Immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after remission achievement in patients with lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis: redefining the treatment goals

The course of proliferative lupus nephritis is characterized by flares of activity alternating with periods of quiescence against a background of chronic immune dysregulation. An accurate assessment of disease activity is of unassailable importance to tailor therapy. In the present communication, we discuss the available clinical, serologic, and histologic tools to evaluate disease activity and how they may be applied to redefine the treatment goals in lupus nephritis. Traditionally, treatment response is judged by the degree of proteinuria reduction and improvement of kidney function, but this fails to differentiate ongoing inflammatory disease from chronic damage. Despite intensive research, no novel biomarker has proved useful for clinical practice, and we continue to rely on anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels to assess serologic activity. Repeat kidney biopsies sometimes reveal persistent inflammation despite apparent clinical remission, giving credibility to the conviction that histologic remission should be a treatment goal and protocol biopsies be part of the decision-making process. However, the discrepancies between clinical and histologic responses to therapy can be explained by persistent systemic autoimmunity with low-grade immune complex deposition or, alternatively, by delayed clearance of intrarenal inflammation once immunologic remission has been achieved. Because persistent immune dysregulation is the motor of disease activity in lupus nephritis, it should be the principal focus of therapy and monitoring. We propose to replace the traditional induction-remission maintenance protocol by a more dynamic and individualized approach and aim for 3 treatment goals, concomitantly rather than sequentially: (i) clinical remission, by attenuating renal inflammation, using microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and complement levels as biomarkers; (ii) immunologic remission, by decreasing immune complex generation, using anti-double-stranded DNA antibody as a biomarker; and (iii) preservation of kidney function, by curtailing chronic kidney damage, using estimated glomerular filtration rate slope as a biomarker.

Outcomes following immunosuppressive therapy withdrawal after complete renal response in proliferative lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the rate and factors influencing renal relapse (RR) in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) patients who discontinued immunosuppressive therapy (IST), as well as the long-term renal outcomes following RR.

METHODS

Retrospective, single-centre study of biopsy-confirmed LN patients who had received IST for at least 36 months and maintained complete renal response (CRR) for a minimum of 12 months before therapy discontinuation.

RESULTS

Of a total of 106 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 76 with proliferative classes were selected for analysis. The median duration of IST prior to discontinuation was 83.5 months (IQR 25th-75th: 53.5-120). Relapse occurred in 29 patients (38.2%) at a median of 26.5 months (IQR 25th-75th: 9.25-63.5 months) following IST withdrawal. Relapses were classified as severe in 9 cases (31%) and moderate in 16 cases (55.2%). Renal rebiopsy was performed in 25 of these patients (86.2%), with 80% retaining the same histological class.Discontinuation of IST at ≤34 years of age significantly increased the risk of RR (adjusted HR: 3.5). In contrast, an IST duration exceeding 48 months prior to discontinuation (HR: 0.26), maintaining CRR for at least 48 months (HR: 0.32), achieving complete remission per DORIS (definition of remission in systemic lupus erythematosus) criteria at IST withdrawal (HR: 0.21) and gradual IST tapering (HR: 0.09) were associated with a reduced risk of RR.Following reintroduction of IST, 20 out of 29 patients (68.9%) achieved CRR, 5 (17.2%) achieved a partial response and 4 (13.8%) did not respond; of these, 3 patients (10.3%) progressed to end-stage renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful withdrawal of IST is possible in carefully selected patients with proliferative LN. If an RR occurs, most patients are able to remain in remission after resuming IST.

Antimalarials in Lupus Nephritis: How Strong Is the Evidence?

SLE is a chronic multisystem autoimmune disease that affects the kidneys in approximately 50% of patients, with the prevalence rising to as high as 70% in certain populations, such as African American and Asian people. Antimalarials-and particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)-are currently considered a mainstay of therapy, together with immunosuppressants. Over the past decades, several studies have extensively investigated the mechanisms of action of antimalarial agents and their potential beneficial properties in patients with SLE in general. However, the evidence for the therapeutic benefit of HCQ in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) derives mainly from observational studies, conducted in an era before the refinement of induction and maintenance protocols for immunosuppressive therapy. Despite the paucity of high-quality evidence on its efficacy in LN, the nephrology community widely supports the universal use of HCQ in patients with LN, and recommendations for its use are firmly entrenched in various clinical practice guidelines. Nonetheless, the use of antimalarials may also carry inherent risks, underscoring the importance of personalized approaches in these patients. Herein, we comprehensively review the available literature on antimalarials in LN, aiming to update the current evidence, limitations, and future perspectives for the use of antimalarials in adults.

