The screening and management of newborns at risk for low blood glucose

Relationship between EEG spectral power and dysglycemia with neurodevelopmental outcomes after neonatal encephalopathy

OBJECTIVE

We investigated how electroencephalography (EEG) quantitative measures and dysglycemia relate to neurodevelopmental outcomes following neonatal encephalopathy (NE).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 90 neonates with encephalopathy who received therapeutic hypothermia. EEG absolute spectral power was calculated during post-rewarming and 2-month follow-up. Measures of dysglycemia (hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glycemic lability) and glucose variability were computed for the first 48 h of life. We evaluated the ability of EEG and glucose measures to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes at ≥ 18 months, using logistic regressions (with area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] curves).

RESULTS

The post-rewarming global delta power (average all electrodes), hyperglycemia and glycemic lability predicted moderate/severe neurodevelopmental outcome separately (AUROC = 0.8, 95%CI [0.7,0.9], p < .001) and even more so when combined (AUROC = 0.9, 95%CI [0.8,0.9], p < .001). After adjusting for NE severity and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain injury, only global delta power remained significantly associated with moderate/severe neurodevelopmental outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9, 95%CI [0.8,1.0], p = .04), gross motor delay (OR = 0.9, 95%CI [0.8,1.0], p = .04), global developmental delay (OR = 0.9, 95%CI [0.8,1.0], p = .04), and auditory deficits (OR = 0.9, 95%CI [0.8,1.0], p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In NE, global delta power post-rewarming was predictive of outcomes at ≥ 18 months.

SIGNIFICANCE

EEG markers post-rewarming can aid prediction of neurodevelopmental outcomes following NE.

Infant friendly adhesive film containing glucose for neonatal hypoglycemia

Neonatal hypoglycemia is a common disease in newborns, which can precipitate energy shortage and follow by irreversible brain and neurological injury. Herein, we present a novel approach for treating neonatal hypoglycemia involving an adhesive polyvinylpyrrolidone/gallic acid (PVP/GA) film loading glucose. The PVP/GA film with loose cross-linking can be obtained by mixing their ethanol solution and drying complex. When depositing this soft film onto wet tissue, it can absorb interfacial water to form a hydrogel with a rough surface, which facilitates tight contact between the hydrogel and tissue. Meanwhile, the functional groups in the hydrogels and tissues establish both covalent and non-covalent bonds, leading to robust bioadhesion. Moreover, the adhered PVP/GA hydrogel can be detached without damaging tissue as needed. Furthermore, the PVP/GA films exhibit excellent antibacterial properties and biocompatibility. Notably, these films effectively load glucose and deliver it to the sublingual tissue of newborn rabbits, showcasing a compelling therapeutic effect against neonatal hypoglycemia. The strengths of the PVP/GA film encompass excellent wet adhesion in the wet and highly dynamic environment of the oral cavity, on-demand detachment, antibacterial efficacy, biocompatibility, and straightforward preparation. Consequently, this innovative film holds promise for diverse biomedical applications, including but not limited to wearable devices, sealants, and drug delivery systems.

Pulmonary Hypertension and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Neonates Treated with Diazoxide

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of adverse outcomes, specifically pulmonary hypertension (PH) and suspected or confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and their associated risk factors, in neonates treated with diazoxide.

STUDY DESIGN

 A retrospective study in infants born ≥ 316/7 weeks and admitted between January 2014 and June 2020. Combined adverse outcomes possibly associated to diazoxide were PH (systolic pulmonary pressure of ≥40 mm Hg or an eccentricity index ≥1.3) and suspected or confirmed NEC (suspected: stop feeds and antibiotics and confirmed: modified Bell stage ≥2). Echocardiography data extractors were masked to infants' characteristics.

RESULTS

 A total of 63 infants were included; 7 (11%) with suspected and 1 (2%) with confirmed NEC. Of the 36 infants with an available echocardiography after initiation of diazoxide treatment, 12 (33%) had PH. All infants with suspected or confirmed NEC were males (p = 0.01), whereas PH occurred mostly in females (75%, p = 0.02). The combined adverse outcome occurred in 14/26 (54%) infants exposed to >10 mg/kg/day, compared to 6/37 (16%) exposed to ≤10 mg/kg/day (p = 0.006). This association remained significant after adjustment for sex, small for gestational age status, and gestational age at birth (odds ratio: 6.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-21.7, p = 0.005). Left ventricular dysfunction was found in 19 infants (30%) but was not discriminative for the combined outcome.

CONCLUSION

 PH and suspected or confirmed NEC were identified frequently in neonates treated with diazoxide. A total dose >10 mg/kg/day was associated with an increased occurrence of these complications.

KEY POINTS

· PH and suspected or confirmed NEC were frequently found in neonates treated with diazoxide.. · A total dose >10 mg/kg/day was associated with an increased occurrence of these complications.. · Echocardiography screening should be considered in neonates exposed to diazoxide..

Neonatal hypoglycaemia

Low blood concentrations of glucose (hypoglycaemia) soon after birth are common because of the delayed metabolic transition from maternal to endogenous neonatal sources of glucose. Because glucose is the main energy source for the brain, severe hypoglycaemia can cause neuroglycopenia (inadequate supply of glucose to the brain) and, if severe, permanent brain injury. Routine screening of infants at risk and treatment when hypoglycaemia is detected are therefore widely recommended. Robust evidence to support most aspects of management is lacking, however, including the appropriate threshold for diagnosis and optimal monitoring. Treatment is usually initially more feeding, with buccal dextrose gel, followed by intravenous dextrose. In infants at risk, developmental outcomes after mild hypoglycaemia seem to be worse than in those who do not develop hypoglycaemia, but the reasons for these observations are uncertain. Here, the current understanding of the pathophysiology of neonatal hypoglycaemia and recent evidence regarding its diagnosis, management, and outcomes are reviewed. Recommendations are made for further research priorities.

Cord-Blood Derived Chemistry Reference Values in Preterm Infants for Sodium, Chloride, Potassium, Glucose, and Creatinine

OBJECTIVE

 International guidelines recommend that preterm infants should be supported to maintain their serum electrolytes within "normal" ranges. In term babies, cord blood values differed in pathological pregnancies from healthy ones.

STUDY DESIGN

 We examined cord blood sodium, chloride, potassium, glucose, and creatinine to derive maturity-related reference intervals. We examined associations with gestational age, delivery mode, singleton versus multiple, and prenatal maternal adverse conditions. We compared preterm cord values to term, and to adult reference ranges.

RESULTS

 There were 591 infants, 537 preterm and 54 term. Preterm cord glucose levels were steady (3.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L), while sodium, chloride, and creatinine increased over GA by 0.17, 0.14 mmol/L/week, and 1.07 µmol/L/week, respectively (p < 0.003). Average preterm cord potassium and chloride were higher than the term (p < 0.05). Compared with adult reference intervals, cord preterm reference intervals were higher for chloride (100-111 vs. 98-106 mmol/L), lower for creatinine (29-84 vs. 62-115 µmol/L), and more variable for potassium (2.7-7.9 vs. 3.5-5.0 mmol/L) and sodium (130-141 vs. 136-145 mmol/L). Cesarean section was associated with higher potassium and lower glucose, multiple births with higher chloride and creatinine and lower glucose, and SGA with lower glucose.

CONCLUSION

 Cord blood values varied across the GA range with increases in sodium, chloride, and creatinine, while glucose remained steady. Average preterm reference values were higher than term values for potassium and chloride. Preterm reference values differed from published adults' reference values. The changes across GA and by delivery mode, SGA, and being a multiple, which may have direct implications for neonatal care and fluid management.

