1
|
Blommaert J, De Saint‐Hubert M, Depuydt T, Oldehinkel E, Poortmans P, Amant F, Lambrecht M. Challenges and opportunities for proton therapy during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:767-774. [PMID: 37491770 PMCID: PMC10993337 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
During pregnancy, the use of radiation therapy for cancer treatment is often considered impossible due to the assumed associated fetal risks. However, suboptimal treatment of pregnant cancer patients and unjustifiable delay in radiation therapy until after delivery can be harmful for both patient and child. In non-pregnant patients, proton-radiation therapy is increasingly administered because of its favorable dosimetric properties compared with photon-radiation therapy. Although data on the use of pencil beam scanning proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy are scarce, different case reports and dosimetric studies have indicated a more than 10-fold reduction in fetal radiation exposure compared with photon-radiation therapy. Nonetheless, the implementation of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy requires complex fetal dosimetry for the neutron-dominated out-of-field radiation dose and faces a lack of clinical guidelines. Further exploration and standardization of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy will be necessary to improve radiotherapeutic management of pregnant women with cancer and further reduce risks for their offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation OncologyIridium Netwerk & University of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
| | - Frederic Amant
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van LeeuwenhoekNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division Gynecologic OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Saint-Hubert M, Boissonnat G, Schneider U, Bäumer C, Verbeek N, Esser J, Wulff J, Stuckmann F, Suesselbeck F, Nabha R, Dabin J, Vasi F, Radonic S, Rodriguez M, Simon AC, Journy N, Timmermann B, Thierry-Chef I, Brualla L. Complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment for photon and proton therapy techniques including imaging procedures. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1222800. [PMID: 37795436 PMCID: PMC10546320 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1222800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In radiotherapy, especially when treating children, minimising exposure of healthy tissue can prevent the development of adverse outcomes, including second cancers. In this study we propose a validated Monte Carlo framework to evaluate the complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment. Materials and methods Organ doses were calculated for treatment of a diffuse midline glioma (50.4 Gy with 1.8 Gy per fraction) on a 5-year-old anthropomorphic phantom with 3D-conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Doses from computed tomography (CT) for planning and on-board imaging for positioning (kV-cone beam CT and X-ray imaging) accounted for the estimate of the exposure of the patient including imaging therapeutic dose. For dose calculations we used validated Monte Carlo-based tools (PRIMO, TOPAS, PENELOPE), while lifetime attributable risk (LAR) was estimated from dose-response relationships for cancer induction, proposed by Schneider et al. Results Out-of-field organ dose equivalent data of proton therapy are lower, with doses between 0.6 mSv (testes) and 120 mSv (thyroid), when compared to photon therapy revealing the highest out-of-field doses for IMRT ranging between 43 mSv (testes) and 575 mSv (thyroid). Dose delivered by CT ranged between 0.01 mSv (testes) and 72 mSv (scapula) while a single imaging positioning ranged between 2 μSv (testes) and 1.3 mSv (thyroid) for CBCT and 0.03 μSv (testes) and 48 μSv (scapula) for X-ray. Adding imaging dose from CT and daily CBCT to the therapeutic demonstrated an important contribution of imaging to the overall radiation burden in the course of treatment, which is subsequently used to predict the LAR, for selected organs. Conclusion The complete patient exposure during paediatric brain cancer treatment was estimated by combining the results from different Monte Carlo-based dosimetry tools, showing that proton therapy allows significant reduction of the out-of-field doses and secondary cancer risk in selected organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Uwe Schneider
- Physik Institut, Universitat Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Essen, Germany
- Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Nico Verbeek
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Esser
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- Faculty of Mathematics and Science Institute of Physics and Medical Physics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Stuckmann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Finja Suesselbeck
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Racell Nabha
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Jérémie Dabin
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Fabiano Vasi
- Physik Institut, Universitat Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Miguel Rodriguez
- Hospital Paitilla, Panama City, Panama
- Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y de Alta Tecnología INDICASAT-AIP, Panama City, Panama
| | | | - Neige Journy
- INSERM U1018, Paris Sud-Paris Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Essen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Brualla
