Use of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing to Identify Pathogens in Pediatric Osteoarticular Infections

Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing for Pathogen Detection and Quantification in Children With Musculoskeletal Infections

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of all pediatric musculoskeletal infections (MSKIs) are culture negative. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing is noninvasive and not prone to the barriers of culture. We evaluated the performance of plasma mcfDNA sequencing in identifying a pathogen, and examined the duration of pathogen detection in children with MSKIs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of children, aged 6 months to 18 years, hospitalized from July 2019 to May 2022 with MSKIs, in whom we obtained serial plasma mcfDNA sequencing samples and compared the results with cultures.

RESULTS

A pathogen was recovered by culture in 23 of 34 (68%) participants, and by initial mcfDNA sequencing in 25 of 31 (81%) participants. Multiple pathogens were detected in the majority (56%) of positive initial samples. Complete concordance with culture (all organisms accounted for by both methods) was 32%, partial concordance (at least one of the same organism(s) identified by both methods) was 36%, and discordance was 32%. mcfDNA sequencing was more likely to show concordance (complete or partial) if obtained prior to a surgical procedure (82%), compared with after (20%), (RR 4.12 [95% CI 1.25, 22.93], p = .02). There was no difference in concordance based on timing of antibiotics (presample antibiotics 60% vs no antibiotics 75%, RR 0.8 [95% CI 0.40, 1.46], p = .65]). mcfDNA sequencing was positive in 67% of culture-negative infections and detected a pathogen for a longer interval than blood culture (median 2 days [IQR 1, 6 days] vs 1 day [1, 1 day], p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma mcfDNA sequencing may be useful in culture-negative pediatric MSKIs if the sample is obtained prior to surgery. However, results must be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context as multiple pathogens are frequently detected supporting the need for diagnostic stewardship.

Clinical Practice Guideline by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA): 2023 Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Arthritis in Pediatrics

This clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial arthritis (ABA) in children was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for children with ABA, including specialists in pediatric infectious diseases and orthopedics. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA in children. The panel followed a systematic process used in the development of other IDSA and PIDS clinical practice guidelines, which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (see Figure 1). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text.

Laboratory diagnostics for primary spinal infections in pediatric and adult populations: a narrative review

Primary spinal infection (PSI) is a generic term covering a heterogeneous group of infections that can affect the vertebral body, intervertebral disks, the content of the medullary cavity, and adjacent paraspinal tissues. Patients' characteristics can vary significantly, notably according to their age, and some of these characteristics undoubtedly play a primordial role in the occurrence of a PSI and in the type of offending pathogen. Before approaching the subject of laboratory diagnostics, it is essential to define the characteristics of the patient and their infection, which can then guide the physician toward specific diagnostic approaches. This review critically examined the roles and usefulness of traditional and modern laboratory diagnostics in supporting clinicians' decision-making in cases of pediatric and adult primary spinal infection (PSI). It appears impossible to compare PSIs in children and adults, whether from an epidemiological, clinical, bacteriological, or biological perspective. The recipients are really too different, and the responsible germs are closely correlated to their age. Secondly, the interpretation of traditional laboratory blood tests appears to contribute little guidance for clinicians attempting to diagnose a PSI. Biopsy or needle aspiration for bacterial identification remains a controversial subject, as the success rates of these procedures for identifying causative organisms are relatively uncertain in pediatric populations.Using nucleic acid amplification assays (NAAAs) on biopsy samples has been demonstrated to be more sensitive than conventional cultures for diagnosing PSI. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) are particularly interesting for establishing a microbiological diagnosis of a PSI when standard cultures and NAAAs have failed to detect the culprit. We can even imagine that plasma metagenomic NGS using plasma (known as "liquid biopsy") is a diagnostic approach that can detect not only pathogens circulating in the bloodstream but also those causing focal infections, and thus eliminate the need for source sample collection using costly invasive surgical procedures.

Debridement-Reconstruction-Docking Management System Versus Ilizarov Technique for Lower-Extremity Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis causes marked disability and is one of the most challenging diseases for orthopaedists to treat because of the considerable rate of infection recurrence. In this study, we proposed and assessed the debridement-reconstruction-docking (DRD) system for the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis. This procedure comprises 3 surgical stages and 2 preoperative assessments; namely, pre-debridement assessment, debridement, pre-reconstruction assessment, reconstruction, and docking-site management. We evaluated the use of the DRD system compared with the Ilizarov technique, which is defined as a 1-stage debridement, osteotomy, and bone transport.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 289 patients who underwent either DRD or the Ilizarov technique for the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis at a single institution between January 2013 and February 2021 and who met the eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the rate of infection recurrence. Secondary outcomes included the external fixator index (EFI), refracture rate, and the Paley classification for osseous and functional results. An inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment model was utilized to estimate the effect of the DRD system and Ilizarov technique on the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis.

