SNO and EANO practice guideline update: Anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors

Neuro-oncologic Emergencies

OBJECTIVE

Neuro-oncologic emergencies have become more frequent as cancer remains one of the leading causes of death in the United States, second only to heart disease. This article highlights key aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute neurologic complications in primary central nervous system malignancies and systemic cancer, following three thematic classifications: (1) complications that are anatomically or intrinsically tumor-related, (2) complications that are tumor-mediated, and (3) complications that are treatment-related.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The main driver of mortality in patients with brain metastasis is systemic disease progression; however, intracranial hypertension, treatment-resistant seizures, and overall decline due to increased intracranial burden of disease are the main factors underlying neurologic-related deaths. Advances in the understanding of tumor-specific characteristics can better inform risk stratification of neurologic complications. Following standardized grading and management algorithms for neurotoxic syndromes related to newer immunologic therapies is paramount to achieving favorable outcomes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Neuro-oncologic emergencies span the boundaries of subspecialties in neurology and require a broad understanding of neuroimmunology, neuronal hyperexcitability, CSF flow dynamics, intracranial compliance, and neuroanatomy.

Optimizing perampanel monotherapy for surgically resected brain tumors

Perampanel (PER) is an antiseizure medication (ASM) with a unique mechanism of action, which was approved in Japan for use in combination therapy in 2016 and as a monotherapy in 2020. It has exerted antitumor effects against several types of tumors in vitro. However, the efficacy of PER monotherapy for seizure control is not well-established in patients with brain tumor. In the present study, 25 patients with brain tumor treated using PER monotherapy at our institution were analyzed and compared with 45 patients treated using the most commonly prescribed ASM, levetiracetam (LEV). The PER group was younger and had a higher frequency of glioma cases. During drug administration, seizures were observed in two patients from the PER group (8.0%) and five patients from the LEV group (11.1%); however, the difference was not significant. The incidence of adverse effects did not significantly differ between the groups (12.0 and 2.2%, respectively). In the PER group, mild liver dysfunction was observed in two patients and drug rash in one. In the LEV group, a drug-induced rash was observed in one patient. PER monotherapy may be safe and effective for seizure treatment or prophylaxis in patients with brain tumor. Further large-scale clinical studies are warranted.

Association of Clinical, Tumor, and Treatment Characteristics With Seizure Control in Patients With IDH1/2-Mutant Lower-Grade Glioma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with IDH1/2-mutant lower-grade glioma have a high frequency of seizures. We aimed to investigate the correlations between seizures and tumor/patient characteristics and the impact of surgery and adjuvant treatments (AT) on seizure control along the disease trajectory.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with IDH1/2-mutant lower-grade glioma who underwent surgery at the neurosurgery divisions of the University of Turin and Milan and were treated at the Division of Neuro-Oncology of Turin. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis according to the 2021 WHO Classification and presentation with seizures; exclusion criteria were presence of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, intense/ring contrast enhancement on MRI at presentation, and small tissue biopsy. We evaluated seizure freedom for 2 months after surgery, 6 months from starting observation or AT, at recurrence, and for 6 months after treatments of recurrence.

RESULTS

We included 150 patients. There were 77 (51%) and 31 (21%) patients with IDH-mutant/1p19q-codeleted grade 2 and 3 oligodendroglioma and 30 (20%) and 12 (8%) with IDH-mutant grade 2 and 3 astrocytoma, respectively. Total resection was accomplished in 68 (45%). Seventy-five patients (50%) received AT while the remaining 75 were observed with MRI. After 6 months after AT, 28 of 29 patients (96.5%) displayed seizure reduction, 5 of 28 (18%) being seizure-free. 66 of 124 patients (53%) had seizures at recurrence. After 6 months after second-line treatments, 60 of 66 patients (91%) had seizure reduction, 11 (17%) being seizure-free. In multivariable analyses, grade 3 histology positively correlated with seizure freedom at 2 months after surgery (OR 3.5, 1.4-8.9, p = 0.008), 6 months after AT (OR 9.0, 1.5-54.9, p = 0.017), and 6 months after treatment of recurrence (OR 4.9, 1.5-16.5, p = 0.009). Adjuvant radiotherapy reduced seizures at recurrence in a univariate analysis (OR 0.14, 0.03-0.7, p = 0.020). Patients with seizure freedom after surgery and AT displayed longer progression-free survival (PFS) (65, 24.5-105, vs 48 months, 32-63.5, p = 0.037).

DISCUSSION

This study analyzed seizure control in patients with IDH1/2-mutant lower-grade glioma across multiple time points. Grade 3 correlated with better seizure control throughout the entire disease trajectory, and seizure freedom after surgery and AT correlated with a longer PFS regardless of tumor grade. These results could serve as an external control arm in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy on seizures of antitumor agents in patients with IDH-mutant lower-grade glioma.

Glioblastoma in the oldest old: Clinical characteristics, therapy, and outcome in patients aged 80 years and older

Background

Incidence rates of glioblastoma in very old patients are rising. The standard of care for this cohort is only partially defined and survival remains poor. The aims of this study were to reveal current practice of tumor-specific therapy and supportive care, and to identify predictors for survival in this cohort.

Methods

Patients aged 80 years or older at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis were retrospectively identified in 6 clinical centers in Switzerland and France. Demographics, clinical parameters, and survival outcomes were annotated from patient charts. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to identify parameters associated with survival.

Results

Of 107 patients, 45 were diagnosed by biopsy, 30 underwent subtotal resection, and 25 had gross total resection. In 7 patients, the extent of resection was not specified. Postoperatively, 34 patients did not receive further tumor-specific treatment. Twelve patients received radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide, but only 2 patients had maintenance temozolomide therapy. Fourteen patients received temozolomide alone, 35 patients received radiotherapy alone, 1 patient received bevacizumab, and 1 took part in a clinical trial. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.2 months. Among patients who received any postoperative treatment, median PFS was 3.9 months and median OS was 7.2 months. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70%, gross total resection, and combination therapy were associated with better outcomes. The median time spent hospitalized was 30 days, accounting for 23% of the median OS. End-of-life care was mostly provided by nursing homes (n = 20; 32%) and palliative care wards (n = 16; 26%).

Conclusions

In this cohort of very old patients diagnosed with glioblastoma, a large proportion was treated with best supportive care. Treatment beyond surgery and, in particular, combined modality treatment were associated with longer OS and may be considered for selected patients even at higher ages.

The Prevalence of Seizures in Brain Metastasis Patients on Anticonvulsant Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BM) prognosis is incredibly poor and is often associated with considerable morbidity. Seizures are commonly present in these patients, and their biopsychosocial impact can be dangerous. The use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as primary prophylaxis remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy of AED prophylaxis in patients with BM.

