An adenomatous polyp case-control study to assess occupational risk factors following a workplace colorectal cancer cluster

Unexplained cancer clusters: common threads

A number of identified cancer clusters have followed exposures to mixtures of chemicals. The causes for these cancers could not be attributed to any of the individual chemicals in the mixtures and up to now have remained unexplained. The author presents case studies showing that these previously unexplained cancer clusters have common characteristics. First, they can be attributed to exposures to mixtures that contain at least one lipophilic and one hydrophilic chemical, with octanol:water partition coefficients, K(ow), indicative of lipophilic or hydrophilic character. Second, the specific combinations of lipophiles and hydrophiles act as individual entities and produce cancers not associated with exposure to any of the individual chemicals contained in the mixtures. The cancers that follow these exposures can be in the form of single or multiple cancers per cluster.

Cancer and benign tumor incidence among employees in a polymers research complex

The detection of several intracranial tumors among employees in one building complex (C500) at a petrochemical research facility prompted investigation of a possible workplace cause. This retrospective follow-up study included 1847 subjects, of whom 1735 had worked in C500. Medical records, death certificates, and Illinois State Cancer Registry data confirmed self-reported cancers and tumors. Analyses compared the subjects' cancer and benign intracranial tumor incidence rates with national general population rates. C500 employees had 15% fewer than expected total cancers (92 observed/108 expected; standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 69 to 104). An excess of brain cancer (6/2.0; SIR, 302; 95% CI, 111 to 657) was concentrated among white men who had 10 or more years since hire and 5 or more years of C500 employment (4/0.7; SIR, 602; 95% CI, 165 to 1552) and who had worked in a particular building of C500 (5/0.7; SIR, 735; 95% CI, 239 to 1716). An excess of benign intracranial tumors (6/1.6; SIR, 385; 95% CI, 142 to 839) was not restricted to a single type of tumor and was not concentrated in any particular building. Occupational exposure may have caused the increased rate of brain cancer but is a less likely explanation for the elevated rate of benign intracranial tumors.

A case-control study of the relationship between the risk of colon cancer in men and exposures to occupational agents

BACKGROUND

We conducted a population-based case-control study in Montreal, Canada, to explore associations between hundreds of occupational circumstances and several cancer sites, including colon.

METHODS

We interviewed 497 male patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of colon cancer, 1514 controls with cancers at other sites, and 533 population-based controls. Detailed job histories and relevant potential confounding variables were obtained, and the job histories were translated by a team of chemists and industrial hygienists into a history of occupational exposures.

RESULTS

We found that there was reasonable evidence of associations for men employed in nine industry groups (adjusted odds ranging from 1.1 to 1.6 per a 10-year increase in duration of employment), and in 12 job groups (OR varying from 1.1 to 1.7). In addition, we found evidence of increased risks by increasing level of exposures to 21 occupational agents, including polystyrene (OR for "substantial" exposure (OR(subst)) = 10.7), polyurethanes (OR(subst) = 8.4), coke dust (OR(subst) = 5.6), mineral oils (OR(subst) = 3.3), polyacrylates (OR(subst) = 2.8), cellulose nitrate (OR(subst) = 2.6), alkyds (OR(subst) = 2.5), inorganic insulation dust (OR(subst) = 2.3), plastic dusts (OR(subst) = 2.3), asbestos (OR(subst) = 2.1), mineral wool fibers (OR(subst) = 2.1), glass fibers (OR(subst) = 2.0), iron oxides (OR(subst) = 1.9), aliphatic ketones (OR(subst) = 1.9), benzene (OR(subst) = 1.9), xylene (OR(subst) = 1.9), inorganic acid solutions (OR(subst) = 1.8), waxes, polishes (OR(subst) = 1.8), mononuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (OR(subst) = 1.6), toluene (OR(subst) = 1.6), and diesel engine emissions (OR(subst) = 1.5). Not all of these effects are independent because some exposures occurred contemporaneously with others or because they referred to a group of substances.

CONCLUSIONS

We have uncovered a number of occupational associations with colon cancer. For most of these agents, there are no published data to support or refute our observations. As there are few accepted risk factors for colon cancer, we suggest that new occupational and toxicologic studies be undertaken focusing on the more prevalent substances reported herein.

