Short delay in initiation of radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma-effect of concurrent chemotherapy: a secondary analysis from the NRG Oncology/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group database

The impact of cancer patient pathway on timing of radiotherapy and survival: a cohort study in glioblastoma patients

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor in which primary therapy is standardized and consists of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. However, the optimal time from surgery to start of RT is unknown. A high-grade glioma cancer patient pathway (CPP) was implemented in Norway in 2015 to avoid non-medical delays and regional disparity, and to optimize information flow to patients. This study investigated how CPP affected time to RT after surgery and overall survival.

METHODS

This study included consecutive GBM patients diagnosed in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority from 2006 to 2019 and treated with RT. The pre CPP implementation group constituted patients diagnosed 2006-2014, and the post CPP implementation group constituted patients diagnosed 2016-2019. We evaluated timing of RT and survival in relation to CPP implementation.

RESULTS

A total of 1212 patients with GBM were included. CPP implementation was associated with significantly better outcomes (p < 0.001). Median overall survival was 12.9 months. The odds of receiving RT within four weeks after surgery were significantly higher post CPP implementation (p < 0.001). We found no difference in survival dependent on timing of RT below 4, 4-6 or more than 6 weeks (p = 0.349). Prognostic factors for better outcomes in adjusted analyses were female sex (p = 0.005), younger age (p < 0.001), solitary tumors (p = 0.008), gross total resection (p < 0.001), and higher RT dose (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CPP implementation significantly reduced time to start of postoperative RT. Survival was significantly longer in the period after the CPP implementation, however, timing of postoperative RT relative to time of surgery did not impact survival.

Autologous cell immunotherapy (IGV-001) with IGF-1R antisense oligonucleotide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients

Standard-of-care first-line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) is maximal safe surgical resection, then concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide, followed by maintenance temozolomide. IGV-001, the first product of the Goldspire™ platform, is a first-in-class autologous immunotherapeutic product that combines personalized whole tumor-derived cells with an antisense oligonucleotide (IMV-001) in implantable biodiffusion chambers, with the intent to induce a tumor-specific immune response in patients with ndGBM. Here, we describe the design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind, phase IIb trial evaluating IGV-001 compared with placebo, both followed by standard-of-care treatment in patients with ndGBM. The primary end point is progression-free survival, and key secondary end points include overall survival and safety.

The impact of timing of temozolomide chemoradiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma on patient overall survival: A multicenter retrospective study

Background

The optimal timing of initiating adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemoradiotherapy after surgery in patients with glioblastoma is contentious. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of adjuvant treatment affects their overall survival (OS).

Methods

Consecutive adult patients with histologically-confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with adjuvant TMZ chemoradiotherapy across all neurosurgical centers in Hong Kong between 2006 and 2020 were analyzed. The surgery-to-chemoradiotherapy (S-CRT) interval was defined as the date of the first surgery to the date of initiation of adjuvant TMZ chemoradiotherapy.

Results

Four hundred and forty-one patients were reviewed. The median S-CRT interval was 40 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 33-47) and the median overall survival (mOS) was 16.7 months (95% CI: 15.9-18.2). The median age was 58 years (IQR: 50-63). Multivariable Cox regression with restricted cubic splines identified a nonlinear relationship between the S-CRT interval and mOS. Post hoc analysis-derived S-CRT intervals revealed that early CRT (<5 weeks; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.11; 95% CI 0.90-1.37) or late CRT (>9-12 weeks; aHR 1.07; 95% CI 0.67-1.71) were not significantly associated with OS. Subgroup analyses for the extent of resection (EOR) and pMGMT methylation status revealed no significant difference in treatment timing on OS.

Conclusion

The timing of adjuvant TMZ chemoradiotherapy, if commenced within 12 weeks after glioblastoma diagnosis, did not influence OS regardless of EOR or pMGMT methylation status. Clinical judgment should be exercised in optimizing the timing of initiating adjuvant therapy.

Impact of radiotherapy delay following biopsy for patients with unresected glioblastoma

OBJECTIVE

Because of the aggressive nature of glioblastoma, patients with unresected disease are encouraged to begin radiotherapy within approximately 1 month after craniotomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy with overall survival in patients with unresected glioblastoma.