Risk of flare in patients with SLE in remission after hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have provided evidence that the discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and chloroquine (CQ), in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with an increased risk of disease flares, with limited information on the level of disease activity at the time of HCQ/CQ discontinuation. Here we aimed to describe the risk of SLE flare after withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission.

METHODS

Case-control study (1:2) comparing the evolution of patients with SLE after HCQ/CQ withdrawal for antimalarial retinopathy (cases) with patients with SLE matched for sex, antimalarial treatment duration and age at SLE diagnosis, whose antimalarial treatment was continued throughout the entire follow-up period (controls). To be included in the study, patients had to be in remission for at least one year according to the DORIS classification. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patient experiencing a flare according to the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index after a 36-month follow-up.

RESULTS

We studied 48 cases and 96 controls. The proportion of patients experiencing a flare was significantly higher in the HCQ/CQ withdrawal group as compared to the maintenance group (15 [31.3%] patients versus 12 [12.5%]; OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.2-8.2], P=0.01). Withdrawal of HCQ/CQ was inferior with respect to occurrence of severe SLE flare (12 [25.0%] vs 11 [11.5%]; OR 2.5 [95%CI 0.9-6.9], P=0.053) and time to first flare (HR 6.3 [2.0-19.9], P<0.005). Elevated serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies were identified as a risk factor for SLE flare following HCQ/CQ discontinuation (HR 5.4 [1.5-18.7], P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal of HCQ or CQ in patients with SLE in remission is associated with a 3-fold increased risk of relapse.

Management of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review informing the 2023 update of the EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the new evidence (2018-2022) for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) to inform the 2023 update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were performed in the Medline and the Cochrane Library databases capturing publications from 1 January 2018 through 31 December 2022, according to the EULAR standardised operating procedures. The research questions focused on five different domains, namely the benefit/harm of SLE treatments, the benefits from the attainment of remission/low disease activity, the risk/benefit from treatment tapering/withdrawal, the management of SLE with antiphospholipid syndrome and the safety of immunisations against varicella zoster virus and SARS-CoV2 infection. A Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome framework was used to develop search strings for each research topic.

RESULTS

We identified 439 relevant articles, the majority being observational studies of low or moderate quality. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) documented the efficacy of the type 1 interferon receptor inhibitor, anifrolumab, in non-renal SLE, and belimumab and voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor, in lupus nephritis (LN), when compared with standard of care. For the treatment of specific organ manifestations outside LN, a lack of high-quality data was documented. Multiple observational studies confirmed the beneficial effects of attaining clinical remission or low disease activity, reducing the risk for multiple adverse outcomes. Two randomised trials with some concerns regarding risk of bias found higher rates of relapse in patients who discontinued glucocorticoids (GC) or immunosuppressants in SLE and LN, respectively, yet observational cohort studies suggest that treatment withdrawal might be feasible in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSION

Anifrolumab and belimumab achieve better disease control than standard of care in extrarenal SLE, while combination therapies with belimumab and voclosporin attained higher response rates in high-quality RCTs in LN. Remission and low disease activity are associated with favourable long-term outcomes. In patients achieving these targets, GC and immunosuppressive therapy may gradually be tapered. Cite Now.

Immune-mediating and immunosuppressive pharmacotherapies for proliferative lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION

Proliferative lupus nephritis is a common and severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Affected patients are at an increased risk of developing chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and extra-renal comorbidities. In recent years, the prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis has improved thanks to advancements in management regimens. Despite these advances, lupus nephritis continues to present therapeutic complexities and unmet needs.

AREAS COVERED

Research was conducted across major databases to identify the most relevant articles pertaining to immune-mediating and immunosuppressive therapies in lupus nephritis.

