Is Operative Time Associated With Obesity-related Outcomes in TKA?

BACKGROUND

Obesity-based cutoffs in TKA are premised on higher rates of postoperative complications. However, operative time may be associated with postoperative complications, leading to an unnecessary restriction of TKA in patients with obesity. If operative time is associated with these obesity-related outcomes, it should be accounted for in order to ensure all measurable factors associated with negative outcomes are examined for patients with obesity after TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) Is operative time, controlling for BMI class, associated with readmission, reoperation, and postoperative major and minor complications? (2) Is operative time associated with a difference in the direction or strength of obesity-related adverse outcomes?

METHODS

In this comparative study, we extracted all records on elective, unilateral TKA between January 2014 and December 2020 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, resulting in an initial sample of 394,381 TKAs. Patients with emergency procedures (0.1% [270]) and simultaneous bilateral TKAs (2% [8736]), missing or null data (1% [4834]), and those with operative times less than 25 minutes (0.1% [548]) were excluded, leaving 96% (379,993) of our original sample size. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was selected because of its inclusion of operative time, which is not found in any other national database. BMI was subdivided into underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m 2 , < 1% [719]), normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m 2 , 9% [34,513]), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m 2 , 27% [101,538]), Class I obesity (BMI 30.0 to 34.9 kg/m 2 , 29% [111,712]), Class II obesity (BMI 35.0 to 39.9 kg/m 2 , 20% [76,605]), and Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40.0 kg/m 2 , 14% [54,906]). The mean operative time was 91 ± 36 minutes, 61% of patients were women (233,062 of 379,993), and the mean age was 67 ± 9 years. Patients with obesity tended to be younger and more likely to have preoperative comorbidities and longer operative times than patients with normal weight. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the main effects of operative time with respect to 30-day readmission, reoperation, and major and minor medical complications, while adjusting for BMI class and other covariates including age, sex, race, smoking status, and number of preoperative comorbidities. We then evaluated the potential interaction effect of BMI class and operative time. This interaction term helps determine whether the association of BMI with postoperative outcomes changes based on the duration of the surgery, and vice versa. If the interaction term is statistically significant, it implies the association of BMI with adverse postoperative outcomes is inconsistent across all patients. Instead, it varies with the operative time. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and interaction effects were plotted.

RESULTS

After controlling for obesity, longer procedure duration was independently associated with higher odds of all outcomes (30-minute estimates; adjusted ORs are per minute), including readmission (9% per half-hour of surgical duration; adjusted OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.003 to 1.004]; p < 0.001), reoperation (15% per half-hour of surgical duration; adjusted OR 1.005 [95% CI 1.004 to 1.005]; p < 0.001), postoperative major complications (9% per half-hour of surgical duration; adjusted OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.003 to 1.004]; p < 0.001), and postoperative minor complications (18% per half-hour of surgical duration; adjusted OR 1.006 [95% CI 1.006 to 1.007]; p < 0.001). The interaction effect indicates that patients with obesity had lower odds of reoperation than patients with normal weight when operative times were shorter, but higher odds of reoperation with a longer operative duration.

CONCLUSION

We found that operative time, a proxy for surgical complexity, had a moderate, differential association with obesity over a 30-minute period. Perioperative modification of surgical complexity such as surgical techniques, training, and team dynamics may make safe TKA possible for certain patients who might have otherwise been denied surgery. Decisions to refuse TKA to patients with obesity should be based on a holistic assessment of a patient's operative complexity, rather than strictly assessing a patient's weight or their ability to lose weight. Future studies should assess patient-specific characteristics that are associated with operative time, which can further push the development of techniques and strategies that reduce surgical complexity and improve TKA outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Appraising the Quality of Reporting of Vascular Surgery Studies That Use the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database

OBJECTIVE

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) is an important data source for observational studies. While there are guides to ensure appropriate study reporting, there has been no evaluation of NSQIP studies in vascular surgery. We sought to evaluate the adherence of vascular-surgery related NSQIP studies to best reporting practices.

METHODS

In January 2022, we queried PubMed for all vascular surgery NSQIP studies. We used the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) statement and the JAMA Surgery (JAMA-Surgery) checklist to assess reporting methodology. We also extracted the Journal Impact Factor (IF) of each article.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-nine studies published between 2002 and 2022 were identified and analyzed. The median score on the RECORD statement was 6 out of 8. The most commonly missed RECORD statement items were describing any validation of codes and providing data cleaning information. The median score on the JAMA-Surgery checklist was 2 out of 7. The most commonly missed JAMA-Surgery checklist items were identifying competing risks, using flow charts to help visualize study populations, having a solid research question and hypothesis, identifying confounders, and discussing the implications of missing data. We found no difference in the reporting methodology of studies published in high vs low IF journals.

