Guidelines for prevention of thromboembolic events in valvular heart disease. Study Group of the Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology

A Study of Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women after Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Objectives:

Chronic Rheumatic Heart Disease (CRHD)is a common condition in India. CRHD accounts for a majority of heart valve surgery, including those in the younger age group. These young women almost traditionally get married in a country like India, and the social pressure to bear children is tremendous. Anticoagulation and the postoperative state of the patient itself can be a risk factor for maternal and fetal outcomes. There is very little data available for the same in India.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, 100 cases were studied retrospectively to study the fertility patterns after valvular heart surgery including fetal outcomes. This study was conducted at Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad in which pregnancy, anticoagulation, maternal and fetal outcomes were studied.

Results:

A total of 63 patients conceived after surgery (pregnancy rate = 63%/ failure rate =37%) (p=0.001). Fetal loss occurred in 6 of the pregnancies, due to spontaneous abortion (n=3) and medical abortion (n=3). Parity, associated conditions and age did not affect the outcome. During pregnancy, 28 patients switched to UF heparin, 31 stayed on warfarin, 4 did not take any anticoagulation. Fetal loss was observed in 3 patients on Warfarin during pregnancy and 3 on UF heparin. Maternal loss was observed in 4 patients out of which 2 were on Warfarin, 1 on unfractionated UF heparin and 1 did not take any anticoagulation during pregnancy. In comparison, warfarin and UF heparin had similar fetal outcomes.

Conclusion:

The study recorded good outcomes irrespective of type of prosthesis and anticoagulation.

Analysis of Anticoagulation Therapy and Anticoagulation-Related Outcomes Among Asian Patients After Mechanical Valve Replacement

IMPORTANCE

Current international normalized ratio (INR) guidelines are based on trials involving European and US populations. To our knowledge, no adequate study involving Asian patients has been conducted to date.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between INR and anticoagulation-related outcomes in an Asian population after mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral VR (MVR).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2001 and 2018, with follow-up until December 31, 2018, among patients who underwent AVR, MVR, or combined AVR-MVR at 3 medical centers and 4 regional hospitals and contributed electronic medical records to the Chang Gung Research Database. Exclusion criteria were missing demographic characteristics, younger than 20 years, fewer than 2 INR records, and having died during the hospitalization of the index surgery.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Bleeding and thromboembolic complications were analyzed. The possibility of nonlinearity and cutoff potential for the INR were explored using a logistic regression model, which considered the INR a restricted cubic spline (RCS) variable.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 900 patients, with 525 (58.3%) men and 375 (41.7%) women and a mean (SD) age of 52.0 (12.5) years. Overall, 474 (52.7%) received AVR alone, 329 (36.6%) received MVR alone, and 97 (10.8%) received combined AVR-MVR. All patients had at least 2 INR examinations after discharge, providing 16 676 INR records for the AVR group and 18 207 for the MVR and combined AVR-MVR groups. In the AVR group, the RCS model showed that higher risks of composite thromboembolic events were associated with an INR of less than 2.0 or greater than 2.6 vs an INR of 2.0, and a higher risk of bleeding events was associated with an INR of less than 1.8 or greater than 2.4 vs an INR of 2.0. When treating the INR as a categorical variable, the risk of composite thromboembolic and composite bleeding events was significantly higher among patients with INRs less than 1.5 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.73) and with INRs of 3.0 or greater (aOR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.95-6.23) vs those with INRs between 2.0 and 2.5.In the MVR and combined AVR-MVR groups, higher risks of composite thromboembolic events were associated with an INR of less than 2.1 or greater than 2.7 vs an INR of 2.5, and a higher risk of bleeding events was associated with an INR of less than 2.1 or greater than 2.8 vs an INR of 2.5. When treating the INR as a categorical variable, the risk of a composite bleeding events was significantly higher among patients with INRs of 3.5 or greater (aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.35-3.76) vs those with INRs between 2.5 and 3.0.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among Asian patients in this study, the incidence of thromboembolic events in the MVR group with INRs in the range of 2.0 to 2.5 was not significantly higher than that among those with INRs in the range of 2.5 to 3.0; in the AVR group, the incidence for those with INRs in 1.5 to 2.0 range was not significantly higher than for those with INRs in the range of 2.0 to 2.5.

