Long-term study of the safety and maintenance of efficacy of solriamfetol (JZP-110) in the treatment of excessive sleepiness in participants with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea

RESTORE: Once-nightly oxybate dosing preference and nocturnal experience with twice-nightly oxybates

Objective/Background

Preference for extended-release, once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB, FT218) vs twice-nightly immediate-release (IR) oxybate was assessed in participants switching from IR oxybate to ON-SXB in an open-label/switch study, RESTORE (NCT04451668).

Patients/Methods

Participants aged ≥16 years with narcolepsy who completed the phase 3 REST-ON trial, were oxybate-naive, or were on a stable IR oxybate dose (≥1 month) were eligible for RESTORE. For participants who switched from twice-nightly dosing to ON-SXB, initial doses were closest or equivalent to their previous nightly IR oxybate dose. These participants completed a questionnaire at baseline about nocturnal adverse events associated with the middle-of-the-night IR oxybate dose in the preceding 3 months, a preference questionnaire after 3 months of stable-dose ON-SXB, and an end-of-study (EOS) questionnaire.

Results

There were 130 switch participants; 92/98 (93.9 %) who completed the preference questionnaire preferred ON-SXB. At baseline, 69.2 % reported missing their second IR oxybate dose at least once; in these cases, 80 % felt worse the next day. Approximately 39 % reported taking a second nightly IR oxybate dose >4 h after the first dose, 51 % of whom felt somewhat to extremely groggy/unsteady the next morning; 120 participants (92 %) reported getting out of bed after their second oxybate dose. Of those, 9 (8 %) reported falls and 5 (4 %) reported injuries. Of the switch participants who completed the EOS questionnaire, 91.2 % felt better able to follow the recommended ON-SXB dosing schedule.

Conclusions

The second nightly IR oxybate dose presents significant treatment burdens and adherence concerns. Participants overwhelmingly preferred the once-nightly dosing regimen of ON-SXB.

Comparative efficacy, safety and benefit/risk of alerting agents for excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis

Background

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common chronic respiratory disease associated with a high burden of disabilities related to sleepiness and reduced quality of life. Despite first-line treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, many patients experience residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). The aim of this study is to compare the relative efficacy and safety of medications authorised for this indication in Europe and/or the United States (modafinil/armodafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant) for OSA.

Methods

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of authorised medications for adult patients with OSA were identified by literature searches of PubMed, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases (up to 12 June 2024). The primary efficacy endpoint was combined Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and Oxford Sleep Resistance (OSLER)/Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) Z-scores. Quality of life (QoL), overall and specific cardiovascular safety, and benefit-risk ratios were calculated. The study was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023434640.

Findings

Of 4017 studies identified, a total of 20 RCTs involving 4015 patients were included. Analysis of combined subjective (ESS) and objective (OSLER/MWT) efficacy outcome Z-scores showed that solriamfetol (150 mg; effect size [ES] = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.36, 0.96]), pitolisant (20 mg; ES = 0.66 [95% CI: 0.44, 0.88]), and modafinil (200 mg; ES = 0.54: [95% CI: 0.33, 0.74]); 400 mg; ES = 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.65]) had a clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy. P-scores ranked placebo, then pitolisant, modafinil 200 mg, modafinil 400 mg and solriamfetol for overall safety; and pitolisant, then solriamfetol, modafinil 400 mg and modafinil 200 mg for benefit-risk ratio.

Interpretation

Pitolisant, solriamfetol and modafinil had comparable efficacy for maintaining wakefulness in patients with OSA. Pitolisant had a better safety profile and benefit-risk ratio compared with solriamfetol and modafinil. The overall and cardiovascular safety risk ratios suggest that pitolisant might be the best candidate for patients with OSA with multiple cardiovascular comorbidities.

Funding

Bioprojet.

The Changed Nocturnal Sleep Structure and Higher Anxiety, Depression, and Fatigue in Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate nocturnal sleep structure and anxiety, depression, and fatigue in patients with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1).

Methods

Thirty NT1 patients and thirty-five healthy controls were enrolled and evaluated using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), polysomnography, multiple sleep latency test, and brain function state monitoring. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was performed to control the false discovery rate.

Results

Apart from typical clinical manifestations, patients with NT1 are prone to comorbidities such as nocturnal sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Compared with the control group, patients with NT1 exhibited abnormal sleep structure, including increased total sleep time (P adj=0.007), decreased sleep efficiency (P adj=0.002), shortening of sleep onset latency (P adj<0.001), elevated wake after sleep onset (P adj=0.002), increased N1% (P adj=0.006), and reduced N2%, N3%, and REM% (P adj=0.007, P adj<0.001, P adj=0.013). Thirty-seven percent of patients had moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. And sixty percent of patients were complicated with REM sleep without atonia. Patients with NT1 displayed increased anxiety propensity (P adj<0.001), and increased brain fatigue (P adj=0.020) in brain function state monitoring. FSS scores were positively correlated with brain fatigue (P adj<0.001) and mean sleep latency was inversely correlated with FSS scores and brain fatigue (P adj=0.013, P adj=0.029). Additionally, ESS scores and brain fatigue decreased after 3 months of therapy (P=0.012, P=0.030).

Conclusion

NT1 patients had abnormal nocturnal sleep structures, who showed increased anxiety, depression, and fatigue. Excessive daytime sleepiness and fatigue improved after 3 months of treatment with methylphenidate hydrochloride prolonged-release tablets in combination with venlafaxine.

Hits and misses with animal models of narcolepsy and the implications for drug discovery

INTRODUCTION

Narcolepsy is a chronic and rare neurological disorder characterized by disordered sleep. Based on animal models and further research in humans, the dysfunctional orexin system was identified as a contributing factor to the pathophysiology of narcolepsy. Animal models played a larger role in the discovery of some of the pharmacological agents with established benefit/risk profiles.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors examine the phenotypes observed in animal models of narcolepsy and the characteristics of clinically used pharmacological agents in these animal models. Additionally, the authors compare the effects of clinically used pharmacological agents on the phenotypes in animal models with those observed in narcolepsy patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Research in canine and mouse models have linked narcolepsy to the O×R2mutation and orexin deficiency, leading to new diagnostic criteria and a drug development focus. Advancements in pharmacological therapies have significantly improved narcolepsy management, with insights from both clinical experience and from animal models having led to new treatments such as low sodium oxybate and solriamfetol. However, challenges persist in addressing symptoms beyond excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy, highlighting the need for further research, including the development of diurnal animal models to enhance understanding and treatment options for narcolepsy.

Guidelines for the assessment and management of residual sleepiness in obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome: Endorsed by the French Sleep Research and Medicine Society (SFRMS) and the French Speaking Society of Respiratory Diseases (SPLF)

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is frequent among patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and can persist despite the optimal correction of respiratory events (apnea, hypopnea and respiratory efforts), using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement device. Symptoms like apathy and fatigue may be mistaken for EDS. In addition, EDS has multi-factorial origin, which makes its evaluation complex. The marketing authorization [Autorisation de Mise sur le Marché (AMM)] for two wake-promoting agents (solriamfetol and pitolisant) raises several practical issues for clinicians. This consensus paper presents recommendations of good clinical practice to identify and evaluate EDS in this context, and to manage and follow-up the patients. It was conducted under the mandate of the French Societies for sleep medicine and for pneumology [Société Française de Recherche et de Médecine du Sommeil (SFRMS) and Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française (SPLF)]. A management algorithm is suggested, as well as a list of conditions during which the patient should be referred to a sleep center or a sleep specialist. The benefit/risk balance of a wake-promoting drug in residual EDS in OSAHS patients must be regularly reevaluated, especially in elderly patients with increased cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders risks. This consensus is based on the scientific knowledge at the time of the publication and may be revised according to their evolution.

