Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Safety in Elderly Adults

Safety of concomitant administration of 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine and influenza vaccine among the elderly

BACKGROUND

The current recommendation for the elderly is to receive both a single dose 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV-23) and an annual inactivated influenza vaccine. There is a lack of post-marketing safety studies on concomitant vaccination using real-world data. We aimed to evaluate the safety of administering PPSV-23 and influenza vaccine concomitantly versus sequentially.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using a linked database that combines vaccination registry from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and claims data from the National Health Insurance Service. The study population included all those aged over 65 who received PPSV-23 at least once from Jan 1, 2016, to Dec 31, 2020. This study evaluated the 16 prespecified events of interest. Concomitant vaccination was defined as receiving both PPSV-23 and influenza vaccine on the same day. For sequential vaccination, we defined it as receiving influenza vaccination during the period from 30 to 365 days prior to the date of PPSV-23 injection. We performed 1:4 propensity score matching and estimated adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) using conditional Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Of the 2,885,144 elderly patients who received PPSV-23 vaccination at least once from Jan 1, 2016, to Dec 31, 2020, a total 87,899 were included in the concomitant vaccination group and 1,200,091 were included in the sequential vaccination group. After adjusting for confounders, the concomitant group exhibited a significantly lower risk of allergic reactions (aIRR: 0.71, 95 % CI: 0.58-0.87), neuritis (aIRR: 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.57-0.91), and pneumonia (aIRR: 0.85, 95 % CI: 0.80-0.90), while demonstrating significantly higher risks of paralysis (aIRR: 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.05-2.52) compared to the sequential group.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of PPSV-23 and influenza vaccine in the elderly was not associated with a higher risk of most prespecified adverse events (AEs) compared to sequential vaccination. This study supports the safety of concomitant administration of PPSV-23 and influenza vaccine.

Cardiovascular, Neurological, and Immunological Adverse Events and the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine

Importance

Despite widespread immunization with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), safety concerns remain owing to a lack of statistical power and largely outdated evidence.

Objective

To evaluate the association between cardiovascular, neurological, and immunological adverse events and PPSV23 vaccination in older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study using a self-controlled risk interval design used a large linked database created by linking the Korea Immunization Registry Information System and the National Health Information Database (2018 to 2021). Participants included patients aged 65 years or older with a history of PPSV23 vaccination and incident cardiovascular, neurological, or immunological events during the risk and control intervals. Data were analyzed from November 2022 to April 2023.

Exposure

23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The occurrence of 1 among 6 cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, hypotension, and myocarditis or pericarditis), 2 neurological events (Bell palsy and Guillain-Barré syndrome), and 3 immunological events (sepsis, thrombocytopenia, and anaphylaxis) during the risk and control periods. The risk and control intervals were defined as 1 to 28 and 57 to 112 days after PPSV23 vaccination, respectively. Conditional Poisson regression was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with a 95% CI.

Results

Altogether, 4355 of the 1 802 739 individuals who received PPSV23 vaccination and experienced at least 1 outcome event were included (mean [SD] age, 72.4 [8.2] years; 2272 male participants [52.1%]). For cardiovascular events, there were no significant associations for myocardial infarction (IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15), heart failure (IRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70-1.04), and stroke (IRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02). Similarly, no increased risks were observed for neurological and immunological outcomes: Bell palsy (IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.72-1.26), Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.06-1.17), sepsis (IRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.74-1.32), and thrombocytopenia (IRR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.60-2.35).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this self-controlled risk interval study, there was no appreciable increase in risk for most cardiovascular, neurological, or immunological adverse events following PPSV23. The updated safety profile of PPSV23 provides supportive evidence for the establishment of immunization strategies for older adults.

Pneumococcal Vaccine for Adults Aged ≥19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2023

This report compiles and summarizes all published recommendations from CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of pneumococcal vaccines in adults aged ≥19 years in the United States. This report also includes updated and new clinical guidance for implementation from CDC

Before 2021, ACIP recommended 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) alone (up to 2 doses), or both a single dose of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) in combination with 1–3 doses of PPSV23 in series (PCV13 followed by PPSV23), for use in U.S. adults depending on age and underlying risk for pneumococcal disease. In 2021, two new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs), a 15-valent and a 20-valent PCV (PCV15 and PCV20), were licensed for use in U.S. adults aged ≥18 years by the Food and Drug Administration

ACIP recommendations specify the use of either PCV20 alone or PCV15 in series with PPSV23 for all adults aged ≥65 years and for adults aged 19–64 years with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors who have not received a PCV or whose vaccination history is unknown. In addition, ACIP recommends use of either a single dose of PCV20 or ≥1 dose of PPSV23 for adults who have started their pneumococcal vaccine series with PCV13 but have not received all recommended PPSV23 doses. Shared clinical decision-making is recommended regarding use of a supplemental PCV20 dose for adults aged ≥65 years who have completed their recommended vaccine series with both PCV13 and PPSV23

