1
|
Shekarian T, Ritz MF, Hogan S, Martins TA, Schmassmann P, Gerber A, Roux J, Kaymak D, Durano C, Burger B, Matter M, Hutter G. Multidimensional analysis of matched primary and recurrent glioblastoma identifies contributors to tumor recurrence influencing time to relapse. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2024:nlae108. [PMID: 39423857 DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlae108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal brain tumor without effective treatment options. This study aimed to characterize longitudinal tumor changes in order to find potentially actionable targets to prevent GBM relapse. We extracted RNA and proteins from fresh frozen tumor samples from patient-matched IDHwt WHO grade 4 primary (pGBM) and recurrent (rGBM) tumors for transcriptomics and proteomics analysis. A tissue microarray containing paired tumor samples was processed for spatial transcriptomics analysis. Differentially expressed genes and proteins between pGBM and rGBM were involved in synapse development and myelination. By categorizing patients into short (STTR) and long (LTTR) time-to-lapse, we identified genes/proteins whose expression levels positively or negatively correlated with TTR. In rGBM, expressions of Fcγ receptors (FCGRs) and complement system genes were negatively correlated with TTR, whereas expression of genes involved in DNA methylation was positively correlated with TTR. Spatial transcriptomics of the tumor cells showed enrichment of oligodendrocytes in rGBM. Besides, we observed changes in the myeloid compartment such as a switch from quiescent to activated microglia and an enrichment in B and T cells in rGBM with STTR. Our results uncover a role for activated microglia/macrophages in GBM recurrence and suggest that interfering with these cells may hinder GBM relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tala Shekarian
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Françoise Ritz
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Hogan
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tomás A Martins
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip Schmassmann
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Gerber
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julien Roux
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Kaymak
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Célia Durano
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Burger
- Dermatology, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Matter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gregor Hutter
- Brain Tumor Immunotherapy and Biology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Y, Zhou F, Ali H, Lathia JD, Chen P. Immunotherapy for glioblastoma: current state, challenges, and future perspectives. Cell Mol Immunol 2024:10.1038/s41423-024-01226-x. [PMID: 39406966 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-024-01226-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 09/18/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and lethal type of brain tumor in human adults. The standard of care offers minimal clinical benefit, and most GBM patients experience tumor recurrence after treatment. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of novel immunotherapies or other therapeutic strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in many advanced cancers. However, the benefit of immune-based treatments in GBM is limited because of the unique brain immune profiles, GBM cell heterogeneity, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In this review, we present a detailed overview of current immunotherapeutic strategies and discuss the challenges and potential molecular mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in GBM. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth discussion regarding the strategies that can overcome immunotherapy resistance in GBM, which will likely require combination therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Fei Zhou
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Heba Ali
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Justin D Lathia
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor & Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Peiwen Chen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nader NE, Frederico SC, Miller T, Huq S, Zhang X, Kohanbash G, Hadjipanayis CG. Barriers to T Cell Functionality in the Glioblastoma Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3273. [PMID: 39409893 PMCID: PMC11476085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor depicted by a cold tumor microenvironment, low immunogenicity, and limited effective therapeutic interventions. Its location in the brain, a highly immune-selective organ, acts as a barrier, limiting immune access and promoting GBM dissemination, despite therapeutic interventions. Currently, chemotherapy and radiation combined with surgical resection are the standard of care for GBM treatment. Although immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors, its observed success in extracranial tumors has not translated into a significant survival benefit for GBM patients. To develop effective immunotherapies for GBM, it is vital to tailor treatments to overcome the numerous immunosuppressive barriers that inhibit T cell responses to these tumors. In this review, we address the unique physical and immunological barriers that make GBM challenging to treat. Additionally, we explore potential therapeutic mechanisms, studied in central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS cancers, that may overcome these barriers. Furthermore, we examine current and promising immunotherapy clinical trials and immunotherapeutic interventions for GBM. By highlighting the array of challenges T cell-based therapies face in GBM, we hope this review can guide investigators as they develop future immunotherapies for this highly aggressive malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor E. Nader
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (N.E.N.); (S.C.F.); (T.M.)
| | - Stephen C. Frederico
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (N.E.N.); (S.C.F.); (T.M.)