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Essen, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pazzaglia S, Eidemüller M, Lumniczky K, Mancuso M, Ramadan R, Stolarczyk L, Moertl S. Out-of-field effects: lessons learned from partial body exposure. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:485-504. [PMID: 36001144 PMCID: PMC9722818 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-00988-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Partial body exposure and inhomogeneous dose delivery are features of the majority of medical and occupational exposure situations. However, mounting evidence indicates that the effects of partial body exposure are not limited to the irradiated area but also have systemic effects that are propagated outside the irradiated field. It was the aim of the "Partial body exposure" session within the MELODI workshop 2020 to discuss recent developments and insights into this field by covering clinical, epidemiological, dosimetric as well as mechanistic aspects. Especially the impact of out-of-field effects on dysfunctions of immune cells, cardiovascular diseases and effects on the brain were debated. The presentations at the workshop acknowledged the relevance of out-of-field effects as components of the cellular and organismal radiation response. Furthermore, their importance for the understanding of radiation-induced pathologies, for the discovery of early disease biomarkers and for the identification of high-risk organs after inhomogeneous exposure was emphasized. With the rapid advancement of clinical treatment modalities, including new dose rates and distributions a better understanding of individual health risk is urgently needed. To achieve this, a deeper mechanistic understanding of out-of-field effects in close connection to improved modelling was suggested as priorities for future research. This will support the amelioration of risk models and the personalization of risk assessments for cancer and non-cancer effects after partial body irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Pazzaglia
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, ENEA CR-Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - M. Eidemüller
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - K. Lumniczky
- Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, National Public Health Centre, Albert Florian u. 2-6, 1097 Budapest, Hungary
| | - M. Mancuso
- Laboratory of Biomedical Technologies, ENEA CR-Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Rome, Italy
| | - R. Ramadan
- Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - L. Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - S. Moertl
- Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knežević Ž, Stolarczyk L, Ambrožová I, Caballero-Pacheco MÁ, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Domingo C, Jeleń K, Kopeć R, Krzempek D, Majer M, Miljanić S, Mojżeszek N, Romero-Expósito M, Martínez-Rovira I, Harrison RM, Olko P. Out-of-Field Doses Produced by a Proton Scanning Beam Inside Pediatric Anthropomorphic Phantoms and Their Comparison With Different Photon Modalities. Front Oncol 2022; 12:904563. [PMID: 35957900 PMCID: PMC9361051 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Since 2010, EURADOS Working Group 9 (Radiation Dosimetry in Radiotherapy) has been involved in the investigation of secondary and scattered radiation doses in X-ray and proton therapy, especially in the case of pediatric patients. The main goal of this paper is to analyze and compare out-of-field neutron and non-neutron organ doses inside 5- and 10-year-old pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms for the treatment of a 5-cm-diameter brain tumor. Proton irradiations were carried out at the Cyclotron Centre Bronowice in IFJ PAN Krakow Poland using a pencil beam scanning technique (PBS) at a gantry with a dedicated scanning nozzle (IBA Proton Therapy System, Proteus 235). Thermoluminescent and radiophotoluminescent dosimeters were used for non-neutron dose measurements while secondary neutrons were measured with track-etched detectors. Out-of-field doses measured using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) were compared with previous measurements performed within a WG9 for three different photon radiotherapy techniques: 1) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 2) three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CDRT) performed on a Varian Clinac 2300 linear accelerator (LINAC) in the Centre of Oncology, Krakow, Poland, and 3) Gamma Knife surgery performed on the Leksell Gamma Knife (GK) at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia. Phantoms and detectors used in experiments as well as the target location were the same for both photon and proton modalities. The total organ dose equivalent expressed as the sum of neutron and non-neutron components in IMPT was found to be significantly lower (two to three orders of magnitude) in comparison with the different photon radiotherapy techniques for the same delivered tumor dose. For IMPT, neutron doses are lower than non-neutron doses close to the target but become larger than non-neutron doses further away from the target. Results of WG9 studies have provided out-of-field dose levels required for an extensive set of radiotherapy techniques, including proton therapy, and involving a complete description of organ doses of pediatric patients. Such studies are needed for validating mathematical models and Monte Carlo simulation tools for out-of-field dosimetry which is essential for dedicated epidemiological studies which evaluate the risk of second cancers and other late effects for pediatric patients treated with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Željka Knežević
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
