Is there a role for early chemotherapy in the management of pituitary adenomas?

Establishment of Human Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Derived Organoid and Its Pilot Application for Drug Screening

CONTEXT

Precision medicine for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) is limited by the lack of reliable research models.

OBJECTIVE

To generate patient-derived organoids (PDOs), which could serve as a platform for personalized drug screening for PitNET patients.

DESIGN

From July 2019 to May 2022, a total of 32 human PitNET specimens were collected for the establishment of organoids with an optimized culture protocol.

SETTING

This study was conducted at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

PitNET patients who were pathologically confirmed were enrolled in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

Histological staining and whole-exome sequencing were utilized to confirm the pathologic and genomic features of PDOs. A drug response assay on PDOs was also performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

PDOs retained key genetic and morphological features of their parental tumors.

RESULTS

PDOs were successfully established from various types of PitNET samples with an overall success rate of 87.5%. Clinical nonfunctioning PitNETs-derived organoids (22/23, 95.7%) showed a higher likelihood of successful generation compared to those from functioning PitNETs (6/9, 66.7%). Preservation of cellular structure, subtype-specific neuroendocrine profiles, mutational features, and tumor microenvironment heterogeneity from parental tumors was observed. A distinctive response profile in drug tests was observed among the organoids from patients with different subtypes of PitNETs. With the validation of key characteristics from parental tumors in histological, genomic, and microenvironment heterogeneity consistency assays, we demonstrated the predictive value of the PDOs in testing individual drugs.

CONCLUSION

The established PDOs, retaining typical features of parental tumors, indicate a translational significance in innovating personalized treatment for refractory PitNETs.

Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: From Pathology to Treatment

Aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs) are heterogeneous with regard to clinical presentation, proliferative markers, clinical course, and response to therapy. Half of them show an aggressive course only many years after the first apparently benign presentation. APTs and PCs share several properties, but a Ki67 index greater than or equal to 10% and extensive p53 expression are more prevalent in PCs. Mutations in TP53 and ATRX are the most common genetic alterations; their detection might be of value for early identification of aggressiveness. Treatment requires a multimodal approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Temozolomide is the recommended first-line chemotherapy, with response rates of about 40%. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as second-line treatment in PCs, with currently no evidence for a superior effect of dual therapy compared to monotherapy with PD-1 blockers. Bevacizumab has resulted in partial response (PR) in few patients; tyrosine kinase inhibitors and everolimus have generally not been useful. The effect of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is limited as well. Management of APT/PC is challenging and should be discussed within an expert team with consideration of clinical and pathological findings, age, and general condition of the patient. Considering that APT/PCs are rare, new therapies should preferably be evaluated in shared standardized protocols. Prognostic and predictive markers to guide treatment decisions are needed and are the scope of ongoing research.

Knowing when to discontinue Temozolomide therapy in responding aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas: a systematic review and Padua (Italy) case series

INTRODUCTION

Pituitary adenomas can show a tendency to grow, despite multimodal treatment. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been used in the last 15 years in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors. TMZ requires a careful balance of different expertise, especially for selection criteria.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted: (1) a systematic review of the published literature from 2006 to 2022, collecting only cases with a complete description of patient follow-up after TMZ discontinuation; (2) a description of all patients with aggressive pituitary adenoma or carcinoma treated in Padua (Italy).

EXPERT OPINION

There is considerable heterogeneity in the literature: TMZ cycles duration ranged from 3 to 47 months; the follow-up time after TMZ discontinuation ranged from 4 to 91 months (mean 24 months, median 18 months), at least a stable disease has been reported in 75% of patients after a mean 13 months (range 3-47 months, median 10 months). The Padua (Italy) cohort reflects the literature. Future directions to explore are to understand the pathophysiological mechanism of TMZ resistance escape, to develop predicting factors to TMZ treatment (especially through the delineation of the underlying transformation processes), and to further expand the therapeutic applications of TMZ (as neoadjuvant, combined with radiotherapy).

Identification and validation of neurotrophic factor-related gene signatures in glioblastoma and Parkinson's disease

Background

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common cancer of the central nervous system, while Parkinson's disease (PD) is a degenerative neurological condition frequently affecting the elderly. Neurotrophic factors are key factors associated with the progression of degenerative neuropathies and gliomas.

