Involvement of T helper 17 cells in D-penicillamine-induced autoimmune disease in Brown Norway rats

The Role of Myeloperoxidase in Clozapine-Induced Inflammation: A Mechanistic Update for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Agranulocytosis

The risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG) markedly constrains the use of clozapine, a neuroleptic with unparalleled efficacy. Most clozapine patients experience an early inflammatory response, likely a necessary step in IDIAG onset. However, most patients do not progress to IDIAG, presumably because of the requirement of specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, T cell receptors, and other unknown factors. We established that clozapine activates inflammasomes and that myeloperoxidase bioactivation of clozapine generates neoantigens, but the connection between these early mechanistic events remained unknown and, thus, was the aim of this work. We found that the myeloperoxidase inhibitor PF-1355 attenuated myeloperoxidase activity in phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-differentiated THP-1 macrophages, and it also attenuated clozapine-induced release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1β, CXCL1, and C-reactive protein). In vivo, pretreatment of Sprague Dawley rats with PF-1355 significantly attenuated clozapine-induced increases in neutrophil mobilization from the bone marrow to the blood and spleen, as determined using differential blood counts and flow cytometry. Moreover, the clozapine-triggered release of inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-1β, calprotectin, CXCL1, and α-1-acid glycoprotein) from the liver, spleen, and bone marrow was dampened by myeloperoxidase inhibition. These data support the working hypothesis that oxidation of clozapine to a reactive metabolite by myeloperoxidase is critical for induction of the inflammatory response to clozapine. Ultimately, a better mechanistic understanding of the early events involved in the immune response to clozapine may elucidate ways to prevent IDIAG, enabling safer, more frequent therapeutic use of this and potentially other highly efficacious drugs.

Idiosyncratic Drug Reactions: A 35-Year Chemical Research in Toxicology Perspective

When Larry Marnett founded Chemical Research in Toxicology, the study of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) was in its infancy. There was evidence that IDRs involve chemically reactive metabolites, and many of the papers in Chemical Research in Toxicology investigated the bioactivation of drugs. However, it became clear that not all drugs that form reactive metabolites are associated with a high risk of IDRs, and some drugs that do not appear to form reactive metabolites do cause IDRs. Some of the early Chemical Research in Toxicology papers investigated involvement of the adaptive immune system in the mechanism of IDRs, and HLA associations provided strong evidence for an immune mechanism of IDRs. This led to the question of how reactive metabolites might induce an immune response. The classic hapten hypothesis provided an obvious explanation, but a new hypothesis the danger hypothesis, added another dimension. Although there are common features to IDRs, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are also many differences in the mechanisms caused by different drugs. Other pharmacological effects of drugs may also play a role in the mechanism, and that is obviously true of IDRs caused by biological agents. The requirement for specific HLA and T-cell receptors is presumably the major factor that makes IDRs idiosyncratic. However, an innate immune response is required to prime the adaptive immune response. In contrast to the adaptive immune response, the innate immune response is unlikely to be idiosyncratic, and studies of the innate immune response to drugs may provide a much more accurate way to screen drugs for their potential to cause IDRs. For essential drugs that are known to cause IDRs, it may be possible to markedly decrease risk by a slow dose titration to induce immune tolerance. Significant progress has been made in the study of IDRs, but there is still a long way to go.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanistic and Clinical Challenges

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains a significant problem for patients and drug development. The idiosyncratic nature of IDILI makes mechanistic studies difficult, and little is known of its pathogenesis for certain. Circumstantial evidence suggests that most, but not all, IDILI is caused by reactive metabolites of drugs that are bioactivated by cytochromes P450 and other enzymes in the liver. Additionally, there is overwhelming evidence that most IDILI is mediated by the adaptive immune system; one example being the association of IDILI caused by specific drugs with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, and this may in part explain the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions. The T cell receptor repertoire likely also contributes to the idiosyncratic nature. Although most of the liver injury is likely mediated by the adaptive immune system, specifically cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, adaptive immune activation first requires an innate immune response to activate antigen presenting cells and produce cytokines required for T cell proliferation. This innate response is likely caused by either a reactive metabolite or some form of cell stress that is clinically silent but not idiosyncratic. If this is true it would make it possible to study the early steps in the immune response that in some patients can lead to IDILI. Other hypotheses have been proposed, such as mitochondrial injury, inhibition of the bile salt export pump, unfolded protein response, and oxidative stress although, in most cases, it is likely that they are also involved in the initiation of an immune response rather than representing a completely separate mechanism. Using the clinical manifestations of liver injury from a number of examples of IDILI-associated drugs, this review aims to summarize and illustrate these mechanistic hypotheses.