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;
| | - Tracy Miller
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; (N.E.N.); (S.C.F.); (T.M.)
| | - Sakibul Huq
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA;
| | - Xiaoran Zhang
- Sloan Kettering Memorial Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Gary Kohanbash
- Sloan Kettering Memorial Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thomas P, Paris P, Pecqueur C. Arming Vδ2 T Cells with Chimeric Antigen Receptors to Combat Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:3105-3116. [PMID: 38747974 PMCID: PMC11292201 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising approach in the field of cancer treatment, with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrating remarkable success. However, challenges such as tumor antigen heterogeneity, immune evasion, and the limited persistence of CAR-T cells have prompted the exploration of alternative cell types for CAR-based strategies. Gamma delta T cells, a unique subset of lymphocytes with inherent tumor recognition capabilities and versatile immune functions, have garnered increasing attention in recent years. In this review, we present how arming Vδ2-T cells might be the basis for next-generation immunotherapies against solid tumors. Following a comprehensive overview of γδ T-cell biology and innovative CAR engineering strategies, we discuss the clinical potential of Vδ2 CAR-T cells in overcoming the current limitations of immunotherapy in solid tumors. Although the applications of Vδ2 CAR-T cells in cancer research are relatively in their infancy and many challenges are yet to be identified, Vδ2 CAR-T cells represent a promising breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Thomas
- Nantes Université, CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Nantes, France
| | - Pierre Paris
- Nantes Université, CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Nantes, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang C, Liu L, Li X, Lei J, Li Y, Shen Z, Shi H, Cheng Y. PD-1 inhibitor plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer. Future Oncol 2024; 20:1415-1426. [PMID: 38861299 PMCID: PMC11376421 DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2342241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: The prognosis of high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) remains poor following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We investigated whether the effect of CCRT can be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT group (n = 82) and PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT group (n = 70).Results: Compared with the CCRT group, the PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT group had significantly higher objective response rate, median progression-free survival, leukopenia and fatigue. The addition of PD-1 inhibitor to CCRT showed a favorable trend in overall survival without statistical significance.Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus CCRT presented a significant survival benefit and a manageable safety profile in high-risk LACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Wang
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Lijun Liu
- Department of Rheumatology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Xia Li
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Jia Lei
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Yiqian Li
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Zhibo Shen
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Huirong Shi
- Department of Gynecology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| | - Yan Cheng
- Department of Gynecological Radiation Oncology, Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, No 1. Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450000, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Romanishin A, Vasilev A, Khasanshin E, Evtekhov A, Pusynin E, Rubina K, Kakotkin V, Agapov M, Semina E. Oncolytic viral therapy for gliomas: Advances in the mechanisms and approaches to delivery. Virology 2024; 593:110033. [PMID: 38442508 DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2024.110033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Glioma is a diverse category of tumors originating from glial cells encompasses various subtypes, based on the specific type of glial cells involved. The most aggressive is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which stands as the predominant primary malignant tumor within the central nervous system in adults. Despite the application of treatment strategy, the median survival rate for GBM patients still hovers around 15 months. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are artificially engineered viruses designed to selectively target and induce apoptosis in cancer cells. While clinical trials have demonstrated encouraging results with intratumoral OV injections for some cancers, applying this approach to GBM presents unique challenges. Here we elaborate on current trends in oncolytic viral therapy and their delivery methods. We delve into the various methods of delivering OVs for therapy, exploring their respective advantages and disadvantages and discussing how selecting the optimal delivery method can enhance the efficacy of this innovative treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Romanishin
- Institute of Medicine and Life Science, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia.
