Haemodialysis or haemodiafiltration: that is the question

Is hemodiafiltration superior to high-flow hemodialysis in reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in kidney failure patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) and high-flux hemodialysis (hf-HD) are different methods of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) used for the treatment of kidney failure patients. A debate has raged over the last decade about the survival benefit of patients with the use of HDF compared with hf-HD, but with divergent results from randomized controlled trials. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to compare HDF and hf-HD regarding all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched until July 19, 2023, for randomized clinical trials comparing HDF and hf-HD in patients on maintenance dialysis. A meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.1, applying fixed or random effect models according to the heterogeneity between studies.

FINDINGS

Of the 496 studies found, five met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the hf-HD group, the risk ratio (RR) for all-cause mortality with HDF use was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.88, I2 = 0%). HDF was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality, although the sensitivity analysis showed that the result differed between scenarios. Subgroup analysis showed lower all-cause mortality among patients without diabetes in the HDF group compared with hf-HD (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51-0.81, I2 = 0%), but not in diabetic patients (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.65-1.12, I2 = 0.0%). A subgroup analysis considering convection volumes was not performed, but the studies with the highest weight in the meta-analysis described convection volume as more than 20 L/session.

DISCUSSION

More clinical studies considering critical risk factors, such as advanced age and preexisting cardiovascular disease, are needed to confirm the supremacy of HDF over hf-HD on the survival of patients treated by these two forms of kidney replacement therapy.

ABCs of hemodiafiltration prescription: The Pisa style

In end-stage kidney disease patients, hemodiafiltration, a mixed diffusive-convective technique, has shown beneficial effects in terms of improvement of anemia, inflammation, mineral bone disorders, malnutrition and cardiovascular stability. Greater convective volume exchange was also associated with improved overall and cardiovascular survival. However, absolute target threshold volume would be difficult to define and achieve in daily clinical practice, mainly because of differences in patient size. Convective volumes standardized for body surface area would appear to be the simplest approach in clinical practice. Several factors can affect achievement of optimal convective volume, with vascular access being the main limiting factor. Based on our own clinical experience, hemodiafiltration is a more effective and preferable dialysis technique but only when a target convective volume greater than 20 L can be achieved. Conversely, standard high flux hemodialysis or expanded hemodialysis may be helpful and valuable alternative dialysis techniques.

Ultrafiltration Tolerance: A Phenotype That We Need to Recognize

BACKGROUND

The evaluation and management of fluid balance are key challenges in critical care patients who require renal replacement therapies because cumulative fluid balance is an independent factor that increases morbidity and mortality in different clinical scenarios.

SUMMARY

One of the strategies when fluid overload is refractory to diuretics is extracorporeal fluid removal (i.e., net ultrafiltration [UFNET] during kidney replacement therapy). However, problems with UFNET without individualized assessment are cardiovascular events and intradialytic hypotension, events that contribute to decreasing organ perfusion and sympathetic stress. Therefore, we must consider and try to predict the best timing for the start of ultrafiltration and find the point where the patient is most tolerant to ultrafiltration, making a simile to the concept of fluid tolerance.

KEY MESSAGES

UFNET is a continuous and dynamic process, going through moments of tolerance and intolerance to ultrafiltration; as nephrologists, we must take the necessary measures to move through this period.

Unveiling the Clinical Benefits of High-Volume Hemodiafiltration: Optimizing the Removal of Medium-Weight Uremic Toxins and Beyond

