1
|
Perrin N, Guillaume D, Bloom T, Alexander K, Olawole W, Clough A, Turner R, Glass N. Dating Violence Victimization, Perpetration and Suicidality Among Adolescents. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs 2024; 47:170-182. [PMID: 39052900 DOI: 10.1080/24694193.2024.2377205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Few studies have focused on evaluating the relationship between dating violence (DV) and suicide during the critical period of adolescence, particularly for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth. The study examined the relationship between experiencing DV victimization and perpetration in the past 6 months and suicidality (ideation and attempts) among male, female, and TGD adolescents. This study used data from a longitudinal randomized trial examining the effectiveness of myPlan, a healthy relationship and safety planning app intervention for adolescents, to a control website. Data for this study was collected virtually, in which participants completed surveys through online platforms. A convenience sample was recruited through youth organizations and posting on online platforms including social media. N = 610 adolescents age 15-17 years, who resided in the U.S. experienced DV in the past 6 months, had access to a safe device, and were able to access online surveys were included in this study. The majority were female (63.8%) with (19.5%) TGD and 16.7% male. Nearly 22% of the sample identified as Hispanic/Latino and 61.0% as white. Participants completed an online survey consisting of measures of socio demographics, DV victimization and perpetration via the Conflict of Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI), and suicidality. The primary outcome was the association between DV victimization and perpetration on suicidality. Different forms of DV were accounted for including emotional/relational, physical, and sexual DV. Logistic regressions determined differences in the rate of DV victimization and perpetration on suicidality between gender groups (cisgender female, cisgender male, and TGD). A stratified analysis was conducted to test if the relationship between DV and suicidality differed across gender identity. Approximately one-third (32.2%) of adolescents reported suicidality in the past 6 months. TGD adolescents were more likely to report suicidality compared to males (20.6%, p < .05) and females (32.7%, p > .05). The overall odds of suicidality increased as frequency of emotional/relational DV victimization (OR = 1.37, p < .001), physical DV victimization (OR = 1.59, p < .001) and sexual DV victimization (OR = 1.42, p < .001) increased. These relationships were not significant for DV perpetration. When stratifying findings by gender groups, all forms of DV victimization significantly increased the odds of suicidality for females as well as female perpetration of physical violence. For males, all forms of DV victimization and perpetration were associated with increased odds of suicidality, although not significant due to the smaller sample size. While DV victimization is associated with increased odds of suicidality for TGD, perpetration of DV is associated with decreased odds of suicidality, although not significant due to small sample size. The findings from this study provide further insight into experiences of DV and suicidality among gender diverse youth and can guide future interventions aimed at preventing DV and suicide among adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Perrin
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Tina Bloom
- College of Nursing, Notre Dame of Maryland University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kamila Alexander
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Wuraola Olawole
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amber Clough
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rachael Turner
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nancy Glass
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Melendez-Torres GJ, Orr N, Farmer C, Shaw N, Chollet A, Rizzo AJ, Kiff F, Rigby E, Hagell A, Priolo Filho SR, Taylor B, Young H, Bonell C, Berry V. School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-192. [PMID: 38421001 DOI: 10.3310/ktwr6997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Schools have a duty of care to prevent violence between students but a significant amount of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence occurs in schools. These are important public health issues with important longitudinal consequences for young people. Objectives To understand functioning and effectiveness of school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence. Review methods We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review to synthesise different types of evidence relating to school-based interventions for the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence to understand if, how and in what ways these interventions are effective. We searched 21 databases and 2 trial registers and undertook forwards and backwards citation chasing, author contact and other supplementary search methods. Searches identified all literature published to June 2021. All screening was undertaken in duplicate and independently, and we quality appraised all included studies. Results We included 247 reports (68 outcome evaluations, 137 process evaluations). Synthesis of intervention components produced an intervention typology: single-component, curricular, multicomponent, and multilevel programmes. Synthesis of intervention theories suggested that interventions aiming to increase students' sense of school belonging and sense of safety in the school building could encourage increased learning of prosocial