1
|
Weller J, Potthoff AL, Zeyen T, Schaub C, Duffy C, Schneider M, Herrlinger U. Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma. Mol Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38899374 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Weller
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Zeyen
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Cathrina Duffy
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Department of Neurooncology, Center for Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shikalov A, Koman I, Kogan NM. Targeted Glioma Therapy-Clinical Trials and Future Directions. Pharmaceutics 2024; 16:100. [PMID: 38258110 PMCID: PMC10820492 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common type of glioma, with a median survival of 14.6 months post-diagnosis. Understanding the molecular profile of such tumors allowed the development of specific targeted therapies toward GBM, with a major role attributed to tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Targeted therapeutics are drugs that work by specific binding to GBM-specific or overexpressed markers on the tumor cellular surface and therefore contain a recognition moiety linked to a cytotoxic agent, which produces an antiproliferative effect. In this review, we have summarized the available information on the targeted therapeutics used in clinical trials of GBM and summarized current obstacles and advances in targeted therapy concerning specific targets present in GBM tumor cells, outlined efficacy endpoints for major classes of investigational drugs, and discussed promising strategies towards an increase in drug efficacy in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Natalya M. Kogan
- Department of Molecular Biology, Institute of Personalized and Translational Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel; (A.S.); (I.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghanem P, Fatteh M, Kamson DO, Balan A, Chang M, Tao J, Blakeley J, Canzoniero J, Grossman SA, Marrone K, Schreck KC, Anagnostou V. Druggable genomic landscapes of high-grade gliomas. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1254955. [PMID: 38143440 PMCID: PMC10749203 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1254955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the putatively targetable genomic landscape of high-grade gliomas, the long-term survival benefit of genomically-tailored targeted therapies remains discouraging. Methods Using glioblastoma (GBM) as a representative example of high-grade gliomas, we evaluated the clonal architecture and distribution of hotspot mutations in 388 GBMs from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Mutations were matched with 54 targeted therapies, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of drug biochemical properties in reference to the drug's clinical efficacy in high-grade gliomas. We then assessed clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with high-grade gliomas with targetable mutations reviewed at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board (JH MTB; n = 50). Results Among 1,156 sequence alterations evaluated, 28.6% represented hotspots. While the frequency of hotspot mutations in GBM was comparable to cancer types with actionable hotspot alterations, GBMs harbored a higher fraction of subclonal mutations that affected hotspots (7.0%), compared to breast cancer (4.9%), lung cancer (4.4%), and melanoma (1.4%). In investigating the biochemical features of targeted therapies paired with recurring alterations, we identified a trend toward higher lipid solubility and lower IC50 in GBM cell lines among drugs with clinical efficacy. The drugs' half-life, molecular weight, surface area and binding to efflux transporters were not associated with clinical efficacy. Among the JH MTB cohort of patients with IDH1 wild-type high-grade gliomas who received targeted therapies, trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib conferred radiographic partial response in 75% of patients harboring BRAF or NF1 actionable mutations. Cabozantinib conferred radiographic partial response in two patients harboring a MET and a PDGFRA/KDR amplification. Patients with IDH1 wild-type gliomas that harbored actionable alterations who received genotype-matched targeted therapy had longer progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS; 7.37 and 14.72 respectively) than patients whose actionable alterations were not targeted (2.83 and 4.2 months respectively). Conclusion While multiple host, tumor and drug-related features may limit the delivery and efficacy of targeted therapies for patients with high-grade gliomas, genotype-matched targeted therapies confer favorable clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to generate more data on the impact of biochemical features of targeted therapies on their clinical efficacy for high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Ghanem
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Maria Fatteh
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David Olayinka Kamson
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Archana Balan
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Michael Chang
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jessica Tao
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jaishri Blakeley
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jenna Canzoniero
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Stuart A. Grossman
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristen Marrone
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Karisa C. Schreck
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Valsamo Anagnostou
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- The Johns Hopkins Molecular Tumor Board, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dewdney B, Jenkins MR, Best SA, Freytag S, Prasad K, Holst J, Endersby R, Johns TG. From signalling pathways to targeted therapies: unravelling glioblastoma's secrets and harnessing two decades of progress. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:400. [PMID: 37857607 PMCID: PMC10587102 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01637-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma, a rare, and highly lethal form of brain cancer, poses significant challenges in terms of therapeutic resistance, and poor survival rates for both adult and paediatric patients alike. Despite advancements in brain cancer research driven by a technological revolution, translating our understanding of glioblastoma pathogenesis into improved clinical outcomes remains a critical unmet need. This review emphasises the intricate role of receptor tyrosine kinase signalling pathways, epigenetic mechanisms, and metabolic functions in glioblastoma tumourigenesis and therapeutic resistance. We also discuss the extensive efforts over the past two decades that have explored targeted therapies against these pathways. Emerging therapeutic approaches, such as antibody-toxin conjugates or CAR T cell therapies, offer potential by specifically targeting proteins on the glioblastoma cell surface. Combination strategies incorporating protein-targeted therapy and immune-based therapies demonstrate great promise for future clinical research. Moreover, gaining insights into the role of cell-of-origin in glioblastoma treatment response holds the potential to advance precision medicine approaches. Addressing these challenges is crucial to improving outcomes for glioblastoma patients and moving towards more effective precision therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Dewdney
- Cancer Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
- Centre For Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
| | - Misty R Jenkins
- Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Sarah A Best
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
- Personalised Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
| | - Saskia Freytag
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
- Personalised Oncology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
| | - Krishneel Prasad
- Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Jeff Holst
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | - Raelene Endersby
- Cancer Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
- Centre For Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Terrance G Johns
- Cancer Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia
- Centre For Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akshintala S, Sundby RT, Bernstein D, Glod JW, Kaplan RN, Yohe ME, Gross AM, Derdak J, Lei H, Pan A, Dombi E, Palacio-Yance I, Herrera KR, Miettinen MM, Chen HX, Steinberg SM, Helman LJ, Mascarenhas L, Widemann BC, Navid F, Shern JF, Heske CM. Phase I trial of Ganitumab plus Dasatinib to Cotarget the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Receptor and Src Family Kinase YES in Rhabdomyosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3329-3339. [PMID: 37398992 PMCID: PMC10529967 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Antibodies against insulin-like growth factor (IGF) type 1 receptor have shown meaningful but transient tumor responses in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The SRC family member YES has been shown to mediate IGF type 1 receptor (IGF-1R) antibody acquired resistance, and cotargeting IGF-1R and YES resulted in sustained responses in murine RMS models. We conducted a phase I trial of the anti-IGF-1R antibody ganitumab combined with dasatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting YES, in patients with RMS (NCT03041701). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with relapsed/refractory alveolar or embryonal RMS and measurable disease were eligible. All patients received ganitumab 18 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. Dasatinib dose was 60 mg/m2/dose (max 100 mg) oral once daily [dose level (DL)1] or 60 mg/m2/dose (max 70 mg) twice daily (DL2). A 3+3 dose escalation design was used, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined on the basis of cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). RESULTS Thirteen eligible patients, median age 18 years (range 8-29) enrolled. Median number of prior systemic therapies was 3; all had received prior radiation. Of 11 toxicity-evaluable patients, 1/6 had a DLT at DL1 (diarrhea) and 2/5 had a DLT at DL2 (pneumonitis, hematuria) confirming DL1 as MTD. Of nine response-evaluable patients, one had a confirmed partial response for four cycles, and one had stable disease for six cycles. Genomic studies from cell-free DNA correlated with disease response. CONCLUSIONS The combination of dasatinib 60 mg/m2/dose daily and ganitumab 18 mg/kg every 2 weeks was safe and tolerable. This combination had a disease control rate of 22% at 5 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srivandana Akshintala
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - R. Taylor Sundby
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Donna Bernstein
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - John W. Glod
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rosandra N. Kaplan
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Marielle E. Yohe
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
- Laboratory of Cell and Developmental Signaling, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Frederick, Maryland
| | - Andrea M. Gross
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Joanne Derdak
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Haiyan Lei
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alexander Pan
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Eva Dombi
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Isabel Palacio-Yance
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kailey R. Herrera
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Markku M. Miettinen
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Helen X. Chen
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Seth M. Steinberg
- Biostatistics and Data Management, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lee J. Helman
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- The Osteosarcoma Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Leo Mascarenhas
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brigitte C. Widemann
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Fariba Navid
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jack F. Shern
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christine M. Heske
