Knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding arteriovenous fistulas among uremic patients undergoing haemodialysis in China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) regarding arteriovenous fistula (AVF) care in uremic patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD).

DESIGN

A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted among uremic patients receiving HD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between April 2023 and June 2023.

SETTING

The study took place at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 522 valid questionnaires were collected from patients undergoing HD, representing 85.57% of the 610 patients eligible for the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Pathway analysis was used to assess the interplay among KAP scores related to AVF care in the participants.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The study evaluated KAP scores (ranging 0-20, 8-40 and 6-30, respectively) to gauge patients' KAP regarding AVF care.

RESULTS

The findings indicated that patients exhibited adequate knowledge, positive attitudes and proactive practices towards AVF care. Patients' knowledge directly influenced their attitudes and practices, with attitudes also positively impacting practices. Additionally, knowledge indirectly affected practices through attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

Uremic patients undergoing HD demonstrated satisfactory understanding, favourable attitudes and proactive behaviours concerning AVF care. The pathway analysis provided insights into the relationships between KAP, illustrating the direct and indirect effects of these factors on each other in the context of AVF care among patients.

Prospective Analysis of Arteriovenous Fistula Performance in the Context of Competing Risks

Background:

Many patients with newly created arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) may die before the AVF is needed for hemodialysis. However, formal competing risks frameworks are rarely used to report AVF patency, which may lead to biased estimates. We sought to identify the proportion of newly created AVF experiencing primary non-function and to describe long-term patency using a competing risk framework.

Methods:

We did a prospective observational study in 257 adults with newly created AVF in Alberta, Canada. The primary outcome was primary non-function. Secondary outcomes included loss of primary-patency, loss of assisted primary-patency, and loss of secondary functional-patency. Results were presented using icon-array plots to form the basis for future decision aids.

Results:

Participants were 63.0% male with mean age 62.3 years and median follow-up of 18.5 months (range 0.02-180 months). Of 257 participants, 50 could not be assessed for function or primary non-function, usually due to death. Of the remaining 207, 102 (49.3%) had primary non-function, and function was ultimately established for 142 (68.6%). Thus, only 142 of the 257 participants (55.3%) ultimately used the AVF for hemodialysis. High rates of competing risks led to biased results from Kaplan-Meier analyses of lost patency. When accounting for competing risks, loss of primary-patency among AVF with established function was 36.6%, 65.5% and 66.2%, at 1y, 3y and 5y respectively.

Conclusions:

Only 55% of fistulas were ultimately used for hemodialysis when accounting for competing risks and primary non-function. These results and the icon-array plots may inform discussions surrounding vascular access options for patients.

Use of vascular access methods for hemodialysis in Serbia: Results from SerbVasc registry

INTRODUCTION

In many countries, hemodialysis is still the most common method of renal replacement. Significant regional variations exist in creating and maintaining vascular access for hemodialysis. Therefore, analyzing national registries with vascular access data is essential for developing effective national treatment strategies. The Serbian national vascular surgery registry was established as part of the VascuNet collaboration network in 2019. The registry comprehensively records vascular procedures across Serbia, including those related to vascular access for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of different vascular access methods for hemodialysis in Serbia, focusing on both new and prevalent patients and examining demographic differences and risk factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data were collected from the vascular accesses section of the SerbVasc registry over a 3-year observational period, focusing on the following aspects: number of incident and prevalent patients with types of vascular access, as well as comparison of patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), arteriovenous grafts (AVG), central venous catheters (CVC), and tCVC based on age, gender, smoking, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

There were total of 1024 incident hemodialysis patients. AVF was created in 219 patients (21.4%), AVG in 5 patients (0.5%), and tCVC in 150 patients (14.6%), while hemodialysis via CVC was initiated in 650 (63.5%) patients. The total number of permanent vascular accesses for HD was 1402, comprising 686 (48.9%) distal AFVs, 220 (15.7%) proximal AVFs, 91 (6.4%) AVGs, and 405 (28.8%) tCVCs. The prevalence of current smoking was highest in the tCVC (48.3%) and lowest in the dAVF group (18.40%).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of patients starting hemodialysis with AVF remains suboptimal. tCVC is used substantially as first and permanent access, particularly among older patients.

Vascular access type and prognosis in elderly hemodialysis patients: a propensity-score-matched study

BACKGROUND

To compare the impact of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) on outcomes in elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective matched cohort study was performed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance the baseline conditions, and we compared all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), hospitalization, and infection rates between AVF and TCC patients ≥70 years old. Cox survival analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for death.

RESULTS

There were 2119 patients from our center in the Chinese National Renal Data System (CNRDS) between 1 January 2010 and 10 October 2023. Among these patients, 77 TCC patients were matched with 77 AVF patients. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the TCC and AVF groups (30.1/100 vs. 33.3/100 patient-years, p = 0.124). Among the propensity score-matched cohorts, no significant differences in Kaplan-Meier curves were observed between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.242). The TCC group had higher rates of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection than the AVF group (33.7/100 vs. 29.5/100 patient-years, 101.2/100 vs. 79.5/100 patient-years, and 30.1/100 vs. 14.1/100 patient-years, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was a risk factor for death.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between elderly HD patients receiving TCCs and AVFs. Compared with those with a TCC, elderly HD patients with an AVF have a lower risk of MACCEs, hospitalization, and infection.

Tunneled central venous catheters for hemodialysis-unfairly condemned? Catheter-related complications in a university hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheters (CVCs) provide an immediate hemodialysis access but are considered to be of elevated risk for complications. It remains unclear, if CVCs per se have relevant impact on clinical outcome. We provide an assessment of CVC-associated complications and their impact on mortality.