KEY POINTS

· Cord blood electrolyte, creatinine, and glucose values vary across neonatal gestational age.. · Average preterm cord values of potassium and chloride were higher than term values.. · Cord reference values differ by delivery mode, growth, and multiple impacting neonatal care decisions..

Fifteen-minute consultation: Investigation and management of hypoglycaemia in the term-born infant

Hypoglycaemia in term infants is very common. Deciding on appropriate investigations and management is often challenging. The aims of this article are to help with understanding when, how and why to investigate symptoms of hypoglycaemia in full-term infants (born ≥37 weeks' gestational age).

Transitional Neonatal Hypoglycemia and Adverse Neurodevelopment in Midchildhood

Importance

The circumstances under which neonatal hypoglycemia leads to brain damage remain unclear due to a lack of long-term data on the neurodevelopment of affected children. As a result, diagnostic strategies and treatment recommendations are inconsistent.

Objective

To evaluate whether the occurrence of severe transitional neonatal hypoglycemia (defined as having at least 1 blood glucose measurement of 30 mg/dL or below) is associated with adverse neurodevelopment in midchildhood.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study using neurodevelopmental testing of a retrospectively recruited cohort was conducted at a single-center tertiary hospital in Germany between March 2022 and February 2023. Children with neonatal blood glucose screening data were randomly selected from all births between 2010 and 2015. Frequency matching for sex, birth weight, gestational age, socioeconomic status, and primary risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia was performed. Children with persistent hypoglycemia diseases or any risk factor for adverse neurodevelopment except hypoglycemia were excluded. Data were analyzed between February 2023 and March 2023.

Exposure

At least 1 neonatal hypoglycemia measurement with blood glucose measuring 30 mg/dL or below vs all measured blood glucose levels above 30 mg/dL during postnatal blood glucose screening starting on the first day of life.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Cognitive function measured by full-scale IQ test. Secondary outcomes included standardized scales of motor, visual, and executive functions, and child behavior, each measured at ages 7 to 11 years.

Results

A total of 140 children (mean [SD] age 9.1 [1.3] years; 77 male [55.0%]) participated in the study. Children with severe neonatal hypoglycemia had a 4.8 points lower mean full-scale IQ than controls (107.0 [95% CI, 104.0-109.9] vs 111.8 [95% CI, 108.8-114.8]). They showed a 4.9-fold (95% CI, 1.5-15.5) increased odds of abnormal fine motor function and a 5.3-fold (95% CI, 2.1-13.3) increased odds of abnormal visual-motor integration. Significantly higher T scores for attention problems (58.2 [95% CI, 56.1-60.2] vs 54.6 [95% CI, 52.6-56.6]) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms (58.2 [95% CI, 56.2-60.2] vs 54.7 [95% CI, 52.8-56.7]) were reported by parents.

Conclusions and Relevance

Neonatal hypoglycemia with blood glucose levels of 30 mg/dL or below was associated with an increased risk for suboptimal neurodevelopmental outcomes in midchildhood. These findings imply that treatment strategies should aim to prevent episodes of hypoglycemia at these severely low levels.

Systematic review of guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, a series of clinical guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia have been developed in different countries and regions. This systematic review was aimed at providing evidence for clinical decision-making and providing ideas for future research by comparatively analyzing the contents of various guidelines.

METHODS

A multilateral approach was used, including comprehensive literature searches and online research. The retrieved studies were screened by two independent reviewers according to our inclusion criteria. The two reviewers independently extracted the descriptive data. Four appraisers assessed the guidelines using the AGREE-II instrument.

RESULTS

Ten clinical guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia were included, with a mean score of 45.28%-83.45% in six domains. The guidelines are relatively consistent in their recommendations on clinical symptoms of neonatal hypoglycemia, but different in risk factors, preventive measures, thresholds for clinical management of hypoglycemia, target glucose ranges for its control, and pharmacotherapy.

CONCLUSION

By summarising the recommendations in the guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia, we found that blood glucose values were not the only observational indicator, and other indicators (e.g., ketone bodies, lactate) related to glucose metabolism should also be considered for a comprehensive assessment. There is still a lack of consensus on thresholds for the clinical management of hypoglycemia and target glucose ranges for its control, and the recommendations on its pharmacotherapy are rather simple and sketchy. In the future, more high-quality studies are required to further improve the early identification of neonatal hypoglycemia and intervention strategies against it.

The use of CGM to identify hypoglycemia and glycemic patterns in congenital hyperinsulinism

OBJECTIVES

Unrecognized hypoglycemia, especially in the neonatal population, is a significant cause of morbidity and poor neurologic outcomes. Children with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) are at risk of hypoglycemia and point of care testing (POCT) is the standard of care. Studies have shown that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycemic control and reduces the frequency of hypoglycemia among children with type 1 diabetes. There is limited experience with the use of CGM in children with HI. To assess the glycemic pattern of children with HI on stable therapy and evaluate the frequency of undetected hypoglycemia using Dexcom G6® CGM.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, observational pilot study was done in 10 children, ages 3 months to 17 years. Each child had a clinical or genetic diagnosis of HI on stable medical therapy. Participants were asked to continue their usual POCT blood glucose monitoring, as well as wear a blinded Dexcom G6® CGM during a 20-day study period with the potential of unblinding if there was severe hypoglycemia detected during the study trial.

RESULTS

During the study period, 26 hypoglycemic events were noted by CGM in 60 % of the participants with 45 % occurring between 0600 and 0800.

CONCLUSIONS

CGM can help detect hypoglycemia and blood glucose trends during a time when there is usually no POCT, which can guide medical management. 30 % of our population had a dose adjustment in their medications. This study was limited by population size.

Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at-risk neonates

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is a common condition that can be associated with brain injury. Current practice usually includes early identification of at-risk infants (e.g. infants of diabetic mothers; preterm, small- or large-for-gestational-age infants), and prophylactic measures are advised. However, these measures often involve use of formula milk or admission to the neonatal unit. Dextrose gel is non-invasive, inexpensive and effective for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Prophylactic dextrose gel can reduce the incidence of neonatal hypoglycaemia, thus potentially reducing separation of mother and baby and supporting breastfeeding, as well as preventing brain injury. This is an update of a previous Cochrane Review published in 2021.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral dextrose gel in preventing hypoglycaemia before first hospital discharge and reducing long-term neurodevelopmental impairment in newborn infants at risk of hypoglycaemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and Epistemonikos in April 2023. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing oral dextrose gel versus placebo, no intervention, or other therapies for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia. We included newborn infants at risk of hypoglycaemia, including infants of mothers with diabetes (all types), high or low birthweight, and born preterm (< 37 weeks), age from birth to 24 hours, who had not yet been diagnosed with hypoglycaemia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted investigators to obtain additional information. We used fixed-effect meta-analyses. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two studies conducted in high-income countries comparing oral dextrose gel versus placebo in 2548 infants at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Both of these studies were included in the previous version of this review, but new follow-up data were available for both. We judged these two studies to be at low risk of bias in 13/14 domains, and that the evidence for most outcomes was of moderate certainty. Meta-analysis of the two studies showed that oral dextrose gel reduces the risk of hypoglycaemia (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.95; risk difference (RD) -0.06, 95% CI -0.10 to -0.02; 2548 infants; high-certainty evidence). Evidence from two studies showed that there may be little to no difference in the risk of major neurological disability at two years of age after oral dextrose gel (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.68; 1554 children; low-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis of the two studies showed that oral dextrose gel probably reduces the risk of receipt of treatment for hypoglycaemia during initial hospital stay (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.00; 2548 infants; moderate-certainty evidence) but probably makes little or no difference to the risk of receipt of intravenous treatment for hypoglycaemia (RR 1.01, 0.68 to 1.49; 2548 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). Oral dextrose gel may have little or no effect on the risk of separation from the mother for treatment of hypoglycaemia (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.55; two studies, 2548 infants; low-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in the risk of adverse effects in infants who receive oral dextrose gel compared to placebo gel (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.33; two studies, 2510 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), but there are no studies comparing oral dextrose with other comparators such as no intervention or other therapies. No data were available on exclusive breastfeeding after discharge.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic oral dextrose gel reduces the risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia in at-risk infants and probably reduces the risk of treatment for hypoglycaemia without adverse effects. It may make little to no difference to the risk of major neurological disability at two years, but the confidence intervals include the possibility of substantial benefit or harm. Evidence at six to seven years is limited to a single small study. In view of its limited short-term benefits, prophylactic oral dextrose gel should not be incorporated into routine practice until additional information is available about the balance of risks and harms for later neurological disability. Additional large follow-up studies at two years of age or older are required. Future research should also be undertaken in other high-income countries, low- and middle-income countries, preterm infants, using other dextrose gel preparations, and using comparators other than placebo gel. There are three studies awaiting classification and one ongoing study which may alter the conclusions of the review when published.