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muzyka L, Goff NK, Choudhary N, Koltz MT. Systematic Review of Molecular Targeted Therapies for Adult-Type Diffuse Glioma: An Analysis of Clinical and Laboratory Studies. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10456. [PMID: 37445633 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common brain tumor in adults, and molecularly targeted therapies to treat gliomas are becoming a frequent topic of investigation. The current state of molecular targeted therapy research for adult-type diffuse gliomas has yet to be characterized, particularly following the 2021 WHO guideline changes for classifying gliomas using molecular subtypes. This systematic review sought to characterize the current state of molecular target therapy research for adult-type diffuse glioma to better inform scientific progress and guide next steps in this field of study. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were queried for study design, subject (patients, human cell lines, mice, etc.), type of tumor studied, molecular target, respective molecular pathway, and details pertaining to the molecular targeted therapy-namely the modality, dose, and duration of treatment. A total of 350 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 52 of these were clinical studies, 190 were laboratory studies investigating existing molecular therapies, and 108 were laboratory studies investigating new molecular targets. Further, a total of 119 ongoing clinical trials are also underway, per a detailed query on clinicaltrials.gov. GBM was the predominant tumor studied in both ongoing and published clinical studies as well as in laboratory analyses. A few studies mentioned IDH-mutant astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas. The most common molecular targets in published clinical studies and clinical trials were protein kinase pathways, followed by microenvironmental targets, immunotherapy, and cell cycle/apoptosis pathways. The most common molecular targets in laboratory studies were also protein kinase pathways; however, cell cycle/apoptosis pathways were the next most frequent target, followed by microenvironmental targets, then immunotherapy pathways, with the wnt/β-catenin pathway arising in the cohort of novel targets. In this systematic review, we examined the current evidence on molecular targeted therapy for adult-type diffuse glioma and discussed its implications for clinical practice and future research. Ultimately, published research falls broadly into three categories-clinical studies, laboratory testing of existing therapies, and laboratory identification of novel targets-and heavily centers on GBM rather than IDH-mutant astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma. Ongoing clinical trials are numerous in this area of research as well and follow a similar pattern in tumor type and targeted pathways as published clinical studies. The most common molecular targets in all study types were protein kinase pathways. Microenvironmental targets were more numerous in clinical studies, whereas cell cycle/apoptosis were more numerous in laboratory studies. Immunotherapy pathways are on the rise in all study types, and the wnt/β-catenin pathway is increasingly identified as a novel target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan Muzyka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Nicolas K Goff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Nikita Choudhary
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Michael T Koltz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1501 Red River Street, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kalita O, Kazda T, Reguli S, Jancalek R, Fadrus P, Slachta M, Pospisil P, Krska L, Vrbkova J, Hrabalek L, Smrcka M, Lipina R. Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092530. [PMID: 37173996 PMCID: PMC10177480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Kalita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Science, Faculty of Humanities, T. Bata University in Zlin, Stefanikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stefan Reguli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Pekarska 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fadrus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Slachta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Krska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Vrbkova
- Institute of Molecular and Translate Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Hnevotinska 133/5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Lumir Hrabalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Lipina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beyond Imaging and Genetic Signature in Glioblastoma: Radiogenomic Holistic Approach in Neuro-Oncology. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123205. [PMID: 36551961 PMCID: PMC9775324 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a malignant brain tumor exhibiting rapid and infiltrative growth, with less than 10% of patients surviving over 5 years, despite aggressive and multimodal treatments. The poor prognosis and the lack of effective pharmacological treatments are imputable to a remarkable histological and molecular heterogeneity of GBM, which has led, to date, to the failure of precision oncology and targeted therapies. Identification of molecular biomarkers is a paradigm for comprehensive and tailored treatments; nevertheless, biopsy sampling has proved to be invasive and limited. Radiogenomics is an emerging translational field of research aiming to study the correlation between radiographic signature and underlying gene expression. Although a research field still under development, not yet incorporated into routine clinical practice, it promises to be a useful non-invasive tool for future personalized/adaptive neuro-oncology. This review provides an up-to-date summary of the recent advancements in the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiogenomics for the assessment of molecular markers of interest in GBM regarding prognosis and response to treatments, for monitoring recurrence, also providing insights into the potential efficacy of such an approach for survival prognostication. Despite a high sensitivity and specificity in almost all studies, accuracy, reproducibility and clinical value of radiomic features are the Achilles heel of this newborn tool. Looking into the future, investigators' efforts should be directed towards standardization and a disciplined approach to data collection, algorithms, and statistical analysis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Śledzińska P, Bebyn M, Furtak J, Koper A, Koper K. Current and promising treatment strategies in glioma. Rev Neurosci 2022:revneuro-2022-0060. [PMID: 36062548 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2022-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors; despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, glioma patients generally have a poor prognosis. Hence there is a clear need for improved therapeutic options. In recent years, significant effort has been made to investigate immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. The review covers well-established strategies such as surgery, temozolomide, PCV, and mTOR inhibitors. Furthermore, it summarizes promising therapies: tumor treating fields, immune therapies, tyrosine kinases inhibitors, IDH(Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-targeted approaches, and others. While there are many promising treatment strategies, none fundamentally changed the management of glioma patients. However, we are still awaiting the outcome of ongoing trials, which have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Śledzińska
- Molecular Oncology and Genetics Department, Innovative Medical Forum, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marek Bebyn
- Molecular Oncology and Genetics Department, Innovative Medical Forum, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jacek Furtak
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital and Polyclinic, 85-681 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Neurooncology and Radiosurgery, The F. Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Koper
- Department of Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Koper
- Department of Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Centre, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Clinical Oncology, and Nursing, Departament of Oncological Surgery, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 85-067 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leone A, Colamaria A, Fochi NP, Sacco M, Landriscina M, Parbonetti G, de Notaris M, Coppola G, De Santis E, Giordano G, Carbone F. Recurrent Glioblastoma Treatment: State of the Art and Future Perspectives in the Precision Medicine Era. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081927. [PMID: 36009473 PMCID: PMC9405902 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Current treatment guidelines for the management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) are far from definitive, and the prognosis remains dismal. Despite recent advancements in the pharmacological and surgical fields, numerous doubts persist concerning the optimal strategy that clinicians should adopt for patients who fail the first lines of treatment and present signs of progressive disease. With most recurrences being located within the margins of the previously resected lesion, a comprehensive molecular and genetic profiling of rGBM revealed substantial differences compared with newly diagnosed disease. In the present comprehensive review, we sought to examine the current treatment guidelines and the new perspectives that polarize the field of neuro-oncology, strictly focusing on progressive disease. For this purpose, updated PRISMA guidelines were followed to search for pivotal studies and clinical trials published in the last five years. A total of 125 articles discussing locoregional management, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy strategies were included in our analysis, and salient findings were critically summarized. In addition, an in-depth description of the molecular profile of rGBM and its distinctive characteristics is provided. Finally, we integrate the above-mentioned evidence with the current guidelines published by international societies, including AANS/CNS, EANO, AIOM, and NCCN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Leone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Nicola Pio Fochi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Sacco
- Department of Neurosurgery, Riuniti Hospital, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | - Matteo Landriscina
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| | | | - Matteo de Notaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, “Rummo” Hospital, 82100 Benevento, Italy
| | - Giulia Coppola
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Elena De Santis
- Department of Anatomical Histological Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
| | - Guido Giordano
- Unit of Medical
Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesco Carbone
- Department of Neurosurgery, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luger AL, König S, Samp PF, Urban H, Divé I, Burger MC, Voss M, Franz K, Fokas E, Filipski K, Demes MC, Stenzinger A, Sahm F, Reuss DE, Harter PN, Wagner S, Hattingen E, Wichert J, Lapa C, Fröhling S, Steinbach JP, Ronellenfitsch MW. Molecular matched targeted therapies for primary brain tumors-a single center retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:243-259. [PMID: 35864412 PMCID: PMC9424147 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04049-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular diagnostics including next generation gene sequencing are increasingly used to determine options for individualized therapies in brain tumor patients. We aimed to evaluate the decision-making process of molecular targeted therapies and analyze data on tolerability as well as signals for efficacy. METHODS Via retrospective analysis, we identified primary brain tumor patients who were treated off-label with a targeted therapy at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University. We analyzed which types of molecular alterations were utilized to guide molecular off-label therapies and the diagnostic procedures for their assessment during the period from 2008 to 2021. Data on tolerability and outcomes were collected. RESULTS 413 off-label therapies were identified with an increasing annual number for the interval after 2016. 37 interventions (9%) were targeted therapies based on molecular markers. Glioma and meningioma were the most frequent entities treated with molecular matched targeted therapies. Rare entities comprised e.g. medulloblastoma and papillary craniopharyngeoma. Molecular targeted approaches included checkpoint inhibitors, inhibitors of mTOR, FGFR, ALK, MET, ROS1, PIK3CA, CDK4/6, BRAF/MEK and PARP. Responses in the first follow-up MRI were partial response (13.5%), stable disease (29.7%) and progressive disease (46.0%). There were no new safety signals. Adverse events with fatal outcome (CTCAE grade 5) were not observed. Only, two patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.1/18 months in patients with at least stable disease, and 1.8/3.6 months in those with progressive disease at the first follow-up MRI. CONCLUSION A broad range of actionable alterations was targeted with available molecular therapeutics. However, efficacy was largely observed in entities with paradigmatic oncogenic drivers, in particular with BRAF mutations. Further research on biomarker-informed molecular matched therapies is urgently necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Luisa Luger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. .,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. .,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Sven König
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Patrick Felix Samp
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Urban
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Iris Divé
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael C Burger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Martin Voss
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kea Franz
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Katharina Filipski
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Neurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melanie-Christin Demes
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg Site, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Sahm
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David E Reuss
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick N Harter
