Diffusion radiomics as a diagnostic model for atypical manifestation of primary central nervous system lymphoma: development and multicenter external validation

Multicenter investigation of preoperative distinction between primary central nervous system lymphomas and glioblastomas through interpretable artificial intelligence models

OBJECTIVE

Research into the effectiveness and applicability of deep learning, radiomics, and their integrated models based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for preoperative differentiation between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) and Glioblastoma (GBM), along with an exploration of the interpretability of these models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on MRI images and clinical data from 261 patients across two medical centers. The data were split into a training set (n = 153, medical center 1) and an external test set (n = 108, medical center 2). Radiomic features were extracted using Pyradiomics to build the Radiomics Model. Deep learning networks, including the transformer-based MobileVIT Model and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) based ConvNeXt Model, were trained separately. By applying the "late fusion" theory, the radiomics model and deep learning model were fused to produce the optimal Max-Fusion Model. Additionally, Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Grad-CAM were employed for interpretability analysis.

RESULTS

In the external test set, the Radiomics Model achieved an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86, the MobileVIT Model had an AUC of 0.91, the ConvNeXt Model demonstrated an AUC of 0.89, and the Max-Fusion Model showed an AUC of 0.92. The Delong test revealed a significant difference in AUC between the Max-Fusion Model and the Radiomics Model (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The Max-Fusion Model, combining different models, presents superior performance in distinguishing PCNSL and GBM, highlighting the effectiveness of model fusion for enhanced decision-making in medical applications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The preoperative non-invasive differentiation between PCNSL and GBM assists clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment regimens and clinical management strategies.

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: A two-center study

PURPOSE

To develop a radiomic nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in rectal cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 318 patients with pathologically proven rectal adenocarcinoma from two hospitals. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging scans of the training cohort, and the radsore model was then constructed. The combined model was obtained by integrating the Radscore and clinical models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic effectiveness of each model, and the best-performing model was used to develop the nomogram.

RESULTS

The Radscore and clinical models exhibited similar diagnostic efficacy (DeLong's test, P > 0.05). The AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of the clinical and Radscore models in the training cohort (AUC: 0.837 vs. 0.763 and 0.787, P: 0.02120 and 0.02309) and the external validation cohort (AUC: 0.880 vs. 0.797 and 0.779, P: 0.02310 and 0.02471). However, the diagnostic performance of the three models was comparable in the internal validation cohort (P > 0.05). Thus, among the three models, the combined model exhibited the highest diagnostic efficiency. The calibration curve exhibited satisfactory consistency between the nomogram predictions and the actual results. DCA confirmed the considerable clinical usefulness of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics nomogram can accurately and noninvasively predict LNM in rectal cancer before surgery, serving as a convenient visualization tool for informing treatment decisions, including the choice of surgical approach and the need for neoadjuvant therapy.

Uses of artificial intelligence in glioma: A systematic review

Glioma is the most prevalent type of primary brain tumor in adults. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in glioma is increasing and has exhibited promising results. The present study performed a systematic review of the applications of AI in glioma as regards diagnosis, grading, prediction of genotype, progression and treatment response using different databases. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the trends (main directions) of the recent applications of AI within the field of glioma, and to highlight emerging challenges in integrating AI within clinical practice. A search in four databases (Scopus, PubMed, Wiley and Google Scholar) yielded a total of 42 articles specifically using AI in glioma and glioblastoma. The articles were retrieved and reviewed, and the data were summarized and analyzed. The majority of the articles were from the USA (n=18) followed by China (n=11). The number of articles increased by year reaching the maximum number in 2022. The majority of the articles studied glioma as opposed to glioblastoma. In terms of grading, the majority of the articles were about both low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) (n=23), followed by HGG/glioblastoma (n=13). Additionally, three articles were about LGG only; two articles did not specify the grade. It was found that one article had the highest sample size among the other studies, reaching 897 samples. Despite the limitations and challenges that face AI, the use of AI in glioma has increased in recent years with promising results, with a variety of applications ranging from diagnosis, grading, prognosis prediction, and reaching to treatment and post-operative care.

Machine learning-based pathomics signature of histology slides as a novel prognostic indicator in primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a pathomics signature for predicting the outcomes of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS

In this study, 132 whole-slide images (WSIs) of 114 patients with PCNSL were enrolled. Quantitative features of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides were extracted using CellProfiler. A pathomics signature was established and validated. Cox regression analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were performed to assess the significance and performance.

RESULTS

In total, 802 features were extracted using a fully automated pipeline. Six machine-learning classifiers demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing malignant neoplasms. The pathomics signature remained a significant factor of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the training cohort (OS: HR 7.423, p < 0.001; PFS: HR 2.143, p = 0.022) and independent validation cohort (OS: HR 4.204, p = 0.017; PFS: HR 3.243, p = 0.005). A significantly lower response rate to initial treatment was found in high Path-score group (19/35, 54.29%) as compared to patients in the low Path-score group (16/70, 22.86%; p < 0.001). The DCA and NRI analyses confirmed that the nomogram showed incremental performance compared with existing models. The ROC curve demonstrated a relatively sensitive and specific profile for the nomogram (1-, 2-, and 3-year AUC = 0.862, 0.932, and 0.927, respectively).

CONCLUSION

As a novel, non-invasive, and convenient approach, the newly developed pathomics signature is a powerful predictor of OS and PFS in PCNSL and might be a potential predictive indicator for therapeutic response.

How does deep learning/machine learning perform in comparison to radiologists in distinguishing glioblastomas (or grade IV astrocytomas) from primary CNS lymphomas?: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been published comparing deep learning (DL)/machine learning (ML) to radiologists in differentiating PCNSLs from GBMs with equivocal results. We aimed to perform this meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ML/DL versus radiologists in classifying PCNSL versus GBM using MRI.

METHODOLOGY

The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted and interpreted by two researchers with 12 and 23 years' experience, respectively, and QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality and risk-bias assessment. We constructed contingency tables to derive sensitivity, specificity accuracy, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Our search identified 11 studies, of which 8 satisfied our inclusion criteria and restricted the analysis in each study to reporting the model showing highest accuracy, with a total sample size of 1159 patients. The random effects model showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.89 [95% CI:0.84-0.92] for ML and 0.82 [95% CI:0.76-0.87] for radiologists. Pooled specificity was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.91] for ML and 0.90 [95% CI: 0.81-0.95] for radiologists. Pooled accuracy was 0.88 [95% CI: 0.86-0.90] for ML and 0.86 [95% CI: 0.78-0.91] for radiologists. Pooled AUC of ML was 0.94 [95% CI:0.92-0.96]and for radiologists, it was 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.93].

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-based ML/DL techniques can complement radiologists to improve the accuracy of classifying GBMs from PCNSL, possibly reduce the need for a biopsy, and avoid any unwanted neurosurgical resection of a PCNSL.

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model for predicting human papillomavirus status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: optimization using oversampling and machine learning techniques

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics model with optimal oversampling and machine learning techniques for predicting human papillomavirus (HPV) status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed and pathologically confirmed OPSCC between January 2017 and December 2020 (110 patients in the training set, 44 patients in the external validation set). A total of 293 radiomics features were extracted from three sequences (T2-weighted images [T2WI], contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images [CE-T1WI], and ADC). Combinations of three feature selection, five oversampling, and 12 machine learning techniques were evaluated to optimize its diagnostic performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the top five models was validated in the external validation set.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (59.2 ± 9.1 years; 132 men [85.7%]) were included, and oversampling was employed to account for data imbalance between HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC (86.4% [133/154] vs. 13.6% [21/154]). For the ADC radiomics model, the combination of random oversampling and ridge showed the highest diagnostic performance in the external validation set (AUC, 0.791; 95% CI, 0.775-0.808). The ADC radiomics model showed a higher trend in diagnostic performance compared to the radiomics model using CE-T1WI (AUC, 0.604; 95% CI, 0.590-0.618), T2WI (AUC, 0.695; 95% CI, 0.673-0.717), and a combination of both (AUC, 0.642; 95% CI, 0.626-0.657).

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC radiomics model using random oversampling and ridge showed the highest diagnostic performance in predicting the HPV status of OPSCC in the external validation set.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Among multiple sequences, the ADC radiomics model has a potential for generalizability and applicability in clinical practice. Exploring multiple oversampling and machine learning techniques was a valuable strategy for optimizing radiomics model performance.

KEY POINTS

• Previous radiomics studies using multiparametric MRI were conducted at single centers without external validation and had unresolved data imbalances. • Among the ADC, CE-T1WI, and T2WI radiomics models and the ADC histogram models, the ADC radiomics model was the best-performing model for predicting human papillomavirus status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. • The ADC radiomics model with the combination of random oversampling and ridge showed the highest diagnostic performance.

