Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a cohort study in the United Kingdom

Patterns and determinants of response to novel therapies in juvenile and adult-onset polyarthritis

Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) have revolutionized the management of multiple rheumatic inflammatory conditions. Among these, polyarticular JIA (pJIA) and RA display similarities in terms of disease pathophysiology and response pattern to b/tsDMARDs. Indeed, the therapeutic efficacy of novel targeted drugs is variable among individual patients, in both RA and pJIA. The mechanisms and determinants of this heterogeneous response are diverse and complex, such that the development of true 'precision'-medicine strategies has proven highly challenging. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiological, patient-specific, drug-specific and environmental factors contributing to individual therapeutic response in pJIA in comparison with what is known in RA. Although some biomarkers have been identified that stratify with respect to the likelihood of either therapeutic response or non-response, few have proved useful in clinical practice so far, likely due to the complexity of treatment-response mechanisms. Consequently, we propose a pragmatic, patient-centred and clinically based approach, i.e. personalized instead of biomarker-based precision medicine in JIA.

Treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

In the past two decades, the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has evolved markedly, owing to the availability of a growing number of novel, potent and relatively safe therapeutic agents and the shift of management strategies towards early achievement of disease remission. However, JIA encompasses a heterogeneous group of diseases that require distinct treatment approaches. Furthermore, some old drugs, such as methotrexate, sulfasalazine and intraarticular glucocorticoids, still maintain an important therapeutic role. In the past 5 years, information on the efficacy and safety of drug therapies for JIA has been further enriched through the accomplishment of several randomized controlled trials of newer biologic and synthetic targeted DMARDs. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. A multinational collaborative effort has led to the development of the recommendations for the treat-to-target strategy in JIA. There is currently increasing interest in establishing the optimal time and modality for discontinuation of treatment in children with JIA who achieve sustained clinical remission. The aim of this Review is to summarize the current evidence and discuss the therapeutic approaches to the management of non-systemic phenotypes of JIA, including oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

T lymphocytes-related cell network in the pathogenesis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a key point for personalized treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of arthritis of unknown origin occurring in children under 16 years of age and persisting for at least 6 weeks. Given that JIA is an inflammatory disorder, treatment strategies, including also biologicals, are focused on suppressing excessive inflammation. The finding that different patients display different responses to biological drugs supports the concept that different pathogenic mechanisms can exist in JIA, with specific cellular and molecular mechanisms driving inflammation in each patient. The aim of this review is to highlight the most recent advances in understanding the role of immune cells in JIA pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review encompasses the role of the different cell subsets involved in sustaining inflammation in JIA, with a particular emphasis on T cells, as they orchestrate both innate and adaptive auto-reactive immunity in affected joints.

SUMMARY

The characterization of the cellular and molecular pathways supporting inflammation will be crucial to design novel therapeutic approaches in the context of personalized medicine.

Children with extended oligoarticular and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis have alterations in B and T follicular cell subsets in peripheral blood and a cytokine profile sustaining B cell activation

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of this study was to characterise the frequency and phenotype of B, T follicular helper (Tfh) and T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells in peripheral blood and the cytokine environment present in circulation in children with extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (extended oligo JIA) and polyarticular JIA (poly JIA) when compared with healthy controls, children with persistent oligoarticular JIA (persistent oligo JIA) and adult JIA patients.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 105 JIA patients (children and adults) and 50 age-matched healthy individuals. The frequency and phenotype of B, Tfh and Tfr cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Serum levels of APRIL, BAFF, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-21, IL-22, IFN-γ, PD-1, PD-L1, sCD40L, CXCL13 and TNF were measured by multiplex bead-based immunoassay and/or ELISA in all groups included.

RESULTS

The frequency of B, Tfh and Tfr cells was similar between JIA patients and controls. Children with extended oligo JIA and poly JIA, but not persistent oligo JIA, had significantly lower frequencies of plasmablasts, regulatory T cells and higher levels of Th17-like Tfh cells in circulation when compared with controls. Furthermore, APRIL, BAFF, IL-6 and IL-17A serum levels were significantly higher in paediatric extended oligo JIA and poly JIA patients when compared with controls. These immunological alterations were not found in adult JIA patients in comparison to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest a potential role and/or activation profile of B and Th17-like Tfh cells in the pathogenesis of extended oligo JIA and poly JIA, but not persistent oligo JIA.

