1
|
Shymanovich T, Saville AC, Paul R, Wei Q, Ristaino JB. Rapid Detection of Viral, Bacterial, Fungal, and Oomycete Pathogens on Tomatoes with Microneedles, LAMP on a Microfluidic Chip, and Smartphone Device. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2024; 114:1975-1983. [PMID: 38829831 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-23-0481-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Rapid detection of plant diseases before they escalate can improve disease control. Our team has developed rapid nucleic acid extraction methods with microneedles and combined these with loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) assays for pathogen detection in the field. In this work, we developed LAMP assays for early blight (Alternaria linariae, A. alternata, and A. solani) and bacterial spot of tomato (Xanthomonas perforans) and validated these LAMP assays and two previously developed LAMP assays for tomato spotted wilt virus and late blight. Tomato plants were inoculated, and disease severity was measured. Extractions were performed using microneedles, and LAMP assays were run in tubes (with hydroxynaphthol blue) on a heat block or on a newly designed microfluidic slide chip on a heat block or a slide heater. Fluorescence on the microfluidic chip slides was visualized using EvaGreen and photographed on a smartphone. Plants inoculated with X. perforans or tomato spotted wilt virus tested positive prior to visible disease symptoms, whereas Phytophthora infestans and A. linariae were detected at the time of visual disease symptoms. LAMP assays were more sensitive than PCR, and the limit of detection was 1 pg of DNA for both A. linariae and X. perforans. The LAMP assay designed for early blight detected all three species of Alternaria that infect tomato and is thus an Alternaria spp. assay. This study demonstrates the utility of rapid microneedle extraction followed by LAMP on a microfluidic chip for rapid diagnosis of four important tomato pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsiana Shymanovich
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Amanda C Saville
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Rajesh Paul
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Qingshan Wei
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
- Emerging Plant Disease and Global Food Security Cluster, Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Jean Beagle Ristaino
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
- Emerging Plant Disease and Global Food Security Cluster, Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klosterman SJ, Clark KJ, Anchieta AG, Kandel SL, Mou B, McGrath MT, Correll JC, Shishkoff N. Transmission of Spinach Downy Mildew via Seed and Infested Leaf Debris. PLANT DISEASE 2024; 108:951-959. [PMID: 37840290 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-06-23-1225-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Spinach downy mildew, caused by the obligate oomycete pathogen Peronospora effusa, is a worldwide constraint on spinach production. The role of airborne sporangia in the disease cycle of P. effusa is well established, but the role of the sexual oospores in the epidemiology of P. effusa is less clear and has been a major challenge to examine experimentally. To evaluate seed transmission of spinach downy mildew via oospores in this study, isolated glass chambers were employed in two independent experiments to grow out oospore-infested spinach seed and noninfested seeds mixed with oospore-infested crop debris. Downy mildew diseased spinach plants were observed 37 and 34 days after planting in the two isolator experiments, respectively, in the chambers that contained one of two oospore-infested seed lots or seeds coated with oospore-infested leaves. Spinach plants in isolated glass chambers initiated from seeds without oospores did not show downy mildew symptoms. Similar findings were obtained using the same seed lot samples in a third experiment conducted in a growth chamber. In direct grow out tests to examine oospore infection on seedlings performed in a containment greenhouse with oospore-infested seed of two different cultivars, characteristic Peronospora sporangiophores were observed growing from a seedling of each cultivar. The frequency of seedlings developing symptoms from 82 of these oospore-infested seed indicated that approximately 2.4% of seedlings from infested seed developed symptoms, and 0.55% of seedlings from total seeds assayed developed symptoms. The results provide evidence that oospores can serve as a source of inoculum for downy mildew and provide further evidence of direct seed transmission of the downy mildew pathogen to seedlings in spinach via seedborne oospores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelley J Clark
- Crop Improvement and Protection Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Salinas, CA
| | - Amy G Anchieta
- Crop Improvement and Protection Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Salinas, CA
| | | | - Beiquan Mou
- Crop Improvement and Protection Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Salinas, CA
| | - Margaret T McGrath
- Long Island Horticultural Research and Extension Center, Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY
| | - James C Correll
- Department of Plant Pathology and Entomology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
| | - Nina Shishkoff
- Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Ft. Detrick, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trippa D, Scalenghe R, Basso MF, Panno S, Davino S, Morone C, Giovino A, Oufensou S, Luchi N, Yousefi S, Martinelli F. Next-generation methods for early disease detection in crops. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2024; 80:245-261. [PMID: 37599270 DOI: 10.1002/ps.7733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
Plant pathogens are commonly identified in the field by the typical disease symptoms that they can cause. The efficient early detection and identification of pathogens are essential procedures to adopt effective management practices that reduce or prevent their spread in order to mitigate the negative impacts of the disease. In this review, the traditional and innovative methods for early detection of the plant pathogens highlighting their major advantages and limitations are presented and discussed. Traditional techniques of diagnosis used for plant pathogen identification are focused typically on the DNA, RNA (when molecular methods), and proteins or peptides (when serological methods) of the pathogens. Serological methods based on mainly enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are the most common method used for pathogen detection due to their high-throughput potential and low cost. This technique is not particularly reliable and sufficiently sensitive for many pathogens detection during the asymptomatic stage of infection. For non-cultivable pathogens in the laboratory, nucleic acid-based technology is the best choice for consistent pathogen detection or identification. Lateral flow systems are innovative tools that allow fast and accurate results even in field conditions, but they have sensitivity issues to be overcome. PCR assays performed on last-generation portable thermocyclers may provide rapid detection results in situ. The advent of portable instruments can speed pathogen detection, reduce commercial costs, and potentially revolutionize plant pathology. This review provides information on current methodologies and procedures for the effective detection of different plant pathogens. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Trippa
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Scalenghe
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Panno
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Davino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Alimentari e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Chiara Morone
- Regione Piemonte - Phytosanitary Division, Torino, Italy
| | - Antonio Giovino
- Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA)-Research Centre for Plant Protection and Certification (CREA-DC), Palermo, Italy
| | - Safa Oufensou
- Dipartimento di Agraria, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Nicola Luchi
- National Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, (CNR-IPSP), Florence, Italy
| | - Sanaz Yousefi
- Department of Horticultural Science, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
| | - Federico Martinelli
- Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- National Research Council, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, (CNR-IPSP), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|