CONCLUSION

Vascular surgery studies using NSQIP data demonstrate poor adherence to research reporting standards. Critical areas for improvement include identifying competing risks, including a solid research question and hypothesis, and describing any validation of codes. Journals should consider requiring authors use reporting guides to ensure their articles have stringent reporting methodology.

Does Operative Time Modify Obesity-related Outcomes in THA?

BACKGROUND

Most orthopaedic surgeons refuse to perform arthroplasty on patients with morbid obesity, citing the higher rate of postoperative complications. However, that recommendation does not account for the relationship of operative time (which is often longer in patients with obesity) to obesity-related arthroplasty outcomes, such as readmission, reoperation, and postoperative complications. If operative time is associated with these obesity-related outcomes, it should be accounted for and addressed to properly assess the risk of patients with obesity undergoing THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore asked: (1) Is the increased risk seen in overweight and obese patients, compared with patients in a normal BMI class, associated with increased operative time? (2) Is increased operative time independent of BMI class a risk factor for readmission, reoperation, and postoperative medical complications? (3) Does operative time modify the direction or strength of obesity-related adverse outcomes?

METHODS

This retrospective, comparative study examined 247,108 patients who underwent THA between January 2014 and December 2020 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP). Of those, emergency cases (1% [2404]), bilateral procedures (1% [1605]), missing and/or null data (1% [3280]), extreme BMI and operative time outliers (1% [2032]), and patients with comorbidities that are not typical of an elective procedure, such as disseminated cancer, open wounds, sepsis, and ventilator dependence (1% [2726]), were excluded, leaving 95% (235,061) of elective, unilateral THA cases for analysis. The NSQIP was selected due to its inclusion of operative time, which is not found in any other national database. BMI was subdivided into underweight, normal weight, overweight, Class I obesity, Class II obesity, and Class III obesity. Of the patients with a normal weight, 69% (30,932 of 44,556) were female and 36% (16,032 of 44,556) had at least one comorbidity, with a mean operative time of 86 ± 32 minutes and a mean age of 68 ± 12 years. Patients with obesity tend to be younger, male, more likely to have preoperative comorbidities, with longer operative times. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the effects of obesity on 30-day readmission, reoperation, and medical complications, while adjusting for age, sex, race, smoking status, and number of preoperative comorbidities. After we repeated this analysis after adjusting for operative time, an interaction model was conducted to test whether operative time changes the direction or strength of the association of BMI class and adverse outcomes. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and the interaction effects were plotted.

RESULTS

A comparison of patients with Class III obesity to patients with normal weight showed that the odds of readmission went from 45% (AOR 1.45 [95% CI 1.32 to 1.59]; p < 0.001) to 27% after adjusting for operative time (AOR 1.27 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.62]; p = 0.04), the odds of reoperation went from 93% (AOR 1.93 [95% CI 1.72 to 2.17]; p < 0.001) to 81% after adjusting for operative time (AOR 1.81 [95% CI 1.61 to 2.04]; p < 0.001), and the odds of a postoperative complication went from 96% (AOR 1.96 [95% CI 1.58 to 2.43]; p < 0.001) to 84% after adjusting for operative time (AOR 1.84 [95% CI 1.48 to 2.28]; p < 0.001). Each 15-minute increase in operative time was associated with a 7% increase in the odds of a readmission (AOR 1.07 [95% CI 1.06 to 1.08]; p < 0.001), a 10% increase in the odds of a reoperation (AOR 1.10 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.12]; p < 0.001), and 10% increase in the odds of a postoperative complication (AOR 1.10 [95% CI 1.08 to 1.13]; p < 0.001). There was a positive interaction effect of operative time and BMI for readmission and reoperation, which suggests that longer operations accentuate the risk that patients with obesity have for readmission and reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Operative time is likely a proxy for surgical complexity and contributes modestly to the adverse outcomes previously attributed to obesity alone. Hence, focusing on modulating the accentuated risk associated with lengthened operative times rather than obesity is imperative to increasing the accessibility and safety of THA. Surgeons may do this with specific surgical techniques, training, and practice. Future studies looking at THA outcomes related to obesity should consider the association with operative time to focus on independent associations with obesity to facilitate more equitable access.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Evaluation of reporting quality of cohort studies using real-world data based on RECORD: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) have been paid more and more attention in recent years. We aimed to evaluate the reporting quality of cohort studies using real-world data (RWD) published between 2013 and 2021 and analyze the possible factors.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline and Embase through the OVID interface for cohort studies published from 2013 to 2021 on April 29, 2022. Studies aimed at comparing the effectiveness or safety of exposure factors in the real-world setting were included. The evaluation was based on the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. Agreement for inclusion and evaluation was calculated using Cohen's kappa. Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyze the possible factors, including the release of RECORD, journal IFs, and article citations. Bonferroni's correction was conducted for multiple comparisons. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to display the changes in report quality over time.

