1
|
Ivanidze J, Chang SJ, Haghdel A, Kim JT, Roy Choudhury A, Wu A, Ramakrishna R, Schwartz TH, Cisse B, Stieg P, Muller L, Osborne JR, Magge RS, Karakatsanis NA, Roytman M, Lin E, Pannullo SC, Palmer JD, Knisely JPS. [Ga68] DOTATATE PET/MRI-guided radiosurgical treatment planning and response assessment in meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:1526-1535. [PMID: 38553990 PMCID: PMC11300004 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our purpose was to determine the utility of [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma response assessment following radiosurgery. METHODS Patients with meningioma prospectively underwent postoperative DOTATATE PET/MRI. Co-registered PET and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI were employed for radiosurgery planning. Follow-up DOTATATE PET/MRI was performed at 6-12 months post-radiosurgery. Maximum absolute standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV ratio (SUVRSSS) referencing superior sagittal sinus (SSS) blood pool were obtained. Size change was determined by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Association of SUVRSSS change magnitude and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients with 64 tumors (26% World Health Organization [WHO]-1, 41% WHO-2, 26% WHO-3, and 7% WHO-unknown) were prospectively followed post stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT; mean dose: 30 Gy, modal dose 35 Gy, mean of 5 fractions). Post-irradiation SUV and SUVRSSS decreased by 37.4% and 44.4%, respectively (P < .0001). Size product decreased by 8.9%, thus failing to reach the 25% significance threshold as determined by RANO guidelines. Mean follow-up time was 26 months (range: 6-44). Overall mean PFS was 83% and 100%/100%/54% in WHO-1/-2/-3 subcohorts, respectively, at 34 months. At maximum follow-up (42-44 months), PFS was 100%/83%/54% in WHO-1/-2/-3 subcohorts, respectively. Cox regression analyses revealed a hazard ratio of 0.48 for 10-unit reduction in SUVRSSS in the SRS cohort. CONCLUSIONS DOTATATE PET SUV and SUVRSSS demonstrated marked, significant decrease post-radiosurgery. Lesion size decrease was statistically significant; however, it was not clinically significant by RANO criteria. DOTATATE PET/MR thus represents a promising imaging biomarker for response assessment in meningiomas treated with radiosurgery. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER NCT04081701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Se Jung Chang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arsalan Haghdel
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joon Tae Kim
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arindam Roy Choudhury
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alan Wu
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Theodore H Schwartz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Babacar Cisse
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Philip Stieg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leland Muller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rajiv S Magge
- Brain Tumor Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Michelle Roytman
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eaton Lin
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jonathan P S Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dai Q, Li X, Fang Y, Shen B, Wei J, Xie Q, Wu W, Wang M. Gross-total resection in optic nerve sheath meningiomas: minimally invasive and cosmetic pleasing. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2024; 262:2661-2673. [PMID: 38502351 PMCID: PMC11271350 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06447-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) is one of the most challenging tumors in orbital surgery. From the perspective of mental health and patient needs, we analyzed the necessity and importance of the endoscopic transnasal approach (ETA) combined with optic nerve transection (ONT) in gross-total resection (GTR) in ONSM patients with residual vision and aim to broaden the use of ONT for specific people. METHODS The authors included patients with ONSMs who were treated between 2014 and 2022. We divided those cases into two groups named ETA group and lateral orbitotomy approach (LOA) group. We present the application of ETA and analyze the preoperative indication of the ONT and compared the advantages and disadvantages between ETA and LOA. The degree of tumor resection was based on imaging and surgical evaluation. RESULTS A total of 23 patients with ONSM were included. Sixteen patients underwent ETA, and seven underwent LOA. Among ETA cases, GTR was achieved in 14 patients with ONT and most patients maintained normal eye movement function (75%) and morphology (93.75%). In the ETA group, 14 patients experienced vision loss, while two other patients saw improvements in vision. And proptosis was alleviated (5.20 ± 2.34 vs 0.27 ± 0.46, p < 0.0001). Six patients with blindness and proptosis of the LOA group resulted in GTR with ONT and ophthalmectomy. Although intracranial extension and recurrence included no cases in the two groups, a significant psychological gap was presented due to cosmetic problems. CONCLUSIONS Under the premise of reducing damage and improving aesthetics, the selection of ETA combined with ONT to gross-total resect ONSMs successfully provides a minimally invasive access with acceptable complications. As an important adjunct to GTR in the surgical treatment of ONSM, the scope of ONT application should be expanded to relieve the patient's psychological burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Dai
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Xinyu Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Yenan Fang
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Bingyan Shen
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Jinfei Wei
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Qiqi Xie
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China
| | - Wencan Wu
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
| | - Min Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Visual Science, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325027, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Albert NL, Preusser M, Traub-Weidinger T, Tolboom N, Law I, Palmer JD, Guedj E, Furtner J, Fraioli F, Huang RY, Johnson DR, Deroose CM, Herrmann K, Vogelbaum M, Chang S, Tonn JC, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Verger A, Ivanidze J, Galldiks N. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x. [PMID: 38898354 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna Health Care Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Division Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric Guedj
- Institut Fresnel, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Julia Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) - University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Apra C, Bemora JS, Palfi S. Achieving Gross Total Resection in Neurosurgery: A Review of Intraoperative Techniques and Their Influence on Surgical Goals. World Neurosurg 2024; 185:246-253. [PMID: 38431211 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
The definition of complete resection in neurosurgery depends on tumor type, surgical aims, and postoperative investigations, directly guiding the choice of intraoperative tools. Most common tumor types present challenges in achieving complete resection due to their infiltrative nature and anatomical constraints. The development of adjuvant treatments has altered the balance between oncological aims and surgical risks. We review local recurrence associated with incomplete resection based on different definitions and emphasize the importance of achieving maximal safe resection in all tumor types. Intraoperative techniques that aid surgeons in identifying tumor boundaries are used in practice and in preclinical or clinical research settings. They encompass both conservative and invasive techniques. Among them, morphological tools include imaging modalities such as intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography. Fluorescence-guided surgery, mainly using 5-aminolevulinic acid, enhances gross total resection in glioblastomas. Nuclear methods, including positron emission tomography probes, provide tumor detection based on beta or gamma emission after a radiotracer injection. Mass spectrometry- and spectroscopy-based methods offer molecular insights. The adoption of these techniques depends on their relevance, effectiveness, and feasibility. With the emergence of positron emission tomography imaging for use in recurrence benchmarking, positron emission tomography probes raise particular interest among those tools. While all such tools provide valuable insights, their clinical benefits need further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Apra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Biotherapies Department, INSERM U955, Créteil, France; Faculté de Santé, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France.