The role of echocardiography in the embolic stroke of undetermined source

: Echocardiography plays an important role both in the diagnosis and the treatment/prevention of embolic stroke of undetermined source and should be performed as soon as possible for preventing ischemic stroke recurrencies, which occur more frequently during the first week after the first ischemic event. Early identification of the cause of a transient ischemic attack or stroke is indeed a primary goal for the neurologist in the Stroke Unit and requires specific diagnostic strategies. Echocardiography, together with other diagnostic tools such as carotid and transcranial ultrasounds, provides this information promptly. In particular, echocardiography might be able to detect the main sources of the embolic stroke, such as atrial fibrillation, ventricular akinesia, aortic atheroma plaques and/or cardiac shunts. The present review discusses the importance and the practical role of echocardiography as a crucial diagnostic tool for detecting the main source of emboli in the setting of the acute stroke.

The Role of Antithrombotic Therapy in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality burden affecting approximately 1-2% of adults in developed countries, mounting to over 10% in individuals aged >70 years old. Heart failure is characterized by a prothrombotic state and increased rates of stroke and thromboembolism have been reported in heart failure patients compared with the general population. However, the impact of antithrombotic therapy on heart failure remains controversial. Administration of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is the obvious (and well-established) choice in heart failure patients with cardiovascular comorbidity that necessitates their use, such as coronary artery disease or atrial fibrillation. In contrast, antithrombotic therapy has not demonstrated any clear benefit when administered for heart failure per se, i.e. with heart failure being the sole indication. Randomized studies have reported decreased stroke rates with warfarin use in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, but at the expense of excessive bleeding. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants have shown a better safety profile in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation compared with warfarin, however, current evidence about their role in heart failure with sinus rhythm is inconclusive and further research is needed. In the present review, we discuss the role of antithrombotic therapy in heart failure (beyond coronary artery disease), aiming to summarize evidence regarding the thrombotic risk and the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents in patients with heart failure.

Anticoagulation in Pregnant Women With Prosthetic Heart Valves

Background: Pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Effective anticoagulation is therefore critical in such patients but remains problematic, since oral anticoagulation and both unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin may be associated with important fetal and maternal side effects.

Purpose: To review information related to the use of anticoagulation with both warfarin and heparin and reassess the safety and efficacy of these therapies in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

Data source and selection: A MEDLINE search from 1966 to October 2003 for English and non-English language articles that reported the use of anticoagulation in pregnancy was conducted. Articles were included if they reported use of anticoagulation in pregnancy with emphasis on those that included women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

Conclusions: Anticoagulation prophylaxis with both warfarin and heparin (unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin) may be associated with important fetal and maternal side effects. Optional regimens for the treatment of low-risk and high-risk patients are proposed to minimize potential complications.

Management of Anticoagulant Therapy for Patients with Prosthetic Heart Valves or Atrial Fibrillation

There is a wide array of recommendations for the management of anticoagulant therapy in patients with mechanical heart valves. Especially the optimal intensity of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is a ongoing matter of debate. On the basis of several studies, recommendations for daily clinical practice can be made. In this review, we discussed the studies and the different guidelines. Guidelines for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation are more stringent. VKA with a target INR between 2.0 and 3.0 is more effective in the prevention of stroke than aspirin, especially in the presence of riskfactors for thromboembolism (age above 65, previous thromboembolism, history of hypertension and diabetes, enlarged left atrial diameter and left ventricular dysfunction). In the absence of clinical or echocardiographical riskfactors for thromboembolism, patients may be safely treated with aspirin.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with heart valve prostheses

Heart valve prostheses carry a risk for thrombosis and require an antithrombotic strategy to prevent stroke, systemic embolism, and prosthetic valve thrombosis. Contemporary randomized trials to guide the clinician on the optimal anticoagulant treatment are scarce, and the validity of the historical data for current recommendations can be questioned in view of the changes in valve prostheses, the patient population, and antithrombotic therapies. This limited evidence from clinical trials translates into divergent recommendations from the different scientific societies on the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulation and on the indication for antiplatelet therapy. The availability of new antithrombotic agents and the unclear thrombotic risk of the currently used prostheses underscore the need to redefine antithrombotic treatment in patients with heart valve prostheses.