RESULTS

187 articles were finally included. The mean ± SD of the percentage of adequately reported items in the 187 articles was 44.7 ± 14.3 with a range of 11.1-87%. Of 23 items, the adequate reporting rate of 10 items reached 50%, and the reporting rate of some vital items was inadequate. After Bonferroni's correction, the reporting of only one item significantly improved after the release of RECORD and there was no significant improvement in the overall report quality. For interrupted time series analysis, there were no significant changes in the slope (p = 0.42) and level (p = 0.12) of adequate reporting rate. The journal IFs and citations were respectively related to 2 areas and the former significantly higher in high-reporting quality articles.

CONCLUSION

The endorsement of the RECORD cheklist was generally inadequate in cohort studies using RWD and has not improved in recent years. We encourage researchers to endorse relevant guidelines when utilizing RWD for research.

Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Publications in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Research Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

The use of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP has increased in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery (HPB) research as it provides access to high-quality surgical outcome data on a national scale. Using the ACS NSQIP database, this study examined the methodologic reporting of HPB publications.

STUDY DESIGN

Web of Science core collection (all editions) was queried for all HPB studies using the ACS NSQIP database published between 2004 and 2022. In addition, a critical appraisal was performed using the JAMA Surgery checklist, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, and Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) statement.

RESULTS

In total, 276 studies were included in the analysis. The median scores for the JAMA Surgery checklist, RECORD statement, and STROBE statement were 4 of 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 3 to 5), 3 of 10 (IQR 2 to 4), and 15 of 21 (IQR 13 to 17), respectively. The criteria with the highest rates of nonadherence were discussing competing risks, clear definitions of inclusion and exclusion criteria, unadjusted and adjusted outcomes, provision of supplementary data, and performing subgroup analyses. Additionally, when examining checklist fulfillment of hepatobiliary studies and pancreatic studies separately, pancreatic studies demonstrated significantly greater fulfillment of the STROBE statement checklist items.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory reporting of methodology is present among HPB studies utilizing the ACS NSQIP database, with multiple opportunities for improvement. Areas for improved adherence include discussing competing risks, providing supplementary information, and performing appropriate subgroup analysis. Given the increasing role of large-scale databases in surgical research, enhanced commitment to reporting guidelines may advance HPB research and ensure quality reporting.

Assessing the quality of reporting of studies using Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) has become an increasingly popular data source for retrospective observational vascular surgery studies. There are published guidelines on the reporting of data in such studies to promote transparency and rigor, but these have not been used to evaluate studies using VQI data. Our objective was to appraise the methodological reporting quality of studies using VQI data by evaluating their adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS

The Society for Vascular Surgery VQI publication repository was queried for all articles published in 2020. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Health Data (RECORD) statement and the Journal of American Medical Association-Surgical Section (JAMA-Surgery) checklist were utilized to assess the quality of each article's reporting. Five and three items from the RECORD statement and JAMA-Surgery checklist were excluded, respectively, because they were either inapplicable or nonassessable. Journal impact factor (IF) was queried for each article to elucidate any difference in reporting standards between high and low IF journals.

RESULTS

Ninety studies were identified and analyzed. The median score on the RECORD checklist was 6 (of 8). The most commonly missed item was discussing data cleaning methods (93% missed). The median score on the JAMA-Surgery checklist was 3 (of 7). The most commonly missed items were the identification of competing risks (98% missed), the use of a flow chart to clearly define sample exclusion and inclusion criteria (84% missed), and the inclusion of a solid research question and hypothesis (81% missed). There were no differences in JAMA-Surgery checklist or RECORD statement median scores among studies published in low vs high IF journals.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies using VQI data demonstrate a poor to moderate adherence to reporting standards. Key areas for improvement in research reporting include articulating a clear hypothesis, using flow charts to clearly define inclusion and exclusion criteria, identifying competing risks, and discussing data cleaning methods. Additionally, future efforts should center on creating tailored instruments to better guide reporting in studies using VQI data.

