Elevated carcinoembryonic antigen predicts rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis

Clinical and immunological characteristics and prognosis of patients with autoantibody negative dermatomyositis: a case control study

OBJECTIVES

Myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated antibodies (MAAs) are associated with distinctive dermatomyositis (DM) clinical phenotypes. The aim of this study is to explicate the clinical and immunological features of MSAs-negative DM patients.

METHODS

A total of 515 individuals diagnosed with DM was screened from 2013 to 2022 and 220 DM patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort. Clinical and laboratory data of these patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

MSAs-negative DM patients were categorized into two groups: MAAs-negative (MSAs (-)/MAAs (-)) group and MAAs-positive (MSAs (-)/MAAs (+)) group. The percentage of Raynaud's phenomenon (P=0.026) was higher in the MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) DM patients than the MSAs-positive DM patients and MSAs (-)/MAAs (-) DM patients. The proportion of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) in the MSAs-negative DM patients was lower than that in the MSAs-positive group. The MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) group had a higher proportion of organizing pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia (P=0.011), and elevated eosinophils in their bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (P=0.008). Counts of lymphocytes (P=0.001) and CD16+CD56+ natural killer (NK) cells (P=0.012) were higher in the MSAs-negative group. Additionally, the percentage of CD4+TNFα+ (P=0.040), CD4+IFNγ+ (P=0.037), and CD4+IL-2+ (P=0.018) cells among total CD4+ T cells were higher in the MSA-negative DM patients compared with the MSAs-positive DM patients. Besides, MSAs-negative patients demonstrated a more favorable prognosis than MSAs-positive patients. Multivariable regression analysis identified advanced onset age, higher level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and RP-ILD as risk factors for mortality in DM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with MSAs-positive group, MSAs-negative DM patients suffered less from organ involvement compared with MSAs-positive group and tend to have better prognosis. Key Points MSAs-negative DM patients exhibited distinct characteristics in comparison with MSAs-positive DM patients:   • The MSAs (-)/MAAs (+) DM patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of organizing pneumonia (OP) and usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), and elevated eosinophil counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.   • CEA levels were lower in MSAs-negative patients compared with MSAs-positive patients.   • Elevated counts of lymphocytes and CD16+CD56+ NK cells were identified in the MSAs-negative patients. Additionally, proportions of CD4+TNFα+, CD4+IFNγ+, and CD4+IL-2+ cells among total CD4+ T cells were higher in the MSAs-negative DM patients compared with DM MSAs-positive DM patients.   • MSAs-negative DM patients had a more favorable prognosis than MSAs-positive DM patients. A multivariable regression analysis revealed the advanced onset age, high CEA levels, and RP-ILD were risk factors for mortality in DM patients.

Anti-MDA5 Antibody-Positive Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis Associated With Multiple Heterologous Carcinomas: A Case Report

Dermatomyositis (DM), an autoimmune disorder, is linked to increased malignancy risk. A 53-year-old man with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)-positive clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) and rapidly progressing interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) developed heterochronous gastric and colorectal cancers. Early endoscopic screenings led to successful curative resections, preventing recurrence. Despite low cancer incidence assumptions in patients with anti-MDA5-positive RP-ILD, this case advocates for reevaluation and periodic cancer screenings to enhance management, considering the improved survival with intensive therapy. Vigilance for multiple carcinomas at various time points is vital in CADM management.

