1
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Cherkin D, Rice ASC, Dworkin RH, Turk DC, McDermott MP, Bair MJ, DeBar LL, Edwards RR, Evans SR, Farrar JT, Kerns RD, Rowbotham MC, Wasan AD, Cowan P, Ferguson M, Freeman R, Gewandter JS, Gilron I, Grol-Prokopczyk H, Iyengar S, Kamp C, Karp BI, Kleykamp BA, Loeser JD, Mackey S, Malamut R, McNicol E, Patel KV, Schmader K, Simon L, Steiner DJ, Veasley C, Vollert J. Methods for pragmatic randomized clinical trials of pain therapies: IMMPACT statement. Pain 2024; 165:2165-2183. [PMID: 38723171 PMCID: PMC11404339 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pragmatic, randomized, controlled trials hold the potential to directly inform clinical decision making and health policy regarding the treatment of people experiencing pain. Pragmatic trials are designed to replicate or are embedded within routine clinical care and are increasingly valued to bridge the gap between trial research and clinical practice, especially in multidimensional conditions, such as pain and in nonpharmacological intervention research. To maximize the potential of pragmatic trials in pain research, the careful consideration of each methodological decision is required. Trials aligned with routine practice pose several challenges, such as determining and enrolling appropriate study participants, deciding on the appropriate level of flexibility in treatment delivery, integrating information on concomitant treatments and adherence, and choosing comparator conditions and outcome measures. Ensuring data quality in real-world clinical settings is another challenging goal. Furthermore, current trials in the field would benefit from analysis methods that allow for a differentiated understanding of effects across patient subgroups and improved reporting of methods and context, which is required to assess the generalizability of findings. At the same time, a range of novel methodological approaches provide opportunities for enhanced efficiency and relevance of pragmatic trials to stakeholders and clinical decision making. In this study, best-practice considerations for these and other concerns in pragmatic trials of pain treatments are offered and a number of promising solutions discussed. The basis of these recommendations was an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) meeting organized by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hohenschurz-Schmidt
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
- Research Department, University College of Osteopathy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dan Cherkin
- Osher Center for Integrative Health, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Andrew S C Rice
- Pain Research, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert H Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Dennis C Turk
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Michael P McDermott
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Matthew J Bair
- VA Center for Health Information and Communication, Regenstrief Institute, and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Lynn L DeBar
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Scott R Evans
- Biostatistics Center and the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - John T Farrar
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Robert D Kerns
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Michael C Rowbotham
- Department of Anesthesia, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Ajay D Wasan
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, and Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Penney Cowan
- American Chronic Pain Association, Rocklin, CA, United States
| | - McKenzie Ferguson
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, United States
| | - Roy Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jennifer S Gewandter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Ian Gilron
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Centre for Neuroscience Studies, and School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk
- Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | | | - Cornelia Kamp
- Center for Health and Technology (CHeT), Clinical Materials Services Unit (CMSU), University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Barbara I Karp
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Bethea A Kleykamp
- University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John D Loeser
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sean Mackey
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Neurosciences and Neurology, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Ewan McNicol
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kushang V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kenneth Schmader
- Department of Medicine-Geriatrics, Center for the Study of Aging, Duke University Medical Center, and Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Lee Simon
- SDG, LLC, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Jan Vollert
- Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Houtven CH, Smith VA, Miller KEM, Berkowitz TSZ, Shepherd-Banigan M, Hein T, Penney LS, Allen KD, Kabat M, Jobin T, Hastings SN. Comprehensive Caregiver Supports and Ascertainment and Treatment of Veteran Pain. Med Care Res Rev 2024; 81:107-121. [PMID: 38062735 DOI: 10.1177/10775587231210026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Disabled Veterans commonly experience pain. The Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) provides training, a stipend, and services to family caregivers of eligible Veterans to support their caregiving role. We compared ascertainment of veteran pain and pain treatment through health care encounters and medications (pain indicators) of participants (treated group) and non-participants (comparison group) using inverse probability treatment weights. Modeled results show that the proportion of Veterans with a pain indicator in the first year post-application was higher than that pre-application for both groups. However, the proportion of Veterans with a pain indicator was substantially higher in the treatment group: 76.1% versus 63.9% in the comparison group (p < .001). Over time, the proportion of Veterans with any pain indicator fell and group differences lessened. However, differences persisted through 8 years post-application (p < .001). PCAFC caregivers appear to help Veterans engage in pain treatment at higher rates than caregivers not in PCAFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Van Houtven
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University
| | - Katherine E M Miller
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore S Z Berkowitz
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Tyler Hein
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Lauren S Penney
- The Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, South Texas Veterans Health Care System
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret Kabat
- Office of the Secretary US Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Timothy Jobin
- Caregiver Support Program, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haun JN, Nakase-Richardson R, Cotner BA, Agtarap SD, Martin AM, Tweed A, Hanks RA, Wittine L, Bergquist TF, Hoffman JM. Stakeholder Engagement to Identify Implementation Strategies to Overcome Barriers to Delivering Chronic Pain Treatments: A NIDILRR and VA TBI Model Systems Collaborative Project. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2024; 39:E29-E40. [PMID: 38167720 PMCID: PMC10768800 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to illustrate the process of stakeholder-engaged intervention mapping approach to identify implementation strategies to overcome data-driven prioritized barriers to receiving chronic pain services for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING Community. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare providers (n = 63) with 2 or more years' experience treating persons with TBI, interviewed between October 2020 and November 2021 provided data for identification of barriers. TBI, chronic pain, and qualitative research subject matter experts (SMEs) participated in the mapping approach. DESIGN Participatory-based research design, using descriptive and intervention mapping approaches. RESULTS Four barriers to accessing chronic pain treatment by persons with TBI which emerged from provider interviews were prioritized for intervention mapping: cognitive deficits of patients (67%); patient comorbidities (63%); mental health and/or substance abuse issues (59%); and patient participation (62%). SMEs used prioritized barriers to develop 4 primary objectives and implementation strategies designed to: (1) engage consumers to validate and identify strategies; (2) tailor pain treatment and delivery to overcome barriers; (3) develop and disseminate guidelines and best practices when delivering care to persons with TBI to support spread; and (4) increase awareness, skills, and readiness of workforce to deliver pain treatment to persons with TBI. SMEs used an evidence-based approach to develop a mapping matrix of the prioritized barriers, implementation objectives, and aligned implementation strategies to impact change. CONCLUSION Implementation science is needed to facilitate knowledge translation into practice for this complex population to overcome barriers to care. Implementation strategies to address barriers to accessing chronic pain care for individuals with TBI were chosen through a participatory approach to engaging SMEs to support these rehabilitation implementation efforts. Future work includes gathering input from individuals with TBI and chronic pain and to move the intervention (implementation) mapping matrix forward to inform future implementation research, policy, and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolie N Haun
- Research Service/Polytrauma (Drs Haun and Cotner) and Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences/Polytrauma (Drs Nakase-Richardson and Martin), James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (Dr Haun); Sleep and Pulmonary Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Dr Nakase-Richardson); Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Tampa, Florida (Dr Nakase-Richardson and Ms Tweed); Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa (Dr Cotner); Research Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, Colorado (Dr Agtarap); 9Line, LLC, Tampa, Florida (Ms Tweed); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan (Dr Hanks); Medicine, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida (Dr Wittine); Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Bergquist); and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle (Dr Hoffman)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kerns RD, Davis AF, Fritz JM, Keefe FJ, Peduzzi P, Rhon DI, Taylor SL, Vining R, Yu Q, Zeliadt SB, George SZ. Intervention Fidelity in Pain Pragmatic Trials for Nonpharmacologic Pain Management: Nuanced Considerations for Determining PRECIS-2 Flexibility in Delivery and Adherence. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:568-574. [PMID: 36574858 PMCID: PMC10079571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Nonpharmacological treatments are considered first-line pain management strategies, but they remain clinically underused. For years, pain-focused pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) have generated evidence for the enhanced use of nonpharmacological interventions in routine clinical settings to help overcome implementation barriers. The Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) framework describes the degree of pragmatism across 9 key domains. Among these, "flexibility in delivery" and "flexibility in adherence," address a key goal of pragmatic research by tailoring approaches to settings in which people receive routine care. However, to maintain scientific and ethical rigor, PCTs must ensure that flexibility features do not compromise delivery of interventions as designed, such that the results are ethically and scientifically sound. Key principles of achieving this balance include clear definitions of intervention core components, intervention monitoring and documentation that is sufficient but not overly burdensome, provider training that meets the demands of delivering an intervention in real-world settings, and use of an ethical lens to recognize and avoid potential trial futility when necessary and appropriate. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents nuances to be considered when applying the PRECIS-2 framework to describe pragmatic clinical trials. Trials must ensure that patient-centered treatment flexibility does not compromise delivery of interventions as designed, such that measurement and analysis of treatment effects is reliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center of Innovation, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Alison F Davis
- Pain Management Collaboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy & Athletic Training, College of Health, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter Peduzzi
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, , New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Stephanie L Taylor
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Veterans Health Administration, Greater Los Angeles VA Health Care System, Los Angeles, California; Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
| | - Qilu Yu
- Office of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Steven B Zeliadt
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Steven Z George
- Laszlo Ormandy Distinguished Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taylor SL, Gelman HM, DeFaccio R, Douglas J, Hawrilenko MJ, McGinty NK, Resnick A, Tomlanovich NC, Toyama J, Whitehead AM, Kligler B, Zeliadt SB. We Built it, But Did They Come: Veterans' Use of VA Healthcare System-Provided Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:905-912. [PMID: 36451011 PMCID: PMC9713140 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07889-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches, such as meditation, yoga, and acupuncture, continues to grow. The evidence of effectiveness for some CIH approaches has increased in the last decade, especially for pain, with many being recommended in varying degrees in national guidelines. To offer nonpharmacological health management options and meet patient demand, the nation's largest integrated healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration (VA), greatly expanded their provision of CIH approaches recently. OBJECTIVE This paper addressed the questions of how many VA patients might use CIH approaches and chiropractic care if they were available at modest to no fee, and would patients with some health conditions or characteristics be more likely than others to use these therapies. DESIGN Using electronic medical records, we conducted a national, three-year, retrospective analysis of VA patients' use of eleven VA-covered therapies: chiropractic care, acupuncture, Battlefield Acupuncture, biofeedback, clinical hypnosis, guided imagery, massage therapy, meditation, Tai Chi/Qigong, and yoga. PARTICIPANTS We created a national cohort of veterans using VA healthcare from October 2016-September 2019. KEY RESULTS Veterans' use of these approaches increased 70% in three years. By 2019, use was 5.7% among all VA patients, but highest among patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (13.9%), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; 10.6%), depression (10.4%), anxiety (10.2%), or obesity (7.8%). The approach used varied by age and race/ethnicity, with women being uniformly more likely than men to use each approach. Patients having chronic musculoskeletal pain, obesity, anxiety, depression, or PTSD were more likely than others to use each of the approaches. CONCLUSIONS Veterans' use of some approaches rapidly grew recently and was robust, especially among patients most in need. This information might help shape federal/state health policy on the provision of evidence-based CIH approaches and guide other healthcare institutions considering providing them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie L Taylor
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Health Services Research & Development, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, MC 151, 11301 Wilshire, Bldg. 206, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA.
- Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Hannah M Gelman
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rian DeFaccio
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamie Douglas
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Matthew J Hawrilenko
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nathan K McGinty
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Adam Resnick
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Health Services Research & Development, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, MC 151, 11301 Wilshire, Bldg. 206, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Nathan C Tomlanovich
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joy Toyama
- Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Health Services Research & Development, Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, MC 151, 11301 Wilshire, Bldg. 206, 2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA
| | - Alison M Whitehead
- Integrative Health Coordinating Center, Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Benjamin Kligler
- Integrative Health Coordinating Center, Office of Patient-Centered Care and Cultural Transformation, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Steven B Zeliadt
- Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sullivan MB, Hill K, Ballengee LA, Knoblach D, Fowler C, Haun J, Saenger M. Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization. GLOBAL ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE AND HEALTH 2023; 12:27536130231209751. [PMID: 37901847 PMCID: PMC10605678 DOI: 10.1177/27536130231209751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
Background While there is recognition by the greater medical community and physical therapists to address the biopsychosocial needs of people with chronic, persistent pain, there are challenges in implementation and delivery including wide variability in interventions, lack of clear rationale, and absence of clinical models that are feasible and acceptable on a large scale. Important components for psychologically informed physical therapy (PiPT) for pain care include behavioral approaches (e.g., Acceptance and Commitment Therapy), mindfulness, pain neuroscience education, motivational interviewing (MI), and interoceptive skills-building. The Empower Veterans Program (EVP) Mindful Movement framework blends these components and emphasizes a mindfulness and self-compassion approach with MI and body-based experiential learning. This program was offered in-person at the Atlanta and Maryland VA Health Care Centers with published positive Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) pre-COVID 19 crisis and shifted to entirely remote delivery in March 2020. Objective This paper offers an evidence-based and theory driven framework to operationalize a remotely delivered group-based psychologically informed mindful movement physical therapy intervention as part of an interdisciplinary pain care program. Methods Since 2021 PRO and demographics are collected using a survey administered through Qualtrics over a 12-month period at baseline, immediately post TelePain EVP, at 6 months, and at 12 months, with findings forthcoming. Discussion/Results Tele-pain EVP offers 6-9 groups a week with 7-9 veterans from Atlanta based team and 3-4 groups a week with 5-9 veterans from Maryland based team. Adaptations for remote delivery optimized mindfulness and active learning strategies including interoceptive skills-building and use of MI to support self-efficacy to trust, restore a sense of safety in the body, and explore adaptations for safe movement. Conclusion TelePain-EVP Mindful Movement provides a framework for other programs to translate for their populations and systems to further develop best practices in PiPT for pain care and integration into interdisciplinary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlysa B. Sullivan
- TelePain-EVP National Program Coordinator EVP Mindful Movement, Atlanta VA Health Care System (AVAHCS), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kelsea Hill
- TelePain-EVP Mindful Movement, Veterans Administration Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS), Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lindsay A. Ballengee
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel Knoblach
- Veterans Administration Maryland Health Care System (VAMHCS), Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Fowler
- Research and Development Service, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jolie Haun
- Research and Development Service, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michael Saenger
- Creator of Empower Veterans Program and National Director of TelePain-EVP, Atlanta VA Health Care System (AVAHCS), Atlanta, GA, USA
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keefe FJ, Jensen MP, de C Williams AC, George SZ. The yin and yang of pragmatic clinical trials of behavioral interventions for chronic pain: balancing design features to maximize impact. Pain 2022; 163:1215-1219. [PMID: 35027519 PMCID: PMC9148368 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francis J. Keefe
- Duke Pain Prevention and Treatment Research Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Mark P. Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amanda C de C Williams
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK
| | - Steven Z. George
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ali J, Antonelli M, Bastian L, Becker W, Brandt CA, Burgess DJ, Burns A, Cohen SP, Davis AF, Dearth CL, Dziura J, Edwards R, Erdos J, Farrokhi S, Fritz J, Geda M, George SZ, Goertz C, Goodie J, Hastings SN, Heapy A, Ilfeld BM, Katsovich L, Kerns RD, Kyriakides TC, Lee A, Long CR, Luther SL, Martino S, Matheny ME, McGeary D, Midboe A, Pasquina P, Peduzzi P, Raffanello M, Rhon D, Rosen M, Esposito ER, Scarton D, Hastings SN, Seal K, Silliker N, Taylor S, Taylor SL, Tsui M, Wright FS, Zeliadt S. Optimizing the Impact of Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Veteran and Military Populations: Lessons From the Pain Management Collaboratory. Mil Med 2021; 187:179-185. [PMID: 34791412 PMCID: PMC9389906 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are well-suited to address unmet healthcare needs, such as those arising from the dual public health crises of chronic pain and opioid misuse, recently exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. These overlapping epidemics have complex, multifactorial etiologies, and PCTs can be used to investigate the effectiveness of integrated therapies that are currently available but underused. Yet individual pragmatic studies can be limited in their reach because of existing structural and cultural barriers to dissemination and implementation. The National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, and Department of Veterans Affairs formed an interagency research partnership, the Pain Management Collaboratory. The partnership combines pragmatic trial design with collaborative tools and relationship building within a large network to advance the science and impact of nonpharmacological approaches and integrated models of care for the management of pain and common co-occurring conditions. The Pain Management Collaboratory team supports 11 large-scale, multisite PCTs in veteran and military health systems with a focus on team science with the shared aim that the "whole is greater than the sum of the parts." Herein, we describe this integrated approach and lessons learned, including incentivizing all parties; proactively offering frequent opportunities for problem-solving; engaging stakeholders during all stages of research; and navigating competing research priorities. We also articulate several specific strategies and their practical implications for advancing pain management in active clinical, "real-world," settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Margaret Antonelli
