Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Dapirolizumab Pegol in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Targeting TNF/TNFR superfamilies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Dysregulated signaling from TNF and TNFR proteins is implicated in several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This review centers around seven IMIDs (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and asthma) with substantial unmet medical needs and sheds light on the signaling mechanisms, disease relevance, and evolving drug development activities for five TNF/TNFR signaling axes that garner substantial drug development interest in these focus conditions. The review also explores the current landscape of therapeutics, emphasizing the limitations of the approved biologics, and the opportunities presented by small-molecule inhibitors and combination antagonists of TNF/TNFR signaling.

Switching off autoimmunity

Discovered 30 years ago, CD40L antagonists are proving to be powerful autoimmune drugs.

Development of an immunoassay for quantification of soluble human CD40L (CD154) in plasma and serum samples

When the membrane protein CD40 ligand (CD40L) on activated T cells binds the receptor CD40 on B-cells, it provides a co-stimulatory signal for B cell activation. Dysregulation of the CD40L:CD40 axis is associated with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The presence of soluble CD40L (sCD40L) in plasma is implicated in several diseases, from cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases to different types of cancer, and sCD40L has been suggested as a valuable marker of disease. If sCD40L is to be used as a biomarker, being able to precisely measure and quantify the levels of sCD40L in human blood samples is of utmost importance. We demonstrate the development of a sandwich-type time-resolved immunofluorometric assay for quantification of sCD40L in plasma or serum samples. For this, we generate 29 monoclonal anti-CD40L antibodies, and from these, we select the optimal combination of capture antibody and detection antibody. A number of variables were tested: the influence of the type of sample (comparing 3 different blood collection tubes for serum sampling and 4 different types of tubes for plasma sampling), the influence of freeze-thaw cycles, the influence of sampling time during night and day, and the influence of centrifugation of the samples. We found a very similar level of sCD40L in paired EDTA plasma and serum samples. Out of 100 healthy blood donor samples 61 had a level of sCD40L below the detection level of the assay, whereas the remaining 39 samples had ranging levels of sCD40L from 1.14 to 33.14 ng/mL. In summary, we present a time-resolved immunofluorometric assay based on paired monoclonal antibodies, ensuring high specificity, sensitivity, and homogeneity. The Eu3+-based assay additionally provides consistent assay readouts due to the extended decay time not seen in standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The assay paves the way for specific and consistent quantification of sCD40L in human plasma and serum samples.

Sequential immunotherapy: towards cures for autoimmunity

Despite major progress in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in the past two decades, most therapies do not cure disease and can be associated with increased risk of infection through broad suppression of the immune system. However, advances in understanding the causes of autoimmune disease and clinical data from novel therapeutic modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies provide evidence that it may be possible to re-establish immune homeostasis and, potentially, prolong remission or even cure autoimmune diseases. Here, we propose a 'sequential immunotherapy' framework for immune system modulation to help achieve this ambitious goal. This framework encompasses three steps: controlling inflammation; resetting the immune system through elimination of pathogenic immune memory cells; and promoting and maintaining immune homeostasis via immune regulatory agents and tissue repair. We discuss existing drugs and those in development for each of the three steps. We also highlight the importance of causal human biology in identifying and prioritizing novel immunotherapeutic strategies as well as informing their application in specific patient subsets, enabling precision medicine approaches that have the potential to transform clinical care.

An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Disrupting B and T-cell collaboration in autoimmune disease: T-cell engagers versus CAR T-cell therapy?

B and T cells collaborate to drive autoimmune disease (AID). Historically, B- and T-cell (B-T cell) co-interaction was targeted through different pathways such as alemtuzumab, abatacept, and dapirolizumab with variable impact on B-cell depletion (BCD), whereas the majority of patients with AID including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and organ transplantation benefit from targeted BCD with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab, ocrelizumab, or ofatumumab. Refractory AID is a significant problem for patients with incomplete BCD with a greater frequency of IgD-CD27+ switched memory B cells, CD19+CD20- B cells, and plasma cells that are not directly targeted by anti-CD20 antibodies, whereas most lymphoid tissue plasma cells express CD19. Furthermore, B-T-cell collaboration is predominant in lymphoid tissues and at sites of inflammation such as the joint and kidney, where BCD may be inefficient, due to limited access to key effector cells. In the treatment of cancer, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and T-cell engagers (TCE) that recruit T cells to induce B-cell cytotoxicity have delivered promising results for anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapies, the CD19 TCE blinatumomab and CD20 TCE such as mosunetuzumab, glofitamab, or epcoritamab. Limited evidence suggests that anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy may be effective in managing refractory AID whereas we await evaluation of TCE for use in non-oncological indications. Therefore, here, we discuss the potential mechanistic advantages of novel therapies that rely on T cells as effector cells to disrupt B-T-cell collaboration toward overcoming rituximab-resistant AID.

Interferon Inhibition in SLE: From Bench to Bedside

Despite advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), it remains a chronic disease with frequent flares, requiring constant medical care, laboratory exams, hospitalisations, and the use of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids, increasing the morbidity and mortality of these patients. The past decade of research has brought to light multiple observations on the role of interferons (IFNs) in the pathogenesis of SLE, which paved the way for the development of potential novel therapies targeting the interferon pathway. Following two phase III trials, anifrolumab, a monoclonal antibody which binds to the type I IFN receptor, blocking the activity of type I IFNs, was approved for active SLE. This review summarises the latest research on the role and mechanisms of type I IFNs in SLE and the development and advances on new therapeutic drugs based on IFN inhibition for SLE.

New and emerging therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis treatment is still based on non-specific immune suppression despite the first biological therapy for the disease having been approved more than a decade ago. Intense basic and translational research has uncovered a multitude of pathways that are actively being evaluated as treatment targets in SLE and lupus nephritis, with two new medications receiving FDA approval in the last 3 years. Herein we provide an overview of targeted therapies for SLE including medications targeting the B lymphocyte compartment, intracellular signaling, co-stimulation, and finally the interferons and other cytokines.

Emerging biologic therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The approval of belimumab and anifrolumab has expanded the scope of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. However, many patients remain refractory to currently available therapies and suffer from drug toxicities. This review will discuss approved and target-specific therapeutics in development that bring hope for better SLE treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the last review on this subject in the journal, the FDA has approved anifrolumab and belimumab for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN), respectively. A fully humanized anti-CD20, obinutuzumab, met the primary end point in a phase II trial in LN. A Tyk2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, and an antibody targeting plasmacytoid dendritic cells, litifilimab, met the primary end point in phase II trials in SLE and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Ustekinumab and baricitinib met the primary end point in phase II but not in phase III trials.

