Hemodynamics during emotional stress in borderline and mild hypertension

Physiological reactivity to acute mental stress in essential hypertension-a systematic review

Objective

Exaggerated physiological reactions to acute mental stress (AMS) are associated with hypertension (development) and have been proposed to play an important role in mediating the cardiovascular disease risk with hypertension. A variety of studies compared physiological reactivity to AMS between essential hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) individuals. However, a systematic review of studies across stress-reactive physiological systems including intermediate biological risk factors for cardiovascular diseases is lacking.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search (PubMed) for original articles and short reports, published in English language in peer-reviewed journals in November and December 2022. We targeted studies comparing the reactivity between essential HT and NT to AMS in terms of cognitive tasks, public speaking tasks, or the combination of both, in at least one of the predefined stress-reactive physiological systems.

Results

We included a total of 58 publications. The majority of studies investigated physiological reactivity to mental stressors of mild or moderate intensity. Whereas HT seem to exhibit increased reactivity in response to mild or moderate AMS only under certain conditions (i.e., in response to mild mental stressors with specific characteristics, in an early hyperkinetic stage of HT, or with respect to certain stress systems), increased physiological reactivity in HT as compared to NT to AMS of strong intensity was observed across all investigated stress-reactive physiological systems.

Conclusion

Overall, this systematic review supports the proposed and expected generalized physiological hyperreactivity to AMS with essential hypertension, in particular to strong mental stress. Moreover, we discuss potential underlying mechanisms and highlight open questions for future research of importance for the comprehensive understanding of the observed hyperreactivity to AMS in essential hypertension.

Rostral cuneiform nucleus and the defence reaction: Direct and indirect midbrain-medullary 5-HT mechanisms in baroreflex inhibition

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Activation of the defence reaction inhibits the baroreflex response via the intermediate rostro-ventromedial medulla (B3 raphé) and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS). Our aim was to determine whether and how baroreflex inhibition, induced by the disinhibition of the rostral cuneiform nucleus (part of the defence pathway), involves 5-HT neurons in B3 and 5-HT₃ receptors in the NTS.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We performed immunohistochemistry and anatomical experiments to determine whether raphé 5-HT cells expressing Fos were directly targeted by the rostral cuneiform nucleus. The effect of blocking raphé 5-HT neurotransmission and NTS 5-HT₃ receptors on cuneiform-induced inhibition of the baroreflex cardiac response were also analysed.

KEY RESULTS

Bicuculline, microinjected into the rostral cuneiform nucleus, induced an increase of double-labelled Fos-5-HT-IR cells in both the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus (LPGi) and raphé magnus. The anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoaggutinin injected into the rostral cuneiform nucleus revealed a dense projection to the LPGi but not raphé magnus. Cuneiform-induced baroreflex inhibition was prevented by B3 injection of 8-OH-DPAT, a selective 5-HT_1A receptor agonist. Cuneiform disinhibition also failed to inhibit the baroreflex bradycardia after NTS microinjection of the 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist granisetron and in 5-HT₃ receptor knockout mice.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The rostral cuneiform nucleus participates in the defence inhibition of the baroreflex bradycardia via direct activation of the LPGi and via a projection to the raphé magnus to activate NTS 5-HT₃ receptors and inhibit second-order baroreflex neurons. These data bring new insights in primary and secondary mechanisms involved in vital baroreflex prevention during stress.

Reduced parasympathetic cardiac control in patients with hypertension at rest and under mental stress

The neurogenic component in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension has predominantly been analyzed with regard to the sympathetic part of the autonomous nervous system; the parasympathetic branch has largely been neglected. We investigated whether 54 normotensive (mean causal blood pressure [cBP]: 125 +/- 6/82 +/- 4 mm Hg), 41 borderline hypertensive (cBP: 134 +/- 8/90 +/- 5 mm Hg), and 34 hypertensive men (cBP: 152 +/- 13/101 +/- 5 mm Hg) without secondary target organ damage differed in parasympathetic cardiac control. Parasympathetic cardiac control was assessed via the amount of fast fluctuations (0.15 to 0.40 Hz; vagus band) and by the amount of respiratory-linked fluctuations (mean respiratory frequency +/- 0.03 Hz) in the power spectra of continuously registered interbeat intervals under the following conditions: mean of three rest phases with 10, 5, and 5 minutes' duration (REST); mean of two modes of a reaction time task with 10 and 5 minutes' duration (RTT); mean of 5 minutes' mental arithmetic plus noise (MA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that spectral energy in the so-called vagus band reveals the most prominent differences between blood pressure groups under all conditions: REST = normotensive, 2.70 +/- 0.31; borderline hypertensive, 2.55 +/- 0.33; and hypertensive, 2.43 +/- 0.43 (F[2.126] = 6.19; p < 0.01). RTT = normotensive, 2.41 +/- 0.35; borderline hypertensive, 2.19 +/- 0.33; and hypertensive, 2.17 +/- 0.46 (F[2.126] = 6.04; p < 0.01); MA = normotensive, 2.69 +/- 0.34; borderline hypertensive, 2.52 +/- 0.33; and hypertensive, 2.38 +/- 0.46 (F[2.126] = 7.04; p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Renal hemodynamics and cardiovascular reactivity in the prehypertensive stage