METHODS

MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched for articles pertinent to AED prophylaxis use in patients with BM. Patients with BM previously treated for cancer who were seizure naive at the time of inclusion were included. Data regarding patient characteristics, type of AED, prior treatments, and groups at a high risk of seizure were extracted. Seizure prevalence was obtained.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis; 1902 total patients with BM were included, with 381 receiving antiepileptic prophylaxis, and 1521 receiving no prophylaxis. Although the odds of a seizure in the treatment group was found to be 1.158 times the odds of a seizure in the control group, the odds ratio was not statistically significant (t-statistic = 0.62, P value = 0.5543).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the odds of seizure development in control groups compared to patients receiving prophylactic antiepileptic therapy. As patients with BM present with heterogeneity in tumor characteristics and receive various treatment modalities, future research is needed to identify groups that may benefit more significantly from AED prophylaxis.

Antiepileptic Strategies for Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Seizure activity is common in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors, affecting more than 50% of cases over the course of their disease. Several mechanisms contribute to brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), including a pro-inflammatory environment, excessive secretion of glutamate and an increase in neuronal excitatory tone, reduction of GABAergic inhibitory activity, and an increase in 2-hydroxygluturate production in isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant tumors. After a verified seizure in a brain tumor patient, the consensus is that BTRE has developed, and it is necessary to initiate an antiepileptic drug (AED). It is not recommended to initiate AED prophylaxis. Second- and third-generation AEDs are the preferred options for initiation, due to a lack of hepatic enzyme induction and reduced likelihood for drug-drug interactions, especially in regard to neoplastic treatment. The efficacy of appropriate AEDs for patients with BTRE is fairly equivalent, although some data suggests that levetiracetam may be slightly more active in suppressing seizures than other AEDs. The consensus among most Neuro-Oncology providers is to initiate levetiracetam monotherapy after a first seizure in a brain tumor patient, as long as the patient does not have any psychiatric co-morbidities. If levetiracetam is not tolerated well or is ineffective, other appropriate initial AED options for monotherapy or as an add-on anticonvulsant include lacosamide, valproic acid, briviracetam, lamotrigine, and perampanel.

Discontinuation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Tumors

Patients with brain tumors will experience seizures during their disease course. While providers can use antiseizure medications to control these events, patients with brain tumors can experience side effects, ranging from mild to severe, from these medications. Providers in subspecialties such as neurology, neuro-oncology, neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology often work with patients with brain tumor to balance seizure control and the adverse toxicity of antiseizure medications. In this study, we sought to explore the problem of brain tumor-related seizures/epilepsy in the context of how and when to consider antiseizure medication discontinuation. Moreover, we thoroughly evaluate the literature on antiseizure medication discontinuation for adult and pediatric patients and highlight recommendations relevant to patients with both brain tumors and seizures.

Intravenous tranexamic acid for intracerebral meningioma resections: A randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic that is widely used to reduce surgical bleeding. However, TXA occasionally causes seizures and the risk might be especially great after neurosurgery. We therefore tested the hypothesis that TXA does not meaningfully increase the risk of postoperative seizures within 7 days after intracranial tumor resections.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University.

PATIENTS

600 patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection were included from October 2020 to August 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to a single dose of 20 mg/kg of TXA after induction (n = 300) or to the same volume of normal saline (n = 300).

MEASUREMENT

The primary outcome was postoperative seizures occurring within 7 days after surgery, analyzed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Non-inferiority was defined by an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the absolute difference being <5.5%. Secondary outcomes included incidence of non-epileptic complication within 7 days, changes in hemoglobin concentration, estimated intraoperative blood loss. Post hoc analyses included the types and timing of seizures, oozing assessment, and a sensitivity analysis for the primary outcome in patients with pathologic diagnosis of meningioma.

MAIN RESULTS

All 600 enrolled patients adhered to the protocol and completed the follow-up for the primary outcome. Postoperative seizures occurred in 11 of 300 (3.7%) of patients randomized to normal saline and 13 of 300 (4.3%) patients assigned to tranexamic acid (mean risk difference, 0.7%; 1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 4.3%; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). No significant differences were observed in any secondary outcome. Post hoc analysis indicated similar amounts of oozing, calculated blood loss, recurrent seizures, and timing of seizures.

CONCLUSION

Among patients having supratentorial meningioma resection, a single intraoperative dose of TXA did not significantly reduce bleeding and was non-inferior with respect to postoperative seizures after surgery.

REGISTRY INFORMATION

This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04595786) on October 22, 2020, by Dr.Yuming Peng.

Management of Neurologic Complications in Patients with Brain and Spine Tumors

Patients with brain and spine tumors represent a distinct population with unique needs. We provide a practical review of neurologic care in this group with an emphasis on familiarizing the general neurologist to the nuances of neuro-oncologic supportive care. We review the management of cerebral edema, steroid dosing, and pertinent side effects. We discuss seizure management, including choice of anticonvulsants, putative antitumor effects, and important seizure mimics like drop attacks. We review the presentation and symptomatology of stroke-like migraine attack after radiation therapy (SMART syndrome). We describe the signs and symptoms that should prompt concern for metastatic spinal cord compression, as well as both acute and definitive treatment options. Finally, we discuss the underappreciated incidence of venous thromboembolic events, particularly in patients with gliomas, and review the data on management.

Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management

Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.

Patterns of Antiseizure Medication Use Following Meningioma Resection: A Single-Institution Experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate antiseizure medication (ASM) practice behavior for patients who present with seizures before meningioma resection and to review postoperative ASM management.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of 112 consecutive patients with meningiomas who underwent resection at a single institution between October 2016 and January 2020. Data were collected through detailed chart review.

RESULTS

Of 112 patients, 35 (31%) had a preoperative seizure, and 43 (38%) were prescribed a preoperative ASM. At discharge, 96 patients (86%) were prescribed an ASM, most often 1000 mg daily of levetiracetam (64%, 61/96) and less often higher doses of levetiracetam or other ASMs. By the 6-month postoperative visit, 55 patients (49%) were taking at least 1 ASM, most commonly levetiracetam monotherapy (65%) at 500 mg twice daily (47%). This number further decreased to 45 (40%) patients by 1-year follow-up and 36 (32%) patients by last-known follow-up. By last follow-up (median 27.3 months; range 5.4-57.4 months), 24 patients (21%) had experienced a postoperative seizure, and 36 patients (32%) were never able to discontinue ASMs. Of patients remaining on levetiracetam monotherapy, only 36% remained on levetiracetam 500 mg twice daily.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately two thirds (68%) of patients who underwent surgical resection of meningioma were eventually able to completely discontinue their postoperative ASM regimen. However, nearly one third (32%) of patients required long-term ASM management. Levetiracetam monotherapy was the most common ASM prescribed during the postoperative period, and the proportion of patients requiring either higher doses of levetiracetam or alternative ASMs increased over time.