Achieving imaging and computational reproducibility on multiparametric MRI radiomics features in brain tumor diagnosis: phantom and clinical validation

OBJECTIVES

The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative has helped improve the computational reproducibility of MRI radiomics features. Nonetheless, the MRI sequences and features with high imaging reproducibility are yet to be established. To determine reproducible multiparametric MRI radiomics features across test-retest, multi-scanner, and computational reproducibility comparisons, and to evaluate their clinical value in brain tumor diagnosis.

METHODS

To assess reproducibility, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were acquired from three 3-T MRI scanners using standardized phantom, and radiomics features were extracted using two computational algorithms. Reproducible radiomics features were selected when the concordance correlation coefficient value above 0.9 across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms. Random forest classifiers were trained with reproducible features (n = 117) and validated in a clinical cohort (n = 50) to evaluate whether features with high reproducibility improved the differentiation of glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs).

RESULTS

Radiomics features from T2WI demonstrated higher repeatability (65-94%) than those from DWI (38-48%) or T1WI (2-92%). Across test-retest, multi-scanner, and computational comparisons, T2WI provided 41 reproducible features, DWI provided six, and T1WI provided two. The performance of the classification model with reproducible features was higher than that using non-reproducible features in both training set (AUC, 0.916 vs. 0.877) and validation set (AUC, 0.957 vs. 0.869).

CONCLUSION

Radiomics features with high reproducibility across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms were identified, and they showed higher diagnostic performance than non-reproducible radiomics features in the differentiation of glioblastoma from PCNSL.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

By identifying the radiomics features showing higher multi-machine reproducibility, our results also demonstrated higher radiomics diagnostic performance in the differentiation of glioblastoma from PCNSL, paving the way for further research designs and clinical application in neuro-oncology.

KEY POINTS

• Highly reproducible radiomics features across multiple sessions, scanners, and computational algorithms were identified using phantom and applied to clinical diagnosis. • Radiomics features from T2-weighted imaging were more reproducible than those from T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging. • Radiomics features with good reproducibility had better diagnostic performance for brain tumors than features with poor reproducibility.

Radiomics for differentiation of gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and objective

Numerous radiomics-based models have been proposed to discriminate between central nervous system (CNS) gliomas and primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). Given the heterogeneity of the existing models, we aimed to define their overall performance and identify the most critical variables to pilot future algorithms.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis were conducted, encompassing 12 studies and a total of 1779 patients, focusing on radiomics to differentiate gliomas from PCNSLs. A comprehensive literature search was performed through PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Overall sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE) were estimated. Event rates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis, and the heterogeneity was assessed using the χ2 test.

Results

The overall SEN and SPE for differentiation between CNS gliomas and PCNSLs were 88% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91) and 87% (95% CI = 0.83 - 0.91), respectively. The best-performing features were the ones extracted from the Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM; ACC 97%), followed by those obtained from the Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM; ACC 93%), and shape-based features (ACC 91%). The 18F-FDG-PET/CT was the best-performing imaging modality (ACC 97%), followed by the MRI CE-T1W (ACC 87% - 95%). Most studies applied a cross-validation analysis (92%).

Conclusion

The current SEN and SPE of radiomics to discriminate CNS gliomas from PCNSLs are high, making radiomics a helpful method to differentiate these tumor types. The best-performing features are the GLRLM, NGTDM, and shape-based features. The 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging modality is the best-performing, while the MRI CE-T1W is the most used.

Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors

This study delineates the pivotal role of imaging within the field of neurology, emphasizing its significance in the diagnosis, prognostication, and evaluation of treatment responses for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. A comprehensive understanding of both the capabilities and limitations inherent in emerging imaging technologies is imperative for delivering a heightened level of personalized care to individuals with neuro-oncological conditions. Ongoing research in neuro-oncological imaging endeavors to rectify some limitations of radiological modalities, aiming to augment accuracy and efficacy in the management of brain tumors. This review is dedicated to the comparison and critical examination of the latest advancements in diverse imaging modalities employed in neuro-oncology. The objective is to investigate their respective impacts on diagnosis, cancer staging, prognosis, and post-treatment monitoring. By providing a comprehensive analysis of these modalities, this review aims to contribute to the collective knowledge in the field, fostering an informed approach to neuro-oncological care. In conclusion, the outlook for neuro-oncological imaging appears promising, and sustained exploration in this domain is anticipated to yield further breakthroughs, ultimately enhancing outcomes for individuals grappling with CNS tumors.

[Predicting cerebral glioma enhancement pattern using a machine learning-based magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model]

OBJECTIVE

To establish a machine learning radiomics model that can accurately predict MRI enhancement patterns of glioma based on T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) images for optimizing the workflow of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of glioma patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected preoperative MR T2-FLAIR images from 385 patients with pathologically confirmed glioma, who were divided into enhancing and non-enhancing groups according to the enhancement pattern. Predictive radiomics models were established using Gaussian Process, Linear Regression, Linear Regression-Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, Support Vector Machine, Linear Discriminant Analysis or Naive Bayes as the classifiers in the training cohort (n=201)and tested both in the internal (n=85) and external validation cohorts (n=99). The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to assess the predictive performance of the models.

RESULTS

The predictive model constructed based on 15 radiomics features using Gaussian Process as the classifier had the best predictive performance in both the training cohort and the internal validation cohort, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.71-0.88), respectively. In the external validation cohort, the model showed an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.90) with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.98, 0.61, 0.76 and 0.96, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The T2-FLAIR-based machine learning radiomics model can accurately predict the enhancement pattern of gliomas on MRI.

Systematic reviews of machine learning in healthcare: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

The increasing availability of data and computing power has made machine learning (ML) a viable approach to faster, more efficient healthcare delivery.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) of published SLRs evaluating ML applications in healthcare settings published between1 January 2010 and 27 March 2023 was conducted.

RESULTS

In total 220 SLRs covering 10,462 ML algorithms were reviewed. The main application of AI in medicine related to the clinical prediction and disease prognosis in oncology and neurology with the use of imaging data. Accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were provided in 56%, 28%, and 25% SLRs respectively. Internal and external validation was reported in 53% and less than 1% of the cases respectively. The most common modeling approach was neural networks (2,454 ML algorithms), followed by support vector machine and random forest/decision trees (1,578 and 1,522 ML algorithms, respectively).

EXPERT OPINION

The review indicated considerable reporting gaps in terms of the ML's performance, both internal and external validation. Greater accessibility to healthcare data for developers can ensure the faster adoption of ML algorithms into clinical practice.

Diagnostic Value of Multiparameter MRI-Based Radiomics in Pediatric Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disorders

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) have a higher prevalence among children. For children undergoing the initial manifestation of MOGAD, prompt diagnosis has paramount importance. This study assessed the performance of multiparameter MRI-based radiomics in distinguishing patients with and without MOGAD with idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled a cohort of 121 patients diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases, including 68 children with MOGAD and 53 children without MOGAD. Radiomics models (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, and compound model) using features extracted from demyelinating lesions within the brain parenchyma were developed in the training set. The performance of these models underwent validation within the internal testing set. Additionally, we gathered clinical factors and MRI features of brain parenchymal lesions at their initial presentation. Subsequently, these variables were used in the construction of a clinical prediction model through multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve for the radiomics models (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, and the compound model) in the training set were 0.781 (95% CI, 0.689-0.864), 0.959 (95% CI, 0.924-0.987), 0.939 (95% CI, 0.898-0.979), and 0.989 (95% CI, 0.976-0.999), respectively. The areas under the curve for the radiomics models (T1WI, T2WI, FLAIR, and the compound model) in the testing set were 0.500 (95% CI, 0.304-0.652), 0.833 (95% CI, 0.697-0.944), 0.804 (95% CI, 0.664-0.918), and 0.905 (95% CI, 0.803-0.979), respectively. The areas under the curve of the clinical prediction model in the training set and testing set were 0.700 and 0.289, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparameter MRI-based radiomics helps distinguish MOGAD from non-MOGAD in patients with idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases.

Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspective

Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare plays a pivotal role in combating many fatal diseases, such as skin, breast, and lung cancer. AI is an advanced form of technology that uses mathematical-based algorithmic principles similar to those of the human mind for cognizing complex challenges of the healthcare unit. Cancer is a lethal disease with many etiologies, including numerous genetic and epigenetic mutations. Cancer being a multifactorial disease is difficult to be diagnosed at an early stage. Therefore, genetic variations and other leading factors could be identified in due time through AI and machine learning (ML). AI is the synergetic approach for mining the drug targets, their mechanism of action, and drug-organism interaction from massive raw data. This synergetic approach is also facing several challenges in data mining but computational algorithms from different scientific communities for multi-target drug discovery are highly helpful to overcome the bottlenecks in AI for drug-target discovery. AI and ML could be the epicenter in the medical world for the diagnosis, treatment, and evaluation of almost any disease in the near future. In this comprehensive review, we explore the immense potential of AI and ML when integrated with the biological sciences, specifically in the context of cancer research. Our goal is to illuminate the many ways in which AI and ML are being applied to the study of cancer, from diagnosis to individualized treatment. We highlight the prospective role of AI in supporting oncologists and other medical professionals in making informed decisions and improving patient outcomes by examining the intersection of AI and cancer control. Although AI-based medical therapies show great potential, many challenges must be overcome before they can be implemented in clinical practice. We critically assess the current hurdles and provide insights into the future directions of AI-driven approaches, aiming to pave the way for enhanced cancer interventions and improved patient care.

A clinical radiomics nomogram preoperatively to predict ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion in women with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

To predict ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISMI) based on clinicopathologic, conventional breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) radiomics signatures in women with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

Eighty-six women with eighty-seven biopsy-proven DCIS who underwent preoperative MRI and underwent surgery were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic, conventional MRI, DCE-MRI radiomics, combine (based on conventional MRI and DCE-MRI radiomics), traditional (based on clinicopathologic and conventional MRI) and mixed (based on clinicopathologic, conventional MRI and DCE-MRI radiomics) models were constructed by logistic regression (LR) with a 3-fold cross-validation, all evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A clinical radiomics nomogram was then built by incorporating the Radiomics score, significant clinicopathologic and conventional MRI features of mixed model.

RESULTS

The area under the curves (AUCs) of clinicopathologic, conventional MRI, DCE-MRI radiomics, traditional, combine, and mixed model were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.94), 0.77 (95%CI 0.59-0.95), 0.74 (95%CI 0.55-0.93), 0.87 (95%CI 0.73-1), 0.8 (95%CI 0.63-0.96), and 0.93 (95%CI 0.84-1) in the validation cohort, respectively. The clinical radiomics nomogram based on mixed model showed higher AUCs than both clinicopathologic and DCE-MRI radiomics models in training/test (all P < 0.05) set and showed the greatest overall net benefit for upstaging according to decision curve analysis (DCA).

CONCLUSION

A nomogram constructed by combining clinicopathologic, conventional MRI features and DCE-MRI radiomics signatures may be useful in predicting DCISMI from DICS preoperatively.

Opportunities and Challenges of Synthetic Data Generation in Oncology

Widespread interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has focused mainly on deductive systems that analyze available real-world data to discover patterns not otherwise visible. Generative adversarial network, a new type of inductive AI, has recently evolved to generate high-fidelity virtual synthetic data (SD) trained on relatively limited real-world information. The AI system is fed with a collection of real data, and it learns to generate new augmented data while maintaining the general characteristics of the original data set. The use of SD to enhance clinical research and protect patient privacy has drawn a lot of interest in medicine and in the complex field of oncology. This article summarizes the main characteristics of this innovative technology and critically discusses how it can be used to accelerate data access for secondary purposes, providing an overview of the opportunities and challenges of SD generation for clinical cancer research and health care.

Atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma: multiparametric differentiation based on non-enhancing volume, apparent diffusion coefficient, and arterial spin labeling

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the multiparametric diagnostic performance with non-enhancing tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) to differentiate between atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-eight patients with pathologically confirmed typical PCNSL (n = 59), atypical PCNSL (hemorrhage, necrosis, or heterogeneous contrast enhancement, n = 29), and GBM (n = 70) were selected. Relative minimum ADC (rADCmin), mean (rADCmean), maximum (rADCmax), and rADCmax-min (rADCdif) were obtained by standardization of the contralateral white matter. Maximum cerebral blood flow (CBFmax) was obtained according to the ASL-CBF map. The regions of interests (ROIs) were manually delineated on the inner side of the tumor to further generate a 3D-ROI and obtain the non-enhancing tumor (nET) volume. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Atypical PCNSLs showed significantly lower rADCmax, rADCmean, and rADCdif than that of GBMs. GBMs showed significantly higher CBFmax and nET volume ratios than that of atypical PCNSLs. Combined three-variable models with rADCmean, CBFmax, and nET volume ratio were superior to one- and two-variable models. The AUC of the three-variable model was 0.96, and the sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 96.55%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combined evaluation of rADCmean, CBFmax, and nET volume allowed for reliable differentiation between atypical PCNSL and GBM.

KEY POINTS

• Atypical PCNSL is easily misdiagnosed as glioblastoma, which leads to unnecessary surgical resection. • The nET volume, ADC, and ASL-derived parameter (CBF) were lower for atypical PCNSL than that for glioblastoma. • The combination of multiple parameters performed well (AUC = 0.96) in the discrimination between atypical PCNSL and glioblastoma.

Differentiating glioblastoma from primary central nervous system lymphoma of atypical manifestation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: A comparative study

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of single parameters, unimodality, and bimodality in distinguishing glioblastoma (GBM) from atypical primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) enhancement, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) findings.

Methods

The cohort included 108 patients pathologically diagnosed with GBM and 54 patients pathologically diagnosed with PCNSL. Pretreatment morphological MRI, DWI, DSC, DTI and MRS were all performed on each patient. The quantitative parameters of multimodal MRI were measured and compared between the patients in the GBM and atypical PCNSL groups, and those parameters showing a significant difference (p < 0.05) between patients in the GBM and atypical PCNSL groups were used to develop one-parameters, unimodality, and bimodality models. We evaluated the efficiency of different models in distinguishing GBM from atypical PCNSL by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC).

Results

Atypical PCNSL had lower minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_min), mean ADC (ADC_mean), relative ADC (rADC), mean relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV_mean), maximum rCBV (rCBV_max), fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusion coefficient (DA) and radial diffusion coefficient (DR) values and higher choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and lipid/creatine (Lip/Cr) ratios than GBM (all p < 0.05). The rCBV_max, DTI and DSC + DTI data were optimal models of single-parameter, unimodality and bimodality for differentiation of GBM from atypical PCNSL, yielding areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.905, 0.954, and 0.992, respectively.

Conclusions

Models of single-parameter, unimodality and bimodality based on muti multiparameter functional MRI may help to discriminate GBM from atypical PCNSL.

Improving the Classification of PCNSL and Brain Metastases by Developing a Machine Learning Model Based on 18F-FDG PET

Background: The characteristic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the positron emission tomography (PET) findings of PCNSL often overlap with other intracranial tumors, making definitive diagnosis challenging. PCNSL typically shows iso-hypointense to grey matter on T2-weighted imaging. However, a particular part of PCNSL can demonstrate T2-weighted hyperintensity as other intracranial tumors. Moreover, normal high uptake of FDG in the basal ganglia, thalamus, and grey matter can mask underlying PCNSL in 18F-FDG PET. In order to promote the efficiency of diagnosis, the MRI-based or PET/CT-based radiomics models combining histograms with texture features in diagnosing glioma and brain metastases have been widely established. However, the diagnosing model for PCNSL has not been widely reported. The study was designed to investigate a machine-learning (ML) model based on multiple parameters of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-floor-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET for differential diagnosis of PCNSL and metastases in the brain. Methods: Patients who underwent an 18F-FDG PET scan with untreated PCNSL or metastases in the brain were included between May 2016 and May 2022. A total of 126 lesions from 51 patients (43 patients with untreated brain metastases and eight patients with untreated PCNSL), including 14 lesions of PCNSL, and 112 metastatic lesions in the brain, met the inclusion criteria. PCNSL or brain metastasis was confirmed after pathology or clinical history. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to decompose the datasets. Logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest classification (RFC) models were trained by two different groups of datasets, the group of multi-class features and the group of density features, respectively. The model with the highest mean precision score was selected. The testing sets and original data were used to examine the efficacy of models separately by using the weighted average F1 score and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results: The multi-class features-based RFC and SVM models reached identical weighted-average F1 scores in the testing set, and the score was 0.98. The AUCs of RFC and SVM models calculated from the testing set were 1.00 equally. Evaluated by the original dataset, the RFC model based on multi-class features performs better than the SVM model, whose weighted-average F1 scores of the RFC model calculated from the original data were 0.85 with an AUC of 0.93. Conclusions: The ML based on multi-class features of 18F-FDG PET exhibited the potential to distinguish PCNSL from brain metastases. The RFC models based on multi-class features provided comparatively high efficiency in our study.

