-HDF) included 13 patients. Naïve patients for each of the treatments were considered. Serum samples were collected at baseline and after 12-24-48 weeks from the enrollment. Intragroup comparison was performed using Friedman's test whereas longitudinal data were compared using linear mixed models (LMMs).

RESULTS

HDx showed a progressive improvement in the removal of urea (p = 0.043), λ -free light chains (p = 0.033), and transferrin saturation (p = 0.011) compared to other techniques. A nearly significant slope of β2 M was observed (p = 0.066). Also HFR-Aeq showed a near significant reduction in λ FLC values (p = 0.05) and a nearly significant increase in albumin levels (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

HFR-Aeq provides uremic toxins removal comparable to other traditional techniques (HF-HD, OL-HDF). HDx confirmed its superiority in the removal of uremic toxins as urea and λ FLC and surprisingly enhanced TSAT by a possible anti-inflammatory effect not ascertained in the present study. The utilization of non-optimal convective volumes likely vanishes the promising findings of OL-HDF.

Feedback control in hemodialysis

A number of systems of feedback control during dialysis have been developed, which have the shared characteristic of prospectively measuring physiological parameters and then automatically altering dialysis parameters in real time according to a pre-specified dialysis prescription. These include feedback systems aimed at reducing intradialytic hypotension based on relative blood volume monitoring linked to adjustments in ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity, and blood temperature monitoring linked to alterations in dialysate temperature. Feedback systems also exist that manipulate sodium balance during dialysis by assessing and adjusting dialysate conductivity. In this review article, we discuss the rationale for automated feedback systems during dialysis, describe how the different feedback systems work, and provide a review of the current evidence on their clinical effectiveness.

Changes in serum sodium concentration during hemodialysis is a predictor of mortality and cardio-cerebrovascular event

BACKGROUND

Previous study consistently showed that lower serum sodium (SNa) was associated with a greater risk of mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, few studies have focused on the change in SNa (ΔSNa = post-HD SNa - pre-HD SNa) during an HD session.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort of maintenance HD adults, all-cause mortality and cardio-cerebrovascular event (CCVE) were followed up for a medium of 82 months. Baseline pre-HD SNa and ΔSNa were collected; time-averaged pre-HD SNa and ΔSNa were computed as the mean values within 1-year, 2-year and 3-year intervals after enrollment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationships of pre-HD and ΔSNa with outcomes.

RESULTS

Time-averaged pre-HD SNa were associated with all-cause mortality (2-year pre-HD SNa: HR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.74-0.99], p = 0.042) and CCVE (3-year pre-HD SNa: HR [95% CI] 0.83 [0.72-0.96], p = 0.012) with full adjustment. Time-averaged ΔSNa also demonstrated an association with all-cause mortality (3-year ΔSNa: HR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.03-1.55], p = 0.026) as well as with CCVE (3-year ΔSNa: HR [95% CI] 1.51 [1.21-1.88], p = <0.001) when fully adjusted. Baseline pre-HD SNa and ΔSNa didn't exhibit association with both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower time-averaged pre-HD SNa and higher time-averaged ΔSNa were associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality and CCVE in HD patients.

Low dialysate sodium levels for chronic haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in dialysis patients and is strongly associated with fluid overload and hypertension. It is plausible that low dialysate sodium ion concentration [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension and ultimately reducing CV morbidity and death. This is an update of a review first published in 2019.

