Rituximab treatment in patients with refractory inflammatory myopathies

Prompt response to rituximab in a patient with resistant polymyositis with complications of dysphagia and dysphonia: a case report

Introduction and importance

Polymyositis is an inflammatory process, primarily affecting proximal muscles, characterized by elevated muscle enzymes and distinctive electromyography patterns.

Case presentation

The authors present a case of a 33-year-old male patient experiencing complications of polymyositis, including pharyngeal and laryngeal involvement leading to dysphagia and dysphonia. Steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy proved ineffective. Subsequently, rituximab was administered, resulting in significant improvement in dysphagia, dysphonia, and proximal muscles within 3 days of the initial rituximab dose. Additionally, there was a remarkable decrease in creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels.

Clinical discussion

Immune-mediated myopathies (IMM) are rare diseases characterized by muscle inflammation and weakness. This case of probable polymyositis, diagnosed through clinical features and elevated CPK, was complicated by the patient's lack of response to glucocorticoids and IVIG therapy. Remarkably, rituximab treatment led to rapid improvement in muscle strength and symptoms, highlighting its potential effectiveness in refractory cases of polymyositis.

Conclusions

Primary treatment for cases of polymyositis typically involves the use of glucocorticoids. However, approximately half of the patients do not respond adequately to corticosteroids alone. Alternatives, in such cases, encompass IVIG therapy and rituximab.

Novel therapeutic targets in dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a systemic autoimmune disease with variable clinical presentations, including inflammation in the skin, muscle, lungs, and/or joints. Current therapeutic strategies in DM typically include broad immunosuppression; however, the currently used modalities are not universally effective and are associated with various side effects, including risk of infection. There is currently a highly unmet need for more effective and well-tolerated therapies. Recent years have witnessed increased interest in pharmaceutical development of new therapeutic strategies for DM. This review aims to summarize the landscape of therapies that are currently being tested or planned in patients with DM. These therapies have a wide variety of immunological targets, including T cells, B cells, inflammatory signaling pathways, type I interferons, autoantibodies, and other targets.

Novel B-cell subsets as potential biomarkers in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: insights into disease pathogenesis and disease activity

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of rare autoimmune disorders characterized by progressive muscle weakness and the histopathologic findings of inflammatory infiltrates in muscle tissue. Although their pathogenesis remains indefinite, the association of autoantibodies with clinical manifestations and the evidence of high effectiveness of depleting therapies suggest that B cells could be implicated. Therefore, we explored the landscape of peripheral B cells in this disease by multiparametric flow cytometry, finding significant numerical decreases in memory and double-negative subsets, as well as an expansion of the naive compartment relative to healthy controls, that contribute to defining disease-associated B-cell subset signatures and correlating with different clinical features of patients. Additionally, we determined the potential value of these subsets as diagnostic biomarkers, thus positioning B cells as neglected key elements possibly participating in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy onset or development.

Belimumab treatment of adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate belimumab addition to the standard of care in patents with refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).

METHODS

We conducted a 40-week multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 1:1 IV belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo randomization and a 24-week open-label extension. Clinical responses were measured by the definition of improvement (DOI) and total improvement score (TIS). Flow cytometry analyses were performed on available samples before randomization, at 24 and 60-64 weeks. Descriptive statistics, t-test, Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance tests were used.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were randomized, 15 received five or more doses of belimumab or placebo and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. More belimumab patients vs placebo attained a TIS ≥40 [55.5% vs 33.3%; P = non-significant (NS)] and achieved the DOI (33.3% vs 16.7%; P = NS) at weeks 40 and 64; the mean TIS was similar among groups. Two patients achieved major responses (TIS = 72.5) after week 40 in the belimumab arm and none in the placebo arm. No improvement in the placebo arm after switching to the open-label phase was observed. There was no steroid-sparing effect. No new safety signals were detected. Although total B cells were not reduced, belimumab induced naïve B cell depletion while enhancing the number and frequency memory B cells.

CONCLUSION

The study did not meet the primary endpoint and no statistically significant differences were observed in clinical responses between arms. More patients achieved sustained TIS ≥40 and reached the DOI. Most patients who received belimumab for >40 weeks had clinical improvement. Phenotypic changes in B cell populations were not associated with clinical responses.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/), NCT02347891.

Neoself Antigens Presented on MHC Class II Molecules in Autoimmune Diseases

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II molecules play a crucial role in immunity by presenting peptide antigens to helper T cells. Immune cells are generally tolerant to self-antigens. However, when self-tolerance is broken, immune cells attack normal tissues or cells, leading to the development of autoimmune diseases. Genome-wide association studies have shown that MHC class II is the gene most strongly associated with the risk of most autoimmune diseases. When misfolded self-antigens, called neoself antigens, are associated with MHC class II molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum, they are transported by the MHC class II molecules to the cell surface without being processed into peptides. Moreover, neoself antigens that are complexed with MHC class II molecules of autoimmune disease risk alleles exhibit distinct antigenicities compared to normal self-antigens, making them the primary targets of autoantibodies in various autoimmune diseases. Elucidation of the immunological functions of neoself antigens presented on MHC class II molecules is crucial for understanding the mechanism of autoimmune diseases.

