Early measures of cognitive function predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition

PURPOSE

After glioblastoma (GB) recurrence, prognosis is very cumbersome. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and neurocognitive functioning (NCF) have become important endpoints in clinical trials when evaluating novel treatments. We aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and NCF in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB) treated with a combination of surgical intervention (reoperation or biopsy) and intracerebral immune checkpoint inhibition.

METHODS

Patients who participated in the trial (N = 23), at a single-center university hospital were included. Data were collected using 3 patient-reported outcome measures (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and HADS) and computerized NCF testing. In the responder group, baseline values were compared to results at a 6-month follow-up. Additionally, exploratory analyses compared baseline HRQoL and NCF between responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

There were five responders and 18 non-responders. When comparing the mean and individual baseline with follow-up results for the responders, we observed overall a stable to slight clinically relevant improvement of HRQoL in multiple subsets of the questionnaires while maintaining a stable NCF. One patient deteriorated on anxiety and depression symptoms from baseline to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients that responded to intracerebral immunotherapy in our institutional trial, HRQoL and NCF remained stable over time, suggesting that no detrimental effect on cognitive function or quality of life may be expected with this treatment approach. Furthermore, there seems to be an overall tendency for responders to score better on HRQoL and NCF than non-responders at baseline.

Unsupervised machine learning models reveal predictive clinical markers of glioblastoma patient survival using white blood cell counts prior to initiating chemoradiation

Background

Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor requiring careful clinical monitoring even after primary management. Personalized medicine has suggested the use of various molecular biomarkers as predictors of patient prognosis or factors utilized for clinical decision-making. However, the accessibility of such molecular testing poses a constraint for various institutes requiring identification of low-cost predictive biomarkers to ensure equitable care.

Methods

We collected retrospective data from patients seen at Ohio State University, University of Mississippi, Barretos Cancer Hospital (Brazil), and FLENI (Argentina) who were managed for glioblastoma-amounting to 581 patient records documented using REDCap. Patients were evaluated using an unsupervised machine learning approach comprised of dimensionality reduction and eigenvector analysis to visualize the inter-relationship of collected clinical features.

Results

We discovered that the serum white blood cell (WBC) count of a patient during baseline planning for treatment was predictive of overall survival with an over 6-month median survival difference between the upper and lower quartiles of WBC count. By utilizing an objective PD-L1 immunohistochemistry quantification algorithm, we were further able to identify an increase in PD-L1 expression in glioblastoma patients with high serum WBC counts.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that in a subset of glioblastoma patients the incorporation of WBC count and PD-L1 expression in the brain tumor biopsy as simple biomarkers predicting glioblastoma patient survival. Moreover, machine learning models allow the distillation of complex clinical data sets to uncover novel and meaningful clinical relationships.

Cognitive functioning is prognostic in patients with IDH1-wild type and MGMT-unmethylated high-grade gliomas

AIM

To investigate the prognostic factors of survival in patients with high-grade gliomas without isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH) mutation and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation.

METHODS

The study enrolled Slovenian patients with high-grade gliomas. Postoperatively, they completed a battery of neuropsychological tests. Demographics and clinical data were collected. The results of cognitive tests were converted to standardized scores and dichotomized based on impairment. A univariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine clinical predictors, and a multivariate Cox model was used to determine the prognostic value of cognitive test results. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and survival was compared with the log rank test.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 49 patients with IDH wild-type, MGMT-unmethylated high-grade gliomas. The median time to progression was 9.92 months (7.25, 12.59) and the overall median survival was 12.19 months (8.95, 15.4). Age and the extent of surgery were significant prognostic factors for survival. After controlling for these factors, cognitive functioning in the domain of verbal fluency remained a significant predictor of survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive functioning in the domain of verbal fluency was associated with overall survival independently of age and the extent of surgery. Cognitive functioning could be an important stratifying tool in this group of patients lacking other predictors.

Preoperative neurocognitive function as an independent survival prognostic marker in primary glioblastoma

Background

Aim of the present study is to investigate whether preoperative neurocognitive status is prognostically associated with overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients.

Methods

Ninety patients with dominant-hemisphere IDH-wild-type GBM were assessed by Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B parts, and Control Word Association Test (COWAT) phonemic and semantic subtests. Demographics, Karnofsky Performance Scale, tumor parameters, type of surgery, and adjuvant therapy data were available for patients.

Results

According to Cox proportional hazards model the neurocognitive variables of TMT B (P < .01), COWAT semantic subset (P < .05), and the MMSE (P < .01) were found significantly associated with survival prediction. From all other factors, only tumor volume and operation type (debulking vs biopsy) showed a statistical association (P < .05) with survival prediction. Kaplan Meier Long rank test showed statistical significance (P < .01) between unimpaired and impaired groups for TMT B, with median survival for the unimpaired group 26 months and 10 months for the impaired group, for COWAT semantic (P < .01) with median survival 23 months and 12 months, respectively and for MMSE (P < .01) with medial survival 19 and 12 months respectively.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that neurocognitive status at baseline-prior to treatment-is an independent prognostic factor for OS in wild-type GBM patients, adding another prognostic tool to assist physicians in selecting the best treatment plan.

Disease Assessments in Patients with Glioblastoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The neuro-oncology team faces a unique challenge when assessing treatment response in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the standard imaging modality for measuring therapeutic response in both clinical practice and clinical trials. However, even for the neuroradiologist, MRI interpretations are not straightforward because of tumor heterogeneity, as evidenced by varying degrees of enhancement, infiltrating tumor patterns, cellular densities, and vasogenic edema. The situation is even more perplexing following therapy since treatment-related changes can mimic viable tumor. Additionally, antiangiogenic therapies can dramatically decrease contrast enhancement giving the false impression of decreasing tumor burden. Over the past few decades, several approaches have emerged to augment and improve visual interpretation of glioblastoma response to therapeutics. Herein, we summarize the state of the art for evaluating the response of glioblastoma to standard therapies and investigational agents as well as challenges and future directions for assessing treatment response in neuro-oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Monitoring glioblastoma responses to standard therapy and novel agents has been fraught with many challenges and limitations over the past decade. Excitingly, new promising methods are emerging to help address these challenges. Recently, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group proposed an updated response criteria (RANO 2.0) for the evaluation of all grades of glial tumors regardless of IDH status or therapies being evaluated. In addition, advanced neuroimaging techniques, such as histogram analysis, parametric response maps, morphometric segmentation, radio pharmacodynamics approaches, and the integrating of amino acid radiotracers in the tumor evaluation algorithm may help resolve equivocal lesion interpretations without operative intervention. Moreover, the introduction of other techniques, such as liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence could complement conventional visual assessment of glioblastoma response to therapies. Neuro-oncology has evolved over the past decade and has achieved significant milestones, including the establishment of new standards of care, emerging therapeutic options, and novel clinical, translational, and basic research. More recently, the integration of histopathology with molecular features for tumor classification has marked an important paradigm shift in brain tumor diagnosis. In a similar manner, treatment response monitoring in neuro-oncology has made considerable progress. While most techniques are still in their inception, there is an emerging body of evidence for clinical application. Further research will be critically important for the development of impactful breakthroughs in this area of the field.

Cognitive functioning in a cohort of high-grade glioma patients

BACKGROUND

High grade gliomas are associated with cognitive problems. The aim of the study was to investigate cognitive functioning in a cohort of patients with high grade glioma, according to isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) and methyl guanine methyl transferase (MGMT) status and other clinical characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients with the high-grade glioma treated in Slovenia in given period of time were included in study. Postoperatively they completed neuropsychological assessment consisting of Slovenian Verbal Learning Test, Slovenian Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Trail Making Test Part A and B and self-evaluation questionnaire. We analysed results (z-scores and dichotomized results) also according to IDH mutation and MGMT methylation. We examined differences between groups using T-test, Mann-Whitney U, χ² and Kendall's Tau tests.