Methods

The 2601 neurotrophic factor-related genes (NFRGs) available in the Genecards portal were analyzed and 12 NFRGs with potential roles in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease and the prognosis of GBM were identified. LASSO regression and random forest algorithms were then used to screen the key NFRGs. The correlation of the key NFRGs with immune pathways was verified using GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis). A prognostic risk scoring system was constructed using LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) and multivariate Cox risk regression based on the expression of the 12 NFRGs in the GBM cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We also investigated differences in clinical characteristics, mutational landscape, immune cell infiltration, and predicted efficacy of immunotherapy between risk groups. Finally, the accuracy of the model genes was validated using multi-omics mutation analysis, single-cell sequencing, QT-PCR, and HPA.

Results

We found that 4 NFRGs were more reliable for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease through the use of machine learning techniques. These results were validated using two external cohorts. We also identified 7 NFRGs that were highly associated with the prognosis and diagnosis of GBM. Patients in the low-risk group had a greater overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group. The nomogram generated based on clinical characteristics and risk scores showed strong prognostic prediction ability. The NFRG signature was an independent prognostic predictor for GBM. The low-risk group was more likely to benefit from immunotherapy based on the degree of immune cell infiltration, expression of immune checkpoints (ICs), and predicted response to immunotherapy. In the end, 2 NFRGs (EN1 and LOXL1) were identified as crucial for the development of Parkinson's disease and the outcome of GBM.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that 4 NFRGs are involved in the progression of PD. The 7-NFRGs risk score model can predict the prognosis of GBM patients and help clinicians to classify the GBM patients into high and low risk groups. EN1, and LOXL1 can be used as therapeutic targets for personalized immunotherapy for patients with PD and GBM.

Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: current practices, controversies, and perspectives, on behalf of the EANS skull base section

Aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (APT) account for 10% of pituitary tumors. Their management is a rapidly evolving field of clinical research and has led pituitary teams to shift toward a neuro-oncological-like approach. The new terminology "Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors" (PitNet) that was recently proposed to replace "pituitary adenomas" reflects this change of paradigm. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a state of the art of actual knowledge, controversies, and recommendations in the management of APT. We propose an overview of current prognostic markers, including the recent five-tiered clinicopathological classification. We further establish and discuss the following recommendations from a neurosurgical perspective: (i) surgery and multi-staged surgeries (without or with parasellar resection in symptomatic patients) should be discussed at each stage of the disease, because it may potentialize adjuvant medical therapies; (ii) temozolomide is effective in most patients, although 30% of patients are non-responders and the optimal timeline to initiate and interrupt this treatment remains questionable; (iii) some patients with selected clinicopathological profiles may benefit from an earlier local radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy; (iv) novel therapies such as VEGF-targeted therapies and anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD1 immunotherapies are promising and should be discussed as 2nd or 3rd line of treatment. Finally, whether neurosurgeons have to operate on "pituitary adenomas" or "PitNets," their role and expertise remain crucial at each stage of the disease, prompting our community to deal with evolving concepts and therapeutic resources.

Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas

Although usually benign, anterior pituitary tumours occasionally exhibit aggressive behaviour, with invasion of surrounding tissues, rapid growth, resistance to conventional treatments and multiple recurrences. In very rare cases, they metastasize and are termed pituitary carcinomas. The time between a 'classical' pituitary tumour and a pituitary carcinoma can be years, which means that monitoring should be performed regularly in patients with clinical (invasion and/or tumour growth) or pathological (Ki67 index, mitotic count and/or p53 detection) markers suggesting aggressiveness. However, although both invasion and proliferation have prognostic value, such parameters cannot predict outcome or malignancy without metastasis. Future research should focus on the biology of both tumour cells and their microenvironment, hopefully with improved therapeutic outcomes. Currently, the initial therapeutic approach for aggressive pituitary tumours is generally to repeat surgery or radiotherapy in expert centres. Standard medical treatments usually have no effect on tumour progression but they can be maintained on a long-term basis to, at least partly, control hypersecretion. In cases where standard treatments prove ineffective, temozolomide, the sole formally recommended treatment, is effective in only one-third of patients. Personalized use of emerging therapies, including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, angiogenesis-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, will hopefully improve the outcomes of patients with this severe condition.