OBJECTIVES

This review evaluated the harms and benefits of using a low (< 138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 1 October 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (< 138 mM) versus neutral (138 to 140 mM) or high (> 140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model, and results expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 studies randomising 509 patients, with data available for 452 patients after dropouts. All but three studies evaluated a fixed concentration of low dialysate [Na+], with one using profiled dialysate [Na+] and two using individualised dialysate [Na+]. Five were parallel group studies, and 12 were cross-over studies. Of the latter, only six used a washout between intervention and control periods. Most studies were short-term with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4 (4 to 16) weeks. Two were of a single HD session and two of a single week's HD. Seven studies were conducted prior to 2000, and six reported the use of obsolete HD practices. Other than for indirectness arising from older studies, risks of bias in the included studies were generally low. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+] (≥ 138 mM), low dialysate [Na+] (< 138 mM) reduces interdialytic weight gain (14 studies, 515 participants: MD -0.36 kg, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.22; high certainty evidence) and antihypertensive medication use (5 studies, 241 participants: SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.1; high certainty evidence), and probably reduces left ventricular mass index (2 studies, 143 participants: MD -7.65 g/m2, 95% CI -14.48 to -0.83; moderate certainty evidence), predialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) (5 studies, 232 participants: MD -3.39 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.17 to -1.61; moderate certainty evidence), postdialysis MAP (5 studies, 226 participants: MD -3.17 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.68 to 1.67; moderate certainty evidence), predialysis serum [Na+] (11 studies, 435 participants: MD -1.26 mM, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.72; moderate certainty evidence) and postdialysis serum [Na+] (6 studies, 188 participants: MD -3.09 mM, 95% CI -4.29 to -1.88; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] probably increases intradialytic hypotension events (13 studies, 15,764 HD sessions: RR 1.58, 95% 1.25 to 2.01; moderate certainty evidence) and intradialytic cramps (10 studies, 14,559 HD sessions: RR 1.84, 95% 1.29 to 2.64; moderate certainty evidence). Effect size for important outcomes were generally greater with low dialysate [Na+] compared to high compared with neutral dialysate [Na+], although formal hypothesis testing identifies that the difference was only certain for postdialysis serum [Na+]. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], it is uncertain whether low dialysate [Na+] affects intradialytic or interdialytic MAP, and dietary salt intake. It is also uncertain whether low dialysate [Na+] changed extracellular fluid status, venous tone, arterial vascular resistance, left ventricular volumes, or fatigue. Studies did not examine CV or all-cause death, CV events, or hospitalisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low dialysate [Na+] reduces intradialytic weight gain and probably blood pressure, which are effects directionally associated with improved outcomes. However, the intervention probably increases intradialytic hypotension and probably reduces serum [Na+], effects that are associated with an increased risk of death. The effect of the intervention on overall patient health and well-being is unknown. Further evidence is needed in the form of longer-term studies in contemporary settings, evaluating end-organ effects in small-scale mechanistic studies using optimal methods, and clinical outcomes in large-scale multicentre RCTs.

Technical requirements and devices available for long-term hemodialysis in children-mind the gap!

Children requiring long-term kidney replacement therapy are a "rare disease" cohort. While the basic technical requirements for hemodialysis (HD) are similar in children and adults, key aspects of the child's cardiovascular anatomy and hemodynamic specifications must be considered. In this article, we describe the technical requirements for long-term HD therapy for children and the devices that are currently available around the world. We highlight the characteristics and major technical shortcomings of permanent central venous catheters, dialyzers, dialysis machines, and software available to clinicians who care for children. We show that currently available HD machines are not equipped with appropriately small circuits and sensitive control mechanisms to perform safe and effective HD in the youngest patients. Manufacturers limit their liability, and health regulatory agencies permit the use of devices, only in children according to the manufacturers' pre-specified weight limitations. Although registries show that 6-23% of children starting long-term HD weigh less than 15 kg, currently, there is only one long-term HD device that is cleared for use in children weighing 10 to 15 kg and none is available and labelled for use in children weighing less than 10 kg anywhere in the world. Thus, many children are being treated "off-label" and are subject to interventions delivered by medical devices that lack pediatric safety and efficacy data. Moreover, recent improvements in dialysis technology offered to adult patients are denied to most children. We, in turn, advocate for concerted action by pediatric nephrologists, industry, and health regulatory agencies to increase the development of dedicated HD machines and equipment for children.

Automated adjustment of dialysate sodium by the hemodialysis monitor: Rationale, implementation, and clinical benefits

Prescribing dialysate sodium is the responsibility of the physician, but there are currently no clear guidelines for this prescription. Furthermore, there is quite frequently a significant difference between prescribed and measured dialysate sodium. Several arguments, both theoretical and experimental, suggest that dialysate sodium should be adjusted individually in such a way as to result in a decreasing sodium profile that takes into account the patient's predialytic natremia. The generalization in clinical routine of this strategy requires the integration into the hemodialysis monitor of software making the machine capable to automatically adjust the dialysate sodium at each session. The only three such softwares that have been integrated into hemodialysis machines for routine clinical use are discussed. All three work with conductivity measurements as a surrogate for sodium concentrations. Although there are only a few publications on the use of these softwares in clinical practice, they appear to result in improved intradialytic tolerance to the dialysis treatment, better control of hypertension, and reduced thirst, leading to decreased interdialytic weight gain.

