Impact of Teleconsultation on Subsequent Disease Activity and Flares in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Home-Based Telemedicine in Rheumatology-A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

We performed a scoping review of the relevant literature on home-based telehealth in rheumatology to understand its appropriate application in rheumatology practice.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and scientific meeting abstracts to identify articles that specifically addressed telehealth suitability, barriers to telehealth, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected in telehealth settings, and telehealth satisfaction. From the initial search of 4,882 studies, 23 reports were included. In addition, 10 abstracts were also eligible for analysis, resulting in a total of 33 articles: 2 randomized clinical trials, 9 prospective cohort studies, and 22 retrospective studies.

RESULTS

We found that triage appointments or predictive models could be helpful in selecting patients for telehealth and that telehealth interventions were appropriate for follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammatory arthritis, but that conducting new patient visits over telehealth was not ideal. Barriers to telehealth include patient factors (age, technology access) and need for physician/process factors (eg, physical examinations). PROs collected in regular practice can be incorporated into telehealth. Several small, single-center studies suggest that telehealth does not lead to negative outcomes compared with in-person visits, and overall, patients report high patient satisfaction with telehealth. In several scenarios, home-based telehealth was equivalent to in-person visits with regard to patient outcomes and satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The widespread potential of telehealth to manage and deliver care for people with rheumatic disease is significant. As such, further research in the form of randomized controlled trials can help contribute to growing evidence that shapes telehealth implementation for patients with rheumatic diseases.

Evaluation of assessable telemedicine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Nowadays, the use of telemedicine diagnosis and treatment of various diseases has been considered by physicians, especially in such diseases as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where patients have more weakness and inability to move. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the extent of measurable and nonmeasurable factors in patients with RA and their satisfaction with this method of care.

METHODS

The articles published by March 3, 2022, were searched in four databases, including Web of Sciences, Medline, PubMed, and Scopus. This research was conducted using the seven steps of the Cochrane Handbook as a guide. The searched keywords included telemedicine, tele-rheumatoid, rheumatoid arthritis, and immune diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles were included in the present study. In most of these studies, physicians and patients were satisfied with this approach. Nonetheless, there was a dearth of studies on the measurement of evaluable and nonevaluable factors.

CONCLUSION

Studies on the benefits of telemedicine for rheumatology are still limited. The effectiveness of this new healthcare approach in diagnosing and evaluating disease activity is still unclear. Some studies demonstrated patient and physician satisfaction with this treatment. In some cases, there is a tendency to show a high risk of bias. In addition, it is unclear to what extent the use of rheumatology traps affects the establishment of medical relationships. It is recommended that more clinical trials be conducted to examine this relationship.

Impact of telemedicine on disease activity assessment: A case-crossover study nested within a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

The utilisation of telemedicine has been rapidly growing among patients with rheumatic diseases, especially following the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic. Ease and convenience appear to dominate the reasons for this growth. However, the effects of this approach in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are yet to be revealed. In this study, we examined the effect of telemedicine on disease activity assessment and damage scores in patients with SLE.

METHODS

This case-crossover study was nested within a national prospective cohort of patients with SLE in Saudi Arabia. Patients with SLE were included if they fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria between March 2020 and March 2021 and were assessed at three time points with 3 months between assessments, according to the standardised protocol of this cohort. Telemedicine was conducted for the first evaluation, while in-person assessments were used at the second and third visits. The primary outcome was the difference in the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score. The primary analysis was conducted using the repeated measure model and adjusted for potential confounders, including demographics, medications, and changes in steroid doses. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to mitigate selection and time-varying confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 92 participants were included in this study. Most patients were females (88%), with a mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of 36 (±13) years. The mean (±SD) disease activity scores at baseline were as follows: SLEDAI-2K, 5 (±5); SLE responder index, 3.8 (±3.5); Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index, 1 (±1). The mean difference in SLEDAI-2K score was -1.641 (95% confidence interval -2.773 to -0.510, p = 0.005*) between telemedicine and follow-up visits. The results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

We found that telemedicine assessment was associated with a much higher disease activity score than subsequent assessments, which may suggest an overestimation of disease activity and later assessment accuracy. Cautious adoption has been suggested for SLE patients with active disease.

Willingness, perceived facilitators and barriers to use remote care among healthcare professionals - a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Remote care has the potential of improving access to timely care for people with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD), but there is limited knowledge on how this approach is regarded by healthcare professionals (HCP). This study aimed to examine willingness, perceived facilitators, and barriers to use remote care among HCP.