Cancer incidence among employees at a petrochemical research facility

This investigation evaluated cancer incidence among workers at a petrochemical research facility in Illinois. A cluster of brain cancer and other intracranial tumors had occurred at the facility before the study began. The subjects were 5641 people who had worked at the facility from 1970 through 1996 and who had lived in Illinois at any time between 1986 and 1997. Data on cancer cases came primarily from the Illinois State Cancer Registry. Analyses compared the 1986-to-1997 cancer incidence rates of employees with Illinois general population rates. Subjects had 18% fewer than expected total cancers (125 observed/153 expected cases; standardized incidence ratio [SIR], 82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 68 to 98), which was primarily attributed to a large deficit of lung cancer (10/26; SIR, 39; CI, 19 to 72). Brain cancer was increased in the overall study group (6/2.7; SIR, 222; CI, 81 to 484). This excess was restricted to white men who were scientists or technicians for one of the three companies at the facility (6/0.8; SIR, 750; CI, 275 to 1633); all cases in this group had worked in the "500 building complex" (6/0.6; SIR, 968; CI, 355 to 2106). Subjects also had an increased incidence of thyroid cancer (7/2.6; SIR, 265; CI, 106 to 546) that was not concentrated in particular occupational or building groups. The brain cancer incidence patterns indicated that an unidentified occupational exposure might have been responsible for the excess. Chance, socioeconomic factors leading to better case detection in facility employees than in the general population, and confounding by potential nonoccupational risk factors are plausible explanations of the observed increase in thyroid cancer.

Mortality among employees at a petrochemical research facility

BACKGROUND

This retrospective follow-up study evaluated mortality during 1970-1996 among 6,956 employees at a petrochemical research facility in Illinois.

METHODS

Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared employees' mortality rates with those of the Illinois general population. Poisson regression procedures estimated rate ratios for various subject subgroups compared to other facility employees.

RESULTS

Subjects had 267 observed/524 expected deaths (SMR = 51) from all causes combined and a large deficit of deaths from all cancers (76/136, SMR = 56) and from most other major diseases. Other results included fewer than expected brain cancers (1/4.0, SMR = 25) and a slight increase in colorectal cancer (20/14, SMR = 139) that was concentrated in white male scientists employed for one of the three main companies at the facility (SMR = 295, RR = 2.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The deficit of brain cancer deaths contrasts with an excess incidence seen in a companion study. Subjects' generally favorable mortality experience probably reflects socioeconomic advantages of employees relative to the Illinois general population.

Absence of risk of colorectal cancer among workers at a UK polypropylene production plant

Images

Retrospective cohort study of workers of a synthetic textiles plant in Quebec: II. Colorectal cancer mortality and incidence

This paper describes standard mortality and nested case-control analyses of colorectal cancer for a cohort of synthetic textiles workers in which a cluster of five cases was observed previously. The cohort consisted of 7,487 men and 2,724 women who had more than 1 year's experience at the plant and who were either working in 1947 or were newly employed between 1947 and 1977. The Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) for colorectal cancer for men was 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.92; 50 deaths) and for women it was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.57-1.69; 15 deaths). Among men only there was a suggestion that risks increased according to the length of service at the plant. In the nested case-control study, incident cases as well as deceased cases were included. A variety of analyses were carried out according to duration of employment in the processing units. For men the risk of colon cancer increased with duration of employment in the polypropylene and cellulose triacetate extrusion unit (unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for > or = 5 years duration = 5.52; 95% CI: 1.12-27.26; 4 exposed cases). It was not possible, however, to provide an independent confirmation of this putative association because the case series included three of the original five cases. There was some evidence of increased risks in the cellulose acetate fiber manufacturing unit and in the dyeing and finishing unit, but the data were compatible with the null hypothesis of no effect. No associations were observed for employment in any of the other processing units.

A Survey of Industries and Colorectal Cancer Screening of Employees in the East Midlands of England

The number of industries in the East Midlands of England who were prepared to enrol their employees in a scheme to detect colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood testing was investigated. Company directors were asked if they would supply a list of their employees over the age of 40 years and allow a research team to give a 15 min talk at the workplace. Forty-nine per cent of firms responded to the questionnaire and 27% of businesses were prepared to enrol. There was no difference in mean total employees between firms willing and unwilling to participate (unpaired t-test, P>0.05). The commonest reason given by managers rejecting the scheme was that they did not believe the workforce would be interested.

Disease clusters in occupational medicine: a protocol for their investigation in the workplace

Disease clusters have been an important source of epidemiologic and medical information in the history of occupational medicine. Many accepted disease-exposure linkages were first observed and investigated as disease clusters in the workplace setting. Recent interest in disease cluster methodology has focused on traditional environmental settings. There has been very little work on a similar methodology for the investigation of disease clusters in the workplace, despite the many advantages of workplace cluster investigations for recognizing new etiologic associations. In this paper, a protocol is proposed and discussed which can be implemented in both acute and chronic disease cluster outbreaks in the workplace, where no obvious previously recognized cause is identified. A standardized approach to occupational disease cluster investigation will lead to increased efficiency, decreased social-political tensions, and a greater yield of scientific information.