- *Correspondence: Željka Knežević,
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - Iva Ambrožová
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, CAS, Řež, Czechia
| | | | - Marie Davídková
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, CAS, Řež, Czechia
| | | | | | - Kinga Jeleń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAN, Krakow, Poland
- Tadeusz Kosciuszko Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland
| | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | | | | | | | | | - Maite Romero-Expósito
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Roger M. Harrison
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAN, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mares V, Farah J, De Saint-Hubert M, Domański S, Domingo C, Dommert M, Kłodowska M, Krzempek K, Kuć M, Martínez-Rovira I, Michaś E, Mojżeszek N, Murawski Ł, Ploc O, Romero-Expósito M, Tisi M, Trompier F, Van Hoey O, Van Ryckeghem L, Wielunski M, Harrison RM, Stolarczyk L, Olko P. Neutron Radiation Dose Measurements in a Scanning Proton Therapy Room: Can Parents Remain Near Their Children During Treatment? Front Oncol 2022; 12:903706. [PMID: 35912238 PMCID: PMC9330633 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.903706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to characterize the neutron radiation field inside a scanning proton therapy treatment room including the impact of different pediatric patient sizes. Materials and Methods Working Group 9 of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has performed a comprehensive measurement campaign to measure neutron ambient dose equivalent, H*(10), at eight different positions around 1-, 5-, and 10-year-old pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms irradiated with a simulated brain tumor treatment. Several active detector systems were used. Results The neutron dose mapping within the gantry room showed that H*(10) values significantly decreased with distance and angular deviation with respect to the beam axis. A maximum value of about 19.5 µSv/Gy was measured along the beam axis at 1 m from the isocenter for a 10-year-old pediatric phantom at 270° gantry angle. A minimum value of 0.1 µSv/Gy was measured at a distance of 2.25 m perpendicular to the beam axis for a 1-year-old pediatric phantom at 140° gantry angle. The H*(10) dependence on the size of the pediatric patient was observed. At 270° gantry position, the measured neutron H*(10) values for the 10-year-old pediatric phantom were up to 20% higher than those measured for the 5-year-old and up to 410% higher than for the 1-year-old phantom, respectively. Conclusions Using active neutron detectors, secondary neutron mapping was performed to characterize the neutron field generated during proton therapy of pediatric patients. It is shown that the neutron ambient dose equivalent H*(10) significantly decreases with distance and angle with respect to the beam axis. It is reported that the total neutron exposure of a person staying at a position perpendicular to the beam axis at a distance greater than 2 m from the isocenter remains well below the dose limit of 1 mSv per year for the general public (recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection) during the entire treatment course with a target dose of up to 60 Gy. This comprehensive analysis is key for general neutron shielding issues, for example, the safe operation of anesthetic equipment. However, it also enables the evaluation of whether it is safe for parents to remain near their children during treatment to bring them comfort. Currently, radiation protection protocols prohibit the occupancy of the treatment room during beam delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir Mares
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Vladimir Mares,
| | - Jad Farah
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-Santé, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Marijke De Saint-Hubert
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center, (SCK CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety (EHS), Mol, Belgium
| | - Szymon Domański
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Radiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division, Otwock-Świerk, Poland
| | - Carles Domingo
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Martin Dommert
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Magdalena Kłodowska
- Cambridge University Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Medical Physics, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katarzyna Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, (IFJ PAN), Krakow, Poland
| | - Michał Kuć
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Radiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division, Otwock-Świerk, Poland
| | | | - Edyta Michaś
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Radiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division, Otwock-Świerk, Poland
| | - Natalia Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, (IFJ PAN), Krakow, Poland
| | - Łukasz Murawski
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Radiological Metrology and Biomedical Physics Division, Otwock-Świerk, Poland
| | - Ondrej Ploc
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS), Prague, Czechia
| | | | - Marco Tisi
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - François Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-Santé, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Olivier Van Hoey
- Belgian Nuclear Research Center, (SCK CEN), Institute for Environment, Health and Safety (EHS), Mol, Belgium
| | - Laurent Van Ryckeghem