skills and increased prosocial peer norms, and so potentially reducing dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence. Synthesis of factors affecting delivery highlighted school organisation and leaders who believed in the importance of addressing dating and relationship violence/gender-based violence, along with time and resources to deliver the interventions. The ease with which the intervention could be delivered and modified was also important. Meta-analysis found stronger evidence for intervention effectiveness in reducing dating and relationship violence than for gender-based violence, with significant long-term impacts on dating and relationship violence victimisation and perpetration, and some evidence that interventions in high-income countries could be effective for reducing victimisation and perpetration of gender-based violence in the long-term. Impacts on knowledge and attitudes were primarily short-term. Network meta-analysis did not suggest superiority of any intervention type. Moderation evidence suggested interventions reduced dating and relationship violence perpetration in boys more than girls, but reduced gender-based violence perpetration more in girls. Metaregression by intervention component did not explain heterogeneity in effectiveness, but qualitative comparative analysis suggested that reducing perpetration was important to reducing victimisation, and that perpetration could be reduced via focus on interpersonal skills, guided practice and (for gender-based violence) implementation of social structural components. Limitations Despite an exhaustive search, trials may have been missed and risk of publication bias was high for several analyses. Conclusions This is the most comprehensive systematic review of school-based interventions for dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence to date. It is clear that the prevention of dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence in schools will require longer-term investment to show benefit. Future work Future research is needed to understand why intervention effectiveness appears stronger for dating and relationship violence than gender-based violence. Study registration The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020190463. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130144) and is published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 12, No. 3. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noreen Orr
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Caroline Farmer
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Naomi Shaw
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Annah Chollet
- Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew J Rizzo
- College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Fraizer Kiff
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Emma Rigby
- Association for Young People's Health, London, UK
| | - Ann Hagell
- Association for Young People's Health, London, UK
| | | | - Bruce Taylor
- National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Honor Young
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Bonell
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Farmer C, Shaw N, Rizzo AJ, Orr N, Chollet A, Hagell A, Rigby E, Young H, Berry V, Bonell C, Melendez-Torres GJ. School-Based Interventions to Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Am J Public Health 2023; 113:320-330. [PMID: 36791352 PMCID: PMC9932388 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.307153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Background. Schools are sites of dating and relationship violence (DRV) and of gender-based violence (GBV) victimization and perpetration. School-based interventions can reach a broad range of students, targeting both individual and group processes that may underpin DRV and GBV. Considering DRV and GBV jointly is important because of their shared etiologies. Comparing the effectiveness of interventions using network meta-analysis (NMA) can support decision-making on optimal resource use. Objectives. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of school-based interventions for children aged 5 to 18 years on DRV and GBV victimization, perpetration, and related mediators. Search Methods. We searched 21 databases in July 2020 and June 2021, alongside extensive supplementary search methods, including gray literature searches, forward and backward citation chasing, and searches on first and last author names. Selection Criteria. We included randomized-controlled trials of interventions for children of compulsory school age implemented within the school setting, and either partially or wholly aimed at changing DRV or GBV outcomes. Data Collection and Analysis. Pairwise meta-analyses using random-effects robust variance estimation considered intervention effectiveness on DRV and GBV victimization and perpetration using odds ratios, and on mediators (e.g., knowledge and attitudes) using standardized mean differences. Effects were divided into short-term (< 12 months postbaseline) and long-term (≥ 12 months postbaseline). NMAs on victimization and perpetration outcomes compared interventions categorized by breadth of mechanism and complexity of delivery and implementation. Meta-regression tested sensitivity to percentage of girls in the trial sample and country context. Main Results. Our analysis included 68 trials. Evidence was stronger overall for effects on DRV than for GBV, with significant long-term impacts on DRV victimization (odds ratio [OR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68, 0.99) and DRV perpetration (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.64, 0.94). Knowledge and attitudinal effects were predominantly short-term (e.g., for DRV-related violence acceptance, d = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.08, 0.24). NMAs did not suggest the superiority of any intervention type; however, most analyses for GBV outcomes were inconsistent. A higher proportion of girls in the sample was associated with increased effectiveness on long-term victimization outcomes. Author's Conclusions. Evidence is stronger for DRV than for GBV, despite considerable heterogeneity. Certainty of findings was low or very low overall. Public Health Implications. Violence reductions may require more than 1 school year to become apparent. More extensive interventions may not be more effective. A possible reason for stronger effectiveness for DRV is that whereas GBV is ingrained in school cultures and practices, DRV is potentially more open to change via addressing individual knowledge and attitudes. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(3):320-330. https://doi.org/10.2105/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307153).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Farmer
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Naomi Shaw
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Rizzo
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Noreen Orr
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Annah Chollet
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ann Hagell
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Emma Rigby
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Honor Young
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Vashti Berry
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris Bonell
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - G J Melendez-Torres
- Caroline Farmer, Naomi Shaw, Noreen Orr, Vashti Berry, and G. J. Melendez-Torres are with the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. Andrew J. Rizzo is with the College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville. Annah Chollet is with the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Ann Hagell and Emma Rigby are with the Association for Young People's Health, London, UK. Honor Young is with the Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. Chris Bonell is with the Department of Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herbert A, Fraser A, Howe LD, Szilassy E, Barnes M, Feder G, Barter C, Heron J. Categories of Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse Among Young Women and Men: Latent Class Analysis of Psychological, Physical, and Sexual Victimization and Perpetration in a UK Birth Cohort. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 2023; 38:NP931-NP954. [PMID: 35471986 PMCID: PMC9727413 DOI: 10.1177/08862605221087708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, around one-third of young people are exposed to Intimate Partner Violence and Abuse (IPVA) by 21 years old. However, types of IPVA victimization in this population (psychological, physical, sexual), and their relationship with impact and perpetration are poorly understood. METHODS Participants in a UK birth cohort reported IPVA victimization and perpetration by age 21. We carried out a latent class analysis, where we categorized IPVA by types/frequency of victimization, and then assigned individuals to their most probable class. Within these classes, we then estimated rates of reported: 1) types of negative impacts (sad, upset/unhappy, anxious, depressed, affected work/studies, angry/annoyed, drank/took drugs more); 2) types/frequency of perpetration. RESULTS Among 2130 women and 1149 men, 32% and 24% reported IPVA victimization (of which 89% and 73% reported negative impact); 21% and 16% perpetration. Victimization responses were well represented by five classes, including three apparent in both sexes: No-low victimization (characterized by low probabilities of all types of victimization; average probabilities of women and men belonging to this class were 82% and 70%); Mainly psychological (15% and 12%); Psychological and physical victimization (4% and 7%), and two classes that were specific to women: Psychological and sexual (7%); Multi-victimization (frequent victimization for all three types; 4%). In women, all types of negative impact were most common in the Psychological and sexual and Multi-victimization classes; for men, the Psychological and physical class. In women, all types of perpetration were most common for the Mainly psychological, Psychological and physical and Multi-victimization classes; in men, the Mainly psychological and Psychological and physical classes. DISCUSSION In this study of young people, we found categories of co-occurrence of types and frequency of IPVA victimization associated with differential rates of negative impact and perpetrating IPVA. This is consistent with emerging evidence of IPVA differentiation and its variable impact in other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Herbert
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abigail Fraser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura D. Howe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Barter
