1
|
Coury J, Coronado G, Currier JJ, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Badicke B, Myers E, Davis MM. Methods for scaling up an outreach intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in rural areas. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:6. [PMID: 38191536 PMCID: PMC10775579 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00540-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and patient navigation are evidence-based practices shown to improve rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) and follow-up in various settings, yet these programs have not been broadly adopted by health systems and organizations that serve diverse populations. Reasons for low adoption rates are multifactorial, and little research explores approaches for scaling up a complex, multi-level CRC screening outreach intervention to advance equity in rural settings. METHODS SMARTER CRC, a National Cancer Institute Cancer Moonshot project, is a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed FIT and patient navigation program involving 3 Medicaid health plans and 28 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho followed by a national scale-up trial. The SMARTER CRC intervention combines mailed FIT outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. We applied the framework from Perez and colleagues to identify the intervention's components (including functions and forms) and scale-up dissemination strategies and worked with a national advisory board to support scale-up to additional organizations. The team is recruiting health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations in the USA that serve a rural population. To teach organizations about the intervention, activities include Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) tele-mentoring learning collaboratives, a facilitation guide and other materials, a patient navigation workshop, webinars, and individualized technical assistance. Our primary outcome is program adoption (by component), measured 6 months after participation in an ECHO learning collaborative. We also assess engagement and adaptations (implemented and desired) to learn how the multicomponent intervention might be modified to best support broad scale-up. DISCUSSION Findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI's Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP no.: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | | | - Jessica J Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| | | | - Brittany Badicke
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Emily Myers
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, OHSU, Portland, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, OHSU, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coury J, Coronado GD, Myers E, Patzel M, Thompson J, Whidden-Rivera C, Davis MM. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2024; 18:47-59. [PMID: 38661826 PMCID: PMC11047025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are disproportionately high among rural residents and Medicaid enrollees. OBJECTIVES To address disparities, we used a modified community engagement approach, Boot Camp Translation (BCT). Research partners, an advisory board, and the rural community informed messaging about CRC outreach and a mailed fecal immunochemical test program. METHODS Eligible rural patients (English-speaking and ages 50-74) and clinic staff involved in patient outreach participated in a BCT conducted virtually over two months. We applied qualitative analysis to BCT transcripts and field notes. RESULTS Key themes included: the importance of directly communicating about the seriousness of cancer, leveraging close clinic-patient relationships, and communicating the test safety, ease, and low cost. CONCLUSIONS Using a modified version of BCT delivered in a virtual format, we were able to successfully capture community input to adapt a CRC outreach program for use in rural settings. Program materials will be tested during a pragmatic trial to address rural CRC screening disparities.
Collapse
|
3
|
Petrik AF, Coury J, Larson JH, Badicke B, Coronado GD, Davis MM. Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics. J Am Board Fam Med 2023; 36:118-129. [PMID: 36759133 PMCID: PMC10187985 DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220216r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are disproportionately high among rural residents despite the availability of effective screening methods. Outreach activities can improve CRC screening rates but rely on accurate identification of patients due for screening. We report on data challenges in rural clinics and Medicaid health plans in Oregon in identifying patients eligible for CRC screening, in a large project implementing mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) and patient navigation. METHODS We analyzed data from clinic intake surveys and administrative claims. Clinics were asked to identify total population numbers relevant to CRC screening and follow-up. Health plans also identified enrollees eligible for CRC screening in Spring, 2021. Clinic staff validated patient lists for eligibility using their electronic health records (EHR). RESULTS EHR features varied across the 29 participating and 28 responding clinics. Among the 28 responding clinics, 21 were able to report their Medicaid population (75%), 19 reported the number of patients aged 50 to 75 (68%) and the number screened for CRC in the last year (68%). Only 8 (29%) were able to report screening details such as number screened by FIT and 9 were able to report on patients with an abnormal FIT or colonoscopy completed after FIT (32%). Health plans had challenges properly identifying where enrollees received care and had missing data for race and ethnicity (range 22 to 34% unknown race, <1% to 24% unknown ethnicity). DISCUSSION Most participating rural primary care clinics and Medicaid health plans experienced challenges identifying the population due for a CRC screening outreach program. Better EHR functionality and data reporting capabilities could help rural clinics apply population-based strategies and ultimately attenuate disparities in cancer screening and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda F Petrik
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD).