Cerebral microembolization after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: comparison of warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only

BACKGROUND

No human physiological data exists on whether aspirin only is as effective as warfarin plus aspirin in preventing cerebral microembolization in the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 56 patients who had no other indication for oral anticoagulation, who underwent bAVR and received, in an open-label fashion, either daily warfarin (for INR 2.0-3.0) plus 81 mg of aspirin (n=28) or 325 mg of aspirin only (n=28). Cerebral microembolization was quantified at 4 hours (baseline) and at 1 month postoperatively, by recording 1-hour bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) microembolic signals (MES). Platelet-function analysis (PFA) of closure times (CT) on collagen was also used as a marker of platelet-dependent activation. Follow-up to 1 year was complete. Preoperative demographics and baseline platelet function were equivalent in both groups. There was no mortality, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 1 year in either group. No significant differences were found in the proportion of patients with MES among those receiving warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only, at baseline (68% versus 82%, respectively; P=0.4) and at 1 month (46% versus 43%; P=1.0) after bAVR. The total MES and PFA were also equivalent between groups, at baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Early after bAVR, the effects of these 2 antithrombotic regimens on cerebral microembolization and platelet function are equivalent. These data bring new mechanistic support to the premise that aspirin only may safely be used early after bAVR in patients who have no other indication for oral anticoagulation.

Quadruple Valve Replacement with Mechanical Valves: An 11-Year Follow-up Study

<p><b>Background:</b> We performed the first quadruple valve replacement with mechanical valves, combined with the correction of complex congenital heart disease on November 17, 1999. We report here the 11-year follow-up study.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> A 47-year-old man with subacute rheumatic endocarditis, a ventricular septal defect, and an obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract required replacement of the aortic, mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valves; repair of the ventricular septal defect; and relief of the obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract. The surgery was done on November 17, 1999, after careful systemic preparation of the patient. Warfarin therapy with a target international normalized ratio (INR) range of 1.5 to 2.0 was used. Follow-up included monitoring the INR, recording the incidences of thromboembolic and bleeding events, electrocardiography, radiography, and echocardiography evaluations.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The patient's INR was maintained between 1.5 and 2.0. All 4 mechanical prosthetic heart valves worked well. He is in generally good health without any thromboembolic or bleeding complications.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Long-term management is challenging for patients who have experienced quadruple valve replacement with mechanical valves; however, promising results could mean that replacement of all 4 heart valves in 1 operation is feasible in patients with quadruple valve disease, and an INR of 1.5 to 2.0 could be appropriate for Chinese patients with undergoing valve replacement with mechanical valves.</p>

Antithrombotic medication for cardioembolic stroke prevention

Embolism of cardiac origin accounts for about 20% of ischemic strokes. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is the most frequent cause of cardioembolic stroke. Approximately 1% of population is affected by atrial fibrillation, and its prevalence is growing with ageing in the modern world. Strokes due to cardioembolism are in general severe and prone to early recurrence and have a higher long-term risk of recurrence and mortality. Despite its enormous preventive potential, continuous oral anticoagulation is prescribed for less than half of patients with atrial fibrillation who have risk factors for cardioembolism and no contraindications for anticoagulation. Available evidence does not support routine immediate anticoagulation of acute cardioembolic stroke. Anticoagulation therapy's associated risk of hemorrhage and monitoring requirements have encouraged the investigation of alternative therapies for individuals with atrial fibrillation. New anticoagulants being tested for prevention of stroke are low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), unfractionated heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, or direct thrombin inhibitors like dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban. The later exhibit stable pharmacokinetics obviating the need for coagulation monitoring or dose titration, and they lack clinically significant food or drug interaction. Moreover, they offer another potential that includes fixed dosing, oral administration, and rapid onset of action. There are several concerns regarding potential harm, including an increased risk for hepatotoxicity, clinically significant bleeding, and acute coronary events. Therefore, additional trials and postmarketing surveillance will be needed.