METHODS

Patients with unresected glioblastoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 who received adjuvant radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database. Demographic and clinical data were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling.

RESULTS

Among 3456 patients with unresected glioblastoma, initiation of radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy was associated with a higher hazard of death compared with later initiation of radiotherapy. After excluding patients who received radiotherapy within 3 weeks of biopsy to minimize the effects of confounders associated with short time intervals from biopsy to radiotherapy, the median interval from biopsy to radiotherapy was 32 days (IQR 27-39 days). Overall, 1782 (66.82%) patients started radiotherapy within 5 weeks of biopsy, and 885 (33.18%) patients started radiotherapy beyond 5 weeks of biopsy. On multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.374).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unresected glioblastoma, a longer time interval from biopsy to radiotherapy does not appear to be associated with worse overall survival. However, external validation of these findings is necessary given that selection bias is a significant limitation of this study.

Association of perioperative adverse events with subsequent therapy and overall survival in patients with WHO grade III and IV gliomas

Background

Maximum safe resection followed by chemoradiotherapy as current standard of care for WHO grade III and IV gliomas can be influenced by the occurrence of perioperative adverse events (AE). The aim of this study was to determine the association of AE with the timing and choice of subsequent treatments as well as with overall survival (OS).

Methods

Prospectively collected data of 283 adult patients undergoing surgery for WHO grade III and IV gliomas at the University Hospital Zurich between January 2013 and June 2017 were analyzed. We assessed basic patient characteristics, KPS, extent of resection, and WHO grade, and we classified AE as well as modality, timing of subsequent treatment (delay, interruption, or non-initiation), and OS.

Results

In 117 patients (41%), an AE was documented between surgery and the 3-month follow-up. There was a significant association of AE with an increased time to initiation of subsequent therapy (p = 0.005) and a higher rate of interruption (p < 0.001) or non-initiation (p < 0.001). AE grades correlated with time to initiation of subsequent therapy (p = 0.038). AEs were associated with shorter OS in univariate analysis (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

AEs are associated with delayed and/or altered subsequent therapy and can therefore limit OS. These data emphasize the importance of safety within the maximum-safe-resection concept.

Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glioblastoma is the commonest primary brain cancer in adults whose outcomes are amongst the worst of any cancer. The current treatment pathway comprises surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy though unresectable diffusely infiltrative tumour cells remain untreated for several weeks post-diagnosis. Intratumoural heterogeneity combined with increased hypoxia in the postoperative tumour microenvironment potentially decreases the efficacy of adjuvant interventions and fails to prevent early postoperative regrowth, called rapid early progression (REP). In this review, we discuss the clinical implications and biological foundations of post-surgery REP. Subsequently, clinical interventions potentially targeting this phenomenon are reviewed systematically.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early interventions include early systemic chemotherapy, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, local therapies delivered during surgery (including Gliadel wafers, nanoparticles and stem cell therapy) and several radiotherapy techniques. We critically appraise and compare these strategies in terms of their efficacy, toxicity, challenges and potential to prolong survival. Finally, we discuss the most promising strategies that could benefit future glioblastoma patients. There is biological rationale to suggest that early interventions could improve the outcome of glioblastoma patients and they should be investigated in future trials.

Rapid early progression (REP) of glioblastoma is an independent negative prognostic factor: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, rapid early progression (REP) refers to tumor regrowth between surgery and postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised previously published data on REP to better characterize and understand it.

Methods

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from inception to October 21, 2021. Studies describing the incidence of REP-tumor growth between the postoperative MRI scan and pre-radiotherapy MRI scan in newly diagnosed glioblastoma were included. The primary outcome was REP incidence.

Results

From 1590 search results, 9 studies were included with 716 patients. The median age was 56.9 years (IQR 54.0-58.8 y). There was a male predominance with a median male-to-female ratio of 1.4 (IQR 1.1-1.5). The median number of days between MRI scans was 34 days (IQR 18-45 days). The mean incidence rate of REP was 45.9% (range 19.3%-72.0%) and significantly lower in studies employing functional imaging to define REP (P < .001). REP/non-REP groups were comparable with respect to age (P = .99), gender (P = .33) and time between scans (P = .81). REP was associated with shortened overall survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), shortened progression-free survival (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.30-2.43, P < .001), subtotal resection (OR 6.96, 95% CI 4.51-10.73, P < .001) and IDH wild-type versus mutant tumors (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.02-0.38, P = .03). MGMT promoter methylation was not associated with REP (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.28, P = .39).