RESULTS

Out of 275 patients in the cohort, we included 90. Forty-six percent of patients were unable to participate due to poor performance status and other conditions related to tumour. Patients with the IDH mutation were younger, with better performance status, larger proportions of grade III tumours and MGMT methylation. In this group cognitive functioning is significantly better in the domains of immediate recall, short delayed recall and delayed recall, and in the fields of executive functioning and recognition. There were no differences in cognitive functioning in regard to MGMT status. Grade III tumours were associated with more frequent MGMT methylation. Self-assessment proved week tool, associated only with immediate recall.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no differences in cognitive functioning according to MGMT status, but cognition was better when IDH mutation was present. In a cohort study of patients with high-grade glioma, almost half were unable to participate in a study, which points to an overrepresentation of patients with better cognitive functioning in the research.

Unsupervised machine learning models reveal predictive markers of glioblastoma patient survival using white blood cell counts prior to initiating chemoradiation

Purpose

Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor requiring careful clinical monitoring even after primary management. Personalized medicine has suggested use of various molecular biomarkers as predictors of patient prognosis or factors utilized for clinical decision making. However, the accessibility of such molecular testing poses a constraint for various institutes requiring identification of low-cost predictive biomarkers to ensure equitable care.

Methods

We collected retrospective data from patients seen at Ohio State University, University of Mississippi, Barretos Cancer Hospital (Brazil), and FLENI (Argentina) who were managed for glioblastoma-amounting to nearly 600 patient records documented using REDCap. Patients were evaluated using an unsupervised machine learning approach comprised of dimensionality reduction and eigenvector analysis to visualize the inter-relationship of collected clinical features.

Results

We discovered that white blood cell count of a patient during baseline planning for treatment was predictive of overall survival with an over 6-month median survival difference between the upper and lower quartiles of white blood cell count. By utilizing an objective PDL-1 immunohistochemistry quantification algorithm, we were further able to identify an increase in PDL-1 expression in glioblastoma patients with high white blood cell counts.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that in a subset of glioblastoma patients the incorporation of white blood cell count and PDL-1 expression in the brain tumor biopsy as simple biomarkers predicting glioblastoma patient survival. Moreover, use of machine learning models allows us to visualize complex clinical datasets to uncover novel clinical relationships.

Cognitive issues in patients with IDH mutant gliomas: from neuroscience to clinical neuropsychology

PURPOSE

The understanding of cognitive symptoms in patients with IDH-Mutant gliomas (IDH-Mut) is rapidly developing. In this article, we summarize the neuroscientific knowledge base regarding the influence of IDH-Mut tumors and their treatment on cognition and provide guidance regarding the management of these symptoms in patients.

METHODS

We performed a review of peer reviewed publications relevant to IDH-Mut glioma and cognitive outcomes and provide an overview of the literature as well as a case example to clarify management strategies.

RESULTS

At the time of presentation, patients with IDH-Mut gliomas have a favorable cognitive profile as compared with those with IDH-wild type (WT) tumors. The relatively low cognitive burden may reflect the slower growth rate of IDH-Mut tumors, which is less disruptive to both local and widespread neural networks. Human connectomic research using a variety of modalities has demonstrated relatively preserved network efficiency in patients with IDH-Mut gliomas as compared with IDH-WT tumors. Risk of cognitive decline from surgery can potentially be mitigated by careful integration of intra-operative mapping. Longer term cognitive risks of tumor treatment, including chemotherapy and radiation, are best managed by instituting neuropsychological assessment as part of the long-term care of patients with IDH-Mutant glioma. A specific timeline for such integrative care is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the relative recency of the IDH-mutation based classification of gliomas, as well as the long time course of this disease, a thoughtful and comprehensive strategy to studying patient outcomes and devising methods of cognitive risk reduction is required.

Foundations of Neuropsychology: Collaborative Care in Neurosurgery

The disciplines of neuropsychology and neurosurgery have a history of partnership that has improved prognoses for patients with neurologic diagnoses that once had poor outcomes. This article outlines the evolution of this relationship and describes the current role that clinical neuropsychology has within a department of neurological surgery across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages of treatment. Understanding the foundations of collaboration between neuropsychology and neurosurgery contextualizes present challenges and future innovations for advancing excellence along the continuum of care for all neurosurgical patients.

Neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background

In addition to poor survival rates, individuals with glioblastoma (GBM) are at risk of neurocognitive impairment due to multiple factors. This study aimed to characterize neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in newly diagnosed GBM patients; and to examine whether neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep, and depressive symptoms influence neurocognitive performance.

Methods

This study was part of a prospective, inception cohort, single-arm exercise intervention in which GBM patients underwent a neuropsychological assessment shortly after diagnosis (median 4 weeks; ie, baseline) and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months later, or until tumor progression. Here, we present baseline data. Forty-five GBM patients (mean age = 55 years) completed objective neurocognitive tests, and self-report measures of neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms.

Results

Compared to normative samples, GBM patients scored significantly lower on all neurocognitive tests, with 34 (76%) patients exhibiting neurocognitive impairment. Specifically, 53% exhibited impairment in memory retention, 51% in executive function, 42% in immediate recall, 41% in verbal fluency, and 24% in attention. There were high rates of clinically elevated sleep disturbance (70%), fatigue (57%), depressive symptoms (16%), and neurobehavioral symptoms (27%). A multivariate regression analysis revealed that depressive symptoms are significantly associated with neurocognitive impairment.

Conclusions

GBM patients are vulnerable to adverse outcomes including neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms shortly after diagnosis, prior to completing chemoradiation. Those with increased depressive symptoms are more likely to demonstrate neurocognitive impairment, highlighting the need for early identification and treatment of depression in this population.

Presurgical predictors of early cognitive outcome after brain tumor resection in glioma patients

Gliomas are commonly characterized by neurocognitive deficits that strongly impact patients' and caregivers' quality of life. Surgical resection is the mainstay of therapy, and it can also cause cognitive impairment. An important clinical problem is whether patients who undergo surgery will show post-surgical cognitive impairment above and beyond that present before surgery. The relevant rognostic factors are largely unknown. This study aims to quantify the cognitive impairment in glioma patients 1-week after surgery and to compare different pre-surgical information (i.e., cognitive performance, tumor volume, grading, and lesion topography) towards predicting early post-surgical cognitive outcome. We retrospectively recruited a sample of N = 47 patients affected by high-grade and low-grade glioma undergoing brain surgery for tumor resection. Cognitive performance was assessed before and immediately after (∼1 week) surgery with an extensive neurocognitive battery. Multivariate linear regression models highlighted the combination of predictors that best explained post-surgical cognitive impairment. The impact of surgery on cognitive functioning was relatively small (i.e., 85% of test scores across the whole sample indicated no decline), and pre-operative cognitive performance was the main predictor of early post-surgical cognitive outcome above and beyond information from tumor topography and volume. In fact, structural lesion information did not significantly improve the accuracy of prediction made from cognitive data before surgery. Our findings suggest that post-surgery neurocognitive deficits are only partially explained by preoperative brain damage. The present results suggest the possibility to make reliable, individualized, and clinically relevant predictions from relatively easy-to-obtain information.

Prognostic validation of a new classification system for extent of resection in glioblastoma: a report of the RANO resect group

BACKGROUND

Terminology to describe extent of resection in glioblastoma is inconsistent across clinical trials. A surgical classification system was previously proposed based upon residual contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor. We aimed to (I) explore the prognostic utility of the classification system and (II) define how much removed non-CE tumor translates into a survival benefit.

METHODS

The international RANO resect group retrospectively searched previously compiled databases from seven neuro-oncological centers in the USA and Europe for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. Clinical and volumetric information from pre- and post-operative MRI were collected.

