Evaluation of improvements in plan quality with Photon Optimizer v16.1 for single brain lesion SRS treatment

Background

The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the Photon Optimizer (PO) version 16.1 algorithm with its earlier version PO v13.6 and with Progressive Resolution Optimizer (PRO) version 13.6 algorithms.

Materials and methods

20 patients with single brain lesions treated with the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technique were retrospectively selected for this study. Initially, for all patients volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) SRS plans were generated with the PRO v 13.6 algorithm. Then, all the plans were re-generated with two versions 13.6 and 16.1 of PO algorithm using the same setup and dose-volume optimization objectives as that of PRO with a similar planning approach. The quality of the generated plans was analysed using ICRU 91 plan evaluation parameters and also using dice similarity co-efficient (DSC), centre of mass distance (CMD) between target and prescription isodose line, Monitor units (MU) and brain-gross tumor volume (GTV) 12 Gy volume. Paired Student t-test was used for statistical analysis with 0.05 as a significant value.

Results

PO v16.1 improved all the dosimetric parameters studied compared to PO 13.6, the difference is statistically significant for all the parameters (p < 0.05), except for median dose and brain-GTV 12 Gy volume. PO v16.1 also showed statistically significant improvement for all the dosimetric parameters evaluated, except DSC and conformity index (CI), compared to PRO v13.6.

Conclusion

The PO v16.1 generated plans are dosimetrically superior to PO v13.6 and PRO v13.6 in terms of target dose coverage and dose gradient with lesser beam modulation and plan complexity for single brain lesion SRS.

A study on inter-planner plan quality variability using a manual planning- or Lightning dose optimizer-approach for single brain lesions treated with the Gamma Knife® Icon™

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate inter-planner plan quality variability using a manual forward planning (MFP)- or fast inverse planning (FIP, Lightning)-approach for single brain lesions treated with the Gamma Knife® (GK) Icon™.

METHODS

Thirty patients who were previously treated with GK stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy were selected and divided into three groups (post-operative resection cavity, intact brain metastasis, and vestibular schwannoma [10 patients per group]). Clinical plans for the 30 patients were generated by multiple planners using FIP only (1), a combination of FIP and MFP (12), and MFP only (17). Three planners (Senior, Junior, and Novice) with varying experience levels re-planned the 30 patients using MFP and FIP (two plans per patient) with planning time limit of 60 min. Statistical analysis was performed to compare plan quality metrics (Paddick conformity index, gradient index, number of shots, prescription isodose line, target coverage, beam-on-time (BOT), and organs-at-risk doses) of MFP or FIP plans among three planners and to compare plan quality metrics between each planner's MFP/FIP plans and clinical plans. Variability in FIP parameter settings (BOT, low dose, and target max dose) and in planning time among the planners was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Variations in plan quality metrics of FIP plans among three planners were smaller than those of MFP plans for all three groups. Junior's MFP plans were the most comparable to the clinical plans, whereas Senior's and Novice's MFP plans were superior and inferior, respectively. All three planners' FIP plans were comparable or superior to the clinical plans. Differences in FIP parameter settings among the planners were observed. Planning time was shorter and variations in planning time among the planners were smaller for FIP plans in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The FIP approach is less planner dependent and more time-honored than the MFP approach.

Comparing Fractionated and Single-Fraction Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With a Focus on Driver Alterations

Background As the overall survival in non-small-cell lung cancer has increased, safer, long-term treatments for brain metastases are increasingly needed. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of fractionated and single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer, focusing on driver alteration status. Methodology Patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery as their first local treatment for brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer between May 2018 and December 2021 at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. Results Among the 98 patients (287 lesions), 45 (130 lesions) harbored driver alterations, including epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in 35 patients and anaplastic lymphoma kinase or ROS1 rearrangement in 10 patients. Overall, 64 and 34 patients underwent single-fraction and fractionated radiosurgery (3-15 fractions), respectively. Large tumor size was a risk factor for recurrence, while fractionated radiosurgery (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 16.47; confidence interval (CI) = 3.58-75.77; p < 0.001) and small tumor size (sHR = 1.15; CI = 1.04-1.28; p = 0.008) independently protected against radiation necrosis. In the case-matched analyses, the cumulative radiation necrosis rates were significantly lower in the fractionated group than in the single-fraction group among all lesions (p = 0.017) and among those with driver alterations (p = 0.046), whereas no significant difference was confirmed among wild-type lesions (p = 0.382). Conclusions Fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery may be an alternative therapeutic approach for reducing the risk of radiation necrosis, particularly for patients with driver alterations, even when the tumors are small. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal indications for fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery and fractionation methods.