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kiff F, Shaw N, Orr N, Rizzo AJ, Chollet A, Young H, Rigby E, Hagell A, Berry V, Bonell C, Melendez-Torres GJ, Farmer C. Systematic Review of the Economics of School-Based Interventions for Dating Violence and Gender-Based Violence. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2022; 50:339-346. [PMID: 36503294 PMCID: PMC10164611 DOI: 10.1177/10901981221138064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Dating and relationship violence (DRV) and gender-based violence (GBV) among children and young people incur a high cost to individuals and society. School-based interventions present an opportunity to prevent DRV and GBV early in individuals’ lives. However, with school resources under pressure, policymakers require guidance on the economics of implementing interventions. As part of a large systematic review funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), we searched for economic evaluations and costing studies of school-based interventions for DRV and GBV. No formal economic evaluations were identified. Seven studies reporting costs, cost savings, or resource use for eight interventions were identified. The largest costs of implementing interventions were related to staff training and salaries but savings could be made by implementing interventions on a large scale. The potential cost savings of avoided DRV and GBV far outweighed the costs of implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Emma Rigby
- Association for Young People’s Health, London, UK
| | - Ann Hagell
- Association for Young People’s Health, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Bonell
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Orr N, Chollet A, Rizzo AJ, Shaw N, Farmer C, Young H, Rigby E, Berry V, Bonell C, Melendez‐Torres GJ. School-based interventions for preventing dating and relationship violence and gender-based violence: A systematic review and synthesis of theories of change. REVIEW OF EDUCATION (BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION) 2022; 10:e3382. [PMID: 37090159 PMCID: PMC10116865 DOI: 10.1002/rev3.3382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
School-based interventions for preventing dating and relationship violence (DRV) and gender-based violence (GBV) are an important way of attempting to prevent and reduce the significant amount of DRV and GBV that occurs in schools. A theoretical understanding of how these interventions are likely to cause change is essential for developing and evaluating effectiveness, so developing an overarching theory of change for school-based interventions to prevent DRV and GBV was the first step in our systematic review. Theoretical data were synthesised from 68 outcome evaluations using methods common to qualitative synthesis. Specifically, we used a meta-ethnographic approach to develop a line-of-argument for an overarching theory of change and Markham and Aveyard's (2003, Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1209) theory of human functioning and school organisation as a framework for structuring the concepts. The overall theory of change generated was that by strengthening relationships between and among staff and students, between the classroom and the wider school, and between schools and communities, and by increasing students' sense of belonging with student-centred learning opportunities, schools would encourage student commitment to the school and its values, prosocial behaviour and avoidance of violence and aggression. The theory of human functioning informed our understanding of the mechanisms of action but from our analysis we found that it required refinement to address the importance of context and student agency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noreen Orr
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterExeterUK
| | | | - Andrew J. Rizzo
- College of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Naomi Shaw
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Caroline Farmer
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Honor Young
- School of Social SciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Emma Rigby
- Association for Young People's HealthLondonUK
| | - Vashti Berry
- University of Exeter Medical School, University of ExeterExeterUK
| | - Chris Bonell
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barnes M, Szilassy E, Herbert A, Heron J, Feder G, Fraser A, Howe LD, Barter C. Being silenced, loneliness and being heard: understanding pathways to intimate partner violence & abuse in young adults. a mixed-methods study. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1562. [PMID: 35974354 PMCID: PMC9381391 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13990-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International research shows the significance and impact of intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) as a public health issue for young adults. There is a lack of qualitative research exploring pathways to IPVA. METHODS The current mixed-methods study used qualitative interviews and analysis of longitudinal cohort data, to explore experiences of pathways to IPVA. Semi-structured Interviews alongside Life History Calendars were undertaken to explore 17 young women's (19-25 years) experiences and perceptions of pathways to IPVA in their relationships. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Based on themes identified in the qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis was conducted in data from 2127 female and 1145 male participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort study. We fitted regression models to assess the association of child maltreatment, parental domestic violence, and peer-to-peer victimisation, by age 12, with loneliness during adolescence (ages 13-14), and the association of loneliness during adolescence with IPVA (age 18-21). Mediation analysis estimated the direct effects of maltreatment on IPVA, and indirect effects through loneliness. FINDINGS All women interviewed experienced at least one type of maltreatment, parental domestic violence, or bullying during childhood. Nearly all experienced IPVA and most had been multi-victimised. Findings indicated a circular pathway: early trauma led to isolation and loneliness, negative labelling and being silenced through negative