"Autoimmune(-Like)" Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: New Insights into Molecular Pathogenesis

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and hepatic injury due to herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) can adapt clinical characteristics of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), such as the appearance of autoantibodies and infiltration of the liver by immune competent cells. To describe these cases of DILI/HDS, the poorly-defined term "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS came up. It is uncertain if these cases represent a subgroup of DILI/HDS with distinct pathomechanistic and prognostic features different from "classical" DILI/HDS. Besides, due to the overlap of clinical characteristics of "immune-mediated" DILI/HDS and AIH, both entities are not easy to differentiate. However, the demarcation is important, especially with regard to treatment: AIH requires long-term, mostly lifelong immunosuppression, whereas DILI/HDS does not. Only through exact diagnostic evaluation, exclusion of differential diagnoses and prolonged follow-up can the correct diagnosis reliably be made. Molecular mechanisms have not been analysed for the subgroup of "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS yet. However, several pathogenetic checkpoints of DILI/HDS in general and AIH are shared. An analysis of these shared mechanisms might hint at relevant molecular processes of "autoimmune(-like)" DILI/HDS.

Penicillamine and auto-immunity: Relationship or coincidence?

Drug induced lupus is an established and recognised entity, and penicillamine is one of the drugs that induce it. But the uncertainty remains: Could penicillamine trigger autoimmunity in a broad-spectrum or in a particular way?

Identification of consensus biomarkers for predicting non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens

The assessment of non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGHCs) is currently relying on two-year rodent bioassays. Toxicogenomics biomarkers provide a potential alternative method for the prioritization of NGHCs that could be useful for risk assessment. However, previous studies using inconsistently classified chemicals as the training set and a single microarray dataset concluded no consensus biomarkers. In this study, 4 consensus biomarkers of A2m, Ca3, Cxcl1, and Cyp8b1 were identified from four large-scale microarray datasets of the one-day single maximum tolerated dose and a large set of chemicals without inconsistent classifications. Machine learning techniques were subsequently applied to develop prediction models for NGHCs. The final bagging decision tree models were constructed with an average AUC performance of 0.803 for an independent test. A set of 16 chemicals with controversial classifications were reclassified according to the consensus biomarkers. The developed prediction models and identified consensus biomarkers are expected to be potential alternative methods for prioritization of NGHCs for further experimental validation.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (IDILI): Potential Mechanisms and Predictive Assays

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is a significant source of drug recall and acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. While current drug development processes emphasize general toxicity and drug metabolizing enzyme- (DME-) mediated toxicity, it has been challenging to develop comprehensive models for assessing complete idiosyncratic potential. In this review, we describe the enzymes and proteins that contain polymorphisms believed to contribute to IDILI, including ones that affect phase I and phase II metabolism, antioxidant enzymes, drug transporters, inflammation, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA). We then describe the various assays that have been developed to detect individual reactions focusing on each of the mechanisms described in the background. Finally, we examine current trends in developing comprehensive models for examining these mechanisms. There is an urgent need to develop a panel of multiparametric assays for diagnosing individual toxicity potential.

Protective effect of Th22 cells and intrahepatic IL-22 in drug induced hepatocellular injury

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Th22 cells regulate host immunity against pathogenic invasion, including protecting host against chronic hepatitis B; however, the relationship between drug induced liver injury (DILI) and Th22/Th17 cells is still unclear. We investigated the role of Th22 cells in DILI development.

METHODS

The frequencies of peripheral Th22/Th17/Th1 cells and intrahepatic IL-22/IL-17 production from DILI, non-DILI liver diseases, and healthy controls were examined. Plasma IL-22/IL-17 and the related cytokines were determined in DILI patients at week 0 (defined as the occurrence of liver injury within 7days), 4 and 24. Multivariable stepwise logistic regression was applied to explore the associations between various factors and recovery of DILI.

RESULTS

The frequencies of Th22/Th17 cells were significantly higher in DILI onset patients than HC. Significant increase of Th22 cells and the related cytokines levels was observed in DILI with hepatocellular injury type. There was a positive correlation between intrahepatic IL-22 level and liver regeneration. Plasma IL-22 level was higher in DILI patients with improved liver function than unimproved function. Multivariable analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) of plasma IL-22 at 4weeks was 1.054 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.012, 1.124].

CONCLUSIONS

Increased peripheral and intrahepatic IL-22-secreting cells are detected in DILI. Th22 and its related cytokines might be hepato-protective, which might provide new perspective for understanding the immunopathogenesis of DILI. Plasma IL-22 might be a reliable indicator to evaluate the prognosis of DILI and provide a novel therapeutic target for DILI treatment.