Infants Eligible for Neonatal Hypoglycemia Screening: A Systematic Review

Importance

Neonatal hypoglycemia is common, occurring in up to 50% of infants at risk for hypoglycemia (infant of diabetic mother [IDM], small for gestational age [SGA], large for gestational age [LGA], and preterm) and is associated with long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Guidelines recommend screening infants at risk of hypoglycemia. The proportion of infants who require screening for neonatal hypoglycemia is unknown.

Objective

To determine the proportion of infants eligible for neonatal hypoglycemia screening using criteria from the highest-scoring critically appraised clinical guideline.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify clinical practice guidelines for neonatal hypoglycemia and took place at a tertiary maternity hospital in Auckland, New Zealand. Eligible guidelines were critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Using screening criteria extracted from the highest-scoring guideline, the proportion of infants eligible for neonatal hypoglycemia screening was determined in a retrospective observational cohort study of infants born January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. Infant participants were included if gestational age was 35 weeks or more, birth weight was 2000 g or more, and they were not admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit less than 1 hour after birth. The data were analyzed from November 2022 through February 2023. A total of 101 372 infants met the inclusion criteria.

Exposure

Risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia.

Main Outcome

Proportion of infants eligible for neonatal hypoglycemia screening.

Results

The study team screened 2366 abstracts and 18 guidelines met inclusion criteria for appraisal. There was variability in the assessed quality of guidelines and a lack of consensus between screening criteria. The highest-scoring guideline defined screening criteria as: IDM, preterm (less than 37 weeks' gestation), SGA (less than 10th percentile), birth weight of less than 2500 g or more than 4500 g, LGA (more than 90th percentile), or gestational age more than 42 weeks. A total of 101 372 infants met criteria for inclusion in the cohort study; median (IQR) gestational age was 39 (38-40) weeks and 51% were male. The overall proportion of infants eligible for screening was 26.3%. There was an increase in the proportion of eligible infants from 25.6% to 28.5% over 15 years, which was not statistically significant after adjustment for maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, and multiple pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93-1.03; change in proportion per year).

Conclusion

A systematic review found that practice guidelines providing recommendations for clinical care of neonatal hypoglycemia were of variable quality with is a lack of consensus regarding definitions for infants at risk for hypoglycemia. In the cohort study, one-quarter of infants were eligible for hypoglycemia screening. Further research is required to identify which infants may benefit from neonatal hypoglycemia screening.

International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Hyperinsulinism

BACKGROUND

Hyperinsulinism (HI) due to dysregulation of pancreatic beta-cell insulin secretion is the most common and most severe cause of persistent hypoglycemia in infants and children. In the 65 years since HI in children was first described, there has been a dramatic advancement in the diagnostic tools available, including new genetic techniques and novel radiologic imaging for focal HI; however, there have been almost no new therapeutic modalities since the development of diazoxide.

SUMMARY

Recent advances in neonatal research and genetics have improved our understanding of the pathophysiology of both transient and persistent forms of neonatal hyperinsulinism. Rapid turnaround of genetic test results combined with advanced radiologic imaging can permit identification and localization of surgically-curable focal lesions in a large proportion of children with congenital forms of HI, but are only available in certain centers in "developed" countries. Diazoxide, the only drug currently approved for treating HI, was recently designated as an "essential medicine" by the World Health Organization but has been approved in only 16% of Latin American countries and remains unavailable in many under-developed areas of the world. Novel treatments for HI are emerging, but they await completion of safety and efficacy trials before being considered for clinical use.

KEY MESSAGES

This international consensus statement on diagnosis and management of HI was developed in order to assist specialists, general pediatricians, and neonatologists in early recognition and treatment of HI with the ultimate aim of reducing the prevalence of brain injury caused by hypoglycemia. A previous statement on diagnosis and management of HI in Japan was published in 2017. The current document provides an updated guideline for management of infants and children with HI and includes potential accommodations for less-developed regions of the world where resources may be limited.

Diagnosis and Management of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: A Comprehensive Review of Guidelines

Hypoglycemia represents one of the most frequent metabolic disturbances of the neonate, associated with increased morbidity and mortality, especially if left untreated or diagnosed after the establishment of brain damage. The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from the most recently published influential guidelines on the diagnosis, screening, prevention and management of this common neonatal complication. Therefore, a descriptive review of the guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM), the European Foundation for the Care of the Newborn Infants (EFCNI), the Queensland Clinical Guidelines-Australia (AUS), the Canadian Pediatric Society (CPS) and the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) on neonatal hypoglycemia was carried out. There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines on the risk factors, the clinical signs and symptoms of NH, and the main preventive strategies. Additionally, the importance of early recognition of at-risk infants, timely identification of NH and prompt initiation of treatment in optimizing the outcomes of hypoglycemic neonates are universally highlighted. All medical societies, except PES, recommend screening for NH in asymptomatic high-risk and symptomatic newborn infants, but they do not provide consistent screening approaches. Moreover, the reviewed guidelines point out that the diagnosis of NH should be confirmed by laboratory methods of BGL measurement, although treatment should not be delayed until the results become available. The definition of NH lacks uniformity and it is generally agreed that a single BG value cannot accurately define this clinical entity. Therefore, all medical societies support the use of operational thresholds for the management of NH, although discrepancies exist regarding the recommended cut-off values, the optimal treatment and surveillance strategies of both symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemic neonates as well as the treatment targets. Over the past several decades, ΝH has remained an issue of keen debate as it is a preventable cause of brain injury and neurodevelopmental impairment; however, there is no clear definition or consistent treatment policies. Thus, the establishment of specific diagnostic criteria and uniform protocols for the management of this common biochemical disorder is of paramount importance as it will hopefully allow for the early identification of infants at risk, the establishment of efficient preventive measures, the optimal treatment in the first hours of a neonate's life and, subsequently, the improvement of neonatal outcomes.

Management of Neonatal Isolated and Combined Growth Hormone Deficiency: Current Status

Congenital growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is a rare disease caused by disorders affecting the morphogenesis and function of the pituitary gland. It is sometimes found in isolation but is more frequently associated with multiple pituitary hormone deficiency. In some cases, GHD may have a genetic basis. The many clinical signs and symptoms include hypoglycaemia, neonatal cholestasis and micropenis. Diagnosis should be made by laboratory analyses of the growth hormone and other pituitary hormones, rather than by cranial imaging with magnetic resonance imaging. When diagnosis is confirmed, hormone replacement should be initiated. Early GH replacement therapy leads to more positive outcomes, including reduced hypoglycaemia, growth recovery, metabolic asset, and neurodevelopmental improvements.