Periprocedural antithrombotic management: a review of the literature and practical approach for the hospitalist physician

Many patients who are on long-term antithrombotic therapy (e.g. warfarin and/or antiplatelet agents) must be assessed for temporary discontinuation for a procedure or surgery, making this a salient topic for the hospitalist physician. Discontinuation of antithromhotic therapy can place patients at increased risk of thromboembolic complications while continuing antithrombotic therapy can increase procedure-related bleeding risk. Bridging anticoagulation with heparin or low molecular weight heparins is often used in the periprocedural period, but a great deal of uncertainty exists about how and when to use bridging anticoagulation. Because there is very little Level 1 evidence to define optimal care, both clinical practice and expert consensus guideline opinions vary. For the hospitalist, it is of critical importance to understand the available data, controversies, and management options in order to approach patient care rationally. This review provides a step-wise literature-based discussion addressing the following four questions: (1) What is the optimal management of antiplatelet therapy in the periprocedural period? (2) Are there very low bleeding risk procedures that do not require interruption of oral anticoagulation? (3) Are there low thromboembolic risk populations who do not require periprocedural bridging? (4) How do you manage patients who must discontinue anti-coagulants but are at an increased thrombotic risk?

Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the antithrombotic effect of the VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, and the clinical applications of VKA therapy and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations suggest that the individual patient's values may lead to different choices. (For a full understanding of the grading, see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al, CHEST 2008; 133:123S-131S.) Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we recommend the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy, with doses between 5 mg and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 1B); we suggest against pharmacogenetic-based dosing until randomized data indicate that it is beneficial (Grade 2C); and in elderly and other patient subgroups who are debilitated or malnourished, we recommend a starting dose of < or = 5 mg (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with nontherapeutic INRs, with INRs above the therapeutic range, and with bleeding whether the INR is therapeutic or elevated. For the use of vitamin K to reverse a mildly elevated INR, we recommend oral rather than subcutaneous administration (Grade 1A). For patients with life-threatening bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage, we recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa to immediately reverse the INR (Grade 1C). For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we recommend a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A]. We recommend that physicians who manage oral anticoagulation therapy do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dose adjustments [Grade 1B]. In patients who are suitably selected and trained, patient self-testing or patient self-management of dosing are effective alternative treatment models that result in improved quality of anticoagulation management, with greater time in the therapeutic range and fewer adverse events. Patient self-monitoring or self-management, however, is a choice made by patients and physicians that depends on many factors. We suggest that such therapeutic management be implemented where suitable (Grade 2B).

Guideline on antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery

This document presents a professional view of evidence-based recommendations around the issues of antiplatelet and anticoagulation management in cardiac surgery. It was prepared by the Audit and Guidelines Committee of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). We review the following topics: evidence for aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin cessation prior to cardiac surgery; perioperative interventions to reduce bleeding including the use of aprotinin and tranexamic acid; the use of thromboelastography to guide blood product usage; protamine reversal of heparin; the use of factor VIIa to control severe bleeding; anticoagulation after mechanical, tissue valve replacement and mitral valve repair; the use of antiplatelets and clopidogrel after cardiac surgery to improve graft patency and reduce thromboembolic complications and thromboprophylaxis in the postoperative period. This guideline is subject to continuous informal review, and when new evidence becomes available. The formal review date will be at 5 years from publication (September 2013).

Left atrial appendage can still cause clinical events after ligation

We present a 71-year-old female patient with transient ischaemic attack. A thrombus located at the stump of previously ligated left atrial appendage was suspected as the cause of event.

MECHANICAL HEART VALVES AND PREGNANCY

Mechanical heart valves pose a particular challenge in pregnancy, as the primary agent used to prevent valve thrombosis, coumadin (warfarin), is a known teratogen. Alternatives to coumadin, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are safer for the fetus, particularly during the first trimester of pregnancy, but expose the mother to potential valve failure. This review will examine these controversies and the complex literature regarding management in pregnancy.

Early antithrombotic therapy for aortic valve bioprostheses: is there an indication for routine use?

BACKGROUND

Consensus reports over the past 10 years from the United States, Europe, United Kingdom, and Canada have not provided consistent guidelines for antithrombotic therapy of aortic valve bioprostheses for the three-month period after surgery. This study was conducted to determine if antithrombotic therapy was protective against TE with aortic bioprostheses 30 days or less after aortic valve replacement (AVR).