Dialysis treatment has improved the survival of patients with kidney failure. However, the hospitalization and mortality rates remain alarmingly high, primarily due to incomplete uremic toxin elimination. High-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) has emerged as a promising approach that significantly improves patient outcomes by effectively eliminating medium and large uremic toxins, which explains its increasing adoption, particularly in Europe and Japan. Interest in this therapy has grown following the findings of the recently published CONVINCE study, as well as the need to understand the mechanisms behind the benefits. This comprehensive review aims to enhance the scientific understanding by explaining the underlying physiological mechanisms that contribute to the positive effects of HDF in terms of short-term benefits, like hemodynamic tolerance and cardiovascular disease. Additionally, it explores the rationale behind the medium-term clinical benefits, including phosphorus removal, the modulation of inflammation and oxidative stress, anemia management, immune response modulation, nutritional effects, the mitigation of bone disorders, neuropathy relief, and amyloidosis reduction. This review also analyzes the impact of HDF on patient-reported outcomes and mortality. Considering the importance of applying personalized uremic toxin removal strategies tailored to the unique needs of each patient, high-volume HDF appears to be the most effective treatment to date for patients with renal failure. This justifies the need to prioritize its application in clinical practice, initially focusing on the groups with the greatest potential benefits and subsequently extending its use to a larger number of patients.

Monitoring of minerals level in dialysate during hemodialysis treatment of kidney patients using LIBS technique

Chronic kidney patients may have difficulties in blood filtration to eliminate the waste from the blood and to maintain the level of the minerals in the blood. Hemodialysis (HD) is an artificial way to remove the waste from the blood of a kidney patient and to maintain the proper mineral level in the blood. Reverse osmosis (RO) water having less total dissolved solids (TDS) < 50 ppm is used to prepare dialysis fluid/dialysate in dialysis with two chemicals (electrolytes and salts such as sodium bicarbonate). To check the purity of RO water from various RO machines used to prepare dialysate, which is vital for the safety of the patient, the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique has been used. Also, the amount of replacement of electrolytes/minerals between the blood of the patient and dialysate after dialysis has been checked/determined for two different machines: hemodialysis machine (HDM) and on-line hemo-dia filtration machine (on-line HDF machine). It is observed that the proper amount of electrolytes (Na, Ca, and Mg) are maintained/normalized (depending upon patient's need), excess K is removed, and excess urea and creatinine is removed continuously from the blood of a patient during dialysis treatment which is essential for the better health of a kidney patient. Our results show that the RO water used in on-line HDF machine is purer (i.e., ultrapure); therefore, the quality of life of a kidney patient may be better if dialysis is performed with the on-line HDF machine. The experimental results also show that the filtration capacity of the dialyzer decreases after reusing it many times for dialysis treatment.

Comparison of measured vs kinetic-model predicted phosphate removal during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND

To what extent hemodiafiltration (HDF) improves management of hyperphosphatemia over hemodialysis (HD) is a subject of ongoing investigation.

METHODS

We modified a previously described phosphate kinetic model to include incorporation of EUDIAL recommended equations for hemodiafiltration (HDF) clearance. We used the model to predict the recovery of phosphate from spent dialysate/hemofiltrate and compared this with averaged data from five published studies. Mean study average predialysis serum phosphate was 1.81 ± 0.20 mmol/L. Session length was close to 240 min per treatment. All HDF was done postdilution, at an average rate of 65 ± 24 mL/min.

RESULTS

Measured mean phosphate removal was 1039 ± 136 mg (33.5 ± 4.41 mmol, slightly lower than the model-predicted mean value of 1092 ± 127 mg (35.3 ± 4.09 mmol). The measured ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.15 ± 0.22, ranging from 1.01 to 1.44. Using mean study input parameters for patient size and treatment characteristics, the predicted ratio of phosphate removal with HDF compared with HD averaged 1.095 ± 0.029, ranging from 1.05 to 1.13.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of EUDIAL-recommended convective clearance equations to a phosphate kinetic model predicts a 10% or greater benefit in terms of phosphate removal for HDF compared with HD at typical dialysis and hemodiafiltration treatment settings. These predictions are similar to the HDF advantage reported in the literature in studies where phosphate removal has been measured in spent dialysate.

Why should we focus on high-volume hemodiafiltration?