Neonatal hypoglycemia: lack of evidence for a safe management

Neonatal hypoglycemia affects up to 15% of all newborns. Despite the high prevalence there is no uniform definition of neonatal hypoglycemia, and existing guidelines differ significantly in terms of when and whom to screen for hypoglycemia, and where to set interventional thresholds and treatment goals. In this review, we discuss the difficulties to define hypoglycemia in neonates. Existing knowledge on different strategies to approach this problem will be reviewed with a focus on long-term neurodevelopmental outcome studies and results of interventional trials. Furthermore, we compare existing guidelines on the screening and management of neonatal hypoglycemia. We summarize that evidence-based knowledge about whom to screen, how to screen, and how to manage neonatal hypoglycemia is limited - particularly regarding operational thresholds (single values at which to intervene) and treatment goals (what blood glucose to aim for) to reliably prevent neurodevelopmental sequelae. These research gaps need to be addressed in future studies, systematically comparing different management strategies to progressively optimize the balance between prevention of neurodevelopmental sequelae and the burden of diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Unfortunately, such studies are exceptionally challenging because they require large numbers of participants to be followed for years, as mild but relevant neurological consequences may not become apparent until mid-childhood or even later. Until there is clear, reproducible evidence on what blood glucose levels may be tolerated without negative impact, the operational threshold needs to include some safety margin to prevent potential long-term neurocognitive impairment from outweighing the short-term burden of hypoglycemia prevention during neonatal period.

Technical Update No. 439: Antenatal Corticosteroids at Late Preterm Gestation

OBJECTIVE

To update recommendations for administration of antenatal corticosteroids in the late preterm period.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant individuals at risk of preterm birth from 340 to 366 weeks gestation.

OPTIONS

Administration or non-administration of a single course of antenatal corticosteroids at 340 to 366 weeks gestation.

OUTCOMES

Neonatal morbidity (respiratory distress, hypoglycemia), long-term neurodevelopment, and other long-term outcomes (growth, cardiac/metabolic, respiratory).

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Administration of antenatal corticosteroids from 340 to 366 weeks gestation decreases the risk of neonatal respiratory distress but increases the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia. The long-term impacts of antenatal corticosteroid administration from 340 to 366 weeks gestation are uncertain.

EVIDENCE

For evidence on the neonatal effects of antenatal corticosteroid administration at late preterm gestation, we summarized evidence from the 2020 Cochrane review of antenatal corticosteroids and combined this with evidence from published randomized trials identified by searching Ovid MEDLINE from January 1, 2020, to May 11, 2022. Given the absence of direct evidence on the impact of late preterm antenatal corticosteroid administration on neurodevelopmental outcomes, we summarized evidence on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids across gestational ages on neurodevelopmental outcomes using the following sources: (1) the 2020 Cochrane review; and (2) evidence obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception to January 5, 2022. We did not apply date or language restrictions. Given the absence of direct evidence on the impact of late preterm antenatal corticosteroid administration on other long-term outcomes, we summarized evidence on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids across gestational ages on other long-term outcomes by combining findings from the 2020 Cochrane review with evidence obtained by searching Ovid MEDLINE for observational studies related to long-term cardiometabolic, respiratory, and growth effects of antenatal corticosteroids from inception to October 22, 2021. We reviewed reference lists of included studies and relevant systematic reviews for additional references. See Appendix A for search terms and summaries.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix B (Tables B1 for definitions and B2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternity care providers, including midwives, family physicians, and obstetricians.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Neonatal Golden Hour: a review of current best practices and available evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recommendations made by several scientific bodies advocate for adoption of evidence-based interventions during the first 60 min of postnatal life, also known as the 'Golden Hour', to better support the fetal-to-neonatal transition. Implementation of a Golden Hour protocol leads to improved short-term and long-term outcomes, especially in extremely premature and extreme low-birth-weight (ELBW) neonates. Unfortunately, several recent surveys have highlighted persistent variability in the care provided to this vulnerable population in the first hour of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since its first adoption in the neonatal ICU (NICU) in 2009, published literature shows a consistent benefit in establishing a Golden Hour protocol. Improved short-term outcomes are reported, including reductions in hypothermia and hypoglycemia, efficiency in establishing intravenous access, and timely initiation of fluids and medications. Additionally, long-term outcomes report decreased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

SUMMARY

Critical to the success and sustainability of any Golden Hour initiative is recognition of the continuous educational process involving multidisciplinary team collaboration to ensure coordination between providers in the delivery room and beyond. Standardization of practices in the care of extremely premature neonates during the first hour of life leads to improved outcomes.

VIDEO ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/MOP/A68 .

Fewer glucose checks and decreased supplementation using dextrose gel for asymptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of a neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) clinical pathway implementing buccal dextrose gel in late preterm and term infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Quality improvement study at a children's hospital associated birth center. Number of blood glucose checks, use of supplemental milk, and need for IV glucose were followed for 26-months after implementation of dextrose gel and compared to previous 16-month period.

RESULTS

After QI implementation, 2703 infants were screened for hypoglycemia. Of these, 874 (32%) received at least one dose of dextrose gel. Special cause shifts with reductions in mean number of blood glucose checks per infant (pre 6.6 vs. post 5.6), use of supplemental milk (pre 42% vs. post 30%), and need for IV glucose (pre 4.8% vs. post 3.5%) were found.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating dextrose gel into a clinical pathway for NH was associated with a sustained reduction in number of interventions, use of supplemental milk and need for IV glucose.

Association between newborn hypoglycemia screening and breastfeeding success in an Ottawa, Ontario, hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There has been limited investigation of the unintended effects of routine screening for asymptomatic hypoglycemia in at-risk newborns. This study aimed to explore whether rates of exclusive breastfeeding were lower in screened babies than in unscreened babies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study conducted in Ottawa, Canada, used data from Hôpital Montfort's electronic health information system. Healthy singleton newborns discharged between Feb. 1, 2014, and June 30, 2018, were included. We excluded babies and mothers with conditions expected to interfere with breastfeeding (e.g., twins). We investigated the association between postnatal screening for hypoglycemia and initial exclusive breastfeeding (in the first 24 hours of life).

RESULTS

We included 10 965 newborns; of these, 1952 (17.8%) were fully screened for hypoglycemia. Of screened newborns, 30.6% exclusively breastfed and 64.6% took both formula and breastmilk in the first 24 hours of life. Of unscreened newborns, 45.4% exclusively breastfed and 49.8% received both formula and breastmilk. The adjusted odds ratio for exclusive breastfeeding in the first 24 hours of life among newborns screened for hypoglycemia was 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.51-0.64).

INTERPRETATION

The association of routine newborn hypoglycemia screening with a lower initial rate of exclusive breastfeeding suggests a potential effect of screening on early breastfeeding success. Confirmation of these findings might warrant a re-evaluation of the net benefit of asymptomatic postnatal hypoglycemia screening for different newborn populations at risk of hypoglycemia.

Outcome at 4.5 years after dextrose gel treatment of hypoglycaemia: follow-up of the Sugar Babies randomised trial

OBJECTIVE

Dextrose gel is used to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia, but later effects are unknown.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Follow-up of participants in a randomised trial recruited in a tertiary centre and assessed in a research clinic.

PATIENTS

Children who were hypoglycaemic (<2.6 mmol/L) recruited to the Sugar Babies Study (>35 weeks, <48 hours old) and randomised to treatment with 40% dextrose or placebo gel.

INTERVENTIONS

Assessment of neurological status, cognitive ability (Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence), executive function (five tasks), motor function (Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2)), vision, visual processing (Beery-Buktenica Development Test of Visual Motor Integration (Beery VMI) and motion coherence thresholds) and growth at 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neurosensory impairment (cerebral palsy; visual impairment; deafness; intelligence quotient <85; Beery VMI <85; MABC-2 score <15th centile; low performance on executive function or motion coherence).