Pain in autoimmune inflammatory myopathies: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Pain is considered a priority for research by adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory myopathy (AIM) and their families. Our aim was to review the literature for studies reporting on pain in adult AIM and to summarise their findings.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted searching for studies in PubMed and MEDLINE including more than five adult patients with AIM and assessing pain using a patient-reported outcome measure. Study population characteristics, pain measurement and clinical correlates of pain were extracted using a standardised protocol.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 2831 studies with 33 meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies used visual analogue scales (n=14) and/or the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Bodily Pain Scale (n=17). Frequency of pain and/or myalgias ranged from 64% to 100%. Subjects with AIM had significantly more pain than the general population and comparable pain to other chronic rheumatic diseases. Insufficient results were available to identify significant clinical correlates of pain in AIM.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that the burden of pain in AIM is considerable. Still, due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the evidence, significant knowledge gaps persist. Studies are needed to characterise pain trajectories of patients with AIM.

Autoimmune inflammatory myopathies

The autoimmune inflammatory myopathies constitute a heterogeneous group of acquired myopathies that have in common the presence of endomysial inflammation and moderate to severe muscle weakness. Based on currently evolved distinct clinical, histologic, immunopathologic, and autoantibody features, these disorders can be best classified as dermatomyositis, necrotizing autoimmune myositis, antisynthetase syndrome-overlap myositis, and inclusion body myositis. Although polymyositis is no longer considered a distinct subset but rather an extinct entity, it is herein described because its clinicopathologic information has provided over many years fundamental information on T-cell-mediated myocytotoxicity, especially in reference to inclusion body myositis. Each inflammatory myopathy subset has distinct immunopathogenesis, prognosis, and response to immunotherapies, necessitating the need to correctly diagnose each subtype from the outset and avoid disease mimics. The paper describes the main clinical characteristics that aid in the diagnosis of each myositis subtype, highlights the distinct features on muscle morphology and immunopathology, elaborates on the potential role of autoantibodies in pathogenesis or diagnosis , and clarifies common uncertainties in reference to putative triggering factors such as statins and viruses including the 2019-coronavirus-2 pandemic. It extensively describes the main autoimmune markers related to autoinvasive myocytotoxic T-cells, activated B-cells, complement, cytokines, and the possible role of innate immunity. The concomitant myodegenerative features seen in inclusion body myositis along with their interrelationship between inflammation and degeneration are specifically emphasized. Finally, practical guidelines on the best therapeutic approaches are summarized based on up-to-date knowledge and controlled studies, highlighting the prospects of future immunotherapies and ongoing controversies.

Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune diseases with various subtypes, myositis-specific antibodies, and affect multiple systems. The treatment of IIMs remains challenging, especially for refractory myositis. In addition to steroids and traditional immunosuppressants, rituximab (RTX), a B cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, is emerging as an alternative treatment for refractory myositis. However, the therapeutic response to RTX remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of RTX in patients with IIMs, excluding sporadic inclusion body myositis.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang Data were searched for relevant studies. The overall effective rate, complete response rate, and partial response rate were calculated to assess the efficacy of RTX. The incidences of adverse events, infection, severe adverse events, severe infection, and infusion reactions were collected to evaluate the safety of RTX. Subgroup analyses were performed using IIM subtypes, affected organs, continents, and countries. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to identify the sources of heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 26 studies were included in the quantitative analysis, which showed that 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54%, 75%) of patients with IIMs responded to RTX, 45% (95% CI: 22%, 70%) of patients achieved a complete response, and 39% (95% CI: 26%, 53%) achieved a partial response. Subgroup analyses indicated that the overall efficacy rates in patients with refractory IIMs, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, as well as anti-synthetase syndrome were 62%, 68%, and 62%, respectively. The overall efficacy rates for muscle, lungs, and skin involvement were 59%, 65%, and 81%, respectively. In addition, studies conducted in Germany and the United States showed that patients with IIMs had an excellent response to RTX, with an effective rate of 90% and 77%, respectively. The incidence of severe adverse events and infections was 8% and 2%, respectively.

Conclusion

RTX may be an effective and relatively safe treatment choice in patients with IIMs, especially for refractory cases. However, further verification via randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Off-Label Uses of Rituximab in Dermatology

Purpose of Review

Rituximab has transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies and rheumatoid arthritis in the past 2 decades. More recently, this anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has seen increasing usage in the field of dermatology. This review highlights the evidence supporting its use in several important dermatologic conditions.