Sodium First Approach, to Reset Our Mind for Improving Management of Sodium, Water, Volume and Pressure in Hemodialysis Patients, and to Reduce Cardiovascular Burden and Improve Outcomes

New physiologic findings related to sodium homeostasis and pathophysiologic associations require a new vision for sodium, fluid and blood pressure management in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. The traditional dry weight probing approach that has prevailed for many years must be reviewed in light of these findings and enriched by availability of new tools for monitoring and handling sodium and water imbalances. A comprehensive and integrated approach is needed to improve further cardiac health in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Adequate management of sodium, water, volume and hemodynamic control of HD patients relies on a stepwise approach: the first entails assessment and monitoring of fluid status and relies on clinical judgement supported by specific tools that are online embedded in the HD machine or devices used offline; the second consists of acting on correcting fluid imbalance mainly through dialysis prescription (treatment time, active tools embedded on HD machine) but also on guidance related to diet and thirst management; the third consist of fine tuning treatment prescription to patient responses and tolerance with the support of innovative tools such as artificial intelligence and remote pervasive health trackers. It is time to come back to sodium and water imbalance as the root cause of the problem and not to act primarily on their consequences (fluid overload, hypertension) or organ damage (heart; atherosclerosis, brain). We know the problem and have the tools to assess and manage in a more precise way sodium and fluid in HD patients. We strongly call for a sodium first approach to reduce disease burden and improve cardiac health in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients.

Dialysate sodium management in hemodialysis and on-line hemodiafiltration: the single-pool kinetic model revisited

BACKGROUND

Determining the optimal dialysate sodium remains one of the challenges of hemodialysis prescription. Several arguments suggest that the dialysate sodium should be individually adjusted according to the patient's natremia. This strategy is greatly facilitated by using an algorithm. Only three such algorithms have been embedded in hemodialysis machines for the widespread generalization of this strategy in clinical routine: the Diacontrol (Hospal-Baxter Healthcare Corp., Deerfield, IL, USA), the HFR-Aequilibrium (Bellco-Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and the Na-control (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad-Homburg, Germany).

METHODS

Model the solute mass-transfer across the dialyzer membrane in online hemodiafiltration and adapt the Diacontrol algorithm based on a single-pool kinetic model of sodium balance for quantifying ionic balance and managing tonicity.

RESULTS

1) Substituting sodium measurements with conductivity measurements allows the control of tonicity which is a more physiological parameter than natremia. 2) Consideration of all ion exchanges as a whole and not just sodium exchange avoids some of the assumptions required by kinetic modeling of sodium balance. 3) Equations provided by the model are applicable to both hemodialysis and online hemodiafiltration. 4) The differences between this model used by Diacontrol and the models on which the other two software's (HFR-Aequilibrium and Na-control) are based are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

The single-pool kinetic model validated for the management of natremia in hemodialysis is also valid for the management of tonicity for both conventional hemodialysis and all online hemodiafiltration procedures.

Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling in hemodialysis: A long-forgotten issue revisited

Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling are method of dialysis in which dialysate sodium concentration and ultrafiltration rate are altered during the course of the dialysis session. Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling have been used, commonly simultaneously, to improve hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis. Sodium profiling is particularly effective in decreasing the incidence of intradialytic hypotension, while ultrafiltration profiling is suggested to decrease subclinical repeated end organ ischemia during dialysis. However, complications such as increased interdialytic weight gain and thirst due to sodium excess have prevented widespread use of sodium profiling. Evidence suggest that different sodium profiling techniques may lead to different clinical results, and preferring sodium balance neutral sodium profiling may mitigate adverse effects related to sodium overload. However, evidence is lacking on the long-term clinical outcomes of different sodium profiling methods. Optimal method of sodium profiling as well as the utility of sodium/ultrafiltration profiling in routine practice await further clinical investigation.