RESULTS

Of 237 babies randomised, 185 (78%) were assessed; 96 randomised to dextrose and 89 to placebo gel. Neurosensory impairment was similar in both groups (dextrose 36/96 (38%) vs placebo 34/87 (39%), relative risk 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.34, p=0.83). Secondary outcomes were also similar, except children randomised to dextrose had worse visual processing scores (mean (SD) 94.5 (15.9) vs 99.8 (15.9), p=0.02) but no differences in the proportion with visual processing scores <85 or other visual test scores. Children randomised to dextrose gel were taller (z-scores 0.18 (0.97) vs -0.17 (1.01), p=0.001) and heavier (0.57 (1.07) vs 0.29 (0.92), p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia (<2.6 mol/L) with dextrose gel does not alter neurosensory impairment at 4.5 years. However, further assessment of visual processing and growth may be warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN1260800062392.

(Un)warranted variation in local hospital protocols for neonatal referral to the pediatrician: An explorative study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Studies indicate unwarranted variation in a wide range of neonatal care practices, contributing to preventable morbidity and mortality. Unwarranted variation is the result of complex interactions and multiple determinants. One of the determinants contributing to unwarranted variation in care may be variation in local hospital protocols. The purpose of this study was to examine variation in the content of obstetric and neonatal protocols for six common indications for neonatal referral to the pediatrician: large for gestational age/macrosomia, small for gestational age/fetal growth restriction, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, vacuum extraction, forceps extraction, and cesarean birth.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study examining protocols for neonatal referral to the pediatrician in the obstetric and neonatal departments of all Dutch hospitals. Variation in protocols was analyzed between regions, between neonatal and obstetrics departments located in the same hospital, and within neonatal and obstetrics departments.

RESULTS

There was considerable variation in protocols between regions, between neonatal and obstetrics departments, and within neonatal and obstetrics departments. The results of this study showed considerable variation in recommendations for type of referral, admission, screening/diagnostic tests, treatment, and discharge. Furthermore, results generally showed lower referral thresholds in neonatal departments compared with obstetric departments, and higher referral thresholds in the eastern region of the Netherlands. We also found variation in local hospital protocols, which could not be explained by population characteristics but which may be explained by varying recommendations in existing national and international guidelines and/or lack of adherence to these guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce unwarranted variation in local protocols, evidence-based, multidisciplinary guidelines should be developed in the Netherlands. Further research addressing knowledge gaps is needed to inform these guidelines. Attention should be paid to the implementation of evidence, and only where evidence is lacking or inconclusive should agreements be based on multidisciplinary consensus. Where protocols deviate from evidence-based guidelines because of specific local circumstances, clearer, more transparent justifications should be made. Uniformity in guidance will offer clear standards for care evaluation and provide opportunities to reduce inappropriate care.

Hipoglucemia persistente, un hallazgo poco frecuente y subestimado

La hipoglucemia persistente es un trastorno metabólico caracterizado por la incapacidad de autorregulación de la glucemia sérica posterior a las 72 horas de vida, secundario a un rango amplio de patologías, dentro de las cuales se encuentran: alteraciones metabólicas secundarias a patologías maternas (como la restricción del crecimiento intrauterino), los errores innatos del metabolismo (como los trastornos de almacenamiento del glucógeno), los trastornos de la betaoxidación y la alteración en las hormonas contrarreguladoras (como la deficiencia de la hormona de crecimiento). Su diagnóstico representa un reto debido a que, en ocasiones, los recién nacidos no presentan manifestaciones clínicas o estas son inespecíficas. La muestra crítica, un conjunto de exámenes paraclínicos séricos tomados en el periodo de hipoglucemia, permite la identificación rápida de las patologías causantes más comunes que requieren algún tratamiento específico. En el artículo se lleva a cabo una revisión narrativa de las patologías más comunes asociadas con la hipoglucemia persistente y la utilidad de la muestra crítica en su diagnóstico.

Metabolic acidosis during continuous glucagon therapy for neonatal hypoglycemia

Objectives

Refractory neonatal hypoglycemia may be treated with glucagon infusions, which have been associated with thrombocytopenia and hyponatremia. After anecdotally noting metabolic acidosis during glucagon therapy in our hospital, an outcome not previously reported in the literature, we aimed to quantify occurrence of metabolic acidosis (base excess >-6) as well as thrombocytopenia and hyponatremia during treatment with glucagon.

Methods

We performed a single-centre retrospective case series. Descriptive statistics were used and subgroups compared with Chi-Square, Fisher's Exact Test, and Mann-Whitney U testing.

Results

Sixty-two infants (mean birth gestational age 37.2 weeks, 64.5% male) were treated with continuous glucagon infusions for median 10 days during the study period. 41.2% were preterm, 21.0% were small for gestational age, and 30.6% were infants of diabetic mothers. Metabolic acidosis was seen in 59.6% and was more common in infants who were not born to diabetic mothers (75% versus 24% in infants of diabetic mothers, P<0.001). Infants with versus without metabolic acidosis had lower birth weights (median 2,743 g versus 3,854 g, P<0.01) and were treated with higher doses of glucagon (0.02 versus 0.01 mg/kg/h, P<0.01) for a longer duration (12.4 versus 5.9 days, P<0.01). Thrombocytopenia was diagnosed in 51.9% of patients.

Conclusions

In addition to thrombocytopenia, metabolic acidosis of unclear etiology appears to be very common with glucagon infusions for neonatal hypoglycemia, especially in lower birth weight infants or those born to mothers without diabetes. Further research is needed to elucidate causation and potential mechanisms.

Protecting against brain damage by improving treatment in neonates with hypoglycaemia: ProBrain-D-a study protocol of a prospective longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

Although neonatal hypoglycaemia is the most common metabolic problem in neonates, there is no standard guideline for screening. Additionally, treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia and glucose administration thresholds are discussed controversially. Severe hypoglycaemia can lead to brain damage, but data on the effects of mild hypoglycaemia on neurological development are limited. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective longitudinal cohort study to analyse if the implementation of a new diagnosis and treatment standard for neonatal hypoglycaemia may improve the outcome of neonates at risk for hypoglycaemia, especially concerning neurodevelopment. Furthermore, the acceptance and feasibility of the standard among different professional groups and parents are analysed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

After implementation of a structured standard operating procedure (SOP), detailing preventive measures, blood glucose screening and neonatal hypoglycaemia treatment in a tertiary care hospital, 678 neonates ≥35+0 weeks of gestation will be recruited in a monocentric prospective cohort study. For comparison, 139 children born before the implementation of this new SOP, who had risk factors for neonatal hypoglycaemia or qualified for blood glucose measurements are recruited (retrospective cohort). For the primary end point, comparative analyses between and within the prospective and retrospective cohorts will be performed regarding the neurological outcome at 2-2.5 years of age in Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Furthermore, comprehensive clinical data and data on nutrition and developmental milestones are assessed at different time points (6 weeks, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) in the prospective cohort. Acceptance and feasibility of the new standard are assessed using questionnaires.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf (20201162). The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00024086.