Conventionally fully fractionated Gamma Knife Icon re-irradiation of primary recurrent intracranial tumors: the first report indicating feasibility and safety

OBJECTIVE

With the incorporation of real-time image guidance on the Gamma Knife system allowing for mask-based immobilization (Gamma Knife Icon [GKI]), conventionally fully fractionated (1.8-3.0 Gy/day) GKI radiation can now be delivered to take advantage of an inherently minimal margin for delivery uncertainty, sharp dose falloff, and inhomogeneous dose distribution. This case series details the authors' preliminary experience in re-irradiating 7 complex primary intracranial tumors, which were considered to have been previously maximally radiated and situated adjacent to critical organs at risk.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed all patients who received fractionated re-irradiation using GKI at the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, between 2016 and 2021. Patients with brain metastases, and those who received radiotherapy courses in 5 or fewer fractions, were excluded. All radiotherapy doses were converted to the equivalent total dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2), with the assumption of an α/β ratio of 2 for late normal tissue toxicity and 10 for the tumor.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients were included in this case series. Three patients had recurrent meningiomas, as well as 1 patient each with ependymoma, intracranial sarcoma, pituitary macroadenoma, and papillary pineal tumor. Six patients had undergone prior linear accelerator-based conventional fractionated radiotherapy and 1 patient had undergone prior proton therapy. Patients were re-irradiated with a median (range) total dose of 50.4 (30-63.4) Gy delivered in a median (range) of 28 (10-38) fractions with GKI. The median (range) target volume was 6.58 (0.2-46.3) cm3. The median (range) cumulative mean EQD2 administered to the tumor was 121.1 (107.9-181.3) Gy, and the median (range) maximum point EQD2 administered to the brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were 91.6 (74.0-111.5) Gy, 58.9 (6.3-102.9) Gy, and 59.9 (36.7-127.3) Gy, respectively. At a median (range) follow-up of 15 (6-42) months, 6 of 7 patients were alive with 4 having locally controlled disease. Only 3 patients experienced treatment-related toxicities, which were self-limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated radiotherapy using GKI may be a safe and effective method for the re-irradiation of complex progressive primary intracranial tumors, where the aim is to minimize the potential for serious late effects.

Dosimetric evaluation of adult and paediatric brain tumours planned using mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy compared to linear accelerator-based volumetric modulated arc therapy

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a study to evaluate the dosimetric feasibility of mask-based cobalt-60 fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (mcfSRT) with the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ device.

METHODS

Eleven patients with intracranial tumours were selected for this dosimetry study. These patients, previously treated with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), were re-planned using mcfSRT. Target volume coverage, conformity/gradient indices, doses to organs at risk and treatment times were compared between the mcfSRT and VMAT plans. Two-sided paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences between the two plans.

RESULTS

The V95 for PTV was similar between fractionated mcfSRT and VMAT (P = 0.47). The conformity index and gradient indices were 0.9 and 3.3, respectively, for mcfSRT compared to 0.7 and 4.2, respectively, for VMAT (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively). The radiation exposure to normal brain was lower for mcfSRT across V10, V25 and V50 compared with VMAT (P = 0.007, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). The median D0.1cc for optic nerve and chiasm as well as the median D50 to the hippocampi were lower for mcfSRT compared to VMAT. Median beam-on time for mcfSRT was 9.7 min per fraction, compared to 0.9 min for VMAT (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

mcfSRT plans achieve equivalent target volume coverage, improved conformity and gradient indices, and reduced radiation doses to organs at risk as compared with VMAT plans. These results suggest superior dosimetric parameters for mcfSRT plans and can form the basis for future prospective studies.

Assessment of intra-fraction motion during frameless image guided Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery

As frameless stereotactic radiosurgery increase in use, the aim of this study was to evaluate intra-fraction motion through cone-beam CT (CBCT) and high-definition motion management (HDMM) systems. Intra-fraction motion measured between localization, repeat localization and post-treatment CBCTs were correlated to intra-faction motion indicated by the HDMM files using the Pearson coefficient (r). A total of 302 plans were reviewed from 263 patients (114 male, 149 female); 216 pairs of localization-repeat localization, and 260 localization-post-treatment CBCTs were analyzed against HDMM logs. We found the magnitude of intra-fraction motion detected by the HDMM system were larger than the corresponding CBCT results.

Optimal mask fixation method for frameless radiosurgery with Leksell Gamma Knife IconTM

The Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK) Icon^TM is used for mask-based and frame-based fixation. The mask fixation provides a noninvasive method. However, an optimal mask fixation method is yet to be established. We evaluated the characteristics of three mask fixation methods (Plain, Folded, and Wide) for the LGK Icon^TM . Force-sensitive resistor sensors were attached to the forehead, supraorbital, zygoma, mandible, and occipital bone of the phantom, and digital humidity and temperature sensors were attached to both temporal lobes. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and high-definition motion management (HDMM) for each mask fixation method were used to evaluate the phantom motion during the initial application. Subsequently, the mask was removed and reapplied on the second (1st reapplication) and third days (2nd reapplication). In the initial application, forces acting on most portions of the phantom were stabilized within 1.5 h. The largest force acted on the occipital bone for the Plain and Wide methods and on the mandible for the Folded method. The temperature rapidly approaches the initial temperature, whereas the humidity gradually approached the initial humidity in all fixation methods. The Folded method exhibited a significantly lower translation along the Y-axis of the Leksell coordinate system, and rotations along all axes were under 0.5°. The HDMM values remained at 0.1 mm for all fixation methods. In the reapplications, the force acting on the occipital bone was significantly greater than that during the initial application for all mask fixation methods; the temperature and humidity remained unchanged. All mask fixation methods in the 1st reapplication were not significantly different from those in the 2nd reapplication. The Folded method is recommended as an optimal mask fixation for patients who require tight fixation; the Wide method can be considered if patient comfort is a priority.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery - 12 years of experience in a high-complexity center of a middle-income country

Background

Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKR) is a technique that consists of the release of a high dose of ionizing radiation onto a therapeutic target, which has been previously delimited. This technique was described by Lars Leksell and Borje Larsson in 1951. In Colombia, there is only one GKR unit functioning machine nowadays. The objective of this study is to describe the institutional experience of a single institution with Gamma Knife Perfexion over 12 years.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study. A total of 1906 medical records, taken from the period between May 4, 2010, and May 4, 2022, were included in the study. Descriptive analysis was performed through STATA 17 as statistic tool. Measures of central tendency were calculated depending on the distribution of the continuous data and proportions were taken into account in the case of qualitative variables.

Results

A total of 1906 procedures were performed. Patients from 1 year to 99 years old were treated, with a median age of 51 years. The most frequent diagnoses were meningioma (20.8%), arteriovenous malformation (AVM) (17%), vestibular schwannoma (15.6%), metastases (9.81%), and trigeminal neuralgia (9.12%). At 3-year posttreatment, in meningiomas, tumor size stability was observed in 57.3%, size decrease in 36%, and disappearance in 1.3%. In AVM, complete obliteration of the lesion was described in 36.8% and a decrease in size in 52.6%. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5.2% during the follow-up period and 3.5% of all treated patients required a new procedure due to residual malformation. In vestibular schwannomas, tumor size remained stable in 62.2% and decreased in 28.8%. No new cases of facial paralysis after the procedure were described. At 1-year posttreatment, in metastasis, the size of the lesions remained stable in 40% of the patients, decreased in 47.5%, and disappeared in 2.5%. In trigeminal neuralgia, 88.4% of patients had pain relief and recurrences occurred in 16.6%. Acute complications were generally uncommon, the main ones being headache, pain at frame fixation points, and nausea.

Conclusion

Our experience suggests that GKR is a noninvasive procedure with a broad spectrum of clinical applications, low frequency of complications, feasible, with good enough control size of tumor and vascular lesions in images, and good clinical results in the medium and long term.

Feasibility of fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of newly diagnosed Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with overall survival remaining poor despite ongoing efforts to explore new treatment paradigms. Given these outcomes, efforts have been made to shorten treatment time. Recent data report on the safety of CyberKnife (CK) fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of GBM using a five-fraction regimen. The latest Gamma Knife (GK) model also supports frameless SRS, and outcomes using GK SRS in the management of primary GBM have not yet been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To report on the feasibility of five-fraction SRS with the GammaKnife ICON in the management of newly diagnosed GBM.

METHODS

In this single institutional study, we retrospectively reviewed all patients from our medical center from January 2017 through December 2021 who received fractionated SRS with Gamma Knife ICON for newly diagnosed GBM. Patient demographics, upfront surgical margins, molecular subtyping, radiation treatment volumes, systemic therapies, and follow-up imaging findings were extracted to report on oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified six patients treated within the above time frame. Median age at diagnosis was 73.5 years, 66% were male, and had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of 70. All tumors were IDH wild-type, and all but one were MGMT methylated and received concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). Within this group, progression free survival was comparable to that of historical data without significant radiation-induced toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Gamma Knife ICON may be discussed as a potential treatment option for select GBM patients and warrants further investigation in the prospective setting.

Retrospective Analysis of Treatment Workflow in Frame-Based and Frameless Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Objective

To improve the efficiency of frame-based and frameless Gamma Knife® Icon™ (GKI) treatments by analyzing the workflows of both treatment approaches and identifying steps that lead to prolonged patient in-clinic or treatment time.

Methods

The treatment processes of 57 GKI patients, 16 frame-based and 41 frameless cases were recorded and analyzed. For frame-based treatments, time points were recorded for various steps in the process, including check-in, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) completion, plan approval, and treatment start/end times. The time required for completing each step was calculated and investigated. For frameless treatments, the actual and planned treatment times were compared to evaluate the patient tolerance of the treatment. In addition, the time spent on room cleaning and preparation between treatments was also recorded and analyzed.

