Proteinuria as a predictor of renal functional outcome after revascularization in atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD)

Improving outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease: importance of clinical presentation and multi-disciplinary review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis may cause hypertension, chronic kidney disease and heart failure, but large randomized control trials to date have shown no major additional benefit of renal revascularization over optimal medical management. However, these trials did not consider outcomes specifically in relation to clinical presentations. Given that atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is a heterogenous condition, measures of success likely differ according to the clinical presentation. Our retrospective study objectives were to determine the effects of revascularization when applied to specific clinical presentations and after careful multi-disciplinary team review.

METHODS

All patients presenting to our centre and its referring hospitals with radiological findings of at least one renal artery stenosis > 50% between January 2015 and January 2020 were reviewed at the renovascular multi-disciplinary team meeting with revascularization considered in accordance with international guidelines, notably for patients with anatomically significant renal artery stenosis, adequately sized kidney and presentations with any of; deteriorating kidney function, heart failure syndrome, or uncontrollable hypertension. Optimal medical management was recommended for all patients which included lipid lowering agents, anti-platelets and anti-hypertensives targeting blood pressure ≤ 130/80 mmHg. The effect of revascularization was assessed according to the clinical presentation; blood pressure and number of agents in those with renovascular hypertension, delta glomerular filtration rate in those with ischaemic nephropathy and heart failure re-admissions in those with heart failure syndromes.

RESULTS

During this 5-year period, 127 patients with stenosis ≥ 50% were considered by the multidisciplinary team, with 57 undergoing revascularization (17 primarily for severe hypertension, 25 deteriorating kidney function, 6 heart failure syndrome and 9 for very severe anatomical stenosis). Seventy-nine percent of all revascularized patients had a positive outcome specific to their clinical presentation, with 82% of those with severe hypertension improving blood pressure control, 72% with progressive ischaemic nephropathy having attenuated GFR decline, and no further heart failure admissions in those with heart failure. Seventy-eight percent of patients revascularized for high grade stenosis alone had better blood pressure control with 55% also manifesting renal functional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Multi-disciplinary team discussion successfully identified a group of patients more likely to benefit from revascularization based on 3 key factors: clinical presentation, severity of the renal artery lesion and the state of the kidney beyond the stenotic lesion. In this way, a large proportion of patients can clinically improve after revascularization if their outcomes are considered according to the nature of their clinical presentation.

Gray-Scale, Color Doppler, Spectral Doppler, and Contrast-Enhanced Renal Artery Ultrasound: Imaging Techniques and Features

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is increasingly being detected in elderly patients as life expectancy increases. RAS induces hypertension or reduces renal function. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography are objective in detecting RAS but may cause iodine-induced nephrotoxicity or nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with RAS. Ultrasound (US) is, by contrast, a noninvasive and real-time imaging modality useful in patients with reduced renal function. Renal US is not as sensitive for detecting RAS because this technique indirectly assesses the renal artery by analyzing intrarenal hemodynamic changes. Although, ideally, US would be used to directly evaluate the renal artery, its current utility for RAS detection remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to introduce how to assess renal artery with US, to describe imaging features of renal artery US, to compare renal artery US and renal US, and to show how to perform work-up in patients in whom RAS is suspected.

The importance of proteinuria and prior cardiovascular disease in all major clinical outcomes of atherosclerotic renovascular disease - a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Identification of patients at risk of developing adverse events would enable aggressive medical therapy and possibly targeted revascularization. The aim of this study is to characterize the determinants of long-term outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD).

METHODS

Patients with a radiological diagnosis of ARVD were recruited into this single-center prospective cohort study between 1986 and 2014. Data collected included baseline co-morbid conditions, annualized prescribed medications and laboratory data (serum creatinine [υmol/L], proteinuria [g/24 h]). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to explore association with these end-points: death, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), cardiovascular event (CVE) and the first of any of these events.

RESULTS

A total of 872 patients were recruited into this study. However, 42 patients were excluded due to missing baseline data and hence case records for 830 patients were reviewed. Over median follow-up of 57.1 months (interquartile range: 21.7-96.9), incidence per 100 patient years of death, ESKD, CVE and any event was 13.5, 4.2, 8.9 and 21.0 respectively. Macrovascular disease (MVD), congestive heart failure (CHF), flash pulmonary oedema (FPE) and greater proteinuria at baseline were individually associated with increased risk for all end-points in multivariable analysis (Death: MVD -HR 1.24 [95% CI 1.02-1.50]; CHF -HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.08-1.64]; FPE - HR 2.10 [95% CI 1.50-2.92]; proteinuria - HR 1.14 [95% CI 1.08-1.20]). Higher estimated glomerular filtration rate at time of diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced risk of all end-points (Death: HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.89-0.94])., Administration of statins and renin angiotensin blockade (RAB) at baseline were also associated with reduced adverse events, especially death (RAB: HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.70-0.98]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-.94]) and ESKD (RAB: HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.71-1.00]; statins: HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.93]). Revascularization was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.83]) and ESKD (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76]).

CONCLUSION

All patients with ARVD require intensive vascular protection therapy to help mitigate systemic atherosclerosis, optimize cardiovascular risk and improve clinical outcomes. More effort is required to identify the minority of patients who may benefit from revascularization.

Mortality and Renal Replacement Therapy after Renal Artery Stent Placement for Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for progression to renal replacement therapy (RRT) and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent renal artery (RA) stent placement for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study from June 1996 to June 2009 identified 1,052 patients who underwent RA stent placement. Glomerular filtration rate at time of RA stent placement was estimated from serum creatinine level and divided into chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-5. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine which factors were associated with each endpoint.