SUMMARY

While many drug candidates which met the end points in phase II trials have failed phase III trials, the number of target-specific therapies for SLE has continued to expand.

Inhibition of CD40L with Frexalimab in Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The CD40-CD40L costimulatory pathway regulates adaptive and innate immune responses and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Frexalimab is a second-generation anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody being evaluated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 4:4:1:1 ratio, participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive 1200 mg of frexalimab administered intravenously every 4 weeks (with an 1800-mg loading dose), 300 mg of frexalimab administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks (with a 600-mg loading dose), or the matching placebos for each active treatment. The primary end point was the number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions seen on magnetic resonance imaging at week 12 relative to week 8. Secondary end points included the number of new or enlarging T2-weighted lesions at week 12 relative to week 8, the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions at week 12, and safety. After 12 weeks, all the participants could receive open-label frexalimab.

RESULTS

Of 166 participants screened, 129 were assigned to a trial group; 125 participants (97%) completed the 12-week double-blind period. The mean age of the participants was 36.6 years, 66% were women, and 30% had gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline. At week 12, the adjusted mean number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions was 0.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1 to 0.4) in the group that received 1200 mg of frexalimab intravenously and 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.6) in the group that received 300 mg of frexalimab subcutaneously, as compared with 1.4 (95% CI, 0.6 to 3.0) in the pooled placebo group. The rate ratios as compared with placebo were 0.11 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.38) in the 1200-mg group and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.56) in the 300-mg group. Results for the secondary imaging end points were generally in the same direction as those for the primary analysis. The most common adverse events were coronavirus disease 2019 and headaches.

CONCLUSIONS

In a phase 2 trial involving participants with multiple sclerosis, inhibition of CD40L with frexalimab had an effect that generally favored a greater reduction in the number of new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions at week 12 as compared with placebo. Larger and longer trials are needed to determine the long-term efficacy and safety of frexalimab in persons with multiple sclerosis. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04879628.).

[Immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus]

Insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) help to understand the complex disease patterns and to develop new treatment strategies. The disease manifestations essentially result from autoantibodies, immune complexes and cytokines. Particularly the propensity towards developing various autoantibodies is central to the disease itself; autoantibody specificities lead to highly variable organ manifestations. This review article delineates the clinically relevant state of knowledge on SLE pathogenesis, with the goal to establish a model useful for clinical practice, which also helps to classify the novel therapeutic approaches.

PEGylated therapeutics in the clinic

The covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to therapeutic agents, termed PEGylation, is a well-established and clinically proven drug delivery approach to improve the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Specifically, PEGylation can improve the parent drug's solubility, extend its circulation time, and reduce its immunogenicity, with minimal undesirable properties. PEGylation technology has been applied to various therapeutic modalities including small molecules, aptamers, peptides, and proteins, leading to over 30 PEGylated drugs currently used in the clinic and many investigational PEGylated agents under clinical trials. Here, we summarize the diverse types of PEGylation strategies, the key advantages of PEGylated therapeutics over their parent drugs, and the broad applications and impacts of PEGylation in clinical settings. A particular focus has been given to the size, topology, and functionalities of PEG molecules utilized in clinically used PEGylated drugs, as well as those under clinical trials. An additional section has been dedicated to analyzing some representative PEGylated drugs that were discontinued at different stages of clinical studies. Finally, we critically discuss the current challenges faced in the development and clinical translation of PEGylated agents.

Emerging immunotherapeutic strategies for cutaneous lupus erythematosus: an overview of recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune disease that is clinically heterogenous and may occur with or without the presence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). While existing on a spectrum, CLE and SLE present differences in their underlying pathogenesis and therapeutic responses. No new therapies have been approved in recent decades by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for CLE, although frequently refractory to conventional therapies. There is an unmet need to develop effective drugs for CLE as it significantly impacts patients' quality of life and may leave irreversible disfiguring damage.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an update on the latest phase 2 and 3 clinical trials performed in CLE or SLE using skin-specific outcome measures. Emergent therapies are presented alongside their mechanism of action as recent translational studies have permitted identification of critical targets among immune cells and/or pathways involved in CLE.

EXPERT OPINION

While the recent literature has few trials for CLE, drugs targeting type I interferon, its downstream signaling and plasmacytoid dendritic cells have shown promising results. Further research is required to develop long-awaited effective therapies, and this review highlights the importance of implementing trials dedicated to CLE to fill the current gap in CLE therapeutics.

Immunotherapeutic approaches for systemic lupus erythematosus: early overview and future potential

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease. Current SLE therapies include immunosuppressants, antimalarial drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroids, but these treatments can cause substantial toxicities to organs and may not be effective for all patients. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the treatment of SLE using immunotherapy, including Benlysta and Saphnelo. These advances in immunotherapy hold promise for SLE patients, providing new therapeutic options that may offer better clinical benefit and effectiveness. Simultaneously, several new biological therapies focusing on cytokines, peptides, targeted antibodies, and cell-based approaches are under clinical evaluation and have shown immense potential for the treatment of SLE. However, the complexity of SLE immunopathogenesis and disease heterogeneity present significant challenges in the development of effective immunological therapies. This review aims to discuss past experiences and understanding of diverse immunological targeting therapies for SLE and highlight future perspectives for the development of novel immunological therapies.

First-in-Human Phase 1 Randomized Trial with the Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody KPL-404: Safety, Tolerability, Receptor Occupancy, and Suppression of T-Cell-Dependent Antibody Response

Blockade of the cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40)-CD40L interaction has potential for treating autoimmune diseases and preventing graft rejection. This first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04497662) evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy, and pharmacodynamics of the humanized anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody KPL-404. Healthy volunteers were randomized to one of two single-ascending-dose groups: single intravenous KPL-404 dose 0.03, 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg or single subcutaneous KPL-404 dose 1 or 5 mg/kg. There were no dose-limiting or dose-related safety findings. Nonlinear dose-dependent changes in various pharmacokinetic parameters were identified following the range of intravenous doses. At the 10 mg/kg intravenous dose level, the t1/2 was approximately 7 days, and full receptor occupancy was observed through Day 71, with complete suppression of T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) challenge on Day 1 and rechallenge on Day 29 through Day 57. With KPL-404 5 mg/kg subcutaneously, full receptor occupancy was observed through Day 43, with complete suppression of TDAR through at least Day 29. Antidrug antibodies to KPL-404 were suppressed for 57 days with 10 mg/kg intravenously and for 50 days with 5 mg/kg subcutaneously, further confirming prolonged target engagement and pharmacodynamics. These findings support continued investigation of KPL-404 intravenous and subcutaneous administration in a broad range of indications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This first-in-human clinical trial of KPL-404, a fully humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, was designed with two independent (by route of administration) placebo-controlled single-ascending-dose-level groups, one with four intravenous single-dose cohorts and another with two subcutaneous single-dose cohorts. The pharmacokinetic profile, duration of full CD40 receptor occupancy, and magnitude and duration of memory immune response suppression observed confirm pharmacodynamic activity regardless of administration route. These data provide evidence that chronic KPL-404 dosing regimens (intravenous or subcutaneous) could be practical.

