1
|
Chaplin H, Simpson C, Wilkins K, Meehan J, Ng N, Galloway J, Scott IC, Sen D, Tattersall R, Moss-Morris R, Lempp H, Norton S. Management of refractory disease and persistent symptoms in inflammatory arthritis: qualitative framework analysis of interviews with patients and healthcare professionals. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2024; 8:rkae076. [PMID: 38966397 PMCID: PMC11223812 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to explore patients' and clinicians' experiences in managing and living with refractory disease (RD) and persistent physical and emotional symptoms (PPES) in patients with RA or polyarticular JIA from their perspectives through interviews and/or focus groups. Methods A qualitative exploration with 25 patients and 32 multidisciplinary rheumatology healthcare professionals (HCPs) was conducted to obtain participants respective understanding and experiences of managing RD/PPES and its impact on the patient-professional relationship. A pragmatic epistemology approach with framework analysis was employed. Results Four key themes were identified from both patients and professionals in the management of RD/PPES: risk/perpetuating factors/triggers; need for a patient-centred holistic approach to care, diagnosis and treatment; discordance and impact on the patient-practitioner relationship and current problems in managing RD/PPES. These themes covered 22 subthemes, with none being patient specific and seven being HCP specific. Suggestions for potential management strategies were highlighted throughout, such as involving other specialties or a multidisciplinary team, assessing/treating patient-reported outcome measures and psychosocial factors, patient (re)education, need for adjustments/aids or adaptations, checking the diagnosis and further investigations/imaging and optimizing medications. Conclusion Management strategies need to be developed that enable appropriate treatment plans for those with RD/PPES that account for wider biopsychosocial factors beyond inflammation and reduce discordance in the patient-practitioner relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Chaplin
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Carol Simpson
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Wilkins
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica Meehan
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nora Ng
- Rheumatology Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UK
- Rheumatology Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ian C Scott
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Debajit Sen
- Rheumatology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Versus Arthritis Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Tattersall
- Rheumatology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Barbara Ansell National Network for Adolescent and Young Adult Rheumatology, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yazdanbakhsh K, Provan D, Semple JW. The role of T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in refractory immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2023; 203:54-61. [PMID: 37735552 PMCID: PMC11493757 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by a dysregulated immune response against platelets, affecting both their destruction and production. A role for an abnormal T-cell compartment has been established in ITP pathogenesis and treatments that increase platelet counts in patients with ITP have shown improvements in T-cell profiles. On the other hand, patients who were refractory to treatment appear to retain the T-cell abnormalities as before. Myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs) are also emerging as key contributors to the immune pathology of ITP and response to treatment. In this review, we will discuss how various treatments affect the T-cell and MDSC compartments in ITP. The review will focus on studies that have examined the underlying mechanisms and/or genetic basis responsible for refractoriness to a given treatment and highlight remaining challenges in identifying factors and mechanisms to predict response to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Yazdanbakhsh
- Laboratory of Complement Biology, Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute, New York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Drew Provan
- Department of Haematology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - John W. Semple
- Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Office of Medical Services, Region Skane, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chaplin H, Bosworth A, Simpson C, Wilkins K, Meehan J, Nikiphorou E, Moss-Morris R, Lempp H, Norton S. Refractory inflammatory arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289760. [PMID: 37556424 PMCID: PMC10411820 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Various definitions have been proposed for Refractory Disease in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis; however, none were generated for Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis or involving adult and paediatric multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and patients. The study aim is to redefine Refractory Disease, using Delphi methodology. METHODS Three rounds of surveys (one nominal group and two online (2019-2020)) to achieve consensus using a predetermined cut-off were conducted voting on: a) name, b) treatment and inflammation, c) symptoms and impact domains, and d) rating of individual components within domains. Theoretical application of the definition was conducted through a scoping exercise. RESULTS Votes were collected across three rounds from Patients, Researchers and nine multi-disciplinary healthcare professional groups (n = 106). Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis was the most popular name. Regarding treatment and inflammation, these were voted to be kept broad rather than specifying numbers/cut-offs. From 10 domains identified to capture symptoms and disease impact, six domains reached consensus for inclusion: 1) Disease Activity, 2) Joint Involvement, 3) Pain, 4) Fatigue, 5) Functioning and Quality of Life, and 6) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Experiences. Within these domains, 18 components, from an initial pool (n = 73), were identified as related and important to capture multi-faceted presentation of Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis, specifically in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Feasibility of the revised definition was established (2022-2023) with good utility as was applied to 82% of datasets (n = 61) incorporating 20 outcome measures, with two further measures added to increase its utility and coverage of Pain and Fatigue. CONCLUSION Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis has been found to be broader than not achieving low disease activity, with wider biopsychosocial components and factors incorporating Persistent Inflammation or Symptoms identified as important. This definition needs further refinement to assess utility as a classification tool to identify patients with unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Chaplin
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, White Waltham, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Simpson
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Wilkins
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Meehan
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muthu S, Jeyaraman M, Ranjan R, Jha SK. Remission is not maintained over 2 years with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Biol Chem 2021. [DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.0000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
5
|
Muthu S, Jeyaraman M, Ranjan R, Jha SK. Remission is not maintained over 2 years with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Biol Chem 2021; 12:114-130. [PMID: 34904049 PMCID: PMC8637617 DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v12.i6.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (HSCT) is being accepted as a standard of care in various inflammatory diseases. The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been closely evolving with the understanding of disease pathogenesis. With the rising resistance to the traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and targeted biological therapy, researchers are in pursuit of other methods for disease management. Since the ultimate goal of the ideal treatment of RA is to restore immune tolerance, HSCT attracts much attention considering its reparative, paracrine, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a systematic review of studies on HSCT in RA is lacking.
AIM To investigate the role of HSCT in the management of RA.
METHODS A detailed search of PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases was made to identify the relevant articles till September 2020 following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. We extracted data including the number of patients, source of hematopoietic stem cells, their mobilization and conditioning regimens, results, and complications from the eligible studies. Results were dichotomized into success (ACR 50/70) and failure (ACR 20) based on the improvement from baseline characteristics. The methodological quality of the included studies was also assessed. Analysis was performed using OpenMeta[Analysis] software.
RESULTS We included 17 studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 11 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies) with 233 patients for analysis. HSCT provided a significantly beneficial overall improvement in the clinical grades of ACR criteria (Z = 11.309, P < 0.001). However, the remission was noted only till 24 mo and later on the significance of the result was lost (Z = 1.737, P = 0.082). A less than 1% treatment-related mortality was noted from the included studies. No major drug-related toxicities were noted in any of the included studies. All patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT received immunosuppression in the conditioning regimen to counteract the graft-vs-host reaction which made them vulnerable to infections. It is noted that the source of hematopoietic stem cells did not play a role in altering the functional outcome and both autologous (Z = 9.972, P < 0.001) and allogenic (Z = 6.978, P < 0.001) sources produced significant improvement in the outcome compared to the pre-operative state despite having a significant heterogeneity among the studies reporting them (I2 = 99.4, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION Although the available literature is encouraging towards the use of HSCT in refractory cases with significant improvement from baseline till 2 years, the inclusion of HSCT into the standard of care of RA needs further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sathish Muthu
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Delhi 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Dindigul 624001, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Madhan Jeyaraman
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Delhi 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Sri Lalithambigai Medical College and Hospital, Chennai 600095, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Rajni Ranjan
- Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Greater Noida 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Saurabh Kumar Jha
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Sharda University, Delhi 201306, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|