Quantitative assessment of sodium mass removal using ionic dialysance and sodium gradient as a proxy tool: Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis versus online hemodiafiltration

Restoration and maintenance of sodium are still a matter of concern and remains of critical importance to improve the outcomes in homeostasis of stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis. Sodium mass balance and fluid volume control rely on the "dry weight" probing approach consisting mainly of adjusting the ultrafiltration volume and diet restrictions to patient needs. An additional component of sodium and fluid management relies on adjusting the dialysate-plasma sodium concentration gradient. Hypotonicity of ultrafiltrate in online hemodiafiltration (ol-HDF) might represent an additional risk factor in regard to sodium mass balance. A continuous blood-side approach for quantifying sodium mass balance in hemodialysis and ol-HDF using an online ionic dialysance sensor device ("Flux" method) embedded on hemodialysis machine was explored and compared to conventional cross-sectional "Inventory" methods using anthropometric measurement (Watson), multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (MF-BIA), or online clearance monitoring (OCM) to assess the total body water. An additional dialysate-side approach, consisting of the estimation of inlet/outlet sodium mass balance in the dialysate circuit was also performed. Ten stable hemodialysis patients were included in an "ABAB"-designed study comparing high-flux hemodialysis (hf-HD) and ol-HDF. Results are expressed using a patient-centered sign convention as follows: accumulation into the patient leads to a positive balance while recovery in the external environment (dialysate, machine) leads to a negative balance. In the blood-side approach, a slight difference in sodium mass transfer was observed between models with hf-HD (-222.6 [-585.1-61.3], -256.4 [-607.8-43.7], -258.9 [-609.8-41.3], and -258.5 [-607.8-43.5] mmol/session with Flux and Inventory models using V_Watson , V_MF-BIA , and V_OCM values for the volumes of total body water, respectively; global P value < .0001) and ol-HDF modalities (-235.3 [-707.4-128.3], -264.9 [-595.5-50.8], -267.4 [-598.1-44.1], and -266.0 [-595.6-55.6] mmol/session with Flux and Inventory models using V_Watson , V_MF-BIA , and V_OCM values for the volumes of total body water, respectively; global P value < .0001). Cumulative net ionic mass balance on a weekly basis remained virtually similar in hf-HD and ol-HDF using Flux method (P = n.s.). Finally, the comparative quantification of sodium mass balance using blood-side (Ionic Flux) and dialysate-side approaches reported clinically acceptable (a) agreement (with limits of agreement with 95% confidence intervals (CI): -166.2 to 207.2) and (b) correlation (Spearman's rho = 0.806; P < .0001). We validated a new method to quantify sodium mass balance based on ionic mass balance in dialysis patients using embedded ionic dialysance sensor combined with dialysate/plasma sodium concentrations. This method is accurate enough to support caregivers in managing sodium mass balance in dialysis patients. It offers a bridging solution to automated sodium proprietary balancing module of hemodialysis machine in the future.

A feedback system that combines monitoring of systolic blood pressure and relative blood volume in order to prevent hypotensive episodes during dialysis

Hypotensive Episodes (HEs) are one of the most common complications during dialysis. Occurrence of HEs can be reduced by applying physiological closed loop systems that monitor physiological parameter(s) and adjust dialysis related parameter(s). We developed a physiological closed loop control system (PCLCS) that monitors systolic blood pressure (sysBP) and relative blood volume (RBV) and calculates the net fluid removal (nfr) rate during dialysis. The performance of PCLCS was compared in the laboratory to a feedback system that monitors only RBV (BVFS). A laboratory test setup was developed to test the feedback systems. The test setup simulates nfr-rate and refilling of a patient's intravascular fluid. We studied the impact of the feedback systems PCLCS and BVFS on the number of HEs (sysBP < 90 mmHg), on the variance of sysBP and RBV, on pre to post sysBP and RBV and on the achievement of the nfr-volume. PCLCS allowed 80% less HEs than BVFS (p < 0.001). Variance of sysBP and RBV were reduced by 41.8% and by 52% (p < 0.001), respectively, when using PCLCS. There were no differences between pre to post sysBP nor between pre to post RBV when comparing PCLCS to BVFS. The nfr-volume was achieved by both feedback systems.

