From bench to bedside: discovering rules for antibody design, and improving serotherapy with monoclonal antibodies

Antibody Engineering

Advanced molecular biology techniques developed during the past few decades have allowed the industry to exploit and commercialize the natural defense mechanisms that antibodies provide. This review discusses the latest advances in antibody-engineering technologies to enhance clinical efficacy and outcomes. For the constant regions, the choice of the antibody class and isotype has to be made carefully to suit the therapeutic applications. Engineering of the Fc region, either by direct targeted mutagenesis or by modifying the nature of its N -glycan, has played an important role in recent years in increasing half-life or controlling effector functions. The variable regions of the antibody are responsible for binding affinity and exquisite specificity to the target molecule, which together with the Fc determine the drug's efficacy and influence the drug dose required to obtain the desired effectiveness. A key requirement during antibody development is therefore to affinity mature the variable regions when necessary, so that they bind the therapeutic target with sufficiently high affinity to guarantee effective occupancy over prolonged periods. If the antibody was obtained from a non-human source, such as rodents, a humanization process has to be applied to minimize immunogenicity while maintaining the desired binding affinity and selectivity. Finally, we discuss the next next-generation antibodies, such as antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and immunocytokines, which are being developed to meet future challenges.

Pre-clinical strategies and safety issues in developing therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

Although mAbs present a different set of challenges from other product classes, and the pre-clinical safety evaluation may need to be more extensive than for other medicinal products to overcome the limited predictive value of conventional pre-clinical test systems, the level of risk associated with first administration to human subjects can be effectively mitigated. This article seeks to provide a systematic approach to identifying and addressing the pertinent risks relative to the characteristics of the particular mAb product before the first administration to human subjects.

Therapeutic T-cell manipulation in rheumatoid arthritis: past, present and future

Accumulating evidence suggests that RA is a T-cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Early attempts at disease modulation using strategies such as CD4 mAbs were severely hampered by a lack of biomarkers of autoreactivity. Recently, however, co-stimulation blockade has emerged as an effective treatment for RA. Alongside a greatly improved mechanistic understanding of immune regulation, this has rekindled hopes for authentic and robust immune programming. The final pieces of the jigsaw are not yet in place for RA but, in other disciplines, emerging treatment paradigms such as non-mitogenic anti-CD3 mAbs, autoantigenic peptides and even cellular therapies are providing hope for a future in which immunopathology can be specifically and vigorously curtailed.

Engineering and characterization of a mouse/human chimeric anti-phencyclidine monoclonal antibody

Previously, our laboratory produced a high affinity, anti-phencyclidine (PCP) murine monoclonal antibody (mAb6B5) that also binds other PCP-like arylcyclohexylamines. In this project, mAb6B5 is engineered into a mouse/human chimera (ch-mAb6B5) to assess the feasibility of developing it into a medication for PCP and PCP-like drug abuse. To create ch-mAb6B5, the light and heavy chain constant regions of mAb6B5 were replaced with human kappa and IgG(2) constant regions in order to decrease its potential immunogenicity in humans. To be an effective anti-PCP medication, ch-mAb6B5 must retain the critical immunochemical binding properties of mAb6B5. Expression vectors containing ch-mAb6B5 light chain and heavy chain cDNA were constructed and expressed in the murine myeloma cell line P3X63-Ag8.653. Immunoassays confirm that ch-mAb6B5 is indeed a chimera, composed of mAb6B5's PCP-binding variable domains and human kappa and IgG constant regions. Radioimmunoassays show that ch-mAb6B5 has the same drug-binding profile as mAb6B5. Ch-mAb6B5 and mAb6B5 bind PCP with a K(D) of 0.67 nM and 1.17 nM (respectively) and bind PCP-like arylcyclohexylamines 1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine and N-ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine with similar specificity. Additionally, ch-mAb6B5 and mAb6B5 have the same calculated isoelectric points and molecular weights, critical properties in antigen-antibody interactions. These data demonstrate that mouse/human ch-mAb6B5, a "more human" version of murine mAb6B5, retains mAb6B5's unique drug-binding properties. This work supports our continued efforts to develop ch-mAb6B5 into a medication for PCP and PCP-like drug abuse - introducing the intriguing possibility of using a single therapeutic mAb for treating a class of abused drugs.

Fatos e mitos sobre imunomoduladores

O objetivo deste artigo é discutir alguns fatos dos imunomoduladores modernos que podem ser úteis para o dermatologista clínico. Outro objetivo importante é o de dissipar mitos que possam ter impacto negativo no uso dessas drogas pelo clínico. O foco inicial está em imunomoduladores estimuladores que podem conduzir à acentuação da resposta normal das células imunocompetentes. Para tanto, diversos aspectos associados à regulação do sistema imune e às vias regulatórias das células do sistema imune são mencionados. Discutem-se a regulação aberrante e seu impacto no sistema imune e examina-se a classe de drogas imunossupressoras que têm sua função bem estabelecida. Diversas drogas não foram mencionadas. A razão para isso é o foco do artigo que pretende cobrir os fatos bem estabelecidos ou os mitos que as novas evidências científicas modificaram. Com esse padrão em mente, é provável que exista uma quantidade considerável de similaridade nos conceitos, uma vez que descrevem drogas imunomoduladoras. Nesse contexto, a intenção de fornecer novas perspectivas de como o sistema imune pode ser modulado por essas drogas supera esse problema.