Antibodies against Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier Activating Enzyme May Be a Protective Factor from Rapid Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients Bearing Antibodies against Melanoma Differentiation Associated Gene 5

Background: Anti-MDA5 antibody-bearing (anti-MDA5+)-dermatomyositis (DM) or polymyositis (PM) is notorious for causing rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RPILD) and/or cancers with high mortality rate. However, anti-MDA5 antibodies (Abs) are also found in other connective tissue diseases and their link with RPILD, especially with regard to the mortality rate, are unknown. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 71 patients bearing anti-MDA5-Abs in serum, stratified them in terms of a presence or absence of RPILD, and evaluated their clinical features, laboratory findings, associated myositis antibodies, concurrent connective tissue disease (CTD) as well as newly developed malignancies. Results: In total, 39 (55%) patients presented with DM/PM, but 32 (45%) did not. In total, 22 of the former and 11 of the latter developed RPILD eventually, accounting for a total of 46% of all MDA-5 bearing patients. On the other hand, 15 of all 71 (21.1%) patients had cancers. Among the 32 patients who did not have DM/PM, 27 (38.0% of all 71) had other CTDs, indicating that only 5 (7.0% of 71) patients did not have CTDs. Senility (odds ratio (OR) = 1.816, p = 0.032), presence of anti-Ro-52 antibody (OR = 1.676, p = 0.018), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP, OR = 4.354, p < 0.001) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, OR = 2.625, p = 0.005) posed risks for RPILD. High lactose dehydrogenase (LDH, p = 0.009), CRP (p = 0.001) and CEA (p = 0.001), ferritin (p ≤ 0.001) and low albumin (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. Anti-SAE antibodies were negatively correlated with RPILD as analyzed by univariate (OR = 0.245, p = 0.017) and multivariate (OR = 0.058, p = 0.036) regressions, indicating that they may be a protective factor in relation to RPILD (OR = 0.543, p = 0.008) or fatality (OR = 0.707, p = 0.012), which was also demonstrated in subgroup analyses. Conclusions: In contrast to various risk factors for RPILD or mortality, anti-SAE antibodies might conversely be a protective factor in anti-MDA5+ patients.

Prognostic value of serum oncomarkers for patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Different types of inflammatory processes and fibrosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung disease (ILD), a heterogeneous, diffuse, parenchymal lung disease. Acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD is characterized by significant respiratory deterioration and is associated with high mortality rates. Several serum oncomarkers have been used to determine the prognosis of ILD; however, the prognostic value of serum oncomarker levels in patients with AE-ILD remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of serum oncomarker levels in patients with AE-ILD and its main subtypes.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

The serum levels of 8 oncomarkers in 281 patients hospitalized with AE-ILD at our institution between 2017 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The baseline characteristics and serum oncomarker levels were compared between the survival and non-survival groups of AE-ILD and its main subtypes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognosis-related markers, and the best prognostic predictor was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULT

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF; n = 65), idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP; n = 26), and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD; n = 161) were the three main subtypes of ILD. The in-hospital mortality rate among patients with AE-ILD was 21%. The serum oncomarker levels of most patients with AE-ILD and its main subtypes in the non-survival group were higher than those in the survival group. Multivariate analysis revealed that ferritin and cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA21-1) were independent prognostic risk factors for patients hospitalized with AE-ILD or AE-CTD-ILD. CYFRA21-1 was identified as an independent prognostic risk factor for patients hospitalized with AE-IPF or AE-iNSIP.

CONCLUSION

CYFRA21-1 may be a viable biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients with AE-ILD, regardless of the underlying subtype of ILD. Ferritin has a prognostic value in patients with AE-ILD or AE-CTD-ILD.

Predictors of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease and prognosis in Chinese patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis

Background

Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) is the most serious complication of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-positive dermatomyositis (anti-MDA5+ DM). This study was performed to assess the prognostic factors of patients with anti-MDA5+ DM and the clinical characteristics and predictors of anti-MDA5+ DM in combination with RP-ILD.

Methods

In total, 73 MDA5+ DM patients were enrolled in this study from March 2017 to December 2021. They were divided into survival and non-survival subgroups and non-RP-ILD and RP-ILD subgroups.