METHODS

From 1994 to 2000, 1,372 patients implanted with three currently marketed aortic bioprostheses, Medtronic Mosaic (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) (415 patients), Carpentier-Edwards SAV (462), and Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (495) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), with a mean age of greater than 70 years were evaluated. Patient populations were comparable, inclusive of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the overall populations and for patients greater than 70 years.

RESULTS

There were 37 thromboembolic (TE) events: major TE, 14; reversible ischemic neurologic deficit (RIND), 12; and minor TE, 11. There were 4 TE deaths. Multivariate (stepwise logistic regression) analysis revealed no predictive risk factors for overall TE. For the combination of major TE plus RIND there were two predictive risk factors with analysis of 12 risk variables: preoperative cerebrovascular accident (odds ratio [OR] 4.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 16.87, p = 0.028); and concomitant CABG (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.16 to 8.76, p = 0.025). Neither anticoagulant nor antiplatelet therapies gave significant protection.

CONCLUSIONS

There does not appear to be an indication for routine antithrombotic management. The study supports the potential use of antithrombotic therapy for comorbidities of preoperative cerebrovascular accident and concomitant CABG but not atrial fibrillation, left ventricular dysfunction, or elderly age greater than 70 years. Vascular burden and advanced age are likely contributing factors to these independent predictors. There may still be a need for, or at least consideration of, a randomized trial for AVR with bioprostheses.

The obstetrical patient with a prosthetic heart valve

Definitive recommendations on anticoagulation strategy in pregnant women who have prosthetic heart valves are lacking because of the paucity of prospectively collected data. The use of warfarin, UFH, LMWH, or any combination of these choices has potentially adverse outcomes for the mother and fetus. Although there is no treatment option that has proven to be completely satisfactory, there is agreement that failures are most often due to underdosing and the lack of intensive monitoring of anticoagulation. A careful discussion with the patient must be undertaken so that she and the clinician can come to a decision about the most appropriate protocol.

Pregnancy in women with valvular heart disease

Patients with valvular disease who desire pregnancy or are already pregnant require specialised care. Ideally, women undergo preconceptual counselling that addresses any procedures needed to decrease the risks of pregnancy, including valve replacement, if the patient has symptoms at baseline. Management during pregnancy includes replacing any contraindicated medications with safer alternatives, optimising loading conditions, careful monitoring and aggressive treatment of any exacerbating factors. Rarely, percutaneous or surgical intervention is required during pregnancy. Labour and delivery often require invasive haemodynamic monitoring and a multi-disciplinary team for optimal maternal and fetal outcomes.

10-year experience with the ATS mechanical valve in the mitral position

BACKGROUND

The ATS Medical Open Pivot mechanical heart valve was introduced in 1992. Previous reports have focused on the low rate of thromboembolic complications in the aortic position. The purpose of this retrospective study is to analyze the rate of midterm thromboembolic events and other valve-related complications when the ATS Open Pivot valve is implanted in the mitral position.

METHODS

Between June 1992 and June 2002, 177 patients (63 male and 114 female; mean age 57.5 years) underwent mitral replacement with an ATS Open Pivot mechanical heart valve. Preoperatively, 17 patients (10%) were in New York Heart Association functional class II, 117 patients (66%) in class III, and 43 patients (24%) in class IV. Seventy-four patients (42%) were in chronic atrial fibrillation. Seventy-four mitral valve replacements (42%) were associated with other cardiac procedures. Etiologies included degenerative disease (56%), rheumatic disease (38%), and endocarditis (6%). On the second postoperative day, 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid and oral acenocoumarol (Sintrom) was introduced to obtain a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. All patients were followed up by one cardiologist and underwent annual transthoracic echocardiographic examination.

RESULTS

Percent follow-up was 90.4%. Data represent 724 total patient-years. Mean follow-up was 48 +/- 34 months (range, 1 to 119). Operative morbidity was 15%. Overall hospital mortality was 2.8% (5 patients). At hospital discharge, the mean INR for all the patients was 2.38 +/- 0.68 (range, 1.32 to 6.44). Five early neurologic complications occurred: 3 transient cerebrovascular accidents and 2 strokes. Three late transient cerebrovascular ischemic accidents occurred at 3, 4, and 6 years, respectively. No other complications such as paravalvular leak, valve dysfunction, thrombosis, or valve explant occurred. Postoperative echocardiographic data revealed low mean pressure gradient as related to the valvular size.