Results

For frame-based cases, the average in-clinic time was 6.3 hours (ranging from 4 to 8.7 hours). The average time from patient check-in to plan approval was 4.2 hours (ranging from 2.8 to 5.5 hours), during which the frame was placed, stereotactic reference MRI images were taken, target volumes were contoured, and the treatment plan was developed and second-checked. For patients immobilized with a mask, treatment pauses triggered by the intra-fractional motion monitoring system resulted in a significantly longer actual treatment time than the planned time. In 50 (or 55%) of the 91 frameless treatments, the patient on-table time was longer than the planned treatment time by more than 10 minutes, and in 19 (or 21%) of the treatments the time difference was larger than 20 minutes. Major treatment interruptions, defined as pauses leading to a longer than 10-minute delay, were more commonly encountered in patients with a planned treatment time longer than 40 minutes, which accounted for 64% of the recorded major interruptions.

Conclusion

For frame-based cases, the multiple pretreatment steps (from patient check-in to plan approval) in the workflow were time-consuming and resulted in prolonged patient in-clinic time. These pretreatment steps may be shortened by performing some of these steps before the treatment day, e.g., pre-planning the treatment using diagnostic MRI scans acquired a few days earlier. For frameless patients, we found that a longer planned treatment time is associated with a higher chance of treatment interruption. For patients with a long treatment time, a planned break or consideration of fractionated treatments (i.e., 3 to 5 fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery) may optimize the workflow and improve patient satisfaction.

Zero Setup Margin Mask versus Frame Immobilization during Gamma Knife® Icon™ Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

We compared the clinical outcomes of BM treated with mask immobilization with zero-SM (i.e., zero-PTV) to standard zero-SM frame immobilization SRS. Consecutive patients with BM, 0.5−2.0 cm in maximal diameter, treated with single-fraction SRS (22−24 Gy) during March 2019−February 2021 were included. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed using the Kaplan−Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 150 patients with 453 BM met inclusion criteria. A total of 129 (28.5%) lesions were treated with a zero-SM mask immobilization and 324 (71.5%) with zero-SM frame immobilization. Frame immobilization treatments were associated with a higher proportion of gastrointestinal and fewer breast-cancer metastases (p = 0.024), and a higher number of treated lesions per SRS course (median 7 vs. 3; p < 0.001). With a median follow up of 15 months, there was no difference in FFLF between the mask and frame immobilization groups on univariable (p = 0.29) or multivariable analysis (p = 0.518). Actuarial FFLF at 1 year was 90.5% for mask and 92% for frame immobilization (p = 0.272). Radiation necrosis rates at 1 year were 12.5% for mask and 4.1% for frame immobilization (p = 0.502). For BM 0.5−2.0 cm in maximal diameter treated with single-fraction SRS using 22−24 Gy, mask immobilization with zero SM produces comparable clinical outcomes to frame immobilization. The initial findings support omitting a SM when using mask immobilization with this treatment approach on a Gamma Knife® Icon™.

Health related quality of life trajectories after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is often used as an outcome measure of cancer treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a mainstay treatment of brain metastases (BMs) with constantly improving treatment envelope. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluated HRQoL trajectories after SRS, identify important predictors of HRQoL after SRS, and to evaluate clinical importance of post-SRS HRQoL trajectories of BM patients treated with SRS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review according to the PRISMA guidelines analyzing HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BM published in the Pubmed/MEDLINE database before January, 2022.

RESULTS

We identified 18 studies that evaluated HRQoL before and at least once after SRS for BMs. The majority of studies were single-institution retrospective series and included patients with different cancer types. Different instruments were used to assess HRQoL. In the majority of studies (n = 10) at group level, there was no significant change in global HRQoL after SRS. Stability, improvement, and deterioration of HRQoL global and subscale scores at individual patient level were common. Post-SRS HRQoL deterioration was predicted by worse functional status, greater number of BMs, delayed SRS, symptomatic BMs, and presence of seizures and cognitive impairment. Shorter post-SRS survival and adverse radiation effects (AREs) were associated with worse HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS for BMs is often associated with sustained preservation of HRQoL. Individual variation of HRQoL domains after SRS is common. Shorter survival and AREs are associated with worse HRQoL. Worse functional status and greater disease burden predict unfavorable HRQoL trajectories after SRS for BMs.

Quantifying the sensitivity of target dose on intra-fraction displacement in intra-cranial stereotactic radiosurgery

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Mask-immobilized stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a gating window is an emerging technology. However, the amount of intracranial tumor motion that can be tolerated during treatment while satisfying clinical dosimetric goals is unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantify the sensitivity of target dose to tumor motion.

METHODS

In clinical SRS plans, where a nose marker was tracked as surrogate for target motion, translational and rotational target movements were simulated using nose-marker displacements of ±0.5mm, ±1.0mm or ±1.5mm. The effect on minimum dose to 99% of the target (D₉₉) and percent target coverage by prescription dose was quantified using mixed-effect modelling with variables: displacement, target volume and location.

