Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases: Results From a Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter National Registry

A global perspective of the changing epidemiology of invasive fungal disease and real-world experience with the use of isavuconazole

Global epidemiological data show that the incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) has increased in recent decades, with the rising frequency of infections caused by Aspergillus and Mucorales order species. The number and variety of patients at risk of IFD has also expanded, owing in part to advances in the treatment of hematologic malignancies and other serious diseases, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) and other therapies causing immune suppression. Isavuconazonium sulfate (active moiety: isavuconazole) is an advanced-generation triazole antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis that has demonstrated activity against a variety of yeasts, moulds, and dimorphic fungi. While real-world clinical experience with isavuconazole is sparse in some geographic regions, it has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in diverse patient populations, including those with multiple comorbidities who may have failed to respond to prior triazole antifungal therapy. Isavuconazole may be suitable for patients with IFD receiving concurrent QTc-prolonging therapy, as well as those on venetoclax or ruxolitinib. Data from clinical trials are not available to support the use of isavuconazole prophylactically for the prevention of IFD or for the treatment of endemic IFD, such as those caused by Histoplasma spp., but real-world evidence from case studies suggests that it has clinical utility in these settings. Isavuconazole is an option for patients at risk of IFD, particularly when the use of alternative antifungal therapies is not possible because of toxicities, pharmacokinetics, or drug interactions.

Infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

Infectious complications are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preventing infections could significantly improve both survival and quality of life. Unfortunately, both infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with MDS are incompletely assessed due to the heterogeneity of disorders included in each publication, changing definitions over time, and lack of standardized prophylaxis practices. Despite these limitations, some basic statements can be made. Infections in MDS are associated with neutropenia. Patients with lower-risk (LR) MDS tend to have fewer infections compared to patients with higher-risk (HR) MDS, which may be related to the different prevalence of neutropenia in the 2 groups. Pneumonia is the most common infection, and bacteria are the most common pathogens. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are uncommon. Reactivation of latent viruses are rare. With the limited data available, we agree that antibacterial prophylaxis can be considered in patients with HR-MDS during severe neutropenia and early cycles of therapy when infections are most likely to occur. Given the low prevalence of IFI and viral reactivation, antimicrobial prophylaxis for these pathogens is less likely to be advantageous for most patients, although antifungal prophylaxis with activity against mold is commonly used in patients with persistent, profound neutropenia. Ultimately, improved data collection regarding infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis is needed to improve care for patients with MDS.

Impact of Antifungal Prophylaxis Continuation or Discontinuation After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant on the Incidence of Invasive Mold Infection

Background

Continuing antifungal prophylaxis (AFPx) to prevent invasive mold infections (IMIs) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after primary hospital discharge from alloHCT admission varies among transplant centers despite recommendations to continue prophylaxis through day +75. Characteristics driving AFPx prescribing at hospital discharge and outcomes are unknown.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed patients continuing AFPx vs no AFPx at hospital discharge. We included patients with a hospital stay ≥7 days and ≤40 days. We excluded patients with a history of IMI prior to alloHCT, new IMI during admission, or death prior to discharge. Our primary objective was incidence of probable or proven IMI per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Our secondary objectives were nonrelapse mortality at day +100, overall survival at day +100, and characteristics driving AFPx discontinuation at hospital discharge.

Results

Of the 430 patients identified, 387 met inclusion criteria. At discharge, 56% (217/387) continued AFPx, and 44% (170/387) had no AFPx. At day +100, 3 probable IMI cases occurred in the group with continued AFPx vs 1 probable IMI case in the no-AFPx group (no proven IMI). Univariate analysis showed no difference in cumulative incidence of probable IMI (P = .440), nonrelapse mortality (P = .072), and overall survival (P = .855) between groups. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that patients were less likely to continue AFPx if they had a diagnosis other than acute myeloid leukemia, a length of stay ≤30 days, acute graft-vs-host disease grade 0 or 1, and corticosteroid use ≤5 days.

Conclusions

There was no difference in probable IMI at day +100 after alloHCT based on continuing vs discontinuing AFPx at hospital discharge after alloHCT admission supporting a risk-adapted prophylaxis approach.

Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients With High-Risk Hematological Disorders Receiving Voriconazole and Posaconazole Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Primary antifungal prophylaxis with mold-active azoles is used to prevent invasive fungal infections in patients with high-risk hematological disorders; however, breakthrough infections occur, and the reasons for treatment failure are still not fully understood. To help inform clinical decisions, we sought to define microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological characteristics of proven and probable breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) in patients with high-risk hematological disorders receiving voriconazole or posaconazole prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search strategy was last conducted on 19 April 2023.

RESULTS

We assessed 5293 studies for eligibility, and 300 were selected for data extraction. These studies described 1076 cases of bIFIs occurring under voriconazole (42.5%) or posaconazole (57.5%). The most commonly found pathogens were Aspergillus (40%), Mucorales (20%), Candida (18%), and Fusarium (9%) species. Mucorales were more frequent among voriconazole-emerging cases, whereas Aspergillus and Fusarium were more prevalent among posaconazole-emerging cases. Definitive, putative, or probable antifungal resistance was found in 31% of cases. Therapeutic drug monitoring showed subtherapeutic azole concentration in 32 of 90 (36%) cases. Infection-related mortality was reported in 117 cases and reached 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our systemic review, the most common bIFIs were aspergillosis, mucormycosis, candidiasis, and fusariosis. Antifungal resistance explains only a minority of cases. Subtherapeutic prophylaxis was frequent but rarely reported. Prospective studies are needed to better understand these infections and to establish optimal management.

