Changes in antinuclear serology in patients with spondylarthropathy under sulphasalazine treatment

Traitement du lupus érythémateux chronique par sulfasalazine (18 cas)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and the tolerance of sulfasalazine in the treatment of chronic lupus erythematosus (CLE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prescribed sulfasalazine (2 g/d) for 18 patients with severe CLE, all of whom had contraindications for or treatment failure with antimalarial drugs and thalidomide. This study analyses their response to treatment, duration of therapy, reasons for stopping, adverse effects, and the influence of the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) phenotype.

RESULTS

We observed 10 complete and 3 partial responses, and 4 patients maintained complete response for at least 7 years. Eight patients experienced adverse effects, and 2 needed to stop treatment (because of photosensitization and development of antinuclear antibodies). All side effects occurred in the first 3 months of treatment. None of the 18 patients developed systemic lupus erythematosus. Of the 10 complete responders, 9 were rapid acetylators (RA), while 4 of the 5 who failed to respond were slow acetylators (SA). Leukopenia and photosensitization were observed in SA patients, while different side effects occurred in RA patients (headaches, diarrhea, moderate increase in liver enzymes and antinuclear antibodies).

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm our earlier reports and demonstrate that sulfasalazine can be used successfully to treat severe CLE. NAT2 genotyping before initiating treatment helps to identify potential responders and avoid side effects. In RA patients, sulfasalazine can be an alternative to thalidomide after antimalarial drugs, whereas in SA patients, it should remain a third-line treatment, to be used only after antimalarials and thalidomide.

The effect of TNFalpha blockade on the antinuclear antibody profile in patients with chronic arthritis: biological and clinical implications

Since the first proof of efficacy of TNFalpha blockade, both the number of patients treated worldwide and the number of indications for treatment with TNFalpha blockers have grown steadily. Surprisingly, the profound immunomodulation induced by anti-TNFalpha therapy is associated with a relatively low incidence of immune-related complications such as lupus-like syndromes and demyelinating disease. This contrasts sharply with the prominent induction of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibodies during TNFalpha blockade. Although this phenomenon has been recognized for several years, the clinical and biological implications are not yet fully understood. In this review, recent studies analysing the effect of TNFalpha blockade (infliximab and etanercept) on the ANA profile in autoimmune arthritis will be discussed. Taken together, these reports indicate that the prominent ANA and anti-dsDNA autoantibody response is 1) not a pure class effect of TNFalpha blockers, 2) independent of the disease background, 3) largely restricted to the induction of short-term IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies, and 4) not associated with other serological or clinically relevant signs of lupus. Nevertheless, a careful follow-up of patients treated with TNFalpha blockers remains mandatory, including monitoring for lupus-like characteristics.

Repeated infusions of infliximab, a chimeric anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody, in patients with active spondyloarthropathy: one year follow up

BACKGROUND

In a pilot study, the anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody, infliximab, induced a rapid and significant improvement in global, peripheral, and axial disease manifestations of patients with active spondyloarthropathy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether repeated infusions of infliximab would effectively and safely maintain the observed effect.

METHODS

Safety and efficacy of a maintenance regimen (5 mg/kg infliximab every 14 weeks) was evaluated using the measurements reported in the pilot study. Of the 21 patients, 19 completed the one year follow up for efficacy; two patients changed to another dosing regimen after week 12 owing to partial lack of efficacy. However, they are still being followed up for safety analysis.

RESULTS

After each re-treatment a sustained significant decrease of all disease manifestations was observed. Before re-treatment, symptoms recurred in 3/19 (16%) at week 20, in 13/19 (68%) at week 34, and in 15/19 (79%) at week 48. No withdrawals due to adverse events occurred. Twelve minor infectious episodes were observed. Twelve patients (57%) developed antinuclear antibodies; in four of them (19%) anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected. However, no lupus-like symptoms occurred.

CONCLUSION

In this open study of infliximab in patients with active spondyloarthropathy, the significant improvement of all disease manifestations was maintained over a one year follow up period without major adverse events. Although recurrence of symptoms was noted in a rising number of patients before each re-treatment, no loss of efficacy was observed after re-treatment.

HLA-B27 associated spondyloarthropathy, an autoimmune disease based on crossreactivity between bacteria and HLA-B27?

Most autoimmune diseases are associated with certain HLA types. Therefore, spondyloarthropathies (SpA) strongly associated with HLA-B27, are also often classified as autoimmune diseases. This study questions whether SpA indeed fulfils the criteria of an autoimmune disease. The Medline database was searched for all reports between 1966 and April 1998 on the presence of autoimmune reactivity in SpA patients. This search yielded 45 articles on this subject. Only eight articles study T cell reactivity. Twelve reports were found on the assessment of antibodies crossreacting between bacteria and HLA-B27. In the 45 studies demonstrating autoimmune reactions in SpA patients proper controls matched for HLA-B27, sex and age were nearly always lacking. Therefore, it is concluded that the frequency of increased autoreactivity in sera from patients and controls is not significantly different, and that this lack of autoreactivity does not justify classification of SpA as an autoimmune disease. As crossreactive antibodies against bacteria and HLA-B27 were equally present in sera from patients and controls, the pathogenetic significance of molecular mimicry between various bacteria and HLA-B27 is questionable. Furthermore, the regions of the B27 molecule that are supposed to be crossreactive with bacteria, differ in one or more amino acids among the distinct B27 subtypes. Although these differences strongly influence the binding of antibodies to the B27 molecule, there was no relation between the degree of crossreactivity of certain subtypes and the association of these subtypes with SpA. In conclusion, there is no evident proof that SpA is an autoimmune disease attributable to crossreactivity between bacteria and HLA-B27.