1
|
Kıratlı K, Aysin M, Ali MA, Ali AM, Zeybek H, Köse Ş. Evaluation of Doctors' Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviors, Awareness and Practices on Rational Antimicrobial Stewardship in a Training and Research Hospital in Mogadishu-Somalia. Infect Drug Resist 2024; 17:2759-2771. [PMID: 38984317 PMCID: PMC11231027 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s463197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Historically, antimicrobials have been used to treat microbial illnesses in humans and animals. But throughout this time, antibiotics that had been successful against particular microorganisms started to lose their effectiveness due to rising inappropriate use brought on by ignorance, negligent attitudes, and improper methods. Our goal in conducting this study was to ascertain the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of doctors with relation to the use of antibiotics in light of the growing global and Sub-Saharan African problem of antimicrobial resistance. Methods In a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia, a cross-sectional survey study was carried out to assess experts' and research assistants' knowledge, attitudes, behavior, awareness, and practices regarding the use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. A questionnaire consisting of 2 sections and 22 questions was applied to the participants on a voluntary basis. Results Among the 202 doctors that participated in the study, 49 (24.3%) were specialists, and 153 (75.7%) were assistants. Prescriptions for one to ten antibiotic boxes per week on average were reported by 146 respondents (72.3%). Of the physicians, just 27 (13.4%) did not require assistance when prescribing an antibiotic. The most often accessed sources of support were experts in infectious diseases (43.1%) and national/international antimicrobial guidelines (32.2%). The top three factors contributing to antibiotic resistance in Somalia include misuse of antibiotics (61.4%), unnecessary prescriptions written by doctors (44.6%), and an absence of infectious disease specialists in most institutions (44.1%). Conclusion As an alarming level of antimicrobial resistance has been observed globally in recent years, the results of our survey will help educate our doctors by gauging their perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge about rational antibiotic use in Sub-Saharan Africa. This will provide better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazım Kıratlı
- Mogadishu Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Mogadishu, Somalia
| | - Murat Aysin
- Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Balikesir, Turkey
| | - Mukhtar Abdullahi Ali
- Mogadishu Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Mogadishu, Somalia
| | - Ahmed Mohamed Ali
- Mogadishu Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Mogadishu, Somalia
| | - Hakan Zeybek
- Mogadishu Somalia Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Mogadishu, Somalia
| | - Şükran Köse
- Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gashegu M, Gahamanyi N, Ndayambaje FX, Munyemana JB, Ndahindwa V, Lukwago F, Ingabire L, Gambanga F, Gashema P, Tuyishime A, Dzinamarira T, Dukundane D, Muvunyi TZ, Muvunyi CM. Exploring Prescription Practices: Insights from an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Tertiary Healthcare Facility, Rwanda. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:548. [PMID: 38927214 PMCID: PMC11200619 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13060548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat linked to increased morbidity and mortality. It has the potential to return us to the pre-antibiotic era. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are recognized as a key intervention to improve antimicrobial use and combat AMR. However, implementation of AMS remains limited in Africa, particularly in Rwanda. This study aimed to assess prescription practices, identify areas for improvement, and promote adherence to AMS principles. Conducted at King Faisal Hospital in Rwanda, this qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with eight participants until saturation was reached. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed, revealing four emerging themes. The first theme was on AMS activities that were working well based on availability of microbiology laboratory results and prescription guidelines as factors influencing antibiotic prescription adjustments. The second theme was related to challenges during the implementation of the AMS program, including the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics, limited local data on AMR patterns, and stock-outs of essential antibiotics. The third theme was on the importance of adhering to AMR management guidelines at KFH. The last emerged on recommendations from participants centered on regular training for healthcare workers, widespread dissemination of AMR findings across departments, and the enforcement of antibiotic restriction policies. These actions can improve prescription behaviors, upholding the highest standards of patient care, and strengthening the nascent AMS program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misbah Gashegu
- Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7162, Rwanda; (M.G.); (N.G.); (A.T.)
| | - Noel Gahamanyi
- Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7162, Rwanda; (M.G.); (N.G.); (A.T.)