CONCLUSIONS

The ATS Medical Open Pivot mitral valve demonstrates low rates of bleeding, thromboembolic, and other valve-related complications.

Post-operative use of heparin increases morbidity of pacemaker implantation

AIMS

The objective of this study is to characterize the incidence of peri-operative severe adverse events (AEs) related to the post-operative use of heparin in patients undergoing pacemaker surgery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively compared the outcome of 38 patients with mechanical valves (MVs) and 76 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with control cases matched for gender, age, and surgical details. Heparin was systematically used post-operatively in MV patients, but left to clinical judgment in AF patients. The relative risk for severe haemorrhagic AEs was 11 (CI 1.5-81.1, P < 0.01) in the MV group when compared with matched controls and 8 (CI 1.0-62.5, P < 0.05) in the AF group. Overall, the relative risk of heparin use in the post-operative period was 14 (CI 1.88-104, P = 0.0006) and the post-operative stay was prolonged from 7 days in this group when compared with control cases (P < 0.0001).The variables associated with haemorrhage were the delay to restart heparin after surgery and the presence of an MV.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative use of heparin increases morbidity of pacemaker implantation. A different approach to management of these patients is possible.

Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

The aim of this new statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the prevention of ischemic stroke among survivors of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Evidence-based recommendations are included for the control of risk factors, interventional approaches for atherosclerotic disease, antithrombotic treatments for cardioembolism, and the use of antiplatelet agents for noncardioembolic stroke. Further recommendations are provided for the prevention of recurrent stroke in a variety of other specific circumstances, including arterial dissections; patent foramen ovale; hyperhomocysteinemia; hypercoagulable states; sickle cell disease; cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; stroke among women, particularly with regard to pregnancy and the use of postmenopausal hormones; the use of anticoagulation after cerebral hemorrhage; and special approaches for the implementation of guidelines and their use in high-risk populations.

Recommendations for the management of patients after heart valve surgery

Approximately 50,000 valve replacement operations take place in Europe annually and almost as many valve repair procedures. Previous European guidelines on management of patients after valve surgery were last published in 1995 and were limited to recommendations about antithrombotic prophylaxis. American guidelines covering the broader topic of the investigation and treatment of patients with valve disease were published in 1998 but devoted relatively little space to post-surgical management. This document represents the consensus view of a committee drawn from three European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Groups (WG): the WG on Valvular Heart Disease, the WG on Thrombosis, and the WG on Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. In almost all areas of patient management after valve surgery, randomized trials and meta-analyses do not exist. Such randomized trials as do exist are very few in number, are narrowly focused with small numbers, have limited general applicability, and do not lend themselves to meta-analysis because of widely divergent methodologies and different patient characteristics. Recommendations are therefore almost entirely based on non-randomized studies and relevant basic science.

Drug Insight: an overview of current anticoagulation therapy after heart valve replacement

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, are the gold standard approach for the long-term anticoagulant therapy of patients with mechanical heart valves. Management decisions are, however, based predominantly on expert consensus and on data from nonrandomized, follow-up studies, which have inherent limitations in their methods. Low-intensity anticoagulation therapy provides protection against thromboembolic complications in patients with most types of modern prosthetic heart valve. The addition of low-dose aspirin is safe if international normalized ratio values below 3.5 are maintained. A combined regimen should be considered in high-risk patients and those with coexistent coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease, and in patients who have suffered a thromboembolic event despite a therapeutic international normalized ratio. Thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins is restricted to specific situations, such as when a patient is intolerant to vitamin K antagonists, when surgical procedures require discontinuation of oral anticoagulation, or when the patient is pregnant. A lack of uniformity across practice guidelines make it difficult to reach treatment decisions. Each patient's preference, expressed after counseling about the risks and benefits of each treatment strategy, and an individual assessment of the patient's risk factors, should guide treatment decisions. At present, new anticoagulant agents such as factor Xa inhibitors do not represent a treatment option for heart valve recipients.

