The Burden of Bloodstream Infections due to Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia in the United States: A Large, Retrospective Database Study

Antibacterial potential of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex cystic fibrosis isolates

Over 160,000 people worldwide suffer from cystic fibrosis (CF), a genetic condition that causes mucus to accumulate in internal organs. Lung decline is a significant health burden for people with CF (pwCF), and chronic bacterial pulmonary infections are a major cause of death. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (Smc) is an emerging, multidrug-resistant CF pathogen that can cause pulmonary exacerbations and result in higher mortality. However, little is known about the antagonistic interactions that occur between Smc isolates from pwCF and competitor bacteria. We obtained 13 Smc isolates from adult and pediatric pwCF located in the United States or Australia. We co-cultured these isolates with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. We also performed whole-genome sequencing of these Smc isolates and compared their genomes using average nucleotide identity analyses. We observed that some Smc CF isolates can engage in antagonistic interactions with P. aeruginosa and S. aureus but recovered a substantial number of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus cells following co-cultures with all tested Smc isolates. By contrast, we discovered that most Smc CF isolates display strong antibacterial properties against E. coli cells and reduce recovery below detectable limits. Finally, we demonstrate that Smc CF strains from this study belong to diverse phylogenetic lineages.

IMPORTANCE

Antagonism toward competitor bacteria may be important for the survival of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (Smc) in external environments, for the elimination of commensal species and colonization of upper respiratory tracts to enable early infections, and for competition against other pathogens after establishing chronic infections. These intermicrobial interactions could facilitate the acquisition of Smc by people with cystic fibrosis from environmental or nosocomial sources. Elucidating the mechanisms used by Smc to eliminate other bacteria could lead to new insights into the development of novel treatments.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia virulence: a current view

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen intrinsically resistant to multiple and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Although the bacterium is considered a low-virulence pathogen, it can cause various severe diseases and contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of multibacterial infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, S. maltophilia has been recognized as one of the most common causative agents of respiratory co-infections and bacteremia in critically ill COVID-19 patients. The high ability to adapt to unfavorable environments and new habitat niches, as well as the sophisticated switching of metabolic pathways, are unique mechanisms that attract the attention of clinical researchers and experts studying the fundamental basis of virulence. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the molecular aspects of S. maltophilia virulence and putative virulence factors, partially touched on interspecific bacterial interactions and iron uptake systems in the context of virulence, and have not addressed antibiotic resistance.

Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are clinically important due to its intrinsic resistance to a broad range of antibiotics. Therefore, selecting the most appropriate antibiotic to treat S. maltophilia infection is a major challenge.

AIM

The current meta-analysis aimed to investigate the global prevalence of antibiotic resistance among S. maltophilia isolates to the develop more effective therapeutic strategies.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed using the appropriate search syntax after searching Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases (May 2023). Statistical analysis was performed using Pooled and the random effects model in R and the metafor package. A total of 11,438 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 289 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

Present analysis indicated that the highest incidences of resistance were associated with doripenem (97%), cefoxitin (96%), imipenem and cefuroxime (95%), ampicillin (94%), ceftriaxone (92%), aztreonam (91%) and meropenem (90%) which resistance to Carbapenems is intrinsic. The lowest resistance rates were documented for minocycline (3%), cefiderocol (4%). The global resistance rate to TMP-SMX remained constant in two periods before and after 2010 (14.4% vs. 14.6%). A significant increase in resistance to tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam was observed before and after 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

Minocycline and cefiderocol can be considered the preferred treatment options due to low resistance rates, although regional differences in resistance rates to other antibiotics should be considered. The low global prevalence of resistance to TMP-SMX as a first-line treatment for S. maltophilia suggests that it remains an effective treatment option.

Antibiotic resistance genes prediction via whole genome sequence analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is the first dominant ubiquitous bacterial species identified from the genus Stenotrophomonas in 1943 from a human source. S. maltophilia clinical strains are resistance to several therapies, this study is designed to investigate the whole genome sequence and antimicrobial resistance genes prediction in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) SARC-5 and SARC-6 strains, isolated from the nasopharyngeal samples of an immunocompromised patient.

METHODS

These bacterial strains were obtained from Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS) Hospital, Pakistan. The bacterial genome was sequenced using a whole-genome shotgun via a commercial service that used an NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) technology called as Illumina Hiseq 2000 system for genomic sequencing. Moreover, detailed in-silico analyses were done to predict the presence of antibiotic resistance genes in S. maltophilia.

RESULTS

Results showed that S. maltophilia is a rare gram negative, rod-shaped, non sporulating bacteria. The genome assembly results in 24 contigs (>500 bp) having a size of 4668,850 bp with 65.8% GC contents. Phylogenetic analysis showed that SARC-5 and SARC-6 were closely related to S. maltophilia B111, S. maltophilia BAB-5317, S. maltophilia AHL, S. maltophilia BAB-5307, S. maltophilia RD-AZPVI_04, S. maltophilia JFZ2, S. maltophilia RD_MAAMIB_06 and lastly with S. maltophilia sp ROi7. Moreover, the whole genome sequence analysis of both SARC-5 and SARC-6 revealed the presence of four resistance genes adeF, qacG, adeF, and smeR.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that S. maltophilia SARC-5 and SARC-6 are one of the leading causes of nosocomial infection which carry multiple antibiotic resistance genes.