A Comprehensive Review of Solriamfetol to Treat Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

Purpose of Review

This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of Solriamfetol for excessive daytime sleepiness. It covers the background and current therapeutic approaches to treating excessive daytime sleepiness, the management of common comorbidities, and the existing evidence investigating the use of Solriamfetol for this purpose.

Recent Findings

Excessive daytime sleepiness leads to worse quality of life, a medical sequela and significant economic cost. There are multiple phenotypes of excessive daytime sleepiness depending on the comorbidity making treatment challenging. Due to the complexity of etiology there is not a cure for this ailment. Solriamfetol is a norepinephrine/dopamine dual reuptake antagonist that can be used to manage daytime sleepiness. Solriamfetol was first approved by the FDA in 2018 for use in excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy. Ongoing literature has proved this drug to be a safe and effective alternative pharmacotherapy.

Summary

Recent epidemiological data estimate up to one-third of the general adult population suffers from excessive daytime sleepiness. There is no cure to daytime somnolence and current pharmacotherapeutic regimens have worrisome side effect profiles. Solriamfetol is a new class of drug that offers a safe and effective alternative option for clinical providers treating excessive daytime sleepiness.

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) affects 13-33% of males and 6-9% of females globally and poses significant treatment challenges, including poor adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and residual excessive sleepiness (RES). This review aims to elucidate the emerging interest in pharmacological treatments for OSAS, focusing on recent advancements in this area. A thorough analysis of extensive clinical trials involving various drugs, including selective dopamine reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine inhibitors, combined antimuscarinic agents, and orexin agonists, was conducted. These trials focused on ameliorating respiratory metrics and enhancing sleep quality in individuals affected by OSAS. The studied pharmacological agents showed potential in improving primary outcomes, notably the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). These improvements suggest enhanced sleep quality and symptom management in OSAS patients. With a deeper understanding of OSAS, pharmacological interventions are emerging as a promising direction for its effective management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of drug research in OSAS, highlighting the potential of these treatments in addressing the disorder's complex challenges.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

Recommendations for clinical management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea - A Delphi consensus study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Excessive daytime sleepiness is common with obstructive sleep apnoea and can persist despite efforts to optimise primary airway therapy. The literature lacks recommendations regarding differential diagnosis and management of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. This study sought to develop expert consensus statements to bridge the gap between existing literature/guidelines and clinical practice.

METHODS

A panel of 10 international experts was convened to undertake a modified Delphi process. Statements were developed based on available evidence identified through a scoping literature review, and expert opinion. Consensus was achieved through 3 rounds of iterative, blinded survey voting and revision to statements until a predetermined level of agreement was met (≥80 % voting "strongly agree" or "agree with reservation").

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for 32 final statements. The panel agreed excessive daytime sleepiness is a patient-reported symptom. The importance of subjective/objective evaluation of excessive daytime sleepiness in the initial evaluation and serial management of obstructive sleep apnoea was recognised. The differential diagnosis of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea was discussed. Optimizing airway therapy (eg, troubleshooting issues affecting effectiveness) was addressed. The panel recognised occurrence of residual excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea despite optimal airway therapy and the need to evaluate patients for underlying causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea is a public health issue requiring increased awareness, recognition, and attention. Implementation of these statements may improve patient care, long-term management, and clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Solriamfetol: A Review in Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Solriamfetol (SUNOSI®) is an oral selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved in the EU and the USA for improving wakefulness in adults with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In phase III studies, 12 weeks' therapy with solriamfetol within the recommended dosage range for narcolepsy (75 mg or 150 mg once daily) or OSA (37.5 mg, 75 mg or 150 mg once daily) provided early and sustained reductions in excessive sleepiness and improvements in wakefulness relative to placebo. These effects were generally sustained through 52 weeks. The drug's effectiveness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy is supported by results from real-world studies. Solriamfetol demonstrated a consistent safety and tolerability profile across clinical studies, with commonly reported adverse reactions generally occurring within 2 weeks of treatment initiation and mostly resolving within 2 weeks. Thus, solriamfetol represents a useful treatment option for adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA.

False positive urine amphetamine immunoassay due to solriamfetol

Solriamfetol is a schedule IV-controlled substance used to treat excessive daytime sleepiness resulting from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. We present a patient prescribed solriamfetol who tested positive for amphetamines on a routine urinary toxicology screen despite patient denial of illicit drug use, raising the possibility of a false positive amphetamine screen. Spiking studies were performed on negative urine, and different concentrations of solriamfetol drug on 2 different amphetamine assays: the commonly used Beckman Emit® II Plus Amphetamines Assay, and the Citrine™ Triple Quad™ MS/MS Systems. The Beckman yielded positive results for amphetamines at solriamfetol concentrations of 200 μg/mL and 2000 μg/mL and negative results at 0.2 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL. However, the Citrine™ Triple Quad™ MS/MS Systems was negative at all concentrations. The Beckman Emit® II Plus Amphetamine Assay gave false positive results for amphetamines due to solriamfetol drug usage, a finding of relevance to prescribers of solriamfetol.

Solriamfetol enhances wakefulness and improves cognition and anxiety in a murine model of OSA

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition characterized by intermittent hypoxia (IH). Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a common consequence of OSA and is associated with cognitive deficits and anxiety. Modafinil (MOD) and Solriamfetol (SOL) are potent wake-promoting agents clinically used to improve wakefulness in OSA patients with EDS.

METHODS

Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to either IH or room air (RA) controls during the light phase for 16 weeks. Both groups were then randomly assigned to receive once-daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL (200 mg/kg), MOD (200 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH) for 9 days while continuing IH exposures. Sleep/wake activity was assessed during the dark (active) phase. Novel object recognition (NOR), elevated-plus maze test (EPMT), and forced swim test (FST) were performed before and after drug treatment.

RESULTS

IH exposure increased dark phase sleep percentage and reduced wake bouts lengths and induced cognitive deficits and anxiogenic effects. Both SOL and MOD treatments decreased sleep propensity under IH conditions, but only SOL promoted improvements in NOR performance (explicit memory) and reduced anxiety-like behaviors.

CONCLUSION

Chronic IH, a hallmark feature of OSA, induces EDS in young adult mice that is ameliorated by both SOL and MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves IH-induced cognitive deficits and promotes anxiolytic effects. Thus, SOL could potentially benefit OSA patients beyond EDS management.