EXPERT OPINION

The prognosis for patients with proliferative lupus nephritis remains severe. Some drugs used in this disease may be unable to control activity, and most of them have a low therapeutic index and may cause severe and life-threatening side effects. Nonetheless, better management of traditional drugs and the introduction of novel therapies have improved renal prognosis and reduced local and systemic adverse events in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

Lupus Nephritis Outcomes after Stopping Immunosuppression

Background/Objectives: Immunosuppression (IS) is a standard therapy for lupus nephritis (LN). Data on the outcomes of patients with LN after the discontinuation of immunosuppression remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and results of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) who ceased immunosuppressive (IS) therapy. Methods: Records were obtained on the clinical and laboratory features of LN patients who were treated at our Lupus Unit. They included median values and ranges for various numerical variables such as patient age, disease duration, and treatment duration. Categorical variables such as gender, LN class, IS treatment type, and patient outcomes, which were categorized as either "stable" or "flare experienced", were presented as percentages and frequencies. A flare in LN was characterized by a two-fold increase in serum creatinine levels and a rise in proteinuria following the cessation of IS medication. Results: Outcomes were assessed for 45 patients with LN who ceased IS therapy after achieving remission. The patients' median age was 55 years (29-78). The median duration of treatment was 4 years (0.5-14). The LN histology distribution was class V = 24.4%, class IV = 17.8 %, class III = 17.8%, class III + IV = 15.6%, class III + V = 6.7%, class IV + V = 2.2%, and class II + IV and II = 2.2%. At the discontinuation of IS treatment, creatinine levels were elevated in 9/45 (20%) patients. Furthermore, 28.9% of patients relapsed after IS treatment discontinuation. Patients with anti-Smith antibodies (anti-Sm) were observed to have a higher occurrence of relapses, with six patients experiencing flare compared to four patients who remained stable (p = 0.03). Five (38.5%) of the patients with flares had high creatinine levels after IS discontinuation. Conclusions: Most of our patients maintained clinical remission and stable levels of LN parameters after IS treatment discontinuation. Those with a high serum creatinine level, ongoing proteinuria, depleted complement levels, and the presence of anti-Sm antibodies were more likely to experience flares after the discontinuation of IS therapy.

Effect of Sustained Clinical Remission on the Risk of Lupus Flares and Impaired Kidney Function in Patients With Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

This retrospective study on patients with biopsy-proven lupus nephritis (LN) aimed to assess the probability of sustained clinical remission (sCR) and to investigate sCR effects on disease flares and impaired kidney function (IKF).

Methods

sCR was defined as clinical-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) = 0 and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 lasting ≥1 year; IKF: eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 for >3 months. We analyzed the probability of achieving and maintaining sCR, and the yearly risk of flare. Cox models were used to identify predictors of sCR and IKF with variables analyzed as time-dependent covariates when appropriate.

Results

Of 303 patients followed-up with for 14.8 (interquartile range: 9.8-22) years, 257 (84.8%) achieved sCR. The probability of achieving sCR progressively increased over time reaching 90% at 15 years. Baseline age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.017; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.005-1.029; P = 0.004), hydroxychloroquine intake (HR: 1.385; 95% CI: 1.051-1.825; P = 0.021), and absence of arterial hypertension (HR: 0.699; 95% CI: 0.532-0.921; P = 0.011) were independent predictors of sCR. Among patients who achieved sCR, 142 (55.3%) developed a lupus flare after a median time of 3.6 (2.3-5.9) years. In the remaining 115 patients, sCR persisted for 9.5 (5.8-14.5) years. The probability of sCR to persist at 15 years was 38%. SLE flare risk decreased to 10%, 5%, and 2% in patients with sCR lasting <5, 5 to 10, and >10 years, respectively. At the last observation, 57 patients (18.81%) had IKF. sCR achievement (HR: 0.18, P < 0.001) and its duration (HR: 0.83, P < 0.001) were protective against IKF.

Conclusion

sCR is an achievable target in LN management and protects against IKF. The longer the sCR, the higher the chance of its persistence and the lower the risk of SLE flares.

Belimumab and antimalarials combined against renal flares in patients treated for extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 4 phase III clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of antimalarial agents (AMA) and different doses and pharmaceutical forms of belimumab on preventing renal flares in patients with SLE treated for extra-renal disease.

METHODS

We pooled data from the BLISS-52, BLISS-76, BLISS-SC and BLISS-Northeast Asia trials of belimumab (n = 3225), that included patients with active SLE yet no severe ongoing nephritis. Participants were allocated to receive intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg, intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg, subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg, or placebo in addition to standard therapy. We estimated hazards of renal flare development throughout the study follow-up (52-76 weeks) using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 192 patients developed a renal flare after a median of 197 days. Compared with placebo, the risk of renal flares was lower among patients receiving intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.92; P = 0.018) and intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.22, 0.79; P = 0.007), while no significant association was found for subcutaneous belimumab 200 mg. AMA use yielded a lower hazard of renal flares (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.78; P < 0.001). The protection conferred was enhanced when belimumab and AMA were co-administered; the lowest flare rate was observed for the combination intravenous belimumab 1 mg/kg and AMA (18.5 cases per 1000 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The protection conferred from belimumab against renal flare development in patients treated for extra-renal SLE appears enhanced when belimumab was administered along with AMA. The prominent effect of low-dose belimumab warrants investigation of the efficacy of intermediate belimumab doses.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

BLISS-52: NCT00424476; BLISS-76: NCT00410384; BLISS-SC: NCT01484496; BLISS-NEA: NCT01345253.

