Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas

Factors Associated with Extended Hospitalization in Patients Who Had Adjuvant Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization After Conventional Surgery for Chronic Subdural Hematomas

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the length of stay (LOS) in patients who had adjunct middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma after conventional surgery and determine the factors influencing the LOS in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 107 cases with MMAE after conventional surgery between September 2018 and January 2024 was performed. Factors associated with prolonged LOS were identified through univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

The median LOS for MMAE after conventional surgery was 9 days (interquartile range = 6-17), with a 3-day interval between procedures (interquartile range = 2-5). Among 107 patients, 58 stayed ≤ 9 days, while 49 stayed longer. Univariable analysis showed the interval between procedures, type of surgery, MMAE sedation, and the number of complications associated with prolonged LOS. Multivariable analysis confirmed longer intervals between procedures (odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; P < 0.01), ≥2 medical complications (OR = 13.34; P = 0.01), and neurological complications (OR = 5.28; P = 0.05) were independent factors for lengthier hospitalizations. There was a trending association between general anesthesia during MMAE and prolonged LOS (P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis revealed diabetes (OR = 5.25; P = 0.01) and ≥2 medical complications (OR = 5.21; P = 0.03) correlated with a LOS over 20 days, the 75th percentile in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The interval between procedures and the number of medical and neurological complications were strongly associated with prolonged LOS in patients who had adjunct MMAE after open surgery. Reducing the interval between the procedures and potentially performing both under 1 anesthetic may decrease the burden on patients and shorten their hospitalizations.

Chronic subdural hematoma: What precisely are we treating?

Subdural hematoma (SDH) refers to the collection of blood between the dura matter and the arachnoid membrane. Advancements in imaging technology have enabled the categorization of SDH based on specific imaging characteristics, causative factors, and the onset of symptoms. Given that the prognosis of SDHs varies significantly and is contingent upon the size and chronicity of the hemorrhage, a comprehensive understanding of its subtypes may carry crucial treatment implications. For example, an acute SDH classically results from severe traumatic brain injury and appears as a homogenous, crescent-shaped hyperdense extra-axial collection. If not treated, over the course of 1-3 weeks, this hematoma will evolve into a sub-acute phenotype as a consequence of subdural effusion and demonstrate mixed-density hemorrhage on imaging. Chronic SDH (cSDH) becomes the end result of an untreated SDH, with neo-membranization and neo-angiogenesis from branches of the middle meningeal artery driving a mass-like growth pattern. This review article aims to elucidate the complex anatomical features of the end-stage cSDH, with a particular focus on reconceptualization of this entity based on its mass-like growth patterns, and how this is driving a shift towards endovascular treatment.

Femoral versus radial access for middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas: multicenter propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

With transradial access (TRA) being more progressively used in neuroendovascular procedures, we compared TRA with transfemoral access (TFA) in middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing MMAE for cSDH at 14 North American centers (2018-23) were included. TRA and TFA groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for: age, sex, concurrent surgery, previous surgery, hematoma thickness and side, midline shift, and pretreatment antithrombotics. The primary outcome was access site and overall complications, and procedure duration; secondary endpoints were surgical rescue, radiographic improvement, and technical success and length of stay.

RESULTS

872 patients (median age 73 years, 72.9% men) underwent 1070 MMAE procedures (54% TFA vs 46% TRA). Access site hematoma occurred in three TFA cases (0.5%; none required operative intervention) versus 0% in TRA (P=0.23), and radial-to-femoral conversion occurred in 1% of TRA cases. TRA was more used in right sided cSDH (58.4% vs 44.8%; P<0.001). Particle embolics were significantly higher in TFA while Onyx was higher in TRA (P<0.001). Following PSM, 150 matched pairs were generated. Particles were more utilized in the TFA group (53% vs 29.7%) and Onyx was more utilized in the TRA group (56.1% vs 31.5%) (P=0.001). Procedural duration was longer in the TRA group (median 68.5 min (IQR 43.1-95) vs 59 (42-84); P=0.038), and radiographic success was higher in the TFA group (87.3% vs 77.4%; P=0.036). No differences were noted in surgical rescue (8.4% vs 10.1%, P=0.35) or technical failures (2.4% vs 2%; P=0.67) between TFA and TRA. Sensitivity analysis in the standalone MMAE retained all associations but differences in procedural duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, TRA offered comparable outcomes to TFA in MMAE for cSDH in terms of access related and overall complications, technical feasibility, and functional outcomes. Procedural duration was slightly longer in the TRA group, and radiographic success was higher in the TFA group, with no differences in surgical rescue rates.

Comparison of Postoperative Seizures Between Burr-Hole Evacuation and Craniotomy in Patients With Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A Bi-Institutional Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative seizures are a common complication after surgical drainage of nonacute chronic subdural hematomas (SDHs). The literature increasingly supports the use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs for craniotomy, a procedure that is often associated with larger collections and worse clinical status at admission. This study aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative seizures in patients treated with burr-hole drainage and those treated with craniotomy through propensity score matching (PSM).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients with surgical drainage of nonacute SDHs (burr-holes and craniotomies) between January 2017 to December 2021 at 2 academic institutions in the United States. PSM was performed by controlling for age, subdural thickness, subacute component, and preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale. Seizure rates and accompanying abnormalities on electroencephalographic tracing were evaluated postmatching.

