Evaluation of oil-soluble FUdR ester for transcatheter arterial treatment of hepatomas

Cryotherapy for liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The liver is affected by two of the most common groups of malignant tumours: primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer and long-term survival rates reported for patients after radical surgical treatment is approximately 50%. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in the majority of patients. Cryotherapy is performed with the use of an image-guided cryoprobe which delivers liquid nitrogen or argon gas to the tumour tissue. The subsequent process of freezing is associated with formation of ice crystals, which directly damage exposed tissue, including cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, and six other databases up to June 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators for liver metastases, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We extracted information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes important for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each study. One review author performed data extraction and a second review author checked entries.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised clinical trials comparing cryotherapy versus no intervention or versus systemic treatments; however, we identified one randomised clinical trial comparing cryotherapy with conventional surgery. The trial was conducted in Ukraine. The trial included 123 participants with solitary, or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases; 63 participants received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 women and 87 men. The primary sites for the metastases were colon and rectum (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), skin (4.9%), ovaries (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestines (1.6%), pancreas (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The trial was not reported sufficiently enough to assess the risk of bias of the randomisation process, allocation concealment, or presence of blinding. It was also not possible to assess incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting bias. The certainty of evidence was low because of risk of bias and imprecision.The participants were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). The trial reported that the mortality at 10 years was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group. The calculated by us relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02. We judged the evidence as low-certainty evidence. Regarding adverse events and complications, separately and in total, our calculation showed no evidence of a difference in recurrence of the malignancy in the liver: 86% (54/63) of the participants in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the participants in the conventional surgery group developed a new malignancy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). The frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group, except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the conventional surgery group. However, the authors did not report whether there was any evidence of a difference. There were no intervention-related mortality or bile leakages.We identified no evidence for health-related quality of life, cancer mortality, or time to progression of liver metastases. The study reported tumour response in terms of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in 69% of participants, and reported results in the form of a graph for 30% of participants. The carcinoembryonic antigen level was lower in the cryotherapy group, and decreased to normal values faster in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05).

FUNDING

the trial did not provide information on funding.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy versus conventional surgery in people with liver metastases is of low certainty. We are uncertain about our estimate and cannot determine whether cryotherapy compared with conventional surgery is beneficial or harmful. We found no evidence for the benefits or harms of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, or versus systemic treatments.

Epirubicin-Lipiodol chemotherapy versus 131iodine-Lipiodol radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Arterially administered iodized oil (Lipiodol) is selectively retained by hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and has been used as a vehicle for delivery of therapeutic agents to these tumors. This study compared the efficacy of Lipiodol-targeted epirubicin chemotherapy with Lipiodol-131I radiotherapy.

METHODS

Ninety-five patients with unresectable HCC confined to the liver were administered either Lipiodol-epirubicin emulsion (n = 69; 61 cirrhotics; Okuda tumor Stage I, 14; II, 37; III, 18; epirubicin dose, 75 mg/m2) or Lipiodol-131I (131I) (n = 26; 18 cirrhotics; Okuda tumor Stage I, 6; II, 19; III, 1; dose 750-1050 MBq). The last 28 patients (17 epirubicin, 11 131I) were treated within a prospective randomized trial. Bolus drug or isotope was injected into the hepatic artery by transfemoral cannulation. Lipiodol and 131I uptake were gauged by 10th day computed tomography and 48-hour scintiscan. Treatments were repeated two-monthly when indicated.

RESULTS

Tumor size at 2 months remained static or diminished partially in 21 of 38 epirubicin recipients (55%) and 15/22 131I recipients (68%). Actuarial survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 40%, 25%, and 6% with epirubicin, and 58%, 25%, and 0% with 131I; 30-day mortality was 11% and 15%, respectively. Comparison with historic controls indicated survival benefit in Stages I and II. Similar findings were recorded in the 28 patients in the randomized trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unresectable HCC receiving Lipiodol-epirubicin or Lipiodol-131I show good tumor localization, acceptable toxicity, and comparable survival benefit at 6 and 12 months with either modality.

Postoperative prophylactic lipiodolization reduces the intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To determine a feasible postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, orally-administered chemotherapy (OC) and prophylactic lipiodolization (selective regional cancer chemotherapy using lipid contrast medium plus an anticancer drug) (PL) were compared prospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients who had undergone hepatic resection from 1989 to 1992 were divided into three groups: the control group (n = 19), given no chemotherapy; the OC group (n = 12), given 300 to 400 mg/d of 5-FU derivatives (either 1-hexylcarbamoyl-5-fluorouracil or uracil and tegafur, mean total dosage: 188 g, mean administrative duration: 18 months); and the PL group (n = 17), who underwent prophylactic lipiodolization 1.8 times on average using a 44-mg mean dose of epirubicin per treatment.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found either in the 25 variables studied as a background analysis, or among the survival curves of the 3 groups. Recurrence was found in 23 remnant livers of the 48 patients. The 3-year, disease-free survival rate was 15%, 50%, and 86% in the control, OC, and PL groups, respectively. The disease-free survival curve of the PL group was significantly higher compared to either the control (P = 0.001) or the OC group (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic lipiodolization was found to be an effective treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for reducing intrahepatic recurrence after resection.

Iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

When injected into the hepatic artery the contrast agent Lipiodol (iodized poppy seed oil) is selectively retained by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for a prolonged period of time. Liver computed tomography (CT) performed after Lipiodol angiography is more sensitive than ordinary CT at imaging HCC. Arterial administration of cytotoxic drugs and radioisotopes conjugated to Lipiodol has been shown to be reasonably safe in patients with irresectable HCC. These therapies, often combined with embolization, provide effective palliation, better tumour response and improved survival compared with other available treatments. Their use as a preoperative adjunct to surgical resection of HCC is controversial.