RESULTS

We collected 1008 patients with newly diagnosed IDHwt glioblastoma. 744 IDHwt glioblastomas were treated with radiochemotherapy per EORTC 26981/22981 (TMZ/RT→TMZ) following surgery. Among these homogenously treated patients, lower absolute residual tumor volumes (in cm 3) were favorably associated with outcome: patients with 'maximal CE resection' (class 2) had superior outcome compared to patients with 'submaximal CE resection' (class 3) or 'biopsy' (class 4). Extensive resection of non-CE tumor (≤5 cm 3 residual non-CE tumor) was associated with better survival among patients with complete CE resection, thus defining class 1 ('supramaximal CE resection'). The prognostic value of the resection classes was retained on multivariate analysis when adjusting for molecular and clinical markers.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed "RANO categories for extent of resection in glioblastoma" are highly prognostic and may serve for stratification within clinical trials. Removal of non-CE tumor beyond the CE tumor borders may translate into additional survival benefit, providing a rationale to explicitly denominate such 'supramaximal CE resection'.

Patient-reported cognitive function before and after glioma surgery

Background

Little is known about the extent to which glioma patients experience subjective changes in cognitive function following surgery. We sought to assess patient-reported cognitive function before and after glioma surgery and explore potential factors associated with cognitive change.

Methods

In a prospective population-based study, patient-reported cognitive function was measured in 182 patients undergoing primary surgery for diffuse glioma (141 high-grade gliomas (HGG) and 41 low-grade gliomas (LGG)) by using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 cognitive function subscale preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Binomial logistic regression models were used to assess factors possibly associated with patient-reported cognitive changes.

Results

In the HGG group, the mean cognitive function score increased from 70.9 (95% 66.6, 75.2) preoperatively to 85.1 (95% CI 81.2, 89.0) (p < 0.001) and 83.3 (95% CI 79.1, 87.6) (p < 0.001) at 1 and 6 months postoperatively, respectively. In the LGG group, the mean score was 80.9 (95% CI 74.4, 87.4) preoperatively and remained stable at postoperative follow-ups. Females reported lower scores than males. At an individual level, both improvement and deterioration in cognitive scores were frequently seen in LGG and HGG patients after surgery. Preoperative use of corticosteroids and large tumor volume were predictors for cognitive improvement at 1 month postoperatively. No predictors were identified for cognitive improvement at 6 months and worsening at 1 and 6 months.

Conclusion

Many glioma patients experience perioperative subjective changes in cognitive function after surgery. At group level, HGG patients reported improved cognitive function after surgery, while LGG patients reported stable cognitive function. Preoperative use of corticosteroids and large tumor volume were independently associated with postoperative improvement.

The burden of a brain tumor: guiding patient centric care in neuro-oncology

PURPOSE

Brain tumor patients report an overwhelming sense of uncertainty when navigating the course of their terminal disease. Historically, organizational experts and/or treating physicians have established neuro-oncology programs. However, given the disease burden and incurable nature of current medical treatments, patient-centric care should be prioritized alongside institutional and academic objectives. Integrating patient perspectives into interdisciplinary programmatic development can improve comprehensive care and empower patients to advocate for their own quality healthcare needs.

METHODS

Data was derived from four focus groups with adult brain tumor patients (N = 15; M_age = 46 years, 53% female). A trained moderator led each 90-min group and posed semi-structured questions regarding patients' care needs throughout their neuro-oncological disease trajectory. Emphasis was placed on quality of life and psychological distress reduction for both patients and their loved ones. Common themes were identified via thematic content analysis using NVivo software. A high inter-rater reliability (M_kappa = 0.92, range= 0.85-0.93) was achieved.

RESULTS

Six distinct themes emerged, where the frequency of each theme ranged from 12.5 to 23.3%. Specifically, patients discussed relational concerns, navigation of interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impacts, emotional responses to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A discussion of themes follows.

CONCLUSIONS

It is imperative that we include the patient perspective in the development of neuro-oncology programs; considering the quality of survival in addition to quantity. Neuro-oncology quality care themes identified were relational concerns, navigating interdisciplinary care, neurobehavioral impact, emotional response to stressors, existential concerns, and caregiver support. A paramount concentration for comprehensive neuro-oncology programs must include patients' quality needs.

Corticosteroids use and neurocognitive functioning in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: evidence from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101

Background

In patients with recurrent glioblastoma, corticosteroids are frequently used to mitigate intracranial pressure and to improve patient neurological functioning. To date, in these patients, no systematic studies have been performed to assess neurocognitive functioning (NCF) in relation to corticosteroid treatment.

Methods

Using baseline data (ie, prior to randomization) of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 26101, we performed regression analysis to assess the predictive value of corticosteroid intake on performance of the EORTC brain tumor clinical trial NCF test battery. The battery is comprised of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWA), and Trail Making Test (A and B).

Results

Out of 321 patients, 148 (46.1%) were not using corticosteroids, and 173 were using dexamethasone (34.3%), methylprednisolone (9.7%), or other corticosteroids (9.9%). Patients on corticosteroids had worse performance on all neurocognitive tests. Regression analyses demonstrated a negative association between corticosteroids use and the HVLT-R free recall score (R² change = 0.034, F change (1, 272) = 13.392, P < .001) and HVLT-R Delayed Recall score (R² change = 0.028, F change (1, 270) = 10.623, P = .002). No statistically significant association was found for HVLT-R Delayed recognition, COWA, TMT part A and TMT part B (P > .05).

Conclusions

Glioblastoma patients prescribed with corticosteroids show poorer memory functions, expressive language, visual-motor scanning speed, and executive functioning than patients not using corticosteroids. Furthermore, we found a negative association between corticosteroid intake and memory functions. The possibility of deleterious effects of corticosteroids on NCF should be considered during clinical decision making.

Pretreatment patient-reported cognitive function in patients with diffuse glioma

Purpose

Cognitive function is frequently assessed with objective neuropsychological tests, but patient-reported cognitive function is less explored. We aimed to investigate the preoperative prevalence of patient-reported cognitive impairment in patients with diffuse glioma compared to a matched reference group and explore associated factors.

Methods

We included 237 patients with diffuse glioma and 474 age- and gender-matched controls from the general population. Patient-reported cognitive function was measured using the cognitive function subscale in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The transformed scale score (0–100) was dichotomized, with a score of ≤ 75 indicating clinically important patient-reported cognitive impairment. Factors associated with preoperative patient-reported cognitive impairment were explored in a multivariable regression analysis.

Results

Cognitive impairment was reported by 49.8% of the diffuse glioma patients and by 23.4% in the age- and gender-matched reference group (p < 0.001). Patients with diffuse glioma had 3.2 times higher odds (95% CI 2.29, 4.58, p < 0.001) for patient-reported cognitive impairment compared to the matched reference group. In the multivariable analysis, large tumor volume, left tumor lateralization, and low Karnofsky Performance Status score were found to be independent predictors for preoperative patient-reported cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that patient-reported cognitive impairment is a common symptom in patients with diffuse glioma pretreatment, especially in patients with large tumor volumes, left tumor lateralization, and low functional levels. Patient-reported cognitive function may provide important information about patients’ subjective cognitive health and disease status and may serve as a complement to or as a screening variable for subsequent objective testing.

Neurocognitive functioning following lung cancer treatment: The PRO-Long Study

•

Lung cancer patients often receive loco-regional radiotherapy and systemic treatment.

•

This may negatively impact neurocognitive functioning (NCF) of certain patients.

•

Patient-reported psychological problems are not correlated with objective NCF.

•

Baseline objective NCF in lung cancer patients may be a predictor for overall survival.

•

More research is needed on the impact of systemic treatment and/or radiotherapy on cognition.

This observational cohort study investigates neurocognitive functioning (NCF) and its associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and patient-reported psychological toxicities in locally-advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients receiving loco-regional radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy. Objective NCF data was collected with six psychometrically validated neurocognitive tests. Subjective NCF was assessed with the cognitive domain of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items. Psychological toxicity data was collected with the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events. Meaningful clinical important differences were determined for changes in NCF. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear models were used to determine statistical significance (p < 0.01).