Management of Complications in Neuro-oncology Patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with the spectrum of neurologic and medical complications relevant to the care of patients with neurologic cancer while highlighting best practices to prevent morbidity and mortality. Topics include tumor-related epilepsy, vasogenic edema, complications of corticosteroid use, disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, venous thromboembolism, and opportunistic infection.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

In 2021, a joint guideline from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology reaffirmed recommendations first established in 2000 that patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors should not be prescribed an antiseizure medication prophylactically. For those with tumor-related epilepsy, monotherapy with a non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant is the preferred initial treatment, and levetiracetam remains the preferred first choice. Surveys of physician practice continue to demonstrate excessive use of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with both primary and metastatic central nervous system malignancy. This is particularly concerning among patients who require checkpoint inhibitors as the efficacy of these agents is blunted by concomitant glucocorticoid use, resulting in a reduction in overall survival. Finally, direct oral anticoagulants have been shown to be safe in patients with brain tumors and are now favored as first-line treatment among those who require treatment for venous thromboembolism.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Medical care for patients impacted by primary and secondary central nervous system malignancy is complex and requires a committed team-based approach that routinely calls upon the expertise of physicians across multiple fields. Neurologists have an important role to play and should be familiar with the spectrum of complications impacting these patients as well as the latest recommendations for management.

Epileptic seizures in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) accounts for less than 5% of primary brain tumors. Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of brain tumors; however, literature on the prevalence, characteristics, and oncological implications of seizures in patients with PCNSL is limited, and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is unclear. This review aimed to summarize the existing knowledge on seizures in PCNSL, their potential association with surgery, oncological treatment, survival rates, and management of AEDs.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA recommendations and included articles published between 1953 and 2023 describing seizures in patients with PCNSL.

RESULTS

The search identified 282 studies, of which 21 were included. Up to 33% of patients with PCNSL developed seizures, mostly at the initial presentation. Little information was found on changes in seizure incidence through the course of the disease, and no details were found on seizure frequency, the percentage of treatment-resistant patients, or the evolution of seizures at remission. Younger age, cortical location, and immunodeficiency have been identified as potential risk factors for seizures, but evidence is very limited. The growing use of vigorous treatments including intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation and immunotherapy with CAR-T cells is associated with a higher incidence of seizures. The association between seizure development and patient mortality in PCNSL remains unknown. There are no data on AED prophylaxis or the use of specific AEDs in PCNSL.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to investigate seizures in larger cohorts of PCNSL, to clarify their prevalence, better characterize them, identify risk factors, analyze survival rates, and make recommendations on AED management. We recommend following general practice guidelines for seizures symptomatic of brain tumors and not to prescribe AED prophylaxis in PCNSL.

Adult-type Diffuse Gliomas

OBJECTIVE

This article highlights key aspects of the diagnosis and management of adult-type diffuse gliomas, including glioblastomas and IDH-mutant gliomas relevant to the daily practice of the general neurologist.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The advances in molecular characterization of gliomas have translated into more accurate prognostication and tumor classification. Gliomas previously categorized by histological appearance solely as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas are now also defined by molecular features. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials have incorporated these advances to tailor more effective treatments for specific glioma subtypes.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Despite recent insights into the molecular aspects of gliomas, these tumors remain incurable. Care for patients with these complex tumors requires a multidisciplinary team in which the general neurologist has an important role. Efforts focus on translating the latest data into more effective therapies that can prolong survival.

Susceptibility to preoperative seizures in glioma patients with elevated homocysteine levels

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are a common clinical presentation in patients with glioma and substantially impact patients' quality of life. Hyperhomocysteinemia is defined as abnormally high serum levels of homocysteine (Hcy) and is reportedly linked to susceptibility to various nervous system diseases. However, it remains unclear whether and how hyperhomocysteinemia and its associated genetic polymorphisms promote seizures in glioma patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all medical data from 127 patients with malignant gliomas, who underwent initial tumor resection by our team between July 2019 and June 2021 and had preoperative measurements of serum Hcy levels. According to whether they had at least one seizure before surgery, they were divided into the seizure and nonseizure groups. We also detected polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and measured intratumoral Hcy levels in these patients.

RESULTS

Hyperhomocysteinemia was a susceptibility factor for preoperative seizures in glioma patients according to both univariate analyses (P < 0.001) and multivariate logistic regression analyses (OR 1.239, 95% CI 1.062-1.445, P = 0.007). Patients with the MTHFR C677T variant exhibited elevated serum Hcy levels (P = 0.027) and an increased prevalence of preoperative seizures (P = 0.019). Intratumoral Hcy levels were positively correlated with serum Hcy levels (R = 0.231, P = 0.046) and were elevated in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia (P = 0.031), the MTHFR C677T variant (P = 0.002) and preoperative seizures (P = 0.003). High intratumoral Hcy levels, rather than hyperhomocysteinemia or the MTHFR C677T variant, emerged as an independent risk factor for preoperative seizures (OR 1.303, 95% CI 1.015-1.673, P = 0.038). Furthermore, the effects of hyperhomocysteinemia on epileptic susceptibility were reduced to nonsignificance when intratumoral Hcy was controlled to the same level between groups.

SIGNIFICANCE

Glioma patients with hyperhomocysteinemia and the MTHFR C677T variant were susceptible to preoperative seizures, suggesting their potential as biomarkers for the management of seizures in glioma patients. The elevation of intratumoral Hcy is a possible mechanism underlying this susceptibility.

Brain Metastases and Leptomeningeal Disease

OBJECTIVE

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases include brain parenchymal, spinal cord, and leptomeningeal metastases. This article discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic advances of the last decade that have improved outcomes for patients with these CNS metastases.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

The diagnostic tools for CNS metastases, particularly leptomeningeal disease, have evolved over the past decade with respect to advancements in CSF analysis. Multiple medical therapies are now available for brain metastasis treatment that have shown CNS efficacy, including targeted therapies and antibody-drug conjugates. Molecular testing for CNS metastases has become more common and the repertoire of molecularly targeted therapies continues to expand. Advancements in radiation therapy, including improvements in stereotactic radiation techniques, whole-brain radiation with hippocampal avoidance, and proton beam radiation, have changed the radiation management of patients with CNS metastases. New intrathecal agents are currently being tested for the management of leptomeningeal metastases.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

CNS metastases are far more common than primary brain tumors and are increasing in prevalence in the setting of improved treatments and prolonged survival in patients with systemic cancers. There have been many changes in the diagnostics and treatment of CNS metastases, yielding subsequent improvements in patient outcomes with further advancements on the horizon.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

Influencing Factors and Nomogram for the Development of Epilepsy in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a prevalent comorbidity in patients with brain metastases (BM) and could result in sudden and accidental damage, as well as increased disease burden due to its rapid onset. Foreseeing the potential for the development of epilepsy may permit timely and efficient measures. This study aimed to analyze the influencing factors of epilepsy in advanced lung cancer (ALC) patients with BM and construct a nomogram model to predict the likelihood of developing epilepsy.

METHODS

Socio-demographic and clinical data of ALC patients with BM were retrospectively collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between September 2019 and June 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to determine the influencing factors for epilepsy in ALC patients with BM. Based on the results of the logistic regression analysis, a nomogram was built to represent the contribution of each influencing factor in predicting the probability of epilepsy development in ALC patients with BM. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were utilized to evaluate the goodness of fit and prediction performance of the model.