Conclusions

REP occurs in almost half of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and has a strongly negative prognostic effect. Future studies should investigate its biology and effective treatment strategies.

Rapid Interval Recurrence of Glioblastoma Following Gross Total Resection: A Possible Indication for GammaTileⓇ Brachytherapy

Glioblastoma recurrence between initial resection and standard-of-care adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a negative prognostic factor in an already highly aggressive disease. Re-resection with GammaTileⓇ(GT Medical Technologies Inc., Tempe, AZ) placement affords expedited adjuvant radiation to mitigate the likelihood of such growth. Here, we report a glioblastoma patient who underwent re-resection and GammaTileⓇ (GT) placement within two months of the initial gross total resection due to regrowth that reached the size of the original presenting tumor. The patient subsequently received concurrent temozolomide and 60 Gy external beam to regions outside of the brachytherapy range, fulfilling the generally accepted Stupp regimen. The patient tolerated the treatment without complication. The dosimetrics and implications of the case presentation are reviewed.

Outcome Analysis and Prognostic Factors in Patients of Glioblastoma Multiforme: An Indonesian Single Institution Experience

Aims: This study was done to assess the survival of patients with glioblastoma multiform and to identify factors that can affect patient survival. Materials and methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, 55 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma multiform and received adjuvant radiation/chemoradiation in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The median overall survival (OS) for entire cohort was 13 months and 1-year OS and 2-year OS rate were 52.7% and 3.6% with the mean follow-up period was 12 months. In univariate analysis, age (≤50 years vs >50 years, p=0.02), performance status (≥90 vs 70-80 vs <70, p<0.001), RTOG RPA classification (class III vs class IV vs class V-VI, p<0.001), parietal lobes tumor site (vs others, p=0.02), residual tumor volume (≤20.4cm3 vs >20.4cm3, p=0.001) and time to initiate adjuvant therapy (<4 weeks vs 4-6 weeks vs >6 weeks, p=0.01) were significantly affect overall survival. In multivariate analysis, RTOG RPA classification and involvement of parietal lobes were independent prognostic factors for overall survival. Conclusions: RTOG RPA classification that consisted of age and performance status is an independent prognostic factor for the clinical outcome of GBM. Besides this well-known factor, we also identified the involvement of parietal lobe gives a strong negative influence on survival of GBM patients.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A systematic review of techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite multimodality treatment, the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) has remained poor. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) offers additional local control by directly applying a radiation source to the resection margin, where most recurrences occur.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review on the oncologic outcomes and toxicities of IORT for GBM in the era of modern external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy with temozolamide.

RESULTS

Four studies representing 123 patients were included. Majority (81%) were newly diagnosed, and gross total resection was reported in 13-80% of cases. IORT modalities included electrons from a linear accelerator (LINAC) and photons from a 50-kV x-ray device. Median doses were from 12.5 to 20 Gy for electron-based studies and 10-25 Gy for photon-based studies. Adjuvant treatment consisted of 46-60 Gy post-operative EBRT in electron-based studies and the Stupp protocol in photon-based studies. Complications included radiation necrosis (2.8-33%), infection, hematoma, perilesional edema, and wound dehiscence. Median time to local recurrence was 9.9-16 months and the reported overall progression-free survival was 11.2-12.2 months. Median overall survival was 13-14.2 months for the electron-based studies and 13.8-18 months for the photon-based studies.

CONCLUSION

IORT resulted in improved local control and comparable overall survival rates with the Stupp protocol. Although photon-based IORT had better results than electron IORT, this may be due to improvements in other forms of adjuvant treatment rather than the IORT modality itself. The overall effect of IORT on GBM treatment is still inconclusive due to the small number of patients and heterogeneous reporting of data.