METHODS

Employees at 20 rheumatology departments in Norway received a digital survey containing 16 statements regarding willingness, perceived facilitators and barriers to use remote care. Statements were scored using numeric rating scales (NRS, 0-10, 10 = strongly agree), and analysed in linear regression models. Open-ended responses with participant-defined facilitators and barriers were analysed using qualitative manifest analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 130 participants from 17 departments completed the survey. The majority of participants were 45 years or older (n = 84, 54%), 54 (42%) were medical doctors, 48 (37%) nurses, and 27 (21%) were allied healthcare professionals, clinical leaders, or secretaries. A high willingness to use remote care was observed (median NRS: 9, IQR 8-10). The facilitator statement with the highest score was that patients save time and costs by using remote care, whereas the barrier statement with the highest score was the lack of physical examination. Willingness to use remote care was positively associated with the belief that patients wish to use it (β: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.34), that patients in remission need less hospital visits (β: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.43), and if remote care is widely adopted by co-workers (β: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.39). Willingness was negatively associated with mistrust in the technical aspects of remote care (β: -0.26, 95% CI:-0.40, -0.11), and lack of physical examination (β: -0.24, 95% CI: -0.43, -0.06). The open-ended responses showed that technological equipment, eligible patients, user-friendly software, adequate training and work flow could be facilitators, but also that lack of these factors were considered barriers to use remote care.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that HCP have a high willingness to use remote care, and provides important new knowledge on perceived facilitators and barriers among HCP relevant for implementation of remote care for eligible patients with IJD.

Parent Views on Telemedicine in Pediatric Rheumatology: A Survey Study

Objectives: The rapid expansion in the use of telemedicine after the COVID-19 pandemic has led many patients with chronic diseases to seek alternative ways for follow-ups. This study aimed to investigate the demands and opinions of parents of children with rheumatic diseases toward telemedicine and to examine the factors affecting telemedicine preference. Methods: A single-center, cross-sectional, Web-based survey study was conducted. Sociodemographic data, characteristics of the disease, access to the clinic, internet use, and views on telemedicine were assessed. Factors effecting telemedicine preference were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Results: A total of 245 parents have completed the survey. The diagnoses of patients were recurrent fever syndromes (55.1%), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (31.0%), systemic connective tissue diseases (8.2%), and vasculitis (5.7%). The majority of patients came to the clinic by public transport (n = 190, 77.6%). Sixty-eight (27.8%) patients missed at least one outpatient appointment in the last year. Majority (n = 172, 70.2%) of parents stated that they would prefer telemedicine visits if it becomes available. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most related factors to telemedicine preference were higher education level (odds ratio [OR]: 6.69, confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.21-20.25, p = 0.001), missing an appointment (OR: 3.04, 95% CI: 1.41-6.56, p = 0.004), and travel time longer than 1 h (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.13-3.86, p = 0.012). Conclusion: Telemedicine visits are in demand in pediatric rheumatology and should be considered an alternative method to ensure continuity of patient follow-up. A personal approach should be followed when selecting patients for telemedicine.

Use of telemedicine for follow-up of lupus nephritis in the COVID-19 outbreak: The 6-month results of a randomized controlled trial

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term patient satisfaction, compliance, disease control, and infection risk of telemedicine (TM) compared with standard in-person follow-up (FU) for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method

This was a single-center open-label randomized controlled study. Consecutive patients followed at the LN clinic were randomized to either TM or standard FU (SF) group in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the TM group received FU via videoconferencing. SF group patients continued conventional in-person outpatient care. The 6-month data were compared and presented.

Results

From June to December 2020, 122 patients were randomized (TM: 60, SF: 62) and had at least 2 FUs. There were no baseline differences, including SLEDAI-2k and proportion of patients in lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), between the two groups except a higher physician global assessment score (PGA) in the TM group. After a mean FU of 19.8 ± 4.5 weeks, the overall patient satisfaction score was higher in the TM group. More patients in the TM group had hospitalization (15/60, 25.0% vs 7/62, 11.3%; p = .049) with higher baseline PGA (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08–1.26) being the independent predictor. The proportions of patients remained in LLDAS were similar in the two groups (TM: 75.0% vs SF: 74.2%, p = .919). None of the patients had COVID-19.

Conclusions

TM FU resulted in better patient satisfaction and similar short-term disease control in patients with LN compared to standard care. However, it was associated with more hospitalizations and might need to be complemented by in-person visits especially in patients with higher PGA.