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Neurological Institute (Edinger Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wagner
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jennifer Wichert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- Faculty of Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael W Ronellenfitsch
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang W, Hao Z, Mao F, Guo D. Small Molecule Inhibitors in Adult High-Grade Glioma: From the Past to the Future. Front Oncol 2022; 12:911876. [PMID: 35785151 PMCID: PMC9247310 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant tumor in the brain and has a dismal prognosis despite patients accepting standard therapies. Alternation of genes and deregulation of proteins, such as receptor tyrosine kinase, PI3K/Akt, PKC, Ras/Raf/MEK, histone deacetylases, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), CDK4/6, branched-chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1), and Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis and progression of glioma. Simultaneously, the abnormalities change the cellular biological behavior and microenvironment of tumor cells. The differences between tumor cells and normal tissue become the vulnerability of tumor, which can be taken advantage of using targeted therapies. Small molecule inhibitors, as an important part of modern treatment for cancers, have shown significant efficacy in hematologic cancers and some solid tumors. To date, in glioblastoma, there have been more than 200 clinical trials completed or ongoing in which trial designers used small molecules as monotherapy or combination regimens to correct the abnormalities. In this review, we summarize the dysfunctional molecular mechanisms and highlight the outcomes of relevant clinical trials associated with small-molecule targeted therapies. Based on the outcomes, the main findings were that small-molecule inhibitors did not bring more benefit to newly diagnosed glioblastoma, but the clinical studies involving progressive glioblastoma usually claimed “noninferiority” compared with historical results. However, as to the clinical inferiority trial, similar dosing regimens should be avoided in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenda Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhaonian Hao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Mao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Dongsheng Guo, ; Feng Mao,
| | - Dongsheng Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
- *Correspondence: Dongsheng Guo, ; Feng Mao,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Germano IM, Ziu M, Wen P, Ormond DR, Olson JJ. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy and other cytotoxic therapies in the management of progressive glioblastoma in adults. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:225-253. [PMID: 35195819 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03900-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients diagnosed with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). QUESTION (Q1): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of temozolomide (TMZ) with alternative dosing or the use of TMZ in combination with other cytotoxic treatments result in increased overall survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: Adult patients with pGBM might derive benefit in treatment with TMZ, especially those who progress after more than 5 months of TMZ-treatment free interval. LEVEL III Combination of TMZ with other cytotoxic agents such as nitrosourea, cisplatin, electrohyperthermia, or tamoxifen is not suggested in adult patients with pGBM as a stand-alone therapy. There is insufficient data to make a recommendation about which alternative TMZ dosing provides the best benefits. QUESTION (Q2): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of systemic or in situ nitrosourea result in increased overall survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: In the setting of pGBM, fotemustine is suggested in elderly patients with methylated MGMT promoter status. There is insufficient evidence to compare fotemustine to other nitrosoureas. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation about the use of in situ nitrosourea in patients with pGBM who underwent the Stupp regimen. QUESTION (Q3): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of platinum compounds and topoisomerase result in increased survival compared to other chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: Other chemotherapy including platinum compounds and topoisomerase inhibitors are not suggested to be used in adult patients with pGBM. LEVEL III Other cytotoxic therapies like perillyl acohol or ketogenic diet are not suggested for use in adult patients with pGBM as a stand-alone therapy. QUESTION (Q4): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of tumor treating field (TTF) result in increased overall survival compared to chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: The use of TTF with other chemotherapy may be considered when treating adult patients with pGBM. There is insufficient evidence to recommend TTF to increase overall survival in adult patients with pGBM. QUESTION (Q5): In adult patients with pGBM does the use of oncolytic virotherapy result in increased survival compared to chemotherapy? RECOMMENDATION Level III: Oncolytic virotherapy is not suggested in patients with pGBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle M Germano
- Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Mateo Ziu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Neurosciences, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Patrick Wen
- Center For Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - D Ryan Ormond
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gatto L, Di Nunno V, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Glioblastoma: Where Are We to Date? Drugs 2022; 82:491-510. [PMID: 35397073 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01702-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The clinical management of glioblastoma (GBM) is still bereft of treatments able to significantly improve the poor prognosis of the disease. Despite the extreme clinical need for novel therapeutic drugs, only a small percentage of patients with GBM benefit from inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, often clinical studies do not lead to final interpretable conclusions. From the mistakes and negative results obtained in the last years, we are now able to plan a novel generation of clinical studies for patients with GBM, allowing the testing of multiple anticancer agents at the same time. This assumes critical importance, considering that, thanks to improved knowledge of altered molecular mechanisms related to the disease, we are now able to propose several potential effective compounds in patients with both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. Among the novel compounds assessed, the initially great enthusiasm toward trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was disappointing due to the negative results that emerged in three randomized phase III trials. However, novel biological insights into the disease suggest that immunotherapy can be a convincing and effective treatment in GBM even if ICIs failed to prolong the survival of these patients. In this regard, the most promising approach consists of engineered immune cells such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T, CAR M, and CAR NK alone or in combination with other treatments. In this review, we discuss several issues related to systemic treatments in GBM patients. First, we assess critical issues toward the planning of clinical trials and the strategies employed to overcome these obstacles. We then move on to the most relevant interventional studies carried out on patients with previously untreated (newly diagnosed) GBM and those with recurrent and pretreated disease. Finally, we investigate novel immunotherapeutic approaches with special emphasis on preclinical and clinical data related to the administration of engineered immune cells in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Franceschi
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefania Bartolini
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alba Ariela Brandes
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura 3, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maggio I, Franceschi E, Di Nunno V, Gatto L, Tosoni A, Angelini D, Bartolini S, Lodi R, Brandes AA. Discovering the Molecular Landscape of Meningioma: The Struggle to Find New Therapeutic Targets. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:1852. [PMID: 34679551 PMCID: PMC8534341 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary CNS tumors. They are usually benign but can present aggressive behavior in about 20% of cases. The genetic landscape of meningioma is characterized by the presence (in about 60% of cases) or absence of NF2 mutation. Low-grade meningiomas can also present other genetic alterations, particularly affecting SMO, TRAF7, KLF4 AKT1 and PI3KCA. In higher grade meningiomas, mutations of TERT promoter and deletion of CDKN2A/B seem to have a prognostic value. Furthermore, other genetic alterations have been identified, such as BAP1, DMD and PBRM1. Different subgroups of DNA methylation appear to be correlated with prognosis. In this review, we explored the genetic landscape of meningiomas and the possible therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Maggio
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda USL, Via Altura n. 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (I.M.); (V.D.N.); (L.G.)
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Di Nunno
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda USL, Via Altura n. 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (I.M.); (V.D.N.); (L.G.)
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda USL, Via Altura n. 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (I.M.); (V.D.N.); (L.G.)
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Daniele Angelini
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Stefania Bartolini
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; or
| | - Alba Ariela Brandes
- Nervous System Medical Oncology Department, IRCSS Istituto di Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gatto L, Franceschi E, Di Nunno V, Tosoni A, Lodi R, Brandes AA. Liquid Biopsy in Glioblastoma Management: From Current Research to Future Perspectives. Oncologist 2021; 26:865-878. [PMID: 34105205 PMCID: PMC8488799 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary tumor of the central nervous system. Arising from neuroepithelial glial cells, GBM is characterized by invasive behavior, extensive angiogenesis, and genetic heterogeneity that contributes to poor prognosis and treatment failure. Currently, there are several molecular biomarkers available to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, and predicting treatment outcomes; however, all require the biopsy of tumor tissue. Nevertheless, a tissue sample from a single location has its own limitations, including the risk related to the procedure and the difficulty of obtaining longitudinal samples to monitor treatment response and to fully capture the intratumoral heterogeneity of GBM. To date, there are no biomarkers in blood or cerebrospinal fluid for detection, follow-up, or prognostication of GBM. Liquid biopsy offers an attractive and minimally invasive solution to support different stages of GBM management, assess the molecular biology of the tumor, identify early recurrence and longitudinal genomic evolution, predict both prognosis and potential resistance to chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and allow patient selection for targeted therapies. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge regarding the application of liquid biopsy in glioblastoma, highlighting both benefits and obstacles to translation into clinical care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To translate liquid biopsy into clinical practice, further prospective studies are required with larger cohorts to increase specificity and sensitivity. With the ever-growing interest in RNA nanotechnology, microRNAs may have a therapeutic role in brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Gatto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Vincenzo Di Nunno
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)BolognaItaly
| | - Alba Ariela Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale (USL) of BolognaBolognaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu W, Klockow JL, Zhang M, Lafortune F, Chang E, Jin L, Wu Y, Daldrup-Link HE. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): An overview of current therapies and mechanisms of resistance. Pharmacol Res 2021; 171:105780. [PMID: 34302977 PMCID: PMC8384724 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 225] [Impact Index Per Article: 75.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a WHO grade IV glioma and the most common malignant, primary brain tumor with a 5-year survival of 7.2%. Its highly infiltrative nature, genetic heterogeneity, and protection by the blood brain barrier (BBB) have posed great treatment challenges. The standard treatment for GBMs is surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy. The robust DNA repair and self-renewing capabilities of glioblastoma cells and glioma initiating cells (GICs), respectively, promote resistance against all current treatment modalities. Thus, durable GBM management will require the invention of innovative treatment strategies. In this review, we will describe biological and molecular targets for GBM therapy, the current status of pharmacologic therapy, prominent mechanisms of resistance, and new treatment approaches. To date, medical imaging is primarily used to determine the location, size and macroscopic morphology of GBM before, during, and after therapy. In the future, molecular and cellular imaging approaches will more dynamically monitor the expression of molecular targets and/or immune responses in the tumor, thereby enabling more immediate adaptation of tumor-tailored, targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jessica L Klockow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michael Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Famyrah Lafortune