In total, 50 patients were recruited. At baseline, 13 (26%) patients had an impaired objective NCF. Over time, deterioration was seen in 11% (n = 3), 5% (n = 1) and 6% (n = 1) of patients at 2–3, 6 and 12 months post-treatment. The OS of patients with a normal NCF at baseline was longer than those with an impaired baseline NCF (29.5 vs 17.1 months). No statistical significance has been reached between NCF and OS (p = .353) nor NCF and DFS (p = .251). Objective NCF was not correlated with subjective NCF (p = .193), nor anxiety (p = .504), depression (p = .513), memory problems (p = .813) and concentration problems (p = .813).

Systemic treatment and loco-regional radiotherapy may have a temporarily negative impact on NCF in a small proportion of locally-advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Baseline NCF could be a predictor for OS.

Preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery

PURPOSE

To identify the preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment after brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated before brain tumor surgery and after 3 months. The cognitive evaluation included MOCA for the general cognitive status, TMT for attention and executive functions, ROWL-IR and ROWL-DR for memory, and the F-A-S for verbal fluency. Anxiety, depression, social support, resilience, personality, disability, and quality of life were evaluated with the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): HADS, OSS-3, RS-14, TIPI, WHODAS-12, and EORTC-QLQ C30. Functional status was measured with KPS. Regression analyses were performed to identify preoperative nonmedical predictors of functional impairment; PROMs and cognitive tests were compared with the normative values.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were enrolled (64 glioma; 85 meningioma). Increasing age, lower education, higher disability, and lower ROWL-DR scores were predictors of functional impairment in glioma patients while higher TMT scores and disability were predictors in meningioma patients. In multiple regression, only a worse performance in TMT remains a predictor in meningioma patients. Cognitive tests were not significantly worse than normative values, while psychosocial functioning was impaired.

CONCLUSION

TMT could be used in the preoperative evaluation and as a potential predictor in the research field on outcome predictors. Psychosocial functioning should be studied further and considered in a clinical context to identify who need major support and to plan tailored interventions.

Association of Neurological Impairment on the Relative Benefit of Maximal Extent of Resection in Chemoradiation-Treated Newly Diagnosed Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-Type Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Increases in the extent of resection of both contrast-enhanced (CE) and non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) tissue are associated with substantial survival benefits in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma. The fact, however, remains that these lesions exist within the framework of complex neural circuitry subserving cognition, movement, and behavior, all of which affect the ultimate survival outcome. The prognostic significance of the interplay between CE and NCE cytoreduction and neurological morbidity is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To identify a clinically homogenous population of 228 patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma, all of whom underwent maximal safe resection of CE and NCE tissue and adjuvant chemoradiation. We then set out to delineate the competing interactions between resection of CE and NCE tissue and postoperative neurological impairment with respect to overall survival.

METHODS

Nonparametric multivariate models of survival were generated via recursive partitioning to provide a clinically intuitive framework for the prognostication and surgical management of such patients.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that the presence of a new postoperative neurological impairment was the key factor in predicting survival outcomes across the entire cohort. Patients older than 60 yr who suffered from at least one new impairment had the worst survival outcome regardless of extent of resection (median of 11.6 mo), whereas those who did not develop a new impairment had the best outcome (median of 28.4 mo) so long as all CE tissue was resected.

CONCLUSION

Our data provide novel evidence for management strategies that prioritize safe and complete resection of CE tissue.

Initial cognitive impairment predicts shorter survival of patients with glioblastoma

OBJECTIVES

Seizures as presenting symptom of glioblastoma (GBM) are known to predict prolonged survival, whereas the clinical impact of other initial symptoms is less known. Our main objective was to evaluate the influence of different presenting symptoms on survival in a clinical setting. We also assessed lead times, tumour size and localization.

METHODS

Medical records of 189 GBM patients were reviewed regarding the first medical appointment, presenting symptom/s, date of diagnostic radiology and survival. Tumour size, localization and treatment data were retrieved. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and Mann-Whitney U test. Cox regression was used for risk estimation.

RESULTS

Cognitive impairment as the initial symptom was often misinterpreted in primary health care leading to a delayed diagnosis. Initial global symptoms (66% of all patients) were associated with reduced survival compared to no global symptoms (median 8.4 months vs. 12.6 months). Those with the most common cognitive dysfunctions: change of behaviour, memory impairment and/or disorientation had a reduced median survival to 6.4 months. In contrast, seizures (32%) were associated with longer survival (median 11.2 months vs. 8.3 months). Global symptoms were associated with larger tumours than seizures, but tumour size had no linear association with survival. The setting of the first medical appointment was evenly distributed between primary health care and emergency units.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GBM presenting with cognitive symptoms are challenging to identify, have larger tumours and reduced survival. In contrast, epileptic seizures as the first symptom are associated with longer survival and smaller tumours.

Genetic modulation of longitudinal change in neurocognitive function among adult glioma patients

PURPOSE

Impaired neurocognitive function (NCF) is extremely common in patients with higher grade primary brain tumor. We previously reported evidence of genetic variants associated with NCF in glioma patients prior to treatment. However, little is known about the effect of genetic variants on NCF decline after adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Patients (N = 102) completed longitudinal NCF assessments that included measures of verbal memory, processing speed, and executive function. Testing was conducted in the postoperative period with an average follow up interval of 1.3 years. We examined polymorphisms in 580 genes related to five pathways (inflammation, DNA repair, metabolism, cognitive, and telomerase).

RESULTS

Five polymorphisms were associated with longitudinal changes in processing speed and 14 polymorphisms with executive function. Change in processing speed was strongly associated with MCPH1 rs17631450 (P = 2.2 × 10^-7) and CCDC26 rs7005206 (P = 9.3 × 10^-7) in the telomerase pathway; while change in executive function was more strongly associated with FANCF rs1514084 (P = 2.9 × 10^-6) in the DNA repair pathway and DAOA rs12428572 (P = 2.4 × 10^-5) in the cognitive pathway. Joint effect analysis found significant genetic-dosage effects for longitudinal changes in processing speed (P_trend = 1.5 × 10^-10) and executive function (P_trend = 2.1 × 10^-11). In multivariable analyses, predictors of NCF decline included progressive disease, lower baseline NCF performance, and more at-risk genetic variants, after adjusting for age, sex, education, tumor location, histology, and disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Our longitudinal analyses revealed that polymorphisms in telomerase, DNA repair, and cognitive pathways are independent predictors of decline in NCF in glioma patients.

Reliability and validity of a novel cognitive self-assessment tool for patients with cancer

Background

Subjective cognitive function is an important outcome measure in oncology. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) is a quality of life (QoL) measure that includes indices of physical, emotional, social, and neurologic aspects of disease but does not measure cognitive function. This study seeks to validate a novel index of cognition derived from the FACT-Br.

Methods

Patients with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses (N = 214) completed neuropsychological evaluation and self-report measures. Nine FACT-Br items regarding cognition were combined to form the FACT-Br-cognitive index (CI). Reliability was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating FACT-Br-CI with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive-8 scales. Discriminant validity was assessed by correlating FACT-Br-CI with other FACT-Br indices and the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories (BDI, BAI). Exploratory analyses evaluated the impact of cognitive performance and disease variables on FACT-Br-CI.

Results

The FACT-Br-CI consisted of a single factor that demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.867) and strong concurrent validity, correlating strongly with PROMIS Cognitive-8 scales (r = 0.675-0.782). The relationship between the FACT-Br-CI and other FACT subscales ranged from moderate to strong (r = 0.372-0.601), as did correlations with measures of depression (BDI, r = -0.621) and anxiety (BAI, r = -0.450). Modest correlations were observed with neuropsychological measures (rs = 0.249-0.300).

Conclusions

The FACT-Br-CI is a reliable and valid measure of self-reported cognition. Studies that included the FACT-Br could be retrospectively analyzed to assess subjective cognitive outcomes, enriching the information from prior research. Integration of the FACT-Br-CI in routine clinical care may be an efficient method of monitoring cognition.