RESULTS

A total of 467 patients with 510 nonacute SDHs underwent 474 procedures, with 242 burr-hole evacuations (51.0%) and 232 craniotomies (49.0%). PSM resulted in 62 matched pairs. After matching, univariate analysis revealed that burr-hole evacuations exhibited lower rates of seizures (1.6% vs 11.3%; P = .03) and abnormal electroencephalographic findings (0.0% vs 4.8%; P = .03) compared with craniotomies. No significant differences were observed in postoperative Glasgow Coma Scale (P = .77) and length of hospital stay (P = .61).

CONCLUSION

Burr-hole evacuation demonstrated significantly lower seizure rates than craniotomy using a propensity score-matched analysis controlling for significant variables.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Case Series Featuring Access Through a Carotid Stent

The first objective of this case series was to describe the case of a patient with severe symptomatic left internal carotid artery stenosis after a recent stroke. Several days after stent placement by transcarotid artery revascularization, the patient developed a left-sided subdural hematoma. The patient then underwent embolization of the left middle meningeal artery (MMA) despite blocked access to the left MMA because of an internal carotid stent. The external carotid artery was accessed by passing a guiding catheter through the stent wall. We describe this method as "intrawall access." This allowed a coaxial system to deliver polyvinyl alcohol particles to the MMA for embolization. Embolization was successfully performed, with the stent integrity and blood flow through it remaining uncompromised. Overall, we demonstrated a new method of access through a previously placed internal carotid stent to gain neurointerventional access to the external carotid artery, which was jailed by a stent, for treating an acute subdural hematoma via MMA embolization. The second objective of this case series was to demonstrate the first MMA embolization in literature carried out in the acute or acute-on-subacute setting, in this case, and in four others.

Embolization of Middle Meningeal Arteries for Symptomatic Subacute Subdural Hematoma in Patients with Cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical success of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization performed for symptomatic subacute subdural hematoma (SDH) in patients with cancer.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 23 consecutive patients (12 men, 11 women; median age 61 years, interquartile range: 55.5-75.5) who underwent 34 MMA angiograms for symptomatic SDH in 2022 and 2023. Median SDH thickness was 10.5 mm (7-12). Median platelet count was 117 K/mcL (54.5-218). 10 patients (43.5%, 10/23) had hematologic malignancies, seven patients (30.4%, 7/23) had surgery. Fluoroscopy time (FT), reference dose (RD), and kerma area product (Kap) were analyzed. Adverse events and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The median imaging and clinical follow-up were 65 days (36.5-190.5) and 163 days (86-274), respectively. The technical success rate was 91.2% (31/34) as three MMA were not identified in two patients. Median procedure duration was 61 min (55.5-75.5). Median FT was 21.6 min (15.5-31.8); median RD was 158 mGy (96-256); and median Kap was 32.9 Gy.cm2 (20.4-45.1). No further intervention was needed. For 16 patients, SDH resolved after in median 59.5 days (50-90). For seven patients, SDH remained visible on the last imaging follow-up performed at 24 days in median (6.5-36.5). No predictive factor of failure was identified. The adverse event rate was 1/23 (4.3%). Eight patients (34.8%, 8/23) died during follow-up from progression of cancer.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization of symptomatic SDH in patients with cancer appears safe and is associated with improvement in clinical symptoms.

Safety and efficacy comparison of embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization in terms of both clinical and radiographic outcomes, when performed with different embolic agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of embolic agents on outcomes for middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. The use of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with or without (±) coils, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) ± coils, and Onyx alone were separately evaluated. Primary outcome measures were recurrence, the need for surgical rescue and in-hospital periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified with a total of 1,134 patients, with 786 receiving PVA, 167 receiving n-BCA, and 181 patients receiving Onyx. There was no difference in the recurrence rate (5.5% for PVA, 4.5% for n-BCA, and 6.5% for Onyx, with P=0.71) or need for surgical rescue (5.0% for PVA, 4.0% for n-BCA, and 6.9% for Onyx, with P=0.89) based on the embolic agent. Procedural complications also did not differ between embolic agents (1.8% for PVA, 3.6% for n-BCA, and 1.6% for Onyx, with P=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of recurrence, need for surgical rescue, and periprocedural complication following MMA embolization are not impacted by the type of embolic agent utilized. Ongoing clinical trials may be used to further investigate these findings.

Simple coiling of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has gained much attention in recent years. However, unintended embolization may occur when employing liquid embolic agents or particles. We present our clinical experience in simple coiling of MMAE to manage CSDH.

METHODS

Patients underwent either surgical evacuation or MMAE with simple coiling for CSDH were reviewed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at admission, 1-month, and 6-month intervals. Two treatment groups were matched with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were included, with 27 patients in MMAE group and 87 patients in surgery group. In MMAE group, significant reductions were observed in hematoma width (admission vs. 1-month, 2.04 [1.44-2.60] cm vs. 0.62 [0.37-0.95] cm, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of surgical rescue rate (0.77 95%CI 0.13-4.47, p = 0.77), hematoma reduction (>50%) (0.21 95%CI 0.04-1.07, p = 0.06), and midline shift improvement rate (3.22, 95%CI 0.84-12.4, p = 0.09) had no substantial disparities between two groups at 1-month follow-up. In addition, no significant difference was noted between two groups in terms of hematoma reduction (>50%) at 6-month follow-up (aOR 1.09 95%CI 0.32-3.70, p = 0.89). No procedure-related complications were found in MMA embolization group.

CONCLUSION

Simple coiling for MMA had comparable outcomes with surgical evacuation for CSDH. Our findings suggest that simple coiling can be an alternative choice for liquid agents or particles in MMA embolization for CSDH with acceptable safety.

Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension and Subdural Hematomas Treatment Management Using MMA Embolization and Target Blood Patch: A Case Report

We report a patient suffering from spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) who, following a non-selective lumbar blood patch, returned to his healthcare provider with severe symptoms of neurological deficits. It was subsequently discovered that the aforementioned deficits were due to a bilateral subdural hematoma, and an emergency surgical drainage of the hematoma has been performed. However, the hematoma reformed and potential cerebrospinal fluid leakage was consequently investigated through myelography. Following the diagnostic finding of a venous diverticulum, a selective blood patch was executed in the affected area, and in order to stabilize the hematoma, an embolization of the middle meningeal arteries was performed. The combination of such operations allowed for the resorption of the hematoma and the improvement of neurological symptoms.

Particle embolic agents for embolization of middle meningeal artery in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) using particle embolic agents to treat cSDH.

METHODS

To retrieve articles investigating outcomes of patients following MMAE with particle agents and to compare their outcome with conventional treatment, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using relevant keywords. Original articles with more than 10 cases were included. The meta-analysis was carried out using the R studio and the random-effects model. Publication bias was assessed using Peter's test and quality assessment using NIH tools.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with 359 patients were included. The analysis revealed a pooled recurrence rate of 5% (CI: 3-8%), a need for reoperation rate of 5% (3-9%), and a peri-procedural complication rate of 4% (CI:2-9%) following MMAE with particle embolic agents. The pooled rates of decrease in size or resolution of the hematoma were 85% (CI:66-94%) and 66% (39-86%), respectively. Comparing MMAE using particulate embolysate with conventional treatments, risk ratio (RR) of 0.10 (CI:0.04-0.27) was achieved for recurrence, 0.25(CI:0.13-0.49) for reoperation, and 0.34 (CI:0.16-0.27) for peri-procedural complications. 91% of cSDH cases responded to MMAE with particles in the way they showed either down-sizing or complete resolution of the hematoma on follow-up imaging. In comparison, this rate was found to be 63% following conventional treatment.

CONCLUSION

Middle meningeal artery embolization using particle embolysates is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of cSDH, whether as a standalone intervention or in combination with conventional treatments.

Correlation Between Low-Density Hematoma at 1-Week Post-Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization and Rapid Resolution of Chronic Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

Temporal changes in the volume of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) following middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization vary. We aimed to determine whether CSDH density on computed tomography is related to hematoma resolution following particle MMA embolization.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MMA embolization for CSDH were enrolled. The CSDHs were quantitatively divided into 2 hematoma groups based on the hematoma density at 1-week postembolization: low-density or high-density. The temporal change in the volume of CSDHs was then analyzed between the groups.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Three patients with high-density hematomas required rescue surgery. The hematoma volume was significantly lower in low-density hematomas than in high-density hematoma at 1-week (P = 0.006), 1-month (P = 0.003), and 2-month (P = 0.004) postembolization; although the volume converged to a similar value at 3-month (P > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between hematoma density at 1-week postembolization and percentage hematoma volume at 1-week and 1-month postembolization (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001, respectively), but no correlation was observed between hematoma density before MMA embolization and percentage hematoma volume at 1-week and 1-month postembolization (P = 0.54 and P = 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid resolution of CSDH following MMA embolization was associated with low hematoma density at 1-week postembolization. Based on hematoma density on computed tomography at 1-week postembolization, a 1-month follow-up would be sufficient in cases of low density, but a 3-month follow-up would be required in cases of high-density hematoma. Larger studies and clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Comparative study on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of chronic subdural hematomas treated by middle meningeal artery embolization and conventional treatment: a national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The authors compared the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and conventional treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH).

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database of 9963 patients (27.2% women) with cSDH between 2016 and 2020 was analyzed. Finally, 9532 patients were included (95.7%, treated conventionally; 4.3%, treated with MMAE). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, adverse events, treatment strategies, and outcomes were compared between patients treated with MMAE and conventional treatment. After propensity score matching, the authors compared primary outcomes, including the 90-day treatment rate, functional outcome, length of hospital stays, and cost. A Markov model estimated lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) associated with different treatments. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to evaluate the base-case scenario. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty in the results.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, MMAE had a lower 90-day retreatment rate (2.6 vs. 9.0%, P =0.001), shorter length of hospital stays (4.61±6.19 vs. 5.73±5.76 days, P =0.037), similar functional outcomes compared (favorable outcomes, 80.9 vs. 74.8%, P =0.224) but higher costs ($119 757.71±90 378.70 vs. $75 745.55±100 701.28, P <0.001) with conventional treatment. MMAE was associated with an additional cost of US$19 280.0 with additional QALY of 1.3. Its ICER was US$15199.8/QALY.

CONCLUSION

MMAE is more effective in treating cSDH than conventional treatment. Based on real-world data, though MMAE incurs higher overall costs, the Markov model showed it to be cost-effective compared to conventional treatment under the American healthcare system. These comparative and economic analyses further support the consideration of a paradigm shift in cSDH treatment.

Administration of Tranexamic Acid After Burr Hole Craniotomy Reduced Postoperative Recurrence of Chronic Subdural Hematoma in a Japanese Regional Population

BACKGROUND

Although tranexamic acid (TXA) has occasionally been used to prevent postoperative recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) after burr hole craniotomy (BC), robust evidence of its efficacy has been lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of postoperative oral administration of TXA after BC for CSDH among the elderly.