Clinical advances in immunotherapy for immune-mediated glomerular diseases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Due to the suboptimal therapeutic efficacy and potential adverse effects associated with traditional immunosuppressive medications, there has been an increasing emphasis on the development and utilization of immunotherapies. This paper aims to provide clinicians with valuable insights for selecting appropriate therapeutic approaches and contribute to the development of novel immunotherapeutic drugs.

MAIN BODY

This paper categorizes the immunotherapeutic drugs that are used for the treatment of immune-mediated glomerular diseases into three groups: immunotherapies targeting antigen-presenting cells (anti-CD80), immunotherapies targeting T/B cells (anti-CD20, anti-CD22, BAFF and APRIL inhibitors, CD40-CD40L inhibitors, proteasome inhibitors, Syk inhibitors, and Btk inhibitors), and immunotherapies targeting the complement system (C5 inhibitors, C5a/C5aR inhibitors, C3 inhibitors, MASP2 inhibitors, factor B inhibitors, and factor D inhibitors). The article then provides a comprehensive overview of advances related to these immunotherapeutic drugs in clinical research.

CONCLUSION

Certain immunotherapeutic drugs, such as rituximab, belimumab, and eculizumab, have exhibited notable efficacy in treating specific immune-mediated glomerular diseases, thereby providing novel therapeutic approaches for patients. Nonetheless, the efficacy of numerous immunotherapeutic drugs remains to be substantiated.

New and future therapies: Changes in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE

Following better understanding of molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), pharmaceutical companies have been investigating new targeted drugs for SLE. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an updated view of the most promising targeted therapies currently in clinical development or recently approved for SLE treatment as well as of the most promising potential future therapeutic strategies in SLE. In the past several years, two new drugs have been developed for lupus treatment along with an extended indication for belimumab. Anifrolumab, the anti-interferon medication, to treat non-renal lupus; voclosporin, a calcineurin inhibitor, for the treatment of lupus nephritis; and belimumab for lupus nephritis. More than 90 investigational drugs are currently in clinical development for SLE treatment, with various targets including inflammatory cytokines and their receptors, intracellular signaling, B cells or plasma cells, co-stimulation molecules, complement fractions, T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells as well as various other immunological targets of interest. Researchers are also actively engaged in the development of new therapeutic strategies, including the use of monoclonal antibodies in combination with bispecific monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies and nanoparticles, therapeutic vaccines, utilizing siRNA interference techniques, autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and Chimeric Antigens Receptor (CAR)-T cells. The therapeutic management and prognosis of SLE have profoundly evolved with changes in the therapeutic armamentarium. With the broad pipeline of targeted treatments in clinical development and new treatment strategies in the future, current challenges are transitioning from the availability of new drugs to the selection of the most appropriate strategy at the patient level.

Advances in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a severe multisystem autoimmune disease that can cause injury in almost every body system. While considered a classic example of autoimmunity, it is still relatively poorly understood. Treatment with immunosuppressive agents is challenging, as many agents are relatively non-specific, and the underlying disease is characterized by unpredictable flares and remissions. This State of The Art Review provides a comprehensive current summary of systemic lupus erythematosus based on recent literature. In basic and translational science, this summary includes the current state of genetics, epigenetics, differences by ancestry, and updates about the molecular and immunological pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. In clinical science, the summary includes updates in diagnosis and classification, clinical features and subphenotypes, and current guidelines and strategies for treatment. The paper also provides a comprehensive review of the large number of recent clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus. Current knowns and unknowns are presented, and potential directions for the future are suggested. Improved knowledge of immunological pathogenesis and the molecular differences that exist between patients should help to personalize treatment, minimize side effects, and achieve better outcomes in this difficult disease.

Selection of indicators reporting response rate in pharmaceutical trials for systemic lupus erythematosus: preference and relative sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

SLE is a common multisystem autoimmune disease with chronic inflammation. Many efficacy evaluation indicators of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) for SLE have been proposed but the comparability remains unknown. We aim to explore the preference and comparability of indicators reporting response rate and provide basis for primary outcome selection when evaluating the efficacy of SLE pharmaceutical treatment.

METHODS

We systematically searched three databases and three registries to identify pharmacological intervention-controlled SLE RCTs. Relative discriminations between indicators were assessed by the Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model.

RESULTS

33 RCTs met our inclusion criteria and we compared eight of the most commonly used indicators reporting response rate. SLE Disease Activity Index 4 (SLEDAI-4) and SLE Responder Index 4 were considered the best recommended indicators reporting response rate to discriminate the pharmacological efficacy. Indicator preference was altered by disease severity, classification of drugs and outcome of trials, but SLEDAI-4 had robust efficacy in discriminating ability for most interventions. Of note, BILAG Index-based Combined Lupus Assessment showed efficacy in trials covering all-severity patients, as well as non-biologics RCTs. The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group response and Physician's Global Assessment response were more cautious in evaluating disease changes. Serious adverse event was often applied to evaluate the safety and tolerability of treatments rather than efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

The impressionable efficacy discrimination ability of indicators highlights the importance of flexibility and comprehensiveness when choosing primary outcome(s). As for trials that are only evaluated by SLEDAI-4, attention should be paid to outcome interpretation to avoid the exaggeration of treatment efficacy. Further subgroup analyses are limited by the number of included RCTs.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022334517.