Comprehensive ability evaluation and trend analysis of patients with malignant intracranial tumors in the perisurgery period

INTRODUCTION

Prognostic situations differ in patients with malignant intracranial tumors. We focused on the quality of life, ability of daily living, and cognitive function of patients in the perisurgery period and investigated the correlation between them and the prognosis of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with malignant intracranial tumors admitted to Peking Union Medical College Hospital from May 2018 to August 2020 for surgery were included. The evaluations were performed 6 times in the perisurgery period. The questionnaires for assessment included QLQ-C30, ADL, and so forth.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were included (115 glioma and 50 brain metastases). Patients had their worst performance at the 7-day postsurgical assessment (EORTC QLQ-C30, ADL, HAD-D, Frail Scale, MMSE, MoCA, CSHA-FI, and NANO) and recovered at the 1-month postsurgical assessment (p < .05). Patients with left-sided tumors had significantly worse cognitive function than patients with right-sided tumors before surgery and at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery (p < .05). The scores of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery were used to reflect the prognosis, and the preoperative MoCA, NANO, CCI, CSHA-FI, and HAD score might predict the quality of life and nutrition status after operation.

CONCLUSION

The quality of life and daily living ability of patients with malignant intracranial tumors decreased significantly 7 days after the surgery but recovered 1 month after the surgery. Patients with left hemisphere lesions had a worse cognitive function, while the ADL is associated with short-term prognosis. The comprehensive evaluation of the perisurgical period can indicate the prognosis of patients and further guide clinical decision-making.

An analysis of neurocognitive dysfunction in brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Neurocognitive dysfunction is an important issue in patients with frontal lobe lesions. These patients who may be in good neurological status may succumb to neurocognitive dysfunction, affecting their daily living and hampering the quality of life. This study aims to correlate pre- and post-operative neurocognitive dysfunction in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis of 50 patients of newly-diagnosed frontal lobe tumors of any grade deemed suitable for surgical resection was carried out. All patients underwent neurocognitive testing using frontal assessment battery (FAB), mini mental state examination, and verbal learning and memory test pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

In this study, 22 patients had right frontal lobe lesion, whereas in 24 patients, it was located in the left frontal lobe, and 4 patients had bilateral lesions. Only 12 patients were found to be in good FAB score preoperatively, and all of them had symptom duration of less than 3 months. 1-week postsurgery, 26 patients achieved a good score, which increased to 44 at 3^rd month. Patients who had psychological dysfunction for more than 3 months had average-to-bad preoperative FAB scores, while at 3^rd month postoperatively, only six patients were in average score and none in bad score.

CONCLUSION

Frontal lobe lesion should be kept in mind in patients with neurocognitive dysfunction. FAB is a simple bedside test that should be included in routine neurological examination in daily neurosurgical practice to assess long-term functional outcome in patients with frontal lobe lesions.

Assessment and Management of Cognitive Symptoms in Patients With Brain Tumors

Cognitive symptoms occur in almost all patients with brain tumors at varying points in the disease course. Deficits in neurocognitive function may be caused by the tumor itself, treatment (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy), or other complicating factors (e.g., seizures, fatigue, mood disturbance) and can have a profound effect on functional independence and quality of life. Assessment of neurocognitive function is an important part of comprehensive care of patients with brain tumors. In the neuro-oncology clinic, assessment may include cognitive screening tools and inquiry into subjective cognitive function. Neuropsychological assessment is an important adjunct to identify cognitive symptoms and can be used as an opportunity to intervene through transformative feedback and treatment planning. Preventative measures can be taken to reduce cognitive side effects of treatment, such as awake craniotomies with intraoperative mapping during neurosurgery or prophylactic measures during radiation therapy (e.g., hippocampal avoidance, neuroprotectant treatment with memantine). Rehabilitative therapies, including cognitive rehabilitation and computerized cognitive exercise, are options for managing cognitive problems in an individualized manner. Pharmacotherapy, including use of stimulant medications and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, has shown benefits for patients with brain tumors when tailored to an individual's cognitive profile. Identification and management of co-occurring issues, such as sleep disturbance, fatigue, and depression, can also improve neurocognitive function. There are promising therapies under development that may provide new options for treatment in the future. Integrating careful assessment and treatment of cognition throughout the disease course for patients with brain tumors can improve functional outcomes and quality of life.

Multimodal assessment of disease activity in glioblastoma : A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Assessment of disease activity in glioblastoma (GBM) can be challenging due to several clinical and radiological pitfalls. Besides MRI, FET-PET and neurocognitive assessment (NA) are used in several neuro-oncological centers in order to improve the specificity of response assessment. We performed a retrospective study to investigate whether the assessment by RANO (Response Assessment in NeuroOncology) corresponds to FET-PET imaging and NA results. Moreover, the concordance of RANO with a final recommendation of an interdisciplinary neuro-oncological tumor board recommendation (TBR) was analyzed.

METHODS

We enrolled 25 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed GBM in a pilot study, accounting for 81 multimodal test results. All patients were selected after undergoing consecutive follow-up comprising MRI, FET-PET, and NA with a subsequent TBR. Results were analyzed for correlations between RANO, FET-PET and NA. An additional consistency analysis was performed to elucidate the impact of RANO on decision making.

RESULTS

A highly statistically significant correlation was found between RANO and FET-PET and NA results (all P < 0.01); however, 26% of follow-up tests exhibited inconsistent results in multimodal assessment, among which RANO was only 48% in accordance with the final TBR. The concordance of NA and FET-PET with the final TBR was 67% and 86%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The RANO proved its value in the context of multimodal assessment of disease activity in GBM; however, because the implementation of multimodal assessment showed a considerably high percentage of inconsistent results, further studies are required to investigate the relationship between different assessment techniques, in addition to their overall significance to response rating.

Effects of sulforaphane on cognitive function in patients with frontal brain damage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with frontal brain damage show serious cognitive function deficits, which hamper their quality of life and result in poor clinical outcomes. Preclinical research has shown that sulforaphane can significantly improve spatial localisation and working memory impairment after brain injury. The primary aim of this double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial is to assess the efficacy of sulforaphane for improving cognitive function in patients with frontal brain damage.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Ninety eligible patients will be randomly allocated to an active treatment or a placebo group in a 2:1 ratio. Participants will undergo a series of cognitive and neuropsychiatric tests at baseline (week 0) and after 12 weeks to determine the effect of sulforaphane on cognition. Magnetic resonance spectrum of the brain will be studied using the 3T MRIs of the brain to detect brain metabolites markers, including N-acetyl aspartate, glutamate (Glu), glutathione (GSH) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Blood brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Glu, GSH and GABA levels and gut microbiota will also be assessed over this period. This study will also evaluate long-term outcomes of brain trauma, brain tumours and cerebrovascular disease via exploratory analyses. The primary outcome will be the difference in scores of a battery of cognitive tests after 12 weeks of sulforaphane treatment. The secondary outcomes will be changes in the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, the changes in T1-weighted MRI and resting-state functional MRI findings, and changes in brain and blood metabolic markers and gut microbiota at weeks 0 and 12. We expect that sulforaphane will yield favourable results in treating memory and learning deficits for patients with frontal brain damage. Cognitive functional treatment may also improve brain trauma, brain tumours and cerebrovascular outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics committee of the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No. 2017121019). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on 31 January 2020 (NCT04252261). The protocol version is V.1.0 (20 December 2019).

Impaired neurocognitive function in glioma patients: from pathophysiology to novel intervention strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review succinctly summarizes the recent literature regarding etiological contributors to impaired neurocognitive function (NCF) in adult patients with glioma. A brief overview of intervention and prevention strategies is also provided.