Though noticeable technological advances related to hemodialysis (HD) have been made, unfortunately, the survival rate of dialysis patients has yet to improve significantly. However, recent research findings reveal that online hemodiafiltration (HDF) significantly improves patient survival in comparison to conventional HD. Accordingly, the number of patients receiving online HDF is increasing. Although the mechanism driving the benefit has not yet been fully elucidated, survival advantages are mainly related to the lowering of cardiovascular mortality. High cardiovascular mortality among HD patients is seemingly attributable to the cardiovascular changes that occur in response to renal dysfunction and the HD-induced myocardial stress and injury, and online HDF appears to improve such secondary cardiovascular changes. Interestingly, patient survival improves only if the convection volume is supplied sufficiently over a certain level during online HDF treatment. In other words, survival improvement from online HDF is related to convection volume. Therefore, there is a growing interest in high-volume HDF in terms of improving the survival rate. The survival improvement will require a minimum convection volume of 23 L or more per 4-hour session for postdilution HDF. To obtain an optimal high convection volume in online HDF, several factors, such as the treatment time, blood flow rate, filtration fraction, and dialyzer, need to be considered. High-volume HDF can be performed easily and safely in routine clinical practice. Therefore, when the required equipment is available, performing high-volume HDF will help to improve the survival rate of dialysis patients.

Global real-world data on hemodiafiltration: An opportunity to complement clinical trial evidence

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is a renal replacement therapy that utilizes both diffusive clearance and convective transport to achieve greater clearance of middle-molecular-weight solutes. Among other factors, important prerequisites for the implementation of HDF include access to high-flux dialyzers, achievement of high blood flow rates, and availability of high volumes of sterile substitution/replacement fluids. Online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) is an established kidney replacement therapy, frequently used in many countries. Although in the United States, some prerequisites (e.g., access to high-flux dialyzers and achievement of high blood flow rates) for OL-HDF treatment are readily available; however, a machine capable of generating the online solution for OL-HDF is currently not available. As the clinical experience with HDF accumulates globally, it is worth examining the evidence for this kidney replacement therapy as used in routine clinical care. Such real-world evidence is increasingly recognized as valuable by clinicians and may inform regulatory decisions. In this review, we will focus on emerging global real-world data derived from routine clinical practices and examine how these data may complement those derived from clinical trials.

Unconventional T cells and kidney disease

Unconventional T cells are a diverse and underappreciated group of relatively rare lymphocytes that are distinct from conventional CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells, and that mainly recognize antigens in the absence of classical restriction through the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). These non-MHC-restricted T cells include mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, γδ T cells and other, often poorly defined, subsets. Depending on the physiological context, unconventional T cells may assume either protective or pathogenic roles in a range of inflammatory and autoimmune responses in the kidney. Accordingly, experimental models and clinical studies have revealed that certain unconventional T cells are potential therapeutic targets, as well as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers. The responsiveness of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and MAIT cells to many microbial pathogens, for example, has implications for early diagnosis, risk stratification and targeted treatment of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis. The expansion of non-Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells during cytomegalovirus infection and their contribution to viral clearance suggest that these cells can be harnessed for immune monitoring and adoptive immunotherapy in kidney transplant recipients. In addition, populations of NKT, MAIT or γδ T cells are involved in the immunopathology of IgA nephropathy and in models of glomerulonephritis, ischaemia-reperfusion injury and kidney transplantation.

Effect of low-flux and high-flux dialysis membrane on plasma concentrations of cardiac troponin I

Aim: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) concentration stability during dialysis have not been fully elucidated. The aim is to evaluate the effect of a single dialysis session on plasma cTnI. Patients & methods: From 122 consecutive anuric adult patients (75 [61.5%] men, age 27-86 years, median 67) on chronic hemodialysis blood samples for cTnI measurement were taken before and after a dialysis. Results: Dialysis had no effect on high-flux membranes (geometric means ratio = 0.99, 0.94-1.05, df 119, t = -0.19, multiplicity adjusted p = 0.847), but cTnI levels were higher after dialysis in patients on low-flux membranes (geometric means ratio = 1.14, 1.02-1.27, df 119, t = 2.59, adjusted p = 0.021). Conclusion: Dialysis session using low-flux membranes might increase the plasma cTnI.