The association between hypogammaglobulinemia severity and infection risk in rituximab-treated patients with childhood-onset idiopathic nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hypogammaglobulinemia is a major adverse effect from rituximab. However, the association between rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia and infection frequency is unknown.

METHODS

Patients who received rituximab for complicated nephrotic syndrome between February 2006 and October 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Infections requiring antibacterial or antiviral agents or hospitalization were identified, and the characteristics of infections were compared according to infection type.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty patients were enrolled. Fifty infection events were detected in 36 patients, 45 infection events in 32 patients required hospitalization, and 1 severe infection event required intensive care unit admission. In eight patients who developed severe hypogammaglobulinemia (serum IgG level < 200 mg/dL) for more than 1 year after rituximab treatment, eight infections occurred in six patients; six of these infections did not occur during the period of severe hypogammaglobulinemia. Febrile neutropenia accounted for 54.2% (13/24) of all infections among the patients with hypogammaglobulinemia. The incidence of infections was 0.028 (95% confidence interval = 0.017-0.448), 0.071 (95% [CI] = 0.041-0.114), and 0.096 (95% [CI] = 0.019-0.282) patient-years in patients with normal serum IgG levels and those with mild and severe hypogammaglobulinemia, respectively. Immunoglobulin replacement therapy was not administered to any patients except for the treatment of infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed no statistically significant association between hypogammaglobulinemia severity and infection rate. In addition, the frequency of infection was relatively low even in patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia, suggesting that immunoglobulin replacement therapy may not be necessary for rituximab-treated patients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Pediatric autoimmune blistering disorders - a five-year demographic profile and therapy experience

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature on pediatric autoimmune bullous disorders (AIBD) in the Indian population. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinico-demographic profile of pediatric AIBDs in our patients and their response to various therapeutic modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of patients enrolled in our immunobullous disease clinic from November 2013 to August 2019. The clinical records of all the patients aged less than 18 years old with a definitive diagnosis of AIBD were reviewed based on clinical, histopathological, and immunological features.

RESULTS

Forty out of 1209 patients with AIBD (3.3%) belonged to the pediatric age group. Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) was the most common AIBD (24, 60%) followed by chronic bullous disease of childhood (CBDC) at 15% (6) and pemphigus foliaceus (PV) at 12.5% (5). Subepidermal blistering disorders had a significantly younger age of onset (P = 0.04) compared to intraepidermal blistering disorders but higher frequency of achieving complete remission off therapy (P = 0.02). The mean time to achieve remission was significantly shorter in PV patients treated with a combination of rituximab and corticosteroids compared to those treated with oral prednisolone and oral immunosuppressive adjuvants (P = 0.001). Rituximab was tolerated well in all 12 pemphigus patients. Oral lesions in PV patients took significantly longer time to achieve remission compared to the cutaneous lesions (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

PV was the most common pediatric AIBD in Indian patients. Rituximab was a safe and effective modality of treatment in moderate to severe pediatric pemphigus.

Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. With the gradual expansion of the incidence of JIA in the population, the pathogenesis and treatment of JIA were further explored and analyzed, and JIA has achieved some success in drug therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A systemic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Through the searching of clinical trials of JIA in recent years, we summarized the progress of the clinical treatment of JIA.

RESULTS

The main treatment drugs for JIA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents. So far, a variety of biological agents targeting the cytokines and receptors involved in its pathogenesis have been gradually approved for JIA in many countries. The application of biological agents in JIA showed good efficacy and safety, bringing unprecedented experience to children and adolescents with JIA.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential and advantages of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA are significant, and the application of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA will be more and more common.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibition Before and After Rituximab Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: What Shall We Expect? A Pilot Study

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody against B cell antigen CD20, has been used in patients with recalcitrant juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA) with some efficacy.1,2 The resetting of peripheral B cells promoted by RTX represents quite an interesting option in autoimmune diseases such as JIA, not only for the immediate effect but also for the possible use of other therapies that might be necessary to achieve disease control.