Critically Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons TQIP Studies in the Era of Large Data Research

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database is one of the most widely used databases for trauma research. We aimed to critically appraise the quality of the methodological reporting of ACS-TQIP studies.

STUDY DESIGN

The ACS-TQIP bibliography was queried for all studies published between January 2018 and January 2021. The quality of data reporting was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology-Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely Collected Health Data (STROBE-RECORD) statement and the JAMA Surgery checklist. Three items from each tool were not applicable and thus excluded. The quality of reporting was compared between high- and low-impact factor (IF) journals (cutoff for high IF is >90th percentile of all surgical journals).

RESULTS

A total of 118 eligible studies were included; 12 (10%) were published in high-IF journals. The median (interquartile range) number of criteria fulfilled was 5 (4-6) for the STROBE-RECORD statement (of 10 items) and 5 (5-6) for the JAMA Surgery checklist (of 7 items). Specifically, 73% of studies did not describe the patient population selection process, 61% did not address data cleaning or the implications of missing values, and 76% did not properly state inclusion/exclusion criteria and/or outcome variables. Studies published in high-IF journals had remarkably higher quality of reporting than those in low-IF journals.

CONCLUSION

The methodological reporting quality of ACS-TQIP studies remains suboptimal. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to standard reporting guidelines to mitigate potential bias and improve the reproducibility of published studies.

Do Disparities in Wait Times to Operative Fixation for Pathologic Fractures of the Long Bones and 30-day Complications Exist Between Black and White Patients? A Study Using the NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in outcomes after orthopaedic surgery have been well-documented in the fields of arthroplasty, trauma, and spine surgery; however, little research has assessed differences in outcomes after surgery for oncologic musculoskeletal disease. If racial disparities exist in the treatment of patients with pathologic long bone fractures, then they should be identified and addressed to promote equity in patient care.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How do wait times between hospital admission and operative fixation for pathologic fractures of long bones differ between Black and non-Hispanic white patients, after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching? (2) How does the proportion of patients with 30-day postoperative complication differ between these groups after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching?

METHODS

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 828 patients who underwent fixation for pathologic fractures from 2012 to 2018. This database not only provides a large enough sample of pathologic long bone fracture patients to conduct the present study, but also it contains variables such as time from hospitalization to surgery that other national databases do not. After excluding patients with incomplete data (4% of the initial cohort), 775 patients were grouped by self-reported race as Black (12% [94]) or white (88% [681]). Propensity score matching using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor match was then used to match 94 Black patients with 94 white patients according to age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, anemia, endstage renal disease, independence in performing activities of daily living, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary disease. The primary outcome of interest was the number of days between hospital admission and operative fixation, which we assessed using a Poisson regression and report as an incidence risk ratio. The secondary outcomes were the occurrences of major 30-day postoperative adverse events (failure to wean off mechanical ventilation, cerebrovascular events, renal failure, cardiovascular events, reoperation, death), minor 30-day adverse events (reintubation, wound complications, pneumonia, and thromboembolic events), and any 30-day adverse events (defined as the pooling of all adverse events, including readmissions). These outcomes were analyzed using a bivariate analysis and logistic regression with robust estimates of variance and are reported as odds ratios. Because any results on disparities rely on rigorous control of other baseline demographics, we performed this multivariable approach to ensure we were controlling for confounding variables as much as possible.

RESULTS

After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age and gender, we found that Black patients had a longer mean wait time (incidence risk ratio 1.5 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; p = 0.01) than white patients. After controlling for confounding variables, Black patients also had greater odds of having any postoperative adverse event (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.8]; p = 0.02), including readmission (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.6]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The racial disparities in pathologic long bone fracture care found in our study may be attributed to fundamental racial biases, as well as systemic socioeconomic disparities in the US healthcare system. Identifying and eliminating the racial, socioeconomic, and sociocultural biases that drive these disparities would improve care for patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions. One possible way to reduce these disparities would be to implement standardized surgical care pathways for pathological long bone fractures across different institutions to minimize variation in important aspects of care, such as time to surgical fixation. Further insight is needed on the types of standardized care pathways and the implementation mechanisms that are most effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Evaluating the utility and quality of large administrative databases in pediatric spinal neurosurgery research