- Biology Department, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3900, Rwanda
| | - François Xavier Ndayambaje
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3286, Rwanda; (F.X.N.); (J.B.M.)
| | - Jean Bosco Munyemana
- Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3286, Rwanda; (F.X.N.); (J.B.M.)
| | - Vedaste Ndahindwa
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3286, Rwanda;
| | - Fredrick Lukwago
- King Faisal Hospital, Kigali P.O Box 2534, Rwanda; (F.L.); (L.I.); (D.D.)
| | - Lambert Ingabire
- King Faisal Hospital, Kigali P.O Box 2534, Rwanda; (F.L.); (L.I.); (D.D.)
| | - Fiona Gambanga
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, Kigali P.O. Box 4062, Rwanda;
| | - Pierre Gashema
- Repolicy Research Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7584, Rwanda;
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
| | - Albert Tuyishime
- Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7162, Rwanda; (M.G.); (N.G.); (A.T.)
| | - Tafadzwa Dzinamarira
- International Centre for AIDS Care and Treatment Program, ICAP, Lusaka P.O. Box 34358, Zambia;
| | - Damas Dukundane
- King Faisal Hospital, Kigali P.O Box 2534, Rwanda; (F.L.); (L.I.); (D.D.)
| | | | - Claude Mambo Muvunyi
- Rwanda Biomedical Centre, Kigali P.O. Box 7162, Rwanda; (M.G.); (N.G.); (A.T.)
- School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali P.O. Box 3286, Rwanda;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Woods B, Schmitt L, Jankovic D, Kearns B, Scope A, Ren S, Srivastava T, Ku CC, Hamilton J, Rothery C, Bojke L, Sculpher M, Harnan S. Cefiderocol for treating severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections: technology evaluation to inform a novel subscription-style payment model. Health Technol Assess 2024; 28:1-238. [PMID: 38938145 PMCID: PMC11229178 DOI: 10.3310/ygwr4511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background To limit the use of antimicrobials without disincentivising the development of novel antimicrobials, there is interest in establishing innovative models that fund antimicrobials based on an evaluation of their value as opposed to the volumes used. The aim of this project was to evaluate the population-level health benefit of cefiderocol in the NHS in England, for the treatment of severe aerobic Gram-negative bacterial infections when used within its licensed indications. The results were used to inform the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in support of commercial discussions regarding contract value between the manufacturer and NHS England. Methods The health benefit of cefiderocol was first derived for a series of high-value clinical scenarios. These represented uses that were expected to have a significant impact on patients' mortality risks and health-related quality of life. The clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol relative to its comparators was estimated by synthesising evidence on susceptibility of the pathogens of interest to the antimicrobials in a network meta-analysis. Patient-level costs and health outcomes of cefiderocol under various usage scenarios compared with alternative management strategies were quantified using decision modelling. Results were reported as incremental net health effects expressed in quality-adjusted life-years, which were scaled to 20-year population values using infection number forecasts based on data from Public Health England. The outcomes estimated for the high-value clinical scenarios were extrapolated to other expected uses for cefiderocol. Results Among Enterobacterales isolates with the metallo-beta-lactamase resistance mechanism, the base-case network meta-analysis found that cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.32, 95% credible intervals 0.04 to 2.47), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were also associated with lower susceptibility than colistin, but the results were not statistically significant. In the metallo-beta-lactamase Pseudomonas aeruginosa base-case network meta-analysis, cefiderocol was associated with a lower susceptibility relative to colistin (odds ratio 0.44, 95% credible intervals 0.03 to 3.94), but the result was not statistically significant. The other treatments were associated with no susceptibility. In the base case, patient-level benefit of cefiderocol was between 0.02 and 0.15 quality-adjusted life-years, depending on the site of infection, the pathogen and the usage scenario. There was a high degree of uncertainty surrounding the