The type VI secretion system of the emerging pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex has antibacterial properties

IMPORTANCE

Infections with the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex can be fatal for immunocompromised patients. The mechanisms used by the bacterium to compete against other prokaryotes are not well understood. We found that the type VI secretion system (T6SS) allows S. maltophilia complex to eliminate other bacteria and contributes to the competitive fitness against a co-infecting isolate. The presence of T6SS genes in isolates across the globe highlights the importance of this apparatus as a weapon in the antibacterial arsenal of S. maltophilia complex. The T6SS may confer survival advantages to S. maltophilia complex isolates in polymicrobial communities in both environmental settings and during infections.

Current viewpoint on the epidemiology of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacterial strains

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to review the epidemiology of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNB) based on recent literature reports, particularly, of the less common, but with emerging clinical significance species.

RECENT FINDINGS

The reported frequency of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is increasing, with very significant variability, however, between different countries. Apart from the major NFGNB, that is, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, already recognized as of critical importance healthcare risks, several other NFGNB genera have been increasingly associated with diverse severe infections, such as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Burkholderia spp., Elizabethkingia spp., Chryseobacterium spp., Achromobacter spp., Alcaligenes spp., Sphingomonas spp., Shewanella spp. and Ralstonia spp., among others.

SUMMARY

The exploration of the epidemiology, as well as the pathogenic potential of the of the less frequent, but emerging and increasingly reported NFGNB, is crucial, not only for immunocompromised patients, but also for critically ill patients without overt immunosuppression. As we are heading fast towards a postantibiotic era, such information would contribute to the optimal antimicrobial management, that is, providing prompt, appropriate antimicrobial coverage when needed and, at the same time, avoiding overuse and/or inappropriate use of antimicrobial therapy. Also, it would help to better understand their transmission dynamics and to develop effective prevention strategies.

Emerging infections in vulnerable hosts: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis .

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2020, numerous outbreaks of S. maltophilia and E. anophelis have been reported worldwide. Most of these outbreaks have been associated with healthcare facilities, although one outbreak caused by E. anophelis in France was considered a community-associated infection. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), levofloxacin, and minocycline have exhibited good efficacy against S. maltophilia . Additionally, cefiderocol and a combination of aztreonam and avibactam have shown promising results in in vitro susceptibility testing. For E. anophelis , there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although some studies have reported good efficacy with rifampin, TMP-SMZ, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefoperazone/sulbactam, minocycline had the most favourable in vitro susceptibility rates. Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative due to its low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against E. anophelis . The role of vancomycin in treatment is still uncertain, although several successful cases with vancomycin treatment, even with high MIC values, have been reported.

SUMMARY

Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable to infections caused by S. maltophilia and E. anophelis , but the optimal treatment strategy remains inconclusive. Further research is necessary to determine the most effective use of conventional and novel antimicrobial agents in combatting these multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: An Urgent Threat with Increasing Antibiotic Resistance

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that can cause many infections, such as chronic pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis and infections in immunocompromised patients with hematology-oncology diseases. Because of its remarkable and increasing antimicrobial resistance, the treatment of S. maltophilia infections is quite challenging. Meanwhile, the prevalence of S. maltophilia infections is increasing in recent decades. S. maltophilia is usually considered to be of low virulence but has numerous virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of infections caused by S. maltophilia. By revealing its pathogenesis associated with virulence factors and molecular mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance, many existing or potential therapeutic strategies have been developed. However, because of the limited treatment options, new strategies are urgently needed. Here, we review the recent progresses in research on S. maltophilia which may help to develop more effective treatments against this increasing threat.

Intra-Abdominal Abscess and Bacteremia Due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia After Total Gastrectomy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is increasingly recognized as a pathogen responsible for nosocomial infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients. The most common types of S. maltophilia infections are pneumonia and catheter-related bloodstream infection, and clinical cases of intra-abdominal abscesses due to S. maltophilia are rare. We present a rare case of intra-abdominal abscess and bacteremia as a surgical site infection (SSI) caused by S. maltophilia in a patient following total gastrectomy. We also reviewed previous literature to elucidate the clinical characteristics of intra-abdominal abscess due to S. maltophilia. The patient, a 75-year-old man with diabetes and polymyositis (treated with prednisolone), developed a fever 17 days after undergoing a total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a hypodense solid mass at the esophagojejunostomy site, which appeared to be an intra-abdominal abscess. The culture of both blood and drained abscess pus confirmed only S. maltophilia. Treatment with intravenous trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and abscess drainage led to complete resolution. The patient recovered and was discharged and did not experience a recurrence. We reviewed the English literature and found only two additional case reports of intra-abdominal abscesses caused by S. maltophilia. As in our case, the intra-abdominal abscess occurred after abdominal surgery and the source was suspected to be deep SSI. This case highlights the importance of considering S. maltophilia as a potential pathogen in patients with atypical post-surgical abdominal infections. Physicians should be aware that S. maltophilia has the potential to cause intra-abdominal abscesses secondary to SSI, in addition to Enterobacteriaceae, a major causative pathogen of SSI. Further studies are required to elucidate the etiology, epidemiology, and risk factors for SSI caused by S. maltophilia.