| | - A Vasilev
- Institute of Medicine and Life Science, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia
| | - E Khasanshin
- Kaliningrad Regional Hospital, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russia
| | - A Evtekhov
- Kaliningrad Regional Hospital, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russia
| | - E Pusynin
- Kaliningrad Regional Hospital, Kaliningrad, 236016, Russia
| | - K Rubina
- Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Lomonosovsky Ave., 27/1, 119991, Moscow, Russia
| | - V Kakotkin
- Institute of Medicine and Life Science, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia
| | - M Agapov
- Institute of Medicine and Life Science, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Lomonosovsky Ave., 27/1, 119991, Moscow, Russia
| | - E Semina
- Institute of Medicine and Life Science, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, 236041, Russia; Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Lomonosovsky Ave., 27/1, 119991, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salvato I, Marchini A. Immunotherapeutic Strategies for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1276. [PMID: 38610954 PMCID: PMC11010873 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite decades of research and the best up-to-date treatments, grade 4 Glioblastoma (GBM) remains uniformly fatal with a patient median overall survival of less than 2 years. Recent advances in immunotherapy have reignited interest in utilizing immunological approaches to fight cancer. However, current immunotherapies have so far not met the anticipated expectations, achieving modest results in their journey from bench to bedside for the treatment of GBM. Understanding the intrinsic features of GBM is of crucial importance for the development of effective antitumoral strategies to improve patient life expectancy and conditions. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the distinctive characteristics of GBM that significantly influence current conventional therapies and immune-based approaches. Moreover, we present an overview of the immunotherapeutic strategies currently undergoing clinical evaluation for GBM treatment, with a specific emphasis on those advancing to phase 3 clinical studies. These encompass immune checkpoint inhibitors, adoptive T cell therapies, vaccination strategies (i.e., RNA-, DNA-, and peptide-based vaccines), and virus-based approaches. Finally, we explore novel innovative strategies and future prospects in the field of immunotherapy for GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Salvato
- NORLUX Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg;
- Laboratory of Oncolytic Virus Immuno-Therapeutics (LOVIT), Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of Life Sciences and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM), University of Luxembourg, L-4367 Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Antonio Marchini
- Laboratory of Oncolytic Virus Immuno-Therapeutics (LOVIT), Department of Cancer Research, Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH), L-1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Laboratory of Oncolytic Virus Immuno-Therapeutics, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stepanenko AA, Sosnovtseva AO, Valikhov MP, Chernysheva AA, Abramova OV, Naumenko VA, Chekhonin VP. The need for paradigm shift: prognostic significance and implications of standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression in glioblastoma for immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1326757. [PMID: 38390330 PMCID: PMC10881776 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1326757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite significant advances in our knowledge regarding the genetics and molecular biology of gliomas over the past two decades and hundreds of clinical trials, no effective therapeutic approach has been identified for adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, and overall survival remains dismal. Great hopes are now placed on combination immunotherapy. In clinical trials, immunotherapeutics are generally tested after standard therapy (radiation, temozolomide, and steroid dexamethasone) or concurrently with temozolomide and/or steroids. Only a minor subset of patients with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma have benefited from immunotherapies. In this review, we comprehensively discuss standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia, their prognostic significance, and the implications for immunotherapy/oncolytic virotherapy. The effectiveness of immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy (viro-immunotherapy) critically depends on the activity of the host immune cells. The absolute counts, ratios, and functional states of different circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cell subsets determine the net immune fitness of patients with cancer and may have various effects on tumor progression, therapeutic response, and survival outcomes. Although different immunosuppressive mechanisms operate in patients with glioblastoma/gliomas at presentation, the immunological competence of patients may be significantly compromised by standard therapy, exacerbating tumor-related systemic immunosuppression. Standard therapy affects diverse immune cell subsets, including dendritic, CD4+, CD8+, natural killer (NK), NKT, macrophage, neutrophil, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC). Systemic immunosuppression and lymphopenia limit the immune system's ability to target glioblastoma. Changes in the standard therapy are required to increase the success of immunotherapies. Steroid use, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and low post-treatment total lymphocyte count (TLC) are significant prognostic factors for shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma in retrospective studies; however, these clinically relevant variables are rarely reported and correlated with response and survival in immunotherapy studies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and oncolytic viruses). Our analysis should help in the development of a more rational clinical trial design and decision-making regarding the treatment to potentially improve the efficacy of immunotherapy or oncolytic virotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksei A. Stepanenko
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasiia O. Sosnovtseva
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marat P. Valikhov
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia A. Chernysheva
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga V. Abramova
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor A. Naumenko
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vladimir P. Chekhonin
