Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell cancer

Specific immunotherapy in renal cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Renal cell cancer (RCC) is the tenth most common malignancy in adults. In recent years, several approaches of active and passive immunotherapy have been studied extensively in clinical trials of patients with RCC. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the clinical efficacy of various approaches of specific immunotherapy in patients with RCC.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, TRIP, DART, OpenGrey and ProQuest without any language filter through to 9 October 2015. One author reviewed search results for irrelevant and duplicate studies and two other authors independently extracted data from the studies. We collated study findings and calculated a weighted treatment effect across studies using Review Manager (version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration).

RESULTS

We identified 14 controlled studies with 4013 RCC patients after excluding irrelevant and duplicate studies from 11,319 references retrieved from a literature search. Overall, five autologous tumor cell vaccines, one peptide-based vaccine, one virus-based vaccine and one dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine were studied in nine controlled studies of active specific immunotherapies. A total of three passive immunotherapies including autologous cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, auto lymphocyte therapy (ALT) and autologous lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells were studied in four controlled studies. The clinical efficacy of tumor lysate-pulsed DCs, with CIK cells was studied in one controlled trial concurrently. The overall quality of studies was fair. Meta-analysis of seven studies showed that patients undergoing specific immunotherapy had significantly higher overall survival (OS) than those in the control group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-0.89, p = 0.003]. In addition, a meta-analysis of four studies showed that there was a significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between patients undergoing specific immunotherapy and patients in control groups (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.73-1, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this systematic review suggest that some specific immunotherapies such as Reniale, ACHN-IL-2, Newcastle disease virus (NDV) virus-infected autologous tumor cells, ALT and CIK treatment could be beneficiary for the treatment of patients with RCC.

WITHDRAWN: Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

This review is being updated and replaced following the publication of a new protocol (Unverzagt S, Moldenhauer I, Coppin C, Greco F, Seliger B. Immunotherapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma [Protocol]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD011673. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011673). It will remain withdrawn when the new review is published.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

A new method to estimate parameters of the growth model for metastatic tumours

Purpose

Knowledge of natural tumour growth is valuable for understanding tumour biology, optimising screening programs, prognostication, optimal scheduling of chemotherapy, and assessing tumour spread. However, mathematical modelling in individuals is hampered by the limited data available. We aimed to develop a method to estimate parameters of the growth model and formation rate of metastases in individual patients.

Materials and methods

Data from one patient with liver metastases from a primary ileum carcinoid and one patient with lung metastases from a primary renal cell carcinoma were used to demonstrate this new method. Metastatic growth models were estimated by direct curve fitting, as well as with the new proposed method based on the relationship between tumour growth rate and tumour volume. The new model was derived from the Gompertzian growth model by eliminating the time factor (age of metastases), which made it possible to perform the calculations using data from all metastases in each patient. Finally, the formation time of each metastasis and, consecutively, the formation rate of metastases in each patient were estimated.

Results

With limited measurements in clinical studies, fitting different growth curves was insufficient to estimate true tumour growth, even if patients were followed for several years. Growth of liver metastases was well described with a general growth model for all metastases. However, the lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma were better described by heterogeneous exponential growth with various growth rates.

Conclusion

Analysis of the regression of tumour growth rate with the logarithm of tumour volume can be used to estimate parameters of the tumour growth model and metastasis formation rates, and therefore the number and size distribution of metastases in individuals.

Targeted Approaches for Treating Advanced Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

The mainstay of any curative treatment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. In the case of metastatic disease at presentation, a radical nephrectomy is recommended to good performance status patients prior to the start of cytokine treatment. Interferon (IFN)-a offers in a small but significant percentage of patients advantage in overall survival. Interleukin (IL)-2-based therapy gives similar survival rates. To date, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy do not have a proven impact on survival. Recent insights demonstrate that the majority of clear cell RCC harbor abnormalities of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene. This gene plays a key role in the stimulation of angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in this highly vascularized tumor. This opens interesting new treatment strategies including blockade of VEGF with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab (Avastin) and inhibition of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases with small oral molecules such as sunitinib (SU11248, Sutent) or PTK787. Likewise, inhibition of the Raf kinase pathway with oral sorafenib (Bay 43-9006, Nexavar) or inhibition of the mTOR pathway with intravenous CCI-779 are under investigation. Preliminary clinical results with all these compounds are promising, and the results of ongoing first-line phase III studies will become available in the next years.