METHODS

In a single center retrospective study, CVC patients between JAN2015-JUN2021 were included. Data on duration of CVC use, complications and comorbidities was collected. Estimated 6-month mortality was compared to actual death rate.

RESULTS

About 478 CVCs were analyzed. Initiation of dialysis was the main reason for CVC implantation. Death was predominant for termination of CVC use. Infections were rare (0.6/1000 catheter days), complications were associated with certain comorbidities. Actual 6-month mortality was lower than predicted (14.3% vs 19.6%).

CONCLUSION

(1) CVCs are predominantly implanted for initiation of hemodialysis; (2) serious complications are rare; (3) complications are associated with certain comorbidities; and (4) CVC patients survive longer than predicted.

Global variations in funding and use of hemodialysis accesses: an international report using the ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of contemporary data describing global variations in vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). We used the third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to highlight differences in funding and availability of hemodialysis accesses used for initiating HD across world regions.

METHODS

Survey questions were directed at understanding the funding modules for obtaining vascular access and types of accesses used to initiate dialysis. An electronic survey was sent to national and regional key stakeholders affiliated with the ISN between June and September 2022. Countries that participated in the survey were categorized based on World Bank Income Classification (low-, lower-middle, upper-middle, and high-income) and by their regional affiliation with the ISN.

RESULTS

Data on types of vascular access were available from 160 countries. Respondents from 35 countries (22% of surveyed countries) reported that > 50% of patients started HD with an arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF or AVG). These rates were higher in Western Europe (n = 14; 64%), North & East Asia (n = 4; 67%), and among high-income countries (n = 24; 38%). The rates of > 50% of patients starting HD with a tunneled dialysis catheter were highest in North America & Caribbean region (n = 7; 58%) and lowest in South Asia and Newly Independent States and Russia (n = 0 in both regions). Respondents from 50% (n = 9) of low-income countries reported that > 75% of patients started HD using a temporary catheter, with the highest rates in Africa (n = 30; 75%) and Latin America (n = 14; 67%). Funding for the creation of vascular access was often through public funding and free at the point of delivery in high-income countries (n = 42; 67% for AVF/AVG, n = 44; 70% for central venous catheters). In low-income countries, private and out of pocket funding was reported as being more common (n = 8; 40% for AVF/AVG, n = 5; 25% for central venous catheters).

CONCLUSIONS

High income countries exhibit variation in the use of AVF/AVG and tunneled catheters. In low-income countries, there is a higher use of temporary dialysis catheters and private funding models for access creation.

Comparison of the effect of heparin, reteplase, and taurolock in the prevention of thrombosis in hemodialysis catheters

Background and Aim

One of the complications of using catheters is the occurrence of thrombosis, which can be dangerous for patients. The main objective of this study is to compare the effect of heparin, reteplase, and taurolock in the prevention of thrombosis in hemodialysis catheters.

Methods

The present study is a clinical trial, in which the effect of three drugs, heparin, reteplase, and taurolock, in the prevention of thrombosis in hemodialysis catheters, has been investigated. The research units were studied in two intervention and control groups. The stratified random allocation method was used to assign patients to five groups (control, Heparin 50, Heparin 1000, reteplase, and taurolock), with strata based on the patient's age (20-70 years), gender, and duration of dialysis. Within each stratum, patients were also assigned to groups using the randomized block permutation method and a random number table tool. To prevent bias, this study is triple-blinded. This means that the patient, the thrombosis assessor, and the statistical analyst are unaware of the type of intervention received by the patient.

Results

Gender (p < 0.999), age distribution (p = 0.774), and duration of dialysis (p = 0.875) showed no statistically significant relationship with thrombosis. However, significant differences were observed among the five groups regarding thrombosis incidence. The relative risk of thrombosis in the Heparin 50, Heparin 1000, reteplase, and taurolock groups compared to the control group was 92.5%, 92.2%, 98.2%, and 89% lower, respectively.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the efficacy of heparin, reteplase, and taurolock in preventing thrombosis in hemodialysis catheters. While all three drugs demonstrated efficacy, the Heparin 50 group exhibited the highest relative risk reduction. These findings suggest that heparin, particularly at a low dose, should be considered a standard prophylactic treatment in hemodialysis patients.

A meta-analysis of vascular access outcomes in hemodialysis patients aged 75 years or older

BACKGROUND

Several existing guidelines advocate the access creation without any specific recommendations for those patients over 75 years of age. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcomes of different vascular access procedures in the sub-group of elderly ESRD patients ⩾75 years of age.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE and SCOPUS electronic databases. The analysis focused on studies with subgroups of elderly patients ⩾75 years of age with different vascular access procedures, and compared the failure rates of autologous versus prosthetic vascular access. Articles comparing patency rates of distal (forearm) versus proximal upper arm AVFs were also investigated.

RESULTS

Twelve relevant studies were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results revealed a statistically significant unassisted (primary) failure rate at 24 months in favor of autologous AVFs [odds ratio (OR): 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.83, p = 0.003]. A secondary analysis revealed significantly higher 12 months unassisted (primary) and secondary failure rates of forearm AVFs compared with proximal upper arm AVFs (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.53-2.97, p < 0.00001 and OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.12-2.78, p < 0.01 respectively).

CONCLUSION

An increased risk of failure of prosthetic vascular access procedures was found compared with autologous AVFs in patients ⩾75 years of age. Elderly patients ⩾75 years should not be excluded from creation of an autologous access, with proximal upper arm AVFs having better patency rates.