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Edwin Chang
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Linchun Jin
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
| | - Yang Wu
- Department of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Bayern 81675, Germany
| | - Heike E Daldrup-Link
- Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gatto L, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Di Nunno V, Maggio I, Tonon C, Lodi R, Agati R, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. Distinct MRI pattern of "pseudoresponse" in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with regorafenib: Case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep 2021; 9:e04604. [PMID: 34457284 PMCID: PMC8380081 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.4604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Antiangiogenic agents can induce a distinct MRI pattern in glioblastoma, characterized by a decrease in the contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images and a simultaneous hyperintensity on T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Gatto
- Department of Medical OncologyAzienda USL of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | | | - Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Medical OncologyAzienda USL of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | | | - Ilaria Maggio
- Department of Medical OncologyAzienda USL of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Caterina Tonon
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - Raffaele Agati
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di BolognaBolognaItaly
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Di Nunno V, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Gatto L, Lodi R, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. Glioblastoma: Emerging Treatments and Novel Trial Designs. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153750. [PMID: 34359651 PMCID: PMC8345198 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Nowadays, very few systemic agents have shown clinical activity in patients with glioblastoma, making the research of novel therapeutic approaches a critical issue. Fortunately, the availability of novel compounds is increasing thanks to better biological knowledge of the disease. In this review we want to investigate more promising ongoing clinical trials in both primary and recurrent GBM. Furthermore, a great interest of the present work is focused on novel trial design strategies. Abstract Management of glioblastoma is a clinical challenge since very few systemic treatments have shown clinical efficacy in recurrent disease. Thanks to an increased knowledge of the biological and molecular mechanisms related to disease progression and growth, promising novel treatment strategies are emerging. The expanding availability of innovative compounds requires the design of a new generation of clinical trials, testing experimental compounds in a short time and tailoring the sample cohort based on molecular and clinical behaviors. In this review, we focused our attention on the assessment of promising novel treatment approaches, discussing novel trial design and possible future fields of development in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Di Nunno
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0516225697
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Stefania Bartolini
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| | - Alba Ariela Brandes
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy; (E.F.); (A.T.); (L.G.); (S.B.); (A.A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bolcaen J, Nair S, Driver CHS, Boshomane TMG, Ebenhan T, Vandevoorde C. Novel Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pathway Inhibitors for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Glioblastoma. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:626. [PMID: 34209513 PMCID: PMC8308832 DOI: 10.3390/ph14070626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GB) remains the most fatal brain tumor characterized by a high infiltration rate and treatment resistance. Overexpression and/or mutation of receptor tyrosine kinases is common in GB, which subsequently leads to the activation of many downstream pathways that have a critical impact on tumor progression and therapy resistance. Therefore, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) have been investigated to improve the dismal prognosis of GB in an effort to evolve into a personalized targeted therapy strategy with a better treatment outcome. Numerous RTKIs have been approved in the clinic and several radiopharmaceuticals are part of (pre)clinical trials as a non-invasive method to identify patients who could benefit from RTKI. The latter opens up the scope for theranostic applications. In this review, the present status of RTKIs for the treatment, nuclear imaging and targeted radionuclide therapy of GB is presented. The focus will be on seven tyrosine kinase receptors, based on their central role in GB: EGFR, VEGFR, MET, PDGFR, FGFR, Eph receptor and IGF1R. Finally, by way of analyzing structural and physiological characteristics of the TKIs with promising clinical trial results, four small molecule RTKIs were selected based on their potential to become new therapeutic GB radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bolcaen
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa;
| | - Shankari Nair
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa;
| | - Cathryn H. S. Driver
- Radiochemistry, South African Nuclear Energy Corporation, Pelindaba, Brits 0240, South Africa;
- Pre-Clinical Imaging Facility, Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure, Pelindaba, Brits 0242, South Africa;
| | - Tebatso M. G. Boshomane
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa;
| | - Thomas Ebenhan
- Pre-Clinical Imaging Facility, Nuclear Medicine Research Infrastructure, Pelindaba, Brits 0242, South Africa;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria 0001, South Africa;
- Preclinical Drug Development Platform, Department of Science and Technology, North West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Radiobiology, Radiation Biophysics Division, Nuclear Medicine Department, iThemba LABS, Cape Town 7131, South Africa;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Colardo M, Segatto M, Di Bartolomeo S. Targeting RTK-PI3K-mTOR Axis in Gliomas: An Update. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:4899. [PMID: 34063168 PMCID: PMC8124221 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common and challenging malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS), due to their infiltrative nature, tendency to recurrence, and poor response to treatments. Indeed, despite the advances in neurosurgical techniques and in radiation therapy, the modest effects of therapy are still challenging. Moreover, tumor recurrence is associated with the onset of therapy resistance; it is therefore critical to identify effective and well-tolerated pharmacological approaches capable of inducing durable responses in the appropriate patient groups. Molecular alterations of the RTK/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway are typical hallmarks of glioma, and several clinical trials targeting one or more players of this axis have been launched, showing disappointing results so far, due to the scarce BBB permeability of certain compounds or to the occurrence of resistance/tolerance mechanisms. However, as RTK/PI3K/mTOR is one of the pivotal pathways regulating cell growth and survival in cancer biology, targeting still remains a strong rationale for developing strategies against gliomas. Future rigorous clinical studies, aimed at addressing the tumor heterogeneity, the interaction with the microenvironment, as well as diverse posology adjustments, are needed-which might unravel the therapeutic efficacy and response prediction of an RTK/PI3K/mTOR-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sabrina Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, 86090 Pesche, IS, Italy; (M.C.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Franceschi E, De Biase D, Di Nunno V, Pession A, Tosoni A, Gatto L, Tallini G, Visani M, Lodi R, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. The clinical and prognostic role of ALK in glioblastoma. Pathol Res Pract 2021; 221:153447. [PMID: 33887544 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) overexpression and gene alterations have been detected in several malignancies, with prognostic and therapeutic implications. However, few studies investigated the correlation between ALK altered expression and prognosis in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS We performed an evaluation of ALK overexpression and structural/quantitative chromosome alterations through immune-histochemical assay (IHC with D5F3 antibody) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild type (wt) GBM. Assuming an ALK overexpression in 20 % of patients we planned a sample of 44 patients to achieve a probability of 90 % to include from 10 % to 30 % of patients with ALK alterations. RESULTS We evaluated 44 patients with IDH wt GBM, treated in our institution and dead due to GBM progression in 2017. ALK overexpression obtained by a composed score (the product of IHC intensity staining and rate of positive cells) was observed in 19 (43 %) patients. FISH analysis showed that 11 patients (25 %) had gene deletion, 2 patients (4.5 %) had monosomy and one patient (2.3 %) presented polysomy. Only one patient (2.3 %) demonstrated ALK rearrangement. There was no statistical difference in median OS between patients with ALK-positive (mOS = 18.9 months) and ALK-negative IHC (mOS = 18.0 months). CONCLUSION We identified some rare previously unreported alterations of ALK gene in patients with IDH wt GBM. In these patients, the ALK overexpression does not influences survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario De Biase
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBIT) - Molecular Pathology Laboratory, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Annalisa Pession
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology (FaBIT) - Molecular Pathology Laboratory, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Oncology, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tallini
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, University of Bologna School of Medicine and Surgery, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michela Visani
- Molecular Diagnostic Unit, University of Bologna School of Medicine and Surgery, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cruz Da Silva E, Mercier MC, Etienne-Selloum N, Dontenwill M, Choulier L. A Systematic Review of Glioblastoma-Targeted Therapies in Phases II, III, IV Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1795. [PMID: 33918704 PMCID: PMC8069979 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM), the most frequent and aggressive glial tumor, is currently treated as first line by the Stupp protocol, which combines, after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. For recurrent GBM, in absence of standard treatment or available clinical trials, various protocols including cytotoxic drugs and/or bevacizumab are currently applied. Despite these heavy treatments, the mean overall survival of patients is under 18 months. Many clinical studies are underway. Based on clinicaltrials.org and conducted up to 1 April 2020, this review lists, not only main, but all targeted therapies in phases II-IV of 257 clinical trials on adults with newly diagnosed or recurrent GBMs for the last twenty years. It does not involve targeted immunotherapies and therapies targeting tumor cell metabolism, that are well documented in other reviews. Without surprise, the most frequently reported drugs are those targeting (i) EGFR (40 clinical trials), and more generally tyrosine kinase receptors (85 clinical trials) and (ii) VEGF/VEGFR (75 clinical trials of which 53 involving bevacizumab). But many other targets and drugs are of interest. They are all listed and thoroughly described, on an one-on-one basis, in four sections related to targeting (i) GBM stem cells and stem cell pathways, (ii) the growth autonomy and migration, (iii) the cell cycle and the escape to cell death, (iv) and angiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabete Cruz Da Silva
- CNRS, UMR 7021, Laboratoire de Bioimagerie et Pathologies, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France; (E.C.D.S.); (M.-C.M.); (N.E.-S.); (M.D.)
| | - Marie-Cécile Mercier
- CNRS, UMR 7021, Laboratoire de Bioimagerie et Pathologies, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France; (E.C.D.S.); (M.-C.M.); (N.E.-S.); (M.D.)
| | - Nelly Etienne-Selloum
- CNRS, UMR 7021, Laboratoire de Bioimagerie et Pathologies, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France; (E.C.D.S.); (M.-C.M.); (N.E.-S.); (M.D.)