B Cell Tolerance and Targeted Therapies in SLE

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease of high clinical and molecular heterogeneity, and a relapsing-remitting pattern. The disease is currently without cure and more prevalent in women. B cell tolerance and production of autoantibodies are critical mechanisms that drive SLE pathophysiology. However, how the balance of the immune system is broken and how the innate and adaptive immune systems are interacting during lupus-specific autoimmune responses are still largely unknown. Here, we review the latest knowledge on B cell development, maturation, and central versus peripheral tolerance in connection to SLE and treatment options. We also discuss the regulation of B cells by conventional T cells, granulocytes, and unconventional T cells, and how effector B cells exert their functions in SLE. We also discuss mechanisms of action of B cell-targeted therapies, as well as possible future directions based on current knowledge of B cell biology.

Novel Therapeutics for Management of Lupus Nephritis: What Is Next?

Lupus nephritis is a severe, organ-threatening manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. The current standard of care in the treatment of lupus nephritis is limited to broad-spectrum immunosuppressants, which have significant concerns of short- and long-term toxicity. With traditional approaches, kidney survival and patient outcomes have remained suboptimal. Robust research in the therapeutics of lupus nephritis has resulted in development of many novel drugs targeting specific inflammatory response pathways. Some newer agents have shown a definitive signal of benefit when added to standard of care. With the advent of precision medicine in nephrology, lupus nephritis treatment may undergo a shift toward incorporating approaches using these newer drugs and individualizing care of our patients. This review highlights major advances in management of lupus nephritis over the last 25 years and explores the ongoing trials of emerging therapies in lupus nephritis.

The role of platelets in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are characterized by excessive and uncontrolled inflammation and thrombosis, both of which are responsible for organ damage, morbidity and death. Platelets have long been known for their role in primary haemostasis, but they are now also considered to be components of the immune system and to have a central role in the pathogenesis of IMIDs. In patients with IMIDs, platelets are activated by disease-specific factors, and their activation often reflects disease activity. Here we summarize the evidence showing that activated platelets have an active role in the pathogenesis and the progression of IMIDs. Activated platelets produce soluble factors and directly interact with immune cells, thereby promoting an inflammatory phenotype. Furthermore, platelets participate in tissue injury and promote abnormal tissue healing, leading to fibrosis. Targeting platelet activation and targeting the interaction of platelets with the immune system are novel and promising therapeutic strategies in IMIDs.

Promising Experimental Treatments for Lupus Nephritis: Key Talking Points and Potential Opportunities

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), impairing patients' quality of life and significantly increasing mortality. Despite optimizing the use of conventional immunosuppressants and other biological drugs, its management remains unsatisfactory. This is mainly due to the heterogeneity of SLE, but also to insufficiently effective treatment regimens and clinical trial limitations (strict criteria, low number of patients included, and side effects). Most clinical trials of new biological therapies have failed to meet their primary endpoints in both general SLE and LN, with only two biological drugs (belimumab and anifrolumab) being approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of SLE. Recently, several Phase II randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in LN, and some of them have demonstrated an improvement in clinical and laboratory measures. Multi-target therapies are also being successfully developed and encourage a belief that there will be an improvement in LN outcomes.

Advances in natural products and antibody drugs for SLE: new therapeutic ideas

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune systemic disease with a wide range of clinical symptoms, complex development processes, and uncertain prognosis. The clinical treatment of SLE is mainly based on hormones and immunosuppressants. Research on novel therapy strategies for SLE has flourished in recent years, especially the emergence of new targeted drugs and natural products that can modulate related symptoms. This review discusses the current experience including B-cell targeted drugs (belimumab, tabalumab, blisibimod, atacicept, rituximab, ofatumumab, ocrelizumab, obexelimab, and epratuzumab), T-cell targeted drugs (abatacept, dapirolizumab, and inhibitor of syk and CaMKIV), cytokines targeted drugs (anifrolumab and sifalimumab), and natural products (curcumin, oleuropein, punicalagin, sulforaphane, icariin, apigenin, and resveratrol). The aim of this paper is to combine the existing in vitro and in vivo models and clinical research results to summarize the efficacy and mechanism of natural drugs and targeted drugs in SLE for the reference and consideration of researchers.

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: An Update on Pathogenesis and Future Therapeutic Directions

Lupus erythematosus comprises a spectrum of autoimmune diseases that may affect various organs (systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) or the skin only (cutaneous lupus erythematosus [CLE]). Typical combinations of clinical, histological and serological findings define clinical subtypes of CLE, yet there is high interindividual variation. Skin lesions arise in the course of triggers such as ultraviolet (UV) light exposure, smoking or drugs; keratinocytes, cytotoxic T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) establish a self-perpetuating interplay between the innate and adaptive immune system that is pivotal for the pathogenesis of CLE. Therefore, treatment relies on avoidance of triggers and UV protection, topical therapies (glucocorticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) and rather unspecific immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs. Yet, the advent of licensed targeted therapies for SLE might also open new perspectives in the management of CLE. The heterogeneity of CLE might be attributable to individual variables and we speculate that the prevailing inflammatory signature defined by either T cells, B cells, pDCs, a strong lesional type I interferon (IFN) response, or combinations of the above might be suitable to predict therapeutic response to targeted treatment. Therefore, pretherapeutic histological assessment of the inflammatory infiltrate could stratify patients with refractory CLE for T-cell-directed therapies (e.g. dapirolizumab pegol), B-cell-directed therapies (e.g. belimumab), pDC-directed therapies (e.g. litifilimab) or IFN-directed therapies (e.g. anifrolumab). Moreover, Janus kinase (JAK) and spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) inhibitors might broaden the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future. A close interdisciplinary exchange with rheumatologists and nephrologists is mandatory for optimal treatment of lupus patients to define the best therapeutic strategy.

Improving resource utilisation in SLE drug development through innovative trial design

SLE is a complex autoimmune disease with considerable unmet need. Numerous clinical trials designed to investigate novel therapies are actively enrolling patients straining limited resources and creating inefficiencies that increase enrolment challenges. This has motivated investigators developing novel drugs and treatment strategies to consider innovative trial designs that aim to improve the efficiency of generating evidence; these strategies propose conducting fewer trials, involving smaller numbers of patients, while maintaining scientific rigour in safety and efficacy data collection and analysis. In this review we present the design of two innovative phase IIb studies investigating efavaleukin alfa and rozibafusp alfa for the treatment of SLE which use an adaptive study design. This design was selected as a case study, investigating efavaleukin alfa, in the Food and Drug Administration's Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Program. The adaptive design approach includes prospectively planned modifications at predefined interim timepoints. Interim assessments of futility allow for a trial to end early when the investigational therapy is unlikely to provide meaningful treatment benefits to patients, which can release eligible patients to participate in other-potentially more promising-trials, or seek alternative treatments. Response-adaptive randomisation allows randomisation ratios to change based on accumulating data, in favour of the more efficacious dose arm(s), while the study is ongoing. Throughout the trial the placebo arm allocation ratio is maintained constant. These design elements can improve the statistical power in the estimation of treatment effect and increase the amount of safety and efficacy data collected for the optimal dose(s). Furthermore, these trials can provide the required evidence to potentially serve as one of two confirmatory trials needed for regulatory approval. This can reduce the need for multiple phase III trials, the total patient requirements, person-exposure risk, and ultimately the time and cost of investigational drug development programmes.