Results

The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were independent prognostic factors in patients with anti-MDA5+ DM: the elevated LDH was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.01), whereas the elevated PNI was associated with reduced mortality (p < 0.001). The elevated LDH was independent risk prognostic factor for patients with anti-MDA5+ DM (HR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.02-4.83, p = 0.039), and the elevated PNI was independent protective prognostic factor (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 - 0.94; p = 0.039). Patients who had anti-MDA5+ DM with RP-ILD had a significantly higher white blood cell count and LDH concentration than those without RP-ILD (p = 0.007 and p = 0.019, respectively). In contrast, PNI was significantly lower in patients with RP-ILD than those without RP-ILD (p < 0.001). The white blood cell count and elevated LDH were independent and significant risk factors for RP-ILD (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.12 - 2.13, p = 0.009 and OR 8.68, 95% CI: 1.28 - 58.83, p = 0.027, respectively), whereas the lymphocyte was an independent protective factor (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01 - 0.81; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

The elevated LDH and elevated PNI were independent prognostic factors for patients with anti-MDA5+ DM. The elevated LDH was independent risk factor for RP-ILD. Patients with anti-MDA5+ DM could benefit from the measurement of LDH and PNI, which are inexpensive and simple parameters that could be used for diagnosis as well as prediction of the extent of lung involvement and prognosis.

Elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the diagnostic and prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM).

METHOD

Clinical data of 200 patients with PM/DM and 204 healthy controls were retrospectively reviewed. We examined whether the PLR and NLR were associated with PM/DM.

RESULTS

The PLR and NLR were higher in patients with PM/DM than in controls (both P < 0.001). The PLR and NLR were higher in patients with DM than in those with PM (both P < 0.01). The PLR was higher in the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5 (anti-MDA5) ⁺ PM/DM group than in the anti-MDA5^- PM/DM group (P = 0.002). The NLR in non-survivors was higher than that in survivors (P = 0.01). The NLR was positively correlated with the occurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD). The PLR and NLR were independent predictors of PM/DM, as well as risk factors (both P < 0.001). Moreover, the NLR had a predictive value for PM/DM-ILD and was closely related to mortality (P = 0.033, P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PM/DM have a higher NLR and PLR than healthy controls, especially in those with anti-MDA5⁺. The PLR and NLR are independent risk factors for PM/DM and have some predictive value. The NLR is correlated with ILD and associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with PM/DM. The NLR and PLR may be simple, economical, and accurate diagnostic and prognostic markers for patients with PM/DM. Key points • The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been studied in numerous inflammatory diseases as potential markers, but their clinical significance in polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM) remains unclear. • We examined the changes in the NLR and PLR between patients with PM/DM and healthy controls, as well as their association with mortality, interstitial lung disease, and anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein-5. • Patients with PM/DM may benefit from using the NLR and PLR as simple, economical, and accurate diagnostic and prognostic markers.

Roles of biomarkers in anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis, associated interstitial lung disease, and rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5)-positive dermatomyositis (MDA5⁺ DM) is significantly associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially rapidly progressive ILD (RPILD) due to poor prognosis, resulting in high mortality rates. However, the pathogenic mechanism of MDA5⁺ DM-RPILD is unclear. Although some MDA5⁺ DM patients have a chronic course of ILD, many do not develop RPILD. Therefore, the related biomarkers for the early diagnosis, disease activity monitoring, and prediction of the outcome of RPILD in MDA5⁺ DM patients should be identified. Blood-based biomarkers are minimally invasive and can be easily detected.

METHODS

Recent relative studies related to blood biomarkers in PubMed were reviewed.

RESULTS

An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that dysregulated expression of blood biomarkers related to ILD such as ferritin, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant protein-D (SP-D), and cytokines, and some tumor markers in MDA5⁺ DM may provide information in disease presence, activity, treatment response, and prognosis. These studies have highlighted the great potentials of blood biomarker values for MDA5⁺ DM-ILD and MDA5⁺ DM-RPILD. This review provides an overview of recent studies related to blood biomarkers, besides highlighted protein biomarkers, including antibody (anti-MDA5 IgG subclasses and anti-Ro52 antibody), genetic (exosomal microRNAs and neutrophil extracellular traps related to cell-free DNA), and immune cellular biomarkers in MDA5⁺ DM, MDA5⁺ DM-ILD, and MDA5⁺ DM-RPILD patients, hopefully elucidating the pathogenesis of MDA5⁺ DM-ILD and providing information on the early diagnosis, disease activity monitoring, and prediction of the outcome of the ILD, especially RPILD.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, this review may provide insight to guide treatment decisions for MDA5⁺ DM-RPILD patients and improve outcomes.