Recent Findings

Key recent findings include the 2018 FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pemphigus.

Summary

Data from randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. More limited data suggests its use in recalcitrant cases of diseases such as pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and dermatomyositis. There is scarce evidence and mixed results for rituximab when studied in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Current and new targets for treating myositis

As treatment of refractory idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) has been challenging, there is growing interest in assessing new therapies that target various pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of IIM. In the largest clinical trial to date, rituximab was studied in adult and juvenile myositis, but the primary outcome was not met despite 83 percent of subjects with refractory myositis meeting the definition of improvement. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently granted approval to Octagam 10% immune globulin intravenous (IVIg), for the treatment of adult dermatomyositis based on impressive results from a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) utility in IIM is not recommended and recent reports suggest this therapy may induce systemic autoimmune disease including myositis. Further, anti-IL6 therapy cannot be recommended as a recent trial of tocilizumab failed to reach its primary endpoint. Further studies are needed to assess the role of newer therapies such as abatacept (inhibition of T cell co-stimulation), sifalimumab (anti-IFNα), Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors, apremilast (phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor), and KZR-616 (selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome) given their biological plausibility and encouraging recent small-case series results. The future of IIM therapy will depend on exploring biomarkers implicated in the etiopathogenesis of IIM, improvements in myositis classification based on serological and histopathological features, and well-designed controlled clinical trials using validated consensus outcome measures.

Antibody Therapies in Autoimmune Inflammatory Myopathies: Promising Treatment Options

Inflammatory myopathies, including polymyositis (PM), dermatomyositis (DM), inclusion body myositis (IBM), necrotizing myopathy (NM), antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) and overlap myositis (OM), in short myositis, are rare diseases. All forms of myositis have progressive muscle weakness in common, with each subtype characterized by different autoantibody profiles, histological findings and extramuscular manifestations. Due to better understanding of the pathogenesis of the muscle inflammation in myositis, new molecular pathways for targeted therapy have been discovered. Current therapies aim at different components of the innate or the adaptive immune response. Additionally, non-inflammatory mechanisms in myositis have come into focus as possible treatment targets. The use of therapeutical antibodies in myositis has been examined in various clinical studies, several of them randomized controlled ones: Depletion of B-cells by rituximab has been established as treatment of refractory myositis. IVIG, an antibody therapy in the wider sense, has now been licensed for DM following a recent positive clinical trial. Negative study results were reported in randomized trials with infliximab, sifalimumab and bimagrumab. Studies on basiliximab and eculizumab are currently underway, and are expected to yield results in a couple of years. Despite some promising results of clinical studies with antibody therapy in myositis, further research is crucial to optimize the treatment for this debilitating disease and to find treatment alternatives for treatment-refractory patients.

Cell surface-expressed Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR complex is targeted by autoantibodies in patients with inflammatory myopathies

Intracellular proteins are often targeted by autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases; however, the mechanism through which intracellular molecules are targeted remains unknown. We previously found that several intracellular misfolded proteins are transported to the cell surface by HLA class II molecules and are recognized by autoantibodies in some autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, and microscopic polyangiitis. Ro52 is an intracellular Fc receptor that is a target antigen for myositis-associated autoantibodies. We analyzed the role of HLA class II molecules in the autoantibody recognition of Ro52. Ro52 alone was not transported to the cell surface by HLA class II molecules; however, it was transported to the cell surface in the presence of both IgG heavy chain and HLA class II molecules to form a Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR complex. The Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR complex was specifically recognized by autoantibodies from some patients with inflammatory myopathies. We then evaluated 120 patients with inflammatory myopathies with four types of myositis-specific antibodies and analyzed the autoantibodies against the Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR complex. The specific antibodies against the Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR complex were detected in 90% and 93% of patients who were positive for anti-MDA5 and anti-ARS antibodies, respectively. In individual patients with these two inflammatory myopathies, changes in serum titers of anti-Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR-specific antibodies were correlated with the levels of KL-6 (R = 0.51 in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM patients, R = 0.67 in anti-ARS antibody-positive PM/DM patients with respiratory symptoms) and CK (R = 0.63 in anti-ARS antibody-positive PM/DM patients with muscle symptoms) over time. These results suggest that antibodies against Ro52/IgG/HLA-DR expressed on the cell surface could be involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathy subgroups.

Physical activity in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: two intervention proposals based on literature review

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are rare diseases affecting skeletal muscles and leading to progressive muscle weakness and disability. Thanks to the better understanding of their pathogenesis, the management of IIM has been noteworthily implemented in recent years. Current therapeutic strategies include pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, among which physical exercise represents a useful option, able to ameliorate disease activity without worsening muscle inflammation. The aim of this narrative review is therefore to provide an updated overview of the benefits of physical exercise in patients with IIM and to suggest plausible training programs to be applied in patients with dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing myopathy, and inclusion body myositis. In this regard, a combined strategy mixing aerobic and resistance exercises could positively affect the pro-inflammatory and metabolic pathways occurring in skeletal muscles, while promoting muscle fiber regeneration and repair.