CD40-CD40L Blockade: Update on Novel Investigational Therapeutics for Transplantation

Effective immune responses require antigen presentation by major histocompatibility complexes with cognate T-cell receptor and antigen-independent costimulatory signaling for T-cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation. Among several costimulatory signals, CD40-CD40L is of special interest to the transplantation community because it plays a vital role in controlling or regulating humoral and cellular immunity. Blockade of this pathway has demonstrated inhibition of donor-reactive T-cell responses and prolonged the survival of transplanted organs. Several anti-CD154 and anti-CD40 antibodies have been used in the transplantation model and demonstrated the potential of extending allograft and xenograft rejection-free survival. The wide use of anti-CD154 antibodies was hampered because of thromboembolic complications in transplant recipients. These antibodies have been modified to overcome the thromboembolic complications by altering the antibody binding fragment (Fab) and Fc (fragment, crystallizable) receptor region for therapeutic purposes. Here, we review recent preclinical advances to target the CD40-CD40L pair in transplantation.

Targeted Therapy for SLE-What Works, What Doesn't, What's Next

For many years, the failure of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has prevented patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from benefiting from biological drugs that have proved to be effective in other rheumatological diseases. Only two biologics are approved for SLE, however they can only be administered to a restricted proportion of patients. Recently, several phase II RCTs have evaluated the efficacy and safety of new biologics in extra-renal SLE and lupus nephritis. Six drug trials have reported encouraging results, with an improvement in multiple clinical and serological outcome measures. The possibility of combining B-cell depletion and anti-BLyS treatment has also been successfully explored.

Biological therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and Sjögren's syndrome: evidence- and practice-based guidance

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and Sjögren's syndrome (SS) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases. Severe manifestations and refractory/intolerance to conventional immunosuppressants demand other options, namely biological drugs, and small molecules. We aimed to define evidence and practice-based guidance for the off-label use of biologics in SLE, APS, and SS. Recommendations were made by an independent expert panel, following a comprehensive literature review and two consensus rounds. The panel included 17 internal medicine experts with recognized practice in autoimmune disease management. The literature review was systematic from 2014 until 2019 and later updated by cross-reference checking and experts' input until 2021. Preliminary recommendations were drafted by working groups for each disease. A revision meeting with all experts anticipated the consensus meeting held in June 2021. All experts voted (agree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree) during two rounds, and recommendations with at least 75% agreement were approved. A total of 32 final recommendations (20 for SLE treatment, 5 for APS, and 7 for SS) were approved by the experts. These recommendations consider organ involvement, manifestations, severity, and response to previous treatments. In these three autoimmune diseases, most recommendations refer to rituximab, which aligns with the higher number of studies and clinical experience with this biological agent. Belimumab sequential treatment after rituximab may also be used in severe cases of SLE and SS. Second-line therapy with baricitinib, bortezomib, eculizumab, secukinumab, or tocilizumab can be considered in SLE-specific manifestations. These evidence and practice-based recommendations may support treatment decision and, ultimately, improve the outcome of patients living with SLE, APS, or SS.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response for Dapirolizumab Pegol From a Phase 2b Trial in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic, autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation and organ damage. Dapirolizumab pegol inhibits CD40 ligand (CD40L) and is currently undergoing phase 3 trials for the treatment of SLE. To describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of dapirolizumab pegol and the relationship between exposure and probability of achieving a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response, a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model and an exposure-response model were developed, based on results of the phase 2b trial (RISE; NCT02804763) of dapirolizumab pegol in SLE. Dapirolizumab pegol pharmacokinetics were found to be dose proportional and well described by a 2-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. In the popPK model, body weight was the only significant covariate. The average concentration of dapirolizumab pegol, derived from the popPK model, was incorporated into the exposure-response model. Overall, the exposure-response model showed that treatment with dapirolizumab pegol increased the probability of transitioning from BICLA "Nonresponder" to "Responder." No significant covariates on BICLA responder status were identified. Notably, the half maximal effective concentration was greater for the transition from "Responder" to "Nonresponder" (150 µg/mL) than the transition from "Nonresponder" to "Responder" (12 µg/mL), indicating that sustained dapirolizumab pegol concentrations may be required to maintain BICLA response. In conclusion, dapirolizumab pegol pharmacokinetics were as expected for a PEGylated molecule and results from the exposure-response model indicate that a favorable dapirolizumab pegol effect was identified for both BICLA "Nonresponder" to "Responder" and "Responder" to "Nonresponder" transition probabilities.

New biologics and targeted therapies in systemic lupus: From new molecular targets to new indications. A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite available therapies, persistently active and corticosteroid-dependent Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) represent a significant therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide an updated view of targeted therapies currently in clinical development in SLE, with a special focus on the most promising ones.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of targeted therapies in clinical development in SLE in clinicaltrials.gov (search date: 28th of August 2022). Targeted therapies (defined as drugs specifically designed to block certain molecules, receptors, or pathways involved in the development of SLE) were extracted. For each investigational drug, we considered only the study at the most advanced stage of clinical development.

RESULTS

The systematic review yielded a total of 92 targeted therapies (58 biological DMARDs [bDMARDs] and 34 targeted synthetic [ts]DMARDs) assessed in a total of 203 clinical trials. The candidate drugs reached phase I (n=20), Ia/IIb (n=6), phase II (n=51), phase II/III (n=1), phase III (n=13) and phase IV (n=1). These trials were reported as recruiting (n=31), active but not recruiting (n=8), not yet recruiting (n=4), enrolling by invitation (n=2), completed (n=31), prematurely terminated (n=12) and withdrawn in 1 (status unknown in 3). The main investigational drugs for SLE target inflammatory cytokines, chemokines or their receptors (n=19), intracellular signaling pathways (n=18), B cells (n=14) or plasma cells (n=7),T/B cells co-stimulation molecules (n=10), complement molecules (n=5),T lymphocytes (n=2), plasmacytoid dendritic cells (n=2), as well as various other immune targets (n=15).