benefits of cefiderocol across all subgroups. There was substantial uncertainty in the number of infections that are suitable for treatment with cefiderocol, so population-level results are presented for a range of scenarios for the current infection numbers, the expected increases in infections over time and rates of emergence of resistance. The population-level benefits varied substantially across the base-case scenarios, from 896 to 3559 quality-adjusted life-years over 20 years. Conclusion This work has provided quantitative estimates of the value of cefiderocol within its areas of expected usage within the NHS. Limitations Given existing evidence, the estimates of the value of cefiderocol are highly uncertain. Future work Future evaluations of antimicrobials would benefit from improvements to NHS data linkages; research to support appropriate synthesis of susceptibility studies; and application of routine data and decision modelling to assess enablement value. Study registration No registration of this study was undertaken. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Policy Research Programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135591), conducted through the Policy Research Unit in Economic Methods of Evaluation in Health and Social Care Interventions, PR-PRU-1217-20401, and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 28. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Woods
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Dina Jankovic
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Benjamin Kearns
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Shijie Ren
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tushar Srivastava
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chu Chang Ku
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jean Hamilton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Claire Rothery
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Laura Bojke
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mark Sculpher
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Sue Harnan
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asiltürk D, Güner R, Kaya Kalem A, Özkoçak Turan I, Hasanoğlu I, Eser F, Malhan S, Kayaaslan B. Antibiotic management programme in a tertiary intensive care unit: effects of a carbapenem-restricted period on clinical and laboratory parameters and costs of infections. J Hosp Infect 2024; 148:87-94. [PMID: 38521418 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbapenems are antibiotics used for serious infections. The consumption of carbapenems has increased worldwide due to increasing microbial resistance. AIM To investigate the effects of a carbapenem-restricted antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on changes in the resistance profiles of infectious agents, the amount of antibiotics used, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), mortality, and costs. METHODS Patients hospitalized in ICU between July 1st, 2020 and May 1st, 2021 were divided into two periods: the carbapenem-non-restricted period (CNRP); and the carbapenem-restricted period (CRP) in which alternative antibiotics to carbapenems were preferred during infection. The defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient-day methodology was used to calculate the antibiotic consumption. FINDINGS Of the 572 patients included in the study, 62.2% were male, and mean age was 70.5 years. In the blood culture the most frequently Gram-negative agent was Acinetobacter baumannii (25%). A. baumannii bloodstream infections with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug resistant micro-organisms were significantly different between the two periods (CNRP: 95.6% (N = 22), CRP: 66.6% (N = 8); P = 0.04). There was a gradual decrease in the incidence density and rate of nosocomial infection (P = 0.06), and a significant decrease in meropenem consumption between the two periods (CNRP vs CRP: 21.19 vs 6.37 DDD per 100 patient-days respectively; P = 0.007). ASP yielded US$8,600 of antibiotic cost savings and a total of 14% patient cost savings (P < 0.05) per patient. CONCLUSION Combining an effective ASP with a comprehensive infection control programme may mitigate the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Asiltürk
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - R Güner
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - A Kaya Kalem
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Özkoçak Turan