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence.

METHODS

An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion.

Is per-protocol kidney biopsy required in lupus nephritis?

Baseline kidney biopsy is recommended in lupus nephritis (LN). Biopsy allows to classify different forms of LN and differentiate other forms of renal involvement, such as tubulo-interstitial nephritis or thrombotic microangiopathy. The indications for repeat biopsy are more controversial. Some authors feel that good clinical monitoring is sufficient to assess prognosis and make therapeutic decisions. Based on the recently demonstrated discordance between clinical and histological response, some physicians recommend per-protocol biopsies either at 6 months in stable patients to verify the response to induction therapy, or after one-to-two years to assess treatment efficacy and tune the duration of maintenance therapy. Others recommend repeating kidney biopsy in case of incomplete response or to discriminate between active and chronic lesions. By definition, a per-protocol kidney biopsy differs from a repeat biopsy in that the former is foreseen at fixed timepoints, regardless of the clinical response. Although any decision should always consider the patient's overall clinical condition, there are no doubts that repeat kidney biopsy represents a useful tool in difficult cases to evaluate treatment response, modulate treatment intensity, and predict long-term renal outcome both in quiescent lupus and during flares. How to harmonize per-protocol biopsies in the LN course remains challenging.

Successful glucocorticoid withdrawal in Chinese lupus nephritis patients: A single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the proportion of patients successfully withdrawn from glucocorticoids (GC) in a longitudinal cohort of patients with lupus nephritis over a period of 20 years, clinical and pathological predictors of patients with GC withdrawal and renal outcomes after GC withdrawal were further explored.

METHODS

Patients with successful GC withdrawal were identified for the cohort, and the following data were collected: demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, pathological findings at disease onset, flares, and renal outcomes subsequent to GC withdrawal.

RESULTS

There were 365 patients with lupus nephritis included with a median follow-up of 109.5 (83.5,165.3) months in our cohort. A total of 21 patients (5.8 %) achieved successful GC discontinuation, with a median duration of 7.5 (3,10) years necessary for GC withdrawal. The average duration of GC reduction from 7.5 mg/d to complete withdrawal lasted for approximately 25 months (18,30). Patients in the GC-withdrawal group had a lower prevalence of nephrotic syndrome (NS) at onset (28.5 % vs. 47.3 %, P = 0.035), a higher prevalence of positive anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibody (85.7 % vs. 61.6 %, P = 0.028) and more severe endocapillary hypercellularity in the renal histopathology evaluations (3(2.5,3) vs. 3(2,3), P = 0.022). NS at disease onset was an independent risk factor to predict unachievable GC withdrawal (OR 0.296, 95 % CI (0.104,0.842), P = 0.022) by multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 34 (20,42) months, none of these patients had flares after GC withdrawal.

CONCLUSIONS

The discontinuation of GC therapy in LN patients with complete remission and a stable treatment regimen for at least 5 years was feasible without an increased risk of flares, ESKD or death. Low-dose GC withdrawal necessitates a prolonged duration of time and meticulous monitoring.

Evolution of diagnosis and treatment for lupus nephritis in Spain

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus that can lead to end-stage renal disease. Many clinical and prognostic data on which our therapeutic decisions are based come from international cohorts, which have important ethnic and prognostic differences. To identify clinical and prognostic data from patients with LN in Spain, we undertook a bibliographic search of NL-related papers by Spanish authors and published in national and international journals between 2005 and 2022. According to the selected references, renal biopsy is not only essential for LN diagnosis but its repetition can be useful for the follow-up. Regarding LN treatment, standard strategy consists of an induction phase and a maintenance phase. However, as new drugs have been released, a new paradigm of treatment in a single, continuing and personalized phase has been proposed.