- Service de Pharmacie, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Monique Dontenwill
- CNRS, UMR 7021, Laboratoire de Bioimagerie et Pathologies, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France; (E.C.D.S.); (M.-C.M.); (N.E.-S.); (M.D.)
| | - Laurence Choulier
- CNRS, UMR 7021, Laboratoire de Bioimagerie et Pathologies, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Strasbourg, 67401 Illkirch, France; (E.C.D.S.); (M.-C.M.); (N.E.-S.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tosoni A, Gatto L, Franceschi E, Di Nunno V, Lodi R, Mura A, Di Battista M, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. Association between socioeconomic status and survival in glioblastoma: An Italian single-centre prospective observational study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 145:171-178. [PMID: 33486440 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, no prospective study has been conducted to investigate the role of socioeconomic status (SES) on clinical outcome of glioblastoma (GBM) in Italy, where there is a National Health Service that provides universal coverage regardless of the patient's economic status. METHODS We performed a prospective observational study investigating the association between SES and survival in GBM patients at our institution, a hub centre for brain cancer research and treatment. We included GBM patients who underwent medical treatment or chemo-radiation between April 2017 and December 2017. The SES was measured using the income-brackets, attributed by the Italian Ministry of Finance on the basis of the income of the fiscal family unit, referring to the previous year. RESULTS One hundred and six patients were included in the study. In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) correlated significantly with higher-income (HR = 0.623.95% CI 0.467-0.832; p = 0.001) and MGMT methylation status (HR = 0.158.95% CI 0.082-0.304; P < 0.001). When adjusted for age, performance status and extension of surgery, survival benefit remained superior for higher-income HR = 0.641 (95% CI 0.478-0.858; p = 0.003) and MGMT methylated tumours HR = 0.167 (95% CI 0.084-0.331; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS SES is an important determinant of prognosis in GBM even in the Italian National Health Service, which provides universal, largely free and relatively comprehensive healthcare. Despite aspirations to achieve equality in healthcare, socioeconomic differences exist and may impact the clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Vincenzo Di Nunno
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonella Mura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Birzu C, French P, Caccese M, Cerretti G, Idbaih A, Zagonel V, Lombardi G. Recurrent Glioblastoma: From Molecular Landscape to New Treatment Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:E47. [PMID: 33375286 PMCID: PMC7794906 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most frequent and aggressive form among malignant central nervous system primary tumors in adults. Standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma consists in maximal safe resection, if feasible, followed by radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide; despite this multimodal treatment, virtually all glioblastomas relapse. Once tumors progress after first-line therapy, treatment options are limited and management of recurrent glioblastoma remains challenging. Loco-regional therapy with re-surgery or re-irradiation may be evaluated in selected cases, while traditional systemic therapy with nitrosoureas and temozolomide rechallenge showed limited efficacy. In recent years, new clinical trials using, for example, regorafenib or a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy were performed with promising results. In particular, molecular targeted therapy could show efficacy in selected patients with specific gene mutations. Nonetheless, some molecular characteristics and genetic alterations could change during tumor progression, thus affecting the efficacy of precision medicine. We therefore reviewed the molecular and genomic landscape of recurrent glioblastoma, the strategy for clinical management and the major phase I-III clinical trials analyzing recent drugs and combination regimens in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Birzu
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière—Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013 Paris, France; (C.B.); (A.I.)
| | - Pim French
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Giulia Cerretti
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Ahmed Idbaih
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, CNRS, UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau, ICM, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière—Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, F-75013 Paris, France; (C.B.); (A.I.)
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, via Gattamelata 54, 35128 Padua, Italy; (M.C.); (G.C.); (V.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Torrisi F, Vicario N, Spitale FM, Cammarata FP, Minafra L, Salvatorelli L, Russo G, Cuttone G, Valable S, Gulino R, Magro G, Parenti R. The Role of Hypoxia and SRC Tyrosine Kinase in Glioblastoma Invasiveness and Radioresistance. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2860. [PMID: 33020459 PMCID: PMC7599682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in functional imaging are supporting neurosurgery and radiotherapy for glioblastoma, which still remains the most aggressive brain tumor with poor prognosis. The typical infiltration pattern of glioblastoma, which impedes a complete surgical resection, is coupled with a high rate of invasiveness and radioresistance, thus further limiting efficient therapy, leading to inevitable and fatal recurrences. Hypoxia is of crucial importance in gliomagenesis and, besides reducing radiotherapy efficacy, also induces cellular and molecular mediators that foster proliferation and invasion. In this review, we aimed at analyzing the biological mechanism of glioblastoma invasiveness and radioresistance in hypoxic niches of glioblastoma. We also discussed the link between hypoxia and radiation-induced radioresistance with activation of SRC proto-oncogene non-receptor tyrosine kinase, prospecting potential strategies to overcome the current limitation in glioblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Torrisi
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Physiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.); (F.M.S.); (R.G.)
| | - Nunzio Vicario
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Physiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.); (F.M.S.); (R.G.)
| | - Federica M. Spitale
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Physiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.); (F.M.S.); (R.G.)
| | - Francesco P. Cammarata
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy; (L.M.); (G.R.)
| | - Luigi Minafra
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy; (L.M.); (G.R.)
| | - Lucia Salvatorelli
- Department G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele” Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (L.S.); (G.M.)
| | - Giorgio Russo
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy; (L.M.); (G.R.)
| | - Giacomo Cuttone
- National Laboratory of South, National Institute for Nuclear Physics (LNS-INFN), 95125 Catania, Italy;
| | - Samuel Valable
- ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, CEA, CNRS, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14074 Caen, France;
| | - Rosario Gulino
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Physiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.); (F.M.S.); (R.G.)
| | - Gaetano Magro
- Department G.F. Ingrassia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele” Anatomic Pathology, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy; (L.S.); (G.M.)
| | - Rosalba Parenti
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), Section of Physiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.); (F.M.S.); (R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Di Nunno V, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Di Battista M, Gatto L, Lamperini C, Minichillo S, Mura A, Bartolini S, Brandes AA. Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:785-795. [PMID: 32799576 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1807949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost all patients affected by glioblastoma experience recurrence of the disease. AREAS COVERED Management of recurrent glioblastoma is a clinical challenge, and several elements should be taken into consideration when making treatment choice. Loco-regional treatments may be the best treatment approach in selected cases while systemic therapies or supportive care alone are necessary for other patients. Unfortunately, few drugs have shown clinical in this setting. This lack of effective treatments has made recurrent glioblastoma a disease orphan of an effective approach. EXPERT OPINION Results of recent clinical trials offer interesting perspectives and may controvert this axiom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Di Nunno
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Enrico Franceschi
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Alicia Tosoni
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Monica Di Battista
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Gatto
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Cinzia Lamperini
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Santino Minichillo
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonella Mura
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefania Bartolini
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| | - Alba A Brandes
- Department of Medical Oncology - Azienda USL di Bologna , Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Torrisi F, Minafra L, Cammarata FP, Savoca G, Calvaruso M, Vicario N, Maccari L, Pérès EA, Özçelik H, Bernaudin M, Botta L, Russo G, Parenti R, Valable S. SRC Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and X-rays Combined Effect on Glioblastoma Cell Lines. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21113917. [PMID: 32486205 PMCID: PMC7312922 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most lethal types of tumor due to its high recurrence level in spite of aggressive treatment regimens involving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Hypoxia is a feature of GBM, involved in radioresistance, and is known to be at the origin of treatment failure. The aim of this work was to assess the therapeutic potential of a new targeted c-SRC inhibitor molecule, named Si306, in combination with X-rays on the human glioblastoma cell lines, comparing normoxia and hypoxia conditions. For this purpose, the dose modifying factor and oxygen enhancement ratio were calculated to evaluate the Si306 radiosensitizing effect. DNA damage and the repair capability were also studied from the kinetic of γ-H2AX immunodetection. Furthermore, motility processes being supposed to be triggered by hypoxia and irradiation, the role of c-SRC inhibition was also analyzed to evaluate the migration blockage by wound healing assay. Our results showed that inhibition of the c-SRC protein enhances the radiotherapy efficacy both in normoxic and hypoxic conditions. These data open new opportunities for GBM treatment combining radiotherapy with molecularly targeted drugs to overcome radioresistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Torrisi
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.)
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
| | - Luigi Minafra
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
| | - Francesco P. Cammarata
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
- Correspondence: (F.P.C.); (R.P.)
| | - Gaetano Savoca
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
| | - Marco Calvaruso
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
| | - Nunzio Vicario
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.)
| | - Laura Maccari
- Lead Discovery Siena s.r.l. (LDS), via Vittorio Alfieri, 31, Castelnuovo Berardenga, 53019 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Elodie A. Pérès
- UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, Normandie University, 14074 Caen, France; (E.A.P.); (H.Ö.); (M.B.); (S.V.)
| | - Hayriye Özçelik
- UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, Normandie University, 14074 Caen, France; (E.A.P.); (H.Ö.); (M.B.); (S.V.)
| | - Myriam Bernaudin
- UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, Normandie University, 14074 Caen, France; (E.A.P.); (H.Ö.); (M.B.); (S.V.)
| | - Lorenzo Botta
- Lead Discovery Siena s.r.l. (LDS), via Vittorio Alfieri, 31, Castelnuovo Berardenga, 53019 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (L.B.)
| | - Giorgio Russo
- National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN-LNS, 95123 Catania, Italy; (L.M.); (G.S.); (M.C.); (G.R.)
- Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, 90015 Cefalù, Italy
| | - Rosalba Parenti
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIOMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy; (F.T.); (N.V.)
