Churg-Strauss syndrome associated with montelukast therapy

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and its association with montelukast: a case-based review

The association between the use of certain medications (including sulfonamides, hydralazine, and procainamide) and the occurrence of drug-induced lupus or hepatitis is well established. More recently, cases of immune-related adverse events ranging from inflammatory polyarthritis to necrotizing myositis in patients taking checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. However, data linking drugs to systemic vasculitis are scarce and at times debatable. Propylthiouracil, hydralazine, and minocycline have been associated with rare cases of ANCA-associated syndromes, including life-threatening pulmonary-renal syndromes and systemic polyarteritis nodosa-like diseases. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) has been reported in patients taking leukotriene inhibitors. Since the link between the use of leukotriene inhibitors and occurrence of EGPA remains highly controversial, we performed a literature review for cases of EGPA in patients taking montelukast without prior history of oral corticosteroid use. We found 24 cases, along with our own two cases described, making 26 cases in total. The mean age was 43 and a majority (18/26) were female. In majority of cases EGPA-like disease never relapsed after they were taken off leukotriene inhibitors suggesting a clear causal relationship between the use of these drugs and occurrence of eosinophil-rich systemic EGPA.

The leukotriene receptor antagonist Montelukast can induce adverse skin reactions in asthmatic patients

Montelukast the leukotriene receptor antagonist is an anti-inflammatory drug that causes bronchodilation and for this reason it is used to improve inflammatory states in asthma and allergic rhinitis. Montelukast is generally considered a safe drug with the occurrence of a few adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and anti-leucotrienes are usually well-tolerated by adults and young patients. Starting from these premises the purpose of this review is so give un up-to-date scenario about skin adverse reactions due to Montelukast administration. Only few cases were reported during last years, however interestingly some recent reports let us enlarging our ADR data about Montelukast. We decided to divide the paragraph into sections evaluating the following skin lesions: vasculitic lesions, rash, urticaria and angioedema. As described in the results, CSS were the most frequent cases reported, belonging to the Vasculitis category. We speculated several mechanisms leading to the spread of the skin reactions. Montelukast still remains a safe drug used for the treatment of severe and moderate asthma. However, for some reasons still in course of analysis, in rare cases patients could develop ADR. Among these, about half of the patients show skin signs as rash, vescicles, bullous skin, purpura, maculopapular cutis, erythematous exanthema, urticaria and angioedema. Most of these symptoms are a consequence of the onset of a vasculitis as CSS and allergic granulomatous angiitis. In many cases the onset of the reactions happen within the first months of intake. For this reason, the prescribing physicians should be alert for signs, symptoms and genetic predisposition of these skin diseases.

Montelukast-induced adverse drug reactions: a review of case reports in the literature

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a leucotriene receptor antagonist, binds the cysteinyl leucotriene type 1 receptor. Montelukast is commonly prescribed to asthma patients as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids. Several clinical trials emphasized that montelukast can be considered a safe drug. However, recent evidence reconsidered the benefit/risk ratio of the use of montelukast for both paediatric and adult patients.

SUMMARY

The present review analyzed the previous published case reports regarding montelukast-induced adverse drug reactions (ADRs). They included agitation, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, hallucinations, suicidal thinking and suicidality, tremor, dizziness, drowsiness, neuropathies and seizures. The immune system can be involved, in particular, cases of Churg-Strauss syndrome have been published. Furthermore, it can induce hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis and eosinophilic infiltration. In addition, hepatobiliary, pancreatic and uropoietic disorders have been observed. Some of these cases are characterized by severe prognosis (i.e. neurological deficit and fatal hepatotoxicity). Key Message: The use of montelukast can be burdened by several ADRs, of which physicians should be aware in their clinical practice. A better understanding of the mechanisms causing ADRs after using montelukast could help researchers and clinicians in defining a risk-reduction strategy aimed to lessen montelukast toxicity. More accurate epidemiological studies, in order to discover risk factors favouring montelukast-associated ADRs, are demanded.

A case of Churg-Strauss syndrome treated with montelukast

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of Churg-Strauss syndrome who had asthma and allergic rhinitis treated with montelukast.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND INTERVENTION

A nonsmoking 59-year-old woman presented with fever, hemoptysis and dyspnea. Past medical history included allergic rhinitis and asthma which were diagnosed 18 years ago. The asthma was treated successfully with inhaled salmeterol and beclamethasone. She also received montelukast (10 mg/day) for 3 years. Although her chest X-ray was normal a week earlier, she had widespread bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on admission. She had leukocytosis (12.5 × 10(9)/l) with eosinophilia (15.6%). Her total IgE count was 550 U/ml. Testing for protoplasmic-staining antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies was positive. Bronchoalveolar lavage could not be performed due to bronchospasm and severe hypoxemia; however, mucosal biopsies were obtained, which revealed eosinophil leukocytes in the lumen and walls of small vessels. She was diagnosed to have Churg-Strauss syndrome and had remarkable clinical improvement on day 5 with high-dose of oral prednisolone (50 mg/day). Radiological improvement was detected at the end of the second week.

CONCLUSION

This case shows the importance of being aware that leukotriene receptor antagonists could cause Churg-Strauss syndrome, in spite of the uncertainty about its mechanism.

Churg-Strauss syndrome successfully treated with rituximab

Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) is characterized by small-vessel vasculitis, extravascular granulomatous inflammation, and massive eosinophilia in tissues and blood, and is often accompanied by a history of preclinical asthma and/or allergic rhinitis lasting several years before the syndrome develops its full clinical picture. Corticosteroids, often in combination with cytotoxic agents, comprise standard therapy; however, a number of patients appear to be resistant to treatment and there is a need for more effective regimens. B cell depletion may be an effective treatment option for CSS. Here, we describe two patients resistant to conventional therapy who were treated with rituximab and experienced a rapid and substantial decrease in disease activity and asthmatic symptoms and an increase in physical capacity.