- Anesthesia and Reanimation, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - I Hasanoğlu
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - F Eser
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - S Malhan
- Department of Health Care Management, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - B Kayaaslan
- Infection Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abdel Hadi H, Eltayeb F, Al Balushi S, Daghfal J, Ahmed F, Mateus C. Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:253. [PMID: 38534688 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13030253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamad Abdel Hadi
- Communicable Diseases Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha P.O. Box 3050, Qatar
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
| | - Faiha Eltayeb
- Division of Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha P.O. Box 3050, Qatar
| | - Sara Al Balushi
- Communicable Diseases Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha P.O. Box 3050, Qatar
| | - Joanne Daghfal
- Communicable Diseases Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha P.O. Box 3050, Qatar
| | - Faraz Ahmed
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
| | - Ceu Mateus
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kasanga M, Kwenda G, Wu J, Kasanga M, Mwikisa MJ, Chanda R, Mupila Z, Yankonde B, Sikazwe M, Mwila E, Shempela DM, Solochi BB, Phiri C, Mudenda S, Chanda D. Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns and Risk Factors Associated with ESBL-Producing and MDR Escherichia coli in Hospital and Environmental Settings in Lusaka, Zambia: Implications for One Health, Antimicrobial Stewardship and Surveillance Systems. Microorganisms 2023; 11:1951. [PMID: 37630511 PMCID: PMC10459584 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11081951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health problem threatening human, animal, and environmental safety. This study assessed the AMR profiles and risk factors associated with Escherichia coli in hospital and environmental settings in Lusaka, Zambia. This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2022 to August 2022 using 980 samples collected from clinical and environmental settings. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted using BD PhoenixTM 100. The data were analysed using SPSS version 26.0. Of the 980 samples, 51% were from environmental sources. Overall, 64.5% of the samples tested positive for E. coli, of which 52.5% were from clinical sources. Additionally, 31.8% were ESBL, of which 70.1% were clinical isolates. Of the 632 isolates, 48.3% were MDR. Most clinical isolates were resistant to ampicillin (83.4%), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (73.8%), and ciprofloxacin (65.7%) while all environmental isolates were resistant to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (100%) and some were resistant to levofloxacin (30.6%). The drivers of MDR in the tested isolates included pus (AOR = 4.6, CI: 1.9-11.3), male sex (AOR = 2.1, CI: 1.2-3.9), and water (AOR = 2.6, CI: 1.2-5.8). This study found that E. coli isolates were resistant to common antibiotics used in humans. The presence of MDR isolates is a public health concern and calls for vigorous infection prevention measures and surveillance to reduce AMR and its burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maisa Kasanga
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China (J.W.)
| | - Geoffrey Kwenda
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia;
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China (J.W.)
| | - Maika Kasanga
- Department of Pharmacy, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia;
| | - Mark J. Mwikisa
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia (B.B.S.)
| | - Raphael Chanda
- Adult Centre of Excellence, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia
| | - Zachariah Mupila
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia (B.B.S.)
| | - Baron Yankonde
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia (B.B.S.)
| | - Mutemwa Sikazwe
- Department of Pathology, Lusaka Trust Hospital, Lusaka 35852, Zambia
| | - Enock Mwila
- Department of Pathology, Lusaka Trust Hospital, Lusaka 35852, Zambia
| | - Doreen M. Shempela
- Churches Health Association of Zambia, Lusaka 34511, Zambia
- Department of Laboratory and Research, Central University of Nicaragua, Managua 12104, Nicaragua
| | - Benjamin B. Solochi
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia (B.B.S.)
