Effectiveness of sulfasalazine and methotrexate in 1102 DMARD-naive patients with early RA

Clinical and immunological effects of hydroxychloroquine in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite antirheumatic treatment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients with active RA, despite conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), were recruited. HCQ was administered for 24 weeks, in addition to prior treatment. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 24, compared to that of a propensity score-matched historical control group.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and administered HCQ. We also identified 276 patients as candidates for the historical control group. Propensity score matching yielded 46 patients in each group. The proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at Week 24 was significantly higher in the HCQ group than in the control group (54.4% vs. 28.3%, P = .007). The proportion of patients achieving ACR50 and ACR70 at Week 24 were also higher in the HCQ group than in the control group (ACR50, 30.4% vs. 4.3%, P = .006; ACR70, 17.4% vs. 0%, P = .005). Neither HCQ retinopathy nor any new safety signal was observed during the study.

CONCLUSION

The addition of HCQ to csDMARDs was effective, with no new safety signal in patients with RA.

Discontinuation rate of sulfasalazine, leflunomide and methotrexate due to adverse events in a real-life setting (NOR-DMARD)

Objectives

MTX, LEF and SSZ are conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) with a well-established role in the treatment of RA. We aimed to estimate and compare the relative risks for adverse events (AEs) and the discontinuation of these drugs owing to AEs.

Methods

We included all 3339 patients from the NOR-DMARD study treated with MTX, LEF or SSZ in monotherapy. All reported AEs were compared between treatment groups using quasi-Poisson regression. In addition, drug retention rates were analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates with Cox regression to control for possible confounders. We analysed drug retention rates and cumulative risk of discontinuation attributable to AEs using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. We assessed age, sex, baseline DAS in 28 joints with ESR (DAS28-ESR), seropositivity, prednisolone use, previous DMARD use, year of inclusion and co-morbidity as possible cofounders.

Results

We found that the discontinuation rate attributable to AEs was significantly higher for LEF and SSZ than for MTX. After the first year, it was 13.7% (95% CI 12.2, 15.2), 39.6% (95% CI 34.8, 44) and 43.4% (95% CI 38.2, 48.1) for MTX, SSZ and LEF, respectively. Similar results were found when adjusting for confounders. The overall AEs were comparable across the treatment groups. The AE profile was as expected for each drug.

Conclusion

Our work has shown a similar AE profile of csDMARDs to previous data. However, higher discontinuation rates for SSZ and LEF cannot be explained easily from AE profiles.

Long-term persistence of oral methotrexate and associated factors in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study

There is little data on long-term persistence/continuation of methotrexate among Indian Rheumatoid arthritis patients. We assembled a retrospective single-center cohort consisting of RA patients (fulfilling 1987 ACR criteria) started on methotrexate as part of three academic studies (including two RCTs) from 2011 to 2016. Oral methotrexate was started at 7.5 or 15 mg per week with a target dose of 25 mg per week. Between August and December 2020, all patients were contacted (telephonically) and data were obtained from clinic files to evaluate self-reported continuation/persistence of methotrexate and reasons for discontinuation. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier and cox-regression were used to assess methotrexate continuation rates and factors associated with its discontinuation. This study included 317 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with mean age and disease duration (at enrollment) of 43 years and 2 years; And positive rheumatoid factor and anti-CCP in 69 and 75%. At follow-up, 16 patients (5%) had died, whereas 103 (32.5%) had discontinued methotrexate. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the mean survival (continuation) time for methotrexate was 7.3 years (95% CI 7-7.6 years). The actuarial continuation/persistence of methotrexate at 3, 5 and 9 years was 92, 81 and 51%, respectively. Among those who discontinued methotrexate, common reasons were remission of disease, symptomatic adverse effects (intolerance), perceived lack of efficacy and socioeconomic reasons. On multivariable cox-regression, symptomatic adverse effects during the first 12-24 weeks (Hazard ratio, 95% CI 1.8 (1.2-2.8)) and anti-CCP positivity (Hazard ratio, 95% CI 0.6 (0.3-1.0)) were significantly associated with hazard of discontinuation. Persistence or continuation of methotrexate was found to be good and comparable to reports in other centers world-wide. Apart from remission, the most important cause of methotrexate discontinuation was symptomatic adverse effects (intolerance).