Comparing post-maturation outcomes of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae

BACKGROUND

Though arteriovenous grafts (AVG) mature more reliably than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and require fewer maturation procedures (MP) to obtain functional patency, AVG are thought to have worse function after maturation. We explored differences in post-maturation outcomes between the following groups: AVF patients who did (AS-AVF) and did not (unAS-AVF) require assisted maturation and AVG patients who did (AS-AVG) and did not (unAS-AVG) require assisted maturation.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System (2012-2017), we retrospectively identified patients who initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter, underwent AVF or AVG placement and achieved successful two-needle cannulation. Primary patency and access abandonment after maturation were compared across groups using competing risks regression methods, generating sub-hazards ratios (sHR).

RESULTS

We identified 42,664 AVF and 12,335 AVG that met inclusion criteria. A larger proportion of AVFs required interventions: 18,408 AVF (43.2%) versus 2594 AVG (21.0%; p < 0.01). Both AS-AVG and AS-AVF patients experienced patency loss at 1 year more frequently compared with unAS-AVG (67.5% & 57.5% vs 55.2% respectively). Patency loss was lowest in unAS-AVF (38.9%). These trends were robust on adjusted analysis (unAS-AVG reference, AS-AVG sHR = 1.44, p < 0.01; AS-AVF sHR = 1.08, p < 0.01, unAS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01). AS-AVGs were more likely to be abandoned than unAS-AVGs (11.7% unAS-AVG vs 17.2% AS-AVG). Fistulae, assisted or not, had lower unadjusted rates of 1-year abandonment than grafts (8.9% AS-AVF vs 7.3% unAS-AVF). On adjusted analysis, AVF usage was protective against abandonment (unAS-AVG, reference; AS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01; unAS-AVF sHR = 0.59, p < 0.01) while AS-AVG was not (AS-AVG sHR = 1.32, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

unAS-AVF have the best long-term outcomes. AS-AVF lose primary patency at a higher rate than unAS-AVG. AVGs may be a better choice than AVFs if veins are marginal and likely to require assisted maturation. Further research is needed to identify anatomic and physiologic factors that affect long-term performance and influence conduit choice.

Dialysis for older adults: why should the targets be different?

The number of patients aged > 75-years treated by dialysis continues to increase, particularly in developed countries. Haemodialysis is a well-established treatment with national and international clinical guidelines designed to provide patients with optimal treatment. However, these were developed when the dialysis population was younger, and less co-morbid. This change in patient demographics questions whether these guideline targets still apply to older patients. More patients now start dialysis with residual kidney function and could benefit from a less frequent dialysis schedule. Older patients have a lower thirst drive, so lower interdialytic gains, reduced appetite, muscle mass and physical activity would potentially allow starting dialysis with less frequent sessions a practical option. Similarly, patients with residual kidney function and lower metabolic activity may not need to meet current dialyser Kt/Vurea clearance targets to remain healthy. Instead, some elderly patients may be at risk of malnutrition and might need liberalisation of the low salt, potassium and phosphate dietary restrictions, or even additional supplements to ensure adequate protein intake. Although a fistula is the preferred vascular access, a forearm fistula may not be an option due to vascular disease, while a brachial fistula can potentially compromise cardiovascular reserve, so a dialysis catheter becomes the de facto access, especially in patients with limited life expectancy. Thus, clinical guideline targets designed for a younger less co-morbid dialysis population may not be equally applicable to the older patient initiating dialysis, and so a more individualised approach to dialysis prescription and vascular access is required.

Shared decision making in elderly patients with kidney failure

'Elderly' is most commonly defined as an individual aged 65 years or older. However, this definition fails to account for the differences in genetics, lifestyle and overall health that contribute to significant heterogeneity among the elderly beyond chronological age. As the world population continues to age, the prevalence of chronic diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), is increasing and CKD frequently progresses to kidney failure. Moreover, frailty represents a multidimensional clinical entity highly prevalent in this population, which needs to be adequately assessed to inform and support medical decisions. Selecting the optimal treatment pathway for the elderly and frail kidney failure population, be it haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or conservative kidney management, is complex because of the presence of comorbidities associated with low survival rates and impaired quality of life. Management of these patients should involve a multidisciplinary approach including doctors from various specialties, nurses, psychologists, dieticians and physiotherapists. Studies are mostly retrospective and observational, lacking adjustment for confounders or addressing selection and indication biases, making it difficult to use these data to guide treatment decisions. Throughout this review we discuss the difficulty of making a one-size-fits-all recommendation for the clinical needs of older patients with kidney failure. We advocate that a research agenda for optimization of the critical issues we present in this review be implemented. We recommend prospective studies that address these issues, and systematic reviews incorporating the complementary evidence of both observational and interventional studies. Furthermore, we strongly support a shared decision-making process matching evidence with patient preferences to ensure that individualized choices are made regarding dialysis vs conservative kidney management, dialysis modality and optimal vascular access.

Ankle-brachial index associates with arteriovenous fistula stenosis

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenosis is associated with pre-existing arterial atherosclerosis of AVF and results in significant morbidity and hospitalization for hemodialysis patients. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a noninvasive method of assessing atherosclerosis. This study was to examine whether ABI is a significant predictor for AVF stenosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study. Patients with hemodialysis between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 were reviewed. ABI was assessed in January 2016. AVF stenosis was diagnosed by fistulography.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included. Forty-two patients experienced AVF stenosis. The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that AVF stenosis was associated with age (OR: 1.045, p = 0.033), DM status (OR: 5.529, p = 0.013), 7-year averaged cholesterol level (OR: 1.018, p = 0.034), 7-year averaged triglyceride level (OR: 1.007, p = 0.017), and ABI (OR: 0.011, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, ABI was a strong predictor for AVF stenosis (OR: 0.036, p = 0.023). Then, a cut-off point of ABI with optimal sensitivity and specificity for AVF stenosis was 1.01. An analysis of time to events with adjustment for other variables showed that patients with ABI < 1.01 were significantly associated with AVF stenosis (HR: 3.859, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ABI below 1.01 was associated with AVF stenosis. This finding may be useful in tailoring surveillance programs for monitoring AVF function.

Efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty versus high-pressure balloon angioplasty for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula stenoses in patients undergoing hemodialysis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess and compare the therapeutic outcomes of cutting balloon angioplasty and high-pressure balloon angioplasty for arteriovenous fistula stenosis in hemodialysis patients. All studies indexed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Web of Science were retrieved. The retrieval deadline was July 15, 2023. Risk of bias 2.0 was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Revman 5.4 software was used for data analysis. This review included three studies and 180 patients, with 90 patients in the cutting balloon angioplasty group and 90 patients in the high-pressure balloon angioplasty group. The results of the meta-analysis suggested that compared with high-pressure balloon angioplasty, cutting balloon angioplasty can improve primary lesion patency rates of internal arteriovenous fistulas at 6 months (relative risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.96; P = 0.01). However, there were no significant differences between the technical success rate (relative risk, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05; P = 0.72) and clinical success rate (relative risk, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.07; P = 0.73). Therefore, cutting balloon angioplasty is likely to increase primary lesion patency rates at 6 months. However, more high-quality, large-sample, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation due to the limited number of included studies.

Using root cause analysis as a tool to reduce central venous catheters in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Haemodialysis remains the most common modality of renal replacement therapy. National and international guidelines continue to promote arteriovenous fistulas or grafts as the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis, given the increased risks associated with use of central venous catheters (CVCs). Our renal centre pursues a 'fistula first' culture and uses root cause analysis and a patient safety incident based approach to meet the recommended standards of minimal CVC use in dialysis patients.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective observational review looking at patterns of CVC use amongst our patients to identify themes and changes over time. Using data collected over a 5 year period, we examined 100 patient safety incidents involving CVC use in planned haemodialysis patients. We used a contributory factors framework to identify systemic contributors to each incident.

RESULTS

During the study period our centre achieved the national standard of at least 60% of incident dialysis patients commencing planned haemodialysis via arteriovenous access. About 26% of cases of CVC use in incident dialysis patients were deemed potentially avoidable. The most common contributory factor identified in these cases was poor communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a root cause analysis based methodology to examine CVC use in haemodialysis is a novel approach to quality improvement in this area. Our methodology can be used as a framework by other centres to optimise the provision of safe, effective, and timely vascular access for dialysis, with multiple benefits for both renal services and individual patients.

Hemodialysis vascular access in elderly patients: A comprehensive review

The number of elderly patients initiating hemodialysis (HD) increased considerably over the past decade. Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access (VA) type in most HD patients. Choice of VA for older hemodialysis patients presents a challenge. The higher incidence of comorbidities, longer AVF maturation times, risk of primary failure, risk of patency loss, and shorter life expectancy are important factors to consider. In this review we provide a comprehensive analysis on maturation rates, primary failure, patency, and mortality regarding vascular access in patients older than 75 years of age.

Frailty predicts increased risk of reintervention in the 2 years after arteriovenous fistula creation

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is associated with adverse survival and increased hospital use in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Dialysis access failure is an important source of morbidity and mortality for these patients. There is limited evidence about the interactions between frailty and haemodialysis access failure. This population-based cohort study aimed to determine if haemodialysis access reintervention was predicted by frailty.

METHODS

Routinely-collected hospital data linked with death records were analyzed for all patients with ESKD who had a new arteriovenous fistula or graft (AVF) created between 2010 and 2012 in New South Wales, Australia. Frailty risk was assigned by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazard ratios (HR), adjusted for patient and procedural variables, quantified if frailty was prognostic for adverse haemodialysis access outcomes in the 2 years after AVF creation.

RESULTS

Almost one quarter of the 2302 patients who had a new AVF created during the study period were classified as high frailty risk (554, 24.1%). Compared to low frailty risk patients, patients with high frailty had a significantly greater risk of reintervention for AVF failure in the 2 years after creation (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.45-1.96), adjusted for age, sex and prior AVFs. Frailer patients were also more likely to have perioperative complications, longer hospital length of stay and readmission to hospital. Frailty was associated with a higher risk of mortality at 2 years after AVF creation (adjusted HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.72-4.10).

CONCLUSION

Frailty predicted adverse haemodialysis access outcomes, with frailer patients having higher rates of AVF reinterventions. These results can assist clinicians engaging in shared decision-making discussions about dialysis access risks and help personalize dialysis access decisions.

Vascular access type and mortality in elderly incident hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

The ideal vascular access type for elderly hemodialysis (HD) patients remains debatable. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD and mortality in elderly patients.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study of 99 incident HD patients aged≥80 years from January 2010 to May 2021. Patients were categorized according to their patterns of vascular access use within the first year of HD: central venous catheter (CVC) only, CVC to arteriovenous fistula (AVF), AVF to CVC, and AVF only. Baseline clinical data were compared among groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

When compared with CVC to AVF, mortality risk was significantly higher among CVC only patients and similar to AVF only group [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.32-2.51)]. Ischemic heart disease [HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.02-2.96)], lower levels of albumin [HR 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.64)] and hemoglobin [HR 4.10(95% CI 1.69-9.92)], and higher levels of c-reactive protein [HR 1.87(95% CI 1.11-3.14)] were also associated with increased mortality risk in our cohort, p<0.05.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggested that placement of an AVF during the early stages of dialysis was associated with lower mortality compared to persistent CVC use among elderly patients. AVF placement appears to have a positive impact on survival outcomes, even in those who started dialysis with a CVC.