The Role of Delayed Radiotherapy Initiation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma with Residual Tumor Mass

OBJECTIVE

 Treatment for newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximum safe resection, followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy (RCx) with temozolomide. There is evidence that it is safe for GBM patients to prolong time to irradiation over 4 weeks after surgery. This study aimed at evaluating whether this applies to GBM patients with different levels of residual tumor volume (RV).

METHODS

 Medical records of all patients with newly diagnosed GBM at our department between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. Patients who received adjuvant radio (chemo) therapy, aged older than 18 years, and with adequate perioperative imaging were included. Initial and residual tumor volumes were determined. Time to irradiation was dichotomized into two groups (≤28 and >28 days). Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier estimate and log-rank test was performed. Survival prediction and multivariate analysis were performed employing Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

 One hundred and twelve patients were included. Adjuvant treatment regimen, extent of resection, residual tumor volume, and O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation were statistically significant factors for overall survival (OS). Time to irradiation had no impact on progression-free survival (p = 0.946) or OS (p = 0.757). When stratified for different thresholds of residual tumor volume, survival predication via Cox regression favored time to irradiation below 28 days for patients with residual tumor volume above 2 mL, but statistical significance was not reached.

CONCLUSION

 Time to irradiation had no significant influence on OS of the entire cohort. Nevertheless, a statistically nonsignificant survival prolongation could be observed in patients with residual tumor volume > 2 mL when admitted to radiotherapy within 28 days after surgery.

The survival impact of significant delays between surgery and radiochemotherapy in glioblastoma patients: A retrospective analysis from a large tertiary center

The optimal timing of adjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients remains unknown and the paradigm of 'the sooner, the better' has been challenged by many recent publications. In this study, we present unique data on the outcomes of patients with significant treatment delays. The study group consisted of 346 GBM patients (median age 56.8 years) who received surgical treatment (total or subtotal resection) and then underwent adjuvant concurrent RCT at one institution. The main endpoint was overall survival (OS). The Univariate and multivariate Cox Proportional-Hazard Model, log-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method were used for the analysis. The median OS was 18.7 months and the 5-year overall survival was 8.5%. The median time interval from surgery to RCT was 9.8 weeks. The Cox regression showed that the time interval had no statistically significant impact on OS both in uni- and multivariate analysis. The explorative analysis suggested a positive trend for improved survival for patients in the 1st quartile of the time interval, especially for patients with residual disease or local recurrence prior to RCT, However, considering the 6.9 weeks median interval in the 1st quartile, this subgroup should still be regarded as 'moderate delay' compared with other literature data. The results indicate that the time interval is not a clear prognostic factor in the treatment of GBM. Prospective trials are highly warranted, as data suggest that moderate delays in the initiation of adjuvant treatment might be associated with survival benefit.

Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide.

OBJECTIVES

To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.

Durable 5-year local control for resected brain metastases with early adjuvant SRS: the effect of timing on intended-field control

Background

Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) improves the local control of resected brain metastases (BrM). However, the dependency of long-term outcomes on SRS timing relative to surgery remains unclear.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with metastasectomy-plus-adjuvant SRS at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) between 2013 and 2016 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to describe overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence rates were estimated by type of recurrence, accounting for death as a competing event. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and competing risks regression modeling assessed prognostic variables and associated events of interest.

Results

Two hundred and eighty-two patients with BrM had a median OS of 1.5 years (95% CI: 1.2-2.1) from adjuvant SRS with median follow-up of 49.8 months for survivors. Local surgical recurrence, other simultaneously SRS-irradiated site recurrence, and distant central nervous system (CNS) progression rates were 14.3% (95% CI: 10.1-18.5), 4.9% (95% CI: 2.3-7.5), and 47.5% (95% CI: 41.4-53.6) at 5 years, respectively. Median time-to-adjuvant SRS (TT-SRS) was 34 days (IQR: 27-39). TT-SRS was significantly associated with surgical site recurrence rate (P = 0.0008). SRS delivered within 1 month resulted in surgical site recurrence rate of 6.1% (95% CI: 1.3-10.9) at 1-year, compared to 9.2% (95% CI: 4.9-13.6) if delivered between 1 and 2 months, or 27.3% (95% CI: 0.0-55.5) if delivered >2 months after surgery. OS was significantly lower for patients with TT-SRS >~2 months. Postoperative length of stay, discharge to a rehabilitation facility, urgent care visits, and/or disease recurrence between surgery and adjuvant SRS associated with increased TT-SRS.