Conventional disease-modifying agents in rheumatoid arthritis - a review of their current use and role in treatment algorithms

Despite the development of targeted therapies, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) remain the cornerstone of treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A literature search was conducted on treatment recommendations and relevant papers regarding new insights on therapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis. Methotrexate is considered the “anchor drug” due to its high efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with other conventional and targeted agents. Leflunomide and sulfasalazine are sound alternatives, whereas (hydroxy)chloroquine is primarily used in combination with other csDMARDs.

Their use is encouraged in all treatment phases – in combination with targeted agents, and with other csDMARDs. Combining different csDMARDs is especially attractive in lower income settings given the evidence proving (almost) equal efficacy and safety of the csDMARD combination approach compared to the combination of targeted agents with a csDMARD.

The aim of this review is to provide a clinically oriented insight into the pharmacology of each csDMARD and their place in treatment algorithms.

Risk factors associated with initiation of a biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A nested case-control study on 34,925 patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) initiation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Using the 2002-2016 Korea National Health Insurance database, we conducted a nested case-control study on seropositive RA patients. Cases (bDMARD users) and controls (users of conventional synthetic DMARDs only) were 1:4 matched on the calendar year/month of RA diagnosis and index dates (bDMARD initiation dates). Potential risk factors from two time periods, 1-year post-RA-diagnosis and 1-year pre-index, were separately assessed on the association with bDMARD initiation by conditional logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The study included 6985 cases and 27,940 controls. Older age, female gender, use of methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, or tacrolimus as a first csDMARD, higher initial MTX dose, and initial csDMARD combination during 1-year post-diagnosis were negatively associated with later bDMARD initiation, while use of sulfasalazine as a first csDMARD, corticosteroid therapy, and higher maximal MTX dose were positively associated. Among covariates from 1-year period before bDMARD initiation, use of leflunomide, sulfasalazine, or tacrolimus, parenteral MTX, higher maximal MTX dose, corticosteroid, and csDMARD combination were positively associated with subsequent bDMARD initiation. Effects of comorbidities on bDMARD initiation were heterogenous across involved systems.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based nationwide study, we identified period-specific risk factors of bDMARD initiation among RA patients in Korea. Overall, initial aggressive RA treatment after diagnosis was associated with less use of later bDMARD, while highly intensive therapy observed just before bDMARD initiation rather reflects refractory nature of RA during this period, and did not prevent bDMARD use.

Centre effects and case-mix in early rheumatoid arthritis observational cohorts: a narrative review

OBJECTIVES

Observational cohort studies in early RA are a key source of evidence, despite inconsistencies in methodological approaches. This narrative review assesses the spectrum of methodologies used in addressing centre-level effect and case-mix adjustment in early RA observational cohort studies.

METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken to identify observational prospective cohorts of >100 patients recruited from two or more centres, within 2 years of an RA or early inflammatory arthritis diagnosis. References and author publication lists of all studies from eligible cohorts were assessed for additional cohorts.

RESULTS

Thirty-four unique cohorts were identified from 204 studies. Seven percent of studies considered centre in their analyses, most commonly as a fixed effect in regression modelling. Reporting of case-mix variables in analyses varied widely. The number of variables considered in case-mix adjustment was higher following publication of the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement in 2007.

CONCLUSION

Centre effect is unreported or inadequately accounted for in the majority of RA observational cohorts, potentially leading to spurious inferences and obstructing comparisons between studies. Inadequate case-mix adjustment precludes meaningful comparisons between centres. Appropriate methodology to account for centre and case-mix adjustment should be considered at the outset of analyses.

Assessing prognosis and prediction of treatment response in early rheumatoid arthritis: systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease associated with reduced quality of life and substantial costs. It is unclear which tests and assessment tools allow the best assessment of prognosis in people with early RA and whether or not variables predict the response of patients to different drug treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence on the use of selected tests and assessment tools in patients with early RA (1) in the evaluation of a prognosis (review 1) and (2) as predictive markers of treatment response (review 2).