Solriamfetol improves chronic sleep fragmentation-induced increases in sleep propensity and ameliorates explicit memory in male mice

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition characterized by episodes of partial or complete breath cessation during sleep that induces sleep fragmentation (SF). One of the frequent manifestations of OSA is the presence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with cognitive deficits. Solriamfetol (SOL) and modafinil (MOD) are wake-promoting agents commonly prescribed to improve wakefulness in OSA patients with EDS. This study aimed to assess the effects of SOL and MOD in a murine model of OSA characterized by periodic SF. Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to either control sleep (SC) or SF (mimicking OSA) during the light period (06:00 h to 18:00 h) for 4 weeks, which consistently induces sustained excessive sleepiness during the dark phase. Both groups were then randomly assigned to receive once-daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL (200 mg/kg), MOD (200 mg/kg), or vehicle for 1 week while continuing exposures to SF or SC. Sleep/wake activity and sleep propensity were assessed during the dark phase. Novel Object Recognition test, Elevated-Plus Maze Test, and Forced Swim Test were performed before and after treatment. SOL or MOD decreased sleep propensity in SF, but only SOL induced improvements in explicit memory, while MOD exhibited increased anxiety behaviors. Chronic SF, a major hallmark of OSA, induces EDS in young adult mice that is mitigated by both SOL and MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves SF-induced cognitive deficits. Increased anxiety behaviors are apparent in MOD-treated mice. Further studies aiming to elucidate the beneficial cognitive effects of SOL are warranted.

Is obstructive sleep apnea a circadian rhythm disorder?

Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep-related breathing disorder worldwide and remains underdiagnosed. Its multiple associated comorbidities contribute to a decreased quality of life and work performance as well as an increased risk of death. Standard treatment seems to have limited effects on cardiovascular and metabolic aspects of the disease, emphasising the need for early diagnosis and additional therapeutic approaches. Recent evidence suggests that the dysregulation of circadian rhythms, processes with endogenous rhythmicity that are adjusted to the environment through various cues, is involved in the pathogenesis of comorbidities. In patients with obstructive sleep apnea, altered circadian gene expression patterns have been demonstrated. Obstructive respiratory events may promote circadian dysregulation through the effects of sleep disturbance and intermittent hypoxia, with subsequent inflammation and disruption of neural and hormonal homeostasis. In this review, current knowledge on obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm regulation, and circadian rhythm sleep disorders is summarised. Studies that connect obstructive sleep apnea to circadian rhythm abnormalities are critically evaluated. Furthermore, pathogenetic mechanisms that may underlie this association, most notably hypoxia signalling, are presented. A bidirectional relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and circadian rhythm dysregulation is proposed. Approaching obstructive sleep apnea as a circadian rhythm disorder may prove beneficial for the development of new, personalised diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic tools. However, further studies are needed before the clinical approach to obstructive sleep apnea includes targeting the circadian system.

Solriamfetol real world experience study (SURWEY): Initiation, titration, safety, effectiveness, and experience during follow-up for patients with narcolepsy from Germany

BACKGROUND

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a core narcolepsy symptom, for which solriamfetol (Sunosi®) was recently approved in the European Union. SURWEY characterises real-world strategies used by physicians when initiating solriamfetol, and patient outcomes after follow-up.

METHODS

SURWEY is an ongoing retrospective chart review conducted by physicians in Germany/France/Italy. Here, data are reported from 70 German patients with EDS and narcolepsy. Eligibility included age ≥18 years, reached a stable solriamfetol dose, and completed ≥6 weeks of treatment. Patients were classified (based on existing EDS treatment) into changeover, add-on, or new-to-therapy subgroups.

RESULTS

Patients' mean ± SD age was 36.9 ± 13.9 years. Changeover from prior EDS medication was the most common initiation strategy. Initial solriamfetol dose was typically 75 mg/day (69%). In 30 patients (43%), solriamfetol was titrated; 27/30 (90%) completed titration as prescribed, most within 7 days. Mean ± SD Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was 17.6 ± 3.1 at initiation (n = 61) and 13.6 ± 3.8 at follow-up (n = 51). Slight/strong improvements in EDS were perceived for >90% of patients (patient and physician report). Sixty-two percent reported an effect duration of 6 to <10 h; 72% reported no change in perceived nighttime sleep quality. Common adverse events included headache (9%), decreased appetite (6%), and insomnia (6%); no cardiovascular events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients in this study were switched from a prior EDS medication to solriamfetol. Solriamfetol was typically initiated at 75 mg/day; titration was common. ESS scores improved after initiation, and most patients perceived improvement in EDS. Common adverse events were consistent with those reported in clinical trials.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV REGISTRATION

N/A.

Psychomotor Vigilance Performance in Participants with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Obstructive Sleep Apnea or Narcolepsy Compared with SAFTE-FAST Model Predictions

INTRODUCTION

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can impair vigilance/attention. Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved to treat EDS associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or OSA (37.5-150 mg/day). The analysis reported here explored the use of the Sleep, Activity, Fatigue, and Task Effectiveness (SAFTE) model (used in transport industries to model performance based on accumulated sleep and circadian variability) as a substitute for healthy controls using psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) data collected during clinical studies.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from two phase 2 studies of solriamfetol in adults with OSA (NCT02806895, EudraCT 2015-003930-28) or narcolepsy (NCT02806908, EudraCT 2015-003931-36). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to solriamfetol 150 mg/day (3 days) followed by 300 mg/day (4 days), or placebo (7 days), then crossed over to the other treatment. Actual task effectiveness scores were calculated from average PVT inverse reaction time (pre-dose; 2 h post-dose; 6 h post-dose). Actigraphy-derived sleep intervals were used in SAFTE to determine modeled healthy control task effectiveness scores.

RESULTS

In participants with OSA (N = 31) on placebo or solriamfetol, actual and modeled healthy control task effectiveness did not differ at any time point. In participants with narcolepsy (N = 20) on placebo, actual task effectiveness at 2 h post-dose was lower than modeled healthy control task effectiveness (nominal P = 0.03), a difference not present with solriamfetol. There was no main effect of solriamfetol on actual or modeled healthy control task effectiveness across time points.

CONCLUSION

This study represents a novel application of the SAFTE biomathematical model to approximate healthy controls in sleep disorder research and provides valuable lessons that may optimize future research. Future studies should perform a priori power analyses for model-tested outcomes and use sleep measures that capture sleep fragmentation characteristic of sleep disorders for sleep input (e.g., total sleep time rather than time in bed).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02806895, EudraCT 2015-003930-28: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover On-Road Driving Study Assessing the Effect of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in Subjects With Excessive Sleepiness Due to Obstructive Sleep Apnea. NCT02806908, EudraCT 2015-003931-36: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover On-Road Driving Study Assessing the Effect of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in Subjects With Excessive Sleepiness Due to Narcolepsy.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Wake-Promoting Agents for the Treatment of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Narcolepsy is a rare debilitating disorder for which multiple novel pharmacological options have been approved as treatment for the past few years. The current study systematically updates the comparative efficacy and detailed safety analysis of approved wake-promoting agents in narcolepsy.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched for diagnosed narcolepsy with approved interventions. Efficacy outcomes included the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C). Safety outcomes including overall adverse event (AE) risk were measured. The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD 42022334915).

Results

The final analysis included 17 RCTs with five drug treatments: modafinil/armodafinil, sodium oxybate, pitolisant, solriamfetol, and lower-sodium oxybate (LXB). For efficacy measures, interventions included in each outcome were effective compared with placebo. Furthermore, the magnitude of solriamfetol effect on MWT (9.11 minutes; 95% CI=7.05-11.16), ESS (-4.79; 95% CI=-6.56 to -3.01), and PGI-C (9.39; 95% CI= 2.37-37.19), and LXB effect on CGI-C (9.67; 95% CI=2.73-34.26) was greater than that of other treatments included in each outcome compared with placebo. For safety measures, all interventions had an acceptable safety profile with LXB having least risk for overall AEs (0.56; 95% CI=0.20-1.53), serious AEs (0.33; 95% CI=0.09-1.20), AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (0.11; 95% CI=0.01-2.04), and all-cause discontinuation (0.04; 95% CI=0.00-0.67) compared to placebo. Placebo had the lowest risk for exploratory AEs.