To examine whether sympathetic nervous activation has an impact on renal circulation in subjects at risk for high blood pressure, we assessed renal hemodynamics and cardiovascular response to mental stress in 40 healthy young white males, 12 normotensive subjects without and 14 with familial hypertension, and 14 with borderline hypertension. The response of systolic and diastolic blood pressure to mental stress was assessed while each patient performed a mental arithmetic task; this was taken as the parameter for the activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Renal plasma flow was measured by para-aminohippuric acid clearance under steady-state conditions. In parallel, glomerular filtration rate as a parameter for functional impairment of the kidneys was determined by creatinine clearance, and filtration fraction was also calculated. Patients with borderline hypertension were characterized by a reduced renal blood flow and increased filtration fraction in comparison with both normotensive groups. The increase in systolic blood pressure during mental stress was more pronounced in borderline hypertensives. We observed no significant difference in renal hemodynamics and cardiovascular response to mental stress between normotensives with and without a family history of hypertension. In the total population, cardiovascular response to mental stress was correlated with renal hemodynamics: The greater the increase in systolic blood pressure during mental stress, the lower was the renal plasma flow and the greater the filtration fraction. Thus, renal plasma flow was found to be already reduced and filtration fraction increased before sustained hypertension developed. Because this pattern in renal hemodynamics was related to cardiovascular response to mental stress, our data suggest that sympathetic activation already appeared to affect renal hemodynamics at the onset of essential hypertension.

Psychophysiological theories on sympathetic nervous system reactivity in the development of essential hypertension

Psychophysiological theories on the development of essential hypertension are reviewed and evaluated. Two interconnected theories that relate behavior to essential hypertension and account for individual differences in susceptibility to disease are the "hyperreactivity" theory and "the symptom specificity" theory. The "hyperreactivity" theory identifies individual differences in autonomic nervous system reactivity as the pathophysiological mechanism and the "symptom specificity" theory suggests that inflexible, stereotypical responding increases the risk to develop hypertension. Based on a literature review, these theories are examined. There exist both case/control and prospective studies on autonomic nervous system reactivity and the development of hypertension. It is concluded that a neurogenically mediated hyperreactivity to stress is a precursor and not an effect of hypertension. Tasks that call for active but not passive coping efforts are more efficient elicitors of reactivity differences between those at high and low risk to develop hypertension in case/control studies. In prospective studies, active tasks may also have a predictive advantage over passive with respect to blood pressure development. In the early phase of hypertension, an increased cardiovascular reactivity is accompanied by increased neuroendocrine activation. In the later phase, heightened reactivity is confined to the cardiovascular system. This does not prove but is consistent with the notion that transient episodes of increased cardiac output translate into essential hypertension by causing vascular hypertrophy. Case/control studies suggest that an increased "symptom specificity", with stereotypical responding across multiple stressors, is independent of cardiovascular reactivity and a precursor of hypertension. The literature lacks prospective studies on the clinical relevance of stereotypical responding. It is suggested that the presence of both hyperreactivity and symptom specificity in a single individual increases the risk to develop essential hypertension.

Haemodynamic adjustments to mental stress in normotensives and subjects with mildly elevated blood pressure

Cardiac output, heart rate, stroke volume, pre-ejection period, total peripheral resistance, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and oxygen consumption were monitored or derived in young men with mildly elevated casual blood pressures and unambiguously normotensive control subjects before, during, and after exposure to a mental arithmetic stress. Measurements were also taken while subjects underwent graded dynamic exercise. This permitted cardiac output-oxygen consumption regression equations to be calculated and, as a consequence, cardiac output during mental stress to be represented as additional cardiac output. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were higher during all phases of the study in the mildly elevated blood pressure group. An overall groups effect during the mental stress phase of the experiment was observed for cardiac output and pre-ejection period, and the effect for stroke volume was close to significance. Significant Groups X Periods interactions were found for cardiac output and additional cardiac output, and the heart rate effect was nearly significant. Post-hoc comparisons here indicated that, in the main, group differences in these cardiac variables were more evident during the mental arithmetic stress than during the pre- and post-task baseline periods. Total peripheral resistance did not differ reliably between groups and the cardiac effects were specific to the mental stress phase of the study.