Conclusions

Adjuvant SRS provides durable local control. However, delays in initiation of postoperative SRS can decrease its efficacy.

Timing of Chemoradiation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Comparative Analysis Between County and Managed Care Health Care Models

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary brain malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of treatment for GBM is surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide. Despite an established treatment protocol, there exists heterogeneity in outcomes due to patients not receiving all treatments. We analyzed patients in different health care models to investigate this heterogeneity.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at 2 hospitals in San Bernardino County, California, for patients with newly diagnosed GBM from 2004 to 2019. Patients younger than 18 years of age, with history of low-grade glioma, who had undergone prior treatment, and those lost to follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 57 patients were included in our study. Chemotherapy was started at 41 ± 30 and 77 ± 68 days in the health maintenance organization (HMO) and county model, respectively (P = 0.050); radiation therapy was started at 46 ± 34 and 85 ± 76 days in the HMO and county models, respectively (P = 0.036). In individuals who underwent both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT), the difference in time to XRT was no longer significant (P = 0.060). Recurrence time was 309 ± 263 and 212 ± 180 days in the HMO and county groups, respectively (P = 0.379). The time to death was 412 ± 285 and 343 ± 304 days for HMO and county models, respectively (P = 0.334).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates a statistically significant difference in time to adjuvant therapies between patients within a county hospital and a managed health care organization. This information has the potential to inform future policies and care coordination for patients within the county model.

Time to treatment initiation and outcomes in high-grade glioma patients in rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study

Aims: To investigate wait time (WT) for chemoradiation and survival in post-op high-grade glioma (HGG) patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation compared with those discharged home. Materials & methods: A total of 291 HGG patients (14.4% grade III and 84.9% grade IV) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were grouped by disposition following surgery. Results: Median length of stay was longer in acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (AIRF) patients (10d) compared with patients discharged home (3d). AIRF admission was associated with higher odds of excessive treatment delay. Median survival for AIRF patients less than for patients discharged home (42.9 vs 72.71 weeks). WT was not associated with survival even after adjusting for prognostic factors. Conclusion: HGG patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities have longer length of stay, longer WT and shorter survival compared with patients discharged home.

Impact of delays in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer on outcome

BACKGROUND

In head and neck cancer (HNC), the relationship between a delay in starting radiotherapy (RT) and the outcome is unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of the amount of time before treatment intervention (TTI) and the growth kinetics of individual tumors on treatment outcomes and survival.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-two HNC patients with 273 primary tumors, treated with definitive (chemo) RT, were retrospectively analyzed. The TTI was defined as the time interval between the date of histopathologic diagnosis and the first day of the RT course. Volumetric data on 57 tumors were obtained from diagnostic and RT planning computer tomography (CT) scans in order to calculate the tumor growth kinetic parameters.

RESULTS

No significant association between locoregional control or cause-specific hazards and TTI was found. The log hazard for locoregional recurrence linearly increased during the first 40 days of waiting for RT, although this was not significant. The median tumor volume relative increase rate and tumor volume doubling time was 3.2%/day and 19 days, respectively, and neither had any impact on locoregional control or cause-specific hazards.

CONCLUSION

The association between a delay in starting RT and the outcome is complex and does not harm all patients waiting for RT. Further research into imaging-derived kinetic data on individual tumors is warranted in order to identify patients at an increased risk of adverse outcomes due to a delay in starting RT.