METHODS

This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study was carried out with a large Japanese local population-based longitudinal cohort in the Shizuoka Kokuho Database between April 2012 and September 2020. Patients included were age 60 years or older and had undergone BC for CSDH but were not undergoing dialysis. Covariates were collected from records of the preceding 12 months from the month of first BC, and patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was repeat surgery, and the secondary outcome was death or the onset of thrombosis. Data on postoperative TXA administration were collected and compared with controls using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 8544 patients who underwent BC for CSDH, 6647 were included, with 473 placed in the TXA group and 6174 placed in the control group. After 1:1 matching, repeated BC was found to have been performed in 30 of 465 patients (6.5%) in the TXA group and in 78 of 465 patients (16.8%) in the control group (relative risk, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.56). No significant difference was observed for death or the onset of thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of TXA reduced the occurrence of repeat surgery after BC for CSDH.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common diseases in neurosurgery. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is reportedly an option to prevent recurrence or avoid surgery in patients with cSDH. This study was performed to review the evidence on MMAE for cSDH and evaluate its safety, efficacy, indications, and feasibility.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines using an electronic database. The search yielded 43 articles involving 2,783 patients who underwent MMAE.

Results

The hematoma resolution, recurrence, and retreatment rates in the MMAE-alone treatment group (n = 815) were 86.7%, 6.3%, and 9.6%, respectively, whereas those in the prophylactic MMAE with combined surgery group (n = 370) were 95.6%, 4.4%, and 3.4%, respectively. The overall MMAE-related complication rate was 2.3%.

Conclusion

This study shows that MMAE alone is, although not immediate, as effective as evacuation surgery alone in reducing hematoma. The study also shows that combined treatment has a lower recurrence rate than evacuation surgery alone. Because MMAE is a safe procedure, it should be considered for patients with cSDH, especially those with a high risk of recurrence.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma: An Institutional Cohort and Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Conventional Management

BACKGROUND

The treatment of non-acute subdural hematoma (NASDH) is challenging due to its high recurrence rates and comorbidities of mostly elderly patients. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) recently emerged as an alternative to surgery in the treatment of NASDH.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a single center's experience of MMAE with Onyx for NASDH and compare it to a surgically treated historical cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MMAE for NASDH from 2019 to 2021. MMAE was performed with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). Comparisons were made with a historical cohort from 2010 to 2018 who underwent surgical evacuation only, before and after propensity score matching. Outcomes were assessed clinically and radiographically.

RESULTS

We included 44 consecutive patients (55 MMAEs) who underwent MMAE, with a median follow-up of 63.5 days. Twenty-four NASDHs underwent upfront embolization, 17 adjunctive, and 14 for recurrence after prior surgical evacuation, with no significant differences in hematoma and mRS reduction between them. Two patients died during hospitalization and 2 during follow-up, unrelated to the procedure. Mean SDH thickness decreased by 48.3% ± 38.1% (P < 0.001) on last follow-up, which did not correlate with the amount of Onyx injected. Six (13.6%) patients required surgical rescue after embolization. There were no procedure-related complications. The mean modified Rankin Scale (mRS) on admission was 2.8 ± 1.5, which decreased significantly to 1 [1,4] at the last follow-up (P = 0.033). The MMAE (41 hematomas; upfront and adjunctive embolization) and Surgical Evacuation-only (461 hematomas) cohorts were balanced with propensity score mathing. Matching was successful for 41 MMAE and 41 surgical-only hematoma pairs, and only hypertension remained significantly different between the two groups, but there was no significant difference in any outcome.

CONCLUSION

MMAE for NASDH seems safe and effective in appropriately selected patients, non-inferior to surgery, and may become a minimally-invasive alternative. Given our encouraging results, large-scale clinical randomized trials are warranted.

Volumetric resolution of chronic subdural hematomas treated with surgical evacuation versus middle meningeal artery embolization during immediate, early, and late follow up: propensity-score matched cohorts

BACKGROUND

Literature on volumetric resolution and recurrence over time between surgical evacuation alone (SEA) and standalone middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in comparable chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) patients is limited.

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis of cSDH patients managed with either SEA or MMAE was conducted. Propensity-score matching was performed for axial and coronal lengths, maximum diameter, and midline shift. Volumetric measurements at multiple time intervals and recurrence were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

48 matched hematoma pairs in patients with similar demographics, comorbidities, medications, and symptoms were obtained. Median volume was significantly lower at 24 hours in the SEA group (12.6 mL vs 52.7 mL, p<0.001) but not at remaining intervals. Median volume reduction was significantly greater in the SEA group at 24 hours (39.1 mL vs 8.8 mL in the MMAE group, p<0.001) and at 3-12 weeks (50.8 mL vs 23.7 mL, p<0.001), but not at remaining intervals. The SEA group had a significantly greater median hematoma resolution rate at 24 hours (39.1 mL/day vs 8.8 mL/day, p<0.001) and 3-12 weeks (1 mL/day vs 0.4 mL/day, p<0.001), but not at remaining intervals. Near-complete resolution at 3-12 weeks and 12-60 weeks was not significantly different between groups. Overall, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the SEA group (22.9% vs 4.2%, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparable cSDH patients, SEA resulted in better volumetric outcomes in immediate postoperative and early follow-up periods, as expected. However, this difference was not significant at more distant follow-up intervals. Furthermore, surgical patients experienced a significantly higher rate of recurrence.