Cardiac and blood pressure responses to mental stress in reactive hypertensives

To study the haemodynamic response to a standardized mental stress, we measured ascending aorta velocity using Doppler ultrasonography in 20 reactive ("white-coat") hypertensives and 20 age and sex matched normal controls (NC) familiar with the hospital setting. Reactive hypertensives (RH) had 3 office diastolic BP recordings between 90-110 mmHg and ambulatory BP less than 140/90 mmHg. The cardiac response to mental arithmetic was greater in RH than NC (minute distance, RH: +36.7 +/- 40.2% vs NC: +10.3 +/- 19%, p less than 0.05; peak velocity, RH: +8.4 +/- 16.5% vs NC: -1.4 +/- 11.9%, p less than 0.05), and there was a different peripheral resistance response (RH: -12.2 +/- 24.2% vs NC: +6.5 +/- 22%, p less than 0.05). We suggest that subjects with reactive hypertension have a strong cardiac response to mental stress and this could be a characteristic of this condition.

Effects of salt, race, and hypertension on reactivity to stressors

Blood pressure and heart rate reactivity to a psychological stressor and to a cold pressor test were examined in a group of 51 normotensive and 37 unmedicated hypertensive men. All were studied twice, once while the participants were maintained on a moderately high salt (200 meq sodium/day) diet and once while the participants were maintained on an extremely low salt (10 meq sodium/day) diet. Dietary salt had no effect on blood pressure or heart rate responses to the two stressors. The systolic and diastolic responses of the white participants to the psychological stressor were greater than those of the black participants (both p less than 0.05); however, there was no difference between blacks and whites in reactivity to the cold pressor challenge. As compared with the normotensive group, the hypertensive group reacted to the psychological stressor with increased responses in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate (all p less than 0.05). The hypertensive group also hyperresponded in terms of the systolic pressure response to the cold pressor task (p less than 0.05). Plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine responses were not significantly different across the two diets, races, or diagnoses.

Cardiovascular and metabolic activity at rest and during psychological and physical challenge in normotensives and subjects with mildly elevated blood pressure

Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory and metabolic activity were recorded prior to and during mental arithmetic and a video game task in 20 young men with mildly elevated casual systolic blood pressures. Twenty-five unambiguously normotensive young men were tested under the same protocol. For pretask baseline physiological activity, group differences emerged for all cardiovascular and metabolic variables; thus the elevated blood pressure group displayed not only higher resting cardiovascular levels than normotensive subjects, but higher levels of metabolic activity too. With regard to change in physiological activity from rest to task, the group with mildly elevated blood pressure showed reliably larger increases in heart rate to the mental arithmetic task than the normotensive subjects. These effects, however, were not paralleled by group differences in metabolic activity increase. Physiological measures were also taken prior to and during graded dynamic exercise. The subsequent calculation of individual heart rate-oxygen consumption exercise regression lines allowed the comparison of actual and predicted heart rates during psychological challenge. The subjects with mildly elevated blood pressure displayed significantly greater discrepancies between actual and predicted heart rate values than normotensives during the psychological tasks in general and mental arithmetic in particular. Group differences in physiological activity during exercise largely reflected the pattern seen at rest. A possible exception here was systolic blood pressure. Not only were systolic blood pressure levels higher throughout the exercise phase for mildly elevated blood pressure subjects, but this group evidenced more of an increase from rest to exercise than the normotensives.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: practical considerations

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) allows one to evaluate the blood pressure (BP) profile over a 24-hour period in the patient's natural environment. Casual pressure measurements in the physician's office can be affected by alarm reactions, thus causing "white coat" hypertension. ABPM allows one to evaluate these reactions and determine the average pressure and variability of BP along with the effects of physical activity and emotional arousal on BP patterns while at work, at home, and during sleep. Average pressures determined by ABPM are more predictive of target organ involvement and cardiovascular complications of hypertension than casual monitoring of BP in the clinic. The absence of physiologic decline in arterial pressure during sleep is associated with increased prevalence of atherosclerotic complications and left ventricular hypertrophy as well as impairment of the autonomic nervous system. Although further prospective studies are needed to confirm the benefits of home pressure readings and ABPM, ABPM can be helpful in the diagnosis and determination of prognosis and therapeutic responses in a select group of patients.