| | - Joseph Synèse Bemora
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France; Department of Neurosurgery, Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona Hospital, Antananarivo University, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - Stéphane Palfi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Biotherapies Department, INSERM U955, Créteil, France; Faculté de Santé, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simon M, Gousias K. Grading meningioma resections: the Simpson classification and beyond. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2024; 166:28. [PMID: 38261164 PMCID: PMC10806026 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-05910-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Technological (and also methodological) advances in neurosurgery and neuroimaging have prompted a reappraisal of Simpson's grading of the extent of meningioma resections. To the authors, the published evidence supports the tenets of this classification. Meningioma is an often surgically curable dura-based disease. An extent of meningioma resection classification needs to account for a clinically meaningful variation of the risk of recurrence depending on the aggressiveness of the management of the (dural) tumor origin.Nevertheless, the 1957 Simpson classification undoubtedly suffers from many limitations. Important issues include substantial problems with the applicability of the grading paradigm in different locations. Most notably, tumor location and growth pattern often determine the eventual extent of resection, i.e., the Simpson grading does not reflect what is surgically achievable. Another very significant problem is the inherent subjectivity of relying on individual intraoperative assessments. Neuroimaging advances such as the use of somatostatin receptor PET scanning may help to overcome this central problem. Tumor malignancy and biology in general certainly influence the role of the extent of resection but may not need to be incorporated in an actual extent of resection grading scheme as long as one does not aim at developing a prognostic score. Finally, all attempts at grading meningioma resections use tumor recurrence as the endpoint. However, especially in view of radiosurgery/radiotherapy options, the clinical significance of recurrent tumor growth varies greatly between cases.In summary, while the extent of resection certainly matters in meningioma surgery, grading resections remains controversial. Given the everyday clinical relevance of this issue, a multicenter prospective register or study effort is probably warranted (including a prominent focus on advanced neuroimaging).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Universitätsklinikum OWL, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Konstantinos Gousias
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Academic Hospital Luenen, University of Muenster, Luenen, Germany
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Athens Medical Center, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teske N, Biczok A, Quach S, Dekorsy FJ, Forbrig R, Bodensohn R, Niyazi M, Tonn JC, Albert NL, Schichor C, Ueberschaer M. Postoperative [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT imaging is prognostic for progression-free survival in meningioma WHO grade 1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 51:206-217. [PMID: 37642702 PMCID: PMC10684417 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06400-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor resection represents the first-line treatment for symptomatic meningiomas, and the extent of resection has been shown to be of prognostic importance. Assessment of tumor remnants with somatostatin receptor PET proves to be superior to intraoperative estimation with Simpson grading or MRI. In this preliminary study, we evaluate the prognostic relevance of postoperative PET for progression-free survival in meningiomas. METHODS We conducted a post hoc analysis on a prospective patient cohort with resected meningioma WHO grade 1. Patients received postoperative MRI and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT and were followed regularly with MRI surveillance scans for detection of tumor recurrence/progression. RESULTS We included 46 patients with 49 tumors. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.8 ± 1.7 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.7. Local tumor progression occurred in 7/49 patients (14%) after a median follow-up of 52 months. Positive PET was associated with an increased risk for progression (*p = 0.015) and a lower progression-free survival (*p = 0.029), whereas MRI was not. 20 out of 20 patients (100%) with negative PET findings remained recurrence-free. The location of recurrence/progression on MRI was adjacent to regions where postoperative PET indicated tumor remnants in all cases. Gross tumor volumes were higher on PET compared to MRI (*p = 0.032). CONCLUSION Our data show that [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT is highly sensitive in revealing tumor remnants in patients with meningioma WHO grade 1. Negative PET findings were associated with a higher progression-free survival, thus improving surveillance. In patients with tumor remnants, additional PET can optimize adjuvant radiotherapy target planning of surgically resected meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Annamaria Biczok
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska J Dekorsy
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Center for Cancer Research (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Ueberschaer
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loken EK, Huang RY. Advanced Meningioma Imaging. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:335-345. [PMID: 37210124 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive imaging methods are used to accurately diagnose meningiomas and track their growth and location. These techniques, including computed tomography, MRI, and nuclear medicine, are also being used to gather more information about the biology of the tumors and potentially predict their grade and impact on prognosis. In this article, we will discuss the current and developing uses of these imaging techniques including additional analysis using radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas, including treatment planning and prediction of tumor behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik K Loken
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ucisik FE, Huell D, Choi J, Gidley PW, DeMonte F, Hanna EY, Learned KO. Post-Treatment Imaging Evaluation of the Skull Base. Semin Roentgenol 2023; 58:217-236. [PMID: 37507165 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Eymen Ucisik
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Derek Huell
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeanie Choi
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul W Gidley
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Franco DeMonte
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX
| | - Kim O Learned
- Department of Neuroradiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hall J, Wang TJC, Yanagihara TK. Commentary: Using 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET for Postoperative Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy Planning in Patients With Meningioma: A Case Series. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:e1-e2. [PMID: 36757193 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ted K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gousias K, Trakolis L, Simon M. Meningiomas with CNS invasion. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1189606. [PMID: 37456997 PMCID: PMC10339387 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1189606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