RESULTS

The incidence of epilepsy among 138 ALC patients with BM was 29.7%. On the multivariate analysis, having a higher number of supratentorial lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 1.727; p = 0.022), hemorrhagic foci (OR = 4.922; p = .021), and a high-grade of peritumoral edema (OR = 2.524; p < .001) were independent risk factors for developing epilepsy, while undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (OR = .327; p = .019) was an independent protective factor. The p-value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was .535 and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was .852 (95% CI: .807-.897), suggesting the model had a good fit and exhibited strong predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram was constructed that can predict the probability of epilepsy development for ALC patients with BM, which is helpful for healthcare professionals to identify high-risk groups early and allows for individualized interventions.

ESMO/ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2023

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and ASCO are publishing a new edition of the ESMO/ASCO Global Curriculum (GC) with contributions from more than 150 authors. The purpose of the GC is to provide recommendations for the training of physicians in medical oncology and to establish a set of educational standards for trainees to qualify as medical oncologists. This edition builds on prior ones in 2004, 2010, and 2016 and incorporates scientific advances and input from an ESMO ASCO survey on GC adoption conducted in 2019, which revealed that GC has been adopted or adapted in as many as two thirds of the countries surveyed. To make GC even more useful and applicable, certain subchapters were rearranged into stand-alone chapters, that is, cancer epidemiology, diagnostics, and research. In line with recent progress in the field of multidisciplinary cancer care new (sub)chapters, such as image-guided therapy, cell-based therapy, and nutritional support, were added. Moreover, this edition includes an entirely new chapter dedicated to cancer control principles, aiming to ensure that medical oncologists are able to identify and implement sustainable and equitable cancer care, tailored to local needs and resources. Besides content renewal, modern didactic principles were introduced. GC content is presented using two chapter templates (cancer-specific and non-cancer-specific), with three didactic points (objectives, key concepts, and skills). The next step is promoting GC as a contemporary and comprehensive document applicable all over the world, particularly due to its capacity to harmonize education in medical oncology and, in so doing, help to reduce global disparities in cancer care.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for high-grade gliomas of adulthood (2022)

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are the most common primary brain malignancies and account for more than half of all malignant primary brain tumors. The new 2021 WHO classification divides adult HGG into four subtypes: grade 3 oligodendroglioma (1p/19 codeleted, IDH-mutant); grade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytoma; grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and grade 4 IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GB). Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CTX) are the current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Several clinically relevant molecular markers that assist in diagnosis and prognosis have recently been identified. The treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is not well defined and decision-making is usually based on prior strategies, as well as several clinical and radiological factors. Whereas the prognosis for GB is grim (5-year survival rate of 5-10%) outcomes for the other high-grade gliomas are typically better, depending on the molecular features of the tumor. The presence of neurological deficits and seizures can significantly impact quality of life.

Intracranial intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT): evaluation of electrocorticography and peri-operative seizure risk

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) for brain metastases (BMs) and primary brain tumors has emerged as an adjuvant radiation modality that allows for consolidation of care into a single anesthetic episode with surgical resection. Yet, there is a paucity of data regarding the impact that IORT may have on peri-operative and long-term seizure risk.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients receiving IORT during tumor resection was performed via registry including data regarding peri-operative anti-seizure medications and anesthetic agents. Intra-operative neuromonitoring was performed using electrocorticography (ECoG) captured before-, during-, and after-IORT then analyzed for evidence of seizure or significant baseline changes. Kaplan-Meir estimations were used for overall survival analysis relative to documented clinical seizure incidence post-IORT.

RESULTS

Of the 24 consecutive patients treated with IORT during tumor resection included, 18 (75%) patients were diagnosed with BMs while 6 (25%) had newly-diagnosed glioblastoma. Mean and median survival times were 487 and 372 days, respectively. Clinical seizures occurred in 3 patients post-IORT, 2 BMs patients within 9 months and 1 glioblastoma patient at 14 months. IORT time represented 9.5% of anesthetic time. ECoG recordings were available for 5 patients (4 BMs; 1 glioblastoma), with mean recording durations of 13% of the total anesthetic time and no evidence of high-frequency oscillations or seizure activity.

CONCLUSIONS

IORT is an option for delivery of definitive radiation in surgically resected brain tumors without increasing the peri-operative or long-term risk of seizure. ECoG data during the delivery of radiation fail to demonstrate any electrophysiological changes in response to ionizing radiation.

Perioperative perampanel administration for early seizure prophylaxis in brain tumor patients

Background

The efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy in "seizure-naïve" patients with brain tumor, including glioblastoma (GBM), remains controversial. This study investigated whether perampanel (PER) is effective and safe for preventing perioperative onset of epileptic seizures, so-called early seizure, in patients with brain tumors.

Methods

Forty-five patients underwent tumor resection through craniotomy for a primary supratentorial brain tumor at Ehime University Hospital between April 2021 and July 2022. PER was administered from the 1st to the 6th day after surgery for seizure prophylaxis. Occurrence of early seizure, hematological toxicities, and various side effects were recorded on postoperative days 7 and 14. In addition, the clinical course of these patients was compared with 42 brain tumor patients under the same treatment protocol who received levetiracetam (LEV) for seizure prophylaxis between April 2017 and October 2018.

Results

In 45 patients with brain tumor, including GBM, who received PER administration, no early seizures were identified within 7 days postoperatively. No adverse drug reactions such as hematological toxicity, liver or kidney dysfunction, or exanthematous drug eruption were observed in any cases. As side effects, somnolence was reported in 14 patients (31.1%), vertigo in 3 patients (6.7%), and headache in 3 patients (6.7%). Although somnolence and vertigo were difficult to assess in the case of intraparenchymal tumors, particularly GBM, these side effects were not identified in patients with extraparenchymal tumors such as meningiomas, epidermoid cysts, and pituitary adenomas. In addition, no significant differences were identified compared to patients who received LEV.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of PER in preventing early seizures among patients with brain tumors were retrospectively evaluated. Perioperative administration of PER to patients with brain tumors may reduce the risk of early seizures without incurring serious side effects, showing no significant differences compared to patients who received LEV.

Diagnosis and management of complications from the treatment of primary central nervous system tumors in adults

Central nervous system (CNS) tumor patients commonly undergo multimodality treatment in the course of their disease. Adverse effects and complications from these interventions have not been systematically studied, but pose significant challenges in clinical practice and impact function and quality of life, especially in the management of long-term brain tumor survivors. Here, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) has developed recommendations to prevent, diagnose, and manage adverse effects and complications in the adult primary brain CNS tumor (except lymphomas) patient population with a specific focus on surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy. Specifically, we also provide recommendations for dose adaptations, interruptions, and reexposure for pharmacotherapy that may serve as a reference for the management of standard of care in clinical trials. We also summarize which interventions are unnecessary, inactive or contraindicated. This consensus paper should serve as a reference for the conduct of standard therapy within and outside of clinical trials.