Temozolomide cytoreductive treatment in a giant cabergoline-resistant prolactin-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor

Dopamine agonists (DAs, especially cabergoline) are recommended as first-line treatment in patients with prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas, to reduce hormone secretion and tumor size. Pituitary surgery, suggested in nonresponsive patients, cannot achieve a gross total resection or is not feasible in some cases. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been proposed in patients with aggressive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) who do not respond to conventional treatments. We present a 47-year-old man with a giant (70×51×64 mm) prolactin-secreting PitNET. Cabergoline treatment (at first 1.5 mg/week, and then increased to 3.5 mg/week after 3 months) achieved prolactin suppression; however, magnetic resonance revealed a stable mass. After explanation of surgical complications, the patient rejected the procedure. Therefore, a primary neoadjuvant cytoreductive TMZ treatment was discussed during a meeting of the Pituitary Multidisciplinary Team, and added to cabergoline. After 13 cycles of TMZ (1 year of treatment), we observed dramatic reduction of the PitNET (from 18 cm of adenoma to 6 cm of necrotic tissue). MRI performed 4, 12, and 18 months after TMZ discontinuation revealed a stable residual PitNET, and 1.5 mg/week of cabergoline has been continued until today. Recently, the criteria for developing Pituitary Tumors Centers of Excellence have been proposed, indicating that a multidisciplinary team is the best care for patients. Surgery, rejected by the patient, could only achieve a partial resection; therefore, we decided to combine TMZ and cabergoline. An early initiation of TMZ could be considered in selected cases, especially when surgery could be only partially effective.

Precision Therapy in Acromegaly Caused by Pituitary Tumors: How Close Is It to Reality?

Acromegaly presents with an enigmatic range of symptoms and comorbidities caused by chronic and progressive growth hormone elevations, commonly due to endocrinologic hypersecretion from a pituitary gland tumor. Comprehensive national acromegaly databases have been appearing over the years, allowing for international comparisons of data, although still presenting varying prevalence and incidence rates. Lack of large-scale analysis in geographical and ethnic differences in clinical presentation and management requires further research. Assessment of current and novel predictors of responsiveness to distinct therapy can lead to multilevel categorization of patients, allowing integration into new clinical guidelines and reduction of increased morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly. This review compares current data from epidemiological studies and assesses the present-day application of prognostic factors in medical practice, the reality of precision therapy, as well as its future prospects in acromegaly, with a special focus on its relevance to the South Korean population.

Are aggressive pituitary tumors and carcinomas two sides of the same coin? Pathologists reply to clinician's questions

Pituitary adenohypophyseal tumors are considered as benign and termed "adenomas". However, many tumors are invasive and a proportion of these exhibit an "aggressive behavior" with premature death due to progressive growth. Only very rare (0.2%) tumors with metastases are considered malignant and termed "carcinomas". Taking into account this variability in behavior and the oncological definition, pathologists have proposed changing the term adenoma to tumor. Here we explain why use the term tumor instead of adenoma and identify tumor characteristics, associated with a high risk for poor prognosis. In a cohort of 125 tumors with aggressive behavior (APT) and 40 carcinomas with metastases (PC), clinical and pathological features were very similar. The comparison of this cohort (APT+PC) with a reference surgical cohort of 374 unselected patients clearly shows that the two cohorts differ greatly, especially the percentage of tumors with Ki67 ≥ 10% (35%vs3%; p < 0.001). A five-tiered prognostic classification, associating invasion and proliferation, identified grade 2b tumors (invasive and proliferative), with a high risk of recurrence/progression. Because half of the APT+ PC tumors have a Ki67 index ≥10%, and 80% of them show 2 or 3 positive markers of proliferation, we suggest that tumors that are clinically aggressive, invasive and highly proliferative with a Ki67 ≥ 10%, represent tumors with malignant potential. The percentage of grade 2b tumors, suspected of malignancy, which will become aggressive tumors or carcinomas is unknown. It is probably very low, but higher than 0.2% in surgical series. Early identification and active treatment of these aggressive tumors is needed to decrease morbidity and prolong survival.

Comparison of Radiographic Approaches to Assess Treatment Response in Pituitary Adenomas: Is RECIST or RANO Good Enough?

Context

Pituitary adenomas (PA) are often irregularly shaped, particularly posttreatment. There are no standardized radiographic criteria for assessing treatment response, substantially complicating interpretation of prospective outcome data. Existing imaging frameworks for intracranial tumors assume perfectly spherical targets and may be suboptimal.

Objective

To compare a three-dimensional (3D) volumetric approach against accepted surrogate measurements to assess PA posttreatment response (PTR).