CNS invasion has been included as an independent criterion for the diagnosis of a high-grade (WHO and CNS grade 2 and 3) meningioma in the 2016 and more recently in the 2021 WHO classification. However, the prognostic role of brain invasion has recently been questioned. Also, surgical treatment for brain invasive meningiomas may pose specific challenges. We conducted a systematic review of the 2016-2022 literature on brain invasive meningiomas in Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The prognostic relevance of brain invasion as a stand-alone criterion is still unclear. Additional and larger studies using robust definitions of histological brain invasion and addressing the issue of sampling errors are clearly warranted. Although the necessity of molecular profiling in meningioma grading, prognostication and decision making in the future is obvious, specific markers for brain invasion are lacking for the time being. Advanced neuroimaging may predict CNS invasion preoperatively. The extent of resection (e.g., the Simpson grading) is an important predictor of tumor recurrence especially in higher grade meningiomas, but also - although likely to a lesser degree - in benign tumors, and therefore also in brain invasive meningiomas with and without other histological features of atypia or malignancy. Hence, surgery for brain invasive meningiomas should follow the principles of maximal but safe resections. There are some data to suggest that safety and functional outcomes in such cases may benefit from the armamentarium of surgical adjuncts commonly used for surgery of eloquent gliomas such as intraoperative monitoring, awake craniotomy, DTI tractography and further advanced intraoperative brain tumor visualization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Gousias
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Academic Hospital Lünen, KLW St. Paulus Corporation, Luenen, Germany
- Medical School, Westfaelische Wilhelms University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Leonidas Trakolis
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Marien Academic Hospital Lünen, KLW St. Paulus Corporation, Luenen, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bethel Clinic, Medical School, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gillespie CS, Richardson GE, Mustafa MA, Taweel BA, Bakhsh A, Kumar S, Keshwara SM, Islim AI, Mehta S, Millward CP, Brodbelt AR, Mills SJ, Jenkinson MD. Volumetric Growth and Growth Curve Analysis of Residual Intracranial Meningioma. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:734-744. [PMID: 36656062 PMCID: PMC9988310 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After meningioma surgery, approximately 1 in 3 patients will have residual tumor that requires ongoing imaging surveillance. The precise volumetric growth rates of these tumors are unknown. OBJECTIVE To identify the volumetric growth rates of residual meningioma, growth trajectory, and factors associated with progression. METHODS Patients with residual meningioma identified at a tertiary neurosurgery center between 2004 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Tumor volume was measured using manual segmentation, after surgery and at every follow-up MRI scan. Growth rates were ascertained using a linear mixed-effects model and nonlinear regression analysis of growth trajectories. Progression was defined according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria (40% volume increase). RESULTS There were 236 patients with residual meningioma. One hundred and thirty-two patients (56.0%) progressed according to the RANO criteria, with 86 patients being conservatively managed (65.2%) after progression. Thirteen patients (5.5%) developed clinical progression. Over a median follow-up of 5.3 years (interquartile range, 3.5-8.6 years), the absolute growth rate was 0.11 cm 3 per year and the relative growth rate 4.3% per year. Factors associated with residual meningioma progression in multivariable Cox regression analysis were skull base location (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% CI 1.02-2.50) and increasing Ki-67 index (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.19-9.90). Most meningioma exhibited exponential and logistic growth patterns (median R 2 value 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-0.90). CONCLUSION Absolute and relative growth rates of residual meningioma are low, but most meet the RANO criteria for progression. Location and Ki-67 index can be used to stratify adjuvant treatment and surveillance paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor S. Gillespie
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - George E. Richardson
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mohammad A. Mustafa
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Basel A. Taweel
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ali Bakhsh
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Siddhant Kumar
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sumirat M. Keshwara
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Abdurrahman I. Islim
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Shaveta Mehta
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher P. Millward
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew R. Brodbelt
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Samantha J. Mills
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael D. Jenkinson
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Graillon T, Tabouret E, Salgues B, Horowitz T, Padovani L, Appay R, Farah K, Dufour H, Régis J, Guedj E, Barlier A, Chinot O. Innovative treatments for meningiomas. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:449-463. [PMID: 36959063 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Multi-recurrent high-grade meningiomas remain an unmet medical need in neuro-oncology when iterative surgeries and radiation therapy sessions fail to control tumor growth. Nevertheless, the last 10years have been marked by multiple advances in the comprehension of meningioma tumorigenesis via the discovery of new driver mutations, the identification of activated intracellular signaling pathways, and DNA methylation analyses, providing multiple potential therapeutic targets. Today, Anti-VEGF and mTOR inhibitors are the most used and probably the most active drugs in aggressive meningiomas. Peptide radioactive radiation therapy aims to target SSTR2A receptors, which are strongly expressed in meningiomas, but have an insufficient effect in most aggressive meningiomas, requiring the development of new techniques to increase the dose applied to the tumor. Based on the multiple potential intracellular targets, multiple targeted therapy clinical trials targeting Pi3K-Akt-mTOR and MAP kinase pathways as well as cell cycle and particularly, cyclin D4-6 are ongoing. Recently discovered driver mutations, SMO, Akt, and PI3KCA, offer new targets but are mostly observed in benign meningiomas, limiting their clinical relevance mainly to rare aggressive skull base meningiomas. Therefore, NF2 mutation remains the most frequent mutation and main challenging target in high-grade meningioma. Recently, inhibitors of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which is involved in tumor cell adhesion, were tested in a phase 2 clinical trial with interesting but insufficient activity. The Hippo pathway was demonstrated to interact with NF2/Merlin and could be a promising target in NF2-mutated meningiomas with ongoing multiple preclinical studies and a phase 1 clinical trial. Recent advances in immune landscape comprehension led to the proposal of the use of immunotherapy in meningiomas. Except in rare cases of MSH2/6 mutation or high tumor mass burden, the activity of PD-1 inhibitors remains limited; however, its combination with various radiation therapy modalities is particularly promising. On the whole, therapeutic management of high-grade meningiomas is still challenging even with multiple promising therapeutic targets and innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Graillon
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Neurosurgery department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.