| | - Jennifer Coury
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD)
| | - Jean Hiebert Larson
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD)
| | - Brittany Badicke
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD)
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD)
| | - Melinda M Davis
- From the Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest (AFP, GDC); Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, (JC, JHL, BB, MMD); and Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University (MMD)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coronado GD, Leo MC, Ramsey K, Coury J, Petrik AF, Patzel M, Kenzie ES, Thompson JH, Brodt E, Mummadi R, Elder N, Davis MM. Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:42. [PMID: 35418107 PMCID: PMC9006522 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Screening reduces incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet US screening rates are low, particularly among Medicaid enrollees in rural communities. We describe a two-phase project, SMARTER CRC, designed to achieve the National Cancer Institute Cancer MoonshotSM objectives by reducing the burden of CRC on the US population. Specifically, SMARTER CRC aims to test the implementation, effectiveness, and maintenance of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program to improve rates of CRC screening, follow-up colonoscopy, and referral to care in clinics serving rural Medicaid enrollees. Methods Phase I activities in SMARTER CRC include a two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mailed fecal test and patient navigation program involving three Medicaid health plans and 30 rural primary care practices in Oregon and Idaho; the implementation of the program is supported by training and practice facilitation. Participating clinic units were randomized 1:1 into the intervention or usual care. The intervention combines (1) mailed fecal testing outreach supported by clinics, health plans, and vendors and (2) patient navigation for colonoscopy following an abnormal fecal test result. We will evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance of the intervention and track adaptations to the intervention and to implementation strategies, using quantitative and qualitative methods. Our primary effectiveness outcome is receipt of any CRC screening within 6 months of enrollee identification. Our primary implementation outcome is health plan- and clinic-level rates of program delivery, by component (mailed FIT and patient navigation). Trial results will inform phase II activities to scale up the program through partnerships with health plans, primary care clinics, and regional and national organizations that serve rural primary care clinics; scale-up will include webinars, train-the-trainer workshops, and collaborative learning activities. Discussion This study will test the implementation, effectiveness, and scale-up of a multi-component mailed fecal testing and patient navigation program to improve CRC screening rates in rural Medicaid enrollees. Our findings may inform approaches for adapting and scaling evidence-based approaches to promote CRC screening participation in underserved populations and settings. Trial registration Registered at clinicaltrial.gov (NCT04890054) and at the NCI’s Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP #: NCI-2021-01032) on May 11, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Michael C Leo
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Katrina Ramsey
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Biostatistics and Design Program, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: CB669, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Mary Patzel
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Erin S Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Jamie H Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Erik Brodt
- OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Raj Mummadi
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Nancy Elder
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU Family Medicine, OHSU School of Medicine, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.,OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail code: L222, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coury J, Ramsey K, Gunn R, Judkins J, Davis M. Source matters: a survey of cost variation for fecal immunochemical tests in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:204. [PMID: 35168616 PMCID: PMC8845335 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07576-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can improve health outcomes, but screening rates remain low across the US. Mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are an effective way to increase CRC screening rates, but is still underutilized. In particular, cost of FIT has not been explored in relation to practice characteristics, FIT selection, and screening outreach approaches. Methods We administered a cross-sectional survey drawing from prior validated measures to 252 primary care practices to assess characteristics and context that could affect the implementation of direct mail fecal testing programs, including the cost, source of test, and types of FIT used. We analyzed the range of costs for the tests, and identified practice and test procurement factors. We examined the distributions of practice characteristics for FIT use and costs answers using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We used Pearson’s chi-squared test of association and interpreted a low p-value (e.g. < 0.05) as evidence of association between a given practice characteristic and knowing the cost of FIT or fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Results Among the 84 viable practice survey responses, more than 10 different types of FIT/FOBTs were in use; 76% of practices used one of the five most common FIT types. Only 40 practices (48%) provided information on FIT costs. Thirteen (32%) of these practices received the tests for free while 27 (68%) paid for their tests; median reported cost of a FIT was $3.04, with a range from $0.83 to $6.41 per test. Costs were not statistically significantly different by FIT type. However, practices who received FITs from manufacturer’s vendors were more likely to know the cost (p = 0.0002) and, if known, report a higher cost (p = 0.0002). Conclusions Our findings indicate that most practices without lab or health system supplied FITs are spending more to procure tests. Cost of FIT may impact the willingness of practices to distribute FITs through population outreach strategies, such as mailed FIT. Differences in the ability to obtain FIT tests in a cost-effective manner could have consequences for implementation of outreach programs that address colorectal cancer screening disparities in primary care practices. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07576-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L222, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.