Updated and new clinical guidance for implementation from CDC includes the recommendation for use of PCV15 or PCV20 for adults who have received PPSV23 but have not received any PCV dose. The report also includes clinical guidance for adults who have received 7-valent PCV (PCV7) only and adults who are hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

A case of vaccine-associated myocarditis following pneumococcal immunization leading to acute mitral regurgitation

Vaccine‐associated myocarditis (VAM) is a rare entity but can result in potentially serious sequelae if left untreated. However, the mechanisms of the complications of VAM and its treatment remain unclear. Herein, we report the first case of VAM related to pneumococcal immunization, presenting as a local and systemic inflammatory reaction, in which the patient developed significant secondary mitral regurgitation, resulting in acute heart failure. Finally, the patient recovered completely following corticosteroid treatment. This case highlights the value of cardiac magnetic resonance and the pitfall of endomyocardial biopsy in establishing the definitive diagnosis of VAM and emphasizes the importance of optimal management in understanding the mechanism and instituting the treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation caused by VAM.

Immune thrombocytopenia purpura flare post COVID-19 vaccine

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a recently discovered disease that has yet to be thoroughly described. It is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel virus that can be transmitted easily from human to human, mainly by the respiratory route. The disease often presents with non-specific symptoms such as fever, headache, and fatigue, accompanied by respiratory symptoms (e.g., cough and dyspnea) and other systemic involvement. Currently, vaccination is the primary strategy to prevent transmission and reduce disease severity. However, vaccines have side effects, and the consequences of vaccination in different diseases are not well established. Moreover, the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy is another not well-known area.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a young lady known to have ITP, which was controlled for years, presented with relapse after taking the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during pregnancy.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The patient had a relapse of ITP after the introduction of the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, which worsened further after the second dose. This suggests that patients with ITP who develop flare post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine should have their second dose delayed, particularly if pregnant.

CONCLUSION

To avoid further deterioration in platelet count, and avoid confusion due to the presence of different causes of thrombocytopenia and avoid complications related to thrombocytopenia during pregnancy which can affect the mode of delivery.

THE CASE IS REPORTED IN LINE WITH THE SCARE 2020 CRITERIA

Agha RA, Franchi T, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, for the SCARE Group. The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines, International Journal of Surgery 2020; 84:226-230.

Cost-effectiveness analysis for PCV13 in adults 60 years and over with underlying medical conditions which put them at an elevated risk of pneumococcal disease in Japan

Background: The objective of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of PCV13 vs. PPV23 and no vaccination and PPV23 vs. no vaccination in adults aged ≥ 60 years with underlying medical conditions which put them at an elevated risk of pneumococcal disease in a Japanese healthcare setting.Research design and methods: A natural history model was developed with a life-long time horizon and 1-year cycle length, with microsimulation as a modeling technique. The expected costs from a public payer's and societal perspective, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and prevented cases and deaths caused by IPD (invasive pneumococcal disease) and NBP (non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia) were estimated.Results: In the base-case scenario, the cost per QALY gained from a public payer's perspective for PCV13 vs, PPV23 and no vaccination were 500,255JPY and 1,139,438JPY, respectively, The cost per QALY gained for PPV23 vs no vaccination was 1,687,057JPY. Over the life-long time horizon for 1 million patients, when compared to PPV23, PCV13 resulted in 65 fewer IPD cases, 2,894 fewer NBP cases, and 384 fewer deaths caused by pneumococcal disease.Conclusions: In adults aged 60 years and over with underlying medical conditions, PCV13 was shown to be a more cost-effective alternative to PPV23.

[Alterations in responses to vaccines in older people]

The aging population raises a number of public health issues including a need to address the severity and frequency of infections observed in older people. Vaccines play an important role in prevention. However, immunosenescence alters the intensity and quality of vaccine responses, thus limiting the impact of recommendations directed after 65 years for vaccination against flu, pneumococci, pertussis, tetanus and zoster. Immunosenescence, aggravated by co-morbidities, varies with age, becoming apparent after 60-65 years and more profound after 85 years. All stages of vaccine responses are affected by immunosenescence, from the innate immunity required to activate these responses to the induction of protective antibody responses and immune memory. Nevertheless, the capacity to develop new responses to primary vaccination is more affected than the ability to respond to recalls, although this is also impaired. Responses to vaccines are differentially altered depending on vaccine and age. Influenza vaccines are modestly immunogenic and several meta-analyses agree an estimate for efficacy of about 50% against virologically-proven flu and 40% against flu-related deaths. The anti-pneumococcal 23-valent non-conjugated vaccine does not induce memory while the 13-valent conjugated one does, but their efficacy are likely to be similar between 70 to 52% before 75 years. A sequential vaccination program with the 13-valent primo-vaccination followed by the 23-valent, recommended in immune-suppressed patients, is currently being studied in France. The waning of immunity to pertussis makes recalls necessary in the elderly who develop good antibody responses. Several research avenues are currently being pursued to try improve the degree of protection conferred by these vaccines in elderly.