Is early anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?

OBJECTIVES

Freedom from anticoagulation is the principal advantage of bioprosthesis; however, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines recommend early anticoagulation with heparin, followed by warfarin for 3 months after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. We examined neurologic events within 90 days of bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement at our institution.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2000, 1151 patients underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with (641) or without (510) associated coronary artery bypass. By surgeon preference, 624 had early postoperative anticoagulation (AC+) and 527 did not (AC-). In the AC- group, 410 patients (78%) received antiplatelet therapy. Groups were similar with respect to gender (female, 36% AC+ vs 40% AC-, P = .21), hypertension (64% AC+ vs 61%, P = .27), and prior stroke (7.6% AC+ vs 8.5% AC-, P = .54). The AC+ group was slightly younger than the AC- group (median, 76 years vs 78 years, P = .006).

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 4.1% with 43 (3.7%) cerebrovascular events within 90 days. Excluding 18 deficits apparent upon emergence from anesthesia, we found that postoperative cerebrovascular accident occurred in 2.4% of AC+ and 1.9% AC- patients. By multivariable analysis, the only predictor of operative mortality was hypertension ( P < .0001). Postoperative cerebrovascular accident was unrelated to warfarin use ( P = .32). The incidence of mediastinal bleeding requiring reexploration was similar (5.0% vs 7.4%), as were other bleeding complications in the first 90 days (1.1% vs 0.8%). No variables were predictive of bleeding by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although these data do not address the role of antiplatelet agents, early anticoagulation with warfarin after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement did not appear to protect against neurologic events.

Is INR between 2.0 and 3.0 the optimal level for Chinese patients on warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation?

AIM

To examine the optimal range of International Normalized Ratio (INR) for Chinese patients receiving warfarin for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the ambulatory setting of a 1400-bed public teaching hospital in Hong Kong. The INR measurements and occurrence of serious or life-threatening haemorrhagic and thromboembolic events among patients newly started on warfarin from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2001 for indications with target INR 2-3 were analysed. The INR-specific incidence of bleeding and thromboembolism were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 491 patients were included, contributing to 453 patient-years of observation period. Forty-seven of the 491 patients experienced 25 haemorrhagic events (5.5 per 100 patient-years) and 27 thromboembolic events (6.0 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient-time spent within therapeutic INR range (2-3), INR <2 and INR >3 were 50, 44 and 6%, respectively. The incidence of either haemorrhagic or thromboembolic events was lowest (< or =4 events per 100 patient-years) at INR values between 1.8 and 2.4.

CONCLUSIONS

An INR of 1.8-2.4 appeared to be associated with the lowest incidence rate of major bleeding or thromboembolic events in a cohort of Hong Kong Chinese patients receiving warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation.

Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications Following St. Jude Medical Valve Replacement

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Due to their inherent thrombogenicity, mechanical cardiac valves necessitate lifelong oral anticoagulation. Less intensive oral anticoagulation than recommended earlier might result in a lower incidence of bleeding complications without increasing the embolic hazard significantly.

DESIGN

Comparison of three different intensities of oral anticoagulation in a prospective, randomized multicenter design. Three months after valve replacement, patients were randomly assigned to stratum A, international normalized ratio (INR) 3.0 to 4.5; stratum B, INR 2.5 to 4.0; or stratum C, INR 2.0 to 3.5.

PATIENTS

Data from 2,735 patients following aortic valve replacement (AVR; n = 2,024), mitral valve replacement (MVR; n = 553), and combined AVR and MVR (n = 158) with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve (St. Jude Medical; St. Paul, MN) between July 1993 and May 1999 were analyzed, covering a total follow-up period of 6,801 patient-years. All complications were registered prospectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Fifty-one thromboembolic events (TEs) were documented, resulting in a linearized incidence of 0.75 TEs per 100 patient-years, 22 of which were minor (0.32% per patient-year), 10 were moderate (0.15% per patient-year), and 19 were severe (0.28% per patient-year). Thromboembolism following AVR was significantly lower than after MVR (0.53% per patient-year vs 1.64% per patient-year). Patients reported 1,687 bleeding complications (24.8% per patient-year). The vast majority of bleeding complications (n = 1,509; 22.2% per patient-year) were classified as minor, 140 were classified as moderate (2.06% per patient-year), and 38 were classified as severe (0.56% per patient-year). The clinically relevant incidences of moderate and severe TEs and bleeding complications were not significantly different between the three prespecified INR strata.