Conclusion

All approved interventions were effective in controlling the symptoms of narcolepsy at varying degrees with an acceptable safety profile.

Effects of solriamfetol on on-the-road driving in participants with narcolepsy: A randomised crossover trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on on-the-road driving performance in participants with narcolepsy.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, driving performance during a 1 h on-road driving test was assessed at 2 and 6 h post-dose following 7 days of treatment with solriamfetol (150 mg/day for 3 days, followed by 300 mg/day for 4 days) or placebo. The primary endpoint was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) at 2 h post-dose.

RESULTS

The study included 24 participants (54% male; mean age, 40 years); 22 had evaluable SDLP data. At 2 h post-dose, median SDLP was significantly lower (improved) with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.08 vs. 20.46 cm [median difference, -1.9 cm], p = 0.002). Four participants on solriamfetol and 7 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. At 6 h post-dose, median SDLP was not statistically significantly different with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.59 vs. 19.78 cm [median difference, -1.1 cm], p = 0.125). Three participants on solriamfetol and 10 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. Common adverse events (≥5%) included headache, decreased appetite, and somnolence.

CONCLUSIONS

Solriamfetol 300 mg/day improved on-the-road driving performance, at 2 h post-administration in participants with narcolepsy.

Effects of solriamfetol treatment on body weight in participants with obstructive sleep apnea or narcolepsy

OBJECTIVES

This analysis characterized changes in weight in participants with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or narcolepsy treated with solriamfetol (Sunosi™) 37.5 (OSA only), 75, 150, or 300 mg/d.

METHODS

In two 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and one 1-year open-label extension study, changes in weight were evaluated from baseline to end of study (week 12 or week 40 of the open-label extension [after up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment]) in participants with OSA or narcolepsy.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, median percent change in weight from baseline across all solriamfetol doses was -0.84%, compared with 0.54% for placebo, in participants with OSA; and -0.07%, compared with 3.08% for placebo, in participants with narcolepsy. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, overall median percent change in weight from baseline was -1.76%, which showed a dose-dependent pattern (75 mg, 0.57%; 150 mg, -1.2%; 300 mg, -2.5%). Results were similar in subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with overall median percent changes in weight of -2.2% and -1.1%, respectively. After up to 52 weeks of solriamfetol treatment, the percentage of participants with weight loss ≥5% relative to baseline was 25.7% overall and increased in a dose-dependent manner (75 mg, 4.5%; 150 mg, 17.3%; 300 mg, 32.4%). Results were similar among subgroups of participants with OSA or narcolepsy, with 26.4% and 24.2% of participants experiencing weight loss ≥5%, respectively. No weight-related treatment-emergent adverse events were serious.

CONCLUSIONS

Solriamfetol treatment was associated with decreases in body weight in a dose-related manner.

Effects of solriamfetol on on-the-road driving performance in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnoea

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on on-the-road driving in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

METHODS

Eligible participants were aged 21-75 years with OSA and EDS (Maintenance of Wakefulness Test mean sleep latency <30 minutes and Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≥10). Participants were randomised 1:1 to solriamfetol (150 mg/day [3 days], then 300 mg/day [4 days]) or placebo for 7 days, before crossover to the other treatment paradigm. On Day 7 of each period, standardised on-road driving tests occurred (2 and 6 hours postdose). Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Solriamfetol significantly reduced SDLP at 2 (n = 34; least squares mean difference, -1.1 cm; 95% CI, -1.85, -0.32; p = 0.006) and 6 hours postdose (n = 32; least squares mean difference, -0.8 cm; 95% CI, -1.58, -0.03; p = 0.043). Two hours postdose, 4 placebo-treated and 1 solriamfetol-treated participants had incomplete driving tests; 6 hours postdose, 7 and 3 participants, respectively, had incomplete tests. Common treatment-emergent adverse events included headache, nausea, and insomnia.

CONCLUSIONS

Solriamfetol 300 mg/day significantly improved on-the-road driving performance in participants with EDS associated with OSA.

Pharmacological Interventions for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Adults with Narcolepsy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Narcolepsy is a neurological disease characterized by a core symptom of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Although effective pharmacological interventions for narcolepsy have been developed, a lack of comparative evidence supporting the relative efficacy among these medications leads to clinical treatment challenge. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to overcome this lack of head-to-head comparisons. Databases were searched systematically for randomized controlled trials that compared pharmacological interventions for narcolepsy. The primary outcomes were changes in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). A random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted. A total of 19 RCTs involving 2504 patients were included. Solriamfetol achieved the highest ranking based on the P-scores, and was superior to pitolisant (MD −2.88, 95% CI −4.89–−0.88) and sodium oxybate (MD −2.56, 95% CI −4.62–−0.51) for ESS change. Consistently, solriamfetol achieved the highest ranking according to MWT change, and was superior to pitolisant (SMD 0.45, 95% CI 0.02–0.88) and modafinil (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.05–0.79). Although solriamfetol demonstrated superior efficacy in EDS improvement, evidence from the clustered ranking plot supported that efficacy–safety profiles of pitolisant, sodium oxybate, and modafinil are more balanced than solriamfetol. Therefore, the choice of medication for EDS in narcolepsy should be made on an individual basis.

Solriamfetol Titration & AdministRaTion (START) in Patients With Narcolepsy

PURPOSE

Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (in the United States and European Union) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/d) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150 mg/d). This study characterized real-world titration strategies for patients with narcolepsy (with or without comorbid OSA) initiating solriamfetol therapy.

METHODS

This virtual, descriptive study included a retrospective medical record review and qualitative survey. US-based physicians prescribing solriamfetol for EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA participated. Data are reported for patients with narcolepsy with or without comorbid OSA (OSA alone reported separately). On the basis of medical record review, titration strategies were classified de novo (EDS medication naive), transition (switched or switching from existing EDS medication[s] to solriamfetol), or add-on (adding solriamfetol to current EDS medication[s]). The survey included open-ended questions regarding a hypothetical patient-a 32-year-old woman with narcolepsy (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 8) treated with 35 mg/d of amphetamine and 6 g per night of sodium oxybate who experiences non-use-limiting adverse events from amphetamine.

FINDINGS

Twenty-six physicians participated: 23 provided data from 70 patients with narcolepsy (type 1, n = 24; type 2, n = 46; mean [SD] age, 40 [11] years; 57% female; 6 with comorbid OSA), and 26 responded to the hypothetical patient scenario. From the medical record review, solriamfetol therapy initiation was de novo for 19 of 70 patients (27%), transition for 31 of 70 patients (44%), and add-on for 20 of 70 patients (29%). Efficacy profile of solriamfetol was the primary reason for de novo (12 of 19 [63%]), transition (18 of 31 [58%]), and add-on (19 of 20 [95%]) initiation. Most (86%) initiated use of solriamfetol at 75 mg/d and were stable at 150 mg/d (76%). Most (67%) had 1 dose adjustment, reaching a stable dose over a median (range) of 14 (1-60) days. Physicians most often considered EDS severity (44%) when titrating. Among transitioning patients, 14 of 22 (64%) using wake-promoting agents discontinued their use abruptly, and 5 of 9 (56%) using stimulants were tapered off. At data collection, 90% continued to take solriamfetol. Regarding the hypothetical patient scenario, most physicians (81%) thought solriamfetol was appropriate, highlighting tolerability issues with current treatment and lack of symptom control as drivers for switching; however, 3 physicians (12%) did not think solriamfetol was appropriate, noting current symptoms were not severe enough and/or symptoms could be managed by increasing sodium oxybate dose; 2 (8%) thought it would depend on other factors. Physicians emphasized managing withdrawal symptoms while maintaining EDS symptom control when titrating off a stimulant and starting solriamfetol therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