Evaluation of outcomes with permanent vascular access in an elderly Korean population based on the National Health Insurance Service database

INTRODUCTION

As nearly half of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who initiate hemodialysis (HD) are over 65 years old (commonly defined as elderly), the fistula first strategy is controversial even in HD patients ≥65 years.

METHODS

In Korea's National Health Insurance Service database from 2008 to 2019, 41,989 elderly (≥ 65 years) HD patients were retrospectively reviewed to identify their clinical characteristics and outcomes. Vascular access (VA) patencies, risk factors associated with patencies and patient survival between arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) were compared.

RESULTS

Elderly AVF group (n = 28,467) had superior primary, primary assisted, and secondary patencies than elderly AVG group (n = 13,522) (all p values are <0.001). Patient survival was also better in the elderly AVF group than in the elderly AVG (p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analyses for diverse outcomes, AVG (vs. AVF) was identified as a risk factor for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.307; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.272-1.343; p < 0.001), primary patency (adjusted HR: 1.745; 95% CI: 1.701-1.790; p < 0.001), primary-assisted patency (adjusted HR: 2.163; 95% CI: 2.095-2.233; p < 0.001), and secondary patency (adjusted HR: 3.718; 95% CI: 3.533-3.913; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that as a permanent VA for HD, AVF should be strongly considered in elderly (≥ 65 years) ESKD Korean patients. The age limit for AVF creation in ESKD patients should be adjusted more upward.

Impact of pulmonary hypertension on arteriovenous fistula failure of hemodialysis patients: A 10 years follow-up cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) creation may involve in the pathogenesis of PH. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of PH after AVF creation on the AVF failure rate in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.

METHODS

From January 1, 2009, to January 1, 2019, we retrospectively collected data of 578 MHD patients in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Blood Purification Center, China. Patients were followed-up until AVF failure or death or May 25, 2020. According to the systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) within 1 year after the establishment of AVF, the MHD patients were divided into three groups: SPAP ⩽ 35 mmHg, 35 < SPAP < 45 mmHg, SPAP ⩾ 45 mmHg. The primary outcome was AVF failure defined as AVF cannot complete hemodialysis. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients were analyzed. The average age was 60.66 ± 15.34 years (58.1% men). Of these, 26.1% of patients were reported PH. The SPAP exhibited a left-skewed nonparametric distribution and the overall SPAP after the creation of AVF was 39.00 (29.00-52.00) mmHg. The median follow-up was 5.8 (5.5-6.3) years. Overall, 12.8% (74/578) patients were reported AVF failure events. There was no significant difference in AVF failure rate among three groups (p = 0.070). A total of 111 (19.2%) died during the follow-up period. Compared with the SPAP ⩽35 mmHg group, only the all-cause death rate significantly increased in MHD patients with PH (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The secondary pulmonary hypertension after AVF creation did not increase the risk of AVF failure in MHD patients, but significantly increased the risk of mortality for this portion of the patients. Future larger sample sizes, multi-center, and prospective trials are needed to make sure which type of access will benefit on their survival for MHD patients with SPAP ⩾35 mmHg.

Placement of cuffed tunnelled permanent hemodialysis catheter in patients with end stage renal disease: A cross sectional study

Background

End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is a significantly increasing condition warranting renal replacement therapy. Gaining vascular access for catheter placement for this procedure is of paramount importance. These can be done by temporary and permanent cuffed tunnelled catheters. The present study aims to analyze the outcome of permanent hemodialysis catheters and their efficacy in the case of patients suffering from end-stage renal disease.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 32 patients who underwent permanent tunnelled catheter intervention along with details of follow-up from January 1st, 2021 till December 31st, 2021.

Results

Among 32 patients, the mean age of the patient was 50.25 ± 18.10 years with 62.5% females. The site of insertion was right 27(84.37%) and left internal jugular vein in 4 (12.50%) and 1 patient (3.12%) in the left common femoral vein. Bleeding the peri-catheter site was observed in 4 (12.5%), infection was found among 2 patients (6.25%), thrombosis in the catheter in 7 (21.87%) patients. Indication for the procedure was due to failure of arteriovenous fistula in 21 (65.62%), lack of maturation of the AVF in 9 (28.12%) and patients awaiting transplantation in 2 (6.25%). The mean months of follow-up of the patients were 5.9 months (SD 4.4 months, range 1 month–12 months). Total 25 (78.1%) of the catheters were patent till the time of follow-up. Seven (21.9%) of the patients required manipulation once after which they also had functioning permanent catheters. The mean month on which manipulation was required was 4.1 months (SD 2.3months, range one month to seven months).

Conclusion

Permanent cuffed tunnelled catheter has good patency and can be an alternative to an arteriovenous fistula.

•

Experience of cuffed tunnelled permanent hemodialysis catheter and details on manipulation.

•

Details on denovo catheter insertion and exchange with a previous internal jugular catheter.

•

Study on patency of cuffed tunnelled permanent hemodialysis catheter.

Temporal changes and risk factors for death from early withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation-a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Mortality risk is high soon after dialysis initiation in patients with kidney failure, and dialysis withdrawal is a major cause of early mortality, attributed to psychosocial or medical reasons. The temporal trends and risk factors associated with cause-specific early dialysis withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation remain uncertain.