Combination of Hematoma Volume and Perihematoma Radiomics Analysis on Baseline CT Scan Predicts the Growth of Perihematomal Edema

PURPOSE

The aim is to explore the potential value of CT-based radiomics in predicting perihematomal edema (PHE) volumes after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from admission to 24 h.

METHODS

A total of 231 patients newly diagnosed with acute ICH at two institutes were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were randomly divided into training (N = 117) and internal validation cohort (N = 45) from institute 1 with a ratio of 7:3. According to radiomics features extracted from baseline CT, the radiomics signatures were constructed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used for clinical radiological factors and then the nomogram model was generated to predict the extent of PHE according to the optimal radiomics signature and the clinical radiological factors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the discrimination performance. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the consistency between the predicted and actual probability. The support vector regression (SVR) model was constructed to predict the overall value of follow-up PHE. The performance of the models was evaluated on the internal and independent validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The perihematoma 5 mm radiomics signature (AUC: 0.875) showed good ability to discriminate the small relative PHE(rPHE) from large rPHE volumes, comparing to intrahematoma radiomics signature (AUC: 0.711) or perihematoma 10 mm radiomics signature (AUC: 0.692) on the training cohort. The AUC of the combined nomogram model was 0.922 for the training cohort, 0.945 and 0.902 for the internal and independent validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow test of the nomogram model suggested that the predictive performance and actual outcome were in favorable agreement. The SVR model also predicted the overall value of follow-up rPHE (root mean squared error, 0.60 and 0.45; Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.73 and 0.68; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with acute ICH, the established nomogram and SVR model with favorable performance can offer a noninvasive tool for the prediction of PHE after ICH.

Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Rare Cancer: A Case Study for Primary CNS Lymphoma Patients

Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive neoplasm with a poor prognosis. Although therapeutic progresses have significantly improved Overall Survival (OS), a number of patients do not respond to HD–MTX-based chemotherapy (15–25%) or experience relapse (25–50%) after an initial response. The reasons underlying this poor response to therapy are unknown. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop improved predictive models for PCNSL. In this study, we investigated whether radiomics features can improve outcome prediction in patients with PCNSL. A total of 80 patients diagnosed with PCNSL were enrolled. A patient sub-group, with complete Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) series, were selected for the stratification analysis. Following radiomics feature extraction and selection, different Machine Learning (ML) models were tested for OS and Progression-free Survival (PFS) prediction. To assess the stability of the selected features, images from 23 patients scanned at three different time points were used to compute the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and to evaluate the reproducibility of each feature for both original and normalized images. Features extracted from Z-score normalized images were significantly more stable than those extracted from non-normalized images with an improvement of about 38% on average (p-value < 10−12). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) showed that radiomics-based prediction overcame prediction based on current clinical prognostic factors with an improvement of 23% for OS and 50% for PFS, respectively. These results indicate that radiomics features extracted from normalized MR images can improve prognosis stratification of PCNSL patients and pave the way for further study on its potential role to drive treatment choice.

Data synthesis and adversarial networks: A review and meta-analysis in cancer imaging

Despite technological and medical advances, the detection, interpretation, and treatment of cancer based on imaging data continue to pose significant challenges. These include inter-observer variability, class imbalance, dataset shifts, inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity, malignancy determination, and treatment effect uncertainty. Given the recent advancements in image synthesis, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and adversarial training, we assess the potential of these technologies to address a number of key challenges of cancer imaging. We categorise these challenges into (a) data scarcity and imbalance, (b) data access and privacy, (c) data annotation and segmentation, (d) cancer detection and diagnosis, and (e) tumour profiling, treatment planning and monitoring. Based on our analysis of 164 publications that apply adversarial training techniques in the context of cancer imaging, we highlight multiple underexplored solutions with research potential. We further contribute the Synthesis Study Trustworthiness Test (SynTRUST), a meta-analysis framework for assessing the validation rigour of medical image synthesis studies. SynTRUST is based on 26 concrete measures of thoroughness, reproducibility, usefulness, scalability, and tenability. Based on SynTRUST, we analyse 16 of the most promising cancer imaging challenge solutions and observe a high validation rigour in general, but also several desirable improvements. With this work, we strive to bridge the gap between the needs of the clinical cancer imaging community and the current and prospective research on data synthesis and adversarial networks in the artificial intelligence community.

Radiomic-Based MRI for Classification of Solitary Brain Metastases Subtypes From Primary Lymphoma of the Central Nervous System

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis of brain metastases subtype and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is necessary for treatment decisions. The application of machine learning facilitates the classification of brain tumors, but prior investigations into primary lymphoma and brain metastases subtype classification have been limited.

PURPOSE

To develop a machine-learning model to classify PCNSL, brain metastases with primary lung and non-lung origin.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

A total of 211 subjects with pathologically confirmed PCNSL or brain metastases (training cohort 168 and testing cohort 43).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo inversion recovery sequence (T1WI-CE), axial T2-weighted fluid-attenuation inversion recovery sequence (T2FLAIR) ASSESSMENT: Several machine-learning models (support vector machine, random forest, and K-nearest neighbors) were built with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) using features from T1WI-CE, T2FLAIR, and clinical. The model with the highest performance in the training cohort was selected to differentiate lesions in the testing cohort. Then, three radiologists conducted a two-round classification (with and without model reference) using images and clinical information from testing cohorts.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Five-fold cross-validation was used for model evaluation and calibration. Model performance was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Twenty-five image features were selected by LASSO analysis. Random forest classifier was selected for its highest performance on the training set with an AUC of 0.73. After calibration, this model achieved an accuracy of 0.70 on the testing set. Accuracies of all three radiologists improved under model reference (0.49 vs. 0.70, 0.60 vs. 0.77, 0.58 vs. 0.72, respectively).

DATA CONCLUSION

The random forest model based on conventional MRI and clinical data can diagnose PCNSL and brain metastases subtypes (lung and non-lung origin). Model classification can help foster the diagnostic accuracy of specialists and streamline prognostication workflow.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Nomogram based on MRI for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in patients with intrahepatic mass cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To validate a new nomogram based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pre-operative prediction of Ki-67 expression in patients with intrahepatic mass cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC).

METHODS

A total of 78 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed IMCC who underwent pre-operative gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced MRI between 2016 and 2022 were enrolled in the training and validation group (53 patients and 25 patients, respectively). Images including qualitative, quantitative MRI features and clinical data were evaluated. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to select the independent predictors and establish different predictive models. The predictive performance was validated by operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The validation cohort was used to test the predictive performance of the optimal model. The nomogram was constructed with the optimal model.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, independent predictors obtained from the combined model were DWI (OR 1822.741; 95% CI 6.189, 536,781.805; P = 0.01) and HBP enhancement pattern (OR 14.270; 95% CI 1.044, 195.039; P = 0.046). The combined model showed the good performance (AUC 0.981; 95% CI 0.952, 1.000) for predicting Ki-67 expression. In the validation cohort, The combined model (AUC 0.909; 95% CI 0.787, 1.000)showed the best performance compared to the clinical model (AUC 0.448; 95% CI 0.196, 0.700) and MRI model (AUC 0.770; 95% CI 0.570, 0.970).

CONCLUSION

This new nomogram has a good performance in predicting Ki-67 expression in patients with IMCC, which could help the decision-making of the patients' therapy strategies.

Machine learning–based multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging radiomics model for distinguishing central neurocytoma from glioma of lateral ventricle

OBJECTIVES

To develop a machine learning-based radiomics model based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for preoperative discrimination between central neurocytomas (CNs) and gliomas of lateral ventricles.

METHODS

A total of 132 patients from two medical centers were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients from the first medical center were divided into a training cohort (n = 74) and an internal validation cohort (n = 30). Patients from the second medical center were used as the external validation cohort (n = 28). Features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted images. A support vector machine was used for radiomics model investigation. Performance was evaluated using the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model's performance was also compared with those of three radiologists.

RESULTS

The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.986 in the training cohort, 0.933 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.903 in the external validation cohort. In the three cohorts, the AUC values were 0.657, 0.786, and 0.708 for radiologist 1; 0.838, 0.799, and 0.790 for radiologist 2; and 0.827, 0.871, and 0.862 for radiologist 3. When assisted by the radiomics model, two radiologists improved their performance in the training cohort (p < 0.05) but not in the internal or external validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The machine learning radiomics model based on multiparametric MRI showed better performance for distinguishing CNs from lateral ventricular gliomas than did experienced radiologists, and it showed the potential to improve radiologist performance.