Autologous renal cell cancer vaccines using heat shock protein-peptide complexes

Investigations into the role of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in immune response have progressed well into a third decade, and indications of their use for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the adjuvant setting will be revealed in the near future when a randomized phase III clinical trial is completed. Additional ongoing and planned randomized clinical trials will test the efficacy of HSP-based vaccines in more advanced stages of RCC. This review describes the compelling scientific rationale behind testing HSPs in RCC against the backdrop of other immunotherapeutic approaches in this indication.

Novel treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The mainstay of any curative treatment in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. In case of metastatic disease at presentation a radical nephrectomy is recommended to good performance status patients prior to start of interferon-alfa treatment. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) offers in a small but significant percentage of patients advantage in overall survival; interleukin-2 (IL-2) based therapy gives similar survival rates. To date hormonal and chemotherapy do not have a proven impact on survival. The recent new insights in the molecular biology of clear RCC has revealed a key-role for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the stimulation of angiogenesis in this highly vascularized tumour. This opens interesting new treatment strategies including: blockage of VEGF with the monoclonal antibody bevacizumab and inhibition of VEGF receptor tyrosine kinases (with small oral molecules such as SU11248 or PTK787). Likewise, inhibition of the Raf kinase pathway (with oral Bay 43-9006) or inhibition of the mTOR pathway (with i.v. CCI-779) are under investigation. Preliminary clinical results with all these compounds are interesting and the results of ongoing phase III studies will become available in the next years.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alfa to other options. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival at one year, with remission as the main secondary outcome of interest.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A systematic search of the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases was conducted for the period 1966 through end of December 2003. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the periodic meetings of the American Urologic Association, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ECCO - the European Cancer Conference, and the European Society of Medical Oncology for the period 1995 to June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported remission or survival by allocation. Fifty-three identified studies involving 6117 patients were eligible and all but one reported remission; 32 of these studies reported the one-year survival outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment remission (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alfa versus controls, and for two randomized studies of the value of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa in fit patients with metastases detected at the time of diagnosis.

MAIN RESULTS

Combined data for a variety of immunotherapies gave an overall chance of partial or complete remission of only 12.9% (99 study arms), compared to 2.5% in 10 non-immunotherapy control arms, and 4.3% in two placebo arms. Twenty-eight percent of these remissions were designated as complete (data from 45 studies). Median survival averaged 13.3 months (range by arm, 6 to 27+ months). The difference in remission rate between arms was poorly correlated with the difference in median survival so that remission rate is not a good surrogate or intermediate outcome for survival for advanced renal cancer. We were unable to identify any published randomized study of high-dose interleukin-2 versus a non-immunotherapy control, or of high-dose interleukin-2 versus interferon-alfa reporting survival. It has been established that reduced dose interleukin-2 given by intravenous bolus or by subcutaneous injection provides equivalent survival to high dose interleukin-2 with less toxicity. Results from four studies (644 patients) indicate that interferon-alfa is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.77). Using the method of Parmar 1998, the pooled overall hazard ratio for death was 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.88). The weighted average median improvement in survival was 3.8 months. T he optimal dose and duration of interferon-alfa remains to be elucidated. The addition of a variety of enhancers, including lower dose intravenous or subcutaneous interleukin-2, has failed to improve survival compared to interferon-alfa alone. Two recent randomized studies have examined the role of initial nephrectomy prior to interferon-alfa therapy in highly selected fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms: despite minimal improvement in the chance of remission, both studies of up-front nephrectomy improved median survival by 4.8 months over interferon-alfa alone. Recent studies have been examining anti-angiogenesis agents. A landmark study of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, was associated with significant prolongation of the time to progression of disease when given at high dose compared to low-dose or placebo therapy though frequency of remissions or survival were not improved.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

interferon-alfa provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. In fit patients with metastases at diagnosis and minimal symptoms, nephrectomy followed by interferon-alfa gives the best survival strategy for fully validated therapies. The need for more effective specific therapy for this condition is apparent.