METHODS

Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we examined the temporal trends and risk factors associated with mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals in incident adult dialysis patients in Australia between 2005 and 2018 using adjusted competing risk analyses.

RESULTS

Of 32 274 incident dialysis patients, 3390 (11%) experienced death within 12 months post-dialysis initiation. Of these, 1225 (36%) were attributed to dialysis withdrawal, with 484 (14%) psychosocial withdrawals and 741 (22%) medical withdrawals. These patterns remained unchanged over the past two decades. Factors associated with increased risk of death from early psychosocial and medical withdrawals were older age, dialysis via central venous catheter, late referral and the presence of cerebrovascular disease; obesity and Asian ethnicity were associated with decreased risk. Risk factors associated with early psychosocial withdrawals were underweight and higher socioeconomic status. Presence of peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease and cancers were associated with early medical withdrawals.

CONCLUSIONS

Death from dialysis withdrawal accounted for >30% of early deaths in kidney failure patients initiated on dialysis and remained unchanged over the past two decades. Several shared risk factors were observed between mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals.

Differential Impact of Central Venous Catheters versus Arteriovenous Fistulae on Quality of Life among Irish Haemodialysis Patients

Background

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) have superior clinical outcomes compared with central venous catheters (CVC) among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Yet, there is increasing recognition that health-related quality of life (HRQoL) may be more important to patients than survival and that differences may exist between AVF and CVCs in this regard. This study compared HRQoL between AVF and CVC in an Irish cohort.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey among prevalent patients undergoing hemodialysis (N=119) dialyzing with either an AVF or CVC at a regional program. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) and a validated Vascular Access Questionnaire (SF-VAQ) compared QoL between AVF and CVC in domains of physical functioning, social functioning, and dialysis complications. Multivariable logistic regression compared differences between groups for outcomes of physical functioning, social functioning, and dialysis complications expressed as adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI.

Results

Mean age was 66.6 years; 52% were using an AVF and 48% had a CVC. Patients dialyzing with an AVF were more satisfied with their access when asked directly (6.2 versus 5.0; P<0.01). Physical functioning scores for bleeding, swelling, and bruising were significantly higher for AVF than CVC (P=0.001, P=0.001, and P<0.001, respectively). In contrast, patients with a CVC reported greater difficulties in bathing and showering than those using an AVF (4.4 versus 2.0; P<0.001), whereas patients with an AVF expressed greater concerns with physical appearances. Compared with AVF, CVC users were less likely to report difficulties in physical functioning (OR=0.35; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.94; P=0.04) but more likely to report dialysis complications (OR=1.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 5.87; P=0.22).

Conclusions

Vascular access contributes to HRQoL in hemodialysis. CVCs are associated with fewer difficulties from bleeding and bruising but greater negative effect on social activities, including bathing and showering. Overall, patients with a CVC had lower dissatisfaction scores than patients with an AVF when all three domains were added. Innovation in vascular access design and engineering may confer benefits and improve patient comfort on HD.

Multidisciplinary care program in pre-end-stage kidney disease from 2010 to 2018 in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The Taiwanese government launched a universal pay-for-performance (P4P) program in 2006 to promote multidisciplinary care for patients with stage 3b-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to understand the enrollments, care processes, and outcomes of the P4P program between 2010 and 2018.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Data. We divided the incident dialysis population into joining and not joining P4P groups based on whether patients had joined the pre-ESRD program before dialysis or not. Trends in the medications prescribed, anemia correction, vascular access preparation before dialysis initiation, and cumulative survival rate were compared.

RESULTS

The program included more than 100,000 patients with late-stage CKD. Enrollment increased by almost 100% from 2010 to 2018, with increases seen in those over 75 years old (127.5%), male (96.7%), and earlier CKD stages (≥35% stage 3b in 2018). Females were more likely to stay being enrolled. The joining P4P group was prescribed more appropriate medications, such as erythropoietin-stimulating agents and statins. However, a high number of patients were still prescribed metformin (≥40%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (≥20%). Compared to the not joining P4P group, the patients in the P4P group had better anemia management, dialysis preparation, and post-dialysis survival.

CONCLUSION

The patients in the joining P4P program group were delivered more appropriate CKD care and were associated with better survival outcomes. Polices and action plans are needed to extend the coverage of and enrollment in the P4P program.

Shared decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a process of collaborative deliberation in the dyadic patient-physician interaction whereby physicians inform the patients about the pros and cons of all available treatment options and reach an agreement with the patients on their preferred treatment plan. In hemodialysis vascular access practice, SDM advocates a deliberative approach based on the existence of reasonable alternatives-that is, arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, and central venous catheter-so that patients are able to form and share preferences about access options. In spite of its ethical imperative, SDM is not broadly applied in hemodialysis vascular access planning. Physicians and surgeons commonly deliver prescriptive fistula-centered recommendations concerning the approach to vascular access care. This paternalistic approach has been shaped by directions from long-held clinical practice guidelines and is reinforced by financial payment models linked with the prevalence of arteriovenous fistula in patients on hemodialysis. Awareness is growing that what may have initially seemed a medically and surgically appropriate approach might not always be focused on each individual's goals of care. Clinician's recommendations for vascular access often do not sufficiently consider the uncertainty surrounding the potential benefits of the decision or the cumulative impact of the decision on patient's quality of life. In the evolving health care landscape, it is time for the practice of hemodialysis vascular access to shift from a hierarchical doctor-patient approach to patient-centered care. In this article we review the current state of vascular access practice, present arguments why SDM is necessary in vascular access planning, review barriers and potential solutions to SDM implementation, and discuss future research contingent on an effective system of physician-patient participative decision-making in hemodialysis vascular access practice.