Rituximab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a retrospective single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are essentially treated aiming to improve muscle function and extra muscular disease manifestations. Rituximab is potentially a glucocorticoid-sparing agent which was reviewed in multiple studies with small sample sizes due to the rarity of the disease. Higher statistical power can enhance the trustworthiness of alternative treatment modalities yielding the main objective of this study.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary rheumatology center. Patients were diagnosed with an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM)) and were treated with rituximab to be included in this study. Parameters of disease activity including acute phase reactants, muscle enzyme levels, and disease-specific autoantibodies were analyzed. The primary study endpoint was the improvement of the patient symptoms. The secondary endpoint was the decrease in the creatinine kinase level.

RESULTS

The study includes 26 patients (19 DM, 7 PM). The age of diagnosis was 42.04 ± 15.22 years; the follow-up duration was 64.84 ± 71.91 months. The mean corticosteroid dose decreased from 32.895 ± 24.399 to 8.44 ± 11.29 (p < 0.001). Other treatment methods were methotrexate (n = 18), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (n = 7), and cyclophosphamide (n = 2). Two patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab is shown to be effective in treating myositis along with corticosteroids as well as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in retrospective studies and open-label clinical trials; however, lack of statistical power should be underlined. Long-term decrease in steroid use and decrease in disease activity markers hint the effective use of rituximab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent as well as its safety with minimal side effects. Key Points • Long-term decrease in steroid use and decrease in disease activity markers hint the effective use of rituximab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent as well as its safety with minimal side effects.

Hand-held dynamometry for assessment of muscle strength in patients with inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVES

Muscle weakness in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is conventionally assessed using manual muscle testing (MMT). However, more objective tools must be developed to accurately and reliably quantify muscle strength in myositis patients. Hand-held dynamometry (HHD) is a quantitative, portable device with reported reliability in neuromuscular disorders. Our aim was to assess the reliability, validity and responsiveness of HHD in myositis.

METHODS

Myositis patients [DM, necrotizing myopathy (NM), PM and anti-synthetase syndrome] evaluated at the University of Pittsburgh myositis centre were prospectively enrolled. Each patient was assessed at 0, 3 and 6 months for validated outcome measures of myositis disease activity and physical function. At each visit, muscle strength was assessed using both MMT and HHD (Micro FET2, Hoggan Health Industries, Draper, UT, USA). The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the HHD was assessed using standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Fifty IIM patients (60% female; mean age 51.6 years; 6 PM, 9 NM, 24 DM and 11 anti-synthetase syndrome) were enrolled. HHD showed strong test-retest intrarater reliability (r = 0.96) and interrater reliability (r = 0.98). HHD correlated significantly with the MMT score (r = 0.48, P = 0.0006) and myositis disease activity and functional measures. Longitudinal analysis showed a significant and strong association between the HHD and MMT as well as 2016 ACR/EULAR myositis response criteria (r = 0.8, P < 0.0001) demonstrating responsiveness. The mean effect size and standardized response mean of HHD was large: 0.95 and 1.03, respectively. MMT had a high ceiling effect compared with HHD.

CONCLUSION

HHD demonstrated strong reliability, construct validity and responsiveness in myositis patients. External validation studies are required to confirm these findings.

The Role of Immune Cells in the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are chronic autoimmune disorders involving multiple organs, such as the muscle, skin, lungs and joints. Although the detailed pathogenesis of IIMs remains unclear, immune mechanisms have long been recognised as of key importance. Immune cells contribute to many inflammatory processes via intercellular interactions and secretion of inflammatory factors, and many studies have demonstrated the participation of a variety of immune cells, such as T cells and B cells, in the development of IIMs. Here, we summarise the current knowledge regarding immune cells in IIM patients and discuss their potential roles in IIM pathogenesis.

Clinical trials and novel therapeutics in dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there are no proven drugs that are FDA approved for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM), even though multiple clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate safety and efficacy of novel therapeutics in DM. The purpose of this review is to highlight the biological plausibility, existing clinical evidence as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in pipeline for development for use in dermatomyositis.

AREAS COVERED

The drugs with the strongest evidence have been included in this review with a focus on the mechanism of their action pertaining to the disease process, clinical studies including completed and ongoing trials. With better understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic process, there are new molecular targets that have been identified that can be targeted by these novel drugs, predominantly biologic drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

There are various drugs being evaluated in phase II/III clinical trials that hold promise in DM. At the forefront of these are immunoglobulin, Lenabasum, and Abatacept for which phase III clinical trials are ongoing. In addition, promising clinical studies are ongoing or reported for KZR-616, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, and Repository Corticotrophin Injection (RCI).