Seizure Management and Prophylaxis Considerations in Patients with Brain Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The article gives an overview of the current knowledge in the management of tumor related epilepsy, including systematic reviews and consensus statements as well as recent insight into a potentially more individualized treatment approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tumor molecular markers as IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status may provide future treatment targets. Seizure control should be included as a metric in assessing efficacy of tumor treatment. Prophylactic treatment is recommended in all brain tumor patients after the first seizure. Epilepsy has a profound effect on the quality of life in this patient group. The clinician should tailor the choice of seizure prophylactic treatment to the individual patient, with the goal of limiting adverse effects, avoiding interactions and obtaining a high degree of seizure freedom. Status epilepticus is associated with inferior survival and must be treated promptly. A multidisciplinary team should treat patients with brain tumors and epilepsy.

The complexities underlying epilepsy in people with glioblastoma

Seizures are among the most common clinical signs in people with glioblastoma. Advances over the past 5 years, including new clinical trial data, have increased the understanding of why some individuals with glioblastoma are susceptible to seizures, how seizures manifest clinically, and what implications seizures have for patient management. The pathophysiology of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma relates to a combination of intrinsic epileptogenicity of tumour tissue, alterations in the tumour and peritumoural microenvironment, and the physical and functional disturbance of adjacent brain structures. Successful management of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma remains challenging; factors such as drug-drug interactions between cancer therapies and antiseizure medications, and medication side-effects, can affect seizure outcomes and quality of life. Advances in novel therapies provide some promise for people with glioblastoma; however, the effects of these therapies on seizures are yet to be fully determined. Looking forward, insights into electrical activity as a driver of tumour cell growth and the intrinsic hyperexcitability of tumour tissue might represent useful targets for treatment and disease modification. There is a pressing need for large randomised clinical trials in this field.

Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review

PURPOSE

The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.

RESULTS

A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).

CONCLUSIONS

A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.

Palliative care and end-of-life care in adults with malignant brain tumors

BACKGROUND

This systematic review provides updated insights, from the published literature in the past 5 years, based on the 2017 European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for palliative care in adults with malignant brain tumors. It provides an overview of palliative care options, including during the end-of-life phase for patients with malignant brain tumors.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted from 2016 to 2021 focusing on four main topics: (1) symptom management, (2) caregiver needs, (3) early palliative care, and (4) care in the end-of-life phase. An international panel of palliative care experts in neuro-oncology synthesized the literature and reported the most relevant updates. A total of 140 articles were included.

RESULTS

New insights include that: Hippocampal avoidance and stereotactic radiosurgery results in a lower risk of neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases; levetiracetam is more efficacious in reducing seizures than valproic acid as first-line monotherapy antiseizure drug (ASD) in glioma patients; lacosamide and perampanel seem well-tolerated and efficacious add-on ASDs; and a comprehensive framework of palliative and supportive care for high-grade glioma patients and their caregivers was proposed. No pharmacological agents have been shown in randomized controlled trials to significantly improve fatigue or neurocognition.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the 2017 EANO palliative care guidelines, new insights have been reported regarding symptom management and end-of-life care, however, most recommendations remain unchanged. Early palliative care interventions are essential to define goals of care and minimize symptom burden in a timely fashion. Interventional studies that address pain, fatigue, and psychiatric symptoms as well as (the timing of) early palliative care are urgently needed.

The role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis

Traditionally, in the past, most of central nervous system metastases from solid tumors were associated with an advanced phase of the disease needing palliation only, while to date they increasingly develop as an early and/or solitary relapse in patients with the systemic disease under control. This review will cover all the aspects of a modern management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases from diagnosis to the different therapeutic options, either local (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance) or systemic. Particular emphasis is reserved to the new-targeted drugs, that allow to target specifically driver molecular alterations. These new compounds pose new problems in terms of monitoring efficacy and adverse events, but increasingly they allow improvement of outcome in comparison to historical controls.

Glioblastoma and Other Primary Brain Malignancies in Adults: A Review

Importance

Malignant primary brain tumors cause more than 15 000 deaths per year in the United States. The annual incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals and increases with age. Five-year survival is approximately 36%.

Observations

Approximately 49% of malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas, and 30% are diffusely infiltrating lower-grade gliomas. Other malignant brain tumors include primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (7%) and malignant forms of ependymomas (3%) and meningiomas (2%). Symptoms of malignant brain tumors include headache (50%), seizures (20%-50%), neurocognitive impairment (30%-40%), and focal neurologic deficits (10%-40%). Magnetic resonance imaging before and after a gadolinium-based contrast agent is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating brain tumors. Diagnosis requires tumor biopsy with consideration of histopathological and molecular characteristics. Treatment varies by tumor type and often includes a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. For patients with glioblastoma, the combination of temozolomide with radiotherapy improved survival when compared with radiotherapy alone (2-year survival, 27.2% vs 10.9%; 5-year survival, 9.8% vs 1.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]; P < .001). In patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors with 1p/19q codeletion, probable 20-year overall survival following radiotherapy without vs with the combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine was 13.6% vs 37.1% (80 patients; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.35-1.03]; P = .06) in the EORTC 26951 trial and 14.9% vs 37% in the RTOG 9402 trial (125 patients; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]; P = .02). Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma includes high-dose methotrexate-containing regimens, followed by consolidation therapy with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy regimens, or whole brain radiation.

Conclusions and Relevance

The incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals, and approximately 49% of primary malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas. Most patients die from progressive disease. First-line therapy for glioblastoma is surgery followed by radiation and the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide.

Antitumor Potential of Antiepileptic Drugs in Human Glioblastoma: Pharmacological Targets and Clinical Benefits

Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by fast-growing cells, genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, and radio-chemo-therapy resistance, contributing to its dismal prognosis. Various medical comorbidities are associated with the natural history of GBM. The most disabling and greatly affecting patients' quality of life are neurodegeneration, cognitive impairment, and GBM-related epilepsy (GRE). Hallmarks of GBM include molecular intrinsic mediators and pathways, but emerging evidence supports the key role of non-malignant cells within the tumor microenvironment in GBM aggressive behavior. In this context, hyper-excitability of neurons, mediated by glutamatergic and GABAergic imbalance, contributing to GBM growth strengthens the cancer-nervous system crosstalk. Pathogenic mechanisms, clinical features, and pharmacological management of GRE with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and their interactions are poorly explored, yet it is a potentially promising field of research in cancer neuroscience. The present review summarizes emerging cooperative mechanisms in oncogenesis and epileptogenesis, focusing on the neuron-to-glioma interface. The main effects and efficacy of selected AEDs used in the management of GRE are discussed in this paper, as well as their potential beneficial activity as antitumor treatment. Overall, although still many unclear processes overlapping in GBM growth and seizure onset need to be elucidated, this review focuses on the intriguing targeting of GBM-neuron mutual interactions to improve the outcome of the so challenging to treat GBM.