Management of Kidney Failure in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: What Are the Best Options?

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most frequent cause of kidney failure (KF). There are large variations in the incidence rates of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Late referral to nephrology services has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In many countries, when patients reach severely reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR), they are managed by multidisciplinary teams led by nephrologists. In these clinics, efforts will continue to halt chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and to prevent cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In patients with diabetes and severely reduced GFR and KF, treating hyperglycemia is a challenge, since some drugs are contraindicated and most of them require dose adjustments. Even more, a decision-making process will help in deciding whether the patient would prefer comprehensive conservative care or KRT. On many occasions, this decision will be conditioned by diabetes mellitus itself. Effective education should cover the necessary information for the patient and family to answer these questions: 1. Should I go for KRT or not? 2. If the answer is KRT, dialysis and/or transplantation? 3. Dialysis at home or in center? 4. If dialysis at home, peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis? 5. If transplantation is desired, discuss the options of whether the donation would be from a living or deceased donor. This review addresses the determinant factors with an impact on DKD, aiming to shed light on the specific needs that arise in the management and recommendations on how to achieve a comprehensive approach to the diabetic patient with chronic kidney disease.

Endovascular arteriovenous fistulas- are they the answer we haven't been looking for?

INTRODUCTION

Surgically created arteriovenous fistulas are the accepted gold standard for the establishment of hemodialysis access in patients requiring dialysis. However, primary and maturation failures may limit their usage. Recent advances in endovascular technology have resulted in the creation of devices for endovascular arteriovenous fistula formation. These devices may offer an additional or alternative approach to fistula formation in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the limitations of surgical arteriovenous fistulas and the endovascular devices currently available. The review covers initial trial data and subsequent studies examining their use.

EXPERT OPINION

Early results achieved with endovascular fistula formation are encouraging. Current limitations of this technology include anatomic suitability and a high rate of re-interventions required to establish maturity. Greater uptake of the technology will also require a review of long-term outcomes in larger patient cohorts.

Arteriovenous Fistula Placement, Maturation, and Patency Loss in Older Patients Initiating Hemodialysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The current clinical guidelines for vascular access do not have specific recommendations for older hemodialysis patients. Our study aimed to determine the association of age with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) placement, maturation, and primary and secondary patency loss among older hemodialysis recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

A US national cohort of incident hemodialysis patients 67 years or older (N = 43,851) assembled from the US Renal Data System.

EXPOSURE

Age at dialysis initiation.

OUTCOMES

AVF placement, maturation, primary patency loss, and abandonment.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cause-specific and subdistribution proportional hazards models were used to examine the association of age and AVF outcomes, with kidney transplantation, peritoneal dialysis, and death treated as competing events. Age cutoff was identified by restricted cubic splines. We compared crude and inverse probability-weighted cumulative incidence functions using Gray's test.

RESULTS

As compared with those aged 67-<77 years, patients 77 years or older had significantly lower probabilities of AVF placement (adjusted cause-specific HR [cHR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-0.99]; adjusted subdistribution HR [sHR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.89-0.95]; Gray's test P < 0.001) and maturation (adjusted cHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]; adjusted sHR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.90-0.97]; P < 0.001). However, age was not associated with AVF primary (adjusted cHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.00-1.11]; adjusted sHR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.99-1.09]; P = 0.09) or secondary (adjusted cHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.94-1.20]; adjusted sHR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.93-1.18]; P = 0.4) patency loss.

LIMITATIONS

Reliance on administrative claims to ascertain AVF outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of AVF maturation is an important consideration for vascular access planning. Age alone should not be the basis for excluding older dialysis patients from AVF creation because maintenance of fistula patency was not reduced with older age despite a modest reduction in fistula maturation.

Vascular access type and mortality in haemodialysis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Haemodialysis patients have a high mortality rate. Part of this can be attributed to vascular access complications. Large retrospective studies have shown a higher mortality in patients dialysed with a catheter, which is mostly ascribed to infectious complications. Since we observe very little infectious complications in our haemodialysis patients, the aim of our study was to assess if we could still detect a difference in survival according to vascular access type.

Methods

Patients that started chronic haemodialysis treatment between 1/1/2007 and 31/12/2016 at the ‘Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel’ were retrospectively studied. The time to death was studied as a function of the two main vascular access types using survival analysis, considering the type of vascular access at the initiation of dialysis or as time varying, and accounting for the available baseline characteristics.

Results

Of 374 patients 309 (82.6%) initiated haemodialysis with a catheter, while 65 patients initiated with an arteriovenous access. Vascular access type during follow-up did not change in 74% of all patients. A Kaplan Meier plot did not suggest a survival dependent on the vascular access type at start. An extended cox proportional hazard analysis showed that vascular access type was not independently correlated with mortality. However, age, history of congestive heart failure and active cancer at initiation of dialysis were independently associated with mortality.

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort study, haemodialysis vascular access type was not independently correlated with patient survival, even after taking into account change of vascular access over time.