| | - E Tabouret
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| | - B Salgues
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - T Horowitz
- AP-HM, CNRS, centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - L Padovani
- AP-HM, Timone Hospital, Radiotherapy Department, Marseille, France
| | - R Appay
- AP-HM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, Marseille, France
| | - K Farah
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, UMR Inserm 1106, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - H Dufour
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Neurosurgery department, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - J Régis
- Aix-Marseille University, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, UMR Inserm 1106, Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - E Guedj
- AP-HM, CNRS, centrale Marseille, Institut Fresnel, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Nuclear Medicine Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - A Barlier
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Inserm, MMG, Laboratory of Molecular Biology Hospital La Conception, Marseille, France
| | - O Chinot
- Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, CNRS, INP, Inst Neurophysiopathol, CHU Timone, Service de Neurooncologie, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Corniola MV, Meling TR. Management of Recurrent Meningiomas: State of the Art and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163995. [PMID: 36010988 PMCID: PMC9406695 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Intracranial meningiomas account for 30% to 40% of the primary lesions of the central nervous system. Surgery is the mainstay treatment whenever symptoms related to an intra-cranial meningioma are encountered. However, the management of recurrences after initial surgery, which are not uncommon, is still a matter of debate. Here, we present the alternatives described in the management of meningioma recurrence (radiotherapy, stereotaxic radiosurgery, protontherapy, and chemotherapy, among others). Their overall results are compared to surgery and future perspectives are presented. Abstract Background: While meningiomas often recur over time, the natural history of repeated recurrences and their management are not well described. Should recurrence occur, repeat surgery and/or use of adjuvant therapeutic options may be necessary. Here, we summarize current practice when it comes to meningioma recurrence after initial surgical management. Methods: A total of N = 89 articles were screened. N = 41 articles met the inclusion criteria and N = 16 articles failed to assess management of meningioma recurrence. Finally, N = 24 articles were included in our review. Results: The articles were distributed as follows: studies on chemotherapy (N = 14), radiotherapy, protontherapy, and stereotaxic radiosurgery (N = 6), boron-neutron capture therapy (N = 2) and surgery (N = 3). No study seems to provide serious alternatives to surgery in terms of progression-free and overall survival. Recurrence can occur long after the initial surgery and also affects WHO grade 1 meningiomas, even after initial gross total resection at first surgery, emphasizing the need for a long-term and comprehensive follow-up. Conclusions: Surgery still seems to be the state-of-the-art management when it comes to meningioma recurrence, since none of the non-surgical alternatives show promising results in terms of progression-free and overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Vincenzo Corniola
- Service de Neurochirurgie, Pôle des Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, 35000 Rennes, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Genève, 1205 Geneve, Switzerland
- Laboratoire du Traitement de Signal, Unité Médicis, INSERM UMR 1099 LTSI, Université de Rennes 1, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Torstein R. Meling
- Faculté de Médecine, Université de Genève, 1205 Geneve, Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
- Besta NeuroSim Center, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Neurologico Carlo Basta, 20133 Milano, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
68Ga-DOTATATE PET: The Future of Meningioma Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:868-871. [PMID: 35772444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
15
|
Somatostatin Receptor Targeted PET-Imaging for Diagnosis, Radiotherapy Planning and Theranostics of Meningiomas: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071666. [PMID: 35885570 PMCID: PMC9321668 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of the present systematic review are to: (1) assess the diagnostic performance of somatostatin receptor (SSR)targeted positron emission tomography (PET) with different tracers and devices in patients affected by meningiomas; and (2) to evaluate the theranostic applications of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in meningiomas. A systematic literature search according to PRISMA criteria was made by using two main databases. Only studies published from 2011 up to March 2022 in the English language with ≥10 enrolled patients were selected. Following our research strategy, 17 studies were included for the assessment. Fourteen studies encompassed 534 patients, harboring 733 meningiomas, submitted to SSR-targeted PET/CT (n = 10) or PET/MRI (n = 4) for de novo diagnosis, recurrence detection, or radiation therapy (RT) planning (endpoint 1), while 3 studies included 69 patients with therapy-refractory meningiomas submitted to PRRT (endpoint 2). A relevant variation in methodology was registered among diagnostic studies, since only a minority of them reported histopathology as a reference standard. PET, especially when performed through PET/MRI, resulted particularly useful for the detection of meningiomas located in the skull base (SB) or next to the falx cerebri, significantly influencing RT planning. As far as it concerns PRRT studies, stable disease was obtained in the 66.6% of the treated patients, being grade 1–2 hematological toxicity the most common side effect. Of note, the wide range of the administered activities, the various utilized radiopharmaceuticals (90Y-DOTATOC and/or 177Lu-DOTATATE), the lack of dosimetric studies hamper a clear definition of PRRT potential on meningiomas’ management.