Toward an individualized determination of dialysis adequacy: a narrative review with special emphasis on incremental hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

The search for the 'perfect' renal replacement therapy has been paralleled by the search for the perfect biomarkers for assessing dialysis adequacy. Three main families of markers have been assessed: small molecules (prototype: urea); middle molecules (prototype β2-microglobulin); comprehensive and nutritional markers (prototype of the simplified assessment, albumin levels; composite indexes as malnutrition-inflammation score). After an era of standardization of dialysis treatment, personalized dialysis schedules are increasingly proposed, challenging the dogma of thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we describe the advantages and limitations of the approaches mentioned above, focusing on the open questions regarding personalized schedules and incremental hemodialysis.

EXPERT OPINION

In the era of personalized dialysis, the assessment of dialysis adequacy should be likewise personalized, due to the limits of 'one size fits all' approaches. We have tried to summarize some of the relevant issues regarding the determination of dialysis adequacy, attempting to adapt them to an elderly, highly comorbidity population, which would probably benefit from tailor-made dialysis prescriptions. While no single biomarker allows precisely tailoring the dialysis dose, we suggest using a combination of clinical and biological markers to prescribe dialysis according to comorbidity, life expectancy, residual kidney function, and small and medium-size molecule depuration.

Multidisciplinary Perspectives of Current Approaches and Clinical Gaps in the Management of Hyperphosphatemia

Population-based studies have shown that most patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) do not have optimal phosphate levels. Meta-analyses suggest that there is a morbidity and mortality benefit associated with the lowering of serum phosphate levels. However, to date there is no conclusive evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that lowering serum phosphate levels reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality. However, hyperphosphatemia may pose a risk to patients and treatment should be considered. We therefore sought to conduct a multidisciplinary review to help guide clinical decision-making pending results of ongoing RCTs. Restricting dietary phosphate intake is frequently the first step in the management of hyperphosphatemia. Important considerations when proposing dietary restriction include the patient's socioeconomic status, lifestyle, dietary preferences, comorbidities, and nutritional status. While dietary phosphate restriction may be a valid strategy in certain patients, serum phosphate reductions achieved solely by limiting dietary intake are modest and should be considered in conjunction with other interventions. Conventional dialysis is also typically insufficient; however phosphate removal may be augmented by increased frequency or duration of dialysis, or through enhanced methods such as hemodiafiltration. Phosphate binders have been shown to reduce absorption of dietary phosphate and lower serum phosphate levels. There are several phosphate binders available, and while they all lower phosphate levels to variable degrees, they differ with respect to their pill burden, potential to induce or exacerbate vascular calcification or ectopic calcification, tissue accumulation, safety, and tolerability. The widespread treatment of hyperphosphatemia requires convincing data from RCTs to ascertain whether lowering serum phosphate levels improves patient-important outcomes, as well as the optimal method and degree of phosphate control. In the interim, the decision and approach used to treat hyperphosphatemia should be based on the best available data, as well as patient needs and clinical judgment.

Precision medicine in transplantation and hemodialysis

In kidney transplantation, precision medicine has already entered clinical practice. Donor and recipient human leucocyte antigen (HLA) regions are genotyped in two class 1 and usually three class 2 loci, and the individual degree of sensitization against alloimmune antigens is evaluated by the detection of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. Recently, the contribution of non-HLA mismatches to outcomes such as acute T- and B-cell-mediated rejection and even long-term graft survival was described. Tracking of specific alloimmune T- and B-cell clones by next generation sequencing and refinement of the immunogenicity of allo-epitopes specifically in the interaction with HLA and T- and B-cell receptors may further support individualized therapy. Although the choices of maintenance immunosuppression are rather limited, individualization can be accomplished by adjustment of dosing based on these risk predictors. Finally, supplementing histopathology by a transcriptomics analysis allows for a biological interpretation of the histological findings and avoids interobserver variability of results. In contrast to transplantation, the prescription of hemodialysis therapy is far from precise. Guidelines do not consider modifications by age, diet or many comorbid conditions. Patients with residual kidney function routinely receive the same treatment as those without. A major barrier hitherto is the definition of 'adequate' treatment based on urea removal. Kt/Vurea and related parameters neither reflect the severity of uremic symptoms nor predict long-term outcomes. Urea is poorly representative for numerous other compounds that accumulate in the body when the kidneys fail, yet clinicians prescribe treatment based on its measurement. Modern technology has provided the means to identify other solutes responsible for specific features of uremic illness and their measurement will be a necessary step in moving beyond the standardized prescription of hemodialysis.