The significance of elevated tumor markers among patients with interstitial lung diseases

The clinical implication of using serum tumor markers in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is inconclusive. In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 1176 subjects (294 with ILDs and 882 healthy controls). Eligible patients were who had at least one or more available tumor marker results [carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, CA 125, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] with no evidence of malignancies or other benign diseases that could be related to the increasing concentration of the values. The healthy controls selected from a health screening program were also screened for the presence of active cancer, and matched at a ratio of 1:3 with age and sex. The proportion of patients with abnormal values in the ILD group (121, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); 173, non-IPF-ILDs) was higher than in the matched control group (CEA, 21.5% vs. 5.5%; CA 19-9, 27.9% vs. 4.0%; CA 125, 36.4% vs. 2.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher CEA levels were associated with shorter survival after adjusting for age, sex, lung function, and ILD subtypes (hazard ratio: 2.323, 95% confidence interval: 1.271–4.248, P = 0.006). In subgroup analysis, CEA remained a prognostic factor in patients with non-IPF-ILDs, but not in those with IPF.

Risk Factors and Predictive Model for Dermatomyositis Associated with Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease

Background

Rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) is a significant complication that determines the prognosis of dermatomyositis (DM). Early RP-ILD diagnosis can improve screening and diagnostic efficiency and provide meaningful guidance to carry out early and aggressive treatment.

Methods

A retrospective screening of 284 patients with DM was performed. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients were recorded. The risk factors of RP-ILD in DM patients were screened by logistic regression (LR) and machine learning methods, and the prediction models of RP-ILD were developed by machine learning methods, namely least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost).

Results

According to the result of univariate LR, disease duration is a protective factor for RP-ILD, and ESR, CRP, anti-Ro-52 antibody and anti-MDA5 antibody are risk factors for RP-ILD. The top 10 important variables of the 3 machine learning models were intersected to obtain common important variables, and there were 5 common important variables, namely disease duration, LDH, CRP, anti-Ro-52 antibody and anti-MDA5 antibody. The AUC of LASSO, RF and XGBoost test set were 0.661, 0.667 and 0.867, respectively. We further validated the performance of these three models on validation set, and the results showed that, the AUC of LASSO, RF and XGBoost were 0.764, 0.727 and 0.909, respectively. Based on the results of the models, XGBoost is the optimal model in this study.

Conclusion

Disease duration, LDH, CRP, anti-Ro-52 antibody and anti-MDA5 antibody are vital risk factors for RP-ILD in DM. The prediction model constructed using XGBoost can be used for risk identification and early intervention in DM patients with RP-ILD and practical application.

Interstitial Lung Disease in Dermatomyositis Without Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Autoantibodies: Study of a Series of 72 Patients From a Single Cohort

Objective

The clinical features of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with dermatomyositis (DM) and negative myositis autoantibodies had not been exactly demonstrated previously. This study aimed to describe and expand the phenotype of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in this cohort of patients.

Methods

A total of 1125 consecutive Chinese patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) between 2006 and 2020 were screened retrospectively. All proven cases of isolated ILD with both negative myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) and negative myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA) were selected for inclusion. The clinical features and outcome among this group, MDA5⁺DM (DM patients with positive anti-MDA5 antibody) and ASS (patients with positive anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetases antibodies were recorded and compared.

