Peginterferon and Entecavir Combination Therapy Improves Outcome of Non-Early Response Hepatitis B e Antigen-Positive Patients

Combination and Intermittent Therapy Based on Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a for Chronic Hepatitis B with Nucleoside (Nucleotide) Analog-Experienced Resulting in Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Clearance: A Case Report

Interferon (IFN) and nucleoside (nucleotide) analogs (NAs) are two effective antiviral drugs for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). More and more evidence shows that the combination of the two drugs can better inhibit viral replication and even achieve clinical cure. IFN intermittent therapy is also considered to be an important measure to resolve IFN fatigue when hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline appears stagnated during IFN-based antiviral therapy. A 36-year-old male NA-experienced patient with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive CHB was admitted to our hospital. After a poor response to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy for 1 year, the patient was treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a combination therapy and finally achieved HBsAg clearance. During the treatment and follow-up, HBsAg, HBeAg, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, and serum alanine aminotransferase, etc. were monitored every 3 months. Between weeks 58 and 71 of combination therapy, IFN was discontinued because of a slow decline in HBsAg, and TDF alone was used for maintenance therapy. Complete virological response, HBeAg and HBsAg seroconversion were observed at weeks 44, 96, and 122, respectively. After 24 weeks of consolidation therapy, HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV DNA were consistently negative, and hepatitis B surface antibody was 729.30 mIU/mL at week 146 of the combination therapy, then we stopped drugs. Following up after 28 weeks of cessation therapy, the patient still remained clinically cured.

A brief, highly selective history of acute phase proteins as indicators of infection, inflammation and injury

There is an array of plasma protein alterations that occur in a wide variety of species, including humans in response to trauma, inflammation and infections, seemingly irrespective of etiologic agent. In numerous species, these plasma proteins are part of the innate immune response. In addition, it appears that a number of the plasma proteins in this array can be predictive of morbidity and/or mortality. We propose that based on historic use, selected acute phase proteins should be included in ongoing and future non-clinical and clinical studies to help us better understand disease progression in chronic, as well as acute diseases. In addition to assess if there is a relationship between vaccine-induced inflammation and degree of protection from live, attenuated or synthetic vaccines.

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 before and after symptom onset: impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions in China

Nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as contact tracing and quarantine, have been the primary means of controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2; however, it remains uncertain which interventions are most effective at reducing transmission at the population level. Using serial interval data from before and after the rollout of nonpharmaceutical interventions in China, we estimate that the relative frequency of presymptomatic transmission increased from 34% before the rollout to 71% afterward. The shift toward earlier transmission indicates a disproportionate reduction in transmission post-symptom onset. We estimate that, following the rollout of nonpharmaceutical interventions, transmission post-symptom onset was reduced by 82% whereas presymptomatic transmission decreased by only 16%. The observation that only one-third of transmission was presymptomatic at baseline, combined with the finding that NPIs reduced presymptomatic transmission by less than 20%, suggests that the overall impact of NPIs was driven in large part by reductions in transmission following symptom onset. This implies that interventions which limit opportunities for transmission in the later stages of infection, such as contact tracing and isolation, are particularly important for control of SARS-CoV-2. Interventions which specifically reduce opportunities for presymptomatic transmission, such as quarantine of asymptomatic contacts, are likely to have smaller, but non-negligible, effects on overall transmission.