Collapse
|
16
|
Piper K, Yu S, Taghvaei M, Fernandez C, Mouchtouris N, Smit RD, Yudkoff C, Collopy S, Reyes M, Lavergne P, Karsy M, Prashant GN, Shi W, Evans J. Radiation of meningioma dural tail may not improve tumor control rates. Front Surg 2022; 9:908745. [PMID: 35860199 PMCID: PMC9289604 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.908745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Dural tails are thickened contrast-enhancing portions of dura associated with some meningiomas. Prior studies have demonstrated the presence of tumor cells within the dural tail, however their inclusion in radiation treatment fields remains controversial. We evaluated the role of including the dural tail when treating a meningioma with stereotactic radiation and the impact on tumor recurrence. Methods This is a retrospective, single-institution, cohort study of patients with intracranial World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 meningioma and identified dural tail who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) from January 2012 to December 2018. SRS and FSRT subgroups were categorized based on coverage or non-coverage of the dural tail by the radiation fields, as determined independently by a radiation oncologist and a neurosurgeon. Demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation plans, and outcomes were evaluated. High grade tumors were analyzed separately. Results A total of 187 WHO grade 1 tumors from 177 patients were included in the study (median age: 62 years, median follow-up: 40 months, 78.1% female) with 104 receiving SRS and 83 receiving FSRT. The dural tail was covered in 141 (75.4%) of treatment plans. There was no difference in recurrence rates (RR) or time to recurrence (TTR) between non-coverage or coverage of dural tails (RR: 2.2% vs 3.5%, P = 1.0; TTR: 34 vs 36 months, P = 1.00). There was no difference in the rate of radiation side effects between dural tail coverage or non-coverage groups. These associations remained stable when SRS and FSRT subgroups were considered separately, as well as in a high grade cohort of 16 tumors. Conclusion Inclusion of the dural tail in the SRS or FSRT volumes for meningioma treatment does not seem to reduce recurrence rate. Improved understanding of dural tail pathophysiology, tumor grade, tumor spread, and radiation response is needed to better predict the response of meningiomas to radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keenan Piper
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Correspondence: Keenan Piper
| | - Siyuan Yu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mohammad Taghvaei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Christian Fernandez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Nikolaos Mouchtouris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rupert D. Smit
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Clifford Yudkoff
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sarah Collopy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Maikerly Reyes
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Pascal Lavergne
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Giyarpuram N. Prashant
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - James Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
The Role of [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET Radiotracers in Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Ongoing Clinical Trials. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122925. [PMID: 35740591 PMCID: PMC9221214 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging has recently been introduced in the management of patients with brain tumors, mostly meningiomas and pituitary adenomas or carcinomas. The current literature demonstrated the superior diagnostic accuracy of this imaging modality, especially for lesions difficult to be detected or characterized on conventional imaging protocols, such as skull base or transosseous meningiomas. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers also seem to provide superior volume contouring for radiotherapy planning and may also be used to evaluate the tumor’s overexpression of somatostatin receptors for devising patient-tailored peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this review, we comprehensively analyzed the current literature discussing the implementation of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET imaging in brain tumors, further presenting ongoing clinical trials and suggesting potential future applications. Abstract Background: The development of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET tracers has garnered interest in neuro-oncology, to increase accuracy in diagnostic, radiation planning, and neurotheranostics protocols. We systematically reviewed the literature on the current uses of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in brain tumors. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to include published studies and ongoing trials utilizing [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET in patients with brain tumors. Results: We included 63 published studies comprising 1030 patients with 1277 lesions, and 4 ongoing trials. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET was mostly used for diagnostic purposes (62.5%), followed by treatment planning (32.7%), and neurotheranostics (4.8%). Most lesions were meningiomas (93.6%), followed by pituitary adenomas (2.8%), and the DOTATOC tracer (53.2%) was used more frequently than DOTATATE (39.1%) and DOTANOC (5.7%), except for diagnostic purposes (DOTATATE 51.1%). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies were mostly required to confirm the diagnosis of meningiomas (owing to their high SSTR2 expression and tracer uptake) or evaluate their extent of bone invasion, and improve volume contouring for better radiotherapy planning. Some studies reported the uncommon occurrence of SSTR2-positive brain pathology challenging the diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET for meningiomas. Pre-treatment assessment of tracer uptake rates has been used to confirm patient eligibility (high somatostatin receptor-2 expression) for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) (i.e., neurotheranostics) for recurrent meningiomas and pituitary carcinomas. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSTR PET studies may revolutionize the routine neuro-oncology practice, especially in meningiomas, by improving diagnostic accuracy, delineation of radiotherapy targets, and patient eligibility for radionuclide therapies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Galldiks N, Langen KJ, Albert NL, Law I, Kim MM, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Soffietti R, Wen PY, Weller M, Tonn JC. Investigational PET tracers in neuro-oncology-What's on the horizon? A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1815-1826. [PMID: 35674736 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Many studies in patients with brain tumors evaluating innovative PET tracers have been published in recent years, and the initial results are promising. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) PET working group provides an overview of the literature on novel investigational PET tracers for brain tumor patients. Furthermore, newer indications of more established PET tracers for the evaluation of glucose metabolism, amino acid transport, hypoxia, cell proliferation, and others are also discussed. Based on the preliminary findings, these novel investigational PET tracers should be further evaluated considering their promising potential. In particular, novel PET probes for imaging of translocator protein and somatostatin receptor overexpression as well as for immune system reactions appear to be of additional clinical value for tumor delineation and therapy monitoring. Progress in developing these radiotracers may contribute to improving brain tumor diagnostics and advancing clinical translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Javier E Villanueva-Meyer