CONCLUSION

The pipeline of investigational drugs in SLE is highly diversified and will hopefully enable more optimal Treat-To-Target with the goal of disease modification. Companion biomarkers will be needed to better characterized SLE heterogeneity and optimize treatment selection at the individual-patient level.

A Review of Protein- and Peptide-Based Chemical Conjugates: Past, Present, and Future

Over the past few decades, the complexity of molecular entities being advanced for therapeutic purposes has continued to evolve. A main propellent fueling innovation is the perpetual mandate within the pharmaceutical industry to meet the needs of novel disease areas and/or delivery challenges. As new mechanisms of action are uncovered, and as our understanding of existing mechanisms grows, the properties that are required and/or leveraged to enable therapeutic development continue to expand. One rapidly evolving area of interest is that of chemically enhanced peptide and protein therapeutics. While a variety of conjugate molecules such as antibody-drug conjugates, peptide/protein-PEG conjugates, and protein conjugate vaccines are already well established, others, such as antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates and peptide/protein conjugates using non-PEG polymers, are newer to clinical development. This review will evaluate the current development landscape of protein-based chemical conjugates with special attention to considerations such as modulation of pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and entry into difficult to access targets, as well as bioavailability. Furthermore, for the purpose of this review, the types of molecules discussed are divided into two categories: (1) therapeutics that are enhanced by protein or peptide bioconjugation, and (2) protein and peptide therapeutics that require chemical modifications. Overall, the breadth of novel peptide- or protein-based therapeutics moving through the pipeline each year supports a path forward for the pursuit of even more complex therapeutic strategies.

Clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus: the dilemma-Why have phase III trials failed to confirm the promising results of phase II trials?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease of unknown aetiology, characterised by the production of auto-antibodies and formation of immune complexes against self-antigens and complement activation. This inflammatory response can lead to tissue infiltration and eventually, to organ damage.Patients with SLE invariably have periods of relapse and remission. Flares can occur even when the patient is on seemingly adequate treatment, which suggests that more effective therapies are necessary for the management of SLE. Thus, trials with many drugs against different targets, such as CD22, IL-12 and IL-23 or tyrosine kinases, have been carried out in recent years.A frustrating feature of some of the biologic drugs used to treat SLE has been the reporting of successful phase II trials followed by failures of the phase III trials.In this review, we will focus on phase II and III trials carried out with epratuzumab (anti CD22), baricitinib (Janus kinases inhibitor), rigerimod (P140 peptide) and ustekinumab (IL-12 and IL-23 inhibitor) and consider the reasons for their ultimate failure to 'make the grade'. Likewise, we will try to explain the possible reasons that can influence why good results may be obtained in phase II trials and lead to undue optimism.

Targeting B cells and plasma cells in autoimmune diseases: From established treatments to novel therapeutic approaches

Autoimmune diseases are characterized by the recognition of self-antigens by the immune system, which leads to inflammation and tissue damage. B cells are directly and indirectly involved in the pathophysiology of autoimmunity, both via antigen-presentation to T cells and production of proinflammatory cytokines and/or autoantibodies. Consequently, B lineage cells have been identified as therapeutic targets in autoimmune diseases. B cell depleting strategies have proven beneficial in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), multiple sclerosis (MS), and a wide range of other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). However, not all patients respond to treatment or may not reach (drug-free) remission. Moreover, B cell depleting therapies do not always target all B cell subsets, such as short-lived and long-lived plasma cells. These cells play an active role in autoimmunity and in certain diseases their depletion would be beneficial to achieve disease remission. In the current review article, we provide an overview of novel strategies to target B lineage cells in autoimmune diseases, with the focus on rheumatic diseases. Both advanced therapies that have recently become available and more experimental treatments that may reach the clinic in the near future are discussed.

Targeting immune checkpoints in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies associated vasculitis: the potential therapeutic targets in the future

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) is a necrotizing vasculitis mainly involving small blood vessels. It is demonstrated that T cells are important in the pathogenesis of AAV, including regulatory T cells (Treg) and helper T cells (Th), especially Th2, Th17, and follicular Th cells (Tfh). In addition, the exhaustion of T cells predicted the favorable prognosis of AAV. The immune checkpoints (ICs) consist of a group of co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules expressed on the surface of T cells, which maintains a balance between the activation and exhaustion of T cells. CD28, inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS), OX40, CD40L, glucocorticoid induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR), and CD137 are the common co-stimulatory molecules, while the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule 4 (CTLA-4), T cell immunoglobulin (Ig) and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), V-domain Ig suppressor of T cell activation (VISTA), T-cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT), CD200, and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) belong to co-inhibitory molecules. If this balance was disrupted and the activation of T cells was increased, autoimmune diseases (AIDs) might be induced. Even in the treatment of malignant tumors, activation of T cells by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may result in AIDs known as rheumatic immune-related adverse events (Rh-irAEs), suggesting the importance of ICs in AIDs. In this review, we summarized the features of AAV induced by immunotherapy using ICIs in patients with malignant tumors, and then reviewed the biological characteristics of different ICs. Our aim was to explore potential targets in ICs for future treatment of AAV.

Immunological and translational key challenges in systemic lupus erythematosus: A symposium update

The first LBMR-Tim (Toulouse Referral Medical Laboratory of Immunology) symposium convened on December 16, 2022 in Toulouse, France to address challenging questions in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Special focus was put on (i) the role played by genes, sex, TLR7, and platelets on SLE pathophysiology; (ii) autoantibodies, urinary proteins, and thrombocytopenia contribution at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up; (iii) neuropsychiatric involvement, vaccine response in the COVID-19 era, and lupus nephritis management at the clinical frontline; and (iv) therapeutic perspectives in patients with lupus nephritis and the unexpected adventure of the Lupuzor/P140 peptide. The multidisciplinary panel of experts further supports the concept that a global approach including basic sciences, translational research, clinical expertise, and therapeutic development have to be prioritized in order to better understand and then improve the management of this complex syndrome.