Juvenile dermatomyositis: advances in clinical presentation, myositis-specific antibodies and treatment

BACKGROUND

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a chronic autoimmune disease characteristic by inflammation of small vessels within the skin, muscle and vital organs. But the clinical features and treatment of JDM have not been fully clarified.

DATA SOURCES

Databases underwent through PubMed for articles about the clinical features, myositis-specific antibodies of JDM and its treatment, and we selected publications written in English which were relevant to the topic of this review.

RESULTS

Clinical features and myositis-specific antibodies may predict the severity and prognosis of disease. Although the mortality rate has been lower with traditional treatments, such as corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulin, and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs such as methotrexate, their usages are variable. Novel biological therapies seem to be effective for refractory JDM patients, but more clinical trials are necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

JDM is a sever disease of childhood. We need to better understand recent advances of JDM in the context of clinical features including skin manifestations, muscle weakness and organ damage, myositis-specific antibodies and their associated outcomes and the treatment of disease.

Biologic therapy in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of autoimmune diseases resulting from inflammation of muscle and manifesting as weakness, though a range of extra-muscular manifestations are observed. These are often correlated closely with disease subtype and the presence of myositis-specific/myositis-associated antibodies. IIM are notoriously difficult to treat and often refractory to glucocorticoid therapy and synthetic immunosuppressants. Both the innate and adaptive immune systems are implicated in the pathogenesis of IIM. A growing understanding of the key cytokines as well as the cell-mediated and antibody effectors of disease has identified multiple potential targets for biologic therapy. The most widely used of these is B-cell depletion via rituximab though the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and other biologic therapies used in diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis have also been trialled. This review summarises the literature thus far on biologic therapy in IIM, highlighting both the significant trials that influence current treatment regimens and also the continuing need for further research to inform more effective therapies.

Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the treatment of systemic autoimmune myopathies

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of the Myopathy Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the management and therapy of systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAM).

MAIN BODY

The review of the literature was done in the search for the Medline (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane databases including studies published until June 2018. The Prisma was used for the systematic review and the articles were evaluated according to the levels of Oxford evidence. Ten recommendations were developed addressing the management and therapy of systemic autoimmune myopathies.

CONCLUSIONS

Robust data to guide the therapeutic process are scarce. Although not proven effective in controlled clinical trials, glucocorticoid represents first-line drugs in the treatment of SAM. Intravenous immunoglobulin is considered in induction for refractory cases of SAM or when immunosuppressive drugs are contra-indicated. Consideration should be given to the early introduction of immunosuppressive drugs. There is no specific period determined for the suspension of glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive drugs when individually evaluating patients with SAM. A key component for treatment in an early rehabilitation program is the inclusion of strength-building and aerobic exercises, in addition to a rigorous evaluation of these activities for remission of disease and the education of the patient and his/her caregivers.

Biologics for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As treatment of refractory cases of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) has been challenging, there is growing interest in assessing novel biologics that target various pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of IIM.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the largest clinical trial in adult and juvenile IIM assessing the effectiveness of rituximab, the primary outcome was not met but 83% of this refractory group of IIM patients met a predefined definition of improvement and rituximab demonstrated a significant glucocorticoid-sparing effect. Antitumor necrosis factor utility in IIM is generally limited by uncertain efficacy data along with recent reports suggesting their potential for inducing systemic autoimmune disease including IIM.

SUMMARY

Further research is required to evaluate the role of newer therapies such as tocilizumab (anti-interleukin-6), abatacept (inhibition of T-cell costimulation), sifalimumab (anti-interferonα) and ruxolitinib, (Janus kinase inhibitor) given their biological plausibility and encouraging recent small case series results. Future clinical trials should consider the targeting of biomarkers implicated in the etiopathogenesis of IIM, predictive factors of treatment response, recent revisions in IIM classification criteria, as well as newly developed data-driven response criteria which employ validated core set measures.

Update on outcome assessment in myositis

The adult and juvenile myositis syndromes, commonly referred to collectively as idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), are systemic autoimmune diseases with the hallmarks of muscle weakness and inflammation. Validated, well-standardized measures to assess disease activity, known as core set measures, were developed by international networks of myositis researchers for use in clinical trials. Composite response criteria using weighted changes in the core set measures of disease activity were developed and validated for adult and juvenile patients with dermatomyositis and adult patients with polymyositis, with different thresholds for minimal, moderate and major improvement in adults and juveniles. Additional measures of muscle strength and function are being validated to improve content validity and sensitivity to change. A health-related quality of life measure, which incorporates patient input, is being developed for adult patients with IIM. Disease state criteria, including criteria for inactive disease and remission, are being used as secondary end points in clinical trials. MRI of muscle and immunological biomarkers are promising approaches to discriminate between disease activity and damage and might provide much-needed objective outcome measures. These advances in the assessment of outcomes for myositis treatment, along with collaborations between international networks, should facilitate further development of new therapies for patients with IIM.