Automated individualization of dialysate sodium concentration reduces intradialytic plasma sodium changes in hemodialysis

In standard care, hemodialysis patients are often treated with a center‐specific fixed dialysate sodium concentration, potentially resulting in diffusive sodium changes for patients with plasma sodium concentrations below or above this level. While diffusive sodium load may be associated with thirst and higher interdialytic weight gain, excessive diffusive sodium removal may cause intradialytic symptoms. In contrast, the new hemodialysis machine option “Na control” provides automated individualization of dialysate sodium during treatment with the aim to reduce such intradialytic sodium changes without the need to determine the plasma sodium concentration. This proof‐of‐principle study on sodium control was designed as a monocentric randomized controlled crossover trial: 32 patients with residual diuresis of ≤1000 mL/day were enrolled to be treated by high‐volume post‐dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) for 2 weeks each with “Na control” (individually and automatically adjusted dialysate sodium concentration) versus “standard fixed Na” (fixed dialysate sodium 138 mmol/L), in randomized order. Pre‐ and post‐dialytic plasma sodium concentrations were determined at bedside by direct potentiometry. The study hypothesis consisted of 2 components: the mean plasma sodium change between the start and end of the treatment being within ±1.0 mmol/L for sodium‐controlled treatments, and a lower variability of the plasma sodium changes for “Na control” than for “standard fixed Na” treatments. Three hundred seventy‐two treatments of 31 adult chronic hemodialysis patients (intention‐to‐treat population) were analyzed. The estimate for the mean plasma sodium change was −0.53 mmol/L (95% confidence interval: [−1.04; −0.02] mmol/L) for “Na control” treatments and −0.95 mmol/L (95% CI: [−1.76; −0.15] mmol/L) for “standard fixed Na” treatments. The standard deviation of the plasma sodium changes was 1.39 mmol/L for “Na control” versus 2.19 mmol/L for “standard fixed Na” treatments (P = 0.0004). Whereas the 95% CI for the estimate for the mean plasma sodium change during “Na control” treatments marginally overlapped the lower border of the predefined margin ±1.0 mmol/L, the variability of intradialytic plasma sodium changes was lower during “Na control” versus “standard fixed Na” treatments. Thus, automated dialysate sodium individualization by “Na control” approaches isonatremic dialysis in the clinical setting.

Low dialysate sodium levels for chronic haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in dialysis patients, and strongly associated with fluid overload and hypertension. It is plausible that low dialysate [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension, and ultimately reducing CV morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This review evaluated harms and benefits of using a low (< 138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 7 August 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (< 138 mM) versus neutral (138 to 140 mM) or high (> 140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two investigators independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using random effects models, and results expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 studies randomising 310 patients, with data available for 266 patients after dropout. All but one study evaluated a fixed concentration of low dialysate [Na+], and one profiled dialysate [Na+]. Three studies were parallel group, and the remaining nine cross-over. Of the latter, only two used a washout between intervention and control periods. Most studies were short-term with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3 (3, 8.5) weeks. Two were of a single HD session, and two of a single week's HD. Half of the studies were conducted prior to 2000, and five reported use of obsolete HD practices. Risks of bias in the included studies were often high or unclear, lowering confidence in the results.Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] had the following effects on "efficacy" endpoints: reduced interdialytic weight gain (10 studies: MD -0.35 kg, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.51; high certainty evidence); probably reduced predialysis mean arterial blood pressure (BP) (4 studies: MD -3.58 mmHg, 95% CI -5.46 to -1.69; moderate certainty evidence); probably reduced postdialysis mean arterial BP (MAP) (4 studies: MD -3.26 mmHg, 95% CI -1.70 to -4.82; moderate certainty evidence); probably reduced predialysis serum [Na+] (7 studies: MD -1.69 mM, 95% CI -2.36 to -1.02; moderate certainty evidence); may have reduced antihypertensive medication (2 studies: SMD -0.67 SD, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.28; low certainty evidence). Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] had the following effects on "safety" endpoints: probably increased intradialytic hypotension events (9 studies: RR 1.56, 95% 1.17 to 2.07; moderate certainty evidence); probably increased intradialytic cramps (6 studies: RR 1.77, 95% 1.15 to 2.73; moderate certainty evidence).Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] may make little or no difference to: intradialytic BP (2 studies: MD for systolic BP -3.99 mmHg, 95% CI -17.96 to 9.99; diastolic BP 1.33 mmHg, 95% CI -6.29 to 8.95; low certainty evidence); interdialytic BP (2 studies:, MD for systolic BP 0.17 mmHg, 95% CI -5.42 to 5.08; diastolic BP -2.00 mmHg, 95% CI -4.84 to 0.84; low certainty evidence); dietary salt intake (2 studies: MD -0.21g/d, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.06; low certainty evidence).Due to very low quality of evidence, it is uncertain whether low dialysate [Na+] changed extracellular fluid status, venous tone, arterial vascular resistance, left ventricular mass or volumes, thirst or fatigue. Studies did not examine cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, or hospitalisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It is likely that low dialysate [Na+] reduces intradialytic weight gain and BP, which are effects directionally associated with improved outcomes. However, the intervention probably also increases intradialytic hypotension and reduces serum [Na+], effects that are associated with increased mortality risk. The effect of the intervention on overall patient health and well-being is unknown. Further evidence is needed in the form of longer-term studies in contemporary settings, evaluating end-organ effects in small-scale mechanistic studies using optimal methods, and clinical outcomes in large-scale multicentre RCTs.