RESULTS

The effect on dose metrics is statistically larger for translational displacements compared to rotational displacements, and the effect of pitch rotations is statistically larger compared to yaw rotations. The mixed-effect model for translations showed that displacement and target volume are statistically significant variables, for rotation the variable target distance to rotation axis is additionally significant. For mean target volume (12.6cc) and translational nose-marker displacements of 0.5mm, 1.0mm, and 1.5mm, D₉₉ decreased by 2.2%, 7.1% and 13.0%, and coverage by 0.4%, 1.8% and 4.4%, respectively. For mean target volume, mean distance midpoint-target to pitch axis (7.6cm), and rotational nose-marker displacement of 0.5mm, 1.0mm, and 1.5mm, D₉₉ decreased by 1.0%, 3.6% and 6.9%, and coverage by 0.2%, 0.8% and 1.9%, respectively. For rotational yaw axis displacement, mean distance midpoint-target axis (4.2cm), D₉₉ decreased by 0.3%, 1.2% and 2.5%, and coverage by 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Simulated target displacements showed that sensitivity of tumor dose to motion depends on both target volume and target location. Suggesting that patient- and target-specific thresholds may be implemented for optimizing the balance between dosimetric plan accuracy and treatment prolongation caused by out-of-tolerance motion.

Systematic evaluation and plan quality assessment of the Leksell® gamma knife® lightning dose optimizer

To compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan quality metrics of manual forward planning (MFP) and Elekta Fast Inverse Planning™ (FIP)-based inversely optimized plans for patients treated with Gamma Knife®. Clinically treated, MFP SRS plans for 100 consecutive patients (115 lesions; 67 metastatic and 48 benign) were replanned with the FIP dose optimizer based on a convex linear programming formulation. Comparative plans were generated to match or exceed the following metrics in order of importance: Target Coverage (TC), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), beam-on time (BOT), and Gradient Index (GI). Plan quality metrics and delivery parameters between MFP and FIP were compared for all lesions and stratified into subgroups for further analysis. Additionally, performance of FIP for multiple punctate (<4 mm) metastatic lesions on a subset of cases was investigated. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-normal distributions was used to assess the statistical differences between the MFP and FIP treatment plans. Overall, 76% (87/115) of FIP plans showed a statistically significant improvement in plan quality compared to MFP plans. As compared to MFP, FIP plans demonstrated an increase in the median PCI by 1.1% (p<0.01), a decrease in GI by 3.7% (p< 0.01), and an increase in median number of shots by 74% (p< 0.01). TC and BOT were not statistically significantly different between MFP and FIP plans (p>0.05). FIP plans showed a statistically significant increase in use of 16 mm (p< 0.01) and blocked shots (p< 0.01), with a corresponding decrease in 4 mm shots (p< 0.01). Use of multiple shots per coordinate was significantly higher in FIP plans (p<0.01). The FIP optimizer failed to generate a clinically acceptable plan in 4/115 (3.5%) lesions despite optimization parameter changes. The mean optimization time for FIP plans was 5.0 min (Range: 1.0 - 10.0 min). In the setting of multiple punctate lesions, PCI for FIP was significantly improved (p<0.01) by changing the default low-dose/BOT penalty optimization setting from a default of 50/50 to 75-85/40. FIP offers a significant reduction in manual effort for SRS treatment planning while achieving comparable plan quality to an expert planner-substantially improving overall planning efficiency. FIP plans employ a non-intuitive increased use of blocked sectors and shot-in-shot technique to achieve high quality plans. Several FIP plans failed to achieve clinically acceptable treatments and warrant further investigation.

Pituitary Surgery

Surgery, more specifically transsphenoidal approach, remains the primary treatment chosen for the majority of pituitary tumors (except for prolactinomas where medical treatment is indicated) allowing for pathologic analysis and complete or partial tumor removal. Transcranial approaches, employing craniotomies, are still needed in some patients with giant pituitary adenomas and in many of those harboring craniopharyngiomas. However, the surgical treatment of pituitary tumors is challenging because of their complex anatomical location and their heterogenous histology. Due to the proximity of critical structures, a successful surgical procedure may often not be achievable due to the high risks related to the procedure itself. Therefore, the treatment of pituitary tumors in 2020 commonly requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, radiosurgery, radiation therapy, and medical therapy. Recently, efforts have been made to develop intraoperative imaging, by increasing the diffusion of radiosurgery. Furthermore, the development of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE) is becoming crucial to provide the optimal treatment for a single patient. There is in fact sufficient evidence that the best and optimal outcome in terms of tumor resection and correction of hormonal over secretion as well as the lowest rate of complications are obtained in centers of excellence with sufficiently experienced, specialized surgeons and a high patient load. Technological developments will probably even gain increasing importance in the future.

