Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mapping of Brain Tumor Burden: Clinical Implications for Neurosurgical Management: Case Report

Identification of a Single-Dose, Low-Flip-Angle-Based CBV Threshold for Fractional Tumor Burden Mapping in Recurrent Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

DSC-MR imaging can be used to generate fractional tumor burden (FTB) maps via application of relative CBV thresholds to spatially differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effects (PTRE). Image-localized histopathology was previously used to validate FTB maps derived from a reference DSC-MR imaging protocol by using preload, a moderate flip angle (MFA, 60°), and postprocessing leakage correction. Recently, a DSC-MR imaging protocol with a low flip angle (LFA, 30°) with no preload was shown to provide leakage-corrected relative CBV (rCBV) equivalent to the reference protocol. This study aimed to identify the rCBV thresholds for the LFA protocol that generate the most accurate FTB maps, concordant with those obtained from the reference MFA protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with grade-IV glioblastoma who had prior surgical resection and received chemotherapy and radiation therapy were included in the study. Two sets of DSC-MR imaging data were collected sequentially first by using LFA protocol with no preload, which served as the preload for the subsequent MFA protocol. Standardized relative CBV maps (sRCBV) were obtained for each patient and coregistered with the anatomic postcontrast T1-weighted images. The reference MFA-based FTB maps were computed by using previously published sRCBV thresholds (1.0 and 1.56). A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was conducted to identify the optimal, voxelwise LFA sRCBV thresholds, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the LFA-based FTB maps were computed with respect to the MFA-based reference.

RESULTS

The mean sRCBV values of tumors across patients exhibited strong agreement (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.99) between the 2 protocols. Using the ROC analysis, the optimal lower LFA threshold that accurately distinguishes PTRE from tumor recurrence was found to be 1.0 (sensitivity: 87.77%; specificity: 90.22%), equivalent to the ground truth. To identify aggressive tumor regions, the ROC analysis identified an upper LFA threshold of 1.37 (sensitivity: 90.87%; specificity: 91.10%) for the reference MFA threshold of 1.56.

CONCLUSIONS

For LFA-based FTB maps, an sRCBV threshold of 1.0 and 1.37 can differentiate PTRE from recurrent tumors. FTB maps aid in surgical planning, guiding pathologic diagnosis and treatment strategies in the recurrent setting. This study further confirms the reliability of single-dose LFA-based DSC-MR imaging.

Fractional tumor burden maps increase the confidence of reading brain MR perfusion

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Various methods exist to perform and post-process perfusion weighted MR imaging in the post-treatment imaging of glioma patients to differentiate tumor progression from tumor-related abnormalities. One of these post-processing methods produces 'fractional tumor burden' maps. This multi-reader study investigated the clinical feasibility of fractional tumor burden maps on real world data from radiological follow-up of high-grade astrocytoma patients.

METHODS

Five readers with background in radiology and varying levels of experience were tasked with assessing 30 astrocytoma and glioblastoma patients during one reader session. First, they were provided with a dataset of conventional MRI sequences, including perfusion MRI with regional cerebral blood volume maps. Then the dataset was expanded with a corresponding fractional tumor burden maps. Diagnostic accuracy, duration of post-processing, duration of the assessment of the fractional tumor burden maps, the diagnostic confidence reported by the readers and their diagnoses were recorded. Final diagnosis was determined by clinical and radiological follow-up and/or histopathological data used as gold standard.

RESULTS

A mean sensitivity of 83.3 % and mean specificity of 55.1 % was obtained without the use of fractional tumor burden maps, whereas their additional of fractional tumor burden maps resulted in a mean sensitivity and specificity of 79.5 % and 54.2 %, respectively. Diagnostic accuracies with and without fractional tumor burden maps were not significantly different (Z = 0.76, p = 0.450). The median time spent post-processing was 313 s, while the median duration of the assessment of the FTB maps was 19 s. Interestingly, reader confidence increased significantly after adding the fractional tumor burden-maps to the assessment (Z = 454, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

While the use of fractional tumor burden maps does not carry additional value in the radiological follow-up of post-operative high-grade astrocytoma and glioblastoma patients, it does give readers more confidence in their diagnosis.

Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion Metrics Improve Agreement in Neuroradiologists' Clinical Interpretations of Posttreatment High-Grade Glioma Surveillance MR Imaging-An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR perfusion has shown value in the evaluation of posttreatment high-grade gliomas, but few studies have shown its impact on the consistency and confidence of neuroradiologists' interpretation in routine clinical practice. We evaluated the impact of adding MR perfusion metrics to conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging in posttreatment high-grade glioma surveillance imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 45 adults with high-grade gliomas who had posttreatment perfusion MR imaging. Four neuroradiologists assigned Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System scores for each examination on the basis of the interpretation of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and then after the addition of arterial spin-labeling-CBF, DSC-relative CBV, and DSC-fractional tumor burden. Interrater agreement and rater agreement with a multidisciplinary consensus group were assessed with κ statistics. Raters used a 5-point Likert scale to report confidence scores. The frequency of clinically meaningful score changes resulting from the addition of each perfusion metric was determined.

RESULTS

Interrater agreement was moderate for contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone (κ = 0.63) and higher with perfusion metrics (arterial spin-labeling-CBF, κ = 0.67; DSC-relative CBV, κ = 0.66; DSC-fractional tumor burden, κ = 0.70). Agreement between raters and consensus was highest with DSC-fractional tumor burden (κ = 0.66-0.80). Confidence scores were highest with DSC-fractional tumor burden. Across all raters, the addition of perfusion resulted in clinically meaningful interpretation changes in 2%-20% of patients compared with contrast-enhanced MR imaging alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding perfusion to contrast-enhanced MR imaging improved interrater agreement, rater agreement with consensus, and rater confidence in the interpretation of posttreatment high-grade glioma MR imaging, with the highest agreement and confidence scores seen with DSC-fractional tumor burden. Perfusion MR imaging also resulted in interpretation changes that could change therapeutic management in up to 20% of patients.

Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1

Preoperative clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gliomas, brain tumors with dismal outcomes due to their infiltrative properties, still rely on conventional structural MRI, which does not deliver information on tumor genotype and is limited in the delineation of diffuse gliomas. The GliMR COST action wants to raise awareness about the state of the art of advanced MRI techniques in gliomas and their possible clinical translation or lack thereof. This review describes current methods, limits, and applications of advanced MRI for the preoperative assessment of glioma, summarizing the level of clinical validation of different techniques. In this first part, we discuss dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted MRI, vessel imaging, and magnetic resonance fingerprinting. The second part of this review addresses magnetic resonance spectroscopy, chemical exchange saturation transfer, susceptibility-weighted imaging, MRI-PET, MR elastography, and MR-based radiomics applications. Evidence Level: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2.

Identification of single-dose, dual-echo based CBV threshold for fractional tumor burden mapping in recurrent glioblastoma

Background

Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is widely used to distinguish high grade glioma recurrence from post treatment radiation effects (PTRE). Application of rCBV thresholds yield maps to distinguish between regional tumor burden and PTRE, a biomarker termed the fractional tumor burden (FTB). FTB is generally measured using conventional double-dose, single-echo DSC-MRI protocols; recently, a single-dose, dual-echo DSC-MRI protocol was clinically validated by direct comparison to the conventional double-dose, single-echo protocol. As the single-dose, dual-echo acquisition enables reduction in the contrast agent dose and provides greater pulse sequence parameter flexibility, there is a compelling need to establish dual-echo DSC-MRI based FTB mapping. In this study, we determine the optimum standardized rCBV threshold for the single-dose, dual-echo protocol to generate FTB maps that best match those derived from the reference standard, double-dose, single-echo protocol.

Methods

The study consisted of 23 high grade glioma patients undergoing perfusion scans to confirm suspected tumor recurrence. We sequentially acquired single dose, dual-echo and double dose, single-echo DSC-MRI data. For both protocols, we generated leakage-corrected standardized rCBV maps. Standardized rCBV (sRCBV) thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to compute single-echo FTB maps as the reference for delineating PTRE (sRCBV < 1.0), tumor with moderate angiogenesis (1.0 < sRCBV < 1.75), and tumor with high angiogenesis (sRCBV > 1.75) regions. To assess the sRCBV agreement between acquisition protocols, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was computed between the mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimum dual-echo sRCBV threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) and the standard reference threshold (1.75) for the dual-echo sRCBV threshold.

Results

The mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients showed a strong correlation (CCC = 0.96) between the two protocols. The ROC analysis showed maximum accuracy at thresholds of 1.0 (delineate PTRE from tumor) and 1.64 (differentiate aggressive tumors). The reference threshold (1.75) and the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) yielded similar accuracy, with slight differences in sensitivity and specificity which were not statistically significant (1.75 threshold: Sensitivity = 81.94%; Specificity: 87.23%; Accuracy: 84.58% and 1.64 threshold: Sensitivity = 84.48%; Specificity: 84.97%; Accuracy: 84.73%).

Conclusions

The optimal sRCBV threshold for single-dose, dual-echo protocol was found to be 1.0 and 1.64 for distinguishing tumor recurrence from PTRE; however, minimal differences were observed when using the standard threshold (1.75) as the upper threshold, suggesting that the standard threshold could be used for both protocols. While the prior study validated the agreement of the mean sRCBV values between the protocols, this study confirmed that their voxel-wise agreement is suitable for reliable FTB mapping. Dual-echo DSC-MRI acquisitions enable robust single-dose sRCBV and FTB mapping, provide pulse sequence parameter flexibility and should improve reproducibility by mitigating variations in preload dose and incubation time.

DSC Perfusion MRI-Derived Fractional Tumor Burden and Relative CBV Differentiate Tumor Progression and Radiation Necrosis in Brain Metastases Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Differentiation between tumor and radiation necrosis in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery is challenging. We hypothesized that MR perfusion and metabolic metrics can differentiate radiation necrosis from progressive tumor in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated MRIs comprising DSC, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging in subjects with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. For each lesion, we obtained the mean normalized and standardized relative CBV and fractional tumor burden, volume transfer constant, and normalized maximum CBF, as well as the maximum standardized uptake value in a subset of subjects who underwent FDG-PET. Relative CBV thresholds of 1 and 1.75 were used to define low and high fractional tumor burden.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects with 37 lesions (20 radiation necrosis, 17 tumor) were included. Compared with radiation necrosis, tumor had increased mean normalized and standardized relative CBV (P = .002) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .005; standardized, P = .003) and decreased low fractional tumor burden (normalized, P = .03; standardized, P = .01). The area under the curve showed that relative CBV (normalized = 0.80; standardized = 0.79) and high fractional tumor burden (normalized = 0.77; standardized = 0.78) performed the best to discriminate tumor and radiation necrosis. For tumor prediction, the normalized relative CBV cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 70.0%, while the standardized cutoff of ≥1.75 yielded a sensitivity of 41.2% and specificity of 95.0%. No significance was found with the volume transfer constant, normalized CBF, and standardized uptake value.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased relative CBV and high fractional tumor burden (defined by a threshold relative CBV of ≥1.75) best differentiated tumor from radiation necrosis in subjects with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Performance of normalized and standardized approaches was similar.