Non-invasive tunnelled catheter reposition (NTCR): A simple and safe method to restore central tunnelled catheter function for haemodialysis

Despite all efforts, still many end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are dialysed using a central tunnelled catheter (CTC) as vascular access. When the CTC blood flow becomes ineffective, a number of protocols are advised. However, all of them are time- and cost-consuming. The manoeuvre of a non-invasive tunnelled catheter reposition (NTCR) was introduced to restore the CTC function. NTCR was based on gentle movements of the CTC, with or without a simultaneous flushing of the CTC lines, which resulted in a quick reposition of the CTC tip. This study comprises the analysis of a total of 297 NTCRs, which were performed in 114 patients, thus enabling an effective blood flow after 133 procedures (44.7%).Partially effective blood flow followed 123 procedures (41.4%), and it failed altogether in 41 cases (13.9%). Overall, 86% of conducted NTCRs improved the CTC patency to perform a haemodialysis session. The procedure could be successfully repeated, with a similar result after the first and the second attempt. Complications were observed only after 3.4% of all interventions. The novel NTCR manoeuvre was safe and effective in the majority of the CTC dysfunction episodes. It seemed to reduce fibrinolytic usage, allowed an immediate haemodialysis session commencement, therefore, it might save both the costs and the nursing staff time.

Comparison of vascular access patency and patient survival between native arteriovenous fistula and synthetic arteriovenous graft according to age group

INTRODUCTION

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is historically known to be the ideal option for vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis compared with arteriovenous graft (AVG). However, this approach has been recently questioned in the aging population because of their poor vessel quality and multiple comorbidities.

METHODS

Data from a total of 2200 patients from the VA category of The Catholic Medical Center nephrology registry from March 2009 to February 2017 were analyzed. We compared VA patency and patient survival between two groups, AVF and AVG, according to age.

FINDINGS

Compared with the AVG group, survival benefit in the AVF group continued even in patients ≥80 years. In the whole population, all the primary patency (PP), primary-assisted patency (PAP), and secondary patency (SP) measures were superior in the AVF group. With regard to subgroups, PP was comparable between the two groups in patients ≥65 years, whereas PAP and SP were superior in the AVF group even in septuagenarian patients who are from 70 to 79 years old. In patients ≥80 years, all the patency measures were comparable between the two groups. When the separate comparison of lower-arm AVF (or upper-arm AVF) and AVG, lower-arm AVF failed to demonstrate its superiority in any kind of patency in septuagenarian patients compared with AVG, whereas upper-arm AVF demonstrated its superiority in PAP and SP in septuagenarian patients. However, even upper-arm AVF failed to demonstrate its superiority in any kind of patency in patients ≥80 years.

DISCUSSION

Arteriovenous fistula if using upper-arm vessel showed the superior VA patency up to septuagenarian patients, whereas, in HD patients ≥80 years, AVF and AVG were comparable in VA patency.

Vascular Access and Risk of Bloodstream Infection Among Older Incident Hemodialysis Patients

Rationale & Objective

Most new patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) initiate hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC) and later transition to a permanent vascular access with lower infection risk. The benefit of early fistula use in preventing severe infections is incompletely understood. We examined patients' first access and subsequent transitions between accesses during the first year of HD to estimate the risk for bloodstream infection (BSI) associated with incident and time-dependent use of HD access.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study using enhanced 5% Medicare claims data.

Setting & Participants

New patients with ESRD initiating HD between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012, and having complete pre-ESRD Medicare fee-for-service coverage for 2 years.

Exposure

The incident and prevalent use of CVC, graft, or fistula as determined from monthly reports to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services by HD providers.

Outcome

Incident hospitalization with a primary/secondary diagnosis of BSI (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 038.xx or 790.7).

Analytical Approach

Extended survival analysis accounting for patient confounders.

Results

Of 2,352 study participants, 1,870 (79.5%), 77 (3.3%), and 405 (17.2%) initiated HD with a CVC, graft, and fistula, respectively. During the first year, the incident BSI hospitalization rates per 1,000 person-days were 1.3, 0.8, and 0.3 (P<0.001) in patients initiating with a CVC, graft, and fistula, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, incident fistula use was associated with 61% lower risk for BSI (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.54; P<0.001) compared with incident CVC or graft use. The prevalent fistula or graft use was associated with lower risk for BSI compared with prevalent CVC use (HRs of 0.30 [95% CI, 0.22-0.42] and 0.47 [95% CI, 0.31-0.73], respectively).

Limitations

Restricted to an elderly population; potential residual confounding.

Conclusions

Incident fistula use was associated with lowest rates of BSI, but the majority of beneficiaries with pre-ESRD insurance initiated HD with a CVC. Strategies are needed to improve pre-ESRD fistula placement.

Incremental hemodialysis, a valuable option for the frail elderly patient

Management of older people on dialysis requires focus on the wider aspects of aging as well as dialysis. Recognition and assessment of frailty is vital in changing our approach in elderly patients. Current guidelines in dialysis have a limited evidence base across all age group, but particularly the elderly. We need to focus on new priorities of care when we design guidelines "for people not diseases". Patient-centered goal-directed therapy, arising from shared decision-making between physician and patient, should allow adaption of the dialysis regime. Hemodialysis (HD) in the older age group can be complicated by intradialytic hypotension, prolonged time to recovery, and access-related problems. There is increasing evidence relating to the harm associated with the delivery of standard thrice-weekly HD. Incremental HD has a lower burden of treatment. There appears to be no adverse clinical effects during the first years of dialysis in presence of a significant residual kidney function. The advantages of incremental HD might be particularly important for elderly patients with short life expectancy. There is a need for more research into specific topics such as the assessment of the course of frailty with progression of chronic kidney disease and after dialysis initiation, the choice of dialysis modality impacting on the trajectory of frailty, the timing of dialysis initiation impacting on frailty or on other outcomes. In conclusion, understanding each individual's goals of care in the context of his or her life experience is particularly important in the elderly, when overall life expectancy is relatively short, and life experience or quality of life may be the priority.