Hemodynamic response patterns to mental stress: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Stress has been identified as contributing to the development of cardiovascular disease. The pathophysiologic link between stress and disease still remains unclear. Because experimental stress testing in the laboratory permits the examination of the underlying mechanism for stress-induced blood pressure, analyses of cardiovascular reactivity during emotional stress could be of particular clinical importance. The analyses of pooled data during the past 6 years (n = 298, age from 20 to 60 years, normotensive subjects as well as patients with borderline and mild essential hypertension) reveal that stress-induced changes in stroke volume and especially in total peripheral resistance are crucial parameters to analyze the hemodynamic stress response. However, neither those simple nor complex response patterns such as "hot reactor" describe clinically distinct subgroups of persons. When physiologic testing was repeated in hypertensive patients after effective long-term antihypertensive therapy with clonidine, oxprenolol, nitrendipine, or enalapril, no attenuation of the stress-induced increase in blood pressure was found in any of these groups. However, heart rate reactivity and stress-induced changes in total peripheral resistance were altered significantly by oxprenolol and nitrendipine. The beta-adrenoceptor blocker decreased heart rate reactivity and increased reactivity of peripheral resistance; the calcium antagonist decreased stress-induced changes in peripheral resistance and increased the heart rate response. The centrally acting sympatholytic regimen and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor had no impact on the hemodynamic response pattern during emotional challenge.

Disparate hemodynamic responses to mental challenge after antihypertensive therapy with beta blockers and calcium entry blockers

The hemodynamic response to mental challenge was studied in 40 male outpatients with mild essential hypertension. The patients were treated randomly either with a beta adrenoreceptor blocker (oxprenolol) or with a calcium entry blocker (nitrendipine). Cardiovascular reactivity was evaluated with two different mental arithmetic tasks before and six months after treatment by continuously measuring systolic and diastolic pressure (ultrasonic Doppler device), heart rate (electrocardiography), and stoke volume (impedance cardiography). Patients in both treatment groups had equal decreases in arterial pressure and the same pressures at rest. In patients receiving calcium entry blockers, mental challenge provoked an increase in stroke volume and a decrease in total peripheral resistance similar to results in the pretreatment phase. In contrast, beta adrenoreceptor blockade reversed the hemodynamic response pattern to a distinct decrease in stroke volume (p less than or equal to 0.05) and an increase in total peripheral resistance (p less than or equal to 0.05). In addition, an attenuated heart rate response (p less than or equal to 0.01) and a larger increase in diastolic pressure (p less than or equal to 0.01) were found in the beta blocker group compared with the calcium entry blocker group. Although beta blockers and calcium blockers produce equal decreases in arterial pressure, beta blockers evoke an abnormal hemodynamic response to mental challenge, whereas calcium entry blockers preserve the physiologic reactivity pattern of the untreated state.

Cognitive stress and cardiovascular reactivity. I. Relationship to hypertension

This report reviews the current literature relating cognitive stress and cardiovascular reactivity to the development of hypertension. Cardiovascular reactivity may refer to a change in one or several cardiovascular parameters as a function of exposure to a cognitive stressor, e.g., systolic BP, HR, etc. The cognitive stressors involve laboratory-based mental tasks such as mental mathematics, choice reaction time, and stressful interviews. The current findings suggest that the reactivity literature may have something unique to contribute to the study of hypertension. Prospective studies linking clinical hypertension to early reactivity are few in number. However, reactivity appears to be reliable within individuals over short periods of time (3 months), and individuals at the upper end of the reactivity distribution may have a higher incidence of future hypertension than those at the lower end. Reactivity may also contribute to two other dimensions of hypertension. Subjects with positive family histories of hypertension may be expected to be among the most reactive to cognitive stress, and among established hypertensive individuals, the reactivity to stress may be correlated with casual BP lability. Several avenues have been suggested through which a hyperresponsiveness to mental stress may be implicated in the development of hypertension. Repeated stressor episodes might influence vascular rigidity, through direct alteration of smooth muscle morphology and downregulation of the alpha receptor or through a process of autoregulation of CO, blood volume, and changes in renal regulation of water and sodium balance.