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jiang C, Bhattacharya A, Linzey JR, Joshi RS, Cha SJ, Srinivasan S, Alber D, Kondepudi A, Urias E, Pandian B, Al-Holou WN, Sullivan SE, Thompson BG, Heth JA, Freudiger CW, Khalsa SSS, Pacione DR, Golfinos JG, Camelo-Piragua S, Orringer DA, Lee H, Hollon TC. Rapid Automated Analysis of Skull Base Tumor Specimens Using Intraoperative Optical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence. Neurosurgery 2022; 90:758-767. [PMID: 35343469 PMCID: PMC9514725 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate specimen analysis of skull base tumors is essential for providing personalized surgical treatment strategies. Intraoperative specimen interpretation can be challenging because of the wide range of skull base pathologies and lack of intraoperative pathology resources. OBJECTIVE To develop an independent and parallel intraoperative workflow that can provide rapid and accurate skull base tumor specimen analysis using label-free optical imaging and artificial intelligence. METHODS We used a fiber laser-based, label-free, nonconsumptive, high-resolution microscopy method (<60 seconds per 1 × 1 mm2), called stimulated Raman histology (SRH), to image a consecutive, multicenter cohort of patients with skull base tumor. SRH images were then used to train a convolutional neural network model using 3 representation learning strategies: cross-entropy, self-supervised contrastive learning, and supervised contrastive learning. Our trained convolutional neural network models were tested on a held-out, multicenter SRH data set. RESULTS SRH was able to image the diagnostic features of both benign and malignant skull base tumors. Of the 3 representation learning strategies, supervised contrastive learning most effectively learned the distinctive and diagnostic SRH image features for each of the skull base tumor types. In our multicenter testing set, cross-entropy achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91.5%, self-supervised contrastive learning 83.9%, and supervised contrastive learning 96.6%. Our trained model was able to segment tumor-normal margins and detect regions of microscopic tumor infiltration in meningioma SRH images. CONCLUSION SRH with trained artificial intelligence models can provide rapid and accurate intraoperative analysis of skull base tumor specimens to inform surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Jiang
- Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Joseph R. Linzey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Rushikesh S. Joshi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sung Jik Cha
- School of Medicine, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Daniel Alber
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Akhil Kondepudi
- College of Literature, Science and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Esteban Urias
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Balaji Pandian
- School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Wajd N. Al-Holou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stephen E. Sullivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - B. Gregory Thompson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jason A. Heth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Donato R. Pacione
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - John G. Golfinos
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Daniel A. Orringer
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Honglak Lee
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Todd C. Hollon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Extent of Resection Research in Skull Base Neurosurgery: Previous Studies and Future Directions. World Neurosurg 2022; 161:396-404. [PMID: 35505559 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.10.184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Surgery is the first-line therapy for most benign and malignant skull base tumors. Extent of resection (EOR) is a metric commonly used for preoperative surgical planning and to predict risk of postoperative tumor recurrence. Therefore, understanding the evidence on EOR in skull base neurosurgery is essential to providing optimal care for each patient. Several studies from the skull base neurosurgery literature have presented investigations of various topics related to EOR, including 1) preoperative EOR scoring systems, 2) intraoperative EOR scoring systems, 3) EOR and tumor recurrence, and 4) EOR and functional outcomes. We propose that future investigations should focus on the following elements to improve EOR research in skull base neurosurgery: 1) multi-institutional collaboratives with treatment propensity matching; 2) expert consensus and mixed-methods study design; and 3) predictive analytics/machine learning. We believe that these methods offer several advantages that have been described in the literature and that they address limitations of previous studies. The aim of this review was to inform future study design and improve the overall quality of subsequent investigations on EOR in skull base neurosurgery.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ivanidze J, Roytman M, Skafida M, Kim S, Glynn S, Osborne JR, Pannullo SC, Nehmeh S, Ramakrishna R, Schwartz TH, Knisely JPS, Lin E, Karakatsanis NA. Dynamic 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI in the Diagnosis and Management of Intracranial Meningiomas. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2022; 4:e210067. [PMID: 35275019 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.210067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate dynamic gallium 68 (68Ga) tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (DOTATATE) brain PET/MRI as an adjunct modality in meningioma, enabling multiparametric standardized uptake value (SUV) and Patlak net binding rate constant (Ki) imaging, and to optimize static acquisition period. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT04081701, DOMINO-START), 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI-derived time-activity curves (TACs) were measured in 84 volumes of interest in 19 participants (mean age, 63 years; range, 36-89 years; 13 women; 2019-2021) with meningiomas. Region- and voxel-specific Ki were determined using Patlak analysis with a validated population-based reference tissue TAC model built from an independent data set of nine participants. Mean and maximum absolute and relative-to-superior-sagittal-sinus SUVs were extracted from the entire 50 minutes (SUV50) and last 10 minutes (SUV10) of acquisition. SUV versus Ki Spearman correlation, SUV and Ki meningioma versus posttreatment-change Mann-Whitney U tests, and SUV50 versus SUV10 Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were performed. Results Absolute and relative maximum SUV50 demonstrated a strong positive correlation with Patlak Ki in meningioma (r = 0.82, P < .001 and r = 0.85, P < .001, respectively) and posttreatment-change lesions (r = 0.88, P = .007 and r = 0.83, P = .02, respectively). Patlak Ki images yielded higher lesion contrast by mitigating nonspecific background signal. All SUV50 and SUV10 metrics differed between meningioma and posttreatment-change regions (P < .001). Within the meningioma group, SUV10 attained higher mean scores than SUV50 (P < .001). Conclusion Combined SUV and Patlak K i 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MRI enabled multiparametric evaluation of meningioma, offering the potential to enhance lesion contrast with Ki imaging and optimize the SUV measurement postinjection window. Keywords: Molecular Imaging-Clinical Translation, Neuro-Oncology, PET/MRI, Dynamic, Patlak ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT04081701 © RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Ivanidze