| | - Christabel Phiri
- Department of Microbiology, School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
| | - Steward Mudenda
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
- Research and Surveillance Technical Working Group, Zambia National Public Health Institute, Lusaka 10101, Zambia
| | - Duncan Chanda
- Adult Centre of Excellence, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka 50110, Zambia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mokrani D, Chommeloux J, Pineton de Chambrun M, Hékimian G, Luyt CE. Antibiotic stewardship in the ICU: time to shift into overdrive. Ann Intensive Care 2023; 13:39. [PMID: 37148398 PMCID: PMC10163585 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a major health problem and will be probably one of the leading causes of deaths in the coming years. One of the most effective ways to fight against resistance is to decrease antibiotic consumption. Intensive care units (ICUs) are places where antibiotics are widely prescribed, and where multidrug-resistant pathogens are frequently encountered. However, ICU physicians may have opportunities to decrease antibiotics consumption and to apply antimicrobial stewardship programs. The main measures that may be implemented include refraining from immediate prescription of antibiotics when infection is suspected (except in patients with shock, where immediate administration of antibiotics is essential); limiting empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics (including anti-MRSA antibiotics) in patients without risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens; switching to monotherapy instead of combination therapy and narrowing spectrum when culture and susceptibility tests results are available; limiting the use of carbapenems to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and new beta-lactams to difficult-to-treat pathogen (when these news beta-lactams are the only available option); and shortening the duration of antimicrobial treatment, the use of procalcitonin being one tool to attain this goal. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should combine these measures rather than applying a single one. ICUs and ICU physicians should be at the frontline for developing antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Mokrani
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Juliette Chommeloux
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Marc Pineton de Chambrun
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Guillaume Hékimian
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Charles-Edouard Luyt
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, ICAN, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shamseddine J, Sadeq A, Yousuf K, Abukhater R, Yahya LO, Espil MA, Hassan ME, Fadl RE, Ahmed RTE, Elkonaissi I, Abdelsalam AE, Naqbi AA, Nuaimi NA, Hosani MA, Marri RA, Abdouli AA, Alakhras AM, Masri NIA, O’Sullivan S, Everett D, Babiker ZOE. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions on days of therapy and guideline adherence: A comparative point-prevalence survey assessment. FRONTIERS IN TROPICAL DISEASES 2023. [DOI: 10.3389/fitd.2022.1050344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is a crucial tool for rationalizing the use of antimicrobial agents and reducing the burden of antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to assess the impact of AMS interventions on antimicrobial utilization and adherence to antimicrobial guidelines.MethodsWe conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at a major tertiary hospital in the United Arab Emirates. Using standardized World Health Organization’s methodology, point-prevalence surveys (PPS) were performed in November 2019 and January 2022. Core AMS interventions consisted of proactive bloodstream infection service, proactive and reactive infectious diseases consult service, prospective audit and feedback by clinical pharmacists, development of antimicrobial guidelines based on cumulative antibiograms, and implementation of induction programs for new clinical staff. Days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days present and rate of compliance with antimicrobial guidelines were compared before and after the core interventions. Multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to adjust for the potential confounding effects of age, gender, hospitalization within 90 days, central or peripheral line insertion, urinary catheterization, and mechanical ventilation. P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsPre- and post-intervention PPSs included 292 and 370 patients, respectively. Both had similar age and gender distribution. Patients receiving antimicrobials were 51% (149/292) in 2019 and 45% (166/370) in 2022 (p 0.12). Univariate analysis showed a reduced post-intervention DOT per 1000 patients present (6.1 +/- 16.2 vs 2.4 +/-5.1, p<0.01) and an improved post-intervention guideline compliance (59% vs 67%, p 0.23). Following multiple logistic regression, the reduction in post-intervention DOT remained statistically significant (co-efficient -0.17 (95% CI -8.58 to -1.94, p<0.01), and the improvement in guideline adherence became statistically significant (adjusted odds ratio 1.91 (95% CI 1.05 to 3.45, p 0.03).ConclusionCoordinated and sustained AMS interventions have a significant impact on improving antimicrobial utilisation and adherence to guidelines.