Results

Of 1125 IIM patients with an average follow-up of 6 years, 154 DM patients with negative MSA and MAA (MSA/MAA) were identified, with an ILD incidence of 46.8%. DM-ILD Patients with negative MSA/MAA presented younger age at onset (p<0.001), lower incidence of elevated CA153 (p=0.03) and fever (p=0.04)than those ILD patients with MDA5⁺DM and ASS.The estimated high-resolution computed tomography patterns of ILD showed non-specific interstitial pneumonia (66.6%), followed by organizing pneumonia in patients with negative MSA/MAA. OP pattern was more common in patients with MDA5⁺DM (69.7%), and the ratios of the OP (48.7%) and NSIP (51.3%) patterns were almost equal in patients with ASS. Of these DM-ILD patients with negative MSA/MAA, 25% developed rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). Patients with RP-ILD had a shorter disease duration (p=0.002), higher percentage of positive ANA(p=0.01) and organizing pneumonia patterns (p=0.04), elevated CYFRA211(p=0.04) and decreased FiO2/PaO2 (p<0.001) than those with chronic progressive ILD. The incidence of OP pattern in RP-ILD patients with negative MSA/MAA was lower than in those RPILD patients with MDA5⁺ DM (75%) and ASS (89%) (p=0.006). The cumulative 5- and 10-year survival rates in the DM-ILD patients with negative MSA/MAA were 91% and 88%, respectively, during the long-term follow-up study. And they had more favorable survival rate compared with ILD patients with MDA5⁺DM and ASS (p<0.001). An independent prognostic factor was identified as decreased PaO2/FiO2 (hazard ratio, 0.97; p=0.004].

Conclusions

This study indicates DM-ILD patients with negative MSA/MAA had favorable long-term outcomes. Decreased baseline PaO2/FiO2 acted as an independent prognostic factor for this group of patients.

A Matrix Prediction Model for the 6-Month Mortality Risk in Patients With Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Protein-5-Positive Dermatomyositis

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the baseline independent risk factors for predicting 6-month mortality of patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5)-positive dermatomyositis (DM) and develop a matrix prediction model formed by these risk factors.

Methods

The hospitalized patients with DM who completed at least 6-month follow-up were recruited as a derivation cohort. The primary exposure was defined as positive anti-MDA5 at the baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause 6-month mortality after enrollment. A matrix prediction model was developed in the derivation cohort, and another published cohort was used for external validation.

Results

In derivation cohort, 82 patients with DM were enrolled (mean age of onset 50 ± 11 years and 63% women), with 40 (49%) showing positive anti-MDA5. Gottron sign/papules (OR: 5.135, 95%CI: 1.489–17.708), arthritis (OR: 5.184, 95%CI: 1.455–18.467), interstitial lung disease (OR: 7.034, 95%CI: 1.157–42.785), and higher level of C4 (OR: 1.010, 95%CI: 1.002–1.017) were the independent associators with positive anti-MDA5 in patients with DM. Patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM had significant higher 6-month all-cause mortality than those with anti-MDA5-negative (30 vs. 0%). Among the patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM, compared to the survivors, non-survivors had significantly advanced age of onset (59 ± 6 years vs. 46 ± 9 years), higher rates of fever (75 vs. 18%), positive carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA, 75 vs. 14%), higher level of ferritin (median 2,858 ug/L vs. 619 ug/L, all p < 0.05). A stepwise multivariate Cox regression showed that ferritin ≥1,250 μg/L (HR: 10.4, 95%CI: 1.8–59.9), fever (HR: 11.2, 95%CI: 2.5–49.9), and positive CEA (HR: 5.2, 95%CI: 1.0–25.7) were the independent risk factors of 6-month mortality. A matrix prediction model was built to stratify patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM into different subgroups with various probabilities of 6-month mortality risk. In an external validation cohort, the observed 6-month all-cause mortality was 78% in high-risk group, 43% in moderate-risk group, and 25% in low-risk group, which shows good accuracy of the model.

Conclusion

Baseline characteristics such as fever, ferritin ≥1,250 μg/L, and positive CEA are the independent risk factors for 6-month all-cause mortality in patients with anti-MDA5-positive DM. A novel matrix prediction model composed of these three clinical indicators is first proposed to provide a chance for the exploration of individual treatment strategies in anti-MDA5-positive DM subgroups with various probabilities of mortality risk.