Neurological Surveillance in Moderate-Late Preterm Infants—Results from a Dutch–Canadian Survey

Preterm birth remains an important cause of abnormal neurodevelopment. While the majority of preterm infants are born moderate-late preterm (MLPT; 32–36 weeks), international and national recommendations on neurological surveillance in this population are lacking. We conducted an observational quantitative survey among Dutch and Canadian neonatal level I–III centres (June 2020–August 2021) to gain insight into local clinical practices on neurological surveillance in MLPT infants. All centres caring for MLPT infants designated one paediatrician/neonatologist to complete the survey. A total of 85 out of 174 (49%) qualifying neonatal centres completed the survey (60 level I–II and 25 level III centres). Admission of MLPT infants was based on infant-related criteria in 78/85 (92%) centres. Cranial ultrasonography to screen the infant’s brain for abnormalities was routinely performed in 16/85 (19%) centres, while only on indication in 39/85 (46%). In 57/85 (67%) centres, neurological examination was performed at least once during admission. Of 85 centres, 51 (60%) followed the infants’ development post-discharge, with follow-up duration ranging from 1–52 months of age. The survey showed a wide variety in neurological surveillance in MLPT infants among Dutch and Canadian neonatal centres. Given the risk for short-term morbidity and long-term neurodevelopmental disabilities, future studies are required to investigate best practices for in-hospital care and follow-up of MLPT infants.

Reliability and Observer Dependence of Signs of Neonatal Hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, using video documentation, the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability of visualizable signs of neonatal hypoglycemia at different glucose concentrations in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

In a prospective cohort study of 145 neonates with and without risk factors for hypoglycemia, 430 videos were recorded before blood glucose measurements and analyzed by 10 blinded investigators of different professions. The primary outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity for clinical detection of hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity to detect low blood glucose (<55 mg/dL [<3.1 mmol/L]) based on signs was 30%, and the specificity was 82%. Significantly more investigators suspected hypoglycemia while viewing videos of infants with blood glucose levels of 46-54 mg/dL (2.6-3.0 mmol/L) and 30-45 mg/dL (1.7-2.5 mmol/L) compared with ≥55 mg/dL (≥3.1 mmol/L) (29 ± 3% and 31 ± 4% vs 18 ± 1%; P = .001; P = .007). After 48 hours of life, significantly more investigators suspected hypoglycemia in videos of infants with blood glucose levels of ≤45 mg/dL (≤2.5 mmol/L) compared with blood glucose levels of >45 mg/dL (>2.5 mmol/L) (28.9 ± 8.1% vs 10.9 ± 1.8%; P = .007). For blood glucose levels 30-45 mg/dL (1.7-2.5 mmol/L), sensitivity varied widely between investigators, ranging from 5% to 62%. Three hypoglycemic episodes <30 mg/dL (<1.7 mmol/L) were only partially recognized.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical observation of signs is neither sensitive nor specific to detect neonatal hypoglycemia, and there are large interobserver differences. Thus, guidelines on neonatal hypoglycemia should reconsider whether distinguishing between asymptomatic and symptomatic hypoglycemia provides useful information for the management of neonatal hypoglycemia, because it may pose a risk for systematic under-recognition and undertreatment, leading to an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00021500 www.drks.de/drks_web/setLocale_EN.do.

Cerebral Effects of Neonatal Dysglycemia

This article summarizes the available evidence reporting the relationship between perinatal dysglycemia and long-term neurodevelopment. We review the physiology of perinatal glucose metabolism and discuss the controversies surrounding definitions of perinatal dysglycemia. We briefly review the epidemiology of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia in fetal, preterm, and term infants. We discuss potential pathophysiologic mechanisms contributing to dysglycemia and its effect on neurodevelopment. We highlight current strategies to prevent and treat dysglycemia in the context of neurodevelopmental outcomes. Finally, we discuss areas of future research and the potential role of continuous glucose monitoring.

Automated Microfluidic System with Active Mixing Enables Rapid Analysis of Biomarkers in 5 μL of Whole Blood

We developed a microfluidic device for the rapid analysis of biomarkers in small volumes of whole blood. This device includes an onboard plasma separation module connected to a downstream bioanalysis module in which plasma mixes with reagents and the results of a colorimetric assay are recorded. Actuation of onboard microvalves within a bioanalysis module creates active mixing conditions that allowed us to achieve solution homogeneity within 5 min. To demonstrate utility, we carried out glucose detection in our device. With 5 μL of whole blood as an input, our microfluidic device enabled a time-to-answer of 10 min with a limit of detection of 0.21 ± 0.04 mM for glucose. This device has immediate applications for rapid and sensitive monitoring of hypoglycemia at the point of care (POC). Furthermore, our automated microfluidic device represents a platform technology that may be used to detect other biomarkers in whole blood.

Thalamus L-Sign: A Potential Biomarker of Neonatal Partial, Prolonged Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury or Hypoglycemic Encephalopathy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Considerable overlap exists in the MR imaging features of hypoglycemic injury and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, with similar predilections for the occipital and parietal lobes. In partial, prolonged hypoxia-ischemia, there is cortical destruction at the interarterial watershed zones, and in concomitant hypoglycemia and hypoxia-ischemia, an exaggerated final common pathway injury occurs. We interrogated secondary white matter tract-based thalamic injury as a tool to separate pure injuries in each group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study of the MRIs of 320 children with a history of hypoxia-ischemia and/or hypoglycemia was undertaken with 3 major subgroups: 1) watershed-type hypoxic-ischemic injury, 2) neonatal hypoglycemia, and 3) both perinatal hypoxia-ischemia and proved hypoglycemia. Cerebral and thalamic injuries were assessed, particularly hyperintensity of the posterolateral margin of the thalami. A modified Poisson regression model was used to assess factors associated with such thalamic injury.

RESULTS

Parieto-occipital injuries occurred commonly in patients with hypoglycemia and/or hypoxia-ischemia. Eighty-five of 99 (86%) patients with partial, prolonged hypoxia-ischemia exhibited the thalamus L-sign. This sign was also observed in patients who had both hypoglycemia and hypoxia-ischemia, predominantly attributable to the latter. Notably, the risk of a thalamus L-sign injury was 2.79 times higher when both the parietal and occipital lobes were injured compared with when they were not involved (95% CI, 1.25-6.23; P = .012). The thalamus L-sign was not depicted in patients with pure hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose the thalamus L-sign as a biomarker of partial, prolonged hypoxia-ischemia, which is exaggerated in combined hypoglycemic/hypoxic-ischemic injury.

Directive clinique no 426 : Troubles hypertensifs de la grossesse : Diagnostic, prédiction, prévention et prise en charge

OBJECTIF

La présente directive a été élaborée par des fournisseurs de soins de maternité en obstétrique et en médecine interne. Elle aborde le diagnostic, l'évaluation et la prise en charge des troubles hypertensifs de la grossesse, la prédiction et la prévention de la prééclampsie ainsi que les soins post-partum des femmes avec antécédent de trouble hypertensif de la grossesse.

POPULATION CIBLE

Femmes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en œuvre des recommandations de la présente directive devrait réduire l'incidence des troubles hypertensifs de la grossesse, en particulier la prééclampsie, et des issues défavorables associées. DONNéES PROBANTES: La revue exhaustive de la littérature a été mise à jour en tenant compte des nouvelles données probantes jusqu'en décembre 2020 et en suivant la même méthodologie que pour la précédente directive de la Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada (SOGC) sur les troubles hypertensifs de la grossesse. La recherche s'est limitée aux articles publiés en anglais ou en français. Les recommandations relatives aux traitements s'appuient d'abord sur les essais cliniques randomisés et les revues systématiques (lorsque disponibles), ainsi que sur l'évaluation des résultats cliniques substantiels chez les mères et les bébés. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs se sont entendus sur le contenu et les recommandations par consensus et ont répondu à l'examen par les pairs du comité de médecine fœto-maternelle de la SOGC. Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE) et se sont gardé l'option de désigner certaines recommandations par la mention « bonne pratique ». Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). Le conseil d'administration de la SOGC a approuvé la version définitive aux fins de publication.

PROFESSIONNELS CIBLES

Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé (obstétriciens, médecins de famille, sages-femmes, infirmières et anesthésistes) qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes avant, pendant ou après la grossesse.