responses to help seeking, leading to increased experiences of loneliness and intensifying vulnerability to further violence and abuse in young adulthood. The pathway was compounded by intersectionality. Potential ways to break this cycle of loneliness included being heard and supported, especially by teachers. Quantitative analysis confirmed an association between child maltreatment and loneliness in adolescence, and an association between loneliness in adolescence and experience of IPVA in young adult relationships. CONCLUSION It is likely that negative labelling and loneliness mediate pathways to IPVA, especially among more disadvantaged young women. The impact of early maltreatment on young people's wellbeing and own relationships is compounded by disadvantage, disability and ethnicity. Participants' resilience was enabled by support in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Annie Herbert
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Abigail Fraser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Laura D Howe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Couturiaux DVR, Young H, Anthony RE, Page N, Lowthian E, Melendez-Torres GJ, Hewitt G, Moore GF. Risk Behaviours Associated with Dating and Relationship Violence among 11-16 Year Olds in Wales: Results from the 2019 Student Health and Wellbeing Survey. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18031192. [PMID: 33572756 PMCID: PMC7908341 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
(1) Background: This study examines the associations between risk behaviours and adolescent emotional and physical dating and relationship violence (DRV) victimisation and perpetration, and how these vary by gender. The risk behaviours explored include bullying, cyberbullying, sexting, alcohol, and cannabis use; (2) Methods: Cross-sectional self-report data from the School Health Research Network (SHRN) 2019 Student Health Wellbeing (SHW) survey of 48,397 students aged 11–16 from 149 schools across Wales were analysed using single and multiple-behaviour logistic regression models to explore the associations between each risk behaviour and emotional and physical DRV victimisation and perpetration; (3) Results: Bivariate analyses revealed a statistically significant association between DRV and all risk behaviours. In multivariate analyses, students who reported bullying, cyberbullying, sexting, and substance use, compared to those that had not, had significantly higher odds of experiencing and perpetrating emotional and physical DRV; and (4) Conclusions: Future studies on DRV should consider a mixed-methods approach to explore the context in which DRV and risk behaviours interrelate. Results from this study indicate the possibility that prevention and intervention programmes in school settings that seek to develop healthy school environments and peer-to-peer relationships, could inadvertently reduce the occurrence of future DRV and associated risk behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle V. R. Couturiaux
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
- Correspondence: (D.V.R.C.); (R.E.A.)
| | - Honor Young
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
| | - Rebecca E. Anthony
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
- Correspondence: (D.V.R.C.); (R.E.A.)
| | - Nicholas Page
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
| | - Emily Lowthian
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
| | - G. J. Melendez-Torres
- College of Medicine and Health, South Cloisters, St Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK;
| | - Gillian Hewitt
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
| | - Graham F. Moore
- Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 1–3 Museum Place, Cardiff CF10 3BD, UK; (H.Y.); (N.P.); (E.L.); (G.H.); (G.F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herbert A, Heron J, Barter C, Szilassy E, Barnes M, Howe LD, Feder G, Fraser A. Risk factors for intimate partner violence and abuse among adolescents and young adults: findings from a UK population-based cohort. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 5:176. [PMID: 33553678 PMCID: PMC7848855 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16106.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Approximately one-third of young people in the UK have suffered intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on reaching adulthood. We need interventions to prevent IPVA in this population, but there is a lack of evidence on who is at greatest risk. Methods: We analysed questionnaire data from 3,279 participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children population-based birth cohort. We estimated the prevalence of IPVA victimisation and perpetration by age 21, by sex, demographic, parenting, mental health, externalising behaviour (e.g. smoking), educational, employment, and adverse childhood factors. Results: Overall, 29% of males and 41% of females reported IPVA victimisation, with 20% and 25% reporting perpetration, respectively (16% and 22% both). The most common type of IPVA was emotional, followed by physical, then sexual. History of anxiety, self-harm, anti-social behaviour, cannabis or illicit (non-cannabis) drug use, or risky sexual behaviour among males and females were associated with a 50% increase in likelihood of IPVA (victimisation or perpetration). Males reporting depression, sexual abuse (not by an intimate partner), witnessing domestic violence, or parental separation were also more likely to experience IPVA. Extreme parental monitoring, high academic achievement during adolescence, and NEET (not being in education, employment, or training) status in young adulthood were associated with reduced risks of IPVA. Conclusions: A range of demographic, mental health, and behavioural factors were associated with increased prevalence of IPVA victimisation or perpetration. Further study of likely complex pathways from these factors to IPVA, to inform primary prevention, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Herbert