In a real-world study, physicians initiated solriamfetol therapy at 75 mg/d for most patients with narcolepsy, adjusted dosages once, tapered stimulants, and abruptly discontinued therapy with wake-promoting agents. (Clin Ther. 2022;XX:XXX-XXX) © 2022 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Turning Over a New Leaf-Pharmacologic Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Despite extensive research, there is currently no approved drug for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. OSA is a heterogeneous condition that involves multiple dominating pathophysiological traits. Drug development in this field needs to address both pathophysiological mechanisms and associated comorbid conditions in order to meet requirements for long-term therapy in OSA. Several drug candidates have been proposed and ongoing phase II trials that target various forms of sleep-disordered breathing have been initiated. The field is moving toward tailored therapeutic approaches in patients with OSA.

Solriamfetol Titration and AdministRaTion (START) in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Retrospective Chart Review and Hypothetical Patient Scenario

Introduction

Solriamfetol (Sunosi™), a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (USA and EU) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5–150 mg/day). Real-world research on solriamfetol initiation is limited. The objective of this study was to describe dosing and titration strategies used when initiating solriamfetol and to assess whether and how patient factors affected these strategies.

Methods

This descriptive study, featuring a quantitative retrospective patient chart review and hypothetical patient scenario, enrolled US-based physicians prescribing solriamfetol for EDS associated with OSA and/or narcolepsy. Initiation of solriamfetol was classified as: (1) de novo (EDS medication-naive); (2) transition (switched/switching from existing EDS medication[s] to solriamfetol), or (3) add-on (adding solriamfetol to current EDS medication[s]). Study fielding occurred 3–19 June 2020. Data were summarized descriptively.

Results

Twenty-six physicians participated in the study, of whom 24 provided data from 50 patients with OSA (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 51.9 ± 9.1 years; 62% male). Mean apnea–hypopnea index at diagnosis indicated that most patients had severe OSA and 92% were adherent to positive airway pressure therapy. EDS was primarily moderate (56%) or severe (36%). Solriamfetol initiation was de novo for 44% of patients, transition for 52%, and add-on for 4%. Efficacy (including the need for better efficacy) was the primary reason for the initiation of solriamfetol as de novo (82%), transition (58%), and add-on (100%) therapy. Starting doses were predominantly 37.5 mg/day (48%) or 75 mg/day (48%); stable doses were typically 75 mg/day (56%) or 150 mg/day (40%). Most patients (64%) adjusted dosages once, reaching stable doses over a median (range) of 14 (1–74) days. Physicians considered EDS severity (32% of patients) when titrating, but more commonly no specific patient factors caused them to alter their titration (44% of patients). Physicians abruptly discontinued wake-promoting agents (WPAs; 17/18, 94%) and stimulants (6/9, 67%) for transitioning patients. The hypothetical patient scenario showed that physicians discontinuing prior WPAs commonly considered the current dose (23%) and potential adverse events (15%). Most patients (96%) were stable on solriamfetol at data collection.

Conclusions

In a real-world study, most physicians initiated solriamfetol at 37.5 or 75 mg/day and titrated to 75 or 150 mg/day for patients with EDS associated with OSA, adjusted dosages once, and abruptly discontinued prior WPAs. At data collection, most patients remained on solriamfetol.

Graphical abstract

Konsensus-Statement der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Schlafmedizin (ÖGSM/ASRA) zum Management der residualen exzessiven Tagesschläfrigkeit (rETS) bei obstruktiver Schlafapnoe

Hintergrund

Sechs bis zehn Prozent aller Patienten mit einer obstruktiven Schlafapnoe leiden trotz adäquater nächtlicher Überdrucktherapie oder einer effektiven Alternativtherapie an einer residualen exzessiven Tagesschläfrigkeit (rETS). Die Differentialdiagnose der rETS stellt im klinischen Alltag eine interdisziplinäre Herausforderung dar.

Fragestellung

Entwicklung eines übersichtlichen Leitfadens für die Erkennung, die differentialdiagnostischen Abwägungen und die Möglichkeiten der weiterführenden Behandlung der rETS in der klinischen Praxis.

Material und Methode

MeSH-Analyse basierte Recherche und interdisziplinäre Abstimmung von Fachvertreter:innen der Inneren Medizin und Pneumologie, Neurologie sowie Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

Ergebnisse

SPAIN-Checkliste zur systematischen differentialdiagnostischen Exploration der rETS mit den Parametern: S chlafverhalten, P sychische Ursachen, A namnese der Medikation, I nternistische Ursachen und N eurologische Ursachen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die rETS sollte als behandlungswürdiges Symptom erkannt werden. Sie verlangt nach einer interdisziplinären Abklärung und der individuellen Abstimmung der Behandlung auf die Bedürfnisse der Betroffenen.

Investigation and management of residual sleepiness in CPAP-treated patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: the European view

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a major symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), defined as the inability to stay awake during the day. Its clinical descriptors remain elusive, and the pathogenesis is complex, with disorders such as insufficient sleep and depression commonly associated. Subjective EDS can be evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, in which the patient reports the probability of dozing in certain situations; however, its reliability has been challenged. Objective tests such as the multiple sleep latency test or the maintenance of wakefulness test are not commonly used in patients with OSA, since they require nocturnal polysomnography, daytime testing and are expensive. Drugs for EDS are available in the United States but were discontinued in Europe some time ago. For European respiratory physicians, treatment of EDS with medication is new and they may lack experience in pharmacological treatment of EDS, while novel wake-promoting drugs have been recently developed and approved for clinical use in OSA patients in the USA and Europe. This review will discuss 1) the potential prognostic significance of EDS in OSA patients at diagnosis, 2) the prevalence and predictors of residual EDS in treated OSA patients, and 3) the evolution of therapy for EDS specifically for Europe.

Solriamfetol for the Use of Narcolepsy: A Systematic Review

Narcolepsy is a chronic and disabling neurological disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and cataplexy. Historically, some medications have demonstrated efficacy in managing EDS and cataplexy symptoms. However, some patients cannot tolerate them, become refractory, or may use concomitant medications that preclude the use due to drug-drug interaction. Therefore, there is a necessity to explore the efficacy of new treatments, such as solriamfetol (JZP-110), a 2019 FDA-approved drug indicated to improve wakefulness in adults with EDS associated with narcolepsy. We conducted this systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of solriamfetol in EDS and cataplexy, and the drug's overall safety. For this study, we used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and MOOSE protocol. After an initial search of 119 papers, we included four clinical trials to investigate and analyze the use of solriamfetol for the treatment of narcolepsy. Solriamfetol was proven to improve objective measures of EDS in all clinical trials. We conducted this systematic review using objective measures such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test. Overall, cataplexy was not formally evaluated in the four clinical trials; however, it demonstrated that EDS improved in patients with and without cataplexy. More clinical trials are needed to analyze the efficacy of solriamfetol on cataplexy. The effect of solriamfetol in EDS seems to be conclusive.