RECOMMANDATIONS

Variations in New Zealand and Australian guidelines for the management of neonatal hypoglycaemia: A secondary analysis from the hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose gel Trial (hPOD)

AIM

We observed wide variation in the management of babies at risk of hypoglycaemia who participated in the hPOD (hypoglycaemia Prevention with Oral Dextrose gel) multicentre trial of prophylactic dextrose gel. The aim of this study was to identify whether this may be due to variations in the clinical guidelines used by participating hospitals.

METHODS

Guidelines for management of neonatal hypoglycaemia used by participating hospitals were reviewed. Recommendations regarding definition, risk factors, monitoring and treatment were compared between countries, hospital type (tertiary or secondary) and neonatal intensive care unit size (≤12 cots and >12 cots).

RESULTS

The 18 hospitals used 20 guidelines. The recommended diagnostic threshold for hypoglycaemia ranged from <2.0 mmol/L to <2.6 mmol/L, and glucose oxidase method of testing was recommended in seven (47%) of 15 guidelines. There was broad agreement about which infants should be monitored. Oral dextrose was the recommended first line of treatment in 17 of 20 guidelines, but the glucose threshold at which this should be used varied (≤2.6 mmol/L in New Zealand, 1.5-2.6 mmol/L in Australia). Re-checking blood glucose concentrations after oral dextrose was recommended at 30 min in most (10/11, 91%) New Zealand guidelines but at 60 min in most (4/6, 67%) Australian guidelines. There was greatest variation in recommended thresholds for referral to paediatric services or neonatal intensive care unit, and administration of intravenous dextrose. There were no significant differences between guidelines used by tertiary and secondary hospitals, or large and small hospitals.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in guideline recommendations for the management of neonatal hypoglycaemia across New Zealand and Australian neonatal units.

Guideline No. 426: Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Diagnosis, Prediction, Prevention, and Management

OBJECTIVE

This guideline was developed by maternity care providers from obstetrics and internal medicine. It reviews the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs), the prediction and prevention of preeclampsia, and the postpartum care of women with a previous HDP.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of the recommendations in these guidelines may reduce the incidence of the HDPs, particularly preeclampsia, and associated adverse outcomes.

EVIDENCE

A comprehensive literature review was updated to December 2020, following the same methods as for previous Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) HDP guidelines, and references were restricted to English or French. To support recommendations for therapies, we prioritized randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews (if available), and evaluated substantive clinical outcomes for mothers and babies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors agreed on the content and recommendations through consensus and responded to peer review by the SOGC Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, along with the option of designating a recommendation as a "good practice point." See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication.

INTENDED USERS

All health care providers (obstetricians, family doctors, midwives, nurses, and anesthesiologists) who provide care to women before, during, or after pregnancy.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The clinical effect of glucose meter selection upon the detection of neonatal hypoglycemia

Neonatal hypoglycemia is a common, transitional metabolic state that may lead to poor neurodevelopmental outcomes if unrecognized or managed inadequately. Given its frequency of presentation and immense clinical significance, a myriad of clinical practice guidelines have been published outlining appropriate screening, diagnosis, and treatment principles-many endorsing the use of glucose point-of-care testing (POCT). Unfortunately, the well-intended 'march' toward POCT, with bedside glucose meters as screening devices in the NICU, has resulted in unintended consequences with critical implications: a lack of international traceability to the 'gold' standard glucose method by POCT devices, under-recognition of POCT limitations, and a reliance upon a technology primarily driven to detect hyperglycemia in the adult population as opposed to neonatal hypoglycemia. As providers continue to advocate for improved POCT, there must be robust communication between providers and the clinical laboratory in the selection, standardization, and interpretation of glucose POCT to ensure optimal neonatal glucose detection.

Oral Antihypertensives for Nonsevere Pregnancy Hypertension: Systematic Review, Network Meta- and Trial Sequential Analyses

BACKGROUND

We aimed to address which antihypertensives are superior to placebo/no therapy or another antihypertensive for controlling nonsevere pregnancy hypertension and provide future sample size estimates for definitive evidence.

METHODS

Randomized trials of antihypertensives for nonsevere pregnancy hypertension were identified from online electronic databases, to February 28, 2021 (registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; unique identifier: CRD42020188725). Our outcomes were severe hypertension, proteinuria/preeclampsia, fetal/newborn death, small-for-gestational age infants, preterm birth, and admission to neonatal care. A Bayesian random-effects model generated estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons. Trial sequential analysis informed future trials needed.

RESULTS

Of 1246 publications identified, 72 trials were included; 61 (6923 women) were informative. All commonly prescribed antihypertensives (labetalol, other β-blockers, methyldopa, calcium channel blockers, and mixed/multi-drug therapy) versus placebo/no therapy reduced the risk of severe hypertension by 30% to 70%. Labetalol decreased proteinuria/preeclampsia (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% credible interval, 0.54-0.99]) and fetal/newborn death (odds ratio, 0.54 [0.30-0.98]) compared with placebo/no therapy, and proteinuria/preeclampsia compared with methyldopa (odds ratio, 0.66 [0.44-0.99]) and calcium channel blockers (odds ratio, 0.63 [0.41-0.96]). No other differences were identified, but credible intervals were wide. Trial sequential analysis indicated that 2500 to 10 000 women/arm (severe hypertension or safety outcomes) to >15 000/arm (fetal/newborn death) would be required to provide definitive evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, all commonly prescribed antihypertensives in pregnancy reduce the risk of severe hypertension, but labetalol may also decrease proteinuria/preeclampsia and fetal/newborn death. Evidence is lacking for many other safety outcomes. Prohibitive sample sizes are required for definitive evidence. Real-world data are needed to individualize care.

Scoping review of evidence for managing postnatal hypoglycaemia

OBJECTIVES

To identify what is known empirically about the screening, treatment and harm of exposure to neonatal hypoglycaemia.

DESIGN

Scoping review that applied a preregistered protocol based on established frameworks.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase, up to 12 May 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Comparative and case-series studies, as well as guidelines, published in English or French, on the topic of immediate inpatient postnatal glucose screening in newborns.

DATA GATHERING

Article selection and characterisation were performed in duplicate using predefined data extraction forms specific to primary studies and guidelines.

RESULTS

12 guidelines and 74 primary studies were included. A neurodevelopmental outcome was primary in 32 studies: 30 observational studies followed up posthypoglycaemic, and the 2 intervention studies included 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT) about treatment thresholds. Three other RCTs assessed dextrose gel (two) and oral sucrose (one). 12 of 30 studies that evaluated non-neurodevelopmental primary outcomes were intervention studies. Only one cohort study compared outcomes in screened vs unscreened newborns. The guidelines did not arrive at a consensus definition of postnatal hypoglycaemic, and addressed potential harms of screening more often than primary studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary literature that informs hypoglycaemia screening is a series of studies that relate neurodevelopmental outcomes to postnatal hypoglycaemia. Further research is needed to better define an optimal threshold for hypoglycaemia that warrants intervention, based on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes and a better delineation of potential screening harms.

Expert consensus on standard clinical management of neonatal hypoglycemia in China (2021)

There are many high-risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia, and persistent severe hypoglycemia can lead to irreversible neurological damage and bring a great burden to family and society. Early standardized prevention and clinical management can effectively reduce the incidence rate of neonatal hypoglycemia and brain injury induced by hypoglycemia; however at present, there is still a lack of unified clinical management guidelines for neonatal hypoglycemia in China, and different medical institutions follow different clinical guidelines developed by other countries for the management of neonatal hypoglycemia. In order to further standardize the clinical management of neonatal hypoglycemia, this consensus is developed by the Group of Neonatology, Pediatric Society, Chinese Medical Association. This consensus provides 21 recommendations to address related clinical issues in the prevention, monitoring, and management of hypoglycemia in neonates with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks.