Global impact of antibacterial resistance in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at high risk of developing bacterial infections. These patients may suffer severe consequences from these infections if they do not receive immediate effective therapies, and thus are uniquely threatened by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Here, we outline how the emergence of specific resistant bacteria threatens the effectiveness of established approaches to prevent and treat infections in this population. The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacterales and viridans group streptococci may decrease the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during neutropenia. The emergence of Enterobacterales that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases or carbapenemases and of increasingly resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa may result in neutropenic patients experiencing delayed time to active antibacterial therapy, and consequently worse clinical outcomes. The ability to select targeted antibacterial therapies after the availability of susceptibility data may be limited in patients infected with metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia can cause breakthrough infections in patients already being treated with broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Resistance can also limit the ability to provide oral stepdown antibacterial therapy for patients who could otherwise be discharged from hospitalization. We also outline strategies that have the potential to mitigate the negative impact of antimicrobial resistance, including interventions based on active screening for colonization with resistant bacteria and the use of novel rapid diagnostic assays. Additional research is needed to better understand how these strategies can be leveraged to combat the emerging crisis of antimicrobial resistance in patients with hematologic malignancies and HCT recipients.

Functional network analysis identifies multiple virulence and antibiotic resistance targets in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an emerging multidrug-resistant opportunistic bacterium in humans is of major concern for immunocompromised individuals for causing pneumonia and bloodborne infections. This bacterial pathogen is associated with a considerable fatality/case ratio, with up to 100%, when presented as hemorrhagic fever. It is resistant to commonly used drugs as well as to antibiotic combinations. In-silico based functional network analysis is a key approach to get novel insights into virulence and resistance in pathogenic organisms. This study included the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis of 150 specific genes identified for antibiotic resistance mechanism and virulence pathways. Eight proteins, namely, PilL, FliA, Smlt2260, Smlt2267, CheW, Smlt2318, CheZ, and FliM were identified as hub proteins. Further docking studies of 58 selected phytochemicals were performed against the identified hub proteins. Deoxytubulosine and corosolic acid were found to be potent inhibitors of hub proteins of pathogenic S. maltophilia based on protein-ligand interactive study. Further pharmacophore studies are warranted with these molecules to develop them as novel antibiotics against S. maltophilia.

Steno-sphere: Navigating the enigmatic world of emerging multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen and frequent cause of serious nosocomial infections. Patient populations at greatest risk for these infections include the immunocompromised and those with chronic respiratory illnesses and prior antibiotic exposure, notably to carbapenems. Its complex virulence and resistance profile drastically limit available antibiotics, and incomplete breakpoint and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data to inform dose optimization further complicates therapeutic approaches. Clinical comparison data of first-line agents, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), quinolones, and minocycline, are limited to conflicting observational data with no clear benefit of a single agent or combination therapy. Newer antibiotic approaches, including cefiderocol and aztreonam- avibactam, are promising alternatives for extensively drug-resistant isolates; however, clinical outcomes data are needed. The potential clinical utility of bacteriophage for compassionate use in treating S. maltophilia infections remains to be determined since data is limited to in-vitro and sparse in-vivo work. This article provides a review of available literature for S. maltophilia infection management focused on related epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, identification, susceptibility testing, antimicrobial PK/PD, and emerging therapeutic strategies.

The Prognosis of Patients Tested Positive for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from Different Sources

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognosis of patients tested positive for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SMA) from different sources.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted among 651 patients tested positive for SMA from January 2020 to October 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The patients were divided into seven groups by the source of SMA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for mortality in patients tested positive for SMA from different sources.

Results

A total of 651 SMA isolates were collected from various sources, including sputum (348 isolates, 53%), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (52, 8%), abdominal drainage fluid (76, 12%), wound secretion (66, 10%), blood (62, 10%), urine (41, 6%) and cerebrospinal fluid (6, 1%). Compared with other groups, the mortality of the patients in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid culture group, blood culture group, and abdominal drainage fluid culture group was higher, at 40.38%, 32.26%, and 26.32%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that continuous renal replacement therapy was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with SMA bloodstream infection (P=0.020, OR=6.86), and effective antimicrobial therapy after being positive for S. maltophilia isolates (P=0.002, OR=0.10) was negatively correlated with the death of patients with SMA bloodstream infection. Age ≥65 years (P= 0.043, OR=4.96), kidney disease (P=0.045, OR=4.62) and antifungal agent exposure (P=0.036, OR=5.13) were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with SMA intra-abdominal infection. Antifungal agent exposure (P=0.024, OR=0.51) and glycopeptide exposure (P=0.045, OR=0.53) were independent risk factors for mortality in patients in the sputum culture group.