Safety updates in novel therapeutics for pediatric rheumatic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics and novel targeted therapeutics have transformed the management of pediatric rheumatic diseases over the past two decades; however, questions about short-term and long-term safety remain. Safety data gathered from recent clinical trials, long-term extensions of prior trials, registries, and other real-world evidence are summarized here for biologics and novel therapeutics commonly prescribed for pediatric rheumatic diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

With nearly 20 years of therapeutic experience, tumor necrosis inhibitors (TNFi) are generally well tolerated, although infections, malignancy, and development of new autoimmunity remain a concern. Risk of infections may be higher in IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors, and lower in abatacept, compared with TNFi. Safety data for B-cell-targeted therapeutics and janus kinase inhibitors are emerging, but remain limited, especially in children.

SUMMARY

Biologic and novel targeted therapeutics offer a promising future for children with pediatric rheumatic disease. However, long-term safety data in children remain limited for several agents. With any therapeutic option, both short-term and long-term safety concerns must be weighed against individual clinical needs when choosing the optimal treatment for each child.

New-onset Hypogammaglobulinemia and Infectious Complications Associated with Rituximab Use in Childhood-onset Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the incidence and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinemia and infectious complications associated with rituximab treatment in childhood-onset rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of patients (n = 85) treated at Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) from 2009 to 2019. Study subjects included patients (ages 6 to 24) who received rituximab for the treatment of a childhood-onset rheumatic disease.

RESULTS

New-onset hypogammaglobulinemia developed in 23 (27.1%) patients within 18 months of rituximab induction treatment. 22 patients (25.9%) developed at least one infectious complication in the 18 months following the first rituximab infusion; of these, 11 (50%) had serious infections requiring inpatient treatment. After adjusting for potential confounders, exposure to pulse corticosteroid therapy in the month prior to rituximab use was a significant predictor of both new-onset hypogammaglobulinemia (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.07-16.0; p = 0.044) and infectious complications (OR 15.3; 95% CI 3.04-126.8; p = 0.003). Post-rituximab hypogammaglobulinemia was the strongest predictor of serious infectious complications (OR 7.89; 95% CI 1.41-65.6; p = 0.028). Younger age at rituximab use was also a significant predictor of new-onset hypogammaglobulinemia (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.97; p = 0.021). Compared with other rheumatic diseases, patients with vasculitis had a higher likelihood of developing infectious complications, including serious infections.

CONCLUSION

Although rituximab was well tolerated in terms of infectious complications in the majority of patients with childhood-onset rheumatic diseases, a substantial proportion developed new-onset hypogammaglobulinemia and infectious complications following treatment. Our study highlights a role for heightened vigilance of rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia and infections in pediatric patients with rheumatic conditions.

Advancing the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis has undergone substantial changes in recent decades. These changes are partly due to the availability of new treatments, mainly biological agents, as well as developments in treatment strategies, including a focus on concepts such as treat-to-target. In addition, the creation of large paediatric research networks has improved patient access to, and design of, clinical trials for rare paediatric diseases. Although these advances have resulted in improvements in care for most patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, certain subgroups of patients continue to have a poor prognosis. Further research aims to identify patients in these subgroups early, to personalise their care, improve functional outcomes, and minimise long-term damage and harm. Optimising the duration of therapy for those individuals who require systemic immunosuppression is also of importance. Incorporation of novel biomarkers in combination with validated clinical measures in an effort to predict outcomes and target therapy accordingly is an exciting development.

Recent progress in the treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the joints and other organs that occurs in 1 in 1,000 children in the United States. Given the various categories of JIA, interpretation of the literature can be difficult. In this review, new developments in understanding non-systemic JIA and its treatment will be covered. Recent advances in the journey toward personalized treatment in JIA will be highlighted, including a review of currently available biologic modifiers. Uveitis and the temporomandibular joint will be discussed as particularly challenging treatment issues. Recent guideline updates and literature-guided treatment decisions will be reviewed.