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSE-Santé, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Marek Wielunski
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Roger M. Harrison
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, (IFJ PAN), Krakow, Poland
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pawel Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, (IFJ PAN), Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
De Saint-Hubert M, Verbeek N, Bäumer C, Esser J, Wulff J, Nabha R, Van Hoey O, Dabin J, Stuckmann F, Vasi F, Radonic S, Boissonnat G, Schneider U, Rodriguez M, Timmermann B, Thierry-Chef I, Brualla L. Validation of a Monte Carlo Framework for Out-of-Field Dose Calculations in Proton Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:882489. [PMID: 35756661 PMCID: PMC9213663 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy enables to deliver highly conformed dose distributions owing to the characteristic Bragg peak and the finite range of protons. However, during proton therapy, secondary neutrons are created, which can travel long distances and deposit dose in out-of-field volumes. This out-of-field absorbed dose needs to be considered for radiation-induced secondary cancers, which are particularly relevant in the case of pediatric treatments. Unfortunately, no method exists in clinics for the computation of the out-of-field dose distributions in proton therapy. To help overcome this limitation, a computational tool has been developed based on the Monte Carlo code TOPAS. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of this tool in comparison to experimental data obtained from an anthropomorphic phantom irradiation. An anthropomorphic phantom of a 5-year-old child (ATOM, CIRS) was irradiated for a brain tumor treatment in an IBA Proteus Plus facility using a pencil beam dedicated nozzle. The treatment consisted of three pencil beam scanning fields employing a lucite range shifter. Proton energies ranged from 100 to 165 MeV. A median dose of 50.4 Gy(RBE) with 1.8 Gy(RBE) per fraction was prescribed to the initial planning target volume (PTV), which was located in the cerebellum. Thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs), namely, Li-7-enriched LiF : Mg, Ti (MTS-7) type, were used to detect gamma radiation, which is produced by nuclear reactions, and secondary as well as recoil protons created out-of-field by secondary neutrons. Li-6-enriched LiF : Mg,Cu,P (MCP-6) was combined with Li-7-enriched MCP-7 to measure thermal neutrons. TLDs were calibrated in Co-60 and reported on absorbed dose in water per target dose (μGy/Gy) as well as thermal neutron dose equivalent per target dose (μSv/Gy). Additionally, bubble detectors for personal neutron dosimetry (BD-PND) were used for measuring neutrons (>50 keV), which were calibrated in a Cf-252 neutron beam to report on neutron dose equivalent dose data. The Monte Carlo code TOPAS (version 3.6) was run using a phase-space file containing 1010 histories reaching an average standard statistical uncertainty of less than 0.2% (coverage factor k = 1) on all voxels scoring more than 50% of the maximum dose. The primary beam was modeled following a Fermi–Eyges description of the spot envelope fitted to measurements. For the Monte Carlo simulation, the chemical composition of the tissues represented in ATOM was employed. The dose was tallied as dose-to-water, and data were normalized to the target dose (physical dose) to report on absorbed doses per target dose (mSv/Gy) or neutron dose equivalent per target dose (μSv/Gy), while also an estimate of the total organ dose was provided for a target dose of 50.4 Gy(RBE). Out-of-field doses showed absorbed doses that were 5 to 6 orders of magnitude lower than the target dose. The discrepancy between TLD data and the corresponding scored values in the Monte Carlo calculations involving proton and gamma contributions was on average 18%. The comparison between the neutron equivalent doses between the Monte Carlo simulation and the measured neutron doses was on average 8%. Organ dose calculations revealed the highest dose for the thyroid, which was 120 mSv, while other organ doses ranged from 18 mSv in the lungs to 0.6 mSv in the testes. The proposed computational method for routine calculation of the out-of-the-field dose in proton therapy produces results that are compatible with the experimental data and allow to calculate out-of-field organ doses during proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke De Saint-Hubert
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Nico Verbeek
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Johannes Esser
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Mathematics and Science Institute of Physics and Medical Physics. Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jörg Wulff
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - Racell Nabha
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Olivier Van Hoey
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Jérémie Dabin
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Florian Stuckmann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Mathematics and Science Institute of Physics and Medical Physics. Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Klinikum Fulda GAG, Universitätsmedizin Marburg, Fulda, Zurich, Germany
| | - Fabiano Vasi
- Physik Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Uwe Schneider
- Physik Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Miguel Rodriguez
- Hospital Paitilla, Panama City, Panama.,Instituto de Investigaciones Cientificas y de Alta Tecnología INDICASAT-AIP, Panama City, Panama