Real-world management of hyperphosphataemia with sucroferric oxyhydroxide: the VELREAL multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SO) have been reported in clinical trials. However, real-life data are scarce. This study presents data on the use, efficacy and safety of SO in real clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicentre study, without any influence on the prescription decisions, that included 220 patients from 11 Spanish centres. Demographic, treatment, analytical and nutritional parameters and adherence, side effects and dropout rates were collected during 6 months.

RESULTS

SO was initiated due to inadequate control of serum phosphate (P) in 70% of participants and in 24.5% to reduce the number of tablets. Monotherapy with SO increased from 44% to 74.1%, with a reduction in the average daily number of sachets/tablets from six to two. Serum P decreased by 20% (4.6 ± 1.2 versus 5.8 ± 1.3 mg/dL; P < 0.001), with a significant reduction in intact parathyroid hormone levels (P < 0.01). The percentage of patients with adequate serum P control at threshold levels of 5 and 4.5 mg/dL increased by 45.4% and 35.9%, respectively. Serum ferritin was not modified, while the transferrin saturation index increased significantly (P = 0.04). Serum albumin and normalized protein catabolic rate, when normalized by serum P, increased, averaging 37% and 39%, respectively (P < 0.001). Adherent patients increased from 28.2% to 52.7%. Adverse effects were reported by 14.1% of participants, with abandonment of treatment in 9.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SO in real-life results in better control of serum P, a reduction in the number of tablets and an improvement in therapeutic adherence. In addition, it may be beneficial with regards to secondary hyperparathyroidism and nutritional status.

The Dialyzer Identification Code (DIC): A filter characteristics codification for dialyzer choice in renal replacement therapy

The dialyzer is the core element of extracorporeal blood purification therapies where several processes take place depending on specific membrane characteristics. To date, the filter choice requires preliminary knowledge of all its characteristics as they cannot be easily deduced from the commercial trade name, hence the difficulty in identifying easily equivalent dialyzers and clearly comparing single-filter characteristics. The choice of improper dialyzers for a specific treatment can determine a less-effective blood purification and potentially harmful treatments. We aimed to propose a univocal and standardized alphanumeric string to summarize essential filter properties in the Dialyzer Identification Code (DIC). DIC clearly describes device characteristics and allows to compare different dialyzer performances without resorting to the technical data sheets. Therefore, the presence of the DIC on every device facilitates information retrieval on the dialyzer, its intended use, and can facilitate matching the dialysis modality to correct dialyzers achieving a personalized renal replacement therapy. The standard filter characteristics codification by the DIC may further optimize correct extracorporeal blood purification prescriptions and the use of equivalent filters from different providers avoiding treatment inefficiency, clinical complications, and improving patient safety.

Nanobody-Based high-performance immunosorbent for selective beta 2-microglobulin purification from blood