Pharmacotherapy of residual excessive sleepiness among continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treated patients with sleep apnea

INTRODUCTION

Patients with persistent sleepiness after adequate treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) experience impaired cognition, reduced productivity, and worse quality of life. Although the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon are not completely understood, neuroimaging studies have identified reduced gray matter in the frontal cortex and alterations in white matter integrity suggestive of axonal and myelin damage. The intermittent hypoxia with resulting oxidative injury is considered a prime culprit behind the loss of wake-promoting catecholaminergic neurons.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review gives an overview of the pathophysiology and approaches to managing patients with residual sleepiness. The authors explore different targeted strategies aimed at improving selection of appropriate pharmacotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Wake-stimulant medications (modafinil and armodafinil) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing sleepiness in adequately treated OSA. The recent FDA approval of pitolisant and solriamfetol complements the use of modafinil by substituting for direct sympathomimetic agents. The distinctive pharmacologic profile and mode of action of each of these agents offer the opportunity of a personalized approach to the management of this disorder. Further studies should be conducted on the long-term effect of these agents alone or in combination on brain structural and functional changes.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a lifelong disorder that adversely affects daytime function and quality of life. Major symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness with irrepressible sleep attacks and cataplexy. Recent developments in the understanding of the pathobiology of narcolepsy, as well as the neuronal systems involved in the regulation of wakefulness have led to development of new pharmacologic approaches to therapy. In this paper, we review available pharmacologic treatments for narcolepsy as well as agents currently under investigation.

Incidence and duration of common early-onset adverse events in randomized controlled trials of solriamfetol for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This post hoc analysis characterized the weekly incidence and overall duration of common early-onset, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during solriamfetol treatment.

METHODS

Participants (obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], n = 474; narcolepsy, n = 236) were randomized to 12 weeks of placebo or solriamfetol 37.5 (OSA only), 75, 150, or 300 mg. For common early-onset TEAEs (those occurring in ≥ 5% of participants in any solriamfetol dose group and with a higher incidence than that observed in placebo-treated participants during week 1), the incidence of new occurrence or change in severity over time was calculated for each subsequent study week. Data were analyzed separately for each study and summarized by placebo and combined solriamfetol groups.

RESULTS

Common early-onset TEAEs (at doses ≤ 150 mg; ie, approved doses) included headache (OSA, 5.1%; narcolepsy, 8.5%), nausea (OSA, 2.5%; narcolepsy, 4.2%), decreased appetite (OSA, 4.2%; narcolepsy, 5.9%), as well as anxiety (2.1%), insomnia (1.3%), and feeling jittery (3.0%) in OSA and dry mouth (4.2%) in narcolepsy. Incidence of common early-onset TEAEs was highest at week 1 and decreased over time. In OSA at doses ≤ 150 mg, headache, nausea, and feeling jittery had median durations ≤ 8 days, whereas decreased appetite, anxiety, and insomnia had longer durations. In narcolepsy at doses ≤ 150 mg, headache and nausea had median durations ≤ 8 days, whereas decreased appetite and dry mouth had longer durations. Most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Common early-onset TEAEs with solriamfetol are limited in duration, with the majority subsiding during the first week of treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Narcolepsy; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348593; Identifier: NCT02348593; and Name: Twelve-week Study of the Safety and Efficacy of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348606; Identifier: NCT02348606.

CITATION

Rosenberg R, Thorpy MJ, Dauvilliers Y, et al. Incidence and duration of common early-onset adverse events in randomized controlled trials of solriamfetol for treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea and narcolepsy. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):235-244.

Novel avenues to approach non-CPAP therapy and implement comprehensive OSA care

Recent advances in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) pathophysiology and translational research have opened new lines of investigation for OSA treatment and management. Key goals of such investigations are to provide efficacious, alternative treatment and management pathways that are better tailored to individual risk profiles to move beyond the traditional, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-focused, "one size fits all", trial and error approach which is too frequently inadequate for many patients. Identification of different clinical manifestations of OSA (clinical phenotypes) and underlying pathophysiological phenotypes (endotypes), that contribute to OSA have provided novel insights into underlying mechanisms and have underpinned these efforts. Indeed, this new knowledge has provided the framework for precision medicine for OSA to improve treatment success rates with existing non-CPAP therapies such as mandibular advancement devices and upper airway surgery, and newly developed therapies such as hypoglossal nerve stimulation and emerging therapies such as pharmacotherapies and combination therapy. These concepts have also provided insight into potential physiological barriers to CPAP adherence for certain patients. This review summarises the recent advances in OSA pathogenesis, non-CPAP treatment, clinical management approaches and highlights knowledge gaps for future research. OSA endotyping and clinical phenotyping, risk stratification and personalised treatment allocation approaches are rapidly evolving and will further benefit from the support of recent advances in e-health and artificial intelligence.

Current Management of Residual Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Due to Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes

Although excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) attributable to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can be resolved by consistent usage of and effective treatment (often with the use of continuous positive airway pressure therapy), 12–58% of patients report residual EDS (REDS). While REDS is difficult to treat, a proportion of cases are possibly due to reversible issues, and wake-promoting medications can prove useful for the remaining cases. Given the challenges associated with effective management of REDS and its relationship to multiple comorbidities, multidisciplinary management of patients with REDS is often recommended. Here we aim to bridge the knowledge gap on the burden, risk factors, prevalence, and potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of REDS in patients with OSA after first-line treatment. The roles of primary care physicians and sleep specialists, as well as the importance of the use of objective assessment tools for the evaluation of REDS and the effective management of comorbidities, are discussed. An update of approved treatments and emerging candidate treatments is also presented.

Long-term effects of solriamfetol on quality of life and work productivity in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the United States and European Union for excessive daytime sleepiness in adults with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; 37.5-150 mg/day). In 12-week studies, solriamfetol was associated with improvements in quality of life in participants with narcolepsy or OSA. These analyses evaluated the long-term effects of solriamfetol on quality of life.

METHODS

Participants with narcolepsy or OSA who completed previous solriamfetol studies were eligible. A 2-week titration was followed by a maintenance phase ≤ 50 weeks (stable doses: 75, 150, or 300 mg/day). Quality of life assessments included Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short version, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2. Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline to end of study were evaluated. Data were summarized descriptively. Adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Safety population comprised 643 participants (417 OSA, 226 narcolepsy). Solriamfetol improved Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire short version Total scores (mean change [standard deviation], 3.7 [3.0]) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 Physical and Mental Component Summary scores (3.1 [6.9] and 4.3 [8.4], respectively); improvements were sustained throughout treatment. On Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem, solriamfetol reduced (improved) % presenteeism, % overall work impairment, and % activity impairment by a minimum of 25%. Common adverse events (≥ 5%): headache, nausea, nasopharyngitis, insomnia, dry mouth, anxiety, decreased appetite, and upper respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term solriamfetol treatment was associated with clinically meaningful, sustained improvements in functional status, work productivity, and quality of life for up to 52 weeks. Adverse events were similar between narcolepsy and OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Long-Term Safety Study of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Subjects with Narcolepsy or OSA; Identifier: NCT02348632; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348632.

CITATION

Weaver TE, Pepin J-L, Schwab R, et al. Long-term effects of solriamfetol on quality of life and work productivity in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(10):1995-2007.