| | - Katrina Ramsey
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L222, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA
| | | | - Jon Judkins
- Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Melinda Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L222, Portland, Oregon, 97239, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.,OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baldwin LM, Coronado GD, West II, Schwartz MR, Meenan RT, Vollmer WM, Petrik AF, Shapiro JA, Kulkarni-Sharma YR, Green BB. Health plan-based mailed fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening among dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees: Outcomes of 2 program models. Cancer 2022; 128:410-418. [PMID: 34586630 PMCID: PMC9793727 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health insurance plans are increasingly offering mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but few studies have compared the outcomes of different program models (eg, invitation strategies). METHODS This study compares the outcomes of 2 health plan-based mailed FIT program models. In the first program (2016), FIT kits were mailed to all eligible enrollees; in the second program (2018), FIT kits were mailed only to enrollees who opted in after an outreach phone call. Participants in this observational study included dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees who were aged 50 to 75 years and were due for CRC screening (1799 in 2016 and 1906 in 2018). Six-month FIT completion rates, implementation outcomes (eg, mailed FITs sent and reminders attempted), and program-related health plan costs for each program are described. RESULTS All 1799 individuals in 2016 were sent an introductory letter and a FIT kit. In 2018, all 1906 were sent an introductory letter, and 1905 received at least 1 opt-in call attempt, with 410 (21.5%) sent a FIT. The FIT completion rate was 16.2% (292 of 1799 [95% CI, 14.5%-17.9%]) in 2016 and 14.6% (278 of 1906 [95% CI, 13.0%-16.2%]) in 2018 (P = .36). The overall implementation costs were higher in 2016 ($40,156) than 2018 ($34,899), with the cost per completed FIT slightly higher in 2016 ($138) than 2018 ($126). CONCLUSIONS An opt-in mailed FIT program achieved FIT completion rates similar to those of a program mailing to all dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees. LAY SUMMARY Health insurance plans can use different program models to successfully mail fecal test kits for colorectal cancer screening to dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees, with nearly 1 in 6 enrollees completing fecal testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gloria D. Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Imara I. West
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Malaika R. Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard T. Meenan
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - William M. Vollmer
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jean A. Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Beverly B. Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Green BB, Baldwin LM, West II, Schwartz M, Coronado GD. Low Rates of Colonoscopy Follow-up After a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Medicaid Health Plan Delivered Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 11:2150132720958525. [PMID: 32912056 PMCID: PMC7488888 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720958525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is necessary for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to be effective. We report colonoscopy follow-up rates after a positive FIT overall and by population characteristics in the BeneFIT demonstration pilot, a Medicaid health insurance plan-delivered mailed FIT outreach program. METHODS In 2016, 2 health insurance plans in Oregon and in Washington state mailed FIT kits to Medicaid patients who, based on claims data, were overdue for CRC screening. We report follow-up colonoscopy completion rates after positive FIT, and differences in completion rates by age, sex, race, ethnicity, preferred language, and number of primary care visits in the prior year. This research was human subjects approved with a waiver of consent for data collection. RESULTS The FIT positivity rates in Health Plan Oregon and Health Plan Washington were 7.9% (39/488) and 14.6% (125/857), respectively. Colonoscopy completion rates within 12 months of the positive test were 35.9% (14/41) in Health Plan Oregon and 32.8% (41/125) in Health Plan Washington. Colonoscopy completion rates were higher among individuals who preferred a language other than English (Non-English speakers 70.0%, English speakers 31.3%, P = .04). CONCLUSION In a health plan-delivered mailed FIT outreach program, follow-up colonoscopy rates after a positive test were low. Additional interventions are needed to assure colonoscopy after a positive FIT test and to reap the benefits of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Coury J, Miech EJ, Styer P, Petrik AF, Coates KE, Green BB, Baldwin LM, Shapiro JA, Coronado GD. What's the "secret sauce"? How implementation variation affects the success of colorectal cancer screening outreach. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:5. [PMID: 33431063 PMCID: PMC7802298 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-020-00104-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) programs can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates, but health systems vary how they implement (i.e., adapt) these programs for their organizations. A health insurance plan implemented a mailed FIT program (named BeneFIT), and participating health systems could adapt the program. This multi-method study explored which program adaptations might have resulted in higher screening rates. METHODS First, we conducted a descriptive analysis of CRC screening rates by key health system characteristics and program adaptations. Second, we generated an overall model by fitting a weighted regression line to our data. Third, we applied Configurational Comparative Methods (CCMs) to determine how combinations of conditions were linked to higher screening rates. The main outcome measure was CRC screening rates. RESULTS Seventeen health systems took part in at least 1 year of BeneFIT. The overall screening completion rate was 20% (4-28%) in year 1 and 25% (12-35%) in year 2 of the program. Health systems that used two or more adaptations had higher screening rates, and no single adaptation clearly led to higher screening rates. In year 1, small systems, with just one clinic, that used phone reminders (n = 2) met the implementation success threshold (≥ 19% screening rate) while systems with > 1 clinic were successful when offering a patient incentive (n = 4), scrubbing mailing lists (n = 4), or allowing mailed FIT returns with no other adaptations (n = 1). In year 2, larger systems with 2-4 clinics were successful with a phone reminder (n = 4) or a patient incentive (n = 3). Of the 10 systems that implemented BeneFIT in both years, seven improved their CRC screening rates in year 2. CONCLUSIONS Health systems can choose among many adaptations and successfully implement a health plan's mailed FIT program. Different combinations of adaptations led to success with health system size emerging as an important contextual factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd., Mail Code L222, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Edward J Miech
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Patricia Styer
- Business Administration, Southern Oregon University, Ashland, OR, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kelly E Coates
- Quality Improvement Program Administrator, CareOregon, Inc., Portland, OR, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jean A Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petrik AF, Green B, Schneider J, Miech EJ, Coury J, Retecki S, Coronado GD. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:815-822. [PMID: 33107003 PMCID: PMC7652967 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06186-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based programs such as mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can only affect health outcomes if they can be successfully implemented. However, attempts to implement programs are often limited by organizational-level factors. OBJECTIVES As part of the Strategies and Opportunities to Stop Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) pragmatic trial, we evaluated how organizational factors impacted the extent to which health centers implemented a mailed FIT outreach program. DESIGN Eight health centers participated in STOP CRC. The intervention consisted of customized electronic health record tools and clinical staff training to facilitate mailing of an introduction letter, FIT kit, and reminder letter. Health centers had flexibility in how they delivered the program. MAIN MEASURES We categorized the health centers' level of implementation based on the proportion of eligible patients who were mailed a FIT kit, and applied configurational comparative methods to identify combinations of relevant organizational-level and program-level factors that distinguished among high, medium, and low implementing health centers. The factors were categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research model. KEY RESULTS FIT tests were mailed to 21.0-81.7% of eligible participants at each health center. We identified a two-factor solution that distinguished among levels of implementation with 100% consistency and 100% coverage. The factors were having a centralized implementation team (inner setting) and mailing the introduction letter in advance of the FIT kit (intervention characteristics). Health centers with high levels of implementation had the joint presence of both factors. In health centers with medium levels of implementation, only one factor was present. Health centers with low levels of implementation had neither factor present. CONCLUSIONS Full implementation of the STOP CRC intervention relied on a centralized implementation team with dedicated staffing time, and the advance mailing of an introduction letter. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01742065 Registered 05 December 2012-Prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Beverly Green
- Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jennifer Schneider