Hypoglycemia screening of asymptomatic newborns on the 2nd day of life

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hypoglycemia management in the first 48 hours is guided by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) recommendations. Our aim was to determine the incidence of hypoglycemia via point of care test (POCT) on the 2nd day of life (DOL) among healthy, asymptomatic neonates regardless of risk factors.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, preprandial point of care glucose concentration was measured on the 2nd DOL in 150 healthy, asymptomatic neonates in the newborn nursery. We used 50 mg/dl (2.8 mmol/L) as the hypoglycemia threshold based on PES recommendations.

RESULTS

The incidence of hypoglycemia on the second DOL was 10% among asymptomatic neonates (no risk factors = 8% ; late preterm birth (LPT) + small for gestational age (SGA) = 16% ; large for gestational age (LGA) + infant of diabetic mother (IDM) = 6%). SGA + LPT neonates accounted for the majority of the hypoglycemic cases (53.3%) and exhibited a trend towards the lowest glucose concentration (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of hypoglycemia on DOL 2 among asymptomatic neonates is high and of unclear significance in the absence of dedicated neurodevelopmental follow-up.

A feed-centric hypoglycaemia pathway ensures appropriate care escalation in at-risk infants

Background

There is a lack of clarity of what constitutes the starting point of a clinical pathway for infants at-risk of hypoglycaemia. Glucose-centric pathways (GCP) identify low glucose in the first 2 hours of life that may not represent clinical hypoglycaemia and can lead to inappropriate glucose management with infusions and medications.

Objective

To study the impact of a feed-centric pathway (FCP) on the number of admissions for hypoglycaemia to level 2 special care nursery (SCN) and the need for parenteral glucose/medications, compared to GCP.

Methods

This project was conducted over 2 years, before and after switching from a GCP to FCP in our institution. FCP involves skin-to-skin care, early breast feeding, checking glucose at 2 hours and use of buccal glucose. The primary outcome was the number of SCN admissions for hypoglycaemia. Secondary outcomes include the number of infants needing intravenous glucose, medications and length of SCN stay.

Results

Of 23 786 live births, 4438 newborns were screened. We screened more infants at-risk for hypoglycaemia using the FCP (GCP:1462/11969, 12.2% vs FCP:2976/11817, 25.1%) but significantly reduced SCN admissions (GCP:246/1462, 16.8% vs FCP:102/2976, 3.4%; p<0.0001). Fewer but proportionally more FCP newborns required intravenous glucose (GCP: 136/246, 55% vs FCP: 88/102, 86%; p=0.000). Compared with GCP, FCP reduced the total duration of stay in SCN by 104 days per annum, reducing the cost of care. However, the mean length of SCN stay for FCP was higher (GCP:2.43 days vs FCP:3.49 days; p=0.001). There were no readmissions for neonatal hypoglycaemia to our institution.

Conclusion

The use of FCP safely reduced SCN admissions, averted avoidable escalation of care and helped identify infants who genuinely required intravenous glucose and SCN care, allowing more efficient utilisation of healthcare resources.

Nutrition and management of glycemia in neonates with neonatal encephalopathy treated with hypothermia

Adequate nutrition and glycemic homeostasis are increasingly recognized as potentially neuroprotective for the developing brain. In the context of hypoxia-ischemia, evidence is scarce regarding optimal nutritional support and administration route, as well as the short- and long-term consequences of such interventions. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on disturbances of brain metabolism of glucose and substrates by hypoxia-ischemia, and compound effects of these mechanisms on brain injury characterized by specific patterns on EEG and MRI. Risks and benefits of nutrition delivery via parenteral or enteral routes are examined. Nutrition could mitigate adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, and the impact of nutritional strategies and specific nutritional interventions are reviewed. Limited literature highlights the need for further studies to understand the changes in energy metabolism during and after hypoxic-ischemic injury, to optimize nutritional regimens and glucose management, and to inform the neuroprotective role of nutrition.

Strategies to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia

Neonatal hypoglycaemia is associated with adverse development, particularly visual-motor and executive function impairment, in childhood. As neonatal hypoglycaemia is common and frequently asymptomatic in at-risk babies-ie, those born preterm, small or large for gestational age, or to mothers with diabetes, it is recommended that these babies are screened for hypoglycaemia in the first 1-2 days after birth with frequent blood glucose measurements. Neonatal hypoglycaemia can be prevented and treated with buccal dextrose gel, and it is also common to treat babies with hypoglycaemia with infant formula and intravenous dextrose. However, it is uncertain if screening, prophylaxis, or treatment improves long-term outcomes of babies at risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia. This narrative review assesses the latest evidence for screening, prophylaxis, and treatment of neonates at risk of hypoglycaemia to improve long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Practice Variations in Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypoglycemia in Asymptomatic Newborns

OBJECTIVES

To describe variations in the practice of hypoglycemia screening and treatment in asymptomatic infants in the United States.

METHODS

During the time period from February 2018 to June 2018, we surveyed representatives of hospitals participating in the Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns Network, a national research network of clinicians providing hospital care to term and late-preterm newborns. The survey included 22 questions evaluating practices related to hypoglycemia screening and management of asymptomatic infants.

RESULTS

Of 108 network sites, 84 (78%) responded to the survey; 100% had a hypoglycemia protocol for screening at-risk infants in the well-baby nursery. There were wide variations between sites regarding the definition of hypoglycemia (mg/dL) (<45 [24%]; <40 [23%]; <40 [0-4 hours] and <45 [4-24 hours] [27%]; <25 [0-4 hours] and <35 [4-24 hours] [8%]), timing of first glucose check (<1 hour [18%], 1-2 hours [30%], 30 minutes post feed [48%]), and threshold glucose level for treatment (<45 [19%]; <40 [18%]; <40 [0-4 hours] and <45 [4-24 hours] [20%]; <25 [0-4 hours] and <35 [4-24 hours] [15%]). All respondents used breast milk as a component of initial therapy. Criteria for admission to the NICU for hypoglycemia included the need for dextrose containing intravenous fluids (52%), persistent hypoglycemia despite treatment (49%), and hypoglycemia below a certain value (37%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant practice variation in hypoglycemia screening and management across the United States.

ABM Clinical Protocol #1: Guidelines for Glucose Monitoring and Treatment of Hypoglycemia in Term and Late Preterm Neonates, Revised 2021

A central goal of The Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine is the development of clinical protocols for managing common medical conditions that may impact breastfeeding success. These protocols serve only as guidelines for the care of breastfeeding mothers and infants and do not delineate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as standards of medical care. Variations in treatment may be appropriate according to the needs of an individual patient.

The use of intramuscular glucagon to prevent IV glucose infusion in early neonatal hypoglycemia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the success rate of intramuscular (IM) glucagon in preventing need for IV glucose and describe its glycemic effect.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 158 consecutive term neonates with feeding-resistant hypoglycemia treated with glucagon.

RESULTS

After glucagon, blood glucose (BG) increased in all but 1 infant by 25.9 ± 17.1, 42.1 ± 21.1, and 39.2 ± 28.3 mg/dL (1.4 ± 0.9, 2.3 ± 1.2, 2.2 ± 1.6 mmol/L) at 30, 60 and 120 mins respectively. In multivariable logistic regression, glucagon success was dependent upon gender (increased male risk) (P = 0.021), meeting American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) criteria for immediate IV glucose (P = 0.004), birth weight, (P = 0.018) and delta glucose concentration at 60 min (P = 0.013). After IM glucagon, 24 out of 49 infants that met AAP criteria for immediate IV glucose (49%) ended up not requiring any additional intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucagon increases BG nearly universally in hypoglycemic infants and allowed reducing the number of infants that needed immediate IV glucose infusion therapy by ≈half.