Evaluation of Renal Safety Between Imipenem/Relebactam and Colistin Plus Imipenem in Patients With Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections in the Randomized, Phase 3 RESTORE-IMI 1 Study

First case report of a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae treated with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam prolonged infusion then meropenem/vaborbactam in continuous infusion

Introduction

Bone and joint infections (BJIs) caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria are becoming more frequent. However, data on the use of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, such as imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I-R) and meropenem/vaborbactam (MVB), to treat BJIs is lacking. Furthermore, prolonged infusions of these β-lactams should theoretically optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics target in these indications, but there are currently no reports on this type of infusions, especially in the setting of BJI.

Case Presentation

We report a case of a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae successfully treated with extended-infusion of I-R (1.25 g q6h over 2 h), then with continuous infusion of MVB (2 g q4h as over 4 h). Therapeutic drug monitoring confirmed that extended-infusion of I-R and continuous infusion of MVB achieved serum concentrations up to 12 mg/L of imipenem and 19 mg/L of meropenem, respectively.

Conclusion

The favourable outcome of this patient treated for a vertebral osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant E. cloacae suggest that extended- and continuous infusions of I-R and MVB, are promising regimens for treatment of BJIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Role of β-Lactamase Inhibitors as Potentiators in Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Targeting Gram-Negative Bacteria

Since the discovery of penicillin, β-lactam antibiotics have commonly been used to treat bacterial infections. Unfortunately, at the same time, pathogens can develop resistance to β-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams, and carbapenems by producing β-lactamases. Therefore, a combination of β-lactam antibiotics with β-lactamase inhibitors has been a promising approach to controlling β-lactam-resistant bacteria. The discovery of novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) is essential for effectively treating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. Therefore, this review discusses the development of innovative inhibitors meant to enhance the activity of β-lactam antibiotics. Specifically, this review describes the classification and characteristics of different classes of β-lactamases and the synergistic mechanisms of β-lactams and BLIs. In addition, we introduce potential sources of compounds for use as novel BLIs. This provides insights into overcoming current challenges in β-lactamase-producing bacteria and designing effective treatment options in combination with BLIs.

Efficacy of Intravenous Colistin Monotherapy Versus Colistin Combined With Meropenem in Patients With Multidrug-Resistant Infections: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background Intensive care units frequently contend with infections caused by highly drug-resistant organisms, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE), which often lead to high mortality rates. Colistin (colomycin) is employed to treat infections, notably extremely drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria. Antibiotic combination treatment is a frequently used tactic in this endeavour. However, the widespread use of antibiotics in synergy could result in the emergence of resistance and a rise in side effects, such as those linked to Clostridium difficile infection. The aim of the study was to assess and contrast the clinical results of intravenous colistin monotherapy with the combination of colistin and meropenem in patients experiencing MDR bacteremia resulting from Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE). Methods In this retrospective observational study, an analysis spanning two years, from June 2021 to June 2023, was conducted at a teaching hospital located in Karachi, Pakistan. The research involved the retrospective examination of medical records from 132 patients who had been diagnosed with MDR bacteremia. Patients were divided into two categories based on their treatment regimen, either intravenous colistin monotherapy or intravenous colistin combined with meropenem. Among the 132 patients included in the analysis, 66 underwent colistin monotherapy, while the other 66 received a combination of colistin and meropenem. The primary focus of evaluation in this study centered on the 14-day all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes encompassed clinical success and microbiologic cure. Results The mean age of patients in both groups was comparable, and there were no noteworthy gender differences. Additionally, the distribution of infection types and the isolated pathogens showed no substantial distinctions between the two groups. The study revealed no statistically significant disparities in 14-day mortality, improvement in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, or the proportion of patients who were cured and survived between the two treatment groups. Conclusion The findings from this study lead to the conclusion that there exists no significant disparity in the efficacy of colistin monotherapy compared to the combination of colistin with meropenem in the treatment of MDR bacteremia stemming from Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE). The results provide a basis for future research and underscore the significance of ongoing endeavors to refine antibiotic treatment strategies in response to the worldwide issue of antibiotic resistance.

Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterial Agents in the Elderly: The Body of Evidence

Infections are important factors contributing to the morbidity and mortality among elderly patients. High rates of consumption of antimicrobial agents by the elderly may result in increased risk of toxic reactions, deteriorating functions of various organs and systems and leading to the prolongation of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, disability, and lethal outcome. Both safety and efficacy of antibiotics are determined by the values of their plasma concentrations, widely affected by physiologic and pathologic age-related changes specific for the elderly population. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion are altered in different extents depending on functional and morphological changes in the cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal tract, liver, and kidneys. Water and fat content, skeletal muscle mass, nutritional status, use of concomitant drugs are other determinants of pharmacokinetics changes observed in the elderly. The choice of a proper dosing regimen is essential to provide effective and safe antibiotic therapy in terms of attainment of certain pharmacodynamic targets. The objective of this review is to perform a structure of evidence on the age-related changes contributing to the alteration of pharmacokinetic parameters in the elderly.

Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia and bloodstream infections (BSI) due to extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Acinetobacter baumannii, XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are associated with high mortality rates, and therapeutic options remain limited. This trial assessed whether combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of these infections.

METHODS

The OVERCOME (Colistin Monotherapy versus Combination Therapy) trial was an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We randomly assigned participants to receive colistin (5 mg/kg once followed by 1.67 mg/kg every 8 hours) in combination with either meropenem (1000 mg every 8 hours) or matching placebo for the treatment of pneumonia and/or BSI caused by XDR A. baumannii, XDR P. aeruginosa, or CRE. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included clinical failure and microbiologic cure.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2020, a total of 464 participants were randomly assigned to treatment, and 423 eligible patients comprised the modified intention-to-treat population. A. baumannii was the predominant trial pathogen (78%) and pneumonia the most common index infection (70%). Most patients were in the intensive care unit at the time of enrollment (69%). There was no difference in mortality (43 vs. 37%; P=0.17), clinical failure (65 vs. 58%; difference, 6.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 16.6), microbiologic cure (65 vs. 60%; difference, 4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.6 to 15.2), or adverse events (acute kidney injury, 52 vs. 49% [P=0.55]; hypersensitivity reaction, 1 vs. 3% [P=0.22]; and neurotoxicity, 5 vs. 2% [P=0.29]) between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with colistin and meropenem was not superior to colistin monotherapy for the treatment of pneumonia or BSI caused by these pathogens. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases protocol 10-0065; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01597973.).

Last resort beta-lactam antibiotics for treatment of New-Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase producing Enterobacterales and other Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: A real-life study

Introduction

Novel last resort beta-lactam antibiotics are now available for management of infections due to New-Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase (NDM) producing Enterobacterales and non-fermenters with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance. However, data regarding the use of imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (IMI-REL), cefiderocol (CFD) and ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam (CAZ-AVI-ATM) are scarce in real-life settings. This study aimed to describe the use of last resort beta-lactam antibiotics, the microbiology and the outcome, in patients hospitalized in a tertiary hospital.

Methods

We conducted a monocentric observational cohort study from 2020/01/01, to 2022/08/31. We screened all patients admitted to Nimes University Hospital who have received ≥ 1 dose of last resort beta-lactam antibiotics during the study period, using the Pharmacy database. We included patients treated with IMI-REL, CFD and CAZ-AVI-ATM. The primary endpoint was the infection-free survival rate. We also calculated rates of microbiological and clinical cure, recurrent infection, death and adverse events.

Results

Twenty-seven patients were included in the study and 30 treatment courses were analyzed: CFD (N=24; 80%), CAZ-AVI-ATM (N=3; 10%) and IMI-REL (N=3; 10%). Antibiotics were used in 21 males (70%) and 9 females (30%) with a median age at 65-year-old [50-73.5] and a median Charlson index at 1 [0-2]. Almost all the patients had ≥ 1 risk factor for carbapenem resistant bacteria, a half of them was hospitalized for severe COVID-19, and most of antibiotic courses (N=26; 87%) were associated with ICU admission. In the study population, the probability of infection-free survival at day-90 after last resort beta-lactam therapy initiation was 48.4% CI95% [33.2-70.5]. Clinical failure rate was at 30%, microbiological failure rate at 33% and mortality rate at 23%. Adverse events were documented in 5 antibiotic courses (17%). In details, P. aeruginosa were mainly treated with CFD and IMI-REL, S. maltophilia with CFD and CAZ-AVI-ATM, A. baumannii with CFD, and NDM producing-K. pneumoniae with CAZ-AVI-ATM and CFD. After a treatment course with CFD, CAZ-AVI-ATM and IMI-REL, the probability of infection-free survival was 48% CI95% [10.4-73.5], 33.3% CI95% [6.7-100], 66.7% CI95% [30-100], respectively.