KEY POINTS

• The machine learning radiomics model shows excellent performance in distinguishing CNs from gliomas. • The radiomics model outweighs two experienced radiologists (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90 vs 0.79 and 0.86, respectively). • The radiomics model has the potential to enhance radiologist performance.

The application of machine learning to imaging in hematological oncology: A scoping review

Background

Here, we conducted a scoping review to (i) establish which machine learning (ML) methods have been applied to hematological malignancy imaging; (ii) establish how ML is being applied to hematological cancer radiology; and (iii) identify addressable research gaps.

Methods

The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The inclusion criteria were (i) pediatric and adult patients with suspected or confirmed hematological malignancy undergoing imaging (population); (ii) any study using ML techniques to derive models using radiological images to apply to the clinical management of these patients (concept); and (iii) original research articles conducted in any setting globally (context). Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 criteria were used to assess diagnostic and segmentation studies, while the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of observational studies.

Results

Of 53 eligible studies, 33 applied diverse ML techniques to diagnose hematological malignancies or to differentiate them from other diseases, especially discriminating gliomas from primary central nervous system lymphomas (n=18); 11 applied ML to segmentation tasks, while 9 applied ML to prognostication or predicting therapeutic responses, especially for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All studies reported discrimination statistics, but no study calculated calibration statistics. Every diagnostic/segmentation study had a high risk of bias due to their case-control design; many studies failed to provide adequate details of the reference standard; and only a few studies used independent validation.

Conclusion

To deliver validated ML-based models to radiologists managing hematological malignancies, future studies should (i) adhere to standardized, high-quality reporting guidelines such as the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging; (ii) validate models in independent cohorts; (ii) standardize volume segmentation methods for segmentation tasks; (iv) establish comprehensive prospective studies that include different tumor grades, comparisons with radiologists, optimal imaging modalities, sequences, and planes; (v) include side-by-side comparisons of different methods; and (vi) include low- and middle-income countries in multicentric studies to enhance generalizability and reduce inequity.

Progress of radiological‑pathological workflows in the differential diagnosis between primary central nervous system lymphoma and high‑grade glioma (Review)

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and high‑grade glioma (HGG) are distinct entities of the CNS with completely distinct treatments. The treatment of PCNSL is chemotherapy‑based, while surgery is the first choice for HGG. However, the clinical features of the two entities often overlap, and a clear pathological diagnosis is important for subsequent management, especially for the management of PCNSL. Stereotactic biopsy is recognized as one of the minimally invasive alternatives for evaluating the involvement of the CNS. However, in the case of limited tissue materials, the differential diagnosis between the two entities is still difficult. In addition, some patients are too ill to tolerate a needle biopsy. Therefore, combining imaging, histopathology and laboratory examinations is essential in order to make a clear diagnosis as soon as possible. The present study reviews the progress of comparative research on both imaging and laboratory tests based on the pathophysiological changes of the two entities, and proposes an integrative and optimized diagnostic process, with the purpose of building a better understanding for neurologists, hematologists, radiologists and pathologists.

Fully automated radiomics-based machine learning models for multiclass classification of single brain tumors: Glioblastoma, lymphoma, and metastasis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of fully automated radiomics-based models for multiclass classification of a single enhancing brain tumor among glioblastoma, central nervous system lymphoma, and metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The training and test sets were comprised of 538 cases (300 glioblastomas, 73 lymphomas, and 165 metastases) and 169 cases (101 glioblastomas, 29 lymphomas, and 39 metastases), respectively. After fully automated segmentation, radiomic features were extracted. Three conventional machine learning classifiers, including least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), adaptive boosting (Adaboost), and support vector machine with the linear kernel (SVC), combined with one of four feature selection methods, including forward sequential feature selection, F score, mutual information, and LASSO, were trained. Additionally, one ensemble classifier based on the three classifiers was used. The diagnostic performance of the optimized models was tested in the test set using the accuracy, F1-macro score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC).

RESULTS

The best performance was achieved when the LASSO was used as a feature selection method. In the test set, the best performance was achieved by the ensemble classifier, showing an accuracy of 76.3% (95% CI, 70.0-82.7), a F1-macro score of 0.704, and an AUCROC of 0.878.

CONCLUSION

Our fully automated radiomics-based models for multiclass classification might be useful for differential diagnosis of a single enhancing brain tumor with a good diagnostic performance and generalizability.

Development and Validation of a Model Using Radiomics Features from an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map to Diagnose Local Tumor Recurrence in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model using radiomics features from apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map to diagnose local tumor recurrence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 285 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 62 ± 12 years; 220 male, 77.2%), including 215 for training (n = 161) and internal validation (n = 54) and 70 others for external validation, with newly developed contrast-enhancing lesions at the primary cancer site on the surveillance MRI following definitive treatment of HNSCC between January 2014 and October 2019. Of the 215 and 70 patients, 127 and 34, respectively, had local tumor recurrence. Radiomics models using radiomics scores were created separately for T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI), and ADC maps using non-zero coefficients from the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator in the training set. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of each radiomics score and known clinical parameter (age, sex, and clinical stage) in the internal and external validation sets.

RESULTS

Five radiomics features from T2WI, six from CE-T1WI, and nine from ADC maps were selected and used to develop the respective radiomics models. The area under ROC curve (AUROC) of ADC radiomics score was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.89) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65-0.88) in the internal and external validation sets, respectively. These were significantly higher than the AUROC values of T2WI (0.53 [95% CI, 0.40-0.67], p = 0.006), CE-T1WI (0.53 [95% CI, 0.40-0.67], p = 0.012), and clinical parameters (0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.67], p = 0.021) in the external validation set.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model using ADC maps exhibited higher diagnostic performance than those of the radiomics models using T2WI or CE-T1WI and clinical parameters in the diagnosis of local tumor recurrence in HNSCC following definitive treatment.

Classifying primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma using deep learning and radiomics based machine learning approach - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are common in elderly yet difficult to differentiate on MRI. Their management and prognosis are quite different. Recent surge of interest in predictive analytics, using machine learning (ML) from radiomic features and deep learning (DL) for diagnosing, predicting response and prognosticating disease has evinced interest among radiologists and clinicians. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the deep learning &amp; ML algorithms in classifying PCNSL from GBM.

Methods

The authors performed a systematic review of the literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central trials register for the search strategy in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to select and evaluate studies that included themes of ML, DL, AI, GBM, PCNSL. All studies reporting on ML algorithms or DL that for differentiating PCNSL from GBM on MR imaging were included. These studies were further narrowed down to focus on works published between 2018 and 2021. Two researchers independently conducted the literature screening, database extraction and risk bias assessment. The extracted data was synthesised and analysed by forest plots. Outcomes assessed were test characteristics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and balanced accuracy.

Results

Ten articles meeting the eligibility criteria were identified addressing use of ML and DL in training and validation classifiers to distinguish PCNSL from GBM on MR imaging. The total sample size was 1311 in the included studies. ML approach was used in 6 studies while DL in 4 studies. The lowest reported sensitivity was 80%, while the highest reported sensitivity was 99% in studies in which ML and DL was directly compared with the gold standard histopathology. The lowest reported specificity was 87% while the highest reported specificity was 100%. The highest reported balanced accuracy was 100% and the lowest was 84%.

Conclusions

Extensive search of the database revealed a limited number of studies that have applied ML or DL to differentiate PCNSL from GBM. Of the currently published studies, Both DL &amp; ML algorithms have demonstrated encouraging results and certainly have the potential to aid neurooncologists in taking preoperative decisions in the future leading to not only reduction in morbidities but also be cost effective.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning CT-Based Models for Predicting the Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioma Types: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Purpose and Background

Distinguishing primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioma on computed tomography (CT) is an important task since treatment options differ vastly from the two diseases. This study aims to explore various machine learning and deep learning methods based on radiomic features extracted from CT scans and end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict PCNSL and glioma types and compare the performance of different models.

Methods

A total of 101 patients from five Chinese medical centers with pathologically confirmed PCNSL and glioma were analyzed retrospectively, including 50 PCNSL and 51 glioma. After manual segmentation of the region of interest (ROI) on CT scans, 293 radiomic features of each patient were extracted. The radiomic features were used as input, and then, we established six machine learning models and one deep learning model and three readers to identify the two types of tumors. We also established a 2D CNN model using raw CT scans as input. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy (ACC) were used to evaluate different models.