Intratumoral administration of a 1,2-dimyristyloxypropyl-3- dimethylhydroxyethyl ammonium bromide/dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine formulation of the human interleukin-2 gene in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Leuvectin (Vical Inc., San Diego, CA) is a gene transfer product in which a plasmid encoding the human interleukin-2 (IL-2) gene is complexed with the cationic lipid 1,2-dimyristyloxypropyl-3-dimethylhydroxyethyl ammonium bromide/dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DMRIE/DOPE). In the current study, the authors investigated the safety and efficacy of in situ vaccination with Leuvectin in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated with intratumorally administered Leuvectin at doses ranging from 0.75 to 4 mg. These patients subsequently were evaluated for response and for treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated: no Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in association with the study agent. Documented side effects included Grade 1 pain at the injection site (20%); mild (i.e., Grade 1 or 2) constitutional symptoms, including malaise/myalgia, low-grade fever, and chills (74%); Grade 1 fatigue (19%); Grade 1 or 2 nausea (10%); and Grade 2 allergy (1 occurrence). Two patients experienced partial responses, which endured for 32 months and 6 years, respectively, and 1 patient currently is experiencing a pathologic complete response, which, to date, has persisted for 50 months; thus, the overall response rate was 10%. In addition, 7 patients (23%) experienced disease stabilization for a median of 8 months (range, 4-48 months). The median duration of survival from the start of Leuvectin treatment was 11 months (range, 2-72 months), with a 1-year survival rate of 48% and a 3-year survival rate of 19%. Laboratory analysis of tumor samples revealed the presence of IL-2 plasmid DNA in six of eight patients posttreatment, increased IL-2 expression in tumor cells in four of eight patients posttreatment, and increased tumor infiltration by CD8-positive lymphocytes in five of eight patients posttreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy with intratumorally administered Leuvectin is safe and can lead to durable objective responses in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Prognostic and predictive factors of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis. The value of immunotherapy with IFN-alpha and IL-2 both as single agent or as the combination is extensively investigated. The optimal dose and schedule is not known. In various studies response rates vary between 10 and 40%. The duration of response is variable. For a partial response a median duration between 10 and 12 months is given. Complete responses are sometimes long-lasting (a couple of years). The toxicity is drug, dose and schedule dependent. On the basis of a number of prognostic factors, such as performance score, time between the initial diagnosis and the treatment of metastases and the number of metastatic sites, patients can be divided in different prognostic groups. Patients who are classified in the good or intermediate prognostic group may have an improvement of their survival after immunotherapy and therefore they are candidates for immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy for advanced renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND

The course of advanced renal cell carcinoma is extremely variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to disease progression refractory to chemotherapy. Immunotherapy has held promise of improved outcomes based on uncontrolled studies and randomized controlled trials generally limited by small size and low power.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate immunotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma by comparing: (1) high dose interleukin-2 to other options and (2) interferon-alpha to other options.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of MEDLINE, Cancerlit, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from 1966 through the end of 1999. Handsearches were made of the proceedings of the annual meetings of the American Urologic Association, ASCO, and biennial European ECCO meetings, and the references of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that selected (or stratified) patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, utilized an immunotherapeutic agent in at least one study arm, and reported response or survival by allocation. Forty-two studies involving 4216 patients were eligible and reported response and 26 of these reported survival outcome (3089 patients).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers abstracted each article by following a prospectively designed protocol. Dichotomous outcomes for treatment response (partial plus complete) and for deaths at one year were used for the main comparisons. Survival hazard ratios were also used for studies of interferon-alpha versus controls.