RECENT FINDINGS

A majority of patients with glioma exhibit NCF deficits, most frequently in memory and executive functioning. Impairments are often disabling and associated with reduced quality of life and survival. Cause is multifactorial and includes the tumour itself, treatments received and associated comorbidities. Although modern techniques such as brain mapping, dosing modifications and prophylactic medication aim to improve the NCF outcomes following neurosurgical resection and radiation therapy, a sizeable proportion of patients continue to evidence treatment-related NCF declines related to adverse effects to both local and distributed cerebral networks. Numerous patient and tumour characteristics, including genetic markers and sociodemographic factors, influence the pattern and severity of NCF impairment. Some rehabilitative and pharmacologic approaches show promise in mitigating NCF impairment in this population, though benefits are somewhat modest and larger scale intervention studies are needed.

SUMMARY

Research regarding NCF in patients with glioma has dramatically proliferated, providing insights into the mechanisms underlying impaired NCF and pointing to potential interventions, though further work is needed.

Longitudinal study of cognitive function in glioma patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques and standard chemotherapy

Introduction: Cognitive function is an important outcome measure in patients with brain tumor, providing information about the patient's clinical situation, treatment effects and possible progressive disease. The aim of this longitudinal study was to evaluate effects of the currently used radiation and chemotherapy treatment on cognitive function and to investigate associations between cognitive function at baseline and progression as well as overall survival.Methods: 32 patients newly diagnosed with malignant glioma were evaluated at baseline with CNS Vital Signs (CNS-VS), a computerized standardized neuropsychological test battery, prior to arc-based radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy with Temozolomide. CNS-VS measures the cognitive functions known to be affected in patients with brain tumor, covering nine cognitive domains. Follow-up cognitive evaluations were performed in 26 patients after 3.5 months and in 13 patients 1 year after treatment start.Results: Overall cognitive scores were lower in the studied patient cohort at baseline compared to standardized domain scores. At 3.5 months follow-up cognitive functioning was slightly decreased, but only in 1/9 cognitive domains - visual memory - where significant changes were found compared to baseline test results. Similarly, at 12 months follow-up no significant changes in cognitive test results were seen compared to baseline examination, except for a decrease in the visual memory domain. In relation to early progression, the most significant cognitive deficits were dysfunctional visual memory and low executive functioning at baseline. Low executive function at baseline correlated most significantly with shorter overall survival.Conclusion: The present study suggests that the currently used arc-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy might affect cognitive function less negatively than previously described during treatment and in the first year after treatment in malignant glioma patients. In general, a high cognitive test score at baseline was associated with longer time to progression and with longer survival.

The quality of measurement properties of neurocognitive assessment in brain tumor clinical trials over the last 30 years: a COSMIN checklist-based approach

PURPOSE

To provide an exhaustive review of the neuropsychological examination as conducted in brain tumor clinical trials over the last 30 years and to provide objective ratings about the reliability and suitability of such tests in neurooncological research and clinical practice.

METHODS

Methodologies and tools provided by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) were exploited in order to assess the measurement properties of questionnaires and performance-based instruments used to evaluate cognitive functioning in brain tumor clinical trials from 1997 to 2017.

RESULTS

Twenty-six brain tumor clinical trials were analyzed and an overall set of 10 neuropsychological tests was identified. A list of 24 studies concerning the reliability of such tests was analyzed. Reliability and level of evidence scores for each study and for each test were obtained. The results revealed relevant faults about the quality of measurements and the suitability of the neurocognitive assessment batteries most commonly used in brain tumor clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the cognitive assessment in brain tumor clinical trials should be implemented according to specific endpoints and should be addressed to investigate all the cognitive domains known to be affected by brain tumor and treatment.

Cognitive impairment three months after surgery is an independent predictor of survival time in glioblastoma patients

Purpose

Cognitive functioning is increasingly investigated for its prognostic value in glioblastoma (GBM) patients, but the association of cognitive status during early adjuvant treatment with survival time is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether cognitive performance three months after surgical resection predicted survival time, while using a clinically intuitive time ratio (TR) statistic.

Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with GBM undergoing resection between November 2010 and February 2018 completed computerized cognitive assessment 3 months after surgery with the CNS Vital Signs battery (8 measures). The association of cognitive performance (continuous Z scores and dichotomous impairment status; impaired vs. unimpaired) with survival time was assessed with multivariate Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) models that also included clinical prognostic factors and covariates related to cognitive performances.

Results

114 patients were included in the analyses (median survival time 16.4 months). Of the clinical factors, postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (TR 1.51), surgical (TR 2.20) and non-surgical (TR 1.94) salvage treatment, and pre-surgical tumor volume (cm³, TR 1.003) were significant independent predictors of survival time. Independently of the base model factors and covariates, impairment on Stroop test I and Stroop test III estimated 23% and 26% reduction of survival time (TR 0.77, TR 0.74) respectively, as compared to unimpaired performance.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that impaired performances on tests of executive control and processing speed in the early phase of adjuvant treatment can reflect a worse prognostic outlook rather than an early treatment effect, and their assessment might allow for early refinement of current prognostic stratification.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11060-020-03577-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Longitudinal Analysis of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms as Independent Predictors of Neurocognitive Function in Primary Brain Tumor Patients

PURPOSE

Primary brain tumor patients are vulnerable to depression and anxiety symptoms, which may affect their neurocognitive functioning. We performed a prospective longitudinal analysis to examine the association between depression and anxiety symptoms and domain-specific neurocognitive functioning in primary brain tumor patients receiving radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

On a prospective trial, 54 primary brain tumor patients receiving RT underwent comprehensive neurocognitive evaluation at baseline (pre-RT), and 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. Neurocognitive assessments measured attention/processing speed, verbal and visuospatial memory, and executive functioning, including Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System Trail-Making Test (DKEFS-TMT), DKEFS Verbal Fluency, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. Depression and anxiety symptoms were also assessed at each time point with Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories (BDI-II and BAI), respectively. Higher scores reflect more numerous or severe depression or anxiety symptoms. Univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between BDI-II and BAI scores and domain-specific neurocognitive scores over time, controlling for pre-existing depression or anxiety disorders and other patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

RESULTS

Higher BAI scores were associated with worse attention and processing speed in univariable analyses: DKEFS-TMT visual scanning (P = .003), number sequencing (P = .011), and letter sequencing (P <.001). On multivariable analyses, these associations remained significant (all P ≤ .01). Higher BDI-II scores were also associated with poorer attention/processing speed (DKEFS-TMT Letter Sequencing) in univariable (P = .002) and multivariable (P = .013) models. Higher BAI scores were associated with worse visuospatial memory (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Delayed Recall) on univariable (P = .012) but not multivariable analyses (P = .383). Similarly, higher BDI-II scores were associated with poorer executive functioning (DKEFS Verbal Fluency Category Switching) on univariable (P = .031) but not multivariable analyses (P = .198).

CONCLUSIONS

Among primary brain tumor patients receiving RT, increased depression and anxiety were independently associated with worsened neurocognition, particularly in attention/processing speed. Depression and anxiety symptoms should be controlled for in prospective clinical trials and managed in the clinical setting to optimize neurocognitive functioning.

Presurgical Identification of Patients With Glioblastoma at Risk for Cognitive Impairment at 3-Month Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Pre- and postoperative cognitive deficits have repeatedly been demonstrated in patients with glioblastoma (GBM).

OBJECTIVE

To identify presurgical risk factors that facilitate the identification of GBM patients at risk for postoperative cognitive impairment.

METHODS

Patients underwent neuropsychological assessment using Central Nervous System Vital Signs 1 d before (T0) and 3 mo after surgery (T3). Patients’ standardized scores on 7 cognitive domains were compared to a normative sample using one-sample z tests. Reliable change indices with correction for practice effects were calculated to assess cognitive changes in individual patients over time. Logistic regression models were performed to assess presurgical sociodemographic, clinical, psychological, and cognitive risk factors for postoperative cognitive impairments.