Removing β2-microglobulin (β2M) from blood circulation is considered to be the most effective method to delay the occurrence of dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA). The ideal extracorporeal β2M removal system should be cost-effective, highly specific and having a high capacity. However, the traditional technologies based on size exclusion do not have an adequate specificity, and alternative immunosorbents have limited applications due to low capacity and their high cost. Nanobodies (Nbs), the smallest functional recombinant antibody fragments, offer several advantages to overcome these obstacles. In this study, an anti-β2M Nb with a C-terminal thiol-tag was successfully prepared from E. coli for site-directed and oriented immobilization and usage as capture ligand in a β2M-selective immunosorbent. The prepared immunosorbent showed a high binding capacity of up to 7 mg β2M per mL resin, which is 17 times higher than that of previous studies using single-chain variable antibody fragments (scFv). Furthermore, an exceptional high specificity has been demonstrated as other human serum proteins were not adsorbed during dynamic adsorption experiments. About 80% of the original binding capacity of the immunosorbent was restored after four consecutive easy regenerations, whereas 90% of the original capacity was retained after 1-month storage of the resin. Moreover, the mathematical model fitted very well the in vitro perfusion. The results with this pioneering immunosorbent confirm its possible clinical application and is expected to reach the required clinical effect of immunoadsorption therapy. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), associated with the accumulation of β2-microglobulin (β2M), is a serious complication of end-stage kidney disease. Removing β2M from blood circulation by extracorporeal blood purification is considered to be the most effective method to delay the occurrence of DRA. However, the existing methods are incapable to eliminate sufficient quantities of β2M from circulation, either because of lack of specificity, high cost or for low capacity. In this manuscript, we provide a practical and economic immunosorbent based on anti-β2M nanobody for DRA. The prepared immunosorbent was reusable and storable, and demonstrated high specificity and realized a high binding capacity of up to 7 mg β2M per mL resin, which is 17 times higher than that of the previous studies.

Strategies for Phosphate Control in Patients With CKD

Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in those requiring renal replacement therapy. The importance of controlling serum phosphate has long been recognized based on observational epidemiological studies that linked increased phosphate levels to adverse outcomes and higher mortality risk. Experimental data further supported the role of phosphate in the development of bone and cardiovascular diseases. Recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in phosphate homeostasis have made it clear that the serum phosphate concentration depends on a complex interplay among the kidneys, intestinal tract, and bone, and is tightly regulated by a complex endocrine system. Moreover, the source of dietary phosphate and the use of phosphate-based additives in industrialized foods are additional factors that are of particular importance in CKD. Not surprisingly, the management of hyperphosphatemia is difficult, and, despite a multifaceted approach, it remains unsuccessful in many patients. An additional issue is the fact that the supposedly beneficial effect of phosphate lowering on hard clinical outcomes in interventional trials is a matter of ongoing debate. In this review, we discuss currently available treatment approaches for controlling hyperphosphatemia, including dietary phosphate restriction, reduction of intestinal phosphate absorption, phosphate removal by dialysis, and management of renal osteodystrophy, with particular focus on practical challenges and limitations, and on potential benefits and harms.

Global prevalent use, trends and practices in haemodiafiltration

Online haemodiafiltration (HDF) represents today the most advanced and innovative form of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Recent controlled trials tend to prove its superiority over conventional haemodialysis on hard clinical end points provided that the right convective dose was delivered. In this article we report on present prevalent use and epidemiologic trends of HDF worldwide as well as on practice patterns in HDF prescription. In addition we analyze factors that may affect HDF clinical acceptance and more widely its implementation. National and international renal registries provide valuable demographic and epidemiologic information on end stage kidney disease patients on RRT. However, the updating and maintenance of such information system is particularly challenging at a country level and even more so on an international basis. Lag time, incompleteness and/or imprecision of data collection may further hamper precision and validity of data reporting. Fresenius Medical Care (FMC), as a large dialysis care provider operating worldwide, maintains an annually updated database addressing international end stage kidney disease data. Over the last decade, FMC has produced series of precise and reliable reports analyzing RRT trends and practices worldwide. The present overview and analysis is based on our consolidated data from market survey as well as national database registries and databases of recent studies. Online HDF acceptance is growing fast in the two leading regions having approved the method, i.e. Europe and Asia Pacific, with a patient average growth rate of 12 to 24%, being far above the total patient HD growth rate of 6.6%. Today online HDF represents a new paradigm shift in RRT with promising clinical results. Further initiatives (e.g., Kidney Health Initiative, NICE) might provide further push for promoting HDF as a new standard of care in end stage kidney disease patients on a global scale.