[The different modalities of isonatric hemodialysis]

Setting dialysate sodium allows to adequately adjust sodium balance and plasma sodium at the end of dialysis session. In accordance with the set-point theory based on the concept of restoring cellular hydration, an adequate target for plasma sodium at the end of the session could be the value of predialysis plasma sodium concentration (isonatric hemodialysis). Some recently available dialysis monitors provide an on-line value of plasma-water conductivity usually converted in on-line natremia. There are different modalities of isonatric hemodialysis depending on whether the online value of natremia is used or not. By reviewing the few studies concerning the isonatric hemodialysis, it seems logical to set a target of postdialysis on-line natremia (or plasma-water conductivity) slightly lower than its predialysis value. However this strategy requires specifically designed software not yet available in clinical routine.

Sodium Prescription in the Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension: New Insights into an Old Concept

Background: Sodium prescription in patients with intradialytic hypotension remains a challenge for the attending nephrologist, as it increases dialysate conductivity in hypotension-prone patients, thereby adding to dietary sodium levels. Methods: New sodium prescription strategies are now available, including the use of a mathematical model to compute the sodium mass to be removed during dialysis as a physiological controller. Results: This review describes the sodium load of patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis (HD) and discusses 2 strategies to remove excess sodium in patients prone to intradialytic hypotension, namely, Profiled HD and the hemodiafiltration Aequilibrium System. Conclusion: The Profiled HD and Aequilibrium System trial both proved effective in counteracting intradialytic hypotension.

Feasibility of intermittent back-filtrate infusion hemodiafiltration to reduce intradialytic hypotension in patients with cardiovascular instability: a pilot study

Background

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is one of the major problems in performing safe hemodialysis (HD). As blood volume depletion by fluid removal is a major cause of hypotension, careful regulation of blood volume change is fundamental. This study examined the effect of intermittent back-filtrate infusion hemodiafiltration (I-HDF), which modifies infusion and ultrafiltration pattern.

Methods

Purified on-line quality dialysate was intermittently infused by back filtration through the dialysis membrane with a programmed dialysis machine. A bolus of 200 ml of dialysate was infused at 30 min intervals. The volume infused was offset by increasing the fluid removal over the next 30 min by an equivalent amount. Seventy-seven hypotension-prone patients with over 20-mmHg reduction of systolic blood pressure during dialysis or intervention-requirement of more than once a week were included in the crossover study of 4 weeks duration for each modality. In a total of 1632 sessions, the frequency of interventions, the blood pressure, and the pulse rate were documented.

Results

During I-HDF, interventions for symptomatic hypotension were reduced significantly from 4.5 to 3.0 (per person-month, median) and intradialytic systolic blood pressure was 4 mmHg higher on average. The heart rate was lower during I-HDF than HD in the later session. Older patients and those with greater interdialytic weight gain responded to I-HDF.

Conclusions

I-HDF could reduce interventions for IDH. It is accompanied with the increased intradialytic blood pressure and the less tachycardia, suggesting less sympathetic stimulation occurs. Thus, I-HDF could be beneficial for some hypotension-prone patients.

UMIN registration number

000013816.