Extensive Roles and Technical Advances of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common pathology that typically affects the elderly in Japan, an aging society. Burr-hole irrigation is the standard treatment, but middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a minimally invasive alternative. MMA embolization for CSDH has frequently been reported in recent years, and many technical innovations to improve clinical outcomes have been described. Embolic materials reaching more distally are found to avoid recurrences after MMA embolization. As a result, various studies have described the superiority of embolizing the anterior and posterior branches of the MMA, the advantages of embolic materials reaching beyond the midline, and a high degree of distal penetration using a "sugar rush technique" in which 5% soluble glucose is injected through an intermediate catheter during MMA embolization. Radiographically, reports have described the importance of a "bright falx" sign obtained by infiltrating embolic material beyond the midline and post-embolization enhancement of the dura, capsular membrane, septations, and subdural hematoma fluid as indicators of the spread of embolic materials. This review provides an overview of the current status and future challenges in MMA embolization for CSDH, focusing on technical aspects to improve clinical outcomes.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of chronic subdural hematomas: does selection of embolized branches affect outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization (MMAE) is a new therapeutic modality for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). There is limited evidence comparing various MMAE procedural techniques, resulting in significant variations in technique and procedural planning. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of MMAE by the number and location of MMA branches that were embolized.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of patients with cSDH treated by MMAE was conducted. Clinical outcomes, need for re-intervention, and changes in hematoma size were compared between different MMAE techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-four cSDHs in 78 patients were included. Embolization of the proximal trunk only, distal branches only, or proximal trunk plus distal branches resulted in similar rates of need for rescue surgery (7.4%, 13.0%, and 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.66) and rates of reducing the volume of the hematoma by at least 50% (74.1%, 80.0%, and 77.5%, respectively; p = 0.88). Embolization of only one branch had similar outcomes to embolization of more than one branch, as rescue surgery rates were 9.3% and 7.8% (p = 0.80), and rates ≥ 50% volume reduction were 75.6% and 78.3% (p = 0.76), respectively. Selective embolization of the dominant MMA branch was not associated with significantly different outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of distal, proximal, or combined proximal and distal MMAE in cSDH are not significantly different. Embolization of more than one branch is not associated with improved treatment efficacy. Arguably, targeting any location in the MMA provides sufficient flow restriction to enable spontaneous hematoma resolution. Accordingly, a technical planning algorithm for cSDH MMAE is suggested.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Management for Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The results from studies that compare middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization vs conventional management for patients with chronic subdural hematoma are varied.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies that compared MMA embolization vs conventional management.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Primary outcomes were treatment failure and surgical rescue; secondary outcomes were complications, follow-up modified Rankin scale > 2, mortality, complete hematoma resolution, and length of hospital stay (day). The certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Nine studies yielding 1523 patients were enrolled, of which 337 (22.2%) and 1186 (77.8%) patients received MMA embolization and conventional management, respectively. MMA embolization was superior to conventional management for treatment failure (relative risk [RR] = 0.34 [0.14-0.82], P = .02), surgical rescue (RR = 0.33 [0.14-0.77], P = .01), and complete hematoma resolution (RR = 2.01 [1.10-3.68], P = .02). There was no difference between the 2 groups for complications (RR = 0.93 [0.63-1.37], P = .72), follow-up modified Rankin scale >2 (RR = 0.78 [0.449-1.25], P = .31), mortality (RR = 1.05 [0.51-2.14], P = .89), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = -0.57 [-2.55, 1.41], P = .57). For MMA embolization, the number needed to treat for treatment failure, surgical rescue, and complete hematoma resolution was 7, 9, and 3, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to high for primary outcomes and low to moderate for secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

MMA embolization decreases treatment failure and the need for surgical rescue without furthering the risk of morbidity and mortality. The authors recommend considering MMA embolization in the chronic subdural hematoma management.

Short-term follow-up pilot study of sole middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: influence of internal architecture on the radiological outcomes

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors with emphasis on chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) architecture that determines short-term outcome of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE).

METHODS

Consecutive CSDH patients treated by MMAE (November 2019 and March 2022) were retrospectively analyzed. Four architectures were analyzed: homogeneous, laminar, separated, and trabecular types. Predictor variables from baseline CT were correlated with radiological endpoint (≥ 50% of hematoma volume reduction), time to reach the endpoint, and rate of volume reduction.

RESULTS

Study included 50 patients with 56 CSDHs (median age [first quartile, Q1; third quartile, Q3] 70.5 [60, 78.3] years; 36 were men). Separated type reached the endpoint at a lower rate on both bivariate (p = 0.02) and multivariate Cox model (0.034). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that the median [Q1, Q3] time for 50% of the hematomas to reach the endpoint was 5 [4, 8], 4 [3, 5], 15 [15, 15], and 11 [4, 19] weeks for homogeneous, laminar, separated, and trabecular types, respectively. Linear mixed-effect model demonstrated a significant variation in the slope of hematoma volume reduction that was - 4.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 5.4, - 2.9), - 6.7 (95% CI - 8.35, - 5.1), - 2.03 (95% CI - 4.14, 0.08), and - 5.06 (95% CI - 6.8, - 3.32) ml per week for homogeneous, laminar, separated, and trabecular subtypes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Separated CSDH is a poor prognostic type in achieving radiological endpoint and a slower rate of volume reduction. While, homogeneous and laminar types reached the endpoint faster than separated and trabecular types on short-term follow-up.

Cost Comparison for Open Surgery versus Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) can be treated with conventional surgery or middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE). The cost profiles of open surgery versus MMAE have never been studied. Therefore, we sought to compare the costs of surgical and MMAE treatment of cSDH.