Results

The cohort was split into a training (70, 70% patients) and validation cohort (31,30% patients) according to the stratified sampling strategy. Among all models, the MLP performed best, with an accuracy of 0.886 and 0.903, sensitivity of 0.914 and 0.867, specificity of 0.857 and 0.937, and AUC of 0.957 and 0.908 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, which was significantly higher than the three primary physician's diagnoses (ACCs ranged from 0.710 to 0.742, p &lt; 0.001 for all) and comparable with the senior radiologist (ACC 0.839, p = 0.988). Among all the machine learning models, the AUC ranged from 0.605 to 0.821 in the validation cohort. The end-to-end CNN model achieved an AUC of 0.839 and an ACC of 0.840 in the validation cohort, which had no significant difference in accuracy compared to the MLP model (p = 0.472) and the senior radiologist (p = 0.470).

Conclusion

The established PCNSL and glioma prediction model based on deep neural network methods from CT scans or radiomic features are feasible and provided high performance, which shows the potential to assist clinical decision-making.

Artificial intelligence in the radiomic analysis of glioblastomas: A review, taxonomy, and perspective

Radiological imaging techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), are the standard-of-care non-invasive diagnostic approaches widely applied in neuro-oncology. Unfortunately, accurate interpretation of radiological imaging data is constantly challenged by the indistinguishable radiological image features shared by different pathological changes associated with tumor progression and/or various therapeutic interventions. In recent years, machine learning (ML)-based artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been widely applied in medical image processing and bioinformatics due to its advantages in implicit image feature extraction and integrative data analysis. Despite its recent rapid development, ML technology still faces many hurdles for its broader applications in neuro-oncological radiomic analysis, such as lack of large accessible standardized real patient radiomic brain tumor data of all kinds and reliable predictions on tumor response upon various treatments. Therefore, understanding ML-based AI technologies is critically important to help us address the skyrocketing demands of neuro-oncology clinical deployments. Here, we provide an overview on the latest advancements in ML techniques for brain tumor radiomic analysis, emphasizing proprietary and public dataset preparation and state-of-the-art ML models for brain tumor diagnosis, classifications (e.g., primary and secondary tumors), discriminations between treatment effects (pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis) and true progression, survival prediction, inflammation, and identification of brain tumor biomarkers. We also compare the key features of ML models in the realm of neuroradiology with ML models employed in other medical imaging fields and discuss open research challenges and directions for future work in this nascent precision medicine area.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis and Classification Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

IMPORTANCE

Deep learning may be able to use patient magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to aid in brain tumor classification and diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and clinically validate a deep learning system for automated identification and classification of 18 types of brain tumors from patient MRI data.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This diagnostic study was conducted using MRI data collected between 2000 and 2019 from 37 871 patients. A deep learning system for segmentation and classification of 18 types of intracranial tumors based on T1- and T2-weighted images and T2 contrast MRI sequences was developed and tested. The diagnostic accuracy of the system was tested using 1 internal and 3 external independent data sets. The clinical value of the system was assessed by comparing the tumor diagnostic accuracy of neuroradiologists with vs without assistance of the proposed system using a separate internal test data set. Data were analyzed from March 2019 through February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in neuroradiologist clinical diagnostic accuracy in brain MRI scans with vs without the deep learning system were evaluated.

RESULTS

A deep learning system was trained among 37 871 patients (mean [SD] age, 41.6 [11.4] years; 18 519 women [48.9%]). It achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-0.99) on 1339 patients from 4 centers' data sets in diagnosis and classification of 18 types of tumors. Higher outcomes were found compared with neuroradiologists for accuracy and sensitivity and similar outcomes for specificity (for 300 patients in the Tiantan Hospital test data set: accuracy, 73.3% [95% CI, 67.7%-77.7%] vs 60.9% [95% CI, 46.8%-75.1%]; sensitivity, 88.9% [95% CI, 85.3%-92.4%] vs 53.4% [95% CI, 41.8%-64.9%]; and specificity, 96.3% [95% CI, 94.2%-98.4%] vs 97.9%; [95% CI, 97.3%-98.5%]). With the assistance of the deep learning system, the mean accuracy of neuroradiologists among 1166 patients increased by 12.0 percentage points, from 63.5% (95% CI, 60.7%-66.2%) without assistance to 75.5% (95% CI, 73.0%-77.9%) with assistance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that deep learning system-based automated diagnosis may be associated with improved classification and diagnosis of intracranial tumors from MRI data among neuroradiologists.

Inherited genetics of adult diffuse glioma and polygenic risk scores-a review

Knowledge about inherited and acquired genetics of adult diffuse glioma has expanded significantly over the past decade. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) stratified by histologic subtype identified six germline variants that were associated specifically with glioblastoma (GBM) and 12 that were associated with lower grade glioma. A GWAS performed using the 2016 WHO criteria, stratifying patients by IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion (as well as TERT promoter mutation), discovered that many of the known variants are associated with specific WHO glioma subtypes. In addition, the GWAS stratified by molecular group identified two additional novel regions: variants in D2HGDH that were associated with tumors that had an IDH mutation and a variant near FAM20C that was associated with tumors that had both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. The results of these germline associations have been used to calculate polygenic risk scores, from which to estimate relative and absolute risk of overall glioma and risk of specific glioma subtypes. We will review the concept of polygenic risk models and their potential clinical utility, as well as discuss the published adult diffuse glioma polygenic risk models. To date, these prior genetic studies have been done on European populations. Using the published glioma polygenic risk model, we show that the genetic associations published to date do not generalize across genetic ancestries, demonstrating that genetic studies need to be done on more diverse populations.

Radiomics Features on Computed Tomography Combined With Clinical-Radiological Factors Predicting Progressive Hemorrhage of Cerebral Contusion

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the main cause of death and severe disability in young adults worldwide. Progressive hemorrhage (PH) worsens the disease and can cause a poor neurological prognosis. Radiomics analysis has been used for hematoma expansion of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. This study attempts to develop an optimal radiomics model based on non-contrast CT to predict PH by machine learning (ML) methods and compare its prediction performance with clinical-radiological models.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 165 TBI patients, including 89 patients with PH and 76 patients without PH, whose data were randomized into a training set and a testing set at a ratio of 7:3. A total of 10 different machine learning methods were used to predict PH. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were implemented to screen clinical-radiological factors and to establish a clinical-radiological model. Then, a combined model combining clinical-radiological factors with the radiomics score was constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F1 score, sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the models.

Results

Among the 10 various ML algorithms, the support vector machine (SVM) had the best prediction performance based on 12 radiomics features, including the AUC (training set: 0.918; testing set: 0.879) and accuracy (training set: 0.872; test set: 0.834). Among the clinical and radiological factors, the onset-to-baseline CT time, the scalp hematoma, and fibrinogen were associated with PH. The radiomics model's prediction performance was better than the clinical-radiological model, while the predictive nomogram combining the radiomics features with clinical-radiological characteristics performed best.

Conclusions

The radiomics model outperformed the traditional clinical-radiological model in predicting PH. The nomogram model of the combined radiomics features and clinical-radiological factors is a helpful tool for PH.

Ultrasound-Based Radiomics Can Classify the Etiology of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

Medical diagnostic imaging is essential for the differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy. Here we develop an ultrasound radiomics method for accurately differentiating cervical lymph node tuberculosis (LNTB), cervical lymphoma, reactive lymph node hyperplasia, and metastatic lymph nodes especially in the multi-operator, cross-machine, multicenter context. The inter-observer and intra-observer consistency of radiomics parameters from the region of interest were 0.8245 and 0.9228, respectively. The radiomics model showed good and repeatable diagnostic performance for multiple classification diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy, especially in LNTB (area under the curve, AUC: 0.673, 0.662, and 0.626) and cervical lymphoma (AUC: 0.623, 0.644, and 0.602) in the whole set, training set, and test set, respectively. However, the diagnostic performance of lymphadenopathy among skilled radiologists was varied (Kappa coefficient: 0.108, *p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of radiomics is comparable and more reproducible compared with those of skilled radiologists. Our study offers a more comprehensive method for differentiating LNTB, cervical lymphoma, reactive lymph node hyperplasia, and metastatic LN.