- Correspondence: (F.P.C.); (R.P.)
| | - Samuel Valable
- UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP Cyceron, Normandie University, 14074 Caen, France; (E.A.P.); (H.Ö.); (M.B.); (S.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carpenter CD, Alnahhas I, Gonzalez J, Giglio P, Puduvalli VK. Changing paradigms for targeted therapies against diffuse infiltrative gliomas: tackling a moving target. Expert Rev Neurother 2019; 19:663-677. [PMID: 31106606 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1621169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Gliomas are highly heterogeneous primary brain tumors which result in a disproportionately high degree of morbidity and mortality despite their locoregional occurrence. Advances in the understanding of the biological makeup of these malignancies have yielded a number of potential tumor-driving pathways which have been identified as rational targets for therapy. However, early trials of agents that target these pathways have uniformly failed to yield improvement in outcomes in patients with malignant gliomas. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the most common biological features of gliomas and the strategies to target the same; in addition, the current status of immunotherapy and biological therapies are outlined and the future directions to tackle the challenges of therapy for gliomas are examined. Expert opinion: The limitations of current treatments are attributed to the inability of most of these agents to cross the blood-brain barrier and to the intrinsic heterogeneity of the tumors that result in treatment resistance. The recent emergence of immune-mediated and biological therapies and of agents that target metabolic pathways in gliomas have provided strategies that may overcome tumor heterogeneity and ongoing trials of such agents are anticipated to yield improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice D Carpenter
- a Department of Neurosurgery , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Iyad Alnahhas
- b Division of Neurooncology , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Javier Gonzalez
- a Department of Neurosurgery , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA.,b Division of Neurooncology , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Pierre Giglio
- a Department of Neurosurgery , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA.,b Division of Neurooncology , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- a Department of Neurosurgery , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA.,b Division of Neurooncology , The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center , Columbus , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sharma P, Debinski W. Receptor-Targeted Glial Brain Tumor Therapies. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:E3326. [PMID: 30366424 PMCID: PMC6274942 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Among primary brain tumors, malignant gliomas are notably difficult to manage. The higher-grade tumors represent an unmet need in medicine. There have been extensive efforts to implement receptor-targeted therapeutic approaches directed against gliomas. These approaches include immunotherapies, such as vaccines, adoptive immunotherapy, and passive immunotherapy. Targeted cytotoxic radio energy and pro-drug activation have been designed specifically for brain tumors. The field of targeting through receptors progressed significantly with the discovery of an interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL-13RA2) as a tumor-associated receptor over-expressed in most patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but not in normal brain. IL-13RA2 has been exploited in novel experimental therapies with very encouraging clinical responses. Other receptors are specifically over-expressed in many patients with GBM, such as EphA2 and EphA3 receptors, among others. These findings are important in view of the heterogeneity of GBM tumors and multiple tumor compartments responsible for tumor progression and resistance to therapies. The combined targeting of multiple receptors in different tumor compartments should be a preferred way to design novel receptor-targeted therapeutic approaches in gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja Sharma
- Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Waldemar Debinski
- Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Harris M, Svensson F, Kopanitsa L, Ladds G, Bailey D. Emerging patents in the therapeutic areas of glioma and glioblastoma. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2018; 28:573-590. [DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2018.1494155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Harris
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fredrik Svensson
- IOTA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, St Johns Innovation Centre, Cambridge CB4 0WS, UK
| | - Liliya Kopanitsa
- IOTA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, St Johns Innovation Centre, Cambridge CB4 0WS, UK
| | - Graham Ladds
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Bailey
- IOTA Pharmaceuticals Ltd, St Johns Innovation Centre, Cambridge CB4 0WS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Baro M, Lopez Sambrooks C, Quijano A, Saltzman WM, Contessa J. Oligosaccharyltransferase Inhibition Reduces Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activation and Enhances Glioma Radiosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 25:784-795. [PMID: 29967251 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Parallel signaling reduces the effects of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-targeted therapies in glioma. We hypothesized that inhibition of protein N-linked glycosylation, an endoplasmic reticulum co- and posttranslational modification crucial for RTK maturation and activation, could provide a new therapeutic approach for glioma radiosensitization.Experimental Design: We investigated the effects of a small-molecule inhibitor of the oligosaccharyltransferase (NGI-1) on EGFR family receptors, MET, PDGFR, and FGFR1. The influence of glycosylation state on tumor cell radiosensitivity, chemotherapy-induced cell toxicity, DNA damage, and cell-cycle arrest were determined and correlated with glioma cell receptor expression profiles. The effects of NGI-1 on xenograft tumor growth were tested using a nanoparticle formulation validated by in vivo molecular imaging. A mechanistic role for RTK signaling was evaluated through the expression of a glycosylation-independent CD8-EGFR chimera. RESULTS NGI-1 reduced glycosylation, protein levels, and activation of most RTKs. NGI-1 also enhanced the radiosensitivity and cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy in those glioma cells with elevated ErbB family activation, but not in cells without high levels of RTK activation. NGI-1 radiosensitization was associated with increases in both DNA damage and G1 cell-cycle arrest. Combined treatment of glioma xenografts with fractionated radiotherapy and NGI-1 significantly reduced tumor growth compared with controls. Expression of the CD8-EGFR eliminated the effects of NGI-1 on G1 arrest, DNA damage, and cellular radiosensitivity, identifying RTK inhibition as the principal mechanism for the NGI-1 effect. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that oligosaccharyltransferase inhibition with NGI-1 is a novel approach to radiosensitize malignant gliomas with enhanced RTK signaling.See related commentary by Wahl and Lawrence, p. 455.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Baro
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Amanda Quijano
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - W Mark Saltzman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Joseph Contessa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. .,Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Greish K, Jasim A, Parayath N, Abdelghany S, Alkhateeb A, Taurin S, Nehoff H. Micellar formulations of Crizotinib and Dasatinib in the management of glioblastoma multiforme. J Drug Target 2017; 26:692-708. [PMID: 29251531 DOI: 10.1080/1061186x.2017.1419357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) defies the currently practiced management of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery and hence, it is associated with a high fatality rate with a median survival of 14.6 months. In our previous work investigating different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), we established that a combination of Crizotinib and Dasatinib exerted the most potent effect on different GBM cell lines. In this work, to improve targeted therapy at the site of the tumour and avoid systemic toxicity, we exploited the enhanced permeability and retention effect by designing micellar formulations of these two TKIs. Crizotinib and Dasatinib were successfully encapsulated in poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) micelles which were then evaluated for their physicochemical characteristics, anti-proliferative effect, mode of cell death, efficacy in spheroid models, effect on cell signalling, antiangiogenic potential and in vivo anticancer activity. Our results showed that this combination had induced a potent anti-proliferative effect in four GBM cell lines grown as a monolayer and as a spheroid. The combination was also efficacious in in vitro models of angiogenesis and vascular mimicry. In vivo data showed the enhanced activity of the micellar TKIs compared to free drugs. In conclusion, we proved that micellar formulations of Crizotinib and Dasatinib carry promising in vitro and in vivo efficacy that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Greish
- a College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine, and Nanomedicine Unit , Princess Al-Jawhara Center for Molecular Medicine, Arabian Gulf University , Manama , Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Anfal Jasim
- a College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine, and Nanomedicine Unit , Princess Al-Jawhara Center for Molecular Medicine, Arabian Gulf University , Manama , Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Neha Parayath
- b Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences , Northeastern University , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Sara Abdelghany
- a College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine, and Nanomedicine Unit , Princess Al-Jawhara Center for Molecular Medicine, Arabian Gulf University , Manama , Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Ali Alkhateeb
- a College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Department of Molecular Medicine, and Nanomedicine Unit , Princess Al-Jawhara Center for Molecular Medicine, Arabian Gulf University , Manama , Kingdom of Bahrain
| | - Sebastien Taurin
- c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Hayley Nehoff
- d Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology , University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
A combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, crizotinib and dasatinib for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncotarget 2016; 6:37948-64. [PMID: 26517812 PMCID: PMC4741976 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 10/06/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite the advances in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, patient survival averages only 14.6 months. In most GBM tumors, tyrosine kinases show increased activity and/or expression and actively contribute to the development, recurrence and onset of treatment resistance; making their inhibition an appealing therapeutic strategy. We compared the cytotoxicity of 12 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in vitro. A combination of crizotinib and dasatinib emerged as the most cytotoxic across established and primary human GBM cell lines. The combination treatment induced apoptotic cell death and polyploidy. Furthermore, the combination treatment led to the altered expression and localization of several tyrosine kinase receptors such as Met and EGFR and downstream effectors as such as SRC. Furthermore, the combination treatment reduced the migration and invasion of GBM cells and prevented endothelial cell tube formation in vitro. Overall, our study demonstrated the broad specificity of a combination of crizotinib and dasatinib across multiple GBM cell lines. These findings provide insight into the development of alternative therapy for the treatment of GBM.
