Nicotine Standards in the United States

Determinants of Hardcore Smoking in a MULTI-ETHNIC Study of Cigarette Smokers in Singapore

Smokers who are resistant to quitting are not well studied in Asia, particularly in multi-ethnic populations. We compared the characteristics of hardcore smokers in Singapore, a multi-ethnic Asian population, with other daily smokers, and investigated the role of ethnicity as an effect modifier on identified determinants, including cigarette flavor preferences, using cross-sectional data from Singapore Smokers' Survey (n = 1,501). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association. 22.8% of adult daily smokers were hardcore smokers. Novel findings on hardcore smokers' preference for regular flavored cigarettes (AOR = 1.54; 95%CI: 1.14, 2.07) suggest there is room for interventions among hardcore smokers through regulation of cigarette flavors and nicotine content. Although ethnicity was not a significant factor, it was an effect modifier with peers' disapproval of smoking (p-value for interaction = 0.024), significantly lowering odds of Malays being hardcore smokers (stratified odds ratio, AOR stratified, Malay = 0.35; CI: 0.17, 0.71), but not Chinese (AOR stratified, Chinese = 1.27; CI: 0.70, 2.42) and Indian smokers (AOR stratified, Indian = 0.62; CI: 0.18, 2.28), suggesting that smoking cessation policies utilizing social norm change strategies may be more effective when tailored to the differing roles of peer norms among different ethnic groups, in Singapore and other multi-ethnic Asian populations.

A review of the evidence on cigarettes with reduced addictiveness potential

Background

In May 2018, the Secretariat for the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control convened a meeting to discuss the potential for reducing the addictiveness of tobacco products. A central focus was to review research findings on the behavioral effects of reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes.

Methods

This manuscript reports the results of a review of the behavioral science literature, updated through April 2021, with special attention to both the potential benefits and unintended consequences of reducing nicotine in cigarettes.

Results

Available evidence suggests that reducing nicotine content in cigarettes to very low levels could benefit public health in three primary ways, by 1) decreasing uptake of regular smoking, 2) decreasing the amount people smoke, and 3) increasing the likelihood of smoking cessation. Current evidence also suggests that reducing nicotine in cigarettes may produce similar benefits across many important subpopulations of people who smoke, including those with psychiatric comorbidities, those who use other substances, those with low socioeconomic status, young people, people who smoke infrequently and people who prefer menthol cigarettes. Cigarette nicotine reduction could also lead to some undesirable outcomes, such as experiencing withdrawal, product manipulation, an illicit market, and harm misperceptions; strategies that may mitigate each are discussed.

Conclusion

Overall, behavioral research suggests product standards that limit the nicotine content of combusted tobacco products could render cigarettes and similar products less addictive. The availability of legal, non-combusted products that effectively substitute for cigarettes and the dissemination of public health campaigns that clarify misperceptions about the relationship between nicotine, tobacco and disease may facilitate the extent to which a nicotine reduction policy reduces smoking.

Effects of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes Across Regulatory Environments in the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace: A Randomized Trial

INTRODUCTION

Cigarette smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death in the United States. Recent efforts have explored the potential health and policy benefits of reducing nicotine, an addictive component, in combustible cigarettes. To date, an experimental, prospective analysis directly comparing the effects of varying regulatory environments on purchases of multiple products has yet to be conducted. The present study compared real purchasing of conventional cigarettes, reduced-nicotine cigarettes, and a variety of other nicotine and tobacco products across a range of regulatory environments.

METHODS

Participants were assigned to one of five groups, each associated with a different nicotine level (mg of nicotine to g of tobacco) in SPECTRUM investigational cigarettes (15.8, 5.2, 2.4, 1.3, and 0.4 mg/g). Across sessions, participants made real purchases for nicotine/tobacco products in an Experimental Tobacco Marketplace. Each session corresponded with a distinct regulatory environment wherein different nicotine/tobacco products were available for purchase.

RESULTS

Our results suggest that the primary drivers of cigarette and nicotine purchasing are regulatory environment and the presence/absence of alternative nicotine and tobacco products. Perhaps surprisingly, nicotine level does not appear to be such a driver of purchasing behavior under these experimental conditions. Investigational cigarette purchasing is lowest when other preferred combustible products are available and highest when investigational cigarettes are the only combustible product available for purchase.

CONCLUSIONS

If a reduced-nicotine policy is implemented, great care should be taken in determining and making available less-harmful nicotine/tobacco products as the availability of preferred combustible products may result in undesirable levels of purchasing.

IMPLICATIONS

This is the first experimental study investigating different potential regulatory effects related to a reduced-nicotine policy by examining purchasing across a range of nicotine/tobacco products. Our results suggest the presence of affordable, highly preferred combustible products is likely to maintain tobacco purchasing at undesirable levels. To promote switching to less-harmful products, affordable alternate nicotine and tobacco products should be readily available. Finally, our results suggest that the availability of noncigarette products, not cigarette nicotine level, will most likely affect purchasing of reduced-nicotine cigarettes.