Novel ligands for cancer diagnosis: Selection of peptide ligands for identification and isolation of B-cell lymphomas

OBJECTIVE

Lymphoma and leukemia account for nearly 8% of cancer fatalities each year. Present treatments do not differentiate between normal and malignant cells. New reagents that distinguish malignant cells and enable the isolation of these cells from the normal background will enhance the molecular characterization of disease and specificity of treatment.

METHODS

Peptide ligands were selected from a phage-displayed peptide library by biopanning on the B-cell lymphoma line, A20. The isolated peptides were assessed as reagents for identification and isolation of lymphoma cells by flow cytometry and cell capture with magnetic beads.

RESULTS

Two novel peptides and one obtained previously on cardiomyocytes were selected. A20 cells bind phage displaying these peptides 250- to 450-fold over control phage. These phage bind to other bone marrow-derived cancel lines including some macrophage and T cells but do not bind to normal splenocytes. Synthetic constructs of these peptides have binding affinities comparable to B-cell-specific antibodies. Similar to antibodies, these peptides can be used in flow cytometry and magnetic bead capture to distinguish lymphoma cells from normal splenocytes.

CONCLUSION

Bone marrow-derived malignant cells express cell surface markers that can be used to distinguish them from normal cells. These results demonstrate the ability to use an unbiased screen to rapidly generate high-affinity peptide ligands for identification and isolation of lymphoma cells.

Antibody-based therapeutics: focus on prostate cancer

The recent clinical and commercial success of anti-cancer antibodies such as rituximab, trastuzumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab has continued to foster great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for the treatment of both hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies which, in contrast with traditional cytotoxic small molecule drugs, target tumor cells and have a lower impact on non-malignant by-stander organs, the potential increases in efficacy associated with conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drugs clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. A significant number of cell surface proteins, glycoproteins, receptors, enzymes and peptides have been discovered that have become targets for the treatment of advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. A variety of naked antibodies and antibody conjugates have currently progressed through preclinical development and are in early or more advanced stages of clinical development. Clinicians, scientists and prostate cancer patients are all keenly interested to learn whether these agents when administered alone or in combination with other hormonal-based and cytotoxic therapies will show lasting benefit for sufferers of this common disease.

Newer drugs for the treatment of lupus nephritis

This article first reviews the current treatment of lupus nephritis, with a focus on the most serious forms, that is, the proliferative subtypes. Current standards for treatment have been developed empirically. Corticosteroids form the basis of all regimens. Cyclophosphamide given intravenously for prolonged periods is the current gold standard. Azathioprine can be regarded as an effective drug for maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis. Studies on its efficacy in schedules for remission induction are in progress. It has been learned from studies on 'conventional' immunosuppression that randomised, clinical trials should comprise large numbers of patients and a follow-up of many years to elucidate differences between effective strategies. These requirements are not met by any of the 'new' treatments we discuss in this review. There is only limited experience in patients with lupus nephritis with drugs that are currently used for immunosuppression in other autoimmune diseases, such as methotrexate, cyclosporin and high-dose intravenous gammaglobulins, nor with new immunosuppressive drugs that have been developed for immunosuppression in organ transplantation (mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, fludarabine and cladribine). Hormonal therapy with the weak androgen prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA) has no role in treatment of active lupus nephritis. There are interesting experiences with agents that have evolved from progress in immunobiology and in our understanding of immunological processes. These modalities enable more specific immunosuppression and include monoclonal antibodies directed at immune cells, cytokines and components of the complement system, constructs developed to induce tolerance in pathogenic B cells, and gene therapy. Finally, we review data on autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. We conclude that some strategies (like mycophenolate mofetil) are good candidates for further investigation in large-scale, prospective, randomised trials with prolonged follow-up (which are almost by definition hard to perform). Most new biological agents still are in a pre-clinical phase.

Antibody-based therapeutics in oncology

The recent clinical and commercial success of anticancer antibodies, such as rituximab (Rituxan) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) has created great interest in antibody-based therapeutics for hematopoietic malignancies and solid tumors. Given the likely lower toxicity for antibodies versus small molecules, the potential increase in efficacy by conjugation to radioisotopes and other cellular toxins and the ability to characterize the target with clinical laboratory diagnostics to improve the drug's clinical performance, it is anticipated that current and future antibody therapeutics will find substantial roles alone and in combination therapy strategies for the treatment of patients with cancer. It is also likely that conjugation strategies will add new radiolabeled and toxin-linked products to the market to complement the recent approvals of ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and gemtuzumab ozogamycin (Mylotarg). However, although there are a large number of agents in both early and later stages of clinical development, only a handful will make it through regulatory approval and become successful products. This review considers the structure of anticancer therapeutic antibodies, the techniques used to reduce their antigenicity, factors that influence efficacy and toxicity, conjugation with isotopes and toxins and antibody target validation.