Test-retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in clinical trial settings

The present analysis examined the test–retest reliability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea in three clinical trials. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates for Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores from two solriamfetol 12‐week placebo‐controlled trials (one narcolepsy, one obstructive sleep apnea) and one long‐term open‐label extension trial (narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea) were calculated using postbaseline time‐point pairs for the overall population in each trial, by treatment, and by primary obstructive sleep apnea therapy adherence. In the 12‐week narcolepsy trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.83 (0.79, 0.87) for weeks 4 and 8 (n = 199), 0.87 (0.83, 0.90) for weeks 8 and 12 (n = 196), and 0.81 (0.76, 0.85) for weeks 4 and 12 (n = 196). In the 12‐week obstructive sleep apnea trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) (n = 416), 0.80 (0.76, 0.83) (n = 405), and 0.74 (0.69, 0.78) (n = 405), respectively. In the open‐label extension trial, intraclass correlation coefficients (95% confidence intervals) were 0.82 (0.79, 0.85) for weeks 14 and 26/27 (n = 495), 0.85 (0.82, 0.87) for weeks 26/27 and 39/40 (n = 463), and 0.78 (0.74, 0.81) for weeks 14 and 39/40 (n = 463). Placebo/solriamfetol treatment or adherence to primary obstructive sleep apnea therapy did not affect reliability. In conclusion, across three large clinical trials of participants with narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores demonstrated a robust acceptable level of test–retest reliability in evaluating treatment response over time.

Residual excessive daytime sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea: guidance for assessment, diagnosis, and management

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) affects approximately half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and can persist in some despite normalization of breathing, oxygenation, and sleep quality with primary OSA therapy, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). EDS is often overlooked and under discussed in the primary care setting and in the follow-up of CPAP-treated patients due to difficult assessment of such a multi-dimensional symptom. This review aims to provide suggestions for procedures that can be implemented into routine clinical practice to identify, evaluate, and manage EDS in patients treated for OSA, including how to appropriately use various self-report and objective assessments along the clinical pathway and options for pharmacotherapy. In addition, examples of when it is appropriate to refer a patient to a sleep specialist for evaluation are discussed.

Effects of solriamfetol in a long-term trial of participants with obstructive sleep apnea who are adherent or nonadherent to airway therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved in the United States and European Union to treat excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150 mg/day) and narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day). This analysis evaluated solriamfetol's efficacy in subgroups of participants with OSA who were adherent or nonadherent to primary OSA therapy at baseline and examined whether solriamfetol affected the use of primary therapy in an open-label extension trial.

METHODS

Participants with OSA who completed prior solriamfetol studies received solriamfetol 75, 150, or 300 mg/day for ≤ 52 weeks. The main efficacy outcome was the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score. Primary therapy use was summarized as the percentage of nights, the number of hours/night, and the percentage of nights with use ≥ 50%/night (%). Efficacy and primary therapy use are reported for participants who directly enrolled from a previous 12-week study and had ≤ 40 weeks of open-label treatment (n = 333). Safety data are reported for all participants (n = 417).

RESULTS

Mean ESS scores in adherent (n = 255) and nonadherent (n = 78) subgroups, respectively, were 15.0 and 15.8 at baseline (of 12-week study) and 6.5 and 6.8 at week 40. For participants using an airway therapy, mean use at baseline was 90% of nights, 6.6 hours/night, and use ≥ 50%/night on 90% of nights; changes from baseline to week 40 were minimal (0.9%, -0.8 hours, and 6.5%, respectively). Common adverse events (both subgroups) included headache, nasopharyngitis, insomnia, dry mouth, nausea, anxiety, and upper respiratory tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term efficacy and safety of solriamfetol were similar regardless of adherence to primary OSA therapy. Solriamfetol did not affect primary therapy use.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: A Long-Term Safety Study of JZP-110 in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in Subjects with Narcolepsy or OSA; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02348632; Identifier: NCT02348632 and Registry: EU Clinical Trials Register; Identifier: 2014-005489-31; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2014-005489-31..

European guideline and expert statements on the management of narcolepsy in adults and children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Narcolepsy is an uncommon hypothalamic disorder of presumed autoimmune origin that usually requires lifelong treatment. This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of narcolepsy in both adults and children.

METHODS

The European Academy of Neurology (EAN), European Sleep Research Society (ESRS), and European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) nominated a task force of 18 narcolepsy specialists. According to the EAN recommendations, 10 relevant clinical questions were formulated in PICO format. Following a systematic review of the literature (performed in Fall 2018 and updated in July 2020) recommendations were developed according to the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 10,247 references were evaluated, 308 studies were assessed and 155 finally included. The main recommendations can be summarized as follows: (i) excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults-scheduled naps, modafinil, pitolisant, sodium oxybate (SXB), solriamfetol (all strong); methylphenidate, amphetamine derivatives (both weak); (ii) cataplexy in adults-SXB, venlafaxine, clomipramine (all strong) and pitolisant (weak); (iii) EDS in children-scheduled naps, SXB (both strong), modafinil, methylphenidate, pitolisant, amphetamine derivatives (all weak); (iv) cataplexy in children-SXB (strong), antidepressants (weak). Treatment choices should be tailored to each patient's symptoms, comorbidities, tolerance and risk of potential drug interactions.

CONCLUSION

The management of narcolepsy involves non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches with an increasing number of symptomatic treatment options for adults and children that have been studied in some detail.

European guideline and expert statements on the management of narcolepsy in adults and children

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Narcolepsy is an uncommon hypothalamic disorder of presumed autoimmune origin that usually requires lifelong treatment. This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of narcolepsy in both adults and children.

METHODS

The European Academy of Neurology (EAN), European Sleep Research Society (ESRS) and European Narcolepsy Network (EU-NN) nominated a task force of 18 narcolepsy specialists. According to the EAN recommendations, 10 relevant clinical questions were formulated in PICO format. Following a systematic review of the literature (performed in Fall 2018 and updated in July 2020) recommendations were developed according to the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

A total of 10,247 references were evaluated, 308 studies were assessed and 155 finally included. The main recommendations can be summarized as follows: (i) excessive daytime sleepiness in adults-scheduled naps, modafinil, pitolisant, sodium oxybate (SXB), solriamfetol (all strong), methylphenidate, amphetamine derivates (both weak); (ii) cataplexy in adults-SXB, venlafaxine, clomipramine (all strong) and pitolisant (weak); (iii) excessive daytime sleepiness in children-scheduled naps, SXB (both strong), modafinil, methylphenidate, pitolisant, amphetamine derivates (all weak); (iv) cataplexy in children-SXB (strong), antidepressants (weak). Treatment choices should be tailored to each patient's symptoms, comorbidities, tolerance and risk of potential drug interactions.

CONCLUSION

The management of narcolepsy involves non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches with an increasing number of symptomatic treatment options for adults and children that have been studied in some detail.

Sleepiness Behind the Wheel and the Implementation of European Driving Regulations

Sleep disturbance and sleepiness are established risk factors for driving accidents and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most prevalent medical disorder associated with excessive daytime sleepiness. Because effective treatment of OSA reduces accident risk, several jurisdictions have implemented regulations concerning the ability of patients with OSA to drive, unless effectively treated. This review provides a practical guide for clinicians who may be requested to certify a patient with OSA as fit to drive regarding the scope of the problem, the role of questionnaires and driving simulators to evaluate sleepiness, and the benefit of treatment on accident risk.

Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Mechanisms and Clinical Management

Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), which can negatively affect daily functioning, cognition, mood, and other aspects of well-being. Although EDS can be reduced with primary OSA treatment, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience EDS despite receiving optimized therapy for OSA. This article reviews the pathophysiology and clinical evaluation and management of EDS in patients with OSA. The mechanisms underlying EDS in CPAP-treated patients remain unclear. Experimental risk factors include chronic intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation, which lead to oxidative injury and changes in neurons and brain circuit connectedness involving noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission in wake-promoting regions of the brain. In addition, neuroimaging studies have shown alterations in the brain's white matter and gray matter in patients with OSA and EDS. Clinical management of EDS begins with ruling out other potential causes of EDS and evaluating its severity. Tools to evaluate EDS include objective and self-reported assessments of sleepiness, as well as cognitive assessments. Patients who experience residual EDS despite primary OSA therapy may benefit from wake-promoting pharmacotherapy. Agents that inhibit reuptake of dopamine or of dopamine and norepinephrine (modafinil/armodafinil and solriamfetol, respectively) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing EDS and improving quality of life in patients with OSA. Additional research is needed on the effects of wake-promoting treatments on cognition in these patients and to identify individual or disorder-specific responses.

Solriamfetol for the Management of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

OBJECTIVE

To review efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of solriamfetol for management of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

PubMed (1966 to January 2021) was searched using the terms solriamfetol, JZP-110, ADX-N05 and Sunosi. Human studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals in English language were reviewed.

RESULTS

The efficacy and safety of solriamfetol has been reported in 2 phase II trials and 4 phase III trials (TONES 2, TONES 3, TONES 4, and TONES 5). Statistically significant improvements in the maintenance of wakefulness test were reported with solriamfetol 150 mg and 300 mg vs placebo in participants with narcolepsy (7.65- to 10.14-minute difference from placebo). In subjects with OSA, statistically significant improvements in maintenance of wakefulness test difference from placebo were also observed in those taking solriamfetol 75 mg, 150 mg, or 300 mg vs placebo (4.5- to 12.8-minute difference from placebo). Statistically significant reductions in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were also reported in phase III trials in subjects with narcolepsy or OSA taking solriamfetol vs placebo (ranging from - 4.7 to - 1.9 difference from placebo). Common adverse events in reported in phase III trials were headache, nausea, decreased appetite, anxiety, dry mouth, and diarrhea. Solriamfetol appears to have a reduced risk for drug interactions and fewer adverse effects compared to other agents available for management of EDS in patients with narcolepsy and OSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Solriamfetol is an effective option for management of EDS in patients with narcolepsy and OSA.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled, 4-Period Crossover Study of the Effects of Solriamfetol on QTcF Intervals in Healthy Participants

Solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (United States and European Union; Sunosi) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/day) or obstructive sleep apnea (37.5-150 mg/day). A thorough QT/QTc study assessed solriamfetol effects on QT interval (Fridericia correction for heart rate; QTcF). This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-period crossover study compared single doses of 300 and 900 mg solriamfetol, 400 mg moxifloxacin, and placebo in healthy adults. Placebo- and predose-adjusted mean differences in QTcF (ddQTcF; primary end point) were analyzed, and solriamfetol pharmacokinetics were characterized. Fifty-five participants completed all periods. Upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for ddQTcF for both solriamfetol doses were <10 milliseconds at all postdose time points. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin; lower bounds of 2-sided 90%CIs for ddQTcF > 5 milliseconds at 1, 2, and 3 hours postdose. There were no QTcF increases > 60 milliseconds or QTcF values > 480 milliseconds at either solriamfetol dose. Solriamfetol median tmax was 2-3 hours; exposure was dose-proportional. More participants experienced adverse events (AEs) after solriamfetol 900 versus 300 mg (70% vs 29%); none were serious (all mild/moderate), and there were no deaths. Common AEs were nausea, dizziness, and palpitations. Neither solriamfetol dose resulted in QTcF prolongation > 10 milliseconds.

Profile of Solriamfetol in the Management of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy or Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Focus on Patient Selection and Perspectives

Excessive sleepiness (ES) is a symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and narcolepsy that has severe consequences. Wake-promoting drugs and stimulants are utilized as accessory treatment in OSA to reduce propensity to sleep but they do not improve sleep-disordered breathing. Solriamfetol is a first-line therapeutic agent to combat sleepiness in OSA and narcolepsy patients that is approved both by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For excessively sleepy adult patients with OSA despite primary treatment or narcolepsy patients without cataplexy, solriamfetol may be used as initial therapy or as replacement therapy in patients who fail treatment or experience unacceptable side effects with modafinil, armodafinil, pitolisant, or stimulants. It can also be used as add-on therapy in OSA or narcolepsy patients when ES is only partially controlled with modafinil, armodafinil, pitolisant, sodium oxybate, or stimulants. Solriamfetol is a phenylalanine derivative whose wake-promoting action may be mediated through its selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. This paper reviews the profile of solriamfetol in treating ES associated with OSA or narcolepsy and discusses patient selection and clinical perspectives. Mechanism of action, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of solriamfetol are described. The Treatment of OSA and Narcolepsy Excessive Sleepiness (TONES) solriamfetol trials demonstrated the efficacy of solriamfetol in reducing propensity to sleep and maintaining wakefulness, with significant improvements in mean maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) sleep latencies and significant reduction in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores compared to placebo. With solriamfetol, significantly higher percentages of patients showed improvement in patient's and clinician's global impression of change.

Efficacy and safety of solriamfetol for excessive sleepiness in narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea: findings from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Solriamfetol is developed for the treatment of excessive sleepiness in adult patients with narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). No systematic review of existing literature has been investigated before. Therefore, the meta-analysis is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of solriamfetol for excessive sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched from earliest date to July 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the primary outcomes were change from baseline in mean sleep latency and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).

RESULTS

We pooled 1177 patients from five RCTs and found solriamfetol led to a significant increment in mean sleep latency (MD = 9.52, 95% CI: 7.60 to 11.44, P < 0.00001) and a reduction in ESS score (MD = -3.74, 95% CI: -4.38 to -3.09, P < 0.00001) compared with placebo. The proportion of patients with at least one adverse event was significantly increased in solriamfetol group (RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.64, P < 0.00001), while no statistical differences existed in the risk of at least one serious adverse event between solriamfetol and controlled group (RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.24 to 3.77, P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

A dose of 150 mg solriamfetol is proved to be the appropriate and stable dose for excessive sleepiness. In addition, solriamfetol showed good efficacy for excessive sleepiness in narcolepsy and OSA but also significantly increases the risk of adverse events.

A practical guide to the pharmacological and behavioral therapy of Narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a rare, chronic, and disabling central nervous system hypersomnia; two forms can be recognized: narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2). Its etiology is still largely unknown, but studies have reported a strong association between NT1 and HLA, as well as a pathogenic association with the deficiency of cerebrospinal hypocretin-1. Thus, the most reliable pathogenic hypothesis is an autoimmune process destroying hypothalamic hypocretin-producing cells. A definitive cure for narcolepsy is not available to date, and although the research in the field is highly promising, up to now, current treatments have aimed to reduce the symptoms by means of different pharmacological approaches. Moreover, overall narcolepsy symptoms management can also benefit from non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) and psychosocial interventions to improve the patients' quality of life in both adult and pediatric-affected individuals as well as the well-being of their families. In this review, we summarize the available therapeutic options for narcolepsy, including the pharmacological, behavioral, and psychosocial interventions.