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.,Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Radiation Programme, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.,University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorenzo Brualla
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen WPE, Essen, Germany.,West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Domingo C, Lagares JI, Romero-Expósito M, Sánchez-Nieto B, Nieto-Camero JJ, Terrón JA, Irazola L, Dasu A, Sánchez-Doblado F. Peripheral Organ Equivalent Dose Estimation Procedure in Proton Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:882476. [PMID: 35692801 PMCID: PMC9176390 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this work is to present a reproducible methodology for the evaluation of total equivalent doses in organs during proton therapy facilities. The methodology is based on measuring the dose equivalent in representative locations inside an anthropomorphic phantom where photon and neutron dosimeters were inserted. The Monte Carlo simulation was needed for obtaining neutron energy distribution inside the phantom. The methodology was implemented for a head irradiation case in the passive proton beam of iThemba Labs (South Africa). Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)-600 and TLD-700 pairs were used as dosimeters inside the phantom and GEANT code for simulations. In addition, Bonner sphere spectrometry was performed inside the treatment room to obtain the neutron spectra, some relevant neutron dosimetric quantities per treatment Gy, and a percentual distribution of neutron fluence and ambient dose equivalent in four energy groups, at two locations. The neutron spectrum at one of those locations was also simulated so that a reasonable agreement between simulation and measurement allowed a validation of the simulation. Results showed that the total out-of-field dose equivalent inside the phantom ranged from 1.4 to 0.28 mSv/Gy, mainly due to the neutron contribution and with a small contribution from photons, 10% on average. The order of magnitude of the equivalent dose in organs was similar, displaying a slow reduction in values as the organ is farther from the target volume. These values were in agreement with those found by other authors in other passive beam facilities under similar irradiation and measurement conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carles Domingo
- Departament de Fisica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Juan Ignacio Lagares
- Unidad de Aplicaciones Médicas, Departamento de Tecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Jose Antonio Terrón
- Servicio de Radiofísica, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Leticia Irazola
- Servicio de Radiofísica y Protección Radiológica, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Romero-Expósito M, Toma-Dasu I, Dasu A. Determining Out-of-Field Doses and Second Cancer Risk From Proton Therapy in Young Patients—An Overview. Front Oncol 2022; 12:892078. [PMID: 35712488 PMCID: PMC9197425 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has the potential to provide survival and tumor control outcomes comparable and frequently superior to photon therapy. This has led to a significant concern in the medical physics community on the risk for the induction of second cancers in all patients and especially in younger patients, as they are considered more radiosensitive than adults and have an even longer expected lifetime after treatment. Thus, our purpose is to present an overview of the research carried out on the evaluation of out-of-field doses linked to second cancer induction and the prediction of this risk. Most investigations consisted of Monte Carlo simulations in passive beam facilities for clinical scenarios. These works established that equivalent doses in organs could be up to 200 mSv or 900 mSv for a brain or a craniospinal treatment, respectively. The major contribution to this dose comes from the secondary neutrons produced in the beam line elements. Few works focused on scanned-beam facilities, but available data show that, for these facilities, equivalent doses could be between 2 and 50 times lower. Patient age is a relevant factor in the dose level, especially for younger patients (by means of the size of the body) and, in addition, in the predicted risk by models (due to the age dependence of the radiosensitivity). For risks, the sex of the patient also plays an important role, as female patients show higher sensitivity to radiation. Thus, predicted risks of craniospinal irradiation can range from 8% for a 15-year-old male patient to 58% for a 2-year-old female patient, using a risk model from a radiological protection field. These values must be taken with caution due to uncertainties in risk models, and then dosimetric evaluation of stray radiation becomes mandatory in order to complement epidemiological studies and be able to model appropriate dose–response functions for this dose range. In this sense, analytical models represent a useful tool and some models have been implemented to be used for young patients. Research carried out so far confirmed that proton beam therapy reduces the out-of-field doses and second cancer risk. However, further investigations may be required in scanned-beam delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maite Romero-Expósito
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Maite Romero-Expósito,
| | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Oncology Pathology Department, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Majer M, Ambrožová I, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Kasabašić M, Knežević Ž, Kopeć R, Krzempek D, Krzempek K, Miljanić S, Mojżeszek N, Veršić I, Stolarczyk L, Harrison RM, Olko P. Out-of-field doses in pediatric craniospinal irradiations with 3D-CRT, VMAT and scanning proton radiotherapy - a phantom study. Med Phys 2022; 49:2672-2683. [PMID: 35090187 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) has greatly increased survival rates for patients with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. However, as it includes exposure of a large volume of healthy tissue to unwanted doses, there is a strong concern about the complications of the treatment, especially for the children. To estimate the risk of second cancers and other unwanted effects, out-of-field dose assessment is necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare out-of-field doses in pediatric CSI treatment using conventional and advanced photon radiotherapy (RT) and advanced proton therapy. To our knowledge, it is the first such comparison based on in-phantom measurements. Additionally, for out-of-field doses during photon RT in this and other studies, comparisons were made using analytical modeling. METHODS In order to describe the out-of-field doses absorbed in a pediatric patient during actual clinical treatment, an anthropomorphic phantom which mimics the 10-year-old child was used. Photon 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and two advanced, highly conformal techniques: photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and active pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiotherapy were used for CSI treatment. Radiophotoluminescent (RPL) and poly-allyl-diglycol-carbonate (PADC) nuclear track detectors were used for photon and neutron dosimetry in the phantom, respectively. Out-of-field doses from neutrons were expressed in terms of dose equivalent. A two-Gaussian model was implemented for out-of-field doses during photon RT. RESULTS The mean VMAT photon doses per target dose to all organs in this study were under 50% of the target dose (i.e., <500 mGy/Gy), while the mean 3D-CRT photon dose to oesophagus, gall bladder and thyroid, exceeded that value. However, for 3D-CRT, better sparing was achieved for eyes and lungs. The mean PBS photon doses for all organs were up to 3 orders of magnitude lower compared to VMAT and 3D-CRT and exceeded 10 mGy/Gy only for the oesophagus, intestine and lungs. The mean neutron dose equivalent during PBS for 8 organs of interest (thyroid, breasts, lungs, liver, stomach, gall bladder, bladder, prostate) ranged from 1.2 mSv/Gy for bladder to 23.1 mSv/Gy for breasts. Comparison of out-of-field doses in this and other phantom studies found in the literature showed that a simple and fast two-Gaussian model for out-of-field doses as a function of distance from the field edge can be applied in a CSI using photon RT techniques. CONCLUSIONS PBS is the most promising technique for out-of-field dose reduction in comparison to photon techniques. Among photon techniques, VMAT is a preferred choice for most of out-of-field organs and especially for the thyroid, while doses for eyes, breasts and lungs, are lower for 3D-CRT. For organs outside the field edge, a simple analytical model can be helpful for clinicians involved in treatment planning using photon RT but also for retrospective data analysis for cancer risk estimates and epidemiology in general. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Majer
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Iva Ambrožová
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | - Marie Davídková
- Nuclear Physics Institute of the CAS, Řež, CZ-250 68, Czech Republic
| | | | - Mladen Kasabašić
- Osijek University Hospital, Osijek, 31000, Croatia.,Faculty of Medicine Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, 31000, Croatia
| | | | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Dawid Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | | | - Natalia Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| | - Ivan Veršić
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
| | - Liliana Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland.,Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Roger M Harrison
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 31-342, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tillery H, Moore M, Gallagher KJ, Taddei PJ, Leuro E, Argento DC, Moffitt GB, Kranz M, Carey M, Heymsfield S, Newhauser WD. Personalized 3D-printed anthropomorphic whole-body phantom irradiated by protons, photons, and neutrons. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 35045408 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac4d04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to confirm the feasibility of three-dimensionally-printed (3D-printed), personalized whole-body anthropomorphic phantoms for radiation dose measurements in a variety of charged and uncharged particle radiation fields. We 3D-printed a personalized whole-body phantom of an adult female with a height of 154.8 cm, mass of 90.7 kg, and body mass index of 37.8 kg/m2. The phantom comprised of a hollow plastic shell filled with water and included a watertight access conduit for positioning dosimeters. It is compatible with a wide variety of radiation dosimeters, including ionization chambers that are suitable for uncharged and charged particles. Its mass was 6.8 kg empty and 98 kg when filled with water. Watertightness and mechanical robustness were confirmed after multiple experiments and transportations between institutions. The phantom was irradiated to the cranium with therapeutic beams of 170-MeV protons, 6-MV photons, and fast neutrons. Radiation absorbed dose was measured from the cranium to the pelvis