Hydroxychloroquine in nephrology: current status and future directions

Hydroxychloroquine is one of the oldest disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in clinical use. The drug interferes with lysosomal activity and antigen presentation, inhibits autophagy, and decreases transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Owing to its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic effect, hydroxychloroquine has been an integral part of therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis for several decades. The therapeutic versatility of hydroxychloroquine has led to repurposing it for other clinical conditions, with recent studies showing reduction in proteinuria in IgA nephropathy. Research is also underway to investigate the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in primary membranous nephropathy, Alport's syndrome, systemic vasculitis, anti-GBM disease, acute kidney injury and for cardiovascular risk reduction in chronic kidney disease. Hydroxychloroquine is well-tolerated, inexpensive, and widely available and therefore, should its indications expand in the future, it would certainly be welcomed. However, clinicians should be aware of the risk of irreversible and progressive retinal toxicity and rarely, cardiomyopathy. Monitoring hydroxychloroquine levels in blood appears to be a promising tool to evaluate compliance, individualize the dose and reduce the risk of retinal toxicity, although this is not yet standard clinical practice. In this review, we discuss the existing knowledge regarding the mechanism of action of hydroxychloroquine, its utility in lupus nephritis and other kidney diseases, the main adverse effects and the evidence gaps that need to be addressed in future research. Created with Biorender.com. HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; mDC, myeloid dendritic cell; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TLR, toll-like receptor.

Medication Cost Concerns and Disparities in Patient-Reported Outcomes Among a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Concerns about the affordability of medications are common in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the relationship between medication cost concerns and health outcomes is poorly understood. We assessed the association of self-reported medication cost concerns and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a multiethnic SLE cohort.

METHODS

The California Lupus Epidemiology Study is a cohort of individuals with physician-confirmed SLE. Medication cost concerns were defined as having difficulties affording SLE medications, skipping doses, delaying refills, requesting lower-cost alternatives, purchasing medications outside the United States, or applying for patient assistance programs. Linear regression and mixed effects models assessed the cross-sectional and longitudinal association of medication cost concerns and PROs, respectively, adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, principal insurance, immunomodulatory medications, and organ damage.

RESULTS

Of 334 participants, medication cost concerns were reported by 91 (27%). Medication cost concerns were associated with worse Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ; beta coefficient [β] 5.9, 95% CI 4.3-7.6; P < 0.001), 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8; β 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-4.0; P < 0.001), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS; β for physical function -4.6, 95% CI -6.7 to -2.4; P < 0.001) scores after adjusting for covariates. Medication cost concerns were not associated with significant changes in PROs over 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

More than a quarter of participants reported at least 1 medication cost concern, which was associated with worse PROs. Our results reveal a potentially modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes rooted in the unaffordability of SLE care.

Weaning Maintenance Therapy in Lupus Nephritis: For Whom, When, and How?

Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the main determinants of the severity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). LN flares can lead to organ damage with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or even end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and impair patients' survival. The "treat-to-target" strategy, which aims at obtaining and maintaining remission or low disease activity of SLE to alleviate symptoms and prevent organ damage, also refers to the control of residual activity in the kidney. But damage in SLE can also come from treatments, and toxicities related to long-term use of treatments should be prevented. This may contribute to the frequent nonadherence in patients with SLE. The de-escalation or even weaning of treatments whenever possible, or "think-to-untreat" (T2U) strategy, is to be considered in patients with LN. This possibility of treatment weaning in LN was explored in retrospective cohorts, on the basis of long-term clinical remission. It was also proposed prospectively with a kidney-biopsy-based approach, combining clinical and pathologic remission to secure treatment weaning. The WIN-Lupus trial was the first randomized controlled trial comparing the continuation to the discontinuation of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy (IST) after 2 to 3 years in patients with LN in remission. It showed a higher risk of severe SLE flares in patients who discontinued treatment, but also a possibility of weaning without flare in some patients, who need to be better identified. We propose here a narrative review of the available literature on the weaning of treatment in LN and discuss how to secure a T2U strategy.

Weaning of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis (WIN-Lupus): results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Severe (proliferative) forms of LN are treated with induction immunosuppressive therapy (IST), followed by maintenance IST, to target remission and avoid relapses. The optimal duration of maintenance IST is unknown. The WIN-Lupus trial tested whether IST discontinuation after 2‒3 years was non-inferior to IST continuation for two more years in proliferative LN.