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Michelle Roytman
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Myrto Skafida
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Sean Kim
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Shannon Glynn
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Sadek Nehmeh
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Rohan Ramakrishna
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Theodore H Schwartz
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Jonathan P S Knisely
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Eaton Lin
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| | - Nicolas A Karakatsanis
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.I., M.R., M.S., J.R.O., S.N., E.L., N.A.K.), Neurologic Surgery (S.C.P., R.R., T.H.S.), and Radiation Oncology (J.P.S.K.), NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, 515 E 71st St, S-120, New York, NY 10021; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (S.K., S.G.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (S.C.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Galldiks N, Angenstein F, Werner JM, Bauer EK, Gutsche R, Fink GR, Langen KJ, Lohmann P. Use of advanced neuroimaging and artificial intelligence in meningiomas. Brain Pathol 2022; 32:e13015. [PMID: 35213083 PMCID: PMC8877736 DOI: 10.1111/bpa.13015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Anatomical cross‐sectional imaging methods such as contrast‐enhanced MRI and CT are the standard for the delineation, treatment planning, and follow‐up of patients with meningioma. Besides, advanced neuroimaging is increasingly used to non‐invasively provide detailed insights into the molecular and metabolic features of meningiomas. These techniques are usually based on MRI, e.g., perfusion‐weighted imaging, diffusion‐weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy, and positron emission tomography. Furthermore, artificial intelligence methods such as radiomics offer the potential to extract quantitative imaging features from routinely acquired anatomical MRI and CT scans and advanced imaging techniques. This allows the linking of imaging phenotypes to meningioma characteristics, e.g., the molecular‐genetic profile. Here, we review several diagnostic applications and future directions of these advanced neuroimaging techniques, including radiomics in preclinical models and patients with meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Cologne, Germany
| | - Frank Angenstein
- Functional Neuroimaging Group, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.,Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena K Bauer
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Robin Gutsche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carneiro V, Cirino M, Panepucci R, Peria F, Tirapelli D, Colli B, Carlotti CG. The Role of MicroRNA 181d as a Possible Biomarker Associated With Tumor Progression in Meningiomas. Cureus 2021; 13:e19158. [PMID: 34873501 PMCID: PMC8631491 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Meningiomas are slow-growing intracranial neoplasms that originate from arachnoid meningothelial cells and represent 13-26% of intracranial tumors, thus being the most common. There are numerous technological advances available for a better understanding of the molecular pathways correlated with tumorigenesis and tumor progression of meningiomas. In this context, the role of microRNAs (miRNAs), which are non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) consisting of 18 to 25 nucleotides whose function is the silencing of mRNA at the posttranscriptional level, has been highlighted. Recent studies suggest that miRNAs may act as possible biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets for various diseases, including brain tumors. Therefore, the objective of our study was to evaluate the tissue and plasma expression of the miRNAs miR-181d, miR-181c, and miR-130a. Methods The miRNAs miR-181d, miR-181c, and miR-130a were selected from our group’s prior study by the large-scale microarray analysis technique. In this work, the expression of these miRNAs in the tumor tissue and plasma of patients with grade I (16 patients), II (16 patients), and III (eight patients) meningiomas was evaluated. Results MiR-181d was overexpressed in both tumor tissue and plasma in the studied groups. The level of expression was higher according to the progression of tumor grade. MiR-181c and miR-130a showed no significant difference in the studied groups in either tumor tissue or plasma. Conclusions MiR-181d has potential as a biomarker for meningiomas and is associated with the tumor progression of meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinícius Carneiro
- Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Múcio Cirino
- Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Rodrigo Panepucci
- Hemocenter, Laboratory of Functional Biology (LFBio) Center for Cell-Based (CTC, Regional Blood Center of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Fernanda Peria
- Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Daniela Tirapelli
- Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Benedicto Colli
- Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| | - Carlos Gilberto Carlotti
- Surgery and Anatomy, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Ribeirão Preto, BRA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Biczok A, Karschnia P, Vitalini R, Lenski M, Greve T, Thorsteinsdottir J, Egensperger R, Dorn F, Tonn JC, Schichor C. Past medical history of tumors other than meningioma is a negative prognostic factor for tumor recurrence in meningiomas WHO grade I. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:2853-2859. [PMID: 33674888 PMCID: PMC8437882 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04780-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Prognostic markers for meningioma recurrence are needed to guide patient management. Apart from rare hereditary syndromes, the impact of a previous unrelated tumor disease on meningioma recurrence has not been described before. Methods We retrospectively searched our database for patients with meningioma WHO grade I and complete resection provided between 2002 and 2016. Demographical, clinical, pathological, and outcome data were recorded. The following covariates were included in the statistical model: age, sex, clinical history of unrelated tumor disease, and localization (skull base vs. convexity). Particular interest was paid to the patients’ past medical history. The study endpoint was date of tumor recurrence on imaging. Prognostic factors were obtained from multivariate proportional hazards models. Results Out of 976 meningioma patients diagnosed with a meningioma WHO grade I, 416 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We encountered 305 women and 111 men with a median age of 57 years (range: 21–89 years). Forty-six patients suffered from a tumor other than meningioma, and no TERT mutation was detected in these patients. There were no differences between patients with and without a positive oncological history in terms of age, tumor localization, or mitotic cell count. Clinical history of prior tumors other than meningioma showed the strongest association with meningioma recurrence (p = 0.004, HR = 3.113, CI = 1.431–6.771) both on uni- and multivariate analysis. Conclusion Past medical history of tumors other than meningioma might be associated with an increased risk of meningioma recurrence. A detailed pre-surgical history might help to identify patients at risk for early recurrence.