Advances in lupus therapeutics: Achieving sustained control of the type I interferon pathway

Achieving sustained control of disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has been impeded by the complexity of its immunopathogenesis as well its clinical heterogeneity. In spite of these challenges, gains in understanding disease mechanisms have identified immune targets that are currently under study in trials of candidate therapeutics. Defining the type I interferon (IFN-I) pathway and autoantibodies specific for nucleic acid binding proteins as core pathogenic mediators allows an analysis of approaches that could control production of those mediators and improve patient outcomes. This review describes therapeutic targets and agents that could achieve control of the IFN-I pathway. Toll-like receptor 7, involved in IFN-I production and differentiation of B cells, and long-lived plasma cells, the producers of autoantibodies specific for RNA-binding proteins, components of the immune complex drivers of IFN-I, are particularly attractive therapeutic targets.

New insights in systemic lupus erythematosus: From regulatory T cells to CAR-T-cell strategies

Systemic lupus erythematous is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with potentially multiorgan damage. Its complex etiopathogenesis involves genetic, environmental, and hormonal factors, leading to a loss of self-tolerance with autoantibody production and immune complex formation. Given the relevance of autoreactive B lymphocytes, several therapeutic approaches have been made targeting these cells. However, the disease remains incurable, reflecting an unmet need for effective strategies. Novel therapeutic concepts have been investigated to provide more specific and sustainable disease modification compared with continued immunosuppression. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has already provided the proof-of-concept that immunodepletion can lead to durable treatment-free remissions, albeit with significant treatment-related toxicity. In the future, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapies, for example, CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T, may provide a more effective lymphodepletion and with less toxicity than autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. An emerging field is to enhance immune tolerance by exploiting the suppressive capacities of regulatory T cells, which are dysfunctional in patients with systemic lupus erythematous, and thus resemble promising candidates for adoptive cell therapy. Different approaches have been developed in this area, from polyclonal to genetically engineered regulatory T cells. In this article, we discuss the current evidence and future directions of cellular therapies for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematous, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and advanced regulatory T-cell-based cellular therapies.

Anti-C1q autoantibodies from systemic lupus erythematosus patients enhance CD40-CD154-mediated inflammation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro

Objectives

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a clinically heterogeneous autoimmune disease with complex pathogenic mechanisms. Complement C1q has been shown to play a major role in SLE, and autoantibodies against C1q (anti‐C1q) are strongly associated with SLE disease activity and severe lupus nephritis suggesting a pathogenic role for anti‐C1q. Whereas C1q alone has anti‐inflammatory effects on human monocytes and macrophages, C1q/anti‐C1q complexes favor a pro‐inflammatory phenotype. This study aimed to elucidate the inflammatory effects of anti‐C1q on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

Methods

Isolated monocytes, isolated T cells and bulk PBMCs of healthy donors with or without concomitant T cell activation were exposed to C1q or complexes of C1q and SLE patient‐derived anti‐C1q (C1q/anti‐C1q). Functional consequences of C1q/anti‐C1q on cells were assessed by determining cytokine secretion, monocyte surface marker expression, T cell activation and proliferation.

Results

Exposure of isolated T cells to C1q or C1q/anti‐C1q did not affect their activation and proliferation. However, unspecific T cell activation in PBMCs in the presence of C1q/anti‐C1q resulted in increased TNF, IFN‐γ and IL‐10 secretion compared with C1q alone. Co‐culture and inhibition experiments showed that the inflammatory effect of C1q/anti‐C1q on PBMCs was due to a direct CD40–CD154 interaction between activated T cells and C1q/anti‐C1q‐primed monocytes. The CD40‐mediated inflammatory reaction of monocytes involves TRAF6 and JAK3‐STAT5 signalling.

Conclusion

In conclusion, C1q/anti‐C1q have a pro‐inflammatory effect on monocytes that depends on T cell activation and CD40–CD154 signalling. This signalling pathway could serve as a therapeutic target for anti‐C1q‐mediated inflammation.

Emerging therapies to target CNS pathophysiology in multiple sclerosis

The rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS) has contributed to paradigm shifts in our understanding of the biological mechanisms that contribute to CNS injury and in treatment philosophies. Opportunities remain to further improve treatment of relapsing-remitting MS, but two major therapeutic gaps are the limiting of progressive disease mechanisms and the repair of CNS injury. In this Review, we provide an overview of selected emerging therapies that predominantly target processes within the CNS that are thought to be involved in limiting non-relapsing, progressive disease injury or promoting tissue repair. Among these, we consider agents that modulate adaptive and innate CNS-compartmentalized inflammation, which can be mediated by infiltrating immune cells and/or resident CNS cells, including microglia and astrocytes. We also discuss agents that target degenerative disease mechanisms, agents that might confer neuroprotection, and agents that create a more favourable environment for or actively contribute to oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation, remyelination and axonal regeneration. We focus on agents that are novel for MS, that are known to or are presumed to penetrate the CNS, and that have already entered early stages of development in MS clinical trials.

Polymer-drug conjugates: Design principles, emerging synthetic strategies and clinical overview

Adagen, an enzyme replacement treatment for adenosine deaminase deficiency, was the first protein-polymer conjugate to be approved in early 1990s. Post this regulatory approval, numerous polymeric drugs and polymeric nanoparticles have entered the market as advanced or next-generation polymer-based therapeutics, while many others have currently been tested clinically. The polymer conjugation to therapeutic moiety offers several advantages, like enhanced solubilization of drug, controlled release, reduced immunogenicity, and prolonged circulation. The present review intends to highlight considerations in the design of therapeutically effective polymer-drug conjugates (PDCs), including the choice of linker chemistry. The potential synthetic strategies to formulate PDCs have been discussed along with recent advancements in the different types of PDCs, i.e., polymer-small molecular weight drug conjugates, polymer-protein conjugates, and stimuli-responsive PDCs, which are under clinical/preclinical investigation. Current impediments and regulatory hurdles hindering the clinical translation of PDC into effective therapeutic regimens for the amelioration of disease conditions have been addressed.

Tailored treatment strategies and future directions in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for physicians due to its protean manifestations and unpredictable course. The disease may manifest as multisystemic or organ-dominant and severity at presentation may vary according to age at onset (childhood-, adult- or late-onset SLE). Different manifestations may respond variably to different immunosuppressive medications and, even within the same organ-system, the severity of inflammation may vary from mild to organ-threatening. Current "state-of-the-art" in SLE treatment aims at remission or low disease activity in all organ systems. Apart from hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids (which should be used with caution), the choice of the appropriate immunosuppressive agent should be individualized and depend on the prevailing manifestation, severity stratification and patient childbearing potential. In this review, we provide an overview of therapeutic options for the various organ manifestations and severity patterns of the disease, different phenotypes (such as multisystem versus organ-dominant disease), as well as specific considerations, including lupus with antiphospholipid antibodies, childhood and late-onset disease, as well as treatment options during pregnancy and lactation.