Discussion/conclusion

Use of last resort beta-lactam antimicrobials in real-life settings was a safe and efficient therapeutic option for severe infections related to Gram-negative bacteria with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment Algorithm for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Expert Panel Opinion

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

Resistance to Ceftazidime/Avibactam, Meropenem/Vaborbactam and Imipenem/Relebactam in Gram-Negative MDR Bacilli: Molecular Mechanisms and Susceptibility Testing

Multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a serious global threat due to the rapid global spread and limited antimicrobial options for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTR) infections sustained by MDR pathogens. Recently, novel β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (βL-βLICs) have been developed for the treatment of DTR infections due to MDR Gram-negative pathogens. Although novel βL-βLICs exhibited promising in vitro and in vivo activities against MDR pathogens, emerging resistances to these novel molecules have recently been reported. Resistance to novel βL-βLICs is due to several mechanisms including porin deficiencies, increasing carbapenemase expression and/or enzyme mutations. In this review, we summarized the main mechanisms related to the resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam in MDR Gram-negative micro-organisms. We focused on antimicrobial activities and resistance traits with particular regard to molecular mechanisms related to resistance to novel βL-βLICs. Lastly, we described and discussed the main detection methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of such molecules. With increasing reports of resistance to novel βL-βLICs, continuous attention should be maintained on the monitoring of the phenotypic traits of MDR pathogens, into the characterization of related mechanisms, and on the emergence of cross-resistance to these novel antimicrobials.

Antibiotics in the pipeline: a literature review (2017-2020)

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat. It increases mortality and morbidity and strains healthcare systems. Health care professionals can counter the rising AMR by promoting antibiotic stewardship and facilitating new drug development. Even with the economic and scientific challenges, it is reassuring that new agents continue to be developed.

Methods

This review addresses new antibiotics in the pipeline. We conducted a review of the literature including Medline, Clinicaltrials.org, and relevant pharmaceutical companies for approved and in pipeline antibiotics in phase 3 or new drug application (NDA).

Results

We found a number of new antibiotics and reviewed their current development status, mode of action, spectra of activity, and indications for which they have been approved. The included studies from phase 3 clinical trials were mainly utilized for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and pneumonia acquired in the healthcare settings. The number of these agents is limited against high priority organisms. The identified antibiotics were based mainly on previously known molecules or pre-existing antimicrobial agents.

Conclusion

There are a limited number of antibiotics against high priority organisms such as multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. New antimicrobial agents directed against the top priority organisms as classified by the World Health Organization are urgently needed.

Novelty and nuance in the intensive care unit: new options to combat multidrug resistant pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the increasing burden of multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens in severe pneumonia and to examine the clinical trials supporting a role for novel agents for the treatment of this infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

MDR Gram-negative bacteria cause an increasing proportion of severe pneumonias. Although the epidemiology of resistance varies across the globe, all regions have seen an evolution in resistance, especially among Enterobacterales spp, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter bumannii. Fortunately, several clinical trials have established the role for multiple new antibiotics in pneumonia. Although these drugs all have different ranges of in vitro activity and potency, each helps to address the problem of MDR. These studies have varied based on the proportion of subjects undergoing mechanical ventilation and the comparator agents employed. Although all these trials have demonstrated noninferiority to the comparator, the mortality rates across the analyses ranged from <% to >20%. None of the recent investigations included immunocompromised subjects.

SUMMARY

Multiple new agents exist for treating MDR Gram-negative pneumonia. These agents are not interchangeable. Thus, one must approach their adoption with a nuanced eye.

Pharmacokinetics of Non-β-Lactam β-Lactamase Inhibitors

The growing emergence of drug-resistant bacterial strains is an issue to treat severe infections, and many efforts have identified new pharmacological agents. The inhibitors of β-lactamases (BLI) have gained a prominent role in the safeguard of beta-lactams. In the last years, new β-lactam-BLI combinations have been registered or are still under clinical evaluation, demonstrating their effectiveness to treat complicated infections. It is also noteworthy that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs partly matches that of β-lactams companions, meaning that some clinical situations, as well as renal impairment and renal replacement therapies, may alter the disposition of both drugs. Common pharmacokinetic characteristics, linear pharmacokinetics across a wide range of doses, and known pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters may guide modifications of dosing regimens for both β-lactams and BLIs. However, comorbidities (i.e., burns, diabetes, cancer) and severe changes in individual pathological conditions (i.e., acute renal impairment, sepsis) could make dose adaptation difficult, because the impact of those factors on BLI pharmacokinetics is partly known. Therapeutic drug monitoring protocols may overcome those issues and offer strategies to personalize drug doses in the intensive care setting. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to improve the use of BLIs and their β-lactam companions in severe and complicated infections.