Conclusion

SMA has a high rate of antimicrobial resistance and can cause multisite infection. Pulmonary infections, bloodstream infections and abdominal infections caused by SMA have high mortality, and timely standardized treatment can reduce mortality.

The Type VI Secretion System of the Emerging Pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has Antibacterial Properties

Antagonistic behaviors between bacterial cells can have profound effects on microbial populations and disease outcomes. Polymicrobial interactions may be mediated by contact-dependent proteins with antibacterial properties. The Type VI Secretion System (T6SS) is a macromolecular weapon used by Gram-negative bacteria to translocate proteins into adjacent cells. The T6SS is used by pathogens to escape immune cells, eliminate commensal bacteria, and facilitate infection. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that causes a wide range of infections in immunocompromised patients and infects the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis. Infections with the bacterium can be deadly and are challenging to treat because many isolates are multidrug-resistant. We found that globally dispersed S. maltophilia clinical and environmental strains possess T6SS genes. We demonstrate that the T6SS of an S. maltophilia patient isolate is active and can eliminate other bacteria. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the T6SS contributes to the competitive fitness of S. maltophilia against a co-infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate, and that the T6SS alters the cellular organization of S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa co-cultures. This study expands our knowledge of the mechanisms employed by S. maltophilia to secrete antibacterial proteins and compete against other bacteria.

IMPORTANCE

Infections with the opportunistic pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia can be fatal for immunocompromised patients. The mechanisms used by the bacterium to compete against other prokaryotes are not well understood. We found that the T6SS allows S. maltophilia to eliminate other bacteria and contributes to the competitive fitness against a co-infecting isolate. The presence of T6SS genes in isolates across the globe highlights the importance of this apparatus as a weapon in the antibacterial arsenal of S. maltophilia . The T6SS may confer survival advantages to S. maltophilia isolates in polymicrobial communities in both environmental settings and during infections.

Risk Factors for Infection and Mortality Associated With Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Bloodstream Infections in Children; Comparison With Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infections

INTRODUCTION

The increasing incidence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ( S. maltophilia ) infections raises concern because of the high fatality/case ratio. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for infection and mortality associated with S. maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSIs) in children and compare them with Pseudomonas aeruginosa BSIs.

METHODS

All BSIs caused by S. maltophilia (n:73) and P. aeruginosa (n:80) were enrolled in this study between January 2014 and December 2021 at the Medical School of Ege University.

RESULTS

Previous Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission, prior glycopeptide, and carbapenem use were significantly more common in patients with S. maltophilia BSIs ( P = 0.044, P = 0.009, and P = 0.001, respectively) than with P. aeruginosa BSIs. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly higher in S. maltophilia BSIs ( P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that prior carbapenem use was associated with S. maltophilia BSIs ( P = 0.014, adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.710; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.225-5.992). PICU admission because of BSI, prior carbapenem and glycopeptide use, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were significantly more common in patients with mortality because of S. maltophilia BSIs ( P < 0.001, P = 0.010, P = 0.007, P = 0.008, P = 0.004, respectively), while only PICU admission because of BSI, and prior glycopeptide use were significant in multivariate analysis (AOR, 19.155; 95% CI: 2.337-157.018; P = 0.006 and AOR, 9.629; 95% CI: 1.053-88.013; P = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Prior carbapenem use is a significant risk factor for developing S. maltophilia BSIs. PICU admission because of BSI and prior glycopeptide use are risk factors associated with the mortality rate in patients with S. maltophilia BSIs. Therefore, S. maltophilia should be considered in patients with these risk factors, and empirical treatment should include antibiotics for S. maltophilia .

Upraising Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Critically Ill Patients: A New Enemy?

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia), an important pathogen in immuno-compromised patients, has recently gained attention in patients admitted in intensive care units (ICU). We sought to investigate clinical features of infections caused by S. maltophilia in ICU patients and identify risk factors for mortality. We conducted a retrospective study in two multivalent non-COVID-19 ICUs of tertiary-teaching hospitals in Greece and Spain, including patients with isolated S. maltophilia from at least one clinical specimen along with clinical signs of infection. A total of 103 patients (66% male) were analyzed. Median age was 65.5 (54–73.3) years and mean APACHE II and SOFA scores upon ICU admission were 18.36 (±7.22) and 18.17 (±6.95), respectively. Pneumonia was the predominant clinical syndrome (72.8%), while 22% of cases were among hemato/oncology patients. Crude 28-day mortality rate was 54.8%, even though, 14-day clinical and microbiological response was 96%. Age, APACHE II on ICU admission, hemato-oncologic disease, and multi-organ failure were initially identified as potential predictors of mortality. In the multivariable analysis, only increasing age and hemato-oncologic disease were shown to be independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. High all-cause mortality was observed in critically ill patients with predominantly respiratory infections by S. maltophilia, despite initial clinical and laboratory response after targeted treatment. The study elucidates a potentially worrisome emerging pathogen in the ICU.

Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Experimental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an important cause of pneumonia in immunocompromised patients. Cefiderocol is a parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent in vitro activity against S. maltophilia. We evaluated the efficacy of cefiderocol in a neutropenic rabbit model of S. maltophilia pneumonia in comparison to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). The cefiderocol area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve extrapolated to 8 h (AUC_0–8) was lower (423.0 ± 40.9 μg·h/mL versus 713.6 ± 40.1 μg·h/mL) and clearance higher (252.77 ± 38.9 mL/h/kg versus 142.6 ± 32.9 mL/h/kg) in infected versus noninfected rabbits. We studied a clinical bloodstream S. maltophilia isolate with an MIC of 0.03 μg/mL of cefiderocol. Time spent above the MIC of cefiderocol for the majority of S. maltophilia isolates in rabbits recapitulated the plasma concentration-time profile observed in adult humans at the licensed dose of 2 g given intravenously (i.v.). Experimental groups consisted of 120 mg/kg cefiderocol i.v. every 8 hours (q8h); TMP-SMX, 5 mg/kg i.v. Q12h, and untreated controls (UCs). Treatment was administered for 10 days. Survival in cefiderocol-treated rabbits (87%) was greater than that in TMP-SMX-treated (25%; P < 0.05) and UC (0%; P < 0.05) groups. There was no residual bacterial burden in lung tissue or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in the cefiderocol group. Residual bacterial burden was present in lung tissue and BAL fluid in the TMP-SMX group but was decreased in comparison to UCs (P < 0.001). Lung weights (markers of pulmonary injury) were decreased in cefiderocol-treated versus TMP-SMX (P < 0.001) and UC (P < 0.001) groups. Cefiderocol is highly active in treatment of experimental S. maltophilia pneumonia, laying the foundation for future clinical investigations against this lethal infection in immunocompromised patients.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment Algorithm for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Expert Panel Opinion

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the in vitro chemostat model

BACKGROUND

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole has historically been the treatment of choice for infection caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. This study sought to define the pharmacodynamic indices and magnitude of exposure required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu reductions.

METHODS

Pharmacodynamic studies were conducted using the in vitro chemostat model over 24 h against three trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-susceptible S. maltophilia isolates with MICs from 0.25/4.75 to 2/38 mg/L. The primary endpoint was the change in cfu at 24 h relative to baseline. The log ratio of the area under the cfu curve (LR AUcfu) was a secondary endpoint. Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole exposures required for stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reduction were determined.

RESULTS

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole exposures achieved stasis and 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions in 9/16 (56%) and 2/16 (13%) of experiments. Both the fAUC/MIC and fCmax/MIC were identified as equivalent pharmacodynamic drivers, with stasis achieved at an fAUC/MIC of 67.4 and 30.0 for trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Clinically meaningful exposures required to achieve 1 log10 cfu/mL reductions were not quantifiable. The LR AUcfu analysis supported the lack of overall bacterial burden reduction against S. maltophilia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this in vitro chemostat model, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole monotherapy, even at higher doses, achieved limited activity against susceptible S. maltophilia.

Activity of Delafloxacin and Levofloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia at Simulated Plasma and Intrapulmonary pH Values

Fluoroquinolones have become a popular treatment option for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Although levofloxacin is most commonly used, delafloxacin demonstrates comparable in vitro activity when evaluated under standard susceptibility testing conditions at neutral pH. At acidic pH, the activity of the anionic delafloxacin is improved, while the activity of the zwitterionic levofloxacin is reduced. Because the human respiratory tract has a pH of ~6.6 and is the most common site of S. maltophilia infection, it is vital to understand the activity of these agents in this environment. Therefore, levofloxacin and delafloxacin were tested against clinical S. maltophilia isolates via broth microdilution testing (n = 37) and time-kill analysis (n = 5) in neutral cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) (pH 7.3) and acidic CAMHB (aCAMHB) (pH 6.5). In CAMHB, MIC50 values were similar between levofloxacin and delafloxacin (8 mg/L versus 8 mg/L). In aCAMHB, levofloxacin MICs did not change, while delafloxacin MICs decreased by a median of 4 log2 dilutions (MIC50 values of 8 mg/L versus 0.25 mg/L). In time-kill analyses, levofloxacin and delafloxacin at the maximum drug concentration for the free drug (fCmax) were bactericidal against 3 and 2 isolates in CAMHB, respectively. In aCAMHB, levofloxacin was not bactericidal against any isolate, while delafloxacin was bactericidal against the same 2 isolates. Relative to CAMHB, levofloxacin activity was reduced by 2.5 log10 CFU/mL in aCAMHB, whereas delafloxacin activity was increased 2.7 log10 CFU/mL. Although the bactericidal activity of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia was attenuated in an acidic environment in this study, the increased potency of delafloxacin at pH 6.5 did not translate into improved bactericidal activity in time-kill analyses, compared to pH 7.3. IMPORTANCE Stenotrophomonas maltophilia most often infects the lungs, where the physiologic environment is naturally slightly acidic (pH ~6.6), compared to most parts of the body (such as the bloodstream), which have neutral pH values (~7.4). Pneumonia due to S. maltophilia is often treated with the antibiotic levofloxacin, despite the activity of levofloxacin being known to be impaired at acidic pH. Unfortunately, currently available methods for susceptibility testing of levofloxacin against S. maltophilia are performed at a neutral pH and therefore may not accurately represent the activity of levofloxacin at the site of infection in the lungs. A similar but newer antibiotic in the same class as levofloxacin, namely, delafloxacin, is not affected by being in an acidic environment and may actually work better at lower pH values. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether one drug might be better than the other in this setting by testing each agent's ability to kill S. maltophilia at pH 7.3 and pH 6.5. These findings could then be used to design confirmatory studies that may ultimately impact which drug is given to patients with lung infections due to S. maltophilia.

Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a non-fermenting, Gram-negative bacillus that has emerged as an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen. Its intrinsic multidrug resistance makes treating infections caused by S. maltophilia a great clinical challenge. Clinical management is further complicated by its molecular heterogeneity that is reflected in the uneven distribution of antibiotic resistance and virulence determinants among different strains, the shortcomings of available antimicrobial susceptibility tests and the lack of standardized breakpoints for the handful of antibiotics with in vitro activity against this microorganism. Herein, we provide an update on the most recent literature concerning these issues, emphasizing the impact they have on clinical management of S. maltophilia infections.

The Threat of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Unignorable Respiratory Non-Fermentative Bacteria-Derived Bloodstream Infections

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) bloodstream infection (BSI) pose a significant threat to the prognosis of hematologic malignancies (HM) patients. Understanding the distribution of pathogenic bacteria, changes in carbapenem-resistant trends, risk factors for CRGNB infections, and exploring the early detection measures can help reduce mortality.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) BSI in patients with HM in three university-affiliated hospitals in Hunan Province, China, from January 2010 to December 2020. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the hospital electronic medical records system.

Results

CRGNB caused 138 (15.3%) of 902 GNB BSI. The detection rate of CRGNB increased from 6.4% in 2010–2012 to 35.4% in 2019–2020. The 7-day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with CRGNB BSI than in patients with carbapenem-susceptible Gram-negative bacteria (CSGNB) BSI [31.9% (44/138) vs 9.7% (74/764), P < 0.001], and the mortality rate in patients with carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting bacteria (CRNFB) bloodstream infections was generally higher than that of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Urinary catheter (OR, 2.814; CI=1.395–5.680; P=0.004) and prior exposure to carbapenem (OR, 4.372; CI=2.881–6.635; P<0.001) were independent risk factors for CRGNB BSI. Analysis of co-infections showed that 50%–85% of patients with CRGNB BSI had pulmonary infections, sputum culture results suggested that sputum culture positivity rate was as high as 57.1%–66.7% in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia BSI, and the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of sputum cultures were consistent with the blood cultures.

Conclusion

Carbapenem resistance has dramatically increased in HM patients with GNB BSI in recent years and is associated with a worse outcome, especially for non-fermenting bacteria. In high-risk patients, early screening of the respiratory tract specimens may help to detect CRNFB colonization and protect patients from breakthrough BSI.

Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an underappreciated source of morbidity and mortality among Gram-negative pathogens. Effective treatment options with acceptable toxicity profiles are limited. Phenotypic susceptibility testing via commercial automated test systems is problematic and no FDA breakpoints are approved for any of the first-line treatment options for S. maltophilia. The lack of modern pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic data for many agents impedes dose optimization and the lack of robust efficacy and safety data limits their clinical utility. Levofloxacin has demonstrated similar efficacy to SMX-TMP, although rapid development of resistance is a concern. Minocycline demonstrates the highest rate of in vitro susceptibility, however, evidence to support its clinical use are scant. Novel agents such as cefiderocol have exhibited promising activity in pre-clinical investigations, though additional outcomes data are needed to determine its place in therapy for S. maltophilia. Combination therapy is often employed despite the dearth of adequate supporting data.

Outcomes with Cefiderocol Treatment in Patients with Bacteraemia Enrolled into Prospective Phase 2 and Phase 3 Randomised Clinical Studies

Introduction

A post hoc, descriptive analysis of three prospective, randomised, controlled clinical studies investigating cefiderocol in gram-negative bacterial infections was conducted to assess its efficacy in patients with baseline bacteraemia.