Myasthenia Gravis: paradox versus paradigm in autoimmunity

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is a paradigm of organ-specific autoimmune disease (AID). It is mediated by antibodies that target the neuromuscular junction. The purpose of this review is to place MG in the general context of autoimmunity, to summarize the common mechanisms between MG and other AIDs, and to describe the specific mechanisms of MG. We have chosen the most common organ-specific AIDs to compare with MG: type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD), multiple sclerosis (MS), some systemic AIDs (systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjogren's syndrome (SS)), as well as inflammatory diseases of the gut and liver (celiac disease (CeD), Crohn's disease (CD), and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC)). Several features are similar between all AIDs, suggesting that common pathogenic mechanisms lead to their development. In this review, we address the predisposing factors (genetic, epigenetic, hormones, vitamin D, microbiota), the triggering components (infections, drugs) and their interactions with the immune system [1,2]. The dysregulation of the immune system is detailed and includes the role of B cells, Treg cells, Th17 and cytokines. We particularly focused on the role of TNF-α and interferon type I whose role in MG is very analogous to that in several other AIDS. The implication of AIRE, a key factor in central tolerance is also discussed. Finally, if MG is a prototype of AIDS, it has a clear specificity compared to the other AIDS, by the fact that the target organ, the muscle, is not the site of immune infiltration and B cell expansion, but exclusively that of antibody-mediated pathogenic mechanisms. By contrast, the thymus in the early onset subtype frequently undergoes tissue remodeling, resulting in the development of ectopic germinal centers surrounded by high endothelial venules (HEV), as observed in the target organs of many other AIDs.

Hepatic metabolic response to restricted copper intake in a Niemann–Pick C murine model

Niemann–Pick C disease (NPC) is a vesicular trafficking disorder primarily caused by mutations in theNpc1gene and characterized by liver dysfunction and neuropathology.

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions: current concepts

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for patients; they also markedly increase the uncertainty of drug development. The major targets are skin, liver, and bone marrow. Clinical characteristics suggest that IDRs are immune mediated, and there is substantive evidence that most, but not all, IDRs are caused by chemically reactive species. However, rigorous mechanistic studies are very difficult to perform, especially in the absence of valid animal models. Models to explain how drugs or reactive metabolites interact with the MHC/T-cell receptor complex include the hapten and P-I models, and most recently it was found that abacavir can interact reversibly with MHC to alter the endogenous peptides that are presented to T cells. The discovery of HLA molecules as important risk factors for some IDRs has also significantly contributed to our understanding of these adverse reactions, but it is not yet clear what fraction of IDRs have a strong HLA dependence. In addition, with the exception of abacavir, most patients who have the HLA that confers a higher IDR risk with a specific drug will not have an IDR when treated with that drug. Interindividual differences in T-cell receptors and other factors also presumably play a role in determining which patients will have an IDR. The immune response represents a delicate balance, and immune tolerance may be the dominant response to a drug that can cause IDRs.

Direct oxidation and covalent binding of isoniazid to rodent liver and human hepatic microsomes: humans are more like mice than rats

Isoniazid (INH) is associated with serious liver injury and autoimmunity. Classic studies in rats indicated that a reactive metabolite of acetylhydrazine is responsible for the covalent binding and toxicity of INH. Studies in rabbits suggested that hydrazine might be the toxic species. However, these models involved acute toxicity with high doses of INH, and INH-induced liver injury in humans has very different features than such animal models. In this study, we demonstrated that a reactive metabolite of INH itself can covalently bind in the liver of mice and also to human liver microsomes. Covalent binding also occurred in rats, but it was much less than that in mice. We were able to trap the reactive metabolite of INH with N-α-acetyl-l-lysine in incubations with human liver microsomes. This suggests that the reactive intermediate of INH that leads to covalent binding is a diazohydroxide rather than a radical or carbocation because those reactive metabolites would be too reactive to trap in this way. Treatment of mice or rats with INH for up to 5 weeks did not produce severe liver injury. The alanine transaminase assay (ALT) is inhibited by INH, and other assays such as glutamate and sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) were better biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury. High doses of INH (200 and 400 mg/kg/day) for one week produced steatosis in rats and an increase in SDH, which suggests that it can cause mitochondrial injury. However, steatosis was not observed when INH was given at lower doses for longer periods of time to either mice or rats. We propose that covalent binding of the parent drug can contribute to INH-induced hepatotoxicity and autoimmunity. We also propose that these are immune-mediated reactions, and there are clinical data to support these hypotheses.