Rituximab in the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Associated with Antisynthetase Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Review

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical outcomes including imaging findings on computed tomography (CT), pulmonary function testing (PFT), and glucocorticoid (GC) use in patients with the antisynthetase syndrome (AS) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) treated with rituximab (RTX).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients at 2 institutions with AS-ILD who were treated with RTX. Baseline demographics, PFT, and chest CT were assessed before and after RTX. Two radiologists independently evaluated CT using a standardized scoring system.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (n = 13) and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (n = 12) were included. Antisynthetase antibodies were identified in all patients (16 Jo1, 6 PL-12, 3 PL-7). In 21 cases (84%), the principal indication for RTX use was recurrent or progressive ILD, owing to failure of other agents. Comparing pre- and post-RTX pulmonary variables at 12 months, CT score and forced vital capacity were stable or improved in 88% and 79% of subjects, respectively. Total lung capacity (%) increased from 56 ± 13 to 64 ± 13 and GC dose decreased from 18 ± 9 to 12 ± 12 mg/day. Although DLCO (%) declined slightly at 1 year, it increased from 42 ± 17 to 70 ± 20 at 3 years. The most common imaging patterns on CT were nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP; n = 13) and usual interstitial pneumonia/fibrotic NSIP (n = 5), of which 5 had concurrent elements of cryptogenic organizing pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

Stability or improvement in pulmonary function or severity of ILD on CT was seen in most patients. Use of RTX was well tolerated in the majority of patients. RTX may play a therapeutic role in patients with AS-ILD, and further clinical investigation is warranted.

Current perspective on rituximab in rheumatic diseases

The steadily increasing knowledge regarding pathogenetic mechanisms in autoimmune rheumatic diseases has paved the way to different therapeutic approaches. In particular, the market entry of biologics has dramatically modified the natural history of rheumatic chronic inflammatory diseases with a meaningful impact on patients’ quality of life. Among the wide spectrum of available biological treatments, rituximab (RTX), first used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, was later approved for rheumatoid arthritis and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated vasculitis. Nowadays, in rheumatology, RTX is also used with off-label indications in patients with systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. RTX is a monoclonal antibody directed to CD20 molecules expressed on the surfaces of pre-B and mature B lymphocytes. It acts by causing apoptosis of these cells with antibody- and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. As inflammatory responses to cell-associated immune complexes are key elements in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such an approach might be effective in these patients. In fact, RTX, by promoting the rapid and long-term depletion of circulating and lymphoid tissue-associated B cells, leads to a lower recruitment of these effector cells at sites of immune complex deposition, thus reducing inflammation and tissue damage. RTX is of the most interest to rheumatologists as it represents an important additional therapeutic approach. Thus, the advent in clinical practice of approved RTX biosimilars, such as CT-P10, may be of help in improving treatment access as well as in reducing costs.

Off-label use of rituximab in autoimmune disease in the Top End of the Northern Territory, 2008-2016

BACKGROUND

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody, is increasingly prescribed off-label for a range of autoimmune diseases. There has not previously been an audit of off-label rituximab use in the Northern Territory, where the majority of patients are Aboriginal.

AIMS

To evaluate retrospectively off-label rituximab use in autoimmune diseases in the Top End of the Northern Territory.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective audit of 8 years of off-label rituximab use at the Royal Darwin Hospital, the sole tertiary referral centre for the Darwin, Katherine and East Arnhem regions. Electronic and paper records were reviewed for demographic information, diagnosis/indication for rituximab, doses, previous/concomitant immunosuppression, clinical outcomes and specific adverse events.

RESULTS

Rituximab was prescribed off-label to 66 patients for 24 autoimmune diseases. The majority of patients (62.1%) were Aboriginal and 60.6% female. The most common indications were refractory/relapsing disease despite standard therapies (68.7%) or severe disease with rituximab incorporated into an induction immunosuppressive regimen (19.4%). Systemic lupus erythematosus was the underlying diagnosis in 28.8% of cases. A clinically significant response was demonstrated in 74.2% of cases overall. There were 18 clinically significant infections; however, 13 were in patients receiving concurrent immunosuppressive therapy. There was a total of nine deaths from any cause.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab has been used off-label for a range of autoimmune diseases in this population with a high proportion of Aboriginal patients successfully and safely in the majority of cases.