METHODS

Patients treated with open surgery (2006-2019) and MMAE (2018-2020) were identified from the institutional database. Propensity score matching analysis was used to assemble a balanced group of subjects. Detailed hospitalization costs in each group were collected and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 341 conventionally treated and 52 MMAE cases were identified. After propensity score matching, 33 patients were included in each group, for a total of 66 patients for analysis. Direct procedural cost was significantly greater in the MMAE group compared with the open surgery group ($38,255 ± $11,859 vs. $11,206 ± $7888; P < 0.001). Medication cost also was greater in the MMAE group ($6888 ± $6525 vs. $4291 ± $3547; P = 0.048). No significant difference was found in costs for intensive care unit care, pharmacy, therapy, laboratory values, and the emergency department. Imaging costs and other miscellaneous costs (e.g., wound care, preoperative, and postanesthesia care unit) were greater in the open surgery group (P < 0.05). Total hospitalization cost was not significantly different between the 2 groups ($60,598 ± 61,315 vs. $71,569 ± $37,813 for open surgery and MMAE respectively, P = 0.385). No significant differences in number of follow ups or total costs for follow up were found (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgery and MMAE offer an overall equivalent cost-profile for cSDH treatment when matching for potential cost confounders. Direct procedural costs are greater in MMAE; however, total hospitalization costs and follow up costs are not significantly different.

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive puncture and drainage versus trepanation and drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) versus trepanation and drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database were searched for studies on the treatment of CSDH by MIPD and trepanation and drainage. By reading the title, abstract and full text, and screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the qualified articles were confirmed. Subsequently, the literature quality was evaluated based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and the data of the research subjects and the primary outcome measures were extracted for meta-analysis with RevMan 5.1 software.

RESULTS

Ten articles were included, with a total of 1000 patients. According to the meta-analysis, the 2 groups showed no statistical difference in CSDH recurrence rate (P > .05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions were lower and the cure rate was higher in the MIPD group compared with trepanation and drainage group (all P < .05). By drawing the funnel plot of the outcome measures with heterogeneity, it can be seen that the distribution on both sides of the funnel was basically symmetrical, suggesting a low deviation possibility of the analysis results and reliable reference significance of our findings.

CONCLUSION

Compared with trepanation and drainage, MIPD has better clinical effects and higher safety in treating CSDH and can effectively reduce surgery-induced damage, which is worth popularizing in clinical practice.

The Short-Term Outcome of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma with Mild Symptom: Case Series

OBJECTIVE

A few reports have demonstrated the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) alone for mildly symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH); however, the clinical course in the early posttreatment period remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to analyze the short-term outcomes of this technique at our center.

METHODS

This study was based on a retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive case series. Patients with mildly symptomatic CSDH treated with MMAE alone between July 2020 and June 2022 were examined. Neurological examinations and head computed tomography scans were performed before treatment and 1, 7, 14, and 28 days after treatment. The clinical course of the patients was analyzed. In particular, symptom improvement within 1 week from treatment or rescue evacuation and the factors associated were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included in this study. No procedure-related complications occurred. Partial or complete recovery within the first week from treatment was observed in 10 cases (66.7%), and the symptoms resolved completely in a median of 26 (6.5-33.5) days. Rescue evacuation was needed in 3 cases (20.0%). The hematoma volume and midline shift gradually decreased from baseline, with a significant improvement within the first week (P = 0.030 and 0.0032, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MMAE alone provides relatively early improvement in cases of mildly symptomatic CSDH and may be a potential alternative to surgical evacuation or medical therapy.

Embolic Agent Choice in Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization as Primary or Adjunct Treatment for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization is an emerging treatment option for chronic subdural hematomas.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess outcomes following middle meningeal artery embolization by different techniques, including in comparison with traditional surgical methods.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the literature databases from inception to March 2022.

DATA SELECTION

We selected studies reporting outcomes after middle meningeal artery embolization as a primary or adjunctive treatment for chronic subdural hematoma.

DATA ANALYSIS

We analyzed the risk of recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma, reoperation for recurrence or residual hematoma, complications, and radiologic and clinical outcomes using random effects modeling. Additional analyses were performed on the basis of whether middle meningeal artery embolization was used as the primary or adjunct treatment and by embolic agent type.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-two studies were included with 382 patients with middle meningeal artery embolization and 1373 surgical patients. The rate of subdural hematoma recurrence was 4.1%. Fifty (4.2%) patients underwent a reoperation for a recurrent or residual subdural hematoma. Thirty-six (2.6%) experienced postoperative complications. The rates of good radiologic and clinical outcomes were 83.1% and 73.3%, respectively. Middle meningeal artery embolization was significantly associated with decreased odds of subdural hematoma reoperation (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 23.4-99.1; P = .047) compared with surgery. The lowest rates of subdural hematoma radiologic recurrence, reoperation, and complications were observed among patients receiving embolization with Onyx, whereas good overall clinical outcome occurred most commonly with combined polyvinyl alcohol and coils.

LIMITATIONS

A limitation was the retrospective design of studies included.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle meningeal artery embolization is safe and effective, either as a primary or adjunctive treatment. Treatment using Onyx seems to yield lower rates of recurrence, rescue operation, and complications whereas particles and coils produce good overall clinical outcomes.

Subdural evacuating port system with subdural thrombolysis for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma in patients older than 80 years

Objective

The subdural evacuating port system (SEPS) is a minimally invasive approach that can be performed under local anesthesia for the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Subdural thrombolysis has been described as an exhaustive drainage strategy and found to be safe and effective for improving drainage. We aim to analyze the effectiveness of SEPS with subdural thrombolysis in patients older than 80 years.