Collapse
|
25
|
Unterrainer M, Lindner S, Beyer L, Gildehaus FJ, Todica A, Mittlmeier LM, Jurkschat K, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Tonn JC, Albert NL, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H. PET Imaging of Meningioma Using the Novel SSTR-Targeting Peptide 18F-SiTATE. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:667-668. [PMID: 33782306 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT PET using 68Ga-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands adds significant information in meningioma patients. 18F-SiTATE is a novel, 18F-labeled SSTR-targeting peptide with remarkable imaging properties. Here, we present a 72-year-old woman with falx meningioma and transosseous extension. 18F-SiTATE PET/CT was performed 12 months after the previous 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT with comparable quantitative uptake and very good spatial resolution. So far, the widespread use of SSTR ligands for NET and meningioma imaging is hampered by cost-intensive 68Ge/68Ga generators, low activity amounts, lower spatial resolution, and short half-life. 18F-SiTATE might foster widespread use of SSTR ligands, overcoming the shortcomings of 68Ga-labeled ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Klaus Jurkschat
- Fakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität, Dortmund
| | | | - Bjoern Wängler
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Schirrmacher
- Division of Oncological Imaging, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gillespie CS, Taweel BA, Richardson GE, Mustafa MA, Keshwara SM, Babar RK, Alnaham KE, Kumar S, Bakhsh A, Millward CP, Islim AI, Brodbelt AR, Mills SJ, Jenkinson MD. Volumetric growth of residual meningioma - A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 91:110-117. [PMID: 34373014 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection of meningioma leaves residual solid tumour in over 25% of patients. Selection for further treatment and follow-up strategy may benefit from knowledge of volumetric growth and factors associated with re-growth. The aim of this review was to evaluate volumetric growth and variables associated with growth in patients that underwent incomplete resection of a meningioma without the use of adjuvant radiotherapy. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement and registered a priori with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020177052). Six databases were searched up to May 2020. Full text articles analysing volumetric growth rates in at least 10 patients who had residual meningioma after surgery were assessed. Four single-centre, retrospective studies totalling 238 patients were included, of which 99% of meningioma were WHO grade 1. The absolute tumour growth rate ranged from 0.09 to 4.94 cm3 per year. The relative growth rate ranged from 5.11 to 14.18% per year. Varying methods of volumetric assessment and definitions of growth impeded pooled analysis. Pre-operative and residual tumour volume, and hyperintensity on T2 weighted MRI were identified as variables associated with residual meningioma growth, however this was inconsistent across studies. Risk of bias was high in all studies. Radiological regrowth occurred in 42-67% of cases. Our review identified that volumetric growth of residual meningioma is scarcely reported. Sufficiently powered studies are required to delineate volumetric growth and prognostic factors to stratify management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor S Gillespie
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Basel A Taweel
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - George E Richardson
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mohammad A Mustafa
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sumirat M Keshwara
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roshan K Babar
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Siddhant Kumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ali Bakhsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; School of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher P Millward
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Abdurrahman I Islim
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew R Brodbelt
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Samantha J Mills
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bashir A, Larsen VA, Ziebell M, Fugleholm K, Law I. Improved Detection of Postoperative Residual Meningioma with [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET Imaging Using a High-resolution Research Tomograph PET Scanner. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2216-2225. [PMID: 33526423 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE PET with somatostatin receptor ligand [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC) is an established method in radiotherapy planning because of the improved detection and delineation of meningioma tissue. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of supplementary [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET in patients with a 3-month postoperative MRI reporting gross-total resection (GTR). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Thirty-seven patients with a histologically proven meningioma and GTR on postoperative MRI were prospectively referred to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET. Detection and volume measurements of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC-avid lesions in relation to the primary tumor site were recorded. Residual tumor in suspicious lesions suggested by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET was verified by (i) tumor recurrence/progression on subsequent MRI scans according to the Response Assessment of Neuro-Oncology criteria, (ii) subsequent histology, and (iii) follow-up [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET scan. RESULTS Twenty-three PET scans demonstrated [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC-avid lesions suspicious of residual meningioma, where 18 could be verified by (i) tumor progression on subsequent MRI scans (n = 6), (ii) histologic confirmation (n = 3), and (iii) follow-up [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET scans confirming the initial PET findings (n = 9) after an overall median follow-up time of 17 months (range, 9-35 months). In contrast, disease recurrence was seen in only 2 of 14 patients without [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC-avid lesions (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET in detecting meningioma residue was 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 67-99], 92% (95% CI, 62-100), and 90% (95% CI, 74-98; P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with GTR on 3-month postoperative MRI may have small unrecognized meningioma residues that can be detected using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Bashir
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
| | - Vibeke A Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Morten Ziebell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Kåre Fugleholm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hadi I, Biczok A, Terpolilli N, Thorsteinsdottir J, Forbrig R, Albert NL, Yanchovski P, Zollner B, Bodensohn R, Corradini S, Bartenstein P, Belka C, Tonn JC, Schichor C, Niyazi M. Multimodal therapy of cavernous sinus meningioma: Impact of surgery and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-guided radiation therapy on tumor control and functional outcome. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab114. [PMID: 34704034 PMCID: PMC8541706 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional preservation in patients with WHO grade I meningioma involving the cavernous sinus (CSM) is crucial for long-term tumor control. Concise data on the functional outcome of an interdisciplinary, multimodal treatment are scarce. We analyzed functional outcome and tumor control in CSM patients following maximal safe resection (MSR), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), or combination of them, retrospectively. METHODS Patients with WHO grade I CSM treated between 2003 and 2017 were included. Prior to FSRT, a 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed for radiation planning. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was performed to test differences between groups. Visual function was analyzed at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS Eighty-five patients were included. MSR alone was performed in 48 patients (group A), MSR followed by FSRT in 25 patients (group B), and FSRT alone in 12 patients (group C). Intracranial tumor volumes were higher in A and B compared to C (median 9.2/10.8/4.3 ccm for A/B/C, P = .023). Median follow-up was 47/46/45 months and PFS at 5 years 55.7%, 100%, and 100% in A/B/C, respectively (P < .001). Optic nerve compression was more common in A (91.7%) and B (84.0%) than C (16.7%), P < .001. Post-therapeutic new onset or deterioration of double vision was observed in 29% (A), 17% (B), and 0% (C). CONCLUSION Personalized treatment strategies for CSM are essential to control space-occupying or functionally compromising lesions. The additional potential side effect of radiotherapy seems to be justified under the aspect of longer tumor control with low functional risk. Without space-occupying effect of CSM, FSRT alone is reasonably possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indrawati Hadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annamaria Biczok
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicole Terpolilli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Robert Forbrig
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Petar Yanchovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Zollner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|