Recovery from severe dysphagia in systemic sclerosis - myositis overlap: a case report

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is common in inflammatory myopathies and usually responds to corticosteroids. Severe dysphagia requiring feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is associated with significant morbidity and high mortality.

CLINICAL CASE

A 56-year old African Black woman initially presented with systemic sclerosis (SSC) - myositis overlap and interstitial lung disease. She responded to high dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, with improvement in her lung function and regression of the skin changes. Six years later she had a myositis flare with severe dysphagia. Her myositis improved after high doses of corticosteroids, azathioprine and two doses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). As her dysphagia persisted, she was fed via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube and given a course of rituximab. Her dysphagia gradually resolved and the PEG tube was removed within two months. She received another dose of rituximab six months later and continued low dose prednisone and azathioprine. Her muscle power improved, weight returned to normal and she remained well 20 months after hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our patient with SSC-myositis overlap and severe dysphagia requiring PEG feeding, improved with high dose corticosteroids, azathioprine, two courses of IVIG and rituximab, and remained in remission 20 months after hospital discharge.

Modern Therapies for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIMs): Role of Biologics

Despite the lack of placebo-controlled trials, glucocorticoids are considered the mainstay of initial treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIMs) and myositis-associated ILD (MA-ILD). Glucocorticoid-sparing agents are often given concomitantly with other immunosuppressive agents, particularly in patients with moderate or severe disease. As treatment of refractory cases of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has been challenging, there is growing interest in evaluating newer therapies including biologics that target various pathways involved in the pathogenesis of IIMs. In a large clinical trial of rituximab in adult and juvenile myositis, the primary outcome was not met, but the definition of improvement was met by most of this refractory group of myositis patients. Rituximab use was also associated with a significant glucocorticoid-sparing effect. Intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) can be used for refractory IIMs or those with severe dysphagia or concomitant infections. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) utility in IIMs is generally limited by previous negative studies along with recent reports suggesting their potential for inducing myositis. Further research is required to assess the role of new therapies such as tocilizumab (anti-IL6), ACTH gel, sifalimumab (anti-IFNα), and abatacept (inhibition of T cell co-stimulation) given their biological plausibility and encouraging small case series results. Other potential novel therapies include alemtuzumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody which binds CD52 on B and T lymphocytes), fingolimod (a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator that traps T lymphocytes in the lymphoid organs), eculizumab, and basiliximab. The future investigations in IIMs will depend on well-designed controlled clinical trials using validated consensus core set measures and improvements in myositis classification schemes based on serologic and histopathologic features.

Update on the pharmacological treatment of adult myositis

The management of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) remains a challenge given the systemic features beyond active myositis. That is, recognizing the inflammatory arthropathy, varying dermatomyositis rashes, and overt and occult features of interstitial lung disease in addition to myositis adds to the complexity of diagnosis and treatment of IIM. However, clinicians now have available many more immunosuppressive drugs as well as biologic agents for use in patients with myositis and other autoimmune diseases. Here, the use of these agents is reviewed and support based on available published literature is provided even though many studies have been small and results somewhat anecdotal. Glucocorticoids remain the initial treatment of choice in most instances and methotrexate and azathioprine are often used early in the treatment course. These agents are followed by other immunosuppressive drugs, for example mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, cyclosporine and cyclophosphamide, some of which are used alone while combinations of these agents also provide an effective option. There is more rationale for the use of biologic agents such as rituximab from a mechanistic perspective and, given the incorporation of validated core set measures in assessing myositis patients, we can look forward to better designed clinical trials in the future.

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Clinical Approach and Management

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of chronic, autoimmune conditions affecting primarily the proximal muscles. The most common types are dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), necrotizing autoimmune myopathy (NAM), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM). Patients typically present with sub-acute to chronic onset of proximal weakness manifested by difficulty with rising from a chair, climbing stairs, lifting objects, and combing hair. They are uniquely identified by their clinical presentation consisting of muscular and extramuscular manifestations. Laboratory investigations, including increased serum creatine kinase (CK) and myositis specific antibodies (MSA) may help in differentiating clinical phenotype and to confirm the diagnosis. However, muscle biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. These disorders are potentially treatable with proper diagnosis and initiation of therapy. Goals of treatment are to eliminate inflammation, restore muscle performance, reduce morbidity, and improve quality of life. This review aims to provide a basic diagnostic approach to patients with suspected IIM, summarize current therapeutic strategies, and provide an insight into future prospective therapies.

Rituximab in the treatment of inflammatory myopathies: a review

Several uncontrolled studies have encouraged the use of rituximab (RTX) in patients with myositis. Unfortunately, the first placebo-phase trial to assess the efficacy of RTX in refractory myositis did not show a significant difference between the two treatment groups, and doubts have been expressed about its study design. In this review we present an up-to-date overview of the reported experiences of RTX therapy in myositis. A PubMed search was performed to find all the available cases of refractory myositis patients treated with RTX up to July 2015. The following terms were assessed: inflammatory myopathies OR anti-synthetase syndrome OR polymyositis OR dermatomyositis AND RTX. A total of 48 studies were included. We identified 458 patients with myositis treated with RTX. We found a rate of response to RTX of 78.3%. RTX can play a role in the management of patients with myositis, at least in those with positive myositis-specific autoantibodies.