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Lori Bastian
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - William Becker
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Cynthia A Brandt
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Diana J Burgess
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA,University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Amy Burns
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Clarksville, MD 21029, USA0
| | - Alison F Davis
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Christopher L Dearth
- DoD-VA Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA,Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Jim Dziura
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Rob Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
| | - Joe Erdos
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Shawn Farrokhi
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, Department of Physical Therapy, San Diego, CA 92134, USA
| | - Julie Fritz
- University of Utah, College of Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
| | - Mary Geda
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Steven Z George
- Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27715, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Goodie
- School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA,Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Alicia Heapy
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, LaJolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Lily Katsovich
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Robert D Kerns
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Tassos C Kyriakides
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Allison Lee
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, IA 52803, USA
| | - Stephen L Luther
- James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL 33612, USA,University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Steve Martino
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Michael E Matheny
- Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN 37212, USA,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
| | - Don McGeary
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Amanda Midboe
- VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Paul Pasquina
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA,Department of Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Peter Peduzzi
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Daniel Rhon
- Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA
| | - Marc Rosen
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA,Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | | | - Dylan Scarton
- Henry Jackson Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27701, USA,Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Karen Seal
- University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA,San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA
| | - Norman Silliker
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Sakasha Taylor
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Stephanie L Taylor
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA,University of California Los Angeles Department of Medicine and Department of Health Policy and Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Megan Tsui
- Henry Jackson Foundation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Fred S Wright
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
| | - Steven Zeliadt
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA,University of Washington, School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Husebo BS, Kerns RD, Han L, Skanderson M, Gnjidic D, Allore HG. Pain, Complex Chronic Conditions and Potential Inappropriate Medication in People with Dementia. Lessons Learnt for Pain Treatment Plans Utilizing Data from the Veteran Health Administration. Brain Sci 2021; 11:86. [PMID: 33440668 PMCID: PMC7827274 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), pain and chronic complex conditions (CCC) often co-occur leading to polypharmacy and with potential inappropriate medications (PIMs) use, are important risk factors for adverse drug reactions and hospitalizations in older adults. Many US veterans are at high risk for persistent pain due to age, injury or medical illness. Concerns about inadequate treatment of pain-accompanied by evidence about the analgesic efficacy of opioids-has led to an increase in the use of opioid medications to treat chronic pain in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and other healthcare systems. This study aims to investigate the relationship between receipt of pain medications and centrally (CNS) acting PIMs among veterans diagnosed with dementia, pain intensity, and CCC 90-days prior to hospitalization. The final analytic sample included 96,224 (81.7%) eligible older veterans from outpatient visits between October 2012-30 September 2013. We hypothesized that veterans with ADRD, and severe pain intensity may receive inappropriate pain management and CNS-acting PIMs. Seventy percent of the veterans, and especially people with ADRD, reported severe pain intensity. One in three veterans with ADRD and severe pain intensity have an increased likelihood for CNS-acting PIMs, and/or opioids. Regular assessment and re-assessment of pain among older persons with CCC, patient-centered tapering or discontinuation of opioids, alternatives to CNS-acting PIMs, and use of non-pharmacological approaches should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina S. Husebo
- Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway
- Municipality of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway
| | - Robert D. Kerns
- Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology and Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA;
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA;
| | - Ling Han
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; (L.H.); (H.G.A.)
| | - Melissa Skanderson
- Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT 06516, USA;
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006 NSW, Australia;
| | - Heather G. Allore
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; (L.H.); (H.G.A.)
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|