Advances in the Molecular Landscape of Lung Cancer Brain Metastasis

Lung cancer is one of the most frequent tumors that metastasize to the brain. Brain metastasis (BM) is common in advanced cases, being the major cause of patient morbidity and mortality. BMs are thought to arise via the seeding of circulating tumor cells into the brain microvasculature. In brain tissue, the interaction with immune cells promotes a microenvironment favorable to the growth of cancer cells. Despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, lung cancer patients still have poor prognoses. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify the molecular drivers of BM and clinically applicable biomarkers in order to improve disease outcomes and patient survival. The goal of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge on the mechanisms of the metastatic spread of lung cancer to the brain and how the metastatic spread is influenced by the brain microenvironment, and to elucidate the molecular determinants of brain metastasis regarding the role of genomic and transcriptomic changes, including coding and non-coding RNAs. We also present an overview of the current therapeutics and novel treatment strategies for patients diagnosed with BM from NSCLC.

Development of an integrated predictive model for postoperative glioma-related epilepsy using gene-signature and clinical data

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop an integrated model for predicting the occurrence of postoperative seizures in patients with diffuse high-grade gliomas (DHGGs) using clinical and RNA-seq data.

METHODS

Patients with DHGGs, who received prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for three months following surgery, were enrolled into the study. The patients were assigned randomly into training (n = 166) and validation (n = 42) cohorts. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified based on preoperative glioma-related epilepsy (GRE) history. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression analysis was used to construct a predictive gene-signature for the occurrence of postoperative seizures. The final integrated prediction model was generated using the gene-signature and clinical data. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration curve method were used to evaluate the accuracy of the gene-signature and prediction model using the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

A seven-gene signature for predicting the occurrence of postoperative seizures was developed using LASSO logistic regression analysis of 623 DEGs. The gene-signature showed satisfactory predictive capacity in the training cohort [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.842] and validation cohort (AUC = 0.751). The final integrated prediction model included age, temporal lobe involvement, preoperative GRE history, and gene-signature-derived risk score. The AUCs of the integrated prediction model were 0.878 and 0.845 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed an integrated prediction model for the occurrence of postoperative seizures in patients with DHGG using clinical and RNA-Seq data. The findings of this study may contribute to the development of personalized management strategies for patients with DHGGs and improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying GRE in these patients.

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on diagnosis, management, and future directions

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.

Bonaventura C, Marras CE, Palestini C, Ferlazzo E, Venturelli E, Dainese F, Martella F, Paladin F, Villani F, Capizzi G, Napoleoni L, Stanzani L, Stragapede L, Zummo L, Balducci M, Eoli M, Rizzi M, Vernaleone M, Messina R, Vittorini R, Gasparini S, Ius T, Cianci V, Manfioli V, Mariani V, Capovilla G. First-line levetiracetam versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medication in glioma patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to directly compare the effectiveness of first-line monotherapy levetiracetam (LEV) versus enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) in glioma patients.

METHODS

In this nationwide retrospective observational cohort study, Grade 2-4 glioma patients were included, with a maximum duration of follow-up of 36 months. Primary outcome was antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment failure for any reason, and secondary outcomes were treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures and due to adverse effects. For estimation of the association between ASM treatment and ASM treatment failure, multivariate cause-specific cox proportional hazard models were estimated, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

In the original cohort, a total of 808 brain tumor patients with epilepsy were included, of whom 109 glioma patients were prescribed first-line LEV and 183 glioma patients first-line EIASMs. The EIASM group had a significantly higher risk of treatment failure for any reason compared to LEV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-2.75, p = .005). Treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures did not differ significantly between EIASMs and LEV (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI = .78-2.25, p = .300), but treatment failure due to adverse effects differed significantly (aHR = 4.87, 95% CI = 1.89-12.55, p = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this study, it was demonstrated that LEV had a significantly better effectiveness (i.e., less ASM treatment failure for any reason or due to adverse effects) compared to EIASMs, supporting the current neuro-oncology guideline recommendations to avoid EIASMs in glioma patients.

Palliative care in brain tumors

The diagnosis of a brain tumor is a life-changing event for patients and families. High-grade gliomas (especially glioblastomas) are incurable, and long-term survival is limited. Metastatic brain lesions comprise the majority of intracranial neoplasms and are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic cancer. Response to treatment, prognosis, and survival depends not only on the underlying pathology, but more importantly on recently defined molecular features. Other crucial predictors of survival include age and performance status. Among patients with primary brain tumors, neurologic decline and psychological distress contribute to a high symptom burden and impaired quality of life (QoL) throughout the disease trajectory. While many symptoms in central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS cancers overlap, others predominate in the brain tumor population, including seizures, headaches, depression, fatigue, and treatment-induced toxicity, all of which can be addressed with palliative interventions. Patients, families, and caregivers also report disproportionately high supportive care needs, which frequently differ from those of other systemic cancers. In addition, progressive neurologic decline often results in impaired communication and decision-making capacity at the end of life. Early palliative care (PC) integration has become more common in systemic cancers, but remains limited in neuro-oncology. These factors combined contribute to a uniquely challenging disease course that may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach with early involvement of specialized (PC) to address tumor-related symptoms and improve QoL. We review how to approach patients with brain tumors and address prognosis, symptom management, and advance care planning with the goal of improving QoL for patients, families, and caregivers.

Brain Tumor Rehabilitation: Symptoms, Complications, and Treatment Strategy

Brain tumors are receiving increasing attention in cancer rehabilitation due to their high rate of neurological deterioration. Motor dysfunction, cognitive deterioration, and emotional problems are commonly present in patients with brain tumors. Other medical complications, such as seizures, headache, and dysphagia are also common. An individualized multidisciplinary rehabilitation intervention is necessary to treat functional impairment due to the tumor itself and/or treatment-related dysfunction. Herein, we discuss rehabilitation treatment strategies in relation to the neurological and functional complications that commonly occur in patients with brain tumors.

Management of epilepsy in brain tumor patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A concise review of recent findings in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), with focus on the effect of antitumor treatment on seizure control and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

RECENT FINDINGS

Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and its active metabolite d -2-hydroxyglutarate seem important contributing factors to epileptogenesis in BTRE. A beneficial effect of antitumor treatment (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) on seizure control has mainly been demonstrated in low-grade glioma. AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve BTRE patients is not recommended, but AED treatment should be initiated after a first seizure has occurred. Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently lacking, but second-generation AED levetiracetam seems the preferred choice in BTRE. Levetiracetam lacks significant drug-drug interactions, has shown favorable efficacy compared to valproic acid in BTRE, generally causes no hematological or neurocognitive functioning adverse effects, but caution should be exercised with regard to psychiatric adverse effects. Potential add-on AEDs in case of uncontrolled seizures include lacosamide, perampanel, and valproic acid. Ultimately, in the end-of-life phase when oral intake of medication is hampered, benzodiazepines via nonoral administration routes are potential alternatives.