Association of Rituximab Use With Adverse Events in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

IMPORTANCE

Rituximab is among the most frequently used immunotherapies in pediatrics. Few studies have reported long-term adverse events associated with its use for children.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of rituximab and to assess whether its use is associated with short- or long-term adverse events, infections, or time to immune reconstitution in a diverse group of young people.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study included 468 patients aged younger than 21 years who received rituximab for diverse indications between October 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, at Texas Children's Hospital, a large pediatric referral hospital. Patterns of adverse events, infections, and immune recovery are described. Data analyses were conducted from December 2019 to June 2020.

EXPOSURE

One or more doses of rituximab.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Adverse drug events (eg, anaphylaxis), incidence of mild and severe infections, and time to recovery of B lymphocyte subset counts and immunoglobulin levels. Survival models and logistic regression analyses and were used to identify associated risk factors of infectious and noninfectious adverse drug events.

RESULTS

We identified 468 patients receiving at least 1 dose of rituximab. The total follow-up time was 11 713 person-months. Of the 468 patients, 293 (62.6%) were female, the median (interquartile range) age at receipt of dose was 14.3 (9.9-16.8) years, and 209 (44.7%) were self-reported White Hispanic. Adverse events associated with rituximab infusion occurred in 72 patients (15.4%), and anaphylaxis occurred in 17 patients (3.6%). Long-term adverse events, such as prolonged neutropenia and leukoencephalopathy, were absent. Infections occurred in 224 patients (47.9%); 84 patients (17.9%) had severe infections, and 3 patients (0.6%) had lethal infections. Concurrent use of intravenous chemotherapy, treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, neutropenia, and use of intravenous immunoglobulin were associated with increased risk of infection. Among 135 patients (28.8%) followed up to B cell count recovery, CD19+ or CD20+ cell numbers normalized in a median of 9.0 months (interquartile range, 5.9-14.4 months) following rituximab use; 48 of 95 patients (51%) evaluated beyond a year had low-for-age B cell counts. Recovery of CD27+ memory B cell number occurred in a median of 15.7 months (interquartile range, 6.0-22.7 months). Among patients with normal baseline values, low immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels developed in 67 of 289 patients (23.2%) and low IgM levels in 118 of 255 patients (40.8%); of these patients evaluated beyond 12 months from rituximab, 16 of 117 (13.7%) had persistently low IgG and 37 (33.9%) of 109 had persistently low IgM.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Rituximab is well tolerated among young people and is associated with few serious adverse events, but infections are common, corresponding to a prolonged period of B cell count recovery often lasting for longer than a year. Further examination of strategies to prevent infections following rituximab should be pursued.

Beyond the guidelines management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report of a girl with polyarticular disease refractory to multiple treatment options and Leri Weill syndrome

BACKGROUND

The last two decades brought new treatment options and high quality guidelines into the paediatric rheumatologic practice. Nevertheless, a number of patients still present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge due to combination of vague symptoms and unresponsiveness to available treatment modalities.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of sixteen years old girl suffering from polyarticular type of juvenile idiopathic arthritis refractory to multiple treatment options. She first presented at the age of 4 with swelling and contractures of both knees. Her symptoms were initially unresponsive to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and progressed despite treatment with intraarticular and systemic glucocorticoids and methotrexate. Throughout the years, she received several biologics together with continuous administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs as well as intraarticular and systemic glucocorticoids in disease flares. However, none of this options  provided a permanent remission, so various other modalities, as well as other possible diagnoses were constantly being considered. Eventually she became dependent on a daily dose of systemic glucocorticoids. In 2018, the treatment with Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib was initiated, which led to gradual amelioration of musculoskeletal symptoms, improvement of inflammatory markers and overall well-being, as well as to the weaning of systemic glucocorticoids. As the swelling of the wrists subsided for the first time in many years, Madelung's deformity was noticed, first clinically, and later radiographically as well. Genetic analysis revealed short-stature homeobox gene deficiency and confirmed the diagnosis of Leri Weill syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report emphasizes the need for reporting refractory, complicated cases from everyday clinical practice in order to build-up the overall knowledge and share experience which is complementary to available guidelines. Individual reports of difficult to treat cases, especially when additional diagnoses are involved, can be helpful for physicians treating patients with common rheumatological diseases such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Current Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease and an exclusion diagnosis that includes all forms of arthritis that persists for more than 6 weeks under the age of 16. Although there is not yet a cure for JIA, and recent advances in the therapeutic field have created a more hopeful present and future for the patients. In the past, therapies for JIA have depended on non-steroidal medication, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and corticosteroids. However, over the last decades, the advent of biologic therapies in JIA contributed to the preservation of functional activity, control of pain, avoidance of joint damage, and extra-articular manifestations. Furthermore, over the last years, international institutions, such as the American College of Rheumatology, have released recommendations and guidelines for rheumatologists for optimal JIA management. All the above have revolutionized the treatment of JIA with promising outcomes. To this end, the relevant literature is reviewed and discussed appropriately.