Efficacy of Rituximab in Refractory Inflammatory Myopathies Associated with Anti- Synthetase Auto-Antibodies: An Open-Label, Phase II Trial

OBJECTIVE

Anti-synthetase syndrome (anti-SS) is frequently associated with myositis and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We evaluated prospectively, in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study, the efficacy of rituximab on muscle and lung outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled if they were refractory to conventional treatments (prednisone and at least 2 immunosuppressants). They received 1 g of rituximab at D0, D15, and M6. The primary endpoint was muscular improvement based on manual muscular testing (MMT10, Kendall score in 10 muscles) at M12. Secondary endpoints were normalization of creatine kinase (CK) level, ILD improvement based on forced vital capacity and/or diffuse capacity for carbon monoxide, and number and/or doses of associated immunosuppressants.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled, and 10 completed the study. Only 2 patients presented an improvement of at least 4 points on at least two muscle groups (primary end-point). Overall, seven patients had an increase of at least 4 points on MMT10. CK level decreased from 399 IU/L (range, 48-11,718) to 74.5 IU/L (range, 40-47,857). Corticosteroid doses decreased from 52.5 mg/d (range, 10-70) to 9 mg/d (range, 7-65) and six patients had a decrease in the burden of their associated immunosuppressants. At baseline, all 10 patients presented with ILD. At M12, improvement of ILD was observed in 5 out of the 10 patients, stabilization in 4, and worsening in 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study of rituximab treatment in patients with refractory anti-SS provided data on evolution of muscular and pulmonary parameters. Rituximab should now be evaluated in a larger, controlled study for this homogenous group of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00774462.

Treatment of inflammatory myopathy: emerging therapies and therapeutic targets

Despite the lack of placebo-controlled trials, glucocorticoids are considered the mainstay of initial treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and myositis-associated interstitial lung disease. Glucocorticoid-sparing agents are often given concomitantly with other immunosuppressive agents, particularly in patients with moderate or severe disease. First-line conventional immunosuppressive drugs include either methotrexate or azathioprine, and when they fail, more aggressive therapy includes mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus or cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, or cyclophosphamide, used alone or in various combinations. Further investigations are required to assess the role of more novel therapies in the treatment of myositis and myositis-associated interstitial lung disease.

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy associated with antibodies to the signal recognition particle treated with a combination of rituximab and cyclophosphamide

A 50-year-old man presented with dysphagia and proximal muscle weakness. He was diagnosed with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy associated with antibodies to the signal recognition particle. After an initial response following treatment with high-dose steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and methotrexate, there was a relapse of the immune condition. The clinical deterioration occurred less than 2 months after disease onset. The refractoriness of this disease was characterised by an increase of the already severe muscle wasting that led to respiratory failure and progressive dysphagia, regardless of the immunosuppressant treatment. At this time the patient was referred to our department. He was restarted on intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone associated with intravenous cyclophosphamide, but with no effect. After 3 weeks, rituximab was started with a dramatic and progressive improvement. There were no complications associated with rituximab/cyclophosphamide treatment and the disease has been kept in remission, for the last 3 years.

Interstitial lung disease associated with the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and the antisynthetase syndrome: recent advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent advances in understanding the clinical spectrum, pathogenesis, and treatment of interstitial lung disease associated with inflammatory myositis and the antisynthetase syndrome.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisynthetase antibodies and the anti-MDA-5 antibody have become commercially available. As a result, several large, retrospective analyses have illustrated both the pulmonary and non-pulmonary features associated with the antisynthetase syndrome and myositis-related interstitial lung disease. Notably, there is now a better appreciation for the heterogeneity of these syndromes and the prognostic value in accurately identifying the associated autoantibodies. Human cytokine profiling and murine models of muscle inflammation suggest that tRNA synthetases themselves may act to trigger an initial innate immune response, thus offering new insights into the pathophysiology of these diseases. Finally, although randomized clinical trials in patients with myositis-associated interstitial lung disease have not occurred, new observational studies suggest that cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and rituximab may be effective treatment options.

SUMMARY

Recent research has provided a better understanding of the phenotype and prognosis that define interstitial lung disease in the setting of myositis and the antisynthetase syndrome. Although several therapeutic agents demonstrate promise, randomized trials are needed in order to establish the best clinical approach in these patients. Furthermore, additional research into the pathophysiology of this disease will be necessary to develop newer, more targeted therapeutics.