- Department of Fundamental and Applied Neurobiology, V. P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Translational Medicine, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, The Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Broggi G, Angelico G, Farina J, Tinnirello G, Barresi V, Zanelli M, Palicelli A, Certo F, Barbagallo G, Magro G, Caltabiano R. Tumor-associated microenvironment, PD-L1 expression and their relationship with immunotherapy in glioblastoma, IDH-wild type: A comprehensive review with emphasis on the implications for neuropathologists. Pathol Res Pract 2024; 254:155144. [PMID: 38277747 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Although novel knowledge has been acquired on the molecular landscape of glioblastoma (GBM), a relatively few steps forward have been made regarding its therapy. With the increasing use of novel immunotherapeutic drugs capable of stimulating the antitumor inflammatory response, in the last decades numerous studies aimed to characterize the tumor-associated microenvironment (TME) and its relationship with the immunogenicity of GBM. In this regard, although the tumor-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs) and PD-L1/PD-1 axis have been emerged as one of the most relevant components of the GBM TME and one of the potential molecular pathways targetable with immunotherapy, respectively. It has been supposed that TAMs may acquire different phenotypes, switching from M1 to M2 phenotypes, with tumor-suppressive and tumor-stimulating role depending on the different surrounding conditions. PD-L1 is a type 1 transmembrane protein ligand expressed by T-cells, B-cells and antigen-presenting cells, with a main inhibitory checkpoint role on tumor immune regulation. While PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression has been extensively investigated in many cancers, its usefulness in the evaluation of GBM response rates to immunotherapy and its standardized evaluation by immunohistochemistry are still debated. The present review paper focuses on the current "state of the art" about the relationship between TME, PD-L1/PD-1 pathway and immunotherapy in GBM, also providing neuropathologists with an updated guide about the clinical trials conducted with PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Broggi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Angelico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Jessica Farina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Giordana Tinnirello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Valeria Barresi
- Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Anatomic Pathology, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
| | - Magda Zanelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia 42123, Italy
| | - Andrea Palicelli
- Pathology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia 42123, Italy
| | - Francesco Certo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico-S. Marco" University Hospital, Catania 95121, Italy; Interdisciplinary Research Center on Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Barbagallo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G. Rodolico-S. Marco" University Hospital, Catania 95121, Italy; Interdisciplinary Research Center on Brain Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Gaetano Magro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| | - Rosario Caltabiano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, Catania 95123, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen SF, Kau M, Wang YC, Chen MH, Tung FI, Chen MH, Liu TY. Synergistically Enhancing Immunotherapy Efficacy in Glioblastoma with Gold-Core Silica-Shell Nanoparticles and Radiation. Int J Nanomedicine 2023; 18:7677-7693. [PMID: 38111846 PMCID: PMC10726961 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s440405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive brain tumor with universally poor outcomes. Recent progress in immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to increased interest in their application in glioblastoma. Nonetheless, the unique immune milieu in the brain has posed remarkable challenges to the efficacy of immunotherapy. We aimed to leverage the radiation-induced immunogenic cell death to overcome the immunosuppressive network in glioblastoma. Methods We developed a novel approach using the gold-core silica-shell nanoparticles (Au@SiO2 NPs) in combination with low-dose radiation to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (atezolizumab) in brain tumors. The biocompatibility, immune cell recruitment, and antitumor ability of the combinatorial strategy were determined using in vitro assays and in vivo models. Results Our approach successfully induced the migration of macrophages towards brain tumors and promoted cancer cell apoptosis. Subcutaneous tumor models demonstrated favorable safety profiles and significantly enhanced anticancer effects. In orthotopic brain tumor models, the multimodal therapy yielded substantial prognostic benefits over any individual modalities, achieving an impressive 40% survival rate. Conclusion In summary, the combination of Au@SiO2 NPs and low-dose radiation holds the potential to improve the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The synergetic strategy modulates tumor microenvironments and enhances systemic antitumor immunity, paving a novel way for glioblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo-Fu Chen
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Min Kau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chi Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hong Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Fu-I Tung
- Department of Orthopedics, Yang-Ming Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Health and Welfare, College of City Management, University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Hsiu Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Tse-Ying Liu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hovhannisyan L, Riether C, Aebersold DM, Medová M, Zimmer Y. CAR T cell-based immunotherapy and radiation therapy: potential, promises and risks. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:82. [PMID: 37173782 PMCID: PMC10176707 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01775-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
CAR T cell-based therapies have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies such as leukemia and lymphoma within the last years. In contrast to the success in hematological cancers, the treatment of solid tumors with CAR T cells is still a major challenge in the field and attempts to overcome these hurdles have not been successful yet. Radiation therapy is used for management of various malignancies for decades and its therapeutic role ranges from local therapy to a priming agent in cancer immunotherapy. Combinations of radiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors have already proven successful in clinical trials. Therefore, a combination of radiation therapy may have the potential to overcome the current limitations of CAR T cell therapy in solid tumor entities. So far, only limited research was conducted in the area of CAR T cells and radiation. In this review we will discuss the potential and risks of such a combination in the treatment of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusine Hovhannisyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Riether
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Medová
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland
| | - Yitzhak Zimmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Freiburgstrasse 8, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
- Department for Biomedical Research, Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|