SUMMARY

Management of seizures in BTRE is complex and with currently available evidence levetiracetam seems the preferred choice. Comparative efficacy RCTs in BTRE are warranted.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Postoperative Epileptic Seizures in Children

Background: Postoperative seizures (PS) occur in 10−15% of patients. This study aims to provide an update on the role of surgery in PS. Methods: All children undergoing a craniotomy for supratentorial lesions in the last 10 years were considered except those with preoperative seizures, perioperative antiepileptic drugs prophylaxis, head-injury and infections, repeated surgery, or preoperative hyponatremia. Children undergoing surgery for intra-axial lesions (Group 1, 74 cases) were compared with those harboring extra-axial lesions (Group 2, 91 cases). Results: PS occurred in 9% of 165 cases and epilepsy in 3% of 165 cases (mean follow-up: 5.7 years). There was no difference between the two study groups with regard to demographic data or tumor size. Group 1 showed a higher rate of gross total tumor resection (p = 0.002), while Group 2 had a higher rate of postoperative hyponatremia (p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the two groups in the occurrence of seizures (6.7% vs. 11%) or epilepsy (2.7% vs. 3.2%). No correlations were found between seizures and age, tumor location, histotype, tumor size, or the extent of tumor resection. Hyponatremia affected the risk of PS in Group 2 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study shows a lower rate of PS and epilepsy than series including children with preoperative seizures. Hyponatremia has a significant role. Neurosurgery is safe but surgical complications may cause late epilepsy.

Neural excitatory rebound induced by valproic acid may predict its inadequate control of seizures

Background

Valproic acid (VPA) represents one of the most efficient antiseizure medications (ASMs) for both general and focal seizures, but some patients may have inadequate control by VPA monotherapy. In this study, we aimed to verify the hypothesis that excitatory dynamic rebound induced by inhibitory power may contribute to the ineffectiveness of VPA therapy and become a predictor of post-operative inadequate control of seizures.

Methods

Awake craniotomy surgeries were performed in 16 patients with intro-operative high-density electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording. The relationship between seizure control and the excitatory rebound was further determined by diagnostic test and univariate analysis. Thereafter, kanic acid (KA)-induced epileptic mouse model was used to confirm that its behavior and neural activity would be controlled by VPA. Finally, a computational simulation model was established to verify the hypothesis.

Findings

Inadequate control of seizures by VPA monotherapy and post-operative status epilepticus are closely related to a significant excitatory rebound after VPA injection (rebound electrodes≧5/64, p = 0.008), together with increased synchronization of the local field potential (LFP). In addition, the neural activity in the model mice showed a significant rebound on spike firing (53/77 units, 68.83%). The LFP increased the power spectral density in multiple wavebands after VPA injection in animal experiments (p < 0.001). Computational simulation experiments revealed that inhibitory power-induced excitatory rebound is an intrinsic feature in the neural network.

Interpretation

Despite the limitations, we provide evidence that inadequate control of seizures by VPA monotherapy could be associated with neural excitatory rebounds, which were predicted by intraoperative ECoG analysis. Combined with the evidence from computational models and animal experiments, our findings suggested that ineffective ASMs may be because of the excitatory rebound, which is mediated by increased inhibitory power.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62127810, 81970418), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (2018SHZDZX03) and ZJLab; Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (18JC1410403, 19411969000, 19ZR1477700, 20Z11900100); MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Health Identification and Assessment (21DZ2271000); Shanghai Shenkang (SHDC2020CR3073B).

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding the use of levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in neurocritical care - an overview

INTRODUCTION

Levetiracetam (LEV) is one of the most widely used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in clinical practice. This is due both to a different mechanism of action when compared to other ASMs and its easy handling. Indeed, because of its interesting pharmacokinetic properties, it is often used outside of the labelled indications, notably in the neurocritical setting as prophylaxis of epileptic seizures.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted and the most relevant studies on the pharmacokinetic properties of LEV were selected by two independent investigators. Current evidence on the use of ASM prophylaxis in the neurocritical setting was also reviewed, highlighting and discussing the strengths and limits of LEV as drug of choice for anti-epileptic prophylaxis in this scenario.

EXPERT OPINION

LEV has a "near-ideal" pharmacokinetic profile, which makes it an attractive drug for ASM prophylaxis in neurocritical care. However, current recommendations restrict ASMs prophylaxis to very selected circumstances and the role of LEV is marginal. Moreover, studies are generally designed to compare LEV versus phenytoin, whereas studies comparing LEV versus placebo are lacking. Further randomized trials will be needed to better elucidate LEV utility and its neuroprotective role in the neurocritical setting.

The use of prophylactic antiepileptic medication and driving restrictions for craniotomies among Australian and New Zealand neurosurgeons

Prophylactic antiepileptic drug (pAED) use for craniotomy surgery is currently not supported in literature [1-5] except possibly in traumatic brain injury (TBI) [6]. Post craniotomy driving restrictions using the Austroad guidelines are based upon literature on TBI and not specifically craniotomy [16-18]. This study was to review Australian and New Zealand neurosurgeons on their use of pAED and advice on driving restrictions post craniotomy surgery. A voluntary and anonymous survey link was distributed to the members of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia (NSA) through the NSA newsletter. The survey was available on the SurveyMonkey platform in the year 2021 August to December. Questions regarding the use of pAED and duration of driving restrictions were presented to survey participants. Sixty-one (26 %) out of 231 neurosurgeons responded to the survey. Thirty-six percent of respondents stated that they prescribed pAEDs regularly whilst thirty-two percent of respondents did not routinely prescribe pAEDs for craniotomy surgery. Driving restrictions varied but the most common driving restriction post craniotomy surgery was 6 months. There were divided opinions among NSA members in regards to pAED use and driving restrictions. The rationale for pAED use and prolonged driving restrictions for craniotomy surgery needs to be re-evaluated with current literature. The significant effect this may have on the well-being and quality life of patients need to be considered before prescribing pAEDs or long driving restrictions.

Perioperative levetiracetam for seizure prophylaxis in seizure-naive brain tumor patients with focus on neurocognitive functioning

Introduction

In seizure-naive brain tumor patients, the efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug treatment remains controversial. In case of administration, the common preferred drug is levetiracetam (LEV) because of its favorable pharmacological profile. Research to date has not sufficiently determined how LEV affects cognition in the short term, as is the case in the perioperative period. The objective of this prospective study was to examine the neurocognitive functioning of seizure-naive brain tumor patients after receiving LEV perioperatively.

Methods

Fortythree patients with supratentorial brain tumor scheduled for surgery received LEV three days before until six days after surgery as seizure prophylaxis. Cognitive functioning (NeuroCogFX), LEV plasma-levels, hematotoxicity, side-effects, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Qolie31), were recorded preoperatively before (Baseline) and after onset of LEV (Pre-Op), 4–6 days postoperatively (Post-Op) and 21 days postoperatively (Follow-Up).