Methods

Data from APEKS-cUTI (NCT02321800), APEKS-NP (NCT03032380) and CREDIBLE-CR (NCT02714595) studies were assessed individually. Patients received cefiderocol 2g, q8h, for 7–14 days or comparators (imipenem/cilastatin [APEKS-cUTI], meropenem [APEKS-NP] or best available therapy [BAT; CREDIBLE-CR]). Bacteraemia and clinical outcomes were assessed at early assessment (EA), end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) for patients in the intention-to-treat populations with baseline blood samples positive for aerobic gram-negative species. Eradication, persistence or recurrence of baseline blood pathogen was confirmed from follow-up blood cultures; in the absence of follow-up blood cultures, clinical response, administration of additional antibiotics and vital status were used to assess bacteraemia outcome.

Results

Of 885 patients randomised, 84 had bacteraemia and 89 (cefiderocol: 55, comparators: 34) gram-negative pathogens were isolated, namely Enterobacterales (n = 62) and non-fermenters (n = 27). At EA, on-therapy bacteraemia eradication rates in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 100% (19/19), 50.0% (4/8) and 72.0% (18/25) with cefiderocol. Corresponding rates for comparators were 77.8% (7/9), 100% (10/10) and 69.2% (9/13), respectively. Persistence in blood at EA was seen in six patients overall (cefiderocol: 3, comparators: 3); indeterminate responses were common (cefiderocol: 8, comparators: 3), usually due to lack of blood cultures. Clinical cure/improvement rates at EA in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 100% (19/19), 62.5% (5/8) and 64.0% (16/25) with cefiderocol. Corresponding rates for comparators were 77.8% (7/9), 90.0% (9/10) and 30.8% (4/13), respectively. Bacteraemia eradication rates with cefiderocol in APEKS-cUTI, APEKS-NP and CREDIBLE-CR were 89.5%, 37.5% and 60.0% at EOT and 78.9%, 12.5% and 44.0% at TOC.

Conclusion

This descriptive analysis suggests that cefiderocol may be a useful treatment option for gram-negative bacteraemia, including pathogens resistant to other antibiotics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00598-9.

Real-World, Multicenter Evaluation of the Incidence and Risk Factors for Non-susceptible Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates

BACKGROUND

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a cause of infection most commonly in the opportunistic host. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and levofloxacin are considered first line treatment agents. With reports of increasing resistance to these first line agents it is important to determine risk factors associated with a non-susceptible isolate.

METHODS

This was a real-world, multicenter, retrospective case-control study from five centers in the southeast United States evaluating S. maltophilia. The primary outcome was risk factors associated with non-susceptibility of S. maltophilia isolates to ≥1 antimicrobial agent. Secondary outcomes include incidence of S. maltophilia non-susceptibility, all-cause mortality, and 30-day readmission rates.

RESULTS

There were 325 patients included in the study. For the primary outcome, the only factor associated with non-susceptibility per univariate analysis was isolation from urine culture (13.3% vs. 5.4%; p=0.014); while presence of mechanical ventilation (37.7% vs. 21.5%) and ICU admission (35.3% vs. 18.4%) were associated with susceptibility (p<0.001). For the secondary outcomes, non-susceptibility was present in 49% of isolates with 43/325 (13.2%), 53/324 (16.4%), and 105/172 (61%) to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime, respectively. Resistance to chloramphenicol and tigecycline was observed among 5/26 and 11/16 of tested isolates, respectively. Sixty-six patients (20%) experienced all-cause, inpatient mortality (18% susceptible vs. 23% non-susceptible; p=0.280) and forty-four patients (17%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge (16% susceptible vs. 18% non-susceptible; p=0.673).

CONCLUSION

S. maltophilia non-susceptibility had a prevalence of ∼50% to at least one first-line or commonly used agent. More research is needed to delineate risk factors for non-susceptible isolates.

In vitro Time Kill of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli using Cation Adjusted Muller Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) is considered the treatment of choice for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , but limited pharmacodynamic data are available to support current susceptibility breakpoints or guide optimal dosing. Time-kill studies using a TMP/SMZ concentration of 4/40 μg/mL were conducted to compare 4 S. maltophilia with 4 Escherichia coli having the same MICs (0.25/4.75-4/76 μg/mL) in cation adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) and ISO-Sensitest™ broth (ISO). With the exception of the resistant isolates (4/76 μg/mL), which resulted in regrowth approaching control, TMP/SMZ displayed significantly greater killing for E. coli compared with S. maltophilia at each MIC. Against E. coli , mean changes at 24 hour were -4.49, -1.73, -1.59, and +1.83 log 10 colony forming units (CFU) for isolates with MICs of 0.25/4.75, 1/19, 2/39, and 4/74 μg/mL, respectively. The f AUC/MIC required for stasis, 1-log 10 , and 2-log 10 CFU reductions were 40.7, 59.5, and 86.3, respectively. In contrast, TMP/SMZ displayed no stasis or CFU reductions against any S. maltophilia regardless of MIC, and no pharmacodynamic thresholds were quantifiable. Observations were consistent in both CAMHB and ISO broth. These data add increasing evidence that current TMP/SMZ susceptibility breakpoints against S. maltophilia should be reassessed.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

METHODS

A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as "suggested approaches" based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.

Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Focus on Novel Therapies

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an urgent global threat due to its increasing incidence and intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic development has focused on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter, with approved antibiotics in recent years having limited activity for Stenotrophomonas. Accordingly, novel treatment strategies for Stenotrophomonas are desperately needed. We conducted a systemic literature review and offer recommendations based on current evidence for a treatment strategy of Stenotrophomonas infection.

Levofloxacin pharmacodynamics against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model: implications for susceptibility breakpoint revision

BACKGROUND

Levofloxacin displays in vitro activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (STM); however, current susceptibility breakpoints are supported by limited data. We employed the murine neutropenic thigh infection model to assess levofloxacin pharmacodynamics against STM.

METHODS

Twenty-six clinical STM were studied using the neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Human simulated regimens (HSR) of levofloxacin 750 mg q24h were administered over 24 h. Efficacy was measured as the change in log10 cfu/thigh at 24 h compared with 0 h. Composite cfu data were fitted to an Emax model to determine the fAUC/MIC needed for stasis and 1 log10 reduction at 24 h. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine PTA.

RESULTS

Levofloxacin MICs ranged from 0.5-8 mg/L. Mean bacterial burden at 0 h was 6.21 ± 0.20 log10 cfu/thigh. In the 24 h controls, bacterial growth was 1.64 ± 0.66 log10 cfu/thigh. In isolates with levofloxacin MICs ≤1, 2 and ≥4 mg/L, changes in bacterial density following levofloxacin HSR were -1.66 ± 0.89, 0.13 ± 0.97 and 1.54 ± 0.43 log10 cfu/thigh, respectively. The Emax model demonstrated strong agreement between fAUC/MIC and change in bacterial density (R2 = 0.82). The fAUC/MIC exposure needed for stasis and 1 log10 reduction was 39.9 and 54.9, respectively. PTAs for the 1 log10 reduction threshold were 95.8, 72.2, and 26.6% at MICs of 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first data to describe fAUC/MIC thresholds predictive of cfu reductions for levofloxacin against STM. Due to poor in vivo efficacy and PTA at MICs ≥2 mg/L, reassessment of the current susceptibility breakpoint is warranted.

In Vitro Activity and In Vivo Efficacy of Cefiderocol against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore cephalosporin antibiotic with broad coverage against difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria, including those resistant to carbapenems. Its activity against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia was investigated in vitro against clinical isolates and in lung infection models using strains either resistant (SR202006) or susceptible (SR201934, SR200614) to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against all 217 S. maltophilia clinical isolates tested (MIC50, 0.063 μg/ml; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml). Cefiderocol also demonstrated low MICs against the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. maltophilia strains (i.e., SR202006; MIC, 0.125 μg/ml). In a neutropenic mouse lung infection model, cefiderocol (30 mg/kg body weight and 100 mg/kg) demonstrated a significant, dose-dependent reduction in the lung viable bacteria cell count compared with untreated controls in S. maltophilia infection and was the only antibiotic tested to show a similar significant effect in a trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. maltophilia infection. In immunocompetent rat lung infection models of S. maltophilia, humanized dosing of cefiderocol (2 g every 8 h) and meropenem (1 g every 8 h) revealed pharmacokinetic profiles similar to those in human subjects, and the humanized cefiderocol dosing significantly reduced the lung viable bacteria cell count compared with baseline controls, which received no intervention. Together, the results from these studies suggest that cefiderocol could provide an effective alternative treatment option for S. maltophilia infections in the lower respiratory tract, particularly strains resistant to empirical antibiotics, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or minocycline.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in children: risk factors and mortality rate

Purpose

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is an opportunistic and nosocomial pathogen that can cause an invasive and fatal infection, particularly in hospitalized and immunocompromised patients. However, little is known about the impact of S. maltophilia bacteremia in pediatric patients. Therefore, we aimed to identify risk factors for mortality, antibiotics susceptibility to S. maltophilia, and mortality rates in pediatric patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study by identifying all S. maltophilia positive blood cultures in the microbiology laboratory database between January 2007 and December 2018 from hospitalized pediatric patients (age 1–14 years). After identifying patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia, medical charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical data, and outcomes within seven days of bacteremia diagnosis. Risk factors associated with mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia patients were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Findings

Sixty-eight pediatric patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia were identified. All infections were nosocomial infections, and (88.2%) bacteremia cases were catheter-related bloodstream infections. On multivariate analysis, ICU admission prior to bacteremia episode and neutropenia were the major risk factors associated with mortality. S. maltophilia was the most susceptible to trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX, 94.1%), followed by levofloxacin (85.7%). The overall mortality rate within seven days of S. maltophilia bacteremia diagnosis was 33.8%.

Conclusion

S. maltophilia bacteremia is a devastating emerging infection associated with high mortality among hospitalized children. Therefore, early diagnosis and prompt management based on local susceptibility data are crucial. Various risk factors, especially ICU admission prior to bacteremia episode and neutropenia, are associated with S. maltophilia bacteremia mortality.