Collapse
|
9
|
Swingler EA, Song M, Moore SE, Bohn BC, Schulz PS, Junkins AD, Wilde AM. Fluoroquinolone stewardship at a community health system: A decade in review. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY : ASHE 2022; 2:e186. [PMID: 36425222 PMCID: PMC9679733 DOI: 10.1017/ash.2022.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe inpatient fluoroquinolone use and susceptibility data over a 10-year period after the implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) led by an infectious diseases pharmacist starting in 2011. DESIGN Retrospective surveillance study. SETTING Large community health system. METHODS Fluoroquinolone use was quantified by days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days (PD) and reported quarterly. Use data are reported for inpatients from 2016 to 2020. Levofloxacin susceptibility is reported for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli for inpatients from 2011 to 2020 at a 4 adult-hospital health system. RESULTS Inpatient fluoroquinolone use decreased by 74% over a 5-year period, with an average decrease of 3.45 DOT per 1,000 PD per quarter (P < .001). Over a 10-year period, inpatient levofloxacin susceptibility increased by 57% for P. aeruginosa and by 15% for E. coli. P. aeruginosa susceptibility to levofloxacin increased by an average of 2.73% per year (P < .001) and had a strong negative correlation with fluoroquinolone use, r = -0.99 (P = .002). E. coli susceptibility to levofloxacin increased by an average of 1.33% per year (P < .001) and had a strong negative correlation with fluoroquinolone use, r = -0.95 (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS A substantial decrease in fluoroquinolone use and increase in P. aeruginosa and E. coli levofloxacin susceptibility was observed after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program. These results demonstrate the value of stewardship services and highlight the effectiveness of an infectious diseases pharmacist led antimicrobial stewardship program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena A. Swingler
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Matthew Song
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Sarah E. Moore
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Brian C. Bohn
- Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul S. Schulz
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Alan D. Junkins
- Department of Microbiology, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Ashley M. Wilde
- Norton Infectious Diseases Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Duan L, Liu C, Wang D, Lin R, Qian P, Zhang X, Liu C. The vicious cycle of the public's irrational use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: A mixed methods systematic review. Front Public Health 2022; 10:985188. [PMID: 36339167 PMCID: PMC9632431 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The public's irrational use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) is prevalent worldwide. This study aims to synthesize evidence on how people use antibiotics to treat URTIs, its prevalence and determinants. Methods A mixed methods systematic review was conducted using a convergent segregated approach. Relevant studies were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. A qualitative analysis was initiated, exploring the public's antibiotic use experience for URTIS based on the Consumer Behavior Model (CBM). This was followed by a quantitative synthesis, tapping into the prevalence and predictors of public behavior in antibiotic usage for URTIs. The segregated syntheses complemented each other and were further integrated. Results A total of 86 studies were included: 48 quantitative, 30 qualitative, eight mixed methods studies. The included studies were conducted in Europe (n = 29), Asia (n = 27) and North America (n = 21), assessing the behaviors of patients (n = 46), their parents or caregivers (n = 31), or both (n = 9). Eleven themes emerged covering the six CBM stages: need recognition, information searching, alternative evaluation, antibiotic obtaining, antibiotic consumption, and post-consumption evaluation. The six stages reinforce each other, forming a vicious cycle. The high prevalence of the public's irrational use of antibiotics for URTIs is evident despite the high heterogeneity of the studies (ranging from 0.0 to 92.7%). The perceived seriousness of illness and misbelief in antibiotics were identified consistently across the studies as the major motivation driving the public's irrational use of antibiotics for URTIs. However, individual capacity (e.g., knowledge) and opportunity (e.g., contextual restriction) in reducing antibiotic use have mixed effect. Conclusion Systemic interventions concerning both supply and demand sides are warranted. The public needs to be educated about the appropriate management of URTIs and health care providers need to re-shape public attitudes toward antibiotic use for URTIs through communication and prescribing practices. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42021266407.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lixia Duan
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chaojie Liu
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dan Wang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Rujiao Lin
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Pan Qian