MAIN RESULTS

The average response rate was 10.2 % (range by arm, 0 - 39%) and complete response rate was 3.2% (123/3852; n = 38 studies). Median survival averaged 11.6 months (range by arm, 6 - 28 months) and two-year survival averaged 22% (16 studies, range by arm 8 - 41%). There were no placebo-controlled studies and no randomized controlled studies examined survival for high dose interleukin-2 versus controls. Results from 6 studies (n = 963) indicate that interferon-alpha is superior to controls (OR for death at one year = 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.89. The pooled hazard ratio for survival of 0.78 (0.67 - 0.90) indicates that the treatment effect persisted until 24 months from randomization. The weighted average median improvement in survival was 2.6 months. Additional comparisons failed to prove a survival benefit from the addition of other agents to either modified schedules of interleukin-2 or to interferon-alpha. Dose-response studies examining survival for either agent could not be identified. The difference in response rate between arms was correlated with the difference in survival (P<0.001) suggesting that response rate difference may be a surrogate intermediate endpoint for survival.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha provides a modest survival benefit compared to other commonly used treatments and should be considered for the control arm of future studies of systemic agents. Interleukin-2 has not been validated in controlled randomized studies.

Kidney cancer

In the USA, the incidence of kidney cancer has increased 43% since 1973. The risk of the disorder is higher in men than in women and increases with age. The von Hippel-Lindau tumour-suppressor gene is inactivated in over 75% of sporadic cases. Metastatic disease is present in 20-30% of patients at diagnosis. Early-stage kidney cancer is treated with a radical nephrectomy, but under certain circumstances a partial nephrectomy may be done. Tumour thrombus into the vena cava or right atrium requires thoracotomy and hypothermic circulatory arrest for successful removal of the tumour, but should not be done if extensive nodal or frank metastatic disease is present. Interleukin-2 is the systemic therapy of choice for metastatic disease at present, with long-term relapse-free survival of 5-8%. Several treatments including anti-angiogenesis drugs, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, and differentiating agents are being actively investigated. Fluorouracil has a 10-15% response rate, and surgical excision of isolated metastases should always be considered. Therapy for metastatic renal cancer remains inadequate, but recent developments in basic and clinical research suggest future improvement.

A randomized phase II trial of interleukin 2 and interleukin 2-interferon alpha in advanced renal cancer

A randomized phase II trial was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of interleukin 2 (IL-2) with an IL-2 and interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) regimen for the treatment of metastatic renal carcinoma. Sixty patients with recurrent renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who had previously undergone a nephrectomy were randomized to receive three cycles of IL-2 or IL-2 with IFN-alpha2b. Eighteen MU of IL-2 were administered subcutaneously on Mondays-Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Those patients randomized to receive the combination received the same regimen of IL-2 with 9 MU of IFN-alpha2b subcutaneously on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays for 3 weeks out of 4. Thirty patients were randomized to receive each arm. Twenty-nine were evaluable in each arm. Twenty-two patients received three cycles of IL-2 but only 14 patients received three cycles of IL-2/IFN-alpha because of the greater toxicity of the combination. The principal toxicities included nausea, fatigue and fever. There were no complete responses in either arm and only two patients who were treated with IL-2 attained a partial response. Twelve patients in each arm had stable disease and 15 patients in the IL-2 arm and 16 patients in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm progressed through treatment. There were no significant differences in survival. Ten patients who received IL-2 are alive with a median follow-up of 266 days, whereas six patients who received IL-2/IFN-alpha are alive after a median of 278 days. The median survival from the time of identification of metastatic disease is 444 days in the IL-2 arm and 381 days in the IL-2/IFN-alpha arm. The IL-2/IFN-alpha combination is more toxic than IL-2 alone and this resulted in a reduced number of cycles of treatment. However, the median survival of the two groups was the same, suggesting that further evaluation of the IL-2/IFN-alpha combination should be confined to large prospective randomized clinical trials.