Method

Consecutive patients aged ≥80 years old who presented with symptomatic CSDH and underwent SEPS followed by subdural thrombolysis between January 2014 and February 2021 were retrospectively studied. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, recurrence, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge and 3 months.

Results

In total, 52 patients with CSDH in 57 hemispheres were operated on, with a mean age of 83.9 ± 3.3 years, and 40 (76.9%) patients were men. The preexisting medical comorbidities were observed in 39 patients (75.0%). Postoperative complications occurred in nine patients (17.3%), with two having significant complications (3.8%). The complications observed included pneumonia (11.5%), acute epidural hematoma (3.8%), and ischemic stroke (3.8%). One patient experienced contralateral malignant middle cerebral artery infarction and died of subsequent severe herniation, contributing to a perioperative mortality rate of 1.9%. Discharge and 3 months of favorable outcomes (mRS score 0-3) were achieved in 86.5% and 92.3% of patients, respectively. CSDH recurrence was observed in five patients (9.6%), and repeat SEPS was performed.

Conclusion

As an exhaustive drainage strategy, SEPS followed by thrombolysis is safe and effective with excellent outcomes among elderly patients. It is a technically easy and less invasive procedure with similar complications, mortality, and recurrence rates compared with burr-hole drainage in the literature.

Reduced recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas treated with open surgery followed by middle meningeal artery embolization compared to open surgery alone: a propensity score-matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an emerging endovascular treatment technique with proven promising results for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). MMAE as an adjunct to open surgery is being utilized with the goal of preventing the recurrence of cSDH. However, the efficacy of MMAE following surgical evacuation of cSDH has not been clearly demonstrated. The authors sought to compare the outcomes of open surgery followed by MMAE versus open surgery alone.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical evacuation alone (open surgery-alone group) or MMAE along with open surgery for cSDH (adjunctive MMAE group) were identified at the authors' institution. Two balanced groups were obtained through propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included recurrence risk and reintervention rate. Secondary outcomes included decrease in hematoma size and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at last follow-up. Variables in the two groups were compared by use of the Mann-Whitney U-test, paired-sample t-test, and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 345 cases of open surgery alone and 52 cases of open surgery with adjunctive MMAE were identified. After control for subjective confounders, 146 patients treated with open surgery alone and 41 with adjunctive MMAE following open surgery with drain placement were included in the analysis. Before matching, the rebleeding risk and reintervention rate for open surgery trended higher in the open surgery alone than the open surgery plus MMAE group (14.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.18; and 11.6% vs 4.9%, p = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were seen in duration of radiographic or clinical follow-ups or decreases in hematoma size and mRS score at last follow-up. After one-to-one nearest neighbor propensity score matching, 26 pairs of cases were compared for outcomes. Rates of recurrence (7.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.038) and overall reintervention (3.8% vs 23.1%, p = 0.049) after open surgery were found to be significantly lower in the adjunctive MMAE group than the open surgery-alone group. With one-to-many propensity score matching, 76 versus 37 cases were compared for open surgery alone versus adjunctive MMAE following open surgery. Similarly, the adjunctive MMAE group had significantly lower rates of recurrence (5.4% vs 19.7%, p = 0.037) and overall reintervention (2.7% vs 14.5%, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive MMAE following open surgery can lower the recurrence risks and reintervention rates for cSDH.

Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-analysis of 455 Studies With 103 645 Cases

BACKGROUND

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition with a high risk of recurrence after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the risk of recurrence, morbidity, and mortality across various treatments for CSDH.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched from January 01, 2000, to July 07, 2021. The primary outcome was recurrence, and secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality. Component network meta-analyses (CNMAs) were performed for surgical and medical treatments, assessing recurrence and morbidity. Incremental risk ratios (iRRs) with 95% CIs were estimated for each component.

RESULTS

In total, 12 526 citations were identified, and 455 studies with 103 645 cases were included. Recurrence occurred in 11 491/93 525 (10.8%, 95% CI 10.2-11.5, 418 studies) cases after surgery. The use of a postoperative drain (iRR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.63) and middle meningeal artery embolization (iRR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.83) reduced recurrence in the surgical CNMA. In the pharmacological CNMA, corticosteroids (iRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.61) and surgical intervention (iRR 0.11, 95% CI 0.07-0.15) were associated with lower risk. Corticosteroids were associated with increased morbidity (iRR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.70). The risk of morbidity was equivalent across surgical treatments.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence after evacuation occurs in approximately 10% of cSDHs, and the various surgical interventions are approximately equivalent. Corticosteroids are associated with reduced recurrence but also increased morbidity. Drains reduce the risk of recurrence, but the position of drain (subdural vs subgaleal) did not influence recurrence. Middle meningeal artery embolization is a promising treatment warranting further evaluation in randomized trials.

Endoscopically observed outer membrane of chronic subdural hematoma after endovascular embolization of middle meningeal artery

Background:

Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) has been established for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Neuroendoscopic observation of the outer membrane of the hematoma was carried out after embolization. The treatment mechanism of embolization is discussed, focusing on the vasculature and inflammation of the membrane.

Methods:

Four patients with recurrent CSDH were included in this study. The MMA was embolized using Embosphere® particles in three patients. The outer membrane was observed with normal and narrow band images (NBIs).