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of articles utilizing large administrative databases to answer questions related to pediatric spinal neurosurgery by quantifying their adherence to standard reporting guidelines.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted with search terms including "pediatric" and "neurosurgery," associated neurosurgical diagnoses, and the names of known databases. Study abstracts were reviewed to identify clinical studies involving pediatric populations, spine-related pathology or procedures, and large administrative databases. Included studies were graded using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 28 papers of the initial 1496 identified met inclusion criteria. These papers involved 10 databases and had a mean study period of 11.46 ± 12.27 years. The subjects of these research papers were undergoing treatment of scoliosis (n = 5), spinal cord injury (n = 5), spinal cord tumors (n = 9), and spine surgery in general (n = 9). The mean STROBE score was 19.41 ± 2.02 (out of 22).

CONCLUSION

Large administrative databases are commonly used within pediatric spine-related neurosurgical research to cover a broad spectrum of research questions and study topics. The heterogeneity of research to this point encourages the continued use of large databases to better understand treatment and diagnostic trends, perioperative and long-term outcomes, and rare pathologies within pediatric spinal neurosurgery.

The Implications of Same-Day Discharge After Primary Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial anomaly observed in the United States. Permitted by recent advancements in anesthesia and multimodal pain management, there has been a trend toward outpatient cleft lip repair to alleviate hospital burden and minimize healthcare costs. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates between outpatient and inpatient cleft lip repair from large national samples as well as identify preoperative factors that predicted discharge status.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for pediatrics was used to analyze 30-day outcomes for all patients undergoing cleft lip repair (CPT (current procedural terminology) code 40700) from 2012 to 2019. Complication rates were compared across 3 groups: same day discharge, next day discharge, and later discharge. Preoperative factors, including comorbidities and demographics, were analyzed to determine the impact of discharge date on complications as well as identify independent predictors of discharge timing and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 6689 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair, with 16.8% discharging on day of surgery, and 72.4% discharging 1 day after surgery. Complication rates were statistically equivalent between same day and next day discharge. Preoperative factors predicting complication and postoperative admission included age <6 months and weight less than ten pounds at the time of surgery. Patients discharged after more than 1 day in the hospital had higher rates of complications as well as more preoperative comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates between same day and next day discharge are equivalent, suggesting that same day discharge is a safe option in select patients. Clinical judgment is critical in making these decisions.

American college of surgeons NSQIP pancreatic surgery publications: A critical appraisal of the quality of methodological reporting

BACKGROUND

The use of ACS-NSQIP has increased in pancreatic surgery (PS) research. The aim of this study is to critically appraise the methodological reporting of PS publications utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed was queried for all PS studies employing the ACS-NSQIP database published between 2004 and 2021. Critical appraisal was performed using the JAMA-Surgery Checklist, STROBE Statement, and RECORD Statement.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies were included. Median scores for number of fulfilled criteria for the JAMA-Surgery Checklist, STROBE Statement, and RECORD Statement were 6, 20, and 6 respectively. The most commonly unfulfilled criteria were those relating to discussion of missed data, compliance with IRB, unadjusted and adjusted outcomes, providing supplementary/raw information, and performing subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

An overall satisfactory reporting of methodology is present among PS studies utilizing the ACS-NSQIP database. Areas for improved adherence include discussing missed data, providing supplementary information, and performing subgroup analysis. Due to the increasing role of large-scale databases, enhanced adherence to reporting guidelines may advance PS research.

Impact of Hospital Volume on Outcome After Surgical Treatment for Hydrocephalus: A U.S. Population Study From the National Inpatient Sample

Introduction

Hydrocephalus remains a common condition with significant patient morbidity; however, accurate accounting of the incidence of this disease as well as of the impact of hospital volume on outcome remains limited.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample was used to evaluate patients who underwent surgical treatment of hydrocephalus from 2009-2013. Patient demographics (e.g., length of stay, disposition, charges), and the impact of hospital volume on outcomes were evaluated.