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science Conference Proceedings; searched to September 2016), registers, key websites, hand-searching of reference lists of included studies and key systematic reviews and contact with experts.

STUDY SELECTION

Review 1 - primary studies on the development, external validation and impact of clinical prediction models for selected outcomes in adult early RA patients. Review 2 - primary studies on the interaction between selected baseline covariates and treatment (conventional and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) on salient outcomes in adult early RA patients.

RESULTS

Review 1 - 22 model development studies and one combined model development/external validation study reporting 39 clinical prediction models were included. Five external validation studies evaluating eight clinical prediction models for radiographic joint damage were also included. c-statistics from internal validation ranged from 0.63 to 0.87 for radiographic progression (different definitions, six studies) and 0.78 to 0.82 for the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Predictive performance in external validations varied considerably. Three models [(1) Active controlled Study of Patients receiving Infliximab for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis of Early onset (ASPIRE) C-reactive protein (ASPIRE CRP), (2) ASPIRE erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ASPIRE ESR) and (3) Behandelings Strategie (BeSt)] were externally validated using the same outcome definition in more than one population. Results of the random-effects meta-analysis suggested substantial uncertainty in the expected predictive performance of models in a new sample of patients. Review 2 - 12 studies were identified. Covariates examined included anti-citrullinated protein/peptide anti-body (ACPA) status, smoking status, erosions, rheumatoid factor status, C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, swollen joint count (SJC), body mass index and vascularity of synovium on power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS). Outcomes examined included erosions/radiographic progression, disease activity, physical function and Disease Activity Score-28 remission. There was statistical evidence to suggest that ACPA status, SJC and PDUS status at baseline may be treatment effect modifiers, but not necessarily that they are prognostic of response for all treatments. Most of the results were subject to considerable uncertainty and were not statistically significant.

LIMITATIONS

The meta-analysis in review 1 was limited by the availability of only a small number of external validation studies. Studies rarely investigated the interaction between predictors and treatment.

SUGGESTED RESEARCH PRIORITIES

Collaborative research (including the use of individual participant data) is needed to further develop and externally validate the clinical prediction models. The clinical prediction models should be validated with respect to individual treatments. Future assessments of treatment by covariate interactions should follow good statistical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Review 1 - uncertainty remains over the optimal prediction model(s) for use in clinical practice. Review 2 - in general, there was insufficient evidence that the effect of treatment depended on baseline characteristics.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016042402.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Drug-microbiota interactions and treatment response: Relevance to rheumatoid arthritis

Knowledge about associations between changes in the structure and/or function of intestinal microbes (the microbiota) and the pathogenesis of various diseases is expanding. However, interactions between the intestinal microbiota and different pharmaceuticals and the impact of these on responses to treatment are less well studied. Several mechanisms are known by which drug-microbiota interactions can influence drug bioavailability, efficacy, and/or toxicity. This includes direct activation or inactivation of drugs by microbial enzymes which can enhance or reduce drug effectiveness. The extensive metabolic capabilities of the intestinal microbiota make it a hotspot for drug modification. However, drugs can also influence the microbiota profoundly and change the outcome of interactions with the host. Additionally, individual microbiota signatures are unique, leading to substantial variation in host responses to particular drugs. In this review, we describe several known and emerging examples of how drug-microbiota interactions influence the responses of patients to treatment for various diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer. Focussing on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints which has been linked with microbial dysbiosis, we propose mechanisms by which the intestinal microbiota may affect responses to treatment with methotrexate which are highly variable. Furthering our knowledge of this subject will eventually lead to the adoption of new treatment strategies incorporating microbiota signatures to predict or improve treatment outcomes.

Twenty-Year Outcome and Association Between Early Treatment and Mortality and Disability in an Inception Cohort of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the Norfolk Arthritis Register

Objective

To describe the outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 20 years from symptom onset, and to assess the association between early treatment (with disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs/steroids) and mortality and disability during follow‐up.