Tumor markers are associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in adult-dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVES

DM-associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (DM-RP-ILD) has been the clinical conundrum. We assess the serum levels of tumor markers (TMs) in different types of ILD, and explore the diagnostic utility of TMs for DM/ADM-RP-ILD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, data including clinical and laboratory records were collected from the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2015, to June 2020. Tumor markers (TMs) include CEA, CA153, CA724, CA125, and CA199. Spearman analysis, ROC, and Kaplan-Meier curve were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Total 272 patients (149 DM and 123 ADM) were enrolled, 152 (55.88%) with ILD (116 with chronic ILD, 36 with RP-ILD) and 120 (44.12%) without ILD among them. The serum levels of CEA and ferritin were significantly higher in patients with RP-ILD than in the other two groups. Serum CA125, CA199, and CA153 levels in patients with RP-ILD were higher than those without ILD. CEA levels were associated with the ferritin, KL-6 and anti-MDA5 levels, and CEA concentration was significantly negatively correlated with DLco (P = 0.016, R² =  - 0.281). CEA [AUC = 0.7, 95% CI = (0.594, 0.806)] and ferritin [AUC = 0.737, 95% CI = (0.614, 0.860)] had diagnosed value for patients developing RP-ILD. Patients with high serum CEA levels had higher mortality rate within the DM-ILD population.

CONCLUSIONS

TMs and ferritin were increased in DM/ADM-RP-ILD, and serum CEA and CA153 levels can evaluate disease severity of DM. And CEA and ferritin can be used as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers for patients with DM-RP-ILD. Key Points • Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious complication of DM, and is a leading cause of mortality, especially rapidly progressive ILD. • Tumor markers as a kind of noninvasive detection can reflect the disease severity of DM, and CEA and ferritin can be used to identify patients with RP-ILD.

Clinical Characteristics and Management of Patients With Clinical Amyopathic Dermatomyositis: A Retrospective Study of 64 Patients at a Tertiary Dermatology Department

Background: Clinical amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM) represents a subtype of 5–20% of patients with dermatomyositis (DM), which can be categorized into amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM) and hypomyopathic dermatomyositis (HDM). The characteristics of patients with CADM are still limited in English literature.

Objective: To investigate clinical features, cutaneous findings, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment regimen of CADM patients.

Methods: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with CADM at Peking Union Medical College Hospital by dermatologists were retrospectively analyzed. Data were recorded in the electronic database at each offline clinical consultation and directly extracted from medical records. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) classification was used to identify and classify patients with CADM. Published studies were searched to extract relevant data of CADM patients.

Results: This cohort included 38 ADM patients and 26 HDM patients. 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria classified 67.2% of patients with CADM into probable or definite DM. Antimalarials were given to a majority of CADM patients (72.6%, n = 45). However, 68.8% (31 out of 45) required at least one aggressive agent combined with hydroxychloroquine due to insufficient response or side effects. The median of systemic treatments in HDM was significantly higher than ADM (p = 0.007). The number of ADM patients using antimalarials as monotherapy was significantly higher than that of HDM patients (p = 0.031), while the number of HDM patients receiving steroids combined with immunosuppressants was significantly higher (p = 0.025). The median of Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) score improvement was 11.5 and 10.5 for ADM and HDM after a median follow-up of 31.5 and 32.5 months, respectively. Six patients with normal muscle strength developed muscle weakness after a median of 10.5 months (IQR 9-13), and elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit might indicate their muscle weakness development.

Conclusions: 32.8% of patients may be overlooked using the three skin variables of 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria. The response rate to single hydroxychloroquine in our cohort was 68.8%. Detailed treatment modalities were different among ADM and HDM. Long-term monitoring for the development of myositis in patients with CADM, especially those with elevated inflammatory markers at initial visit, may be warranted.