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Barter
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura D Howe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abigail Fraser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Herbert A, Heron J, Barter C, Szilassy E, Barnes M, Howe LD, Feder G, Fraser A. Risk factors for intimate partner violence and abuse among adolescents and young adults: findings from a UK population-based cohort. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5:176. [PMID: 33553678 PMCID: PMC7848855 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16106.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Approximately one-third of young people in the UK have suffered intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on reaching adulthood. We need interventions to prevent IPVA in this population, but there is a lack of evidence on who is at greatest risk. Methods: We analysed questionnaire data from 3,279 participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children population-based birth cohort. We estimated the prevalence of IPVA victimisation and perpetration by age 21, by sex, demographic, parenting, mental health, externalising behaviour (e.g. smoking), educational, employment, and adverse childhood factors. Results: Overall, 29% of males and 41% of females reported IPVA victimisation, with 20% and 25% reporting perpetration, respectively (16% and 22% both). The most common sub-type was emotional, followed by physical, then sexual. History of self-harm, anti-social behaviour, cannabis or illicit (non-cannabis) drug use among males and females were associated with a two-fold increase in likelihood of IPVA (victimisation or perpetration). Males reporting risky sexual behaviour, sexual abuse (not by an intimate partner), or witnessing domestic violence, and females reporting sexual minority status in adolescence were also twice as likely to experience IPVA. Extreme parental monitoring during adolescence was associated with a reduced risk of IPVA in males and females, as was high academic achievement, and NEET (not being in education, employment, or training) status for young adult men. Conclusions: A range of demographic, mental health, and behavioural factors were associated with increased prevalence of IPVA victimisation or perpetration. Further study of likely complex pathways from these factors to IPVA, to inform primary prevention, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Herbert
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Barter
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura D. Howe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abigail Fraser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herbert A, Heron J, Barter C, Szilassy E, Barnes M, Howe LD, Feder G, Fraser A. Risk factors for intimate partner violence and abuse among adolescents and young adults: findings from a UK population-based cohort. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5:176. [PMID: 33553678 PMCID: PMC7848855 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16106.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Approximately one-third of young people in the UK have suffered intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on reaching adulthood. We need interventions to prevent IPVA in this population, but there is a lack of evidence on who is at greatest risk. Methods: We analysed questionnaire data from 3,279 participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children population-based birth cohort. We estimated the prevalence of IPVA victimisation and perpetration by age 21, by sex, demographic, parenting, mental health, externalising behaviour (e.g. smoking), educational, employment, and adverse childhood factors. Results: Overall, 29% of males and 41% of females reported IPVA victimisation, with 20% and 25% reporting perpetration, respectively (16% and 22% both). The most common sub-type was emotional, followed by physical, then sexual. History of self-harm, anti-social behaviour, cannabis or illicit (non-cannabis) drug use among boys and girls was associated with a two-fold increase in likelihood of IPVA (victimisation or perpetration). Males reporting risky sexual behaviour, sexual abuse (not by an intimate partner), or witnessing domestic violence, and females reporting sexual minority status in adolescence were also twice as likely to experience IPVA. Extreme parental monitoring during adolescence was associated with a reduced risk of IPVA in males and females, as was not being in education, employment, or training for young adult men. Conclusions: A range of demographic, mental health, and behavioural factors were associated with increased prevalence of IPVA victimisation or perpetration. Further study of likely complex pathways from these factors to IPVA, to inform primary prevention, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Herbert
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jon Heron
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Christine Barter
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Eszter Szilassy
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Maria Barnes
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura D. Howe
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gene Feder
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Abigail Fraser
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|