The performance of bronchoalveolar lavage Aspergillus PCR testing in solid organ transplant recipients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

BACKGROUND

Invasive aspergillosis affects solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, carrying a high risk of mortality and morbidity in this population. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential to ensure the initiation of correct antifungal therapy. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) Eurofins Viracor Aspergillus PCR (AspPCR) in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in SOT recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of SOT recipients in Arizona from February 2019 to December 2022 who had AspPCR done at the time of the clinical encounter. Probable IPA was defined as a positive BAL culture with Aspergillus spp. with clinical and imaging findings of IPA per EORTC/MSGERC criteria.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine SOT recipients with 131 encounters with BAL AspPCR testing were included. The median age was 66, the majority were White, non-Hispanics (60%), and males (66%). Among the participants, 93 lung transplant recipients with 87 of the encounters received antifungal prophylaxis active against Aspergillus spp. Sixty-four encounters had BAL galactomannan (GM), all of which had BAL GM <1 OD, and one case had a serum GM of 10 OD. Nine cases met the definition of IPA. The sensitivity of the BAL AspPCR was 67% (95% CI 30%-93%), and the specificity was 98% (95% CI 93%-99%).

CONCLUSION

BAL AspPCR had moderate sensitivity and high specificity in identifying IPA in our cohort of SOT recipients. Further studies in populations with a higher prevalence of IPA are needed to evaluate the performance of this test.

The Burden of Invasive Fungal Disease Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy and Strategies for Prevention

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a novel immunotherapy approved for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. This therapy leads to a variety of immunologic deficits that could place patients at risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). Studies assessing IFD in this setting are limited by inconsistent definitions and heterogeneity in prophylaxis use, although the incidence of IFD after CAR T-cell therapy, particularly for lymphoma and myeloma, appears to be low. This review evaluates the incidence of IFD after CAR T-cell therapy, and discusses optimal approaches to prevention, highlighting areas that require further study as well as future applications of cellular therapy that may impact IFD risk. As the use of CAR T-cell therapy continues to expand for hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and most recently to include non-oncologic diseases, understanding the risk for IFD in this uniquely immunosuppressed population is imperative to prevent morbidity and mortality.

High-Risk Neutropenic Fever and Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with Hematological Malignancies

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) still represent a relevant cause of mortality in patients affected by hematological malignancies, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy, and in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP) has been established as a standard of care. However, breakthrough IFDs (b-IFDs) have emerged as a significant issue, particularly invasive aspergillosis and non-Aspergillus invasive mold diseases. Here, we perform a narrative review, discussing the major advances of the last decade on prophylaxis, the diagnosis of and the treatment of IFDs in patients with high-risk neutropenic fever undergoing remission induction chemotherapy for AML/MDS and allo-HSCT. Then, we present our single-center retrospective experience on b-IFDs in 184 AML/MDS patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy while receiving posaconazole (n = 153 induction treatments, n = 126 consolidation treatments, n = 60 salvage treatments). Six cases of probable/proven b-IFDs were recorded in six patients, with an overall incidence rate of 1.7% (6/339), which is in line with the literature focused on MAP with azoles. The incidence rates (IRs) of b-IFDs (95% confidence interval (95% CI), per 100 person years follow-up (PYFU)) were 5.04 (0.47, 14.45) in induction (n = 2), 3.25 (0.0013, 12.76) in consolidation (n = 1) and 18.38 (3.46, 45.06) in salvage chemotherapy (n = 3). Finally, we highlight the current challenges in the field of b-IFDs; these include the improvement of diagnoses, the expanding treatment landscape of AML with molecular targeted drugs (and related drug-drug interactions with azoles), evolving transplantation techniques (and their related impacts on IFDs' risk stratification), and new antifungals and their features (rezafungin and olorofim).

Approach to diagnostic evaluation and prevention of invasive fungal disease in patients prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

In recent years, advancements in the treatment landscape for hematological malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, have significantly improved disease prognosis and overall survival. However, the treatment landscape is changing and the emergence of targeted oral therapies and immune-based treatments has brought forth new challenges in evaluating and preventing invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). IFD disproportionately affects immunocompromised hosts, particularly those undergoing therapy for acute leukemia and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pretransplant workup, identification, and prevention of IFD in patients with hematological malignancy. The pretransplant period offers a critical window to assess each patient's risk factors and implement appropriate prophylactic measures. Risk assessment includes evaluation of disease, host, prior treatments, and environmental factors, allowing a dynamic evaluation that considers disease progression and treatment course. Diagnostic screening, involving various biomarkers and radiological modalities, plays a crucial role in early detection of IFD. Antifungal prophylaxis choice is based on available evidence as well as individual risk assessment, potential for drug-drug interactions, toxicity, and patient adherence. Therapeutic drug monitoring ensures effective antifungal stewardship and optimal treatment. Patient education and counselling are vital in minimizing environmental exposures to fungal pathogens and promoting medication adherence. A well-structured and individualized approach, encompassing risk assessment, prophylaxis, surveillance, and patient education, is essential for effectively preventing IFD in hematological malignancies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and overall survival.