Natremia, Tonicity, and Conductivity Measurements in Hemodialyzed Patients

Purpose

Natremia is usually considered to reflect tonicity in non-hemodialyzed patients. Some hemodialysis monitors provide an online value (NaCond) of natremia calculated from conductivity measurements. This study compared the relation between tonicity and natremia (NaLab) measured at laboratory with the relation between tonicity and NaCond in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

Fifty-five hemodialysis sessions performed with a Fresenius 5008 dialysis monitor (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany) providing a value of NaCond were analyzed. Tonicity (calculated as “osmolality –urea”), NaLab and NaCond were measured at the beginning and end of sessions.

Results

The r2 correlation-coefficient between tonicity and NaLab is 0.48 (n = 110). The correlation between tonicity and NaCond is stronger (r2 = 0.71).

Conclusions

Conductivity measurements provide a natremia value (NaCond) that is a better surrogate for tonicity than natremia measured at laboratory. Because NaCond is not obtained from sodium measurement, dialysis monitors should display a value for plasma conductivity (mS/cm) instead for natremia (mmol/l).

Association of Predialysis Calculated Plasma Osmolarity With Intradialytic Blood Pressure Decline

BACKGROUND

The rapid reduction in plasma osmolality during hemodialysis (HD) may induce temporary gradients that promote the movement of water from the extracellular to the intracellular compartment, predisposing to the development of intradialytic hypotension (IDH).

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

3,142 prevalent patients receiving thrice-weekly HD from a single dialysis provider organization.

PREDICTOR

Predialysis calculated plasma osmolarity (calculated after the 2-day interval as 2 × serum sodium + serum urea nitrogen/2.8 + serum glucose/18).

OUTCOME

Magnitude of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decline (predialysis SBP - nadir intradialytic SBP) and risk of IDH (SBP decline > 35 or nadir SBP < 90 mm Hg).

MEASUREMENTS

Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted generalized linear models were fit to estimate the association of calculated osmolarity with intradialytic SBP decline and the odds of developing IDH.

RESULTS

Mean age of participants was 62.6±15.2 (SD) years, 57.1% were men, and 61.0% had diabetes. Mean predialysis calculated osmolarity during follow-up was 306.4 ± 9.5 mOsm/L. After case-mix adjustment, each 10-mOsm/L increase in predialysis calculated osmolarity was associated with 1.48 (95% CI, 0.86-2.09) mm Hg (P < 0.001) greater decline in intradialytic SBP and 10% greater odds of IDH (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15). In adjusted models, lower predialysis sodium and higher serum urea nitrogen and serum glucose levels were associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP.

LIMITATIONS

Measured serum osmolality, timing of changes in intradialytic osmolality, dialysate osmolality, and dialysate temperature were not available.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher predialysis calculated osmolarity is associated with greater decline in intradialytic SBP and greater risk of IDH in maintenance HD patients. Strategies to minimize rapid shifts in osmolality should be tested prospectively to minimize excess SBP decline in susceptible patients.

Characterising haemodynamic stress during haemodialysis using the extrema points analysis model

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

It is becoming recognised that the process of haemodialysis (HD) itself induces circulatory stress that could be implicated in the observed higher rate of end-organ damage. We aimed to study the haemodynamic performance during HD using the extrema points (EP) analysis model, and to examine the determinants of the model and its relation to circulatory stress.

METHODS

63 incident HD patients were studied. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) EP frequencies and baroreflex sensitivity during HD were computed for continuous non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring. Pulse-wave velocity as a measure of arterial stiffness was performed. High-sensitivity troponin-T was also measured.

RESULTS

The time of each dialysis session was divided into four quarters. Repeated measures ANOVA of the MAP EP frequencies for all subjects during HD demonstrated a gradual significant increase reaching peak levels at the third quarter of dialysis time and remaining at that peak during the fourth quarter (F(3,171228) = 392.06, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression, lower baroreflex sensitivity was the only independent predictor of higher MAP EP frequencies (β = -0.642, p = 0.001, adjusted R(2) for the whole model = 0.385). In linear regression analysis, higher MAP EP frequencies were associated with higher troponin-T levels (β = 0.442, p = 0.002, R(2) = 0.19, B = 103.29, 95% CI 38.88-167.70).

CONCLUSION

The EP analysis model using MAP is a novel functional haemodynamic measure that can represent and quantify circulatory stress during HD. This measure seems to be determined by the integrity of the autonomic function in HD and could represent the link between circulatory stress and end-organ damage in HD patients.