RESULTS

A total of 131 and 158 patients underwent DRD or the Ilizarov technique, respectively. The inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment model suggested that DRD was associated with a significant reduction in infection recurrence (risk ratio [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.50; p < 0.001) and EFI (-6.9 days/cm, 95% CI; -8.3 to -5.5; p < 0.001). Patients in the DRD group had better Paley functional results than those in the Ilizarov group (ridit score, 0.55 versus 0.45; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of refracture (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.79; p = 0.71) and Paley osseous results (ridit score, 0.51 versus 0.49; p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

In this balanced retrospective cohort of patients with lower-extremity osteomyelitis, the use of the DRD system was associated with a reduced rate of infection recurrence, a lower EFI, and better Paley functional results compared with the use of the Ilizarov technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Clinical Evaluation of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the detection of pathogens in BALF in severe community acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Rapid and accurate identification of pathogens is very important for the treatment of Severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in children. Metagenomic Next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been applied in the detection of pathogenic bacteria in recent years, while the overall evaluation the application of SCAP in children is lacking.

METHODS

In our study, 84 cases of SCAP were enrolled. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were analysed using mNGS; and sputum, blood, and BALF samples were analysed using conventional technology (CT).

RESULTS

Among the 84 children, 41 were boys, and 43 were girls, with an average age ranging from 2 months to 14 years. The pathogen detection rate of mNGS was higher than that of CT (83.3% [70/84] vs. 63.1% [53/84], P = 0.003). The mNGS was much greater than that of the CT in detecting Streptococcus pneumoniae (89.2% [25/29] vs. 44.8% [13/29], P = 0.001) and Haemophilus influenzae (91.7% [11/12] vs. 33.3% [4/12], P < 0.005). The mNGS also showed superior fungal detection performance compared with that of the CT (81.8% [9/11] vs. 18.2% [2/11], P = 0.004). The mNGS test can detect viruses, such as bocavirus, rhinovirus, and human metapneumovirus, which are not frequently recognised using CT. However, the mNGS detection rate was lower than that of the CT (52.4% [11/21] vs. 95.2% [20/21], P = 0.004) for Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP). The detection rate of mNGS for mixed infection was greater than that of the CT, although statistical significance was not observed (26.3% [20/39] vs. 21.1% [16/39], P > 0.005). Treatment for 26 (31.0%) children was changed based on mNGS results, and their symptoms were reduced; nine patients had their antibiotic modified, five had antibiotics added, nine had their antifungal medication, and seven had their antiviral medication.

CONCLUSION

mNGS has unique advantages in the detection of SCAP pathogens in children, especially S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and fungi. However, the detection rate of MP using mNGS was lower than that of the CT. Additionally, mNGS can detect pathogens that are not generally covered by CT, which is extremely important for the modification of the treatment strategy.

Deciphering Microbiota of Acute Upper Respiratory Infections: A Comparative Analysis of PCR and mNGS Methods for Lower Respiratory Trafficking Potential

Although it is clinically important for acute respiratory tract (co)infections to have a rapid and accurate diagnosis, it is critical that respiratory medicine understands the advantages of current laboratory methods. In this study, we tested nasopharyngeal samples (n = 29) with a commercially available PCR assay and compared the results with those of a hybridization-capture-based mNGS workflow. Detection criteria for positive PCR samples was Ct < 35 and for mNGS samples it was >40% target coverage, median depth of 1X and RPKM > 10. A high degree of concordance (98.33% PPA and 100% NPA) was recorded. However, mNGS yielded positively 29 additional microorganisms (23 bacteria, 4 viruses, and 2 fungi) beyond PCR. We then characterized the microorganisms of each method into three phenotypic categories using the IDbyDNA Explify^® Platform (Illumina^® Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) for consideration of infectivity and trafficking potential to the lower respiratory region. The findings are significant for providing a comprehensive yet clinically relevant microbiology profile of acute upper respiratory infection, especially important in immunocompromised or immunocompetent with comorbidity respiratory cases or where traditional syndromic approaches fail to identify pathogenicity. Accordingly, this technology can be used to supplement current syndrome-based tests, and data can quickly and effectively be phenotypically characterized for trafficking potential, clinical (co)infection, and comorbid consideration-with promise to reduce morbidity and mortality.