Results:

The net-like vessels were not obstructed in the whole area of the outer membrane, but in a patchy fashion of embolized areas surrounded by nonembolized areas. In two patients, the nonembolized areas showed a hemorrhagic inflammatory red color. Histopathological examination confirmed hypertrophic dura with leukocyte infiltration. Dilated dural arteries and proliferated sinusoid arteries were located in the deep and superficial border cell layers. These arteries were visualized as green and brown on NBI, respectively. In the embolized area, the red membrane turned pink, indicating ischemia and subsiding inflammatory hyperemia. In the third patient, the outer membrane was white in both the nonembolized and embolized areas in endoscopic view, and the net-like vessels were sparse in both endoscopy and histology, indicating a scar inflammatory phase. The membrane transition was not observed in the patient that did not undergo embolization.

Conclusion:

Endoscopic observation revealed that embolization of the MMA blocked both the dural and sinusoidal arteries. Ischemic transformation causing the suppression of inflammation of the outer membrane is a suggested mechanism of MMA embolization.

Subdural evacuation port system and middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: a multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization and the Subdural Evacuation Port System (SEPS) are minimally invasive treatment paradigms for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Although SEPS offers acute decompression of local mass effect from a cSDH, MMA embolization has been shown to reduce the rate of cSDH recurrence. In combination, these procedures present a potentially safer strategy to a challenging pathology. The authors present a multi-institutional retrospective case series that assessed the safety, efficacy, and complications of SEPS and MMA embolization for cSDH.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent SEPS placement and MMA embolization for cSDH between 2018 and 2021 at three institutions.

RESULTS

One hundred patients with 136 cSDHs and a median age of 73 years underwent both SEPS placement and MMA embolization. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale scores were between 14 and 15 in 81% of patients and between 9 and 13 in 14%. The median initial midline shift (MLS) was 7 mm, with subdural hematoma (SDH) in the left hemisphere (lh) in 30% of patients, right hemisphere (rh) in 34%, and bilateral hemispheres in 36%. Follow-up was available for 86 patients: 93.4% demonstrated decreased MLS, and all patients with lhSDH and rhSDH demonstrated progressive decrease in SDH size. The overall complication rate was 4%, including 1 case of facial palsy and 3 cases of iatrogenic acute SDH. Two subjects (2%) required craniotomy for hematoma evacuation. The rate of good functional outcomes, with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score < 2, was 89% on final follow-up and the overall mortality rate was 2%. A good mRS score on admission was associated with increased odds of functional improvement at follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SEPS placement with MMA embolization for cSDH can be done safely and effectively reduces cSDH size with minimal perioperative morbidity.

Trends and Outcomes of Primary, Rescue, and Adjunct Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematomas

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an effective minimally invasive treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). The authors investigated outcomes of primary, adjunct, and rescue MMAE and primary surgery for the treatment of cSDH using a large-scale national database.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all patients who underwent MMAE and/or surgery to treat cSDH was performed using the TriNetX Analytics Network. Primary MMAE was compared with adjunct and rescue MMAE and primary surgery. Primary outcomes included headache, facial weakness, mortality, and treatment failure, within 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 4274 patients with cSDH met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 209 (4.9%) were treated with primary MMAE, 4050 (94.8%) were treated with primary surgery, 15 (0.35%) were treated using MMAE as an adjunct therapy, and 18 (0.42%) were treated using MMAE as a rescue following a failed surgical intervention. There were no significant differences in headache, facial weakness, and mortality between the groups. Patients who underwent primary MMAE had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (P < 0.0001) than those who underwent primary surgery. The need for surgical rescue was not significantly different between primary MMAE, adjunct MMAE, and rescue MMAE (P > 0.05). Additionally, patients with primary surgery had significantly higher treatment failure than those with primary MMAE (odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.11-4.01, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests no significant difference in the need for surgical rescue, complication, or mortality between primary MMAE, adjunct MMAE, and rescue MMAE. Additionally, primary MMAE is associated with a significantly lower need for surgical rescue than primary surgery.

Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematomas through Embolization: A Pilot Study with a Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Agent of Minimal Viscosity (Squid)

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular embolization using non-adhesive agents (e.g., ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer with suspended micronized tantalum dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide; Squid, Balt Extrusion) is an established treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations, dural arteriovenous fistulas, and hypervascular neoplasms. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a relatively new concept for treating chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of Squid in the endovascular treatment of CSDH.

METHODS

Embolization was offered to patients with CSDH with minimal or moderate neurological deficits and patients who had previously undergone open surgery to evacuate their CSDH without a significant effect. Distal catheterization of the MMA was followed by embolization of the hematoma capsule with Squid 12 or Squid 18. Safety endpoints were ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke and any other adverse event of the endovascular procedure. Efficacy endpoints were the feasibility of the intended procedure and a ≥ 50% reduction of the maximum depth of the CSDH confirmed by follow-up computed tomography (CT) after >3 months.

RESULTS

Between November 2019 and July 2021, 10 patients (3 female and 7 male, age range 42-89 years) were enrolled. Five patients had bilateral hematomas, and five patients had previously been operated on with no significant effect and recurrent hematoma formation. The attempted embolization was technically possible in all patients. No technical or clinical complication was encountered. During a post-procedural follow-up (median 90 days), 10 patients improved clinically. A complete resolution of the CSDH was observed in 10 patients. The clinical condition of all enrolled patients during the so-far last contact was rated mRS 0 or 1.

CONCLUSION

A distal catheterization of the MMA for the endovascular embolization of CSDH with Squid allowed for the devascularization of the MMA and the dependent vessels of the hematoma capsule. This procedure resulted in a partial or complete resolution of the CSDH. Procedural complications were not encountered.