Current Topics of Relevance to the Xenotransplantation of Free Pig Islets

Pig islet xenotransplantation is a potential treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes. Current efforts are focused on identifying the optimal pig islet source and overcoming the immunological barrier. The optimal age of the pig donors remains controversial since both adult and neonatal pig islets have advantages. Isolation of adult islets using GMP grade collagenase has significantly improved the quantity and quality of adult islets, but neonatal islets can be isolated at a much lower cost. Certain culture media and coculture with mesenchymal stromal cells facilitate neonatal islet maturation and function. Genetic modification in pigs affords a promising strategy to prevent rejection. Deletion of expression of the three known carbohydrate xenoantigens (Gal, Neu5Gc, Sda) will certainly be beneficial in pig organ transplantation in humans, but this is not yet proven in islet transplantation, though the challenge of the '4th xenoantigen' may prove problematic in nonhuman primate models. Blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway leads to long-term islet graft survival (of up to 965 days). Anti-CD40mAbs have already been applied in phase II clinical trials of islet allotransplantation. Fc region-modified anti-CD154mAbs successfully prevent the thrombotic complications reported previously. In this review, we discuss (I) the optimal age of the islet-source pig, (ii) progress in genetic modification of pigs, (iii) the immunosuppressive regimen for pig islet xenotransplantation, and (iv) the reduction in the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction.

A glimpse into the future of systemic lupus erythematosus

This viewpoint article on a forecast of clinically meaningful changes in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the next 10 years is based on a review of the current state of the art. The groundwork has been laid by a robust series of classification criteria and treatment recommendations that have all been published since 2019. Building on this strong foundation, SLE management predictably will take significant steps forward. Assessment for lupus arthritis will presumably include musculoskeletal sonography. Large-scale polyomics studies are likely to unravel more of the central immune mechanisms of the disease. Biomarkers predictive of therapeutic success may enter the field; the type I interferon signature, as a companion for use of anifrolumab, an antibody against the common type I interferon receptor, is one serious candidate. Besides anifrolumab for nonrenal SLE and the new calcineurin inhibitor voclosporin in lupus nephritis, both of which are already approved in the United States and likely to become available in the European Union in 2022, several other approaches are in advanced clinical trials. These include advanced B cell depletion, inhibition of costimulation via CD40 and CD40 ligand (CD40L), and Janus kinase 1 (Jak1) and Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2) inhibition. At the same time, essentially all of our conventional therapeutic armamentarium will continue to be used. The ability of patients to have successful SLE pregnancies, which has become much better in the last decades, should further improve, with approaches including tumor necrosis factor blockade and self-monitoring of fetal heart rates. While we hope that the COVID-19 pandemic will soon be controlled, it has highlighted the risk of severe viral infections in SLE, with increased risk tied to certain therapies. Although there are some data that a cure might be achievable, this likely will remain a challenge beyond 10 years from now.

Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part I. Lupus Erythematosus and Sjögren's Syndrome

The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The first article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for lupus erythematosus and Sjögren's syndrome that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.

Biologic Agents and Other Emerging Therapies for Childhood SLE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by remissions and flares. Twenty percent of SLE presents in childhood where the course of SLE is often more severe with significant morbidity and mortality. Several biologic agents have been developed recently for the treatment of lupus, and although some have proven to be safe and efficacious, many have failed to demonstrate significant benefit in clinical trials. There continues to be a desperate need for safe, effective medications that target specific pathway abnormalities seen in SLE. This is an area of intense research that is changing clinical practice in the treatment of childhood SLE. In this article, we discuss the use of B-cell inhibitors, including belimumab and rituximab, as well as the anti-complement drug eculizumab. Promising treatments on the horizon include the jak-stat inhibitors as well as anifrolumab, which targets interferon. [Pediatr Ann. 2022;51(2):e63-e71.].

The FATIGUE-PRO: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument to Quantify Fatigue in Patients Affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Objectives

This study aimed to implement a patient-centred and evidence-based approach to develop a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument to measure fatigue in patients with SLE.

Methods

A three-step mixed methods psychometric (MMP) approach was followed. Steps comprised first draft item generation and review using interview data; evaluation and refinement of second draft items using mixed methods data, including interview and quantitative data from a phase 2 clinical study in SLE analysed using Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis; and evaluation of the final FATIGUE-PRO items using RMT and complementary Classical Test Theory (CTT) analyses. Guided by MMP criteria, a team of clinicians and outcome-measurement experts assessed evidence to inform instrument development.

Results

Step 1 culminated in 55 items (n = 39 patients interviewed). Their refinement in step 2 using mixed methods evidence led to the final FATIGUE-PRO instrument comprising 31 items across three scales of fatigue: physical fatigue (9 items), mental and cognitive fatigue (11 items) and susceptibility to fatigue (11 items). Qualitative (n = 43 patients) and quantitative (n = 106 patients) evidence strongly supported the scales’ content comprehensiveness and targeting, item quality and fit, conceptual uniqueness and appropriateness of the response scale. The FATIGUE-PRO further benefited from excellent reliability (RMT: 0.92–0.94 and CTT: 0.95–0.96) and supportive evidence of construct validity from assessments against other PROs.

Conclusion

The conceptual advances, comprehensive coverage and strong psychometric properties of the FATIGUE-PRO will significantly advance the measurement and management of fatigue in SLE, both in clinical trials and routine practice.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT02804763

Immune checkpoints and the multiple faces of B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

B-lymphocytes are crucial in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), including autoantibody production, antigen presentation, co-stimulation, and cytokine secretion. Co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules control interactions between B and T cells during an inflammatory response, which is essential for an appropriate host protection and maintenance of self-tolerance. Here, we review recent findings about checkpoint molecules and SLE B cells including their potential therapeutic implications and experiences from clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most prominent checkpoint molecules involved in pathologic B and T cell interaction in SLE are CD40/CD40L and inducible co-stimulator/ICOSL, both also intimately involved in the formation of germinal centers and ectopic lymphoid tissue. Dysregulations of inhibitory checkpoint molecules, like programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 and B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator have been suggested to impair B cell functions in SLE recently.

SUMMARY

Accumulating evidence indicates that dampening immune responses by either blocking co-activating signals or enhancing co-inhibitory signals in different cell types is a promising approach to treat autoimmune diseases to better control active disease but may also allow resolution of chronic autoimmunity.