RESULTS

At T0, 208 patients were assessed, and 136 patients were retested at T3. Patients showed significantly lower performance both prior to and 3 mo after surgery on all cognitive domains compared to healthy controls. Improvements and declines over time occurred respectively in 11% to 32% and 6% to 26% of the GBM patients over the domains. The regression models showed that low preoperative cognitive performance posits a significant risk factor for postoperative cognitive impairment on all domains, and female sex was a risk factor for postoperative impairments in Visual Memory.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated preoperative cognitive risk factors that enable the identification of GBM patients who are at risk for cognitive impairment 3 mo after surgery. This information can help to inform patients and clinicians at an early stage, and emphasizes the importance of recognizing, assessing, and actively dealing with cognitive functioning in the clinical management of GBM patients.

Sensitivity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in screening for cognitive impairment in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma

INTRODUCTION

Cognitive impairment is frequent in patients with high-grade glioma and requires cognitive follow-up. Cognitive screening tools such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) have been used to assess cognition in these patients. Here we assessed the sensitivity of the MoCA in screening for cognitive impairment in a cohort of 156 patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma, after surgery and before radiochemotherapy.

METHODS

We assessed cognitive performance with the MoCA and a neuropsychological battery. Cognitive scores were analyzed in terms of a previously validated framework designed to control false positives and data for 1003 control participants from the GRECOGVASC study. After comparison of performance on the tests, we used stepwise logistic regression to produce a cognitive summary score from the neuropsychological battery. Then we analyzed sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Both raw and adjusted MoCA scores showed only moderate sensitivity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.759 (95% CI 0.703-0.815) for the raw score and 0.788 (95% CI 0.734-0.842) for the adjusted score. Optimal discrimination was obtained with a raw score ≤ 25 (sensitivity: 0.526; specificity: 0.832; positive predictive value: 0.2; negative predictive value: 0.96) and an adjusted score - 0.603 (sensitivity: 0.716; specificity: 0.768; positive predictive value: 0.24; negative predictive value: 0.96).

CONCLUSION

The moderate sensitivity of MoCA indicates that it is not a suitable screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment in patients with newly-diagnosed high-grade glioma.

Pretreatment Geriatric Assessments of Elderly Patients with Glioma: Development and Implications

Glioma is the most frequent primary brain tumor affecting adults, and the most lethal type is glioblastoma (GBM); currently, the available therapies only provide palliation. The treatments for low-grade glioma (LGG) include neurosurgical resection, watchful waiting, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, while the therapeutic strategies for high-grade glioma (HGG), particularly in elderly patients, have evolved to include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted monotherapy based on the characteristics of the investigated patients. Proper assessments aiming to predict and achieve the most satisfying prognosis among patients prior to surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy help summarize the pretreatment characteristics of patients, providing doctors comprehensive information to consider while determining whether the patients could benefit from ongoing treatments and deciding the proper treatment strategy for subsequent phases. This article aims to rigorously review the most recent evidence and discuss current mainstream assessments before the initiation of proper treatments for glioma, thus highlighting the potential necessity of pretreatment assessments.

Influence of Residual Disease Following Surgical Resection in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma on Clinical, Neurocognitive, and Patient Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The influence of subtotal resection (STR) on neurocognitive function (NCF), quality of life, and symptom burden in glioblastoma is unknown. If bevacizumab preferentially benefits patients with STR is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine these uncertainties.

METHODS

NCF and patient reported outcomes (PRO) were prospectively collected in NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825. Changes in NCF and PRO measures from baseline to prespecified times were examined by Wilcoxon test, and mixed effects longitudinal modeling, to assess differences between patients who received STR vs gross-total resection. Changes were also compared among STR patients on 0825 receiving placebo vs bevacizumab to assess for a preferential therapeutic effect. Overall survival between STR and gross-total resection patients was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 427 patients were eligible with STR present in 37%. At baseline, patients with STR had worse NCF, worse MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Neurological Factor ratings (P = .004), and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (P = .002). Longitudinal multivariate analysis associated STR with worse NCF (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Delayed Recognition [P = .048], Trail Making Test Part A [P = .035], and Controlled Oral Word Association [P = .049]). One hundred eighty-three STR patients from 0825 were analyzed (89 bevacizumab, 94 placebo); bevacizumab failed to demonstrate improvement in select NCF or PRO measures.

CONCLUSION

STR patients had worse NCF and PROs before therapy. During adjuvant therapy, STR patients had worse objective NCF, despite accounting for tumor location. STR did not result in a detriment to OS. The addition of bevacizumab did not preferentially improve PRO or NCF outcomes in STR patients.

Assessing Discrepancies in Neurocognitive and Patient-Reported Measures of Brain Tumor Survivors

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between performance-based neurocognitive and patient-reported cognitive function tests and identify characteristics that may explain observed discrepancies as a means to advance intervention development.

SAMPLE & SETTING

40 adults diagnosed with a primary brain tumor (PBT) (high-grade, n = 35) were recruited from two academic neuro-oncology clinics in North Carolina.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Eligibility included a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 or greater, having completed cancer treatment, and having tumor stability. Participants completed performance-based neurocognitive and patient-reported cognitive function, demographic, and symptom assessment tests at one time point.

RESULTS

Neurocognitive impairments included executive control, memory, and attention. Age, time since diagnosis, and tumor- or treatment-specific variables were not associated with neurocognitive or patient-reported cognitive function. Those reporting worse cognitive impairment tended also to report greater severity of PBT-specific and depressive symptoms.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Patient-reported cognitive concerns warrant additional assessment for potential interventions to maintain function.

The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) Scale as an Assessment Tool for Survival in Patients With Primary Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale is a standardized objective metric designed to measure neurological function in neuro-oncology. Current neuroradiological evaluation guidelines fail to use specific clinical criteria for progression.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the NANO scale was a reliable assessment tool in glioblastoma (GBM) patients and whether it correlated to survival.

METHODS

Our group performed a retrospective review of all patients with newly diagnosed GBM from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, at our institution. We applied the NANO scale, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale, Macdonald criteria, and the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria to patients at the time of diagnosis as well as at 3, 6, and 12 mo.

RESULTS

Initial NANO score was correlated with overall survival at time of presentation. NANO progression was correlated with decreased survival in patients at 6 and 12 mo. A decrease in KPS was associated with survival at 3 and 6 mo, an increase in ECOG score was associated only at 3 mo, and radiological evaluation (RANO and Macdonald) was correlated at 3 and 6 mo. Only the NANO scale was associated with patient survival at 1 yr. NANO progression was the only metric that was linked to decreased overall survival when compared to RANO and Macdonald at 6 and 12 mo.

CONCLUSION

The NANO scale is specific to neuro-oncology and can be used to assess patients with glioma. This retrospective analysis demonstrates the usefulness of the NANO scale in glioblastoma.

Neurocognitive Function in Adult Cancer Patients

Impaired neurocognitive function is an increasingly recognized morbidity in patients who have cancer. Cancer treatments, psychosocial stressors, and the malignancy itself can alter brain function. The mechanisms by which this occurs are under active investigation. Although there is a growing appreciation of its prevalence and causes, there remain limited therapeutic options for the treatment of neurocognitive dysfunction in this population. A persistent scientific and clinical effort to understand its mechanisms and impact is critical to the care of oncology patients.

Predicting disease progression in high-grade glioma with neuropsychological parameters: the value of personalized longitudinal assessment

PURPOSE

Progressive disease in patients with high-grade glioma may be reflected in cognitive decline. However, the cognitive functions most sensitive to progression may differ between patients. We investigated whether decline on a personalized selection of tests predicted progressive disease according to RANO criteria in high-grade glioma patients.

METHODS

Starting one day before surgery, patients underwent neuropsychological assessment every three months during standard treatment and clinical follow-up. We first made a personalized selection of three tests that showed the highest Reliable Change Index (RCI) values, i.e., most positive change, at the first post-surgical assessment for each patient. In subsequent follow up, a decline of RCI ≤ - 1 on at least two of the three tests in the selection was considered cognitive decline. We performed a discrete Cox proportional hazards model including a time-dependent coefficient cognitive decline (vs. stability) and covariate age to predict progressive disease.