Effects of sodium on measuring relative blood volume during hemodialysis differ by techniques

Recording the relative blood volume is a standard feature of modern dialysis devices, enabling feedback guidance of ultrafiltration and dialysate conductivity. Technically, the process is based on optical or ultrasonic methods. On the grounds of clinical evidence suggesting a malfunction of the optical hemoglobin (Hb)-dependent absorbance method in the presence of sodium changes, we compared the system with the ultrasonic method. Six patients underwent hemodialysis with a step sodium profile (140, 150, 130, and 140 mmol/L, hourly switch), with two dialysis devices featuring the optical and the ultrasonic blood volume detector, respectively. The ultrasonic system recorded a decreasing blood volume throughout the treatment. With the optical method, changes in dialysate sodium led to inverse deviations of the blood volume curve. In another treatment without profile administering, a bolus of hypertonic sodium led to the detection of a rapid 8.7% reduction in blood volume with the optical method, which was not observed with the ultrasonic device. Blood volume monitors using the optical absorbance device are influenced by osmotic changes. An increase in osmolality produces a paradox drop in the measured blood volume and vice versa rendering the monitor inappropriate for use in sodium profiling.

Optimal dialysate sodium-what is the evidence?

Oligo-anuric patients with end-stage kidney disease are dependent on hemodialysis to achieve and maintain the desired goal of euvolemia. The dialysis prescription, in addition to sodium and fluid restriction, is therefore a critically important factor in the care of hemodialysis patients. Various dialysate sodium concentrations have been favored throughout the history of dialysis, but the "optimal" concentration remains unclear. In this manuscript, we examine the historical context of changes to the dialysate sodium prescription, review the evidence of its associated effects, discuss 'individualization' of dialysate sodium, and highlight the need for definitive trials that are powered for important clinical outcomes.

Dialysis dose and intradialytic hypotension: results from the HEMO study

BACKGROUND

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is common and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients. A higher dialysis 'dose' may generate transient intradialytic osmotic gradients, predisposing to intracellular fluid shifts and resulting in hypotension.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a post hoc analysis of the HEMO study, a multicenter trial that randomized chronic hemodialysis patients to high versus standard Kt/V and higher versus lower membrane flux. In order to achieve dose targets, per protocol, adjustments were made in membrane efficiency, blood flow or dialysate flow before changing session length. Detailed hemodynamic and urea kinetic modeling data were abstracted from 1,825 individuals. The primary outcome was the occurrence of hypotensive events necessitating clinical intervention (saline infusion, lowering of ultrafiltration rate or reduced blood flow).

RESULTS

Intradialytic hypotensive events occurred more frequently in the higher-Kt/V group (18.3 vs. 16.8%; p < 0.001). Participants randomized to higher-target Kt/V had a greater adjusted risk of IDH than those randomized to standard Kt/V [odds ratio (OR) 1.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.25]. Higher vs. lower dialyzer mass transfer-area coefficient for urea and rate of urea removal were associated with greater adjusted odds of IDH (OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.04-1.27 and OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.04-1.06 per mg/dl/h, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher dialysis dose, at relatively constrained treatment times, may associate with an increased risk of IDH. These findings support the possibility that rapidity of intradialytic reductions in plasma osmolality may play an important role in mediating hemodynamic instability during dialysis.

[Fluid overload and arterial hypertension in hemodialysis patients]

The water sodium overload is a factor of morbi-mortality and its treatment is one of the markers of adequacy of the hemodialysis treatment. Its first clinical assessment was improved by tools such as echocardiography and ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava, the per-dialytic curve of plasma volume, measuring BNP or proBNP and by impedancemetry. The combination of the evaluation of these parameters and of the clinical situation allows one to assess the extracellular overload, the state of the blood volume and the potential of plasma refilling. The latter is a key factor of the per-dialytic hemodynamic tolerance. It is itself a determining factor in weight can be achieved at the end of the session. Getting the "dry" weight can require modifications of the prescriptions of the hemodialysis sessions, a filling by albumin even a drugs support. Finally, the overload treatment is the central part of the treatment of arterial hypertension, which has to benefit however often from antihypertensive treatment the profit of which is demonstrated.