Single Fraction Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery on the Gamma Knife Icon for Patients With Brain Metastases: Time to Abandon the Frame?

Purpose

The latest version of the Gamma Knife, the Icon, allows for immobilization with a mask in lieu of the traditional frame during stereotactic radiosurgery. There have been some concerns regarding extent of immobilization during single fraction frameless treatment and potential effect on outcomes. As such, we reviewed outcomes in patients with brain metastases treated in a single fraction using either a frame or mask on the Gamma Knife Icon at our institution.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the records of 95 patients with a total of 374 metastases treated between May 2019 and January 2021. Thirty-nine patients (41%) were treated using the Leksell frame with the remainder being immobilized with a mask. The median number of metastatic lesions was 2 (1–20). The median prescription dose was 20 Gy (11.5–24 Gy). Odds ratios were generated to identify predictors of mask use. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival, local failure, and distant failure rates. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival. Propensity matching was used to account for indication bias.

Results

Of the 95 patients treated, 88 (93%) had follow-up with a median duration of 5 months (1–18). Frame utilization was more likely with 6 to 10 brain metastases. Median overall survival was not reached and was 70% and 60% at 6 and 12 months for the entire cohort, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival by immobilization method (P = .12). Six patients had local failure in 10 total lesions (3 patients in each group). After propensity matching the 12 month tumor local control was 96% and 85% for framed and frameless cases, respectively (P = .07).

Conclusions

Frameless mask-based stereotactic radiosurgery using the Gamma Knife Icon is feasible and maintains the excellent local control seen with the use of the headframe.

Integration of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

In the multi-modal treatment of brain metastasis (BM), the role of systemic therapy has undergone a recent revolution. Due to the development of multiple agents with modest central nervous system penetration of the blood-brain barrier, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being utilized alone or in combination with radiation therapy. However, the adoption of sequential or concurrent strategies varies considerably, and treatment strategies employed in clinical practice have rapidly outpaced evidence development. Therefore, this review critically analyzes the data regarding combinatorial approaches for a variety of systemic therapeutics with stereotactic radiosurgery and provides an overview of ongoing clinical trials.

Abstract

Brain metastasis (BM) represents a common complication of cancer, and in the modern era requires multi-modal management approaches and multi-disciplinary care. Traditionally, due to the limited efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, treatment strategies are focused on local treatments alone, such as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and resection. However, the increased availability of molecular-based therapies with central nervous system (CNS) penetration now permits the individualized selection of tailored systemic therapies to be used alongside local treatments. Moreover, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with demonstrated CNS activity has further revolutionized the management of BM patients. The rapid introduction of these cancer therapeutics into clinical practice, however, has led to a significant dearth in the published literature about the optimal timing, sequencing, and combination of these systemic therapies along with SRS. This manuscript reviews the impact of tumor biology and molecular profiles on the management paradigm for BM patients and critically analyzes the current landscape of SRS, with a specific focus on integration with systemic therapy. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies combining SRS and ICIs, the impact of timing and the sequencing of these therapies around SRS, the effect of corticosteroids, and review post-treatment imaging findings, including pseudo-progression and radiation necrosis.

Frame-Based and Mask-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The Patient Experience, Compared

INTRODUCTION

Noninvasive frameless modalities have become increasingly utilized for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign and malignant pathologies. There is minimal comparison in the literature of frame-based (FB) and mask-based (MB) SRS. With the dual capabilities of the Elekta Gamma Knife® Icon™, we sought to compare patient perceptions of FB and MB SRS with respect to comfort and pain and to examine effects of lesion type on the patient experience of SRS.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, patients who underwent single fraction, fractionated or hypofractionated FB or MB Gamma Knife SRS at our institution were given an 8-question survey about their experience with the procedure immediately after treatment was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients completed the survey with 65 FB and 52 MB SRS treatments. Mean pain for FB SRS (5.64 ± 2.55) was significantly greater than mean pain for MB SRS (0.92 ± 2.24; t114 = 10.46, p < 0.001). Patient comfort during the procedure was also higher for those having MB SRS (p < 0.001). Mixed results were obtained when investigating if benign versus malignant diagnosis affected patient experience of SRS. For the purposes of this study, malignant diagnoses were almost entirely metastatic lesions. Diagnosis played no role on pain levels when all patients were analyzed together. The treatment technique had no effect on patient comfort in patients with benign diagnoses, while patients with malignant diagnoses treated with MB SRS were more likely to be comfortable (p < 0.001). Among patient's receiving FB treatments, diagnosis played no role on patient comfort. When only MB treatments were analyzed, patients were more likely to be comfortable if they had a malignant lesion (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with MB SRS experience the procedure as more comfortable and less painful compared to those treated using a FB modality. Overall, this difference was not affected by a benign versus a malignant diagnosis and the treatment type is more indicative of the patient experience during SRS. A more homogenous sample between modalities and diagnoses and further follow-up with the patient's input on their experience would be beneficial.