Methods

Patients recruited to the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR) between 1990 and 1994 who met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism RA criteria at baseline were included in this analysis. Demographic and clinical variables were collected at baseline and at years 1–3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20. Disease activity (swollen joint count [SJC]/tender joint count [TJC]), disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index [HAQ DI]), and mortality over 20 years were determined. Associations between treatment group (early treatment [ET], treatment ≤6 months after symptom onset; late treatment [LT], treatment >6 months after symptom onset; never treatment [NT], no treatment) and mortality and disability were assessed using weighted pooled logistic regression and weighted multilevel mixed‐effects linear regression, respectively. Inverse weights were used to account for confounding by indication and censoring.

Results

This study included 602 patients with RA (median age 56 years [interquartile range 44–68 years]; 65.9% women). The median SJCs and TJCs were low during the follow‐up period (1–3 swollen joints and 3–6 tender joints). The median HAQ DI score increased after year 1 but remained at low/moderate levels (median 1.25 after year 10). The risk of mortality was reduced in the ET and LT groups compared with that in the NT group. The ET group and the NT group had comparable HAQ DI scores during the follow‐up period (β = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] −0.06, 0.12), while the HAQ DI score was increased in the LT group (for LT versus NT, β = 0.10 [95% CI 0.02, 0.17]).

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate the importance of early treatment with regard to the long‐term outcomes in patients with RA.

Adherence and Persistence with Methotrexate in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is typically suboptimal. Nonadherence has been associated with symptom worsening and increased disability. We systematically reviewed published clinical studies to evaluate methotrexate (MTX) adherence and persistence, factors associated with MTX adherence and persistence, and the effect of MTX nonadherence on clinical outcomes in RA.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched (inception to February 2016) using relevant keywords. Observational or interventional clinical studies in patients with RA that specifically reported adherence to or persistence with MTX were included. Data were extracted using a predesigned, standardized template that included study design, patient demographics, and relevant outcomes. Main outcomes were MTX adherence and persistence rates in patients with RA treated with MTX and factors associated with MTX adherence and persistence.

RESULTS

Of 365 references screened, 31 articles met inclusion criteria and another 10 were identified from searching reference lists. Estimates of MTX adherence varied from study to study because of heterogeneity in patient populations, duration of followup, definitions of adherence, and methods of assessment. Rates of MTX persistence ranged from 50% to 94% at 1 year and 25% to 79% at 5 years. No clear trends were identified in factors that influence MTX adherence and persistence. Two studies suggested that MTX adherence was associated with superior clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

MTX adherence and persistence are highly variable in patients with RA. Research is necessary to determine the effect of nonadherence on health outcomes and to identify independent predictors of nonadherence to inform evidence-based interventions.

Do rheumatologists know best? An outcomes study of inconsistent users of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

OBJECTIVE

Current recommendations advocate treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in all patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analyzed short-term disease outcome in patients according to the consistency of DMARD use in a clinical rheumatology cohort.

METHODS

Patients in an RA registry (n = 617) were studied for DMARD use at semi-annual study time points during the first 18 months of follow-up and were divided into 4 groups according to the number of study time points with any DMARD use [0-1 study time points (n = 31), 2 study time points (n = 24), 3 study time points (n = 77), and 4 study time points (n = 485)]. The primary outcome analyses were performed at 24 months and included Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28-CRP), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) change, Short Form Health Survey-12 physical and mental summary scores (SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS), EuroQol 5-Dimensional health index (EQ-5D), and radiographic progression. Unadjusted, adjusted, and analyses stratified for seropositivity and disease activity were performed. A secondary analysis investigated 36-month outcomes.

RESULTS

No significant 24-month outcome differences could be found between the DMARD use categories. For seropositive patients, there was evidence of a linear trend for SF-12 PCS (p = 0.02) and EQ-5D (p = 0.01) with worse outcomes for inconsistent DMARD users. At 36 months, there was a linear trend for higher DAS28-CRP scores for inconsistent users (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we found poor correlation between inconsistent DMARD use and short-term disease outcome. However, outcome in the longer term could be negatively influenced by inconsistent DMARD use, as well as short-term outcome in seropositive patients.