along the longitudinal central axis of the phantom. The dose measurements were made using established dosimetry protocols and well-characterized instruments. For the therapeutic environments considered in this study, stray radiation from intracranial treatment beams was the lowest for proton therapy, intermediate for photon therapy, and highest for neutron therapy. An illustrative example set of measurements at the location of the thyroid for a square field of 5.3 cm per side resulted in 0.09, 0.59, and 1.93 cGy/Gy from proton, photon, and neutron beams, respectively. In this study, we found that 3D-printed personalized phantoms are feasible, inherently reproducible, and well-suited for therapeutic radiation measurements. The measurement methodologies we developed enabled the direct comparison of radiation exposures from neutron, proton, and photon beam irradiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Tillery
- Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, KPV4, Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098, UNITED STATES
| | - Meagan Moore
- Louisiana State University, 439-B Nicholson Hall, Tower Dr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803-4001, UNITED STATES
| | - Kyle Joseph Gallagher
- Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, KPV4, Portland, Oregon, 97239-3098, UNITED STATES
| | - Phillip J Taddei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, UNITED STATES
| | - Eric Leuro
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1570 N 115th St, Seattle, Washington, 98133, UNITED STATES
| | - David C Argento
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| | - Gregory B Moffitt
- Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| | - Marissa Kranz
- University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, Washington, 98195, UNITED STATES
| | - Margaret Carey
- Louisiana State University, 439-B Nicholson Hall, Tower Dr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803-4001, UNITED STATES
| | - Steven Heymsfield
- Louisiana State University, 439-B Nicholson Hall, Tower Dr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803-4001, UNITED STATES
| | - Wayne David Newhauser
- Louisiana State University, 439-B Nicholson Hall, Tower Dr., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803-4001, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
The influence of nuclear models and Monte Carlo radiation transport codes on stray neutron dose estimations in proton therapy. RADIAT MEAS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2021.106693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
12
|
Puchalska M. Modelling and measurements of distributions in an adult human phantom undergoing proton scanning beam radiotherapy: lung- and prostate-located tumours. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2021; 60:243-256. [PMID: 33651168 PMCID: PMC8116245 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-021-00895-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has been shown to offer a significant dosimetric advantage in cancer patients, in comparison to conventional radiotherapy, with a decrease in dose to healthy tissue and organs at risk, because the bulk of the beam energy is deposited in the Bragg peak to be located within a tumour. However, it should be kept in mind that radiotherapy of cancer is still accompanied by adverse side effects, and a better understanding and improvement of radiotherapy can extend the life expectancy of patients following the treatment of malignant tumours. In this study, the dose distributions measured with thermoluminescent detectors (TLDs) inside a tissue-equivalent adult human phantom exposed for lung and prostate cancer using the modern proton beam scanning radiotherapy technique were compared. Since the TLD detection efficiency depends on the ionization density of the radiation to be detected, and since this efficiency is detector specific, four different types of TLDs were used to compare their response in the mixed radiation fields. Additionally, the dose distributions from two different cancer treatment modalities were compared using the selected detectors. The measured dose values were benchmarked against Monte Carlo simulations and available literature data. The results indicate an increase in the lateral dose with an increase of the primary proton energy. However, the radiation quality factor of the mixed radiation increases by 20% in the vicinity to the target for the lower initial proton energy, due to the production of secondary charged particles of low-energy and short range. For the cases presented here the MTS-N TLD detector seems to be the most optimal tool for dose measurements within the target volume, while the MCP-N TLD detector, due to an interplay of its enhanced thermal neutron response and decreased detection efficiency to highly ionising radiation, is a better choice for the out-of-field measurements. The pairs of MTS-6 and MTS-7 TLDs used also in this study allowed for a direct measurement of the neutron dose equivalent. Before it can be concluded that they offer an alternative to the time-consuming nuclear track detectors, however, more research is needed to unambiguously confirm whether this observation was just accidental or whether it only applies to certain cases. Since there is no universal detector, which would allow the determination of the dosimetric quantities relevant for risk estimation, this work expands the knowledge necessary to improve the quality of dosimetry data and might help scientists and clinicians in choosing the right tools to measure radiation doses in mixed radiation fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Puchalska