RESULTS

Times to progression to all-cause mortality and RRT were similar for CKD stages 1/2/3A and served as the reference group. In multivariable analysis, high-grade proteinuria (P < .001) and higher CKD stage (5 vs 1/2/3A [P < .001], 4 vs 1/2/3A [P < .001], 3B vs 1/2/3A [P = .02]) remained independently associated with increased risk of progression to RRT. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) use was associated with decreased risk of progression to RRT (P = .03). Higher CKD stage (5 vs 1/2/3A [P < .001], 4 vs 1/2/3A [P = .004]), carotid artery disease (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P = .002), and high-grade proteinuria (P < .001) remained independently associated with all-cause mortality. Statin use was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with atherosclerotic RAS who undergo RA stent placement and have high-grade proteinuria and CKD stage 3B/4/5 have increased risk of progression to RRT. Patients with high-grade proteinuria, CKD stage 3B/4/5, carotid artery disease, or diabetes have increased risk for all-cause mortality after renal artery stent placement. Patients receiving ACEI/ARBs have a decreased risk of progression to RRT, and patients receiving statins have a decreased risk of all-cause mortality.

Associations of antiplatelet therapy and beta blockade with patient outcomes in atherosclerotic renovascular disease

Randomized trials have shown a neutral effect of percutaneous revascularization compared with optimal medical therapy in patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD). However, there are few data to define what constitutes optimal medical therapy. We present a retrospective analysis of 529 ARVD patients. Separate analyses were performed comparing outcomes in patients prescribed/not prescribed beta blocker and antiplatelet agents. Analyses were adjusted for effects of baseline covariates on probability of treatment and on clinical outcome. Over a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, antiplatelet therapy was associated with a reduced risk for death (relative risk, 0.52 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.31-0.89]; P = .02). Beta blocker therapy was associated with a reduced for death (relative risk, 0.45 [95% CI: 0.21-0.97]; P = .04) and nonfatal cardiovascular events (relative risk, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.60-0.90]; P = .003). Although limited by small patient numbers, this study suggests that in ARVD, treatment with antiplatelet therapy and beta blockade may associate with a prognostic benefit.

Current views on the management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) is a common condition in both elderly patients and those with other vascular disease. No published randomized controlled trial has demonstrated an overall benefit of revascularization on any clinical or biochemical end-point, and optimal medical therapy in this condition is not clearly defined. In this review we consider the epidemiology of ARVD and discuss the evidence for current medical treatment. We also address the literature on revascularization, consider settings in which an interventional approach may still be considered, and touch upon on-going areas of research.

Epidemiology and natural history of atherosclerotic renovascular disease

Atheromatous renovascular disease (ARVD) is increasingly suspected and diagnosed, and it commonly presents to several different clinical specialties. In this review, the epidemiology, risk factors, comorbid disease associations, natural history, and prognosis of ARVD is described. Atheromatous renovascular disease is strongly associated with macrovascular pathology in other important vascular beds, especially the coronary, aortoiliac and iliofemoral circulations, and also with structural and functional heart disease. These clinicopathologic relationships contribute to the high morbidity and mortality associated with the condition. Understanding of the natural history of renal artery stenosis may enable intensified treatment strategies to reduce associated risk and improve patient prognosis.

Atherosclerotic Renovascular Hypertension : Lessons from Recent Clinical Studies

Atherosclerotic renovascular hypertension is a form of secondary hypertension due to renal artery stenosis. After the introduction of medical therapy such as with statins and angiotensin blocking agents, it has been considered a very slowly progressive disease. In the 1990s, surgical methods were compared to radiological intervention and showed no additional benefits. Recent clinical data also demonstrate that in cases of relatively stable atherosclerotic renovascular disease, medical therapy is as effective as other interventions with regard to patient outcomes. In this paper the recent clinical outcomes are reviewed.

Effects of renal volume and single-kidney glomerular filtration rate on renal functional outcome in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Renal functional outcome is unpredictable after revascularization of high-grade atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS). 'Hibernating' parenchyma describes acute parenchymal injury where renal dysfunction is potentially reversible with treatment of the stenosis. We analysed renal parenchymal volume (PV) and single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (SK-GFR) characteristics to identify kidneys with hibernating parenchyma and hence determine renal functional outcome after revascularization.

METHODS

Fifty patients with > or =50% RAS underwent baseline analyses: (i) PV using magnetic resonance imaging; (ii) radioisotopic SK-GFR. Twenty-one patients (27 kidneys) underwent renal revascularization and 29 medical therapy alone.

RESULTS

Patients with revascularized kidneys manifesting high PV:SK-GFR showed improvement in global estimated GFR compared to conservatively managed counterparts at 6 months and 1 year (6 months: 6.2 +/- 2.9 versus -3.7 +/- 6.8, P = 0.038; 1 year: 3.5 +/- 3.0 versus -5.1 +/- 5.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.021). Twelve revascularized patients (16 kidneys) underwent repeat SK-GFR 4 months post-revascularization. Six of 16 revascularized kidneys had high baseline PV:SK-GFR and showed improved SK-GFR compared to kidneys with low or normal PV:SK-GFR (6.3 +/- 2.0 versus -0.9 +/- 4.2 ml/min, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that, after revascularization, GFR improvement is likely if there is a disproportionately higher baseline PV:SK-GFR in the RAS kidney. Analysing these parameters can potentially identify these 'hibernating' kidneys and aid determination of renal functional outcome in RAS.