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinping Zhang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chenxi Liu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siachalinga L, Mufwambi W, Lee LH. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Hospital Inpatients in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 2022; 129:124-143. [PMID: 35970382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions to improve antibiotic use are being implemented in Africa, but their impact is not fully known. AIM To estimate the effectiveness of interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing for hospital inpatients. METHODS Systematically searched for studies from PubMed, Embase, African Journals online and Google scholar from January 2010 to July 2022. Studies were included if they reported the impact of AMS interventions on outcomes of interest for hospital inpatients in Africa. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care guidelines and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool. Findings were summarized in tables and meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. FINDINGS Twenty-eight studies were included, 89% being uncontrolled before and after studies. Most interventions employed were multifaceted and found to be effective, evidenced by increased compliance, reduction in antibiotic utilization and cost, and slight reduction or no difference in mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). Meta-analysis generated a relative risk of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.70∼0.97) for mortality, and a standard mean difference of -0.30 (95% CI: -0.41∼-0.19) for LOS. Generally, a decrease in resistance to most microorganisms was observed. Despite an increase in the number of AMS studies conducted in Africa, the studies lack in most quality design features for AMS studies. CONCLUSION Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are likely to be effective, however efforts are still required to align the study design with the quality design features required for validity and to inform practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Siachalinga
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea
| | - Webrod Mufwambi
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, 50110, Zambia
| | - Lyn-Hyang Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Naito Y, Maeda M, Nagatomo Y, Ugajin K, Akima E, Tanaka M, Tokimatsu I, Sasaki T. Impact of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Team Intervention Focusing on Changes in Prescribing Trends and the Rate of Carbapenem-resistant <i>P. aeruginosa</i>. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI 2022; 142:527-534. [DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.21-00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuika Naito
- Department of Hospital Pharmaceutics, Showa University School of Pharmacy
| | - Masayuki Maeda
- Division of Infection Control Sciences, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Showa University School of Pharmacy
| | - Yasuhiro Nagatomo
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Showa University Hospital
| | - Kazuhisa Ugajin
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Showa University Hospital
| | - Etsuko Akima
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Showa University Hospital
| | - Michiko Tanaka
- Department of Hospital Pharmaceutics, Showa University School of Pharmacy
| | - Issei Tokimatsu
- Division of Infection Diseases, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Burton E, O’Driscoll M, Fleming A. The protected antimicrobial process in a University Teaching Hospital: a qualitative interview study exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of healthcare professionals. Int J Clin Pharm 2022; 44:630-640. [PMID: 35124762 PMCID: PMC9200682 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01381-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractBackground The protected or restricted supply of certain antimicrobials such as linezolid, caspofungin, aztreonam, in the acute hospital setting is an important element of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) programmes to address the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance. This process involves submitting an application for use to be reviewed typically by a Consultant Microbiologist, Infectious Disease Consultant or Antimicrobial Pharmacist. Aim To investigate healthcare professionals’ knowledge, experiences, and attitudes towards the protected/restricted antimicrobials process in order to identify possible methods of optimisation and improvement. Method Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in the protected/restricted antimicrobial prescribing, dispensing and administration process were conducted in September–October 2019 in a 350-bed voluntary, general, acute hospital in Ireland. Interviews were analysed by the Framework method and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Results Interviews were conducted with 8 Doctors, 4 Pharmacists and 3 Nurses. TDF domains identified included: ‘Knowledge’; ‘Social/professional role and identity’; ‘Social influences’; ‘Memory, attention and decision processes’; ‘Beliefs about consequences’; ‘Environmental contexts and resources’. The relationship between prescribers and the AMS Team was reported as a facilitator of the process, whereas the inconsistency of the filing and versions of forms on the wards were seen as challenges. Conclusion The results of this study have shown that the existing protected/restricted antimicrobial process is a multi-disciplinary effort with barriers that require attention in order to make future improvements. Standardization of the form across all wards, an electronic version of the form, and structured education around AMS were suggested to optimize the process.