- Radiation Physics, Technische Universität Wien, Stadionalle 2, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wochnik A, Stolarczyk L, Ambrožová I, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Domański S, Domingo C, Knežević Ž, Kopeć R, Kuć M, Majer M, Mojżeszek N, Mares V, Martínez-Rovira I, Caballero-Pacheco MÁ, Pyszka E, Swakoń J, Trinkl S, Tisi M, Harrison R, Olko P. Out-of-field doses for scanning proton radiotherapy of shallowly located paediatric tumours-a comparison of range shifter and 3D printed compensator. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035012. [PMID: 33202399 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcb1f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The lowest possible energy of proton scanning beam in cyclotron proton therapy facilities is typically between 60 and 100 MeV. Treatment of superficial lesions requires a pre-absorber to deliver doses to shallower volumes. In most of the cases a range shifter (RS) is used, but as an alternative solution, a patient-specific 3D printed proton beam compensator (BC) can be applied. A BC enables further reduction of the air gap and consequently reduction of beam scattering. Such pre-absorbers are additional sources of secondary radiation. The aim of this work was the comparison of RS and BC with respect to out-of-field doses for a simulated treatment of superficial paediatric brain tumours. EURADOS WG9 performed comparative measurements of scattered radiation in the Proteus C-235 IBA facility (Cyclotron Centre Bronowice at the Institute of Nuclear Physics, CCB IFJ PAN, Kraków, Poland) using two anthropomorphic phantoms-5 and 10 yr old-for a superficial target in the brain. Both active detectors located inside the therapy room, and passive detectors placed inside the phantoms were used. Measurements were supplemented by Monte Carlo simulation of the radiation transport. For the applied 3D printed pre-absorbers, out-of-field doses from both secondary photons and neutrons were lower than for RS. Measurements with active environmental dosimeters at five positions inside the therapy room indicated that the RS/BC ratio of the out-of-field dose was also higher than one, with a maximum of 1.7. Photon dose inside phantoms leads to higher out-of-field doses for RS than BC to almost all organs with the highest RS/BC ratio 12.5 and 13.2 for breasts for 5 and 10 yr old phantoms, respectively. For organs closest to the isocentre such as the thyroid, neutron doses were lower for BC than RS due to neutrons moderation in the target volume, but for more distant organs like bladder-conversely-lower doses for RS than BC were observed. The use of 3D printed BC as the pre-absorber placed in the near vicinity of patient in the treatment of superficial tumours does not result in the increase of secondary radiation compared to the treatment with RS, placed far from the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wochnik
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - L Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland.,Skandionkliniken, von Kraemers Allé 26, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.,Dansk Center for Partikelterapi, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - I Ambrožová
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague CZ-250 68 Řež, Czech Republic
| | - M Davídková
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague CZ-250 68 Řež, Czech Republic
| | - M De Saint-Hubert
- Belgium Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, Mol BE-2400, Belgium
| | - S Domański
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk 05-400, Poland
| | - C Domingo
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - Ž Knežević
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička c. 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - R Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - M Kuć
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk 05-400, Poland
| | - M Majer
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička c. 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - N Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - V Mares
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany
| | - I Martínez-Rovira
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - M Á Caballero-Pacheco
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - E Pyszka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - J Swakoń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - S Trinkl
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.,Technische Universität München, Physik-Department, Garching 85748, Germany
| | - M Tisi
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany
| | - R Harrison
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - P Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rühm W, Harrison RM. High CT doses return to the agenda. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2020; 59:3-7. [PMID: 31844985 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-019-00827-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- W Rühm
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Therapy, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
| | - R M Harrison
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rühm W, Ainsbury E, Breustedt B, Caresana M, Gilvin P, Knežević Ž, Rabus H, Stolarczyk L, Vargas A, Bottollier-Depois J, Harrison R, Lopez M, Stadtmann H, Tanner R, Vanhavere F, Woda C, Clairand I, Fantuzzi E, Fattibene P, Hupe O, Olko P, Olšovcová V, Schuhmacher H, Alves J, Miljanic S. The European radiation dosimetry group – Review of recent scientific achievements. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|