Results

No significant changes in cognitive functioning and HRQoL were seen after onset of preoperative LEV. There was a significant improvement of NeuroCogFX total-score at Follow-Up (p = 0.004) compared to Baseline. The overall-score Qolie31 showed simultaneous improvement patterns as cognitive functioning (p < 0.001). The most frequent side effect related to study drug was somnolence (in 28.6% of patients).

Conclusions

A significant improvement of cognitive functioning, as well as an improvement in HRQoL, were detected postoperatively. This is presumably due to the debulking effect of the surgery. Nevertheless, LEV has no detrimental effect on cognitive functioning in the perioperative phase in seizure-naive brain tumor patients.

Trial registration

This study was registered prospectively (Date: 25/11/2015; EudraCT: 2015–003,916-19).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02762-7.

Expression changes in ion channel and immunity genes are associated with glioma-related epilepsy in patients with diffuse gliomas

BACKGROUND

Glioma-related epilepsy (GRE) is a common symptom in patients with diffuse gliomas. However, the underlying mechanisms of GRE remain unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the underlying epileptogenic mechanisms of GRE through RNA sequencing analysis.

METHODS

Demographic, RNA sequencing, and follow-up data of 643 patients were reviewed. Patients were divided into test and validation groups (223 and 420 patients, respectively) by different time periods for RNA sequencing. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with preoperative GRE were identified using R software. Functional enrichment analysis was subsequently performed, and tissue-infiltrating immune cells were also estimated. Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) was conducted to further identify key modules exhibiting the highest correlation with preoperative GRE. Overlapping genes between the DEG set and key gene set identified by WGCNA were selected and verified in the validation cohort. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was then constructed to identify hub genes for preoperative GRE.

RESULTS

A total of 219 DEGs were identified, among which 112 were upregulated and 107 downregulated in patients with GRE. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that upregulated DEGs were related to ion channel activity, while downregulated genes were related to immunity. Forty-two genes were further selected from overlapping DEGs and the key gene set. Among these genes, 31 genes showed significant differences in the validation cohort. Finally, the PPI network analysis identified six genes, including SCN3B, KCNIP2, KCNJ11, VEGFA, MMP9, and ANXA2, as hub genes for GRE.

CONCLUSION

The current study revealed that ion channel activity and immunity dysfunction in diffuse glioma patients contributed to the occurrence of GRE, and SCN3B might be a shared therapeutic target for both diffuse gliomas and GRE. These findings could improve the understanding of the mechanisms of GRE and promote individualized medications for glioma management.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cranial Tumor Resection: A Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols describe a standardized method of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks surrounding elective surgical intervention. A growing body of evidence is being generated as we learn to apply principles of ERAS standardization to neurosurgical patients. First applied in spinal surgery, ERAS protocols have been extended to cranial neuro-oncological procedures. This review synthesizes recent findings to generate evidence-based guidelines to manage neurosurgical oncology patients with standardized systems and assess ability of these systems to coordinate multidisciplinary, patient-centric care efforts. Furthermore, we highlight the potential utility of multimedia, app-based communication platforms to facilitate patient education, autonomy, and team communication within each of the three settings.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021)

Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is a severe complication in cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common types of malignant intracranial tumors and are reported in approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancers. The recent increase in incidence of BMs is due to several factors including better diagnostic assessments and the development of improved systemic therapies that have lower activity on the CNS. However, newer systemic therapies are being developed that can cross the blood-brain barrier giving us additional tools to treat BMs. The guidelines presented here focus on the efficacy of new targeted systemic therapies and immunotherapies on CNS BMs from breast, melanoma, and lung cancers.

Relevant pharmacologic interactions in the concurrent management of brain tumor-related epilepsy and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Co-administration of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is increasingly common in brain tumor patients. We therefore performed a systematic review of the current evidence for potential drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs in this patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature via PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines (last accessed December 15, 2021). Included were clinical studies and case reports, written in English language and published between 2010 and 2021, that investigated concurrent clinical use of AEDs with DOACs for any indication. Non-English articles, articles not related to our research question, review articles and commentaries were excluded. Full-text articles were evaluated for possible confounding factors and results were summarized using a data table highlighting the key characteristics of each article.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 122 unique articles, of which 27 were deemed relevant to our research question. Of these, 8 articles were clinical studies (n = 295,415 patients) and 19 were case reports (n = 25 patients). Only 3 clinical studies and 2 case reports reported interactions between AEDs and DOACs in patients with active cancer and none reported interactions in patients with brain tumors.

CONCLUSION

We have identified low (class IV) level evidence of potential drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs. Even though there is no current report of interactions in brain tumor patients, neuro-oncology providers should be aware of the emerging evidence regarding drug interactions between DOACs and AEDs and take this into consideration when concurrently prescribing these to patients.

Easing the Journey-an Updated Review of Palliative Care for the Patient with High-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are rare brain tumors that cause disproportionate suffering and mortality. Palliative care, whose aim is to relieve the symptoms and stressors of serious illness, may benefit patients with HGG and their families. In this review, we summarize the extant literature and provide recommendations for addressing the symptom management and communication needs of brain tumor patients and their caregivers at key points in the illness trajectory: initial diagnosis; during upfront treatment; disease recurrence; end-of-life period; and after death during bereavement.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with HGG experience highly intrusive symptoms, cognitive and functional decline, and emotional and existential distress throughout the disease course. The caregiver burden is also substantial during the patient's illness and after death. There is limited evidence to guide the palliative management of these issues. Palliative care is likely to benefit patients with HGG, yet further research is needed to optimize the delivery of palliative care in neuro-oncology.

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes for early postoperative seizures in dogs with rostrotentorial brain tumors after intracranial surgery

Background

Seizures in the early postoperative period after intracranial surgery may affect outcome in dogs.

Objectives

To determine the incidence of early postoperative seizures (EPS) in dogs with brain tumors, identify specific risk factors for EPS, and determine if EPS affects outcome.

Animals

Eighty‐eight dogs that underwent 125 intracranial surgeries for diagnosis and treatment of rostrotentorial brain tumors.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study. All patients with a diagnosis of rostrotentorial brain tumor from 2006 to 2020 were included. Early postoperative seizures were diagnosed by observation of seizure activity within 14 days of neurosurgery. Previously diagnosed structural epilepsy, perioperative anticonvulsant drug (ACD) use, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Outcome measures included neurologic and nonneurologic complications, duration of hospitalization, and survival to discharge.

Results

Dogs with rostrotentorial brain tumors had EPS after 16/125 (12.8%) neurosurgical procedures (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%‐19%). Presence of previous structural epilepsy was not associated with EPS risk (P = 1). Perioperative ACD use also was not associated with EPS (P = .06). Dogs with EPS had longer hospitalization (P < .001), were more likely to have neurologic complications postsurgery (P = .01), and were less likely to survive to discharge (P = .01).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

It is difficult to predict which dogs are at risk of EPS because the presence of previous structural epilepsy and the use of perioperative ACDs was not associated with EPS. However, seizures in the early postoperative period are clinically important because affected dogs had prolonged hospitalization, more neurologic complications, and decreased short‐term survival.