Design

Retrospective review of patients with available pre- and postradiotherapy (RT) imaging. A neuroradiologist determined tumor sizes in one dimensional (1D) per Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria, two dimensional (2D) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, and 3D estimates assuming a perfect sphere or perfect ellipsoid. Each tumor was manually segmented for 3D volumetric measurements. The Hakon Wadell method was used to calculate sphericity.

Setting

Tertiary cancer center.

Patients or Other Participants

Patients (n = 34, median age = 50 years; 50% male) with PA and MRI scans before and after sellar RT.

Interventions

Patients received sellar RT for intact or surgically resected lesions.

Main Outcome Measures

Radiographic PTR, defined as percent tumor size change.

Results

Using 3D volumetrics, mean sphericity = 0.63 pre-RT and 0.60 post-RT. With all approaches, most patients had stable disease on post-RT scan. PTR for 1D, 2D, and 3D spherical measurements were moderately well correlated with 3D volumetrics (e.g., for 1D: 0.66, P < 0.0001) and were superior to 3D ellipsoid. Intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrated moderate to good reliability for 1D, 2D, and 3D sphere (P < 0.001); 3D ellipsoid was inferior (P = 0.009). 3D volumetrics identified more potential partially responding and progressive lesions.

Conclusions

Although PAs are irregularly shaped, 1D and 2D approaches are adequately correlated with volumetric assessment.

Identification of Novel Genes Involved in the Pathogenesis of an ACTH-Secreting Pituitary Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Pituitary carcinomas (PCs) is considerable uncommon entities with a poor prognosis that represents only 0. 1–0.2% of all pituitary tumors. There are fewer than 150 reported cases up to now. In addition, the molecular pathogenesis leading to malignant pituitary transformation remain unclear due to the rarity of PCs. Here we present an uncommon case of ACTH-secreting PCs and explore the gene mutation following pituitary adenoma transformation. Our detailed clinical, histopathological and molecular detection data suggest that novel genes of ATRX and PTEN were implicated in the pathogenesis of PCs by searching Pubmed and the Web of Science databases as well as Cosmic databank. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented rare PCs patient with novel gene mutations that included ATRX and PTEN in addition to TP53. Present finding may therefore provide significant information for targeted therapy of PCs.

65 YEARS OF THE DOUBLE HELIX: Treatment of pituitary tumors with temozolomide: an update

Temozolomide is an alkylating chemotherapeutic agent used in malignant neuroendocrine neoplasia, melanoma, brain metastases and an essential component of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Since 2006, it has been used for the treatment of pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary adenomas. Here, we discuss the current indications and results of temozolomide therapy in pituitary tumors, as well as frequently asked questions regarding temozolomide treatment, duration of therapy, dosage, tumor recurrence and resistance.

Temozolomide and Pituitary Tumors: Current Understanding, Unresolved Issues, and Future Directions

Temozolomide, an alkylating agent, initially used in the treatment of gliomas was expanded to include pituitary tumors in 2006. After 12 years of use, temozolomide has shown a notable advancement in pituitary tumor treatment with a remarkable improvement rate in the 5-year overall survival and 5-year progression-free survival in both aggressive pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas. In this paper, we review the mechanism of action of temozolomide as alkylating agent, its interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid repair systems, therapeutic effects in pituitary tumors, unresolved issues, and future directions relating to new possibilities of targeted therapy.

Pituitary Adenomas Presenting as Sinonasal or Nasopharyngeal Masses: A Case Series Illustrating Potential Diagnostic Pitfalls

We present a series of nonectopic pituitary adenomas presenting as polypoid sinonasal or nasopharyngeal masses. Thirteen cases diagnosed by biopsies from the nasal cavity, sinuses, or nasopharynx were identified from a series of 1288 surgical pituitary specimens. The patients included 5 men and 8 women ranging from 29 to 69 years of age. The presentations included nasal obstruction (4 cases), headaches (3), visual defects (2), recurrent nose bleeds (1), rhinorrhea (1), sepsis (1), fatigue (1), and hyperthyroidism (1). All patients had large tumors involving the sella and extending inferiorly to involve the sphenoid sinus in 10 cases, ethmoid in 8, nasopharynx in 3, nasal cavity in 6, maxillary and frontal sinuses in 1 case each. In 3 patients, the biopsy was from the nasopharynx, in 4 from the nasal cavity, in 4 from the sphenoid sinus, and in 2 from the ethmoid sinus. The correct diagnosis of pituitary adenoma was initially made in 10 cases. In 3 cases the initial diagnosis was incorrect; 2 tumors were classified as olfactory neuroblastoma, one of those was reclassified as neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 1 case was initially diagnosed as neuroendocrine carcinoma with aberrant adrenocorticotrophic hormone expression. Clinical follow-up (2 to 25 y) and treatment information was available in 10 cases. All 10 patients were alive, either free of disease (4 cases) or with disease (6 cases). In 2 cases, the wrong diagnoses led to incorrect treatment with significant morbidity. These cases illustrate that pituitary adenomas can invade nasopharynx and sinonasal cavities and when they do, they present a possible diagnostic pitfall with potentially serious consequences. We demonstrate the need to always consider this entity when encountering a nasopharyngeal or sinonasal tumor with neuroendocrine features.