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam: A new carbapenem β-lactamase inhibitor combination

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial activity, efficacy, safety, and current regulatory status of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a newly approved anti-infective combination of a well-established β-lactam and a new β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients 18 years of age or older with limited or no alternative treatment options. The antibiotic is also indicated for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). The antibiotic is active in vitro against a wide range of pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. The addition of relebactam does not restore the activity of imipenem against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Two phase 3 clinical trials of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were conducted. In the RESTORE-IMI 1 trial, the efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was found to be comparable to that of imipenem/cilastatin plus colistin for the treatment of infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients with HABP/VABP, cUTIs, and cIAIs, with a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity reported with the new antibiotic. The RESTORE-IMI 2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam to piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of HABP/VABP. Commonly reported adverse events in clinical trials included anemia, elevated liver enzymes, electrolyte imbalances, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, phlebitis and/or infusion-site reactions, and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria, including many CRE but excluding MBL-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. It is approved for the treatment of cUTIs, cIAIs, and HABP/VABP.

Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury and 28-Day Mortality in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Bacteremia

Colistin is an, antibiotic used to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex (CRABC) infection. However, colistin is well known for its nephrotoxicity. To accurately assess the effects of colistin on acute kidney injury (AKI) and 28-day mortality, we investigated the risk factors associated with AKI and mortality in patients with CRABC bacteremia who received or never received colistin. Patients with CRABC bacteremia aged ≥18 years were retrospectively identified for 3 years at five tertiary teaching hospitals. AKI was defined by using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. AKI developed in 103 (34.9%) of the 295 patients enrolled patients. AKI developed more frequently in patients who received colistin than in patients who did not (46.7% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis showed that intravenous colistin usage was an independent risk factor for AKI in these patients. Nonfatal disease, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and administration of colistin were protective factors for 28-day mortality. However, the sequential organ failure assessment score and AKI were associated with poor outcomes. In conclusion, colistin may be a double-edged sword; although it causes AKI, it also reduces 28-day mortality in patients with CRABC bacteremia. Therefore, colistin administration as an appropriate antibiotic may improve CRABC bacteremia prognosis, despite its nephrotoxicity.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) is an intravenously administered combination of the carbapenem imipenem, the renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor cilastatin, and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Relebactam is a potent inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases, conferring imipenem activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible strains. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adults and other gram-negative infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis] and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. In pivotal phase II and III trials, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with HABP/VABP and to imipenem/cilastatin in patients with cUTIs and cIAIs. It was also effective in imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of imipenem/cilastatin. Available evidence indicates that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an effective and generally well tolerated option for gram-negative infections in adults, including critically ill and/or high-risk patients, and a potential therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Pharmacotherapeutic advances for recurrent urinary tract infections in women

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of recurrent Urinary tract infections (UTIs) has become challenging because of the dramatic increase in the rates of recurrent infection andof multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review recurrent UTIs(rUTI) management in women.

EXPERT OPINION

Continuous or post-coital prophylaxis with low-dose antimicrobials or intermittent self-treatment has all been demonstrated to be effective in managing rUTIs in women. Intravaginal estrogen therapy , shows potential toward preventing rUTI. Oral vaccine Uro-Vaxom seems to reduce the number of UTIs. There is evidence that other therapies (e.g. cranberry, Methenamine hippurate, oral D-mannose) may decrease the number of symptomatic UTIs. The treatment of CRE-UTIs is focused on a colistin backbone. Carbapenems are considered first-line agents for UTIs caused by ESBL, but their use is associated with increased MDR. The usage of non-carbapenem for the treatment of ESBL UTIs is necessary. Cefepime, Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, and Ceftazidime-Avibactam are justified options. Oral therapy with Pivmecillinam, Fosfomycin, and Nitrofurantoin can be used against uncomplicated UTIs due to ESBL infection.