The diagnostic value of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis

Aims

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of blood metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from patients clinically diagnosed as acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO).

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 66 patients with AHO. The test results of mNGS and bacterial culture on different samples, including blood and puncture fluid samples, from patients with AHO were compared to explore the diagnostic value of blood mNGS. Besides, this study also explored the efficacy of blood mNGS in decision making for antibiotic administration and analyzed the factors associated with the positive result of blood mNGS.

Results

The most common causative pathogens were Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. The sensitivity of blood mNGS (77.3%) was higher than that of blood culture (42.4%) (P<0.001), while the turnaround time of blood mNGS (2.1 ± 0.4 d) is much less than that of blood culture (6.0 ± 2.1 d) (P<0.001). Besides, the sensitivity of blood mNGS tests (77.3%) was slightly lower than that of puncture fluid mNGS (89.4%). Furthermore, detection comparison at pathogen level unravels that blood mNGS might be suitable for diagnosing AHO caused by common pathogens, while puncture fluid mNGS could be considered as preferred examination in diagnosing AHO caused by uncommon pathogens. Finally, three independent factors associated with the true positive result of blood mNGS in patients with AHO were identified, including Gram-positive pathogens (OR=24.4, 95% CI = 1.4-421.0 for Staphylococcus; OR=14.9, 95%CI= 1.6-136.1 for other Gram-positive bacteria), body temperature at sampling time (OR=8.2, 95% CI = 0.6-107.3 for body temperature of >38.5°C; OR=17.2, 95% CI = 2.0-149.1 for patients who were chilling), and no use of antibiotics before sampling (OR=8.9, 95% CI =1.4-59.0).

Conclusion

This is the first report on evaluating and emphasizing the importance of blood mNGS in diagnosing AHO. Blood sample might be an alternative sample for puncture fluid for mNGS, and its extensive application in diagnosing AHO could be expected.

The Past, Present, and Future of Kingella kingae Detection in Pediatric Osteoarthritis

As a result of the increasing use of improved detection methods, Kingella kingae, a Gram-negative component of the pediatric oropharyngeal microbiota, is increasingly appreciated as the prime etiology of septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and spondylodiscitis in children aged 6 to 48 months. The medical literature was reviewed to summarize the laboratory methods required for detecting the organism. Kingella kingae is notoriously fastidious, and seeding skeletal system samples onto solid culture media usually fails to isolate it. Inoculation of synovial fluid aspirates and bone exudates into blood culture vials enhances Kingella kingae recovery by diluting detrimental factors in the specimen. The detection of the species has been further improved by nucleic acid amplification tests, especially by using species-specific primers targeting Kingella kingae's rtxA, groEL, and mdh genes in a real-time PCR platform. Although novel metagenomic next-generation technology performed in the patient's plasma sample (liquid biopsy) has not yet reached its full potential, improvements in the sensitivity and specificity of the method will probably make this approach the primary means of diagnosing Kingella kingae infections in the future.

Enhancing Diagnostics in Orthopedic Infections

Accurate diagnosis of orthopedic infection is crucial in guiding both antimicrobial therapy and surgical management in order to optimize patient outcomes. A variety of microbiological and nonmicrobiological methods are used to establish the presence of a musculoskeletal infection. In this minireview, we examine traditional culture-based and newer molecular methodologies for pathogen detection, as well as systemic and localized assays to assess host response to maximize diagnostic yield.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis: A Review of the Literature With a Focus on Pediatrics

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel tool for identifying microbial DNA and/or RNA in blood and other clinical specimens. In the face of increasingly complex patients and an ever-growing list of known potential pathogens, mNGS has been proposed as a breakthrough tool for unbiased pathogen identification. Studies have begun to explore the clinical applicability of mNGS in a variety of settings, including endocarditis, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, osteoarticular infections, and returning travelers. The real-world impact of mNGS has also been assessed through retrospective studies, documenting varying degrees of success and limitations. In this review, we will explore current highlights of the clinical mNGS literature, with a focus on pediatric data where available. We aim to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of mNGS and to provide direction toward areas requiring further research.