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Coronado GD, Schneider JL, Green BB, Coury JK, Schwartz MR, Kulkarni-Sharma Y, Baldwin LM. Health plan adaptations to a mailed outreach program for colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: the BeneFIT study. Implement Sci 2020; 15:77. [PMID: 32933525 PMCID: PMC7493880 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01037-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Promoting uptake of evidence-based innovations in healthcare systems requires attention to how innovations are adapted to enhance their fit with a given setting. Little is known about real-world variation in how programs are delivered over time and across multiple populations and contexts, and what motivates adaptations. Methods As part of the BeneFIT study of mailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) to increase colorectal cancer screening, we interviewed 9 leaders from two participating Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans to examine adaptations to their health plan-initiated mailed FIT outreach programs in the second year of implementation. We applied an adaptation and modification model developed by Stirman and colleagues to document content and context modifications made to the two programs. Results Both health plans made substantial changes to their programs in the second year; adaptations differed substantially across health plans. In Health Plan Oregon, adaptations generally targeted health centers and member populations, most content adaptations involved tailoring program components, and the program was expanded to four additional health centers. In contrast, Health Plan Washington’s second-year content adaptations were primarily at the level of members, and generally involved adding program components. Moreover, Health Plan Washington undertook large-scale context adaptations to the setting where the program was led (local vs. national), the personnel who administered the program (vendor and staffing), and the population selected for outreach (limiting outreach to dual-eligible members). Conclusions Both programs implemented a variety of adaptations that reflected the values and incentives of the broader health plan contexts. Financial incentives for screening allowed Health Plan Oregon to expand but led Health Plan Washington to offer more targeted outreach to a subset of eligible enrollees. The breadth of changes made by each health system reflects the necessity of evaluating programs in context and adjusting to specific challenges as they are identified. Further research is needed to understand the effects of these types of adaptations on program efficiency and enrollee and health system outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
| | - Jennifer L Schneider
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N. Interstate Ave., Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Malaika R Schwartz
- University of Washington Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Laura Mae Baldwin
- University of Washington Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meenan RT, Baldwin LM, Coronado GD, Schwartz M, Coury J, Petrik AF, West II, Green BB. Costs of Two Health Insurance Plan Programs to Mail Fecal Immunochemical Tests to Medicare and Medicaid Plan Members. Popul Health Manag 2020; 24:255-265. [PMID: 32609077 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2020.0041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BeneFIT is a 4-year observational study of a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program in 2 Medicaid/Medicare health plans in Oregon and Washington. In Health Plan Oregon's (HPO) collaborative model, HPO mails FITs that enrollees return to their clinics for processing. In Health Plan Washington's (HPW) centralized model, FITs are mailed directly to enrollees who return them to a centralized laboratory. This paper examines model-specific Year 1 development and implementation costs and estimates costs per screened enrollee. Staff completed activity-based costing spreadsheets. Non-labor costs were from study and external data. Data matched each plan's 2016 development and implementation dates. HPO development costs were $23.0K, primarily administration (eg, clinic recruitment). HPW development costs were $37.3K, 38.8% for FIT selection and mailing/tracking protocols. Year 1 implementation costs were $51.6K for HPO and $139.7K for HPW, reflecting HPW's greater outreach. Labor was 50.4% ($26.0K) of HPO's implementation costs, primarily enrollee eligibility and processing returned FITs, and was shared by HPO ($17.0K) and 6 participating clinics ($9.0K). Labor was 10.5% of HPW's implementation costs, primarily administration and enrollee eligibility. HPO's implementation costs per enrollee were 12.3% higher ($18.36) than for HPW ($16.34). Similar proportions of completed FITs among screening-eligibles produced a 15% lower cost per completed FIT in HPW ($89.75) vs. HPO ($105.79). Implementation costs for HPO only (without clinic costs) were $15.16/mailed introductory letter, $16.09/mailed FIT, and $87.35/completed FIT, comparable to HPW. Results highlight cost implications of different approaches to implementing a mailed FIT program in 2 Medicaid/Medicare health plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Meenan
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Malaika Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Imara I West