A Systematic Review of the Current Status and Quality of Radiomics for Glioma Differential Diagnosis

Simple Summary

Gliomas can be difficult to discern clinically and radiologically from other brain lesions (either neoplastic or non-neoplastic) since their clinical manifestations as well as preoperative imaging features often overlap and appear misleading. Radiomics could be extremely helpful for non-invasive glioma differential diagnosis (DDx). However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. In this context, we aimed to summarize the current status and quality of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx in a systematic review. In total, 42 studies were selected and examined in our work. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Abstract

Radiomics is a promising tool that may increase the value of imaging in differential diagnosis (DDx) of glioma. However, implementation in clinical practice is still distant and concerns have been raised regarding the methodological quality of radiomic studies. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current status of radiomic studies concerning glioma DDx, also using the radiomics quality score (RQS) to assess the quality of the methodology used in each study. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles focused on the use of radiomics for glioma DDx from 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the RQS tool. Spearman’s correlation (ρ) analysis was performed to explore whether RQS was correlated with journal metrics and the characteristics of the studies. Finally, 42 articles were selected for the systematic qualitative analysis. Selected articles were grouped and summarized in terms of those on DDx between glioma and primary central nervous system lymphoma, those aiming at differentiating glioma from brain metastases, and those based on DDx of glioma and other brain diseases. Median RQS was 8.71 out 36, with a mean RQS of all studies of 24.21%. Our study revealed that, despite promising and encouraging results, current studies on radiomics for glioma DDx still lack the quality required to allow its introduction into clinical practice. This work could provide new insights and help to reach a consensus on the use of the radiomic approach for glioma DDx.

Deep Neural Networks and Machine Learning Radiomics Modelling for Prediction of Relapse in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive lymphoid tumour with a poor prognosis. There exist no routine biomarkers for the early prediction of relapse. Our study compared the potential of radiomics-based machine learning and 3D deep learning models as non-invasive biomarkers to risk-stratify MCL patients, thus promoting precision imaging in clinical oncology.

Abstract

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare lymphoid malignancy with a poor prognosis characterised by frequent relapse and short durations of treatment response. Most patients present with aggressive disease, but there exist indolent subtypes without the need for immediate intervention. The very heterogeneous behaviour of MCL is genetically characterised by the translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), leading to Cyclin D1 overexpression with distinct clinical and biological characteristics and outcomes. There is still an unfulfilled need for precise MCL prognostication in real-time. Machine learning and deep learning neural networks are rapidly advancing technologies with promising results in numerous fields of application. This study develops and compares the performance of deep learning (DL) algorithms and radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models to predict MCL relapse on baseline CT scans. Five classification algorithms were used, including three deep learning models (3D SEResNet50, 3D DenseNet, and an optimised 3D CNN) and two machine learning models based on K-nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Random Forest (RF). The best performing method, our optimised 3D CNN, predicted MCL relapse with a 70% accuracy, better than the 3D SEResNet50 (62%) and the 3D DenseNet (59%). The second-best performing method was the KNN-based machine learning model (64%) after principal component analysis for improved accuracy. Our optimised CNN developed by ourselves correctly predicted MCL relapse in 70% of the patients on baseline CT imaging. Once prospectively tested in clinical trials with a larger sample size, our proposed 3D deep learning model could facilitate clinical management by precision imaging in MCL.

Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment

BACKGROUND

Differentiating gliomas and primary CNS lymphoma represents a diagnostic challenge with important therapeutic ramifications. Biopsy is the preferred method of diagnosis, while MR imaging in conjunction with machine learning has shown promising results in differentiating these tumors.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the quality of reporting and risk of bias, assess data bases with which the machine learning classification algorithms were developed, the algorithms themselves, and their performance.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science Core Collection were searched according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

STUDY SELECTION

From 11,727 studies, 23 peer-reviewed studies used machine learning to differentiate primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas in 2276 patients.

DATA ANALYSIS

Characteristics of data sets and machine learning algorithms were extracted. A meta-analysis on a subset of studies was performed. Reporting quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) and Prediction Model Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.961) and accuracy (91.2%) in external validation were achieved by logistic regression and support vector machines models using conventional radiomic features. Meta-analysis of machine learning classifiers using these features yielded a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.944 (95% CI, 0.898-0.99). The median TRIPOD score was 51.7%. The risk of bias was high for 16 studies.

LIMITATIONS

Exclusion of abstracts decreased the sensitivity in evaluating all published studies. Meta-analysis had high heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning-based methods of differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from gliomas have shown great potential, but most studies lack large, balanced data sets and external validation. Assessment of the studies identified multiple deficiencies in reporting quality and risk of bias. These factors reduce the generalizability and reproducibility of the findings.

A new scheme of global feature management improved the performance and stability of radiomics model: a study based on CT images of acute brainstem infarction

OBJECTIVE

The performance and stability of radiomics model caused by dimension reduction remain being confronted with major challenges. In this study, we aimed to propose a new scheme of global feature management independent of dimension reduction to improve it.

METHODS

The non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) images of acute brainstem infarction (ABI) from two medical centers were used as test and validation sets. A new scheme was constructed based on global feature management, and the traditional scheme dependent on dimension reduction was used as control. The radiomic features of NCCT images were extracted in Matlab R2013a. The performance of prediction model was evaluated by the generalized linear model (GLM) and multivariate logistic regression. And, the stability of radiomics model was evaluated with the difference of area under curve (AUC) between the test and validation sets.

RESULTS

Compared with the traditional scheme, the new scheme presented a similar detection performance (AUC: 0.875 vs. 0.883), yet a better performance in predicting prognosis (AUC: 0.864, OR = 0.917, p = 0.021 vs. AUC:0.806, OR = 0.972, p = 0.007). All these results were well verified in an independent validation set. Moreover, the new scheme showed stronger stability in both the detection model (ΔAUC: 0.013 vs. 0.039) and prediction model (ΔAUC = 0.004 vs. 0.044).

CONCLUSION

Although there might be several limitations, this study proved that the scheme of global feature management independent of dimension reduction could be a powerful supplement to the radiomics methodology.

KEY POINTS

• The new scheme (S_wavelet) presented similar detection performances for ABI with the traditional scheme. • A better predictive performance for END was found in the new scheme (S_wavelet) compared with the traditional scheme. • Stronger model stability was found in both the detection and prediction models based on the new scheme.

A Machine Learning Model Predicts the Outcome of SRS for Residual Arteriovenous malformations after partial embolization- A Real-World Clinical Obstacle

PURPOSE

To propose a machine learning (ML) model predicting the favorable outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) after partial embolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty bAVM patients who underwent partial embolization followed by SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were randomly split into training datasets (n=100) and testing datasets (n=30). Radiomics and dosimetric features were extracted from pre-SRS treatment images. Feature selection was performed to select appropriate radiomics and dosimetric features. Three ML algorithms were applied to construct models using selected features respectively. A total of 9 models were trained to predict favorable outcomes (obliteration without complication) of bAVMs. The efficacy of these models was evaluated on the testing dataset using mean accuracy (ACC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The obliteration rate of this cohort was 70.77% (92/130) with a mean follow-up period of 43.8 (Range 12-108 months) months. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 89 (68.46%) patients. Four radiomics features and 7 dosimetric features were selected for ML model construction. The dosimetric SVM showed the best performance on the training dataset, with an ACC and AUC of 0.74 and 0.78 respectively. The dosimetric SVM model also showed the best performance on the testing dataset where the ACC and AUC were 0.83 and 0.77 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dosimetric features are good predictors of prognosis for patients with partially embolized bAVM followed by SRS therapy. The use of ML models is an innovative method for predicting favorable outcomes of partially embolized bAVM followed by SRS therapy.

Beyond Glioma: The Utility of Radiomic Analysis for Non-Glial Intracranial Tumors

Simple Summary

Tumor qualities, such as growth rate, firmness, and intrusion into healthy tissue, can be very important for operation planning and further treatment. Radiomics is a promising new method that allows the determination of some of these qualities on images performed before surgery. In this article, we provide a review of the use of radiomics in various tumors of the central nervous system, such as metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Abstract

The field of radiomics is rapidly expanding and gaining a valuable role in neuro-oncology. The possibilities related to the use of radiomic analysis, such as distinguishing types of malignancies, predicting tumor grade, determining the presence of particular molecular markers, consistency, therapy response, and prognosis, can considerably influence decision-making in medicine in the near future. Even though the main focus of radiomic analyses has been on glial CNS tumors, studies on other intracranial tumors have shown encouraging results. Therefore, as the main focus of this review, we performed an analysis of publications on PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on radiomics in CNS metastases, lymphoma, meningioma, medulloblastoma, and pituitary tumors.