RESULTS

Twenty five patients were included. Cognitive decline on the personalized test selection preceded or had occurred by the time progression was established in 9/15 patients with RANO confirmed progressive disease (60%). Decline was absent in 8/10 patients (80%) with stable disease during participation. The independent hazard ratio for progression in case of cognitive decline was 5.05 (p < 0.01) compared to stable performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Using only three patient-specific neuropsychological tests, we found a fivefold increased chance of disease progression in case of cognitive decline as compared to stable performance. Brief, patient-tailored cognitive assessment may be a noninvasive addition to disease monitoring without overburdening patients and clinical care.

Longitudinal association of subjective prospective and retrospective memory and depression among patients with glioma

PURPOSE

This study investigated the levels of depression, subjective prospective memory (PM), and subjective retrospective memory (RM) among Chinese glioma patients and explored the bi-directional relationships between depression and memory impairment, including subjective PM and RM.

METHODS

Seventy-one participants with glioma were assessed for depression, PM, and RM at two time points (Time 1: within 48 h of being hospitalized; Time 2: two weeks after surgery). A cross-lagged path analysis was conducted to examine the bi-directional relationships between depression and memory.

MAIN RESULTS

Depression at T1 predicted memory impairment total scores (β = 0.22, P = 0.011) and RM (β = 0.29, P < 0.001) at T2. However, depression at TI could not predict PM at T2 (β = 0.15, P = 0.090). Memory, whether PM or RM, at T1 could not predict depression at T2 (β = 0.07, P = 0.497; β = 0.00, P = 0.978; β = 0.06, P = 0.321).

CONCLUSIONS

Depression can affect RM memory impairment among glioma patients. Oncology nurses should preoperatively screen for depression in glioma patients to identify high-risk groups, for whom emotional interventions and memory training should be carried out to reduce postoperative RM memory impairment.

Monitoring of Neurocognitive Function in the Care of Patients with Brain Tumors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A detailed characterization of the nature of neurocognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors is provided, as well as considerations for clinical practice regarding neuropsychological assessment throughout the disease course.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neurocognitive impairment is common in patients with brain tumors and may result from the tumor itself, as a consequence of treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, or in association with supportive care medications (e.g., anticonvulsant and pain medications). Serial surveillance of neurocognitive functioning in this population can facilitate medical decision-making and inform recommendations to improve patient daily functioning and quality of life. Neuropsychological assessment is increasingly recognized as a critical component of the multidisciplinary care of patients with brain tumors and has already had practice-changing effects. Further understanding of genetic risk factors for neurocognitive decline along with the development of novel assessment and intervention strategies may further enhance functioning and general well-being in this patient population.

The added value of health-related quality of life as a prognostic indicator of overall survival and progression-free survival in glioma patients: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Prognostic value of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data may be important to inform patients in clinical practice and to guide clinical decision-making. Our study investigated the added prognostic value of HRQoL for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a large heterogeneous sample of glioma patients, besides known prognostic factors.

METHODS

We included individual baseline data from previously published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in glioma patients in which HRQoL was assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BN20 questionnaires. Multivariable Cox regression models (stratified for newly diagnosed versus recurrent disease) were constructed, first with clinical variables (age, sex, tumour type, performance status, allocated treatment and extent of resection) only and subsequently with HRQoL variables added, separately for OS and PFS. The added prognostic value of HRQoL was calculated using C-indices.

RESULTS

Baseline HRQoL and clinical data from 15 RCTs were included, comprising 5217 patients. In the model including both clinical and HRQoL variables, better cognitive and role functioning and less motor dysfunction were independently associated with longer OS, whereas better role and cognitive functioning, less nausea and vomiting and more appetite loss were independently associated with prolonged PFS. However, C-indices indicated only a small prognostic improvement of the models for OS and PFS when adding HRQoL to the clinical prognostic variables (+1.1% for OS and +.7% for PFS).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that several baseline HRQoL variables are independently prognostic for OS and PFS, yet the added value of HRQoL to the known clinical prognostic variables was small.

Management for Different Glioma Subtypes: Are All Low-Grade Gliomas Created Equal?

Following the identification of key molecular alterations that provided superior prognostication and led to the updated 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumor Classification, the understanding of glioma behavior has rapidly evolved. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 are present in the majority of adult grade 2 and 3 gliomas, and when used in conjunction with 1p/19q codeletion for classification, the prognostic distinction between grade 2 versus grade 3 is diminished. As such, the previously often used term of "low-grade glioma," which referred to grade 2 gliomas, has now been replaced by the phrase "lower-grade glioma" to encompass both grade 2 and 3 tumors. Additional molecular characterization is ongoing to even further classify this heterogeneous group of tumors. With such a colossal shift in the understanding of lower-grade gliomas, management of disease is being redefined in the setting of emerging molecular-genetic biomarkers. In this article, we review recent progress and future directions regarding the surgical, radiotherapeutic, chemotherapeutic, and long-term management of adult lower-grade gliomas.

A systematic review of cognitive function in patients with glioblastoma undergoing surgery

Background

Patients with glioblastoma (GB) are more likely to suffer cognitive deficits with poor quality of life as compared with lower-grade glioma patient groups, for whom cognition research is plentiful. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the cognitive function of patients with GB before and after surgery.

Methods

This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO. PubMed and EMBASE searches were performed, most recently March 15, 2018. Inclusion criteria were adult patients, histologically confirmed GB, and cognitive tests conducted before and/or after surgery. Screening and data extraction were carried out independently by 2 authors.

Results

A total of 512 abstracts were screened. Nineteen studies were included with 902 participants, of whom only 423 had histologically confirmed GB. Only 11 studies tested cognitive function both before and after surgery. A total of 114 different cognitive tests were used. The most common test was used in only 9 studies; 82 tests were used only once. Follow-up time ranged from 1 week to 16 months with extremely high dropout rates. Eighteen of 19 studies reported cognitive deficits in their samples, with prevalence ranging from 22% to 100% (median 64%, interquartile range 42%). Only 1/11 longitudinal studies reported normal cognitive function, 3/11 reported initial deficits with improvement after surgery, 3/11 reported static deficits, and 4/11 reported deterioration.

Conclusion

There is a consistently high risk of cognitive deficit for patients with GB undergoing surgery. The included studies showed marked heterogeneity in study design, case-mix of included diagnoses, and the type and timing of cognitive tests used. We highlight considerations for the design of future studies to avoid such bias.

Treatment of Radiation-Induced Cognitive Decline in Adult Brain Tumor Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with either primary or metastatic brain tumors quite often have cognitive impairment. Maintaining cognitive function is important to brain tumor patients and a decline in cognitive function is generally accompanied by a decline in functional independence and performance status. Cognitive decline can be a result of tumor progression, depression/anxiety, fatigue/sleep dysfunction, or the treatments they have received. It is our opinion that providers treating brain tumor patients should obtain pre-treatment and serial cognitive testing in their patients and offer mitigating and therapeutic interventions when appropriate. They should also support cognition-focused clinical trials.

Hypoxia-induced EPHB2 promotes invasive potential of glioblastoma

EphB2, a receptor tyrosine kinase for ephrin ligands, is overexpressed in various cancers and plays an important role in tumor progression. EPHB2 promotes endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and elicits associated pathologic characteristics of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) such as invasion and migration. However, the mechanisms of the EPHB2 regulatory network in glioma remain enigmatic. Here, we report that EPHB2 is epigenetically overexpressed in hypoxia, a condition highly prevalent in malignancy. Furthermore, HIF-2α is required for EPHB2 stabilization by hypoxia. Lastly, we discovered that the overexpression of EPHB2 promotes GBM invasion by the phosphorylation of paxillin in hypoxia. These findings establish the HIF-2α-EPHB2-paxillin axis as a regulatory mechanism of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.