CONCLUSIONS

The intention-to-treat analysis of the results of the German Experience With Low Intensity Anticoagulation study leads to the unexpected result that despite a sophisticated reporting system, the incidence of moderate and severe TE and bleeding complications was comparably low in all INR strata and more or less within the so-called background incidence reported for an age-related "normal" population. This study supports reexamination of the intensity of anticoagulation in patients with the SJM valve.

[Can bioprostheses be implanted at younger ages?]

The choice between mechanical prosthesis (MP) and bioprosthesis (BP) depends on the respective advantages and disadvantages of the two types of valves. MP theoretically have an indefinite life span but carry the risk of thromboembolic events that requires anticoagulant therapy, which itself is responsible for hemorrhages. BP bear a theoretically lower thromboembolic risk but have a limited life span that requires reintervention at a subsequent date, latter when the patient is older at implantation and operated on for aortic replacement. Actually MP is preferred before 60 years and BP after 70 years. Between 60 and 70 years there is not consensus. The limit recommended is around 65 years for aortic replacement and 70 years for mitral replacement. This limit can change either for upper or lower limit depending on patient's life expectancy, technological improvements of MP as well as BP, improvements of medical follow up of anticoagulant therapy (either self testing or use of anti thrombin). In the future the age limit of implantation of BP can be lowered but MP didn't have their last word.

Adherence to a guideline for coumarins in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To asses the adherence in daily clinical practice to a guideline for anticoagulation during pregnancy.

METHODS

The Dutch anticoagulation clinics developed a pregnancy guideline for anticoagulant therapy in order to avoid foetal exposure to coumarins between the 6th and 9th week of gestation. Anticoagulation was studied in 282 prospectively-registered pregnant women, who were treated by 26 different anticoagulation clinics.

RESULTS

The guideline was adhered to in 93% of treated women. Conforming to the guideline, the majority of patients commenced anticoagulation with heparin in the first trimester (n = 81) or started treatment from the second trimester onwards (n = 168). At the time of conception, 31 anticoagulated women were on coumarin treatment. In 13 of these patients (42%), coumarins were withdrawn before the 6th gestational week. In two pregnant women coumarin therapy started unintentionally during the first trimester of gestation.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that the guideline under study is useful in daily clinical practice. A careful instruction of women of child-bearing age who need medication remains important.

The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. The article describes the antithrombotic effect of VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, the clinical applications of VKA therapy, and the optimal therapeutic range of VKAs, and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong, and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient's values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we suggest the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy with doses between 5 and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 2B). In the elderly and in other patient subgroups with an elevated bleeding risk, we suggest a starting dose at < or = 5 mg (Grade 2C). We recommend basing subsequent doses after the initial two or three doses on the results of INR monitoring (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with INRs above the therapeutic range and for patients requiring invasive procedures. For example, in patients with mild to moderately elevated INRs without major bleeding, we suggest that when vitamin K is to be given it be administered orally rather than subcutaneously (Grade 1A). For the management of patients with a low risk of thromboembolism, we suggest stopping warfarin therapy approximately 4 days before they undergo surgery (Grade 2C). For patients with a high risk of thromboembolism, we suggest stopping warfarin therapy approximately 4 days before surgery, to allow the INR to return to normal, and beginning therapy with full-dose unfractionated heparin or full-dose low-molecular-weight heparin as the INR falls (Grade 2C). In patients undergoing dental procedures, we suggest the use of tranexamic acid mouthwash (Grade 2B) or epsilon amino caproic acid mouthwash without interrupting anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2B) if there is a concern for local bleeding. For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we suggest a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 2B]. In patients with recurrent thromboembolic events with a therapeutic INR or other additional risk factors, we suggest a target INR of 3.0 (range, 2.5 to 3.5) [Grade 2C]. As models of anticoagulation monitoring and management, we recommend that clinicians incorporate patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, and follow-up, and good communication with patients concerning results and dosing decisions (Grade 1C+).