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Family Medicine, Washington Permanente Medical Group, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Green BB, West II, Baldwin LM, Schwartz MR, Coury J, Coronado GD. Challenges in Reaching Medicaid and Medicare Enrollees in a Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Program. J Community Health 2020; 45:916-921. [PMID: 32219712 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00809-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BeneFIT was a demonstration project that worked with a Medicaid/Medicare health plan to implement a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) program. The goal was to reach age-eligible enrollees who were due for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and prompt them to complete a FIT. One health insurance plan collaborated with six federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in Oregon. Reach was defined as the percent of eligible individuals overdue for CRC screening who were mailed a FIT in 2016. We examined patient-level factors associated with reach, using multivariable log binomial regression and FIT completion rates at 6 months. The health plan identified 3386 age-eligible members overdue for CRC screening. Of these, 2615 (77.2%) were reached (mailed FIT kits) and 771 (22.8%) were not; 478 (14.1%) because they were not considered to be clinic patients and 290 (8.6%) because of mailing issues. Patient-level factors associated with not being reached were: being male, being Medicaid-insured (vs. Medicare), and having no primary care visits (vs. 4+ visits) in the last year. Among all enrollees identified as overdue for CRC screening, FIT completion rates at 6 months were 14.8% overall and 18.5% in the subgroup reached. In a mailed FIT program, a health insurance plan attempted to reach as many enrollees overdue for CRC screening as possible, however 22.8% were not mailed a FIT. Additional efforts are needed to ensure that the hardest to reach enrollees can participate in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Av. Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
| | - Imara I West
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Laura Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Malaika R Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baldwin LM, Schneider JL, Schwartz M, Rivelli JS, Green BB, Petrik AF, Coronado GD. First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:132. [PMID: 32085767 PMCID: PMC7035739 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4868-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among certain racial and ethnic groups and the uninsured and Medicaid insured. Clinics and health care systems have adopted population-based mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) programs to increase screening, and now health insurance plans are beginning to implement mailed FIT programs. We report on challenges to and successes of mailed FIT programs during their first year of implementation in two health plans serving Medicaid and dual eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees. Methods This qualitative descriptive study gathered data through in-depth interviews with staff and leaders at each health plan (n = 10). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, field notes from program planning meetings between the research team and the health plans, and internal research team debriefs informed interview guide development. Qualitative research staff used Atlas.ti to code the health plan interviews and develop summary themes through an iterative content analysis approach. Results We identified first-year implementation challenges in five thematic areas: 1) program design, 2) vendor experience, 3) engagement/communication, 4) reaction/satisfaction of stakeholders, and 5) processing/returning of mailed kits. Commonly experienced challenges by both health plans related to the time-consuming nature of the programs to set up, and complexities and delays in working with vendors. We found implementation successes in the same five thematic areas as well as four additional areas of: 1) leadership support, 2) compatibility with the health plan, 3) broader impacts, and 4) collaboration with researchers. Commonly experienced successes included the ability to adapt the mailed FIT program to the individual health plan culture and needs, and the synchronicity between the programs and their organizational missions and goals. Conclusions Both health plans successfully adapted mailed FIT programs to their own culture and resources and used their strong quality management resources to maximize success in overcoming the time demands of setting up the program and working with their vendors. Mailed FIT programs administered by health plans, especially those serving Medicaid- and dual eligible Medicaid/Medicare-insured populations, may be an important resource to support closing gaps in colorectal cancer screening among traditionally underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354696, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | | | - Malaika Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Box 354696, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | | | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Coronado GD, Green BB, West II, Schwartz MR, Coury JK, Vollmer WM, Shapiro JA, Petrik AF, Baldwin LM. Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer 2019; 126:540-548. [PMID: 31658375 PMCID: PMC7004121 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer screening uptake is low, particularly among individuals enrolled in Medicaid. To the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the effectiveness of direct‐to‐member outreach by Medicaid health insurance plans to raise colorectal cancer screening use, nor how best to deliver such outreach. Methods BeneFIT is a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness study of 2 program models that health plans developed for a mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) intervention. The programs differed with regard to whether they used a centralized approach (Health Plan Washington) or collaborated with health centers (Health Plan Oregon). The primary implementation outcome of the current study was the percentage of eligible enrollees to whom the plans delivered each intervention component. The primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of FIT completion within 6 months of mailing of the introductory letter. Results The health plans identified 12,000 eligible enrollees (8551 in Health Plan Washington and 3449 in Health Plan Oregon). Health Plan Washington mailed an introductory letter and FIT kit to 8551 enrollees (100%) and delivered a reminder call to 839 (10.3% of the 8132 attempted). Health Plan Oregon mailed an introductory letter, and a letter and FIT kit plus a reminder postcard to 2812 enrollees (81.5%) and 2650 enrollees (76.8%), respectively. FIT completion rates were 18.2% (1557 of 8551 enrollees) in Health Plan Washington. In Health Plan Oregon, completion rates were 17.4% (488 of 2812 enrollees) among enrollees who were mailed an introductory letter and 18.3% (484 of 2650 enrollees) among enrollees who also were mailed a FIT kit plus reminder postcard. Conclusions The implementation of mailed FIT outreach by health plans may be effective and could reach many individuals at risk of developing colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening uptake is low, particularly among individuals enrolled in Medicaid. The implementation of mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach among health plans may be effective and could reach many individuals at risk of developing colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria D Coronado
- The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Beverly B Green
- Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Imara I West
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Malaika R Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - William M Vollmer
- The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jean A Shapiro
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Amanda F Petrik
- The Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon
| | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Green BB, Coronado GD, Schwartz M, Coury J, Baldwin LM. Using a continuum of hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies to put research-tested colorectal screening interventions into practice. Implement Sci 2019; 14:53. [PMID: 31142348 PMCID: PMC6542058 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0903-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few previous studies have applied the hybrid effectiveness-implementation design framework to illustrate the way in which an intervention was progressively implemented and evaluated across multiple studies in diverse settings. Methods We describe the design components and methodologies of three studies that sought to improve rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using mailed outreach, and apply domains put forth by Curran et al.: research aims, research questions, comparison conditions, sample, evaluation methods, measures, and potential challenges. The Hybrid 1 study (emphasis on effectiveness) was a patient-level randomized trial of a mailed fecal test and stepped phone-outreach intervention program delivered in an integrated healthcare system (21 clinics, 4673 patients). The primary outcome was effectiveness (CRC screening uptake). Implementation outcomes included cost-effectiveness and acceptability. The Hybrid 2 study (shared emphasis on effectiveness and implementation) was a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial of mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach implemented at safety net clinics (26 clinics, 41,000 patients). The intervention used electronic health record tools (adapted from Hybrid 1) and clinic personnel to deliver the intervention. Outcomes included effectiveness (FIT completion) and implementation (FIT kits delivered, clinic barriers and facilitators, cost-effectiveness). Hybrid 3 study (emphasis on implementation) is a demonstration project being conducted by two Medicaid/Medicare insurance plans (2 states, 12,000 patients) comparing two strategies for implementing mailed FIT programs that addressed Hybrid 2 implementation barriers. Outcomes include implementation (activities delivered, barriers) and effectiveness (FIT completion). Results The effectiveness-implementation typology successfully identified a number of distinguishing features between the three studies. Two additional features, program design and program delivery, varied across our studies, and we propose adding them to the current typology. Program design and program delivery reflect the process by which and by whom a program is designed and delivered (e.g., research staff vs. clinic/health plan staff). Conclusions We describe three studies that demonstrate the hybrid effectiveness to implementation continuum and make recommendations for expanding the hybrid typology to include new descriptive features. Additional comparisons of Hybrid 1, 2, and 3 studies may help confirm whether our hybrid typology refinements are generalizable markers of the pipeline from research to practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
| | - Gloria D Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Malaika Schwartz
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Laura-Mae Baldwin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|