METHODS

WIN-Lupus was an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients receiving maintenance IST with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for 2-3 years, and hydroxychloroquine, were randomised (1:1) into two groups: (1) IST continuation and (2) IST discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the relapse rate of proliferative LN at 24 months. Main secondary endpoints were the rate of severe SLE flares, survival without renal relapse or severe flare, adverse events.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2016, 96 patients (out of 200 planned) were randomised in WIN-Lupus: IST continuation group (n=48), IST discontinuation group (n=48). Relapse of proliferative LN occurred in 5/40 (12.5%) patients with IST continuation and in 12/44 (27.3%) patients with IST discontinuation (difference 14.8% (95% CI -1.9 to 31.5)). Non-inferiority was not demonstrated for relapse rate; time to relapse did not differ between the groups. Severe SLE flares (renal or extrarenal) were less frequent in patients with IST continuation (5/40 vs 14/44 patients; p=0.035). Adverse events did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-inferiority of maintenance IST discontinuation after 2‒3 years was not demonstrated for renal relapse. IST discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of severe SLE flares.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01284725.

Caveats and pitfalls in defining low disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

The treat-to-target strategy has been recently suggested in the management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and Definitions Of Remission In SLE (DORIS) remission were outlined as two concentric targets. The achievement of LLDAS was shown to be associated with lower frequency of SLE flare, decreased damage progression, better quality of life, and reduced mortality. In addition, LLDAS has successfully been tested in post-hoc analyses of a number of randomized controlled trials. However, it has been recently underlined that LLDAS includes a high proportion of patients in remission, raising the question if these endpoints are sufficiently distinct to consider their separation clinically relevant. Some studies suggest that the protective effect of LLDAS on damage might be due to the inclusion of patients who are in remission. Notably, clinical low disease activity (LDA) seems to be uncommon in SLE due to the relapsing-remitting pattern of the disease, in which low level of activity only occurs transiently. Moreover, since the domains included in LLDAS have several limitations, such as the use of a binomial disease activity index, the exclusion of some mild manifestations and the consideration of items subjected to variability (physician global assessment and glucocorticoids dose), not all patients in LDA are adequately represented by LLDAS.

When and How Is It Possible to Stop Therapy in Patients with Lupus Nephritis: A Narrative Review

Glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressants still represent the cornerstone drugs for the management of SLE and lupus nephritis. The refined use of these drugs over the years has allowed us to obtain stable disease remission and improvement of long-term kidney and patient survival. Nevertheless, a prolonged use of immunosuppressive agents may be accompanied by severe and even life-threatening side effects. Theoretically, a transient or even definitive withdrawal of immunosuppression could be useful to prevent iatrogenic morbidities. For many years, however, the risk of SLE reactivation has held clinicians back from trying to interrupt therapy. In this review, we report the results of the attempts to interrupt glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents in lupus nephritis and in SLE. The available data suggest that therapy withdrawal is feasible at least in patients enjoying a complete clinical remission after a prolonged therapy. A slow and gradual reduction of treatment under medical surveillance is needed to prevent flares of activity. After therapy withdrawal, around one-quarter of patients may have kidney or systemic flares. However, most flares may respond to therapy if rapidly diagnosed. The other patients can enter stable remission for even 20 years or more. The use of antimalarials can help in maintaining the remission after the withdrawal of the immunosuppressive therapy. A repeated kidney biopsy could be of help in deciding to stop therapy, but given the few available data, it cannot be considered essential.

Predicting lupus low disease activity state and remission in SLE: novel insights

Introduction:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with extreme heterogeneity, which sometimes may be life-threatening. Principles of treat to target (T2T) in SLE were put forward more recently, leading to better long-term survival and reduced damage accrual.Areas covered: Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) and remission are currently the most widely accepted principal goals of SLE-T2T recommendations. In this article, we will deliver the novel insights into the definitions of LLDAS/remission, attainability, and, most importantly, clinical predictors of LLDAS and remission in SLE.Expert opinion: Since the release of the LLDAS and the framework on definitions of remission in SLE, there has been much evidence of a correlation between target attainment or maintenance and better prognosis. In the meantime, researchers are searching for predictors of target attainment. Noteworthy, prospective randomized trials are lacking worldwide to verify the benefits of T2T in various aspects of SLE. The most essential issue is that the optimal definition of the therapeutic target for SLE remains controversial, particularly regarding the maintenance dose of prednisone, the need for immunosuppressive withdrawal, and the requirement for serologic conversion. How to implement T2T principles in clinical practice also needs further investigation.