Survival impact of the time gap between surgery and chemo-radiotherapy in Glioblastoma patients

Glioblastoma treatment protocol includes chemo-radiation (CRT) after maximal safe resection. However, the recommended time-gap between surgery and CRT is unclear, most trials protocol required an interval of less than 6 weeks. In the current study we evaluated the association of the time-gap between surgery and CRT to overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in a tertiary center. After ethics committee approval, a retrospective study was conducted. Data was collected from the medical records of consecutive glioblastoma patients treated between 2005–2014. Parameters of interest included: background characteristics of patients, treatment dates and type of treatment, treatment interruptions and survival. Only patients who were diagnosed with WHO IV, underwent surgical resection (any type), and treated with postoperative CRT were included. For the analysis, patients were divided into 3 groups according to the time gap from surgery to CRT: <4 weeks, 4–6 weeks and >6 weeks. Overall survival and PFS were investigated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Out of 465 patients, 204 were included. Median age was 60 years (range: 23–79 years) and 61.7% male vs. 38.3% female. There was a significant difference in OS (HR = 0.49, p-value = 0.002, 95% CI: 0.32–0.78) and PFS (HR = 0.51, p-value = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.33–0.79) in the group who was treated with CRT 6 weeks or more after surgery, compared with the other two groups tested. In our study, 6 weeks or more time-gap (median of 8 weeks) between surgery and CRT was associated with better OS and PFS among newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Our results are probably subjected to unaccounted biases of a retrospective study, and that CRT in this patient population is an effective therapy that overcomes the potential harm of initiating therapy later than 6 weeks. Our current approach is to initiate CRT within 6 weeks after surgery, similar to what is recommended in the literature, but the data from this study provide us with information that no major harms was done in patients who were delayed.

Optimal timing of chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection of glioblastoma: Stratification by validated prognostic classification

BACKGROUND

Previous studies examining the time to initiate chemoradiation (CRT) after surgical resection of glioblastoma have been conflicting. To better define the effect that the timing of adjuvant treatment may have on outcomes, the authors examined patients within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) stratified by a validated prognostic classification system.

METHODS

Patients with glioblastoma in the NCDB who underwent surgery and CRT from 2004 through 2013 were analyzed. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (III, IV, V) was extrapolated for the cohort. Time intervals were grouped weekly, with weeks 4 to 5 serving as the reference category for analyses. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and multivariate (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 30,414 patients were included. RPA classes III, IV, and V contained 5250, 20,855, and 4309 patients, respectively. On MVA, no time point after week 5 was associated with a change in overall survival for the entire cohort or for any RPA class subgroup. The periods of weeks 0 to 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36), >1 to 2 (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.16-1.31), and >2 to 3 (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15) demonstrated slightly worse overall survival (all P < .03). The detriment to early initiation was consistent across each RPA class subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data provide insight into the optimal timing of CRT in patients with glioblastoma and describe RPA class-specific outcomes. In general, short delays beyond 5 weeks did not negatively affect outcomes, whereas early initiation before 3 weeks may be detrimental.

Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A glioblastoma is a fatal type of brain tumour for which the standard of care is maximum surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy, when possible. Age is an important consideration in this disease, as older age is associated with shorter survival and a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective and best-tolerated approaches for the treatment of elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with these approaches.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase to 3 April 2019, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to database closure. We handsearched clinical trial registries and selected neuro-oncology society conference proceedings from the past five years.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials (RCTs) of treatments for glioblastoma in elderly people. We defined 'elderly' as 70+ years but included studies defining 'elderly' as over 65+ years if so reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods for study selection and data extraction. Where sufficient data were available, treatment options were compared in a network meta-analysis (NMA) using Stata software (version 15.1). For outcomes with insufficient data for NMA, pairwise meta-analysis were conducted in RevMan. The GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 1818 participants. Six were conducted exclusively among elderly people (either defined as 65 years or older or 70 years or older) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the other six reported data for an elderly subgroup among a broader age range of participants. Most participants were capable of self-care. Study quality was commonly undermined by lack of outcome assessor blinding and attrition. NMA was only possible for overall survival; other analyses were pair-wise meta-analyses or narrative syntheses. Seven trials contributed to the NMA for overall survival, with interventions including supportive care only (one trial arm); hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT40; four trial arms); standard radiotherapy (RT60; five trial arms); temozolomide (TMZ; three trial arms); chemoradiotherapy (CRT; three trial arms); bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy (BEV_CRT; one trial arm); and bevacizumab with radiotherapy (BEV_RT). Compared with supportive care only, NMA evidence suggested that all treatments apart from BEV_RT prolonged survival to some extent. Overall survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with RT40 (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.80) and low-certainty evidence suggests that CRT may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ (TMZ versus CRT: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.98). Low-certainty evidence also suggests that adding BEV to CRT may make little or no difference (BEV_CRT versus CRT: HR 0.83, 95% CrI 0.48 to 1.44). We could not compare the survival effects of CRT with different radiotherapy fractionation schedules (60 Gy/30 fractions and 40 Gy/15 fractions) due to a lack of data. When treatments were ranked according to their effects on OS, CRT ranked higher than TMZ, RT and supportive care only, with the latter ranked last. BEV plus RT was the only treatment for which there was no clear benefit in OS over supportive care only.   One trial comparing tumour treating fields (TTF) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (TTF_AC) with adjuvant chemotherapy alone could not be included in the NMA as participants were randomised after receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy, not before. Findings from the trial suggest that the intervention probably improves overall survival in this selected patient population. We were unable to perform NMA for other outcomes due to insufficient data. Pairwise analyses were conducted for the following. Quality of life Moderate-certainty narrative evidence suggests that overall, there may be little difference in QoL between TMZ and RT, except for discomfort from communication deficits, which are probably more common with RT (1 study, 306 participants, P = 0.002). Data on QoL for other comparisons were sparse, partly due to high dropout rates, and the certainty of the evidence tended to be low or very low. Progression-free survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.61); moderate-certainty evidence suggests that RT60 probably increases time to disease progression compared with supportive care only (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.46), and that BEV_RT probably increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 alone (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). Evidence for other treatment comparisons was of low- or very low-certainty. Severe adverse events Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that TMZ probably increases the risk of grade 3+ thromboembolic events compared with RT60 (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.94; participants = 373; studies = 1) and also the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Moderate-certainty evidence also suggests that CRT probably increases the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia compared with hypofractionated RT alone. Adding BEV to CRT probably increases the risk of thromboembolism (RR 16.63, 95% CI 1.00 to 275.42; moderate-certainty evidence). Economic evidence There is a paucity of economic evidence regarding the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Only one economic evaluation on two short course radiotherapy regimen (25 Gy versus 40 Gy) was identified and its findings were considered unreliable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For elderly people with glioblastoma who are self-caring, evidence suggests that CRT prolongs survival compared with RT and may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ alone. For those undergoing RT or TMZ therapy, there is probably little difference in QoL overall. Systemic anti-cancer treatments TMZ and BEV carry a higher risk of severe haematological and thromboembolic events and CRT is probably associated with a higher risk of these events. Current evidence provides little justification for using BEV in elderly patients outside a clinical trial setting. Whilst the novel TTF device appears promising, evidence on QoL and tolerability is needed in an elderly population. QoL and economic assessments of CRT versus TMZ and RT are needed. More high-quality economic evaluations are needed, in which a broader scope of costs (both direct and indirect) and outcomes should be included.

High-grade Glioma - A decade of care in Christchurch

INTRODUCTION

High-grade glioma (HGG) is a devastating illness. Our study aimed to investigate outcomes for patients with HGG treated in Christchurch focussing particularly on those diagnosed with glioblastoma mulitforme (GBM); compare GBM survival with international standards; examine factors associated with better prognosis; and assess the involvement of various allied health disciplines.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective study of patients who were diagnosed and treated for HGG at Christchurch Hospital. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Predefined multivariate analysis was performed to investigate potential prognostic and predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients were diagnosed with HGG at a median age of 64 years with a 5-year overall survival of 6.1%. Patients with grade IV tumours had a poorer outcome than grade III patients (P = 0.0002, log-rank test). Eighty-two per cent of patients had a surgical resection or biopsy of the tumour. For those patients with GBM, gross tumour resection followed by radical chemoradiation was associated with better survival compared with needle biopsy (HR = 1.93, P = 0.018); increasing age was negatively associated with survival (HR = 1.02 per additional age year, P = 0.037); however, waiting time between neurosurgery and radiation did not affect survival. Six per cent of patients received formal psychological input.

CONCLUSION

Our survival outcomes were comparable with internationally published series. More research is required to improve survival in HGG, including molecular guided treatment, and better define treatment paradigms, such as for the elderly and frail.