Mask-based immobilization in Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery

The Gamma Knife Icon (Elekta AB, Stockholm) is a cobalt-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) unit to support the use of a thermoplastic mask in lieu of a rigid frame, using an onboard cone-beam CT (CBCT) and an intrafraction motion management system (IFMM). We retrospectively reviewed 124 patients treated with Gamma Knife SRS from January 2018 to December 2019 at our institution using a mask-based immobilization system. Patient and treatment characteristics were collected and summarized as well as interfraction shifts and treatment-related outcomes. This dataset includes 124 patients with an associated 358 intracranial tumors. Twenty-four patients presented with primary brain tumors, which included 14 meningiomas and 10 other histologies, with 100 patients having brain metastases. Sixty tumors were post-operative, while 298 were intact. The median dose for primary tumors was 25 Gy in 5 fractions. Median doses to metastases were 20 Gy in 1 fraction, 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and 25 Gy in 5 fractions. Median interfraction CBCT shifts were submillimeter. Median patient follow-up was 6.28 months. 91% of patients with metastases maintained local control. Our early clinical experience has demonstrated limited toxicity profiles and high patient tolerance, which suggests that mask-based Gamma Knife SRS provides a safe alternative option for frameless SRS. Patients with large target volumes where fractionation is preferred or with small target volumes in non-eloquent areas can be considered for this approach. Response rates are encouraging, and continued follow-up is necessary to investigate long-term control and survival.

Predictors of Treatment Interruption During Frameless Gamma Knife Icon Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

The Gamma Knife (GK) Icon allows for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery using a thermoplastic mask in combination with intrafraction motion monitoring using high definition motion management. The system pauses treatment if the magnitude of motion in all directions exceeds 1 to 1.5 mm, causing a break in treatment and prolongation of the session. We reviewed the records of patients treated in a frameless manner on our GK Icon system to determine predictors for treatment interruption.

Methods and Materials

We reviewed the records of patients treated between May 2019 and May 2020 on the GK Icon using a frameless technique for brain metastases, gliomas, schwannomas, and meningiomas. We recorded treatment time as noted in the plan document, actual treatment delivery time, and any pauses in treatment. We tabulated baseline characteristics including age, gender, diagnosis, performance status, and shifts at time of treatment. We used a receiver operating curve analysis to determine a timepoint corresponding with treatment interruption. We then conducted a logistic regression analysis to generate odds ratios for likelihood of treatment.

Results

We identified 150 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The majority (82%) were patients with brain metastases. The median age was 63 and the median dose was 27 Gy (16-30 Gy) in 3 fractions (1-5 fractions). The median treatment time was 23 minutes (4-108 minutes). Sixty-nine patients (46%) had at least 1 pause in treatment (range, 1-7). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed treatment time >19 minutes and rotation >0.47 degrees to be associated with interruption. Multivariable logistic regression revealed rotation >0.47 degrees and treatment time >19 minutes as predictive of interruption.

Conclusions

For patients with rotations exceeding 0.47 degrees or an extended treatment time, physicians should expect treatment interruptions, consider fractionation to lessen table time, or use a frame-based approach.

Selection of single-isocenter for multiple-target stereotactic brain radiosurgery to minimize total margin volume

Treating multiple brain metastases with a single isocenter improves efficiency but requires margins to account for rotation induced shifts that increase with target-to-isocenter distance. A method to select the single isocenter position that minimizes the total volume of normal tissue treated during multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is presented. A statistical framework was developed to quantify the impact of uncertainties on planning target volumes (PTV). Translational and rotational shifts were modeled with independent, zero mean, Gaussian distributions in three dimensions added in quadrature. The standard deviations of errors were varied from 0.5-2.0 mm and 0.5°-2.0°. The volume of normal tissue treated due to margin expansions required to maintain a 95% probability of target coverage was computed. Tumors were modeled as 4-40 mm diameter spheres. Target separation distance was varied from 40-100 mm for two- and three-lesion scenarios. The percent increase in PTV was determined relative to an isocenter at the geometric centroid of the targets for the optimal isocenter that minimized the total normal tissue treated, and isocenters at the center-of-mass (COM) and center-of-surface-area (CSA). For two targets, isocenter placement at the optimal location, COM, and CSA, reduced the total margin versus an isocenter at midline up to 17.8%, 17.7%, and 17.8%, respectively, for 0.5 mm and 0.5° errors. For three targets, optimal isocenter placement reduced the margin volume up to 21%, 19%, and 14%, for uncertainties of (0.5 mm, 0.5°), (1.0 mm, 1.0°), and (2.0 mm, 2.0°), respectively. COM and CSA provide useful approximations to select the optimal isocenter for multi-target single-isocenter SRS for two or three targets with maximum dimensions ⩽ 40 mm and separation distances ⩽ 100 mm when uncertainties are ⩽ 1.0 mm and ⩽ 1.0°. CSA provides a more accurate approximation than COM. Optimal treatment isocenter selection for multiple targets of large size differences can significantly reduce total margin volume.