Collapse
|
35
|
Royer-Perron L, Idbaih A, Sanson M, Delattre JY, Hoang-Xuan K, Alentorn A. Precision medicine in glioblastoma therapy. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2016.1241128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite substantial improvements in standards of care, the most common aggressive pediatric and adult high-grade gliomas (HGG) carry uniformly fatal diagnoses due to unique treatment limitations, high recurrence rates and the absence of effective treatments following recurrence. Recent advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology, genetics and epigenetics as well as mechanisms of immune surveillance during gliomagenesis have created new knowledge to design more effective and target-directed therapies to improve patient outcomes. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors discuss the critical genetic, epigenetic and immunologic aberrations found in gliomas that appear rational and promising for therapeutic developments in the presence and future. The current state of the latest therapeutic developments including tumor-specific targeted drug therapies, metabolic targeting, epigenetic modulation and immunotherapy are summarized and suggestions for future directions are offered. Furthermore, they highlight contemporary issues related to the clinical development, such as challenges in clinical trials and toxicities. EXPERT OPINION The commitment to understanding the process of gliomagenesis has created a catalogue of aberrations that depict multiple mechanisms underlying this disease, many of which are suitable to therapeutic inhibition and are currently tested in clinical trials. Thus, future treatment endeavors will employ multiple treatment modalities that target disparate tumor characteristics personalized to the patient's individual tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Staedtke
- a Department of Neurology , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - Ren-Yuan Bai
- b Department of Neurosurgery , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore , MD , USA
| | - John Laterra
- a Department of Neurology , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore , MD , USA.,c Department of Oncology , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore , MD , USA.,d Department of Neuroscience , Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions , Baltimore , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Switzeny OJ, Christmann M, Renovanz M, Giese A, Sommer C, Kaina B. MGMT promoter methylation determined by HRM in comparison to MSP and pyrosequencing for predicting high-grade glioma response. Clin Epigenetics 2016; 8:49. [PMID: 27158275 PMCID: PMC4858829 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-016-0204-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) causes resistance of cancer cells to alkylating agents and, therefore, is a well-established predictive marker for high-grade gliomas that are routinely treated with alkylating drugs. Since MGMT is highly epigenetically regulated, the MGMT promoter methylation status is taken as an indicator of MGMT silencing, predicting the outcome of glioma therapy. MGMT promoter methylation is usually determined by methylation specific PCR (MSP), which is a labor intensive and error-prone method often used semi-quantitatively. Searching for alternatives, we used closed-tube high resolution melt (HRM) analysis, which is a quantitative method, and compared it with MSP and pyrosequencing regarding its predictive value. RESULTS We analyzed glioblastoma cell lines with known MGMT activity and formalin-fixed samples from IDH1 wild-type high-grade glioma patients (WHO grade III/IV) treated with radiation and temozolomide by HRM, MSP, and pyrosequencing. The data were compared as to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients exhibiting the methylated and unmethylated MGMT status. A promoter methylation cut-off level relevant for PFS and OS was determined. In a multivariate Cox regression model, methylation of MGMT promoter of high-grade gliomas analyzed by HRM, but not MSP, was found to be an independent predictive marker for OS. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed for PFS and OS a significant and better discrimination between methylated and unmethylated tumors when quantitative HRM was used instead of MSP. CONCLUSIONS Compared to MSP and pyrosequencing, the HRM method is simple, cost effective, highly accurate and fast. HRM is at least equivalent to pyrosequencing in quantifying the methylation level. It is superior in predicting PFS and OS of high-grade glioma patients compared to MSP and, therefore, can be recommended being used routinely for determination of the MGMT status of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier J Switzeny
- Department of Toxicology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Christmann
- Department of Toxicology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Alf Giese
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Clemens Sommer
- Department of Neuropathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernd Kaina
- Department of Toxicology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Fisusi FA, Siew A, Chooi KW, Okubanjo O, Garrett N, Lalatsa K, Serrano D, Summers I, Moger J, Stapleton P, Satchi-Fainaro R, Schätzlein AG, Uchegbu IF. Lomustine Nanoparticles Enable Both Bone Marrow Sparing and High Brain Drug Levels - A Strategy for Brain Cancer Treatments. Pharm Res 2016; 33:1289-303. [PMID: 26903051 PMCID: PMC4820487 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-016-1872-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2015] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The blood brain barrier compromises glioblastoma chemotherapy. However high blood concentrations of lipophilic, alkylating drugs result in brain uptake, but cause myelosuppression. We hypothesised that nanoparticles could achieve therapeutic brain concentrations without dose-limiting myelosuppression. METHODS Mice were dosed with either intravenous lomustine Molecular Envelope Technology (MET) nanoparticles (13 mg kg(-1)) or ethanolic lomustine (6.5 mg kg(-1)) and tissues analysed. Efficacy was assessed in an orthotopic U-87 MG glioblastoma model, following intravenous MET lomustine (daily 13 mg kg(-1)) or ethanolic lomustine (daily 1.2 mg kg(-1) - the highest repeated dose possible). Myelosuppression and MET particle macrophage uptake were also investigated. RESULTS The MET formulation resulted in modest brain targeting (brain/ bone AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.90 and 0.53 respectively and brain/ liver AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.24 and 0.15 respectively). The MET formulation significantly increased mice (U-87 MG tumours) survival times; with MET lomustine, ethanolic lomustine and untreated mean survival times of 33.2, 22.5 and 21.3 days respectively and there were no material treatment-related differences in blood and femoral cell counts. Macrophage uptake is slower for MET nanoparticles than for liposomes. CONCLUSIONS Particulate drug formulations improved brain tumour therapy without major bone marrow toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funmilola A Fisusi
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Adeline Siew
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Kar Wai Chooi
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Omotunde Okubanjo
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Natalie Garrett
- School of Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, UK
| | - Katerina Lalatsa
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Dolores Serrano
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Ian Summers
- School of Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, UK
| | - Julian Moger
- School of Physics, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, UK
| | - Paul Stapleton
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
| | - Ronit Satchi-Fainaro
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
| | - Andreas G Schätzlein
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK
- Nanomerics Ltd. Euro House, 1394 High Road, London, N20 9YZ, UK
| | - Ijeoma F Uchegbu
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
- Nanomerics Ltd. Euro House, 1394 High Road, London, N20 9YZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang H, Xu T, Jiang Y, Xu H, Yan Y, Fu D, Chen J. The challenges and the promise of molecular targeted therapy in malignant gliomas. Neoplasia 2015; 17:239-55. [PMID: 25810009 PMCID: PMC4372648 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Accepted: 02/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant gliomas are the most common malignant primary brain tumors and one of the most challenging forms of cancers to treat. Despite advances in conventional treatment, the outcome for patients remains almost universally fatal. This poor prognosis is due to therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence after surgical removal. However, over the past decade, molecular targeted therapy has held the promise of transforming the care of malignant glioma patients. Significant progress in understanding the molecular pathology of gliomagenesis and maintenance of the malignant phenotypes will open opportunities to rationally develop new molecular targeted therapy options. Recently, therapeutic strategies have focused on targeting pro-growth signaling mediated by receptor tyrosine kinase/RAS/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway, proangiogenic pathways, and several other vital intracellular signaling networks, such as proteasome and histone deacetylase. However, several factors such as cross-talk between the altered pathways, intratumoral molecular heterogeneity, and therapeutic resistance of glioma stem cells (GSCs) have limited the activity of single agents. Efforts are ongoing to study in depth the complex molecular biology of glioma, develop novel regimens targeting GSCs, and identify biomarkers to stratify patients with the individualized molecular targeted therapy. Here, we review the molecular alterations relevant to the pathology of malignant glioma, review current advances in clinical targeted trials, and discuss the challenges, controversies, and future directions of molecular targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongxiang Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hanchong Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Yan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Da Fu
- Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
| | - Juxiang Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
In almost all patients, malignant glioma recurs following initial treatment with maximal safe resection, conformal radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This review describes the many options for treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas, including reoperation, alternating electric field therapy, chemotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery, or some combination of these modalities, presenting the evidence for each approach. No standard of care has been established, though the antiangiogenic agent, bevacizumab; stereotactic radiotherapy or radiosurgery; and, perhaps, combined treatment with these 2 modalities appear to offer modest benefits over other approaches. Clearly, randomized trials of these options would be advantageous, and novel, more efficacious approaches are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
| | - John H Sampson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC; Department of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alifieris C, Trafalis DT. Glioblastoma multiforme: Pathogenesis and treatment. Pharmacol Ther 2015; 152:63-82. [PMID: 25944528 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 496] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Each year, about 5-6 cases out of 100,000 people are diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors, of which about 80% are malignant gliomas (MGs). Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) accounts for more than half of MG cases. They are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite current multimodality treatment efforts including maximal surgical resection if feasible, followed by a combination of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, the median survival is short: only about 15months. A deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of these tumors has presented opportunities for newer therapies to evolve and an expectation of better control of this disease. Lately, efforts have been made to investigate tumor resistance, which results from complex alternate signaling pathways, the existence of glioma stem-cells, the influence of the blood-brain barrier as well as the expression of 0(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. In this paper, we review up-to-date information on MGs treatment including current approaches, novel drug-delivering strategies, molecular targeted agents and immunomodulative treatments, and discuss future treatment perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dimitrios T Trafalis
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lassman AB, Pugh SL, Gilbert MR, Aldape KD, Geinoz S, Beumer JH, Christner SM, Komaki R, DeAngelis LM, Gaur R, Youssef E, Wagner H, Won M, Mehta MP. Phase 2 trial of dasatinib in target-selected patients with recurrent glioblastoma (RTOG 0627). Neuro Oncol 2015; 17:992-8. [PMID: 25758746 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2014] [Accepted: 01/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of dasatinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Eligibility requirements were Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60%; no concurrent hepatic enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants; prior treatment with surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide exclusively; and activation or overexpression of ≥ 2 putative dasatinib targets in GBM (ie, SRC, c-KIT, EPHA2, and PDGFR). Using a 2-stage design, 77 eligible participants (27 in stage 1, if favorable, and then 50 in stage 2) were needed to detect an absolute improvement in the proportion of patients either alive and progression-free patients at 6 months (6mPFS) or responding (any duration) from a historical 11% to 25%. RESULTS A high rate of ineligibility (27%) to stage 1 precluded a powered assessment of efficacy, but there was also infrequent treatment-related toxicity at 100 mg twice daily. Therefore, the study was redesigned to allow intrapatient escalation by 50 mg daily every cycle as tolerated (stage 1B) before determining whether to proceed to stage 2. Escalation was tolerable in 10 of 17 (59%) participants evaluable for that endpoint; however, among all eligible patients (stages 1 and 1B, n = 50), there were no radiographic responses, median overall survival was 7.9 months, median PFS was 1.7 months, and the 6mPFS rate was 6%. The clinical benefit was insufficient to correlate tested biomarkers with efficacy. The trial was closed without proceeding to stage 2. CONCLUSIONS Intraparticipant dose escalation was feasible, but dasatinib was ineffective in recurrent GBM. Clinical trials.gov identified. NCT00423735 (available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00423735).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Stephanie L Pugh