Super-early initiation of temozolomide prolongs the survival of glioblastoma patients without gross-total resection: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The optimal timing of chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) remains unclear. In this study, we explored the clinical efficacy of super-early initiation of temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment interval from surgery to radiotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 375 patients with GBM in our institution from 2012 to 2018. One hundred and sixty-three patients received super-early TMZ within 7 days after craniotomy based on standard Stupp protocol (super-early group, SEG), while two hundred and twelve patients underwent standard Stupp protocol alone (control group, CG). We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce patient selection bias between the two groups.

RESULTS

Before PSM, both median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in SEG were longer than those in CG (PFS 11.5 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.0384 and OS 23.0 vs. 17.0 months, P = 0.0014). After PSM, the clinical efficacy of super-early initiation of TMZ only remained significant in term of OS, which was further validated in Cox hazard proportional model (HR = 0.583, 95% CI 0.384-0.884, P = 0.011). In the subgroup analysis, patients without gross total resection (GTR) or with O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation could benefit from super-early initiation of TMZ in both PFS and OS (P < 0.05). No significant difference of treatment emerging adverse events was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study highlights that super-early initiation of TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM may confer to survival benefit, especially for those without GTR.

The Impact of Timing of Concurrent Chemoradiation in Patients With High-Grade Glioma in the Era of the Stupp Protocol

Background: The purpose of this study is to provide a critical review of current evidence for the impact of time to initiation of chemoradiation on overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas treated with radiation and concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy.

Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Studies were included if they provided separate analysis for patients treated with current standard of care: radiation and concurrent temozolomide. Bias assessment was performed for each included study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale, with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and extent of resection used for comparability.

Results: The initial search yielded 575 citations. Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 10 retrospective cohort studies were included in this review for a total of 30,298 patients. Of these, one study described an indirect relationship between time to initiation of treatment and overall survival. One study found decreased survival only with patients with significantly longer time to treatment. Four studies found no significant effect of time to treatment on overall survival. The four remaining studies found that patients with moderate time to initiation had the best overall survival.

Conclusion: This review provides evidence that moderate time to initiation of chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-grade gliomas does not lead to a significant decrease in overall survival, though the effect of significant delays in treatment initiation remains unclear.

The impact of the time to start radiation therapy on overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE

The standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes maximal safe surgical resection followed by concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ) and maintenance TMZ. The impact of time to start radiation therapy (TRT) on overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma patients is controversial. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of TRT on OS in patients diagnosed with glioblastoma who received standard treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included patients with confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma treated from 2011 to 2016. TRT was defined as the time between surgery (biopsy or resection) and the first day of radiation therapy. The endpoint was OS. The patients were divided according to the TRT in three categories: < 30 days, 30-60 days and ≥ 60 days.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were included with a mean age of 51.82 years (range 19-78 years). Median TRT was 80 days. On univariate and multivariable analysis, we identified age as the only significant independent predictor for OS. There was no statistically significant negative impact of TRT on OS (p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clear evidence that delaying post-operative combined chemoradiotherapy negatively impacts OS, not even for TRT longer than 60 days.

Overview on current treatment standards in high-grade gliomas

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system, which include anaplastic gliomas (grade III) and glioblastomas (GBM, grade IV). Surgery is the mainstay of treatment in HGGs in order to achieve a histological and molecular characterization, as well as relieve neurological symptoms and improve seizure control. Combinations of some molecular factors, such as IDH 1-2 mutations, 1p/19q codeletion and MGMT methylation status, allow to classify different subtypes of gliomas and identify patients with different outcome. The SOC in HGGs consists in a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with alkylating agents. Despite this therapeutic approach, tumor recurrence occurs in HGGs, and new surgical debulking, reirradiation or second-line chemotherapy are needed. Considering the poor results in terms of survival, several clinical trials have explored the efficacy and tolerability of antiangiogenic agents, targeted therapies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and different immunotherapeutic approaches in recurrent and newly-diagnosed GBM, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and cell- or peptide-based vaccination with unsatisfactory results in term of disease control. In this review we describe the major updates in molecular biology of HGGs according to 2016 WHO Classification, the current management in newly-diagnosed and recurrent GBM and grade III gliomas, and the results of the most relevant clinical trials on targeted agents and immunotherapy.