Progressive Vestibular Schwannoma following Subtotal or Near-Total Resection: Dose-Escalated versus Standard-Dose Salvage Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Objective  Local failure of incompletely resected vestibular schwannoma (VS) following salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using standard doses of 12 to 13 Gy is common. We hypothesized that dose-escalated SRS, corrected for biologically effective dose, would have superior local control of high-grade VS progressing after subtotal or near-total resection compared with standard-dose SRS. Design  Retrospective cohort study. Setting  Tertiary academic referral center. Participants  Adult patients treated with linear accelerator-based SRS for progressive VS following subtotal or near-total resection. Main Outcome Measures  Dose-escalated SRS was defined by a biologically effective dose exceeding a single-fraction 13-Gy regimen. Study outcomes were local control and neurologic sequelae of SRS. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of study outcomes. Results  A total of 18 patients with progressive disease following subtotal (71%) and near-total (39%) resection of Koos grade IV disease (94%) were enrolled. Of the 18 patients, 7 were treated with dose-escalated SRS and 11 with standard-dose SRS. Over a median follow-up of 32 months after SRS, local control was 100% in the dose-escalated cohort and 91% in the standard-dose cohort ( p  = 0.95). Neurologic sequelae occurred in 28% of patients, including 60% of dose-escalated cohort and 40% of the standard-dose cohort ( p  = 0.12), although permanent neurologic sequelae were low at 6%. Conclusions  Dose-escalated SRS has similar local control of recurrent VS following progression after subtotal or near-total resection and does not appear to have higher neurologic sequalae. Larger studies are needed.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for management of vestibular schwannoma: a short review

Management options for newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma (VS) include observation, surgery, or radiation. There are no randomized trials to guide management of patients with VS. This article is a short review of the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in management of newly diagnosed VS.

Radiotherapy of Parasellar Tumours

Parasellar tumours represent a wide group of intracranial lesions, both benign and malignant. They may arise from several structures located within the parasellar area or they may infiltrate or metastasize this region. The treatment of the tumours located in these areas is challenging because of their complex anatomical location and their heterogenous histology. It often requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and medical therapy. Due to the proximity of critical structures and the risks of side effects related to the procedure, a successful surgical resection is often not achievable. Thus, RT plays a crucial role in the treatment of several parasellar tumours. Conventional fractionated RT and modern radiation techniques, like stereotactic radiosurgery and proton beam RT, have become a standard management option, in particular for cases with residual or recurrent tumours after surgery and for those cases where surgery is contraindicated. This review examines the role of RT in parasellar tumours analysing several techniques, outcomes and side effects.

One-Day Two-Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases Using Gamma Knife

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a one-day two-fraction Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for brain metastases.

CASES AND METHODS

Ten cases with ten brain metastases (four cases of lung adenocarcinoma, one small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), two renal cell carcinoma, one breast cancer, one esophageal carcinoma, and one bile duct carcinoma) were treated by one-day two-fraction (with an interval of more than six hours) GKRS under rigid skull frame fixation. Of the ten brain metastases, five lesions were in the frontal lobe, one in temporal, one in occipital, and three in the cerebellar hemisphere. The mean planning target volume (PTV) of the ten brain tumors was 7.8 ml (median, 8.0; range, 3.8 - 11.8). The ten targets of the mean prescription isodose volume (PIV) of 10.1 ml (median, 10.1; range, 4.4 - 15.9) were treated with a mean margin dose of 20.4 Gy (median, 20.5; range, 16.4 - 22) in two fractions. In five cases, other small brain metastases (one to seven tumors) were also treated simultaneously in a single fraction GKRS. The indication of two-fraction radiosurgery was large lesion size in eight, retreatment in three, the proximity of the motor area in three, and pre-existing perifocal edema symptom of dysarthria in two, nausea and vomiting in one, and dementia in one.

RESULTS

Eight cases were alive at the end of the follow-up period of one to nine months (median, 6). One patient with SCLC died four and a half months after GKRS, from aggressive regrowth of the treated frontal lesion after transient marked shrinkage. Another patient died four months after GKRS due to the progression of other brain tumors treated by single fraction GKRS at the same time. In nine of 10 cases, the size of the treated tumors was controlled until the end of the follow-up period or the patient's death. In two cases, an additional GKRS was performed for newly developed brain metastases at distant locations at six months and five months after one-day two-fraction GKRS, respectively, and controlled at the end of the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high dose may be safely delivered to large lesions, to those close to the important structures, or those with perifocal edema by one-day two-fraction radiosurgery. Local control was good except for a relapsed SCLC metastasis case. Evaluation in more cases with a longer follow-up period is necessary to determine definite indications and optimal prescription doses.