Case Report: Adult Still's Disease in an Alemtuzumab-Treated Multiple Sclerosis Patient

Background

Autoimmune adverse events are the most relevant risks of alemtuzumab therapy. We present a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, who developed adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) following alemtuzumab treatment.

Case Presentation

The patient suffered from sore throat, swallowing difficulties, high spiking quotidian fever, generalized skin rash, arthritis, and myalgia 2 months after the second course of alemtuzumab. Laboratory tests revealed elevated acute-phase reactants, anemia, neutrophilic leukocytosis, and thrombocytosis. Serum calprotectin, interleukin-2, and interleukin-6 levels were strongly increased. Autoimmune, rheumatic, neoplastic, infectious, and granulomatous disorders were excluded. The NLRP1 and NLRP3 gene test, which was performed under the presumption of a cryopyrin-associated autoinflammatory syndrome, was negative. Based on the Yamaguchi and Fautrel criteria, and supported by the histological findings from a skin biopsy of the rash, the diagnosis of AOSD was established. Therapy with the anti-IL-1 agent (anakinra) led to a significant improvement of symptoms and blood parameters. However, anakinra had to be converted to rituximab due to generalized drug eruption. Following therapy with rituximab, the patient has fully recovered.

Conclusion

The current case highlights AOSD as another rare and potentially life-threatening secondary autoinflammatory/autoimmune event following alemtuzumab treatment.

Single-cycle rituximab-induced immunologic changes in children: Enhanced in neuroimmunologic disease?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the immunologic impact of a single cycle of rituximab (RTX) in children and adolescents with immune-mediated disorders, we evaluated B cells and immunoglobulin levels of 20 patients with neuroimmunologic, nephrologic, dermatologic, and rheumatologic disorders treated under recommended guidelines.

METHODS

Retrospective study of immunologic changes in children (aged ≤18 years) diagnosed with immune-mediated disorders in which RTX was prescribed between June 2014 and February 2019. Patients were excluded if they had prior diagnosis of malignant disease or primary immunodeficiency. Patients were clinically and immunologically followed up every 3 months. Only patients having received a single cycle of RTX and with a follow-up greater than 12 months were included in the analysis of persistent dysgammaglobulinemia.

RESULTS

Twenty children were included. Median age at RTX treatment was 12.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6-15.5 years). Median follow-up was 12.6 months (IQR 10.2-24 months). Of the 14 patients eligible for persistent dysgammaglobulinemia analysis (3 had received RTX retreatment, 2 had <12 months post-RTX follow-up, and in 1 data for this time point was missing), 2/14 (14%) remained with complete B-cell depletion, and 5/14 (36%) had dysgammaglobulinemia. Patients with dysgammaglobulinemia were younger (7.8 vs 15.6 years, p = 0.072), had more underlying neuroimmunologic diseases (5/5 vs 0/9, p < 0.001), and had received more frequently concentrated doses of RTX (3/5 vs 1/9, p = 0.05) than patients without dysgammaglobulinemia. Kinetics of immunoglobulins in the 20 patients revealed a decrease as early as 3 months after RTX in patients with neuroimmunologic disorders.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, single-cycle RTX-induced dysgammaglobulinemia was enhanced in patients with neuroimmunologic diseases. Further studies are needed to confirm this observation.