Non-Invasive Preoperative Imaging Differential Diagnosis of Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma and Angiomatous Meningioma: A Novel Developed and Validated Multiparametric MRI-Based Clini-Radiomic Model

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative differentiation of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma can greatly assist operation plan making and prognosis prediction. In this study, a clini-radiomic model combining radiomic and clinical features was used to distinguish intracranial hemangiopericytoma and hemangioma meningioma preoperatively.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients with intracranial hemangiopericytoma and 73 patients with angiomatous meningioma from the Tiantan Hospital were retrospectively reviewed and randomly assigned to training and validation sets. Radiomic features were extracted from MR images, the elastic net and recursive feature elimination algorithms were applied to select radiomic features for constructing a fusion radiomic model. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to construct a clinical model, then a clini-radiomic model incorporating the fusion radiomic model and clinical features was constructed for individual predictions. The calibration, discriminating capacity, and clinical usefulness were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Six significant radiomic features were selected to construct a fusion radiomic model that achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.900 and 0.900 in the training and validation sets, respectively. A clini-radiomic model that incorporated the radiomic model and clinical features was constructed and showed good discrimination and calibration, with an AUC of 0.920 in the training set and 0.910 in the validation set. The analysis of the decision curve showed that the fusion radiomic model and clini-radiomic model were clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clini-radiomic model showed great performance and high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma, and could contribute to non-invasive development of individualized diagnosis and treatment for these patients.

Longitudinal CT Imaging to Explore the Predictive Power of 3D Radiomic Tumour Heterogeneity in Precise Imaging of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

The study's primary aim is to evaluate the predictive performance of CT-derived 3D radiomics for MCL risk stratification. The secondary objective is to search for radiomic features associated with sustained remission. Included were 70 patients: 31 MCL patients and 39 control subjects with normal axillary lymph nodes followed over five years. Radiomic analysis of all targets (n = 745) was performed and features selected using the Mann Whitney U test; the discriminative power of identifying "high-risk MCL" was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The four radiomic features, "Uniformity", "Entropy", "Skewness" and "Difference Entropy" showed predictive significance for relapse (p < 0.05)-in contrast to the routine size measurements, which showed no relevant difference. The best prognostication for relapse achieved the feature "Uniformity" (AUC-ROC-curve 0.87; optimal cut-off ≤0.0159 to predict relapse with 87% sensitivity, 65% specificity, 69% accuracy). Several radiomic features, including the parameter "Short Axis," were associated with sustained remission. CT-derived 3D radiomics improves the predictive estimation of MCL patients; in combination with the ability to identify potential radiomic features that are characteristic for sustained remission, it may assist physicians in the clinical management of MCL.

Non-invasive preoperative imaging differential diagnosis of pineal region tumor: A novel developed and validated multiparametric MRI-based clinicoradiomic model

BACKGROUND

Preoperative differential diagnosis of pineal region tumor can greatly assist clinical decision-making and avoid economic costs and complications caused by unnecessary radiotherapy or invasive procedures. The present study was performed to pre-operatively distinguish pineal region germinoma and pinealoblastoma using a clinicoradiomic model by incorporating radiomic and clinical features.

METHODS

134 pineal region tumor patients (germinoma, 69; pinealoblastoma, 65) with complete clinic-radiological and histopathological data from Tiantan hospital were retrospectively reviewed and randomly assigned to training and validation sets. Radiomic features were extracted from MR images, then the elastic net and recursive feature elimination algorithms were applied to select radiomic features for constructing a fusion radiomic model. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to select the clinical features, and a clinicoradiomic model incorporating the fusion radiomic model and selected clinical features was constructed for individual predictions. The calibration, discriminating capacity, and clinical usefulness were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven significant radiomic features were selected to construct a fusion radiomic model that achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.920 and 0.880 in the training and validation sets, respectively. A clinicoradiomic model that incorporated the radiomic model and four selected clinical features was constructed and showed good discrimination and calibration, with an AUC of 0.950 in the training set and 0.940 in the validation set. The analysis of the decision curve showed that the radiomic model and clinicoradiomic model were clinically useful for patients with pineal region tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinicoradiomic model showed great performance and high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of germinoma and pinealoblastoma, and could contribute to non-invasive development of individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with pineal region tumor.

Differentiation between Germinoma and Craniopharyngioma Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning

For the tumors located in the anterior skull base, germinoma and craniopharyngioma (CP) are unusual types with similar clinical manifestations and imaging features. The difference in treatment strategies and outcomes of patients highlights the importance of making an accurate preoperative diagnosis. This retrospective study enrolled 107 patients diagnosed with germinoma (n = 44) and CP (n = 63). The region of interest (ROI) was drawn independently by two researchers. Radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced T1WI and T2WI sequences. Here, we established the diagnosis models with a combination of three selection methods, as well as three classifiers. After training the models, their performances were evaluated on the independent validation cohort and compared based on the index of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation cohort. Nine models were established and compared to find the optimal one defined with the highest AUC in the validation cohort. For the models applied in the contrast-enhanced T1WI images, RF_S + RF_C and LASSO + LDA were observed to be the optimal models with AUCs of 0.91. For the models applied in the T2WI images, DC + LDA and LASSO + LDA were observed to be the optimal models with AUCs of 0.88. The evidence of this study indicated that radiomics-based machine learning could be potentially considered as the radiological method in the presurgical differential diagnosis of germinoma and CP with a reliable diagnostic performance.

Machine learning in neuroimaging: from research to clinical practice

Neuroimaging is critical in clinical care and research, enabling us to investigate the brain in health and disease. There is a complex link between the brain's morphological structure, physiological architecture, and the corresponding imaging characteristics. The shape, function, and relationships between various brain areas change during development and throughout life, disease, and recovery. Like few other areas, neuroimaging benefits from advanced analysis techniques to fully exploit imaging data for studying the brain and its function. Recently, machine learning has started to contribute (a) to anatomical measurements, detection, segmentation, and quantification of lesions and disease patterns, (b) to the rapid identification of acute conditions such as stroke, or (c) to the tracking of imaging changes over time. As our ability to image and analyze the brain advances, so does our understanding of its intricate relationships and their role in therapeutic decision-making. Here, we review the current state of the art in using machine learning techniques to exploit neuroimaging data for clinical care and research, providing an overview of clinical applications and their contribution to fundamental computational neuroscience.

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics for Predicting Early Recurrence of Glioblastoma

Purpose

Early recurrence of glioblastoma after standard treatment makes patient care challenging. This study aimed to assess preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics for predicting early recurrence of glioblastoma.

Patients and Methods

A total of 122 patients (training cohort: n = 86; validation cohort: n = 36) with pathologically confirmed glioblastoma were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative brain MRI images were analyzed for both radiomics and the Visually Accessible Rembrandt Image (VASARI) features of glioblastoma. Models incorporating MRI radiomics, the VASARI parameters, and clinical variables were developed and presented in a nomogram. Performance was assessed based on calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

Results

The nomogram consisting of the radiomic signatures, the VASARI parameters, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) values showed good discrimination between the patients with early recurrence and those with later recurrence, with an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77-0.94) in the training cohort and 0.84 [95% CI, 0.71-0.97] in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis demonstrated favorable clinical application of the nomogram.

Conclusion

This study showed the potential usefulness of preoperative brain MRI radiomics in predicting the early recurrence of glioblastoma, which should be helpful in personalized management of glioblastoma.

Evolving Role and Translation of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Adult and Pediatric Neuro-Oncology

Exponential technologic advancements in imaging, high-performance computing, and artificial intelligence, in addition to increasing access to vast amounts of diverse data, have revolutionized the role of imaging in medicine. Radiomics is defined as a high-throughput feature-extraction method that unlocks microscale quantitative data hidden within standard-of-care medical imaging. Radiogenomics is defined as the linkage between imaging and genomics information. Multiple radiomics and radiogenomics studies performed on conventional and advanced neuro-oncology image modalities show that they have the potential to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, classify tumor subgroups, and predict recurrence, survival, and mutation status with high accuracy. In this article, we outline the technical steps involved in radiomics and radiogenomics analyses with the use of artificial intelligence methods and review current applications in adult and pediatric neuro-oncology.

Current Advances and Challenges in Radiomics of Brain Tumors

Imaging diagnosis is crucial for early detection and monitoring of brain tumors. Radiomics enable the extraction of a large mass of quantitative features from complex clinical imaging arrays, and then transform them into high-dimensional data which can subsequently be mined to find their relevance with the tumor's histological features, which reflect underlying genetic mutations and malignancy, along with grade, progression, therapeutic effect, or even overall survival (OS). Compared to traditional brain imaging, radiomics provides quantitative information linked to meaningful biologic characteristics and application of deep learning which sheds light on the full automation of imaging diagnosis. Recent studies have shown that radiomics' application is broad in identifying primary tumor, differential diagnosis, grading, evaluation of mutation status and aggression, prediction of treatment response and recurrence in pituitary tumors, gliomas, and brain metastases. In this descriptive review, besides establishing a general understanding among protocols, results, and clinical significance of these studies, we further discuss the current limitations along with future development of radiomics.