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Kenneth D Aldape
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Sandrine Geinoz
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Jan H Beumer
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Susan M Christner
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Lisa M DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Rakesh Gaur
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Emad Youssef
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Henry Wagner
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Minhee Won
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Neurology and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. current); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (A.B.L. during accrual, L.M.D.); NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (S.L.P., S.G., M.W); The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (M.R.G., K.D.A. during accrual; R.K.); Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (M.R.G. current); University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada (K.D.A. current); Cancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B., S.M.C.); Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (J.H.B.); NCI Community Oncology Research Program - Kansas City, Prairie Village, Kansas (R.G.); Arizona Oncology Services Foundation, Tucson, Arizona (E.Y.); Penn State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (H.W.); University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, Maryland (M.P.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Taylor JW, Dietrich J, Gerstner ER, Norden AD, Rinne ML, Cahill DP, Stemmer-Rachamimov A, Wen PY, Betensky RA, Giorgio DH, Snodgrass K, Randall AE, Batchelor TT, Chi AS. Phase 2 study of bosutinib, a Src inhibitor, in adults with recurrent glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2015; 121:557-63. [PMID: 25411098 PMCID: PMC4323868 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1667-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2014] [Accepted: 11/13/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Tumor cell infiltration is a major mechanism of treatment escape in glioblastoma. Src is an intracellular tyrosine kinase that mediates tumor cell motility and invasiveness. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of bosutinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently inhibits Src and Abl, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. In this two-arm study, patients with histologically confirmed recurrent glioblastoma and ≤2 relapses, not previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, were administered oral bosutinib 400 mg daily. Arm A planned for 6 patients who were candidates for surgical resection to be given bosutinib for 7-9 days prior to resection. Arm B was a two-stage design phase 2 trial targeting 30 patients. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) in Arm B. After 9 patients enrolled onto stage 1 of Arm B, 9 (100 %) patients progressed within 6 months. Therefore, the study met the pre-specified criteria for early closure and both Arms were closed. In Arm B, Median PFS was 7.71 weeks and median OS was 50 weeks. Best objective response was stable disease in one patient (11.1 %). Seven patients (77.8 %) had treatment-related AEs of any grade and 2 (22.2 %) were grade ≥3. Arm A was closed after 2 patients enrolled. Src activation was evident in all archival tumor samples. Bosutinib monotherapy does not appear to be effective in recurrent glioblastoma. However, Src remains a potential target based on its upregulation in tumor samples and role in glioma invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie W Taylor
- Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Despite decades of advancing science and clinical trials, average survival remains dismal for individuals with high-grade gliomas. Our understanding of the genetic and molecular aberrations that contribute to the aggressive nature of these tumors is continually growing, as is our ability to target such specific traits. Herein, we review the major classes of such targeted therapies, as well as the relevant clinical trial outcomes regarding their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T Jordan
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
The survival outcome of patients with malignant gliomas is still poor, despite advances in surgical techniques, radiation therapy and the development of novel chemotherapeutic agents. The heterogeneity of molecular alterations in signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of these tumors contributes significantly to their resistance to treatment. Several molecular targets for therapy have been discovered over the last several years. Therapeutic agents targeting these signaling pathways may provide more effective treatments and may improve survival. This review summarizes the important molecular therapeutic targets and the outcome of published clinical trials involving targeted therapeutic agents in glioma patients.
Collapse
|
46
|
Bastien JIL, McNeill KA, Fine HA. Molecular characterizations of glioblastoma, targeted therapy, and clinical results to date. Cancer 2014; 121:502-16. [PMID: 25250735 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2014] [Revised: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
During the last decade, extensive multiplatform genome-wide analysis has yielded a wealth of knowledge regarding the genetic and molecular makeup of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). These profiling studies support the emerging view that GBM comprises a group of highly heterogeneous tumor types, each with its own distinct molecular and genetic signatures. This heterogeneity complicates the process of defining reliable intertumor/intratumor biological states, which will ultimately be needed for classifying tumors and for designing effective customized therapies that target resultant disease pathways. The increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of GBM has brought the hope and expectation that such knowledge will lead to better and more rational therapies directed toward specific molecular targets. To date, however, these expectations have largely been unrealized. This review discusses some of the principal genetic and epigenetic aberrations found in GBM that appear promising for targeted therapies now and in the near future, and it offers suggestions for future directions concerning the rather disappointing results of clinical trials to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayson I L Bastien
- Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Dasatinib is an orally available short-acting dual ABL/SRC tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It potently inhibits BCR-ABL and SRC family kinases (SRC, LCK, YES, FYN), but also c-KIT, PDGFR-α and PDGFR-β, and ephrin receptor kinase. Dasatinib is an effective treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Both diseases are characterized by a constitutively active tyrosine kinase; BCR-ABL. Dasatinib inhibits BCR-ABL with greater potency compared with other BCR-ABL inhibitors and is active in CML resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Dasatinib is approved for the treatment of CML (all phases) and for the treatment of Ph+ ALL, resistant or intolerant to prior imatinib treatment. Randomized trial data in CML show that first-line dasatinib provides superior responses compared with imatinib and enables patients to achieve early, deep responses, correlated with improved longer-term outcomes. A once-daily dose of 100 mg in chronic phase CML results in high hematologic and molecular remission rates and prolongation of survival. In accelerated and blastic phase of CML, as well as in Ph+ ALL, complete hematologic and cytogenetic remissions frequently occur. Remissions however are very short. In these patients, once-daily 140 mg is the recommended dose. The effect of dasatinib in other malignancies including solid tumors is subject of clinical studies. Regardless of many clinical trials in different tumor types and in different combinations of dasatinib with other agents, the role of dasatinib in the treatment of solid tumors has not yet been defined. Side effects of dasatinib are frequent but mostly moderate and manageable and include cytopenias and pleural effusions. The review presents the preclinical and clinical activity of dasatinib with a focus on clinical studies in CML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Lindauer
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum am Gesundbrunnen, Am Gesundbrunnen 20-24, 74078, Heilbronn, Germany,
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
A conceptually new treatment approach for relapsed glioblastoma: coordinated undermining of survival paths with nine repurposed drugs (CUSP9) by the International Initiative for Accelerated Improvement of Glioblastoma Care. Oncotarget 2013; 4:502-30. [PMID: 23594434 PMCID: PMC3720600 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve prognosis in recurrent glioblastoma we developed a treatment protocol based on a combination of drugs not traditionally thought of as cytotoxic chemotherapy agents but that have a robust history of being well-tolerated and are already marketed and used for other non-cancer indications. Focus was on adding drugs which met these criteria: a) were pharmacologically well characterized, b) had low likelihood of adding to patient side effect burden, c) had evidence for interfering with a recognized, well-characterized growth promoting element of glioblastoma, and d) were coordinated, as an ensemble had reasonable likelihood of concerted activity against key biological features of glioblastoma growth. We found nine drugs meeting these criteria and propose adding them to continuous low dose temozolomide, a currently accepted treatment for relapsed glioblastoma, in patients with recurrent disease after primary treatment with the Stupp Protocol. The nine adjuvant drug regimen, Coordinated Undermining of Survival Paths, CUSP9, then are aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, copper gluconate, disulfiram, ketoconazole, nelfinavir, sertraline, to be added to continuous low dose temozolomide. We discuss each drug in turn and the specific rationale for use- how each drug is expected to retard glioblastoma growth and undermine glioblastoma's compensatory mechanisms engaged during temozolomide treatment. The risks of pharmacological interactions and why we believe this drug mix will increase both quality of life and overall survival are reviewed.
Collapse
|
49
|
DRR regulates AKT activation to drive brain cancer invasion. Oncogene 2013; 33:4952-60. [PMID: 24141773 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2013.436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2013] [Revised: 08/02/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and invasive adult brain cancer. The rapid invasion of cancer cells into the normal brain is a major cause of treatment failure, yet the mechanisms that regulate this process are poorly understood. We have identified a novel mechanism of brain cancer invasion. We show that downregulated in renal cell carcinoma (DRR), which is newly expressed in invasive gliomas, recruits AKT to focal adhesions. This DRR- induced pathological relocalization of AKT bypasses commonly altered upstream signaling events and leads to AKT activation and invasion. We also developed an oligonucleotide therapeutic that reduces DRR expression and prevents glioma invasion in an in vivo preclinical model of the disease. Our findings identify DRR as a novel GBM target and show that oligonucleotides targeting DRR is a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of DRR-positive GBMs.
Collapse
|
50
|
MicroRNA-650 expression in glioma is associated with prognosis of patients. J Neurooncol 2013; 115:375-80. [PMID: 24062138 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1243-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2013] [Accepted: 09/06/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
MicroRNAs are known as non-coding RNAs that regulate the expression of target mRNA. Accumulating evidence has indicated that microRNA expression in human malignancies can be utilized as a prognostic marker for patients. However, the prognostic value of miR-650 in human glioma has not been investigated yet. In the present investigation, we have recruited 168 cases glioma specimens and 21 normal control brain specimens. Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out to investigate the expression of miR-650. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association of miR-650 with prognosis of glioma patients. Results showed that miR-650 expression was increased in glioma compared with normal control specimens (P < 0.001). It was also found that miR-650 expression was related to World Health Organization grade and Karnofsky performance score (KPS) for high expression was more frequently detected in glioma of high grade or low KPS score (P < 0.001). The prognosis of glioma with high miR-650 expression was significantly worse compared with that of glioma with low miR-650 expression. These results proved that miR-650 expression was a significant prognostic indicator in glioma, which may suggest new management of human glioma.
Collapse
|