Collapse
|
14
|
Kell DB. The Transporter-Mediated Cellular Uptake and Efflux of Pharmaceutical Drugs and Biotechnology Products: How and Why Phospholipid Bilayer Transport Is Negligible in Real Biomembranes. Molecules 2021; 26:5629. [PMID: 34577099 PMCID: PMC8470029 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the years, my colleagues and I have come to realise that the likelihood of pharmaceutical drugs being able to diffuse through whatever unhindered phospholipid bilayer may exist in intact biological membranes in vivo is vanishingly low. This is because (i) most real biomembranes are mostly protein, not lipid, (ii) unlike purely lipid bilayers that can form transient aqueous channels, the high concentrations of proteins serve to stop such activity, (iii) natural evolution long ago selected against transport methods that just let any undesirable products enter a cell, (iv) transporters have now been identified for all kinds of molecules (even water) that were once thought not to require them, (v) many experiments show a massive variation in the uptake of drugs between different cells, tissues, and organisms, that cannot be explained if lipid bilayer transport is significant or if efflux were the only differentiator, and (vi) many experiments that manipulate the expression level of individual transporters as an independent variable demonstrate their role in drug and nutrient uptake (including in cytotoxicity or adverse drug reactions). This makes such transporters valuable both as a means of targeting drugs (not least anti-infectives) to selected cells or tissues and also as drug targets. The same considerations apply to the exploitation of substrate uptake and product efflux transporters in biotechnology. We are also beginning to recognise that transporters are more promiscuous, and antiporter activity is much more widespread, than had been realised, and that such processes are adaptive (i.e., were selected by natural evolution). The purpose of the present review is to summarise the above, and to rehearse and update readers on recent developments. These developments lead us to retain and indeed to strengthen our contention that for transmembrane pharmaceutical drug transport "phospholipid bilayer transport is negligible".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas B. Kell
- Department of Biochemistry and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown St, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK;
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Building 220, Kemitorvet, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
- Mellizyme Biotechnology Ltd., IC1, Liverpool Science Park, Mount Pleasant, Liverpool L3 5TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
How fluoroquinolone preauthorization affects third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin use and resistance in a large academic hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021; 43:848-859. [PMID: 34233769 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We observed an overall increase in the use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins after fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented. We examined the change in specific third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin use, and we sought to determine whether there was a consequent change in non-susceptibility of select Gram-negative bacterial isolates to these antibiotics. DESIGN Retrospective quasi-experimental study. SETTING Academic hospital. INTERVENTION Fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented in the hospital in October 2005. We used interrupted time series (ITS) Poisson regression models to examine trends in monthly rates of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime use and trends in yearly rates of nonsusceptible isolates (NSIs) of select Gram-negative bacteria before (1998-2004) and after (2006-2016) fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented. RESULTS Rates of use of ceftriaxone and cefepime increased after fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented (ceftriaxone RR, 1.002; 95% CI, 1.002-1.003; P < .0001; cefepime RR, 1.003; 95% CI, 1.001-1.004; P = .0006), but ceftazidime use continued to decline (RR, 0.991, 95% CI, 0.990-0.992; P < .0001). Rates of ceftazidime and cefepime NSIs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftazidime RR, 0.937; 95% CI, 0.910-0.965, P < .0001; cefepime RR, 0.937; 95% CI, 0.912-0.963; P < .0001) declined after fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented. Rates of ceftazidime and cefepime NSIs of Enterobacter cloacae (ceftazidime RR, 1.116; 95% CI, 1.078-1.154; P < .0001; cefepime RR, 1.198; 95% CI, 1.112-1.291; P < .0001) and cefepime NSI of Acinetobacter baumannii (RR, 1.169; 95% CI, 1.081-1.263; P < .0001) were increasing before fluoroquinolone preauthorization was implemented but became stable thereafter: E. cloacae (ceftazidime RR, 0.987; 95% CI, 0.948-1.028; P = .531; cefepime RR, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.962-1.018; P = .461) and A. baumannii (cefepime RR, 0.972; 95% CI, 0.939-1.006; P = .100). CONCLUSIONS Fluoroquinolone preauthorization may increase use of unrestricted third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins; however, we did not observe increased antimicrobial resistance to these agents, especially among clinically important Gram-negative bacteria known for hospital-acquired infections.
Collapse
|