Results

A total of 156,205 patients were identified. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting the most common type of device (35.8%) followed by shunt replacement (23.9%). Treatment charges for hydrocephalus were $332 million in 2009 and $418 million in 2013 nationally. High-volume hospitals had more routine discharges compared with lower-volume hospitals (65.7% vs. 50.9%, p<0.0001), which was a trend that improved over time. Multivariate analysis confirmed that hospital volume was independently associated with routine disposition after adjusting for other factors such as patient age, length of stay, and shunt type. However, hospital volume showed a small association with length of stay (β = -0.05, p = 0.0001) and did not impact hospital charges on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

This analysis provides a recent update of hydrocephalus epidemiology, trends, and outcomes nationally. Estimates from this study suggest that hydrocephalus is a common and costly problem. Hospital volume was for the first time to be associated with important differences in patient outcomes.

Appraising the Quality of Reporting of American College of Surgeons NSQIP Emergency General Surgery Studies

BACKGROUND

The quality of emergency general surgery (EGS) studies that use the American College of Surgeons-National Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database is variable. We aimed to critically appraise the methodologic reporting of EGS ACS-NSQIP studies.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched the PubMed ACS-NSQIP bibliography for EGS studies published from 2004 to 2019. The quality of reporting of each study was assessed according to the number of criteria fulfilled with respect to the 13-item RECORD statement and the 10-item JAMA Surgery checklist. Three criteria in each checklist were not applicable and were therefore excluded. An analysis was conducted comparing studies published in high and low impact factor (IF) journals.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 99 eligible studies. Twenty-six percent of studies were published in high IF journals, and 73% of the journals had a policy requiring adherence to reporting statements. The median number of criteria fulfilled for the RECORD statement (out of 10 items) and the JAMA Surgery checklist (out of 7 items) were both equal to 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 3, 5). Sixty-three percent of studies did not explain the methodology for data cleaning, 81% of studies did not describe the population selection process, and 55% did not discuss the implications of missing variables. There were no differences in overall scores between studies published in high and low IF journals.

CONCLUSIONS

The methodologic reporting of EGS studies using ACS-NSQIP remains suboptimal. Future efforts should focus on improving adherence to the policies to mitigate potential sources of bias and improve the credibility of large database studies.

Paediatric cohort studies on lower respiratory diseases and their reporting quality: systematic review of the year 2018

The paediatric respiratory research community uses cohort studies extensively. However, the landscape of these studies and their quality of reporting has not been assessed.We performed a systematic review of publications on cohort studies reporting on paediatric lower respiratory problems published in 2018. We searched MEDLINE and Embase and extracted data on study and journal characteristics. We assessed the number of items of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist that a random sample (100 papers) reported. We analysed factors associated with the STROBE score and with the most poorly reported items, using Poisson and logistic regression.Of the 21 319 records identified, 369 full-text articles met our inclusion criteria. Most papers studied asthma aetiology through birth cohorts and were based in Europe or North America. The reporting quality was insufficient: 15% reported the 22 STROBE items; median (interquartile range) score 18 (16-21). The most poorly reported items were sources of bias, sample size, statistical methods, descriptive results and generalisability. None of the study or journal factors were associated with the STROBE score.We need a joint effort of editors, reviewers and authors to improve the reporting quality of paediatric cohort studies on respiratory problems.

Utility of the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index for Predicting Adverse Outcomes Following Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

BACKGROUND

Frailty is an increasingly studied tool for preoperative risk stratification, but its prognostic value for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients is unclear. We sought to evaluate the association of the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5i-mFI) with 30-day adverse outcomes following ACDF and its predictive performance compared with other common metrics.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried from 2016-2018 for patients undergoing elective ACDF for degenerative diseases. Outcomes of interest included 30-day complications, extended length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge, and unplanned readmissions. Unadjusted/adjusted odds ratios were calculated. The discriminatory performance of the 5i-mFI compared with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and body mass index was computed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A total of 23,754 patients were identified. On adjusted analysis, an index of 1 was significantly associated with extended LOS, non-home discharge, and unplanned readmissions (P < 0.001, P = 0.023, P = 0.003, respectively), but not complications (all P > 0.05). An index ≥2 was significantly associated with each outcome (all P < 0.001). The 5i-mFI was found to have a significantly higher AUC than body mass index for each outcome, a similar AUC compared with ASA classification and age for complications and unplanned readmissions, and a significantly lower AUC than ASA classification and age for extended LOS and non-home discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5i-mFI was found to be significantly associated with 30-day adverse outcomes following ACDF but had similar or lesser predictive performance compared with more universally available and easily implemented metrics, such as ASA classification and age.