Temozolomide therapy for aggressive functioning pituitary adenomas refractory to surgery and radiation: a case series

Background

Treatment of aggressive pituitary adenomas typically involves a multimodality approach based on histopathological features and may include pharmacotherapy, surgery, and occasionally radiation therapy. In cases of treatment-refractory tumor progression, chemotherapy may be considered; however, no standard chemotherapeutic regimen has been established. Literature review suggests that temozolomide may have a beneficial role in a subset of cases. To understand the efficacy of temozolomide in progressive pituitary tumors, we reviewed the outcomes of cases at our center.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review to report the outcome and unique features of 7 patients with aggressive functioning pituitary adenomas or carcinomas treated with temozolomide. Tumor pathology included somatotroph (n = 1), corticotroph (n = 3), and lactotroph (n = 3) tumors.

Results

Four of the 7 patients had at least 2 prior resections, and all had prior radiation and surgery before treatment with temozolomide. Notably, all patients showed response to therapy, defined as either stable disease (43%) or partial response (57%). Median progression-free survival was 1.66 years, and median overall survival was 4 years.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that temozolomide has an important role in the management of aggressive functioning pituitary tumors that are resistant to standard therapies, and that optimization of therapy with temozolomide may involve individualized regimens. Future prospective clinical trials should be considered.

How effective is temozolomide for treating pituitary tumours and when should it be used?

Temozolomide (TMZ) has been shown as an effective treatment option in aggressive pituitary adenomas and carcinomas. This review analyses the published case series and demonstrates 42 % of patents show a radiological response and 27 % experience stable disease following TMZ. Prolactinomas and corticotroph tumours respond best to TMZ, showing approximately a 50 % response rate, with non-functioning tumours responding only half as frequently. Other factors that may predict the tumour's TMZ response include MGMT and MSH status, but neither is sufficiently robust to determine treatment decisions. TMZ has an accepted role in treating pituitary carcinoma and adenomas if radiation and surgery have failed to control tumour growth. To use TMZ on the basis of anticipated future aggression, as a primary therapy, or in preference to radiotherapy remains controversial.

Improvements in Clinical Trials Information Will Improve the Reproductive Health and Fertility of Cancer Patients

There are a number of barriers that result in cancer patients not being referred for oncofertility care, which include knowledge about reproductive risks of antineoplastic agents. Without this information, clinicians do not always make recommendations for oncofertility care. The objective of this study was to describe the level of reproductive information and recommendations that clinicians have available in clinical trial protocols regarding oncofertility management and follow-up, and the information that patients may receive in clinical trials patient information sheets or consent forms. A literature review of the 71 antineoplastic drugs included in the 68 clinical trial protocols showed that 68% of the antineoplastic drugs had gonadotoxic animal data, 32% had gonadotoxic human data, 83% had teratogenic animal data, and 32% had teratogenic human data. When the clinical trial protocols were reviewed, only 22% of the protocols reported the teratogenic risks and 32% of the protocols reported the gonadotoxic risk. Only 56% of phase 3 protocols had gonadotoxic information and 13% of phase 3 protocols had teratogenic information. Nine percent of the protocols provided fertility preservation recommendations and 4% provided reproductive information in the follow-up and survivorship period. Twenty-six percent had a section in the clinical trials protocol, which identified oncofertility information easily. When gonadotoxic and teratogenic effects of treatment were known, they were not consistently included in the clinical trial protocols and the lack of data for new drugs was not reported. Very few protocols gave recommendations for oncofertility management and follow-up following the